Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited share price today

Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited's share price was $18.59 at the close on 3 November 2026. That is 0.6% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $11 and $133, and at that close it sat 6% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the S&P 500, and it has been behind for 5 weeks running.

Over the last 1 year the share price moved +124% while the S&P 500 moved +23%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 2 October 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited pays no dividend. In the last 6 reported quarters it declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to show. Companies like this usually keep their earnings in the business, so the cash-flow sections show where that cash goes.

Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited is not in the Nasdaq 100, the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones 30, and is not on the US tech stocks list.

Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited posted a net loss of $1.4 M in the Mar 2026 quarter. The full FY26 year was a loss of $1.2 M. That loss is 37.9% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $590 K.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

Mar 2026 profit was −$1.4 M, −454.2% on a year earlier. For the full year, FY26 profit was −$1.2 M (−217.1% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +3.2% on a year earlier and the margin moved −53.8 percentage points. Sales did the work while the margin got thinner.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed −130.1% and revenue +13.0%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited reported $3.7 M of revenue in the Mar 2026 quarter, +3.2% on the same quarter a year earlier. Over 3 years it has grown 47.9% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at $7.2 M.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

FY26 revenue was $7.2 M, −2.2% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +13.0% on average, against 47.9% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited's operating margin was −38.5% in the Mar 2026 quarter, 53.8 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Over the last four quarters it has moved −64.1 percentage points. Across 4 years it has been between −16.8% and 21.4%. The latest quarter is below every full year in that period.

Operating margin is what is left from every $100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −64.1 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −41.0 points. So the drop came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years, 68% of Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so most of the profit is real cash. In FY26 its operations used $5.7 M of cash, against −$1.2 M of profit.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

After null of spending on assets, free cash was −$5.7 M: it spent more than its operations brought in.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason.

What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent $64.0 K on assets over the last 2 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.4% of FY26 revenue a year.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn.

Spending on assets: $64.0 K over the last 2 years.

In short: most of the cash goes on covering the loss, not on new assets; spending on assets is small next to it.

Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited's P/E is 812.0×, with too little history to compare. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved −198.6% while the price moved −1.4%. The price did better than earnings, which pushed the multiple up within its own range.

In short: there is too little history to say whether the multiple is high or low for this company, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited's business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 4 quarters of 1 measure, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction.

The latest quarter’s profit includes a one-off item bigger than the normal business, so the profit line is shown but does not count in this reading.

One or more growth lines have an extreme jump caused by comparing with a near-zero or loss-making quarter. Those jumps are capped before reading and drawn at the edge of the chart, so one odd quarter does not decide the result.

The return figures here are yearly, not quarterly. They show level and direction only; they can support the growth lines but never decide the reading alone.

There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the stock price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited earned a ROE of −20% in FY26. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is left out: on sales this small it reads 175%, a number that says nothing useful about the business. It comes from a −16.7% net margin and 0.98× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. We do not have the full capital split, so ROE is the longest history we can draw here.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a −16.7% net margin × 0.98× asset turnover × 1.19× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ −19.5% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed.

Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited has total debt of $65.0 K against shareholder equity of $6.2 M as of Mar 2026, so its debt is 0.01× its equity, which is very little. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.11 in FY23 to 0.01 in FY26. So the returns on this page come from the business, not from borrowed money.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

0.0% of Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited's tradable shares are in short positions, which are bets that the price will fall, so very few traders are betting against this stock. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 0.2 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead.

There is no quarter-by-quarter list of owners here, so we look at short interest: the share of tradable shares held in short positions, which gain if the price falls.

It is a single reading at one point in time; we do not have its history.

Why it is at this level: the figure does not say who has the short positions or why, so we show the level without guessing the story.

For Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited, the Z-score is 130.80. A Z-score above about 3 is safe and below about 1.8 signals danger, so this is well clear of danger. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 130.80 is well clear of the danger zone, so the balance sheet is not the risk here.

There is no score against its industry: Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited is not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison for Engineering & Construction.

The score ranks a company within its industry: each measure is scored against the other members. Without that group there is no score, so none is shown.

No sector comparison is shown here, not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison.

Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited is the 33rd largest of 37 Engineering & Construction companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 4 November 2026). Just above it: Bowman Consulting Group, Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. and Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. Just below it: Orion Group Holdings, Inc., Matrix Service Company and Magnitude International.

Engineering & Construction companies close in size

30. Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. $744 million
31. Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. $709 million
32. Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. $510 million
33. Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited $383 million
34. Orion Group Holdings, Inc. $319 million
35. Matrix Service Company $258 million
36. Magnitude International Ltd $237 million

All 37 Engineering & Construction companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

2981. Citi Trends, Inc. $403 million · Apparel Retail
2982. Starz Entertainment Corp. $403 million · Entertainment
2983. Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited $402 million
2984. Once Upon A Farm, PBC $400 million · Packaged Foods
2985. Editas Medicine, Inc. $399 million · Biotechnology

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 3 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.