GeoPark Limited share price today

GeoPark Limited's share price was $9.43 at the close on 4 November 2026. That is 4.0% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $7 and $12, and at that close it sat 50% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the S&P 500, and it has stayed ahead for 8 weeks in a row.

Over the last 1 year the share price moved +33% while the S&P 500 moved +23%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

GeoPark Limited paid $0.11 per share over the last four reported quarters. The most recent declaration was $0.02 for Jun 2026. At today's price of $9.43 that is a yield of 1.17%, based on dividends already paid, not a forecast.

A dividend is cash paid out for each share. The 12-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.

GeoPark Limited is not in the Nasdaq 100, the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones 30, and is not on the US tech stocks list.

GeoPark Limited earned $14.0 M of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $49.7 M. Over 4 years profit has grown −5.1% a year on average. That is 9.8% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $10.3 M. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY25 profit was $49.7 M (−48.5% on the year before).

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +40.0% and revenue −8.0%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra dollar of revenue adds more to profit.

GeoPark Limited reported $143 M of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +19.6% on the same quarter a year earlier. Over 4 years it has grown −8.0% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at $493 M. The last four reported quarters add to $507 M.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

FY25 revenue was $493 M, −25.5% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew −8.0% on average, against −8.0% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing at about the same pace as its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew −9.5%, against −17.7% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating); profit over the last 12 months grew +87.9%, against −12.9% a year (accelerating).

GeoPark Limited's operating margin was 27.5% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 22.7 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 years it has been between 21.5% and 40.6%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every $100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +22.7 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −9.4 points. So the gain came mostly from costs below the gross margin, such as staff and overheads, measured against sales.

Over the last 3 years, 306% of GeoPark Limited's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY25 it brought in $14.7 M of operating cash against $49.7 M of profit. After $98.4 M of spending on assets, free cash was −$83.7 M: it spent more than its operations brought in.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason.

What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building.

GeoPark Limited does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent $489 M on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 33.1% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn.

Spending on assets: $489 M over the last 3 years.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

GeoPark Limited's P/E is 7.0×, near the low end of its own history: it has been lower only 14% of the time. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 8.4×, over 1 year of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved −47.5% while the price moved +15.0%. The price did better than earnings, which pushed the multiple up within its own range.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

GeoPark Limited's business is turning around. Profit growth has swung from −59.6% at its low to +87.9%, improving for 3 quarters in a row, with ROCE steady at 12.4%. This is based on 12 quarters of 4 measures.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: a turn in growth is often where a bigger change starts. The lines say a turn is forming, so the question is whether the next quarters confirm it.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the stock price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

GeoPark Limited earned a ROE of 20% in FY25. That is up from a low of −99% in FY21. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 12.8 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 10.1% net margin and 0.47× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. We do not have the full capital split, so ROE is the longest history we can draw here.

Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 10.1% net margin × 0.47× asset turnover × 4.23× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 20.1% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 19.4% − 6.6% = +12.8 percentage points. The 6.6% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. A gap this wide means each dollar put back into the business creates more than a dollar of value.

The 19.4% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY25 at 18.1%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method.

GeoPark Limited has total debt of $660 M against shareholder equity of $365 M as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 1.81× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from −11.22 in FY21 to 2.36 in FY25. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

We have no ownership or short-position figures for GeoPark Limited, so this section says so rather than fill the gap. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 2.7 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead.

There is no quarter-by-quarter list of owners here, so we look at short interest: the share of tradable shares held in short positions, which gain if the price falls.

For GeoPark Limited, the Z-score is 1.32. A Z-score above about 3 is safe and below about 1.8 signals danger, so this is in the danger zone. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 1.32 is inside the danger zone, so the balance sheet is a real risk.

There is no score against its industry: GeoPark Limited is not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison for Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.

The score ranks a company within its industry: each measure is scored against the other members. Without that group there is no score, so none is shown.

No sector comparison is shown here, not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison.

GeoPark Limited is the 38th largest of 57 Oil & Gas Exploration & Production companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 4 November 2026). Just above it: Dorchester Minerals, L.P., Greenfire Resources and Kosmos Energy. Just below it: HighPeak Energy, Inc., Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. and Infinity Natural Resources, Inc.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production companies close in size

35. Dorchester Minerals, L.P. $1.4 billion
36. Greenfire Resources Ltd. $1.4 billion
37. Kosmos Energy Ltd. $1.3 billion
38. GeoPark Limited $1 billion
39. HighPeak Energy, Inc. $957 million
40. Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. $950 million
41. Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. $800 million

All 57 Oil & Gas Exploration & Production companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

2420. Westrock Coffee Company $1 billion · Packaged Foods
2421. Marten Transport, Ltd. $1 billion · Trucking
2422. GeoPark Limited $1 billion
2423. Willis Lease Finance Corporation $1 billion · Rental & Leasing Services
2424. Camden National Corporation $1 billion · Banks - Regional

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.