Marvell Technology share price today

Marvell Technology, Inc.'s share price was $159.86 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been moving sideways for 1 week. That is 13.4% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $77 and $311, and at that close it sat 35% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Marvell Technology, Inc. is in stage 1. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the S&P 500, and it has been behind for 1 week running.

Over the last 10 years the share price moved +1,499% while the S&P 500 moved +261%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 30 October 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Marvell Technology, Inc. paid $0.24 per share over the last four reported quarters. The most recent declaration was $0.06 for Aug 2026. At today's price of $159.86 that is a yield of 0.15%, based on dividends already paid, not a forecast.

A dividend is cash paid out for each share. The 12-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.

Marvell Technology is on 3 of our US lists: Nasdaq 100 companies, S&P 500 companies and US tech stocks.

Marvell Technology, Inc. earned $308 M of net profit in the Aug 2026 quarter, +58.1% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY26 profit was $2.7 B. That is 11.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $195 M. 5 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

Why profit moved: revenue changed +36.5% on a year earlier and the margin moved +1.8 percentage points. Sales did the work, and the margin was about flat.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +25.1% and revenue +30.8%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

Marvell Technology, Inc. reported $2.7 B of revenue in the Aug 2026 quarter, +36.5% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 8th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 4 years it has grown 16.4% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at $8.2 B.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to $9.5 B.

FY26 revenue was $8.2 B, +42.1% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +30.8% on average, against 16.4% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +30.6%, against +33.8% a year over the last 8 quarters (rolling over).

Marvell Technology, Inc.'s operating margin was 16.7% in the Aug 2026 quarter, 1.8 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Its latest full-year margin is the highest it has ever reported. Across 5 years it has been between −7.9% and 16.3%. The latest quarter is above every full year in that period.

Operating margin is what is left from every $100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +1.8 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +2.7 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

When margins are at a record, every ratio built on profit looks better than usual, so watch whether they hold.

Marvell Technology, Inc.'s cash-flow history is too short to judge how much of its profit turns into cash. In FY26 it brought in $1.8 B of operating cash against $2.7 B of profit. After $354 M of spending on assets, $1.4 B was left over as free cash.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Marvell Technology, Inc. does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent $975 M on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 4.0% of FY26 revenue a year.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn.

Spending on assets: $975 M over the last 3 years.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Marvell Technology, Inc.'s P/E is 53.7×, in the middle of its own history: higher than 51% of past readings. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 53.4×, over 1 year of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar of yearly profit.

In short: the multiple is about average against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Marvell Technology, Inc.'s business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 12 quarters of 2 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction.

One or more growth lines have an extreme jump caused by comparing with a near-zero or loss-making quarter. Those jumps are capped before reading and drawn at the edge of the chart, so one odd quarter does not decide the result.

The return figures here are yearly, not quarterly. They show level and direction only; they can support the growth lines but never decide the reading alone.

There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the stock price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Marvell Technology, Inc. earned a ROE of 19% in FY26. That is up from a low of −7% in FY25. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 9.7 percentage points below its cost of capital, so growth here does not yet pay for the capital it uses.

Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. We do not have the full capital split, so ROE is the longest history we can draw here.

It comes from a 32.6% net margin and 0.37× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 32.6% net margin × 0.37× asset turnover × 1.56× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 18.8% on equity. The margin does most of the work; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 6.9% − 16.6% = −9.7 percentage points. The 16.6% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Negative: growth at these returns loses value until returns improve.

Marvell Technology, Inc. has total debt of $5.3 B against shareholder equity of $18.5 B as of Aug 2026, so its debt is 0.29× its equity, which is very little. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.30 in FY22 to 0.33 in FY26. So the returns on this page come from the business, not from borrowed money.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

2.8% of Marvell Technology, Inc.'s tradable shares are in short positions, which are bets that the price will fall, so some traders are betting against it. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 1.2 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead.

There is no quarter-by-quarter list of owners here, so we look at short interest: the share of tradable shares held in short positions, which gain if the price falls.

It is a single reading at one point in time; we do not have its history.

Why it is at this level: the figure does not say who has the short positions or why, so we show the level without guessing the story.

For Marvell Technology, Inc., the Z-score is 7.97. A Z-score above about 3 is safe and below about 1.8 signals danger, so this is well clear of danger. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.