Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-04
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Food Distribution Stocks

Food Distribution: Sysco Corporation owns the largest revenue base; Performance Food Group Company has the fastest current growth.

01 · the industry itself · before any single company

How has Food Distribution moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 67% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 9% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of S&P 500 on a rolling three-month view for 10 weeks running.

BREAKING OUT · ahead 10w~Price and the fundamentals both up4 of 8 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS ↑10w · 7/8 >200d (−1) · 4/8 lead (+2) · EPS 5/8↑

20050020262025202420232022 524348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100223Mar 22Sep 22Mar 23Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reporting · thin coverageJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 8 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 124, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 8 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 143, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 11 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 103, against 100 at the start · up 17.0% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · down 0.5% on a year ago · 8 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 169, against 100 at the start · up 18.8% on a year ago · 11 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 151, against 100 at the start · up 22.9% on a year ago · 8 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 162, against 100 at the start · up 24.3% on a year ago · 8 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 155, against 100 at the start · up 11.6% on a year ago · 8 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 177, against 100 at the start · up 29.4% on a year ago · 8 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 194, against 100 at the start · up 6.5% on a year ago · 8 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 195, against 100 at the start · up 7.4% on a year ago · 8 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 223, against 100 at the start · up 11.4% on a year ago · 8 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 220, against 100 at the start · up 3.0% on a year ago · 8 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 215, against 100 at the start · up 2.0% on a year ago · 8 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 213, against 100 at the start · up 18.6% on a year ago · 8 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two213 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
20050020262025202420232022 524348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100223Mar 22Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reporting · thin coverageJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 8 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 124, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 8 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 143, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 11 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 103, against 100 at the start · up 17.0% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · down 0.5% on a year ago · 8 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 169, against 100 at the start · up 18.8% on a year ago · 11 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 151, against 100 at the start · up 22.9% on a year ago · 8 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 162, against 100 at the start · up 24.3% on a year ago · 8 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 155, against 100 at the start · up 11.6% on a year ago · 8 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 177, against 100 at the start · up 29.4% on a year ago · 8 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 194, against 100 at the start · up 6.5% on a year ago · 8 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 195, against 100 at the start · up 7.4% on a year ago · 8 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 223, against 100 at the start · up 11.4% on a year ago · 8 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 220, against 100 at the start · up 3.0% on a year ago · 8 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 215, against 100 at the start · up 2.0% on a year ago · 8 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 213, against 100 at the start · up 18.6% on a year ago · 8 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two213No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Food Distribution, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 8 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Food Distribution outperforming S&P 500?

Food Distribution has outperformed S&P 500 by 20.2% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 3.7%. 5 of 8 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +29.6%.

+3.7%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+20.2%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
5/8Stocks leading S&P 500
2/8Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Food Distribution has outperformed S&P 500 by 20.2% over 52 weeks and 3.7% over 13 weeks. 5 of 8 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 2 of 8 beat the sector itself. Sysco Corporation leads with revenue of $83,567 million, based on 7 of 8 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Companies
8
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$90.5B
Sysco Corporation
Revenue growing
4/7
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
5/8
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 8
03 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 57.8% evidence confidence.
G. Willi-Food International Ltd. looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.CHEF 67.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 22.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.7 pp 45% evidence 16.0/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 3.1% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 45.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 20.0/20 RS sector 29.6% · RS bench 40.8% · 1Y 75%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.5 + 16 + 8.9 + 20 = 67.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
2US Foods Holding Corp.USFD 57.8/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence TURNING 20.9/35 Revenue 3.7% · PAT 28.5% · OPM change -0.2 pp 83% evidence 10.5/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 2.2% 76% evidence 14.7/20 P/E 30.6× · PEG 0.84 65% evidence 11.7/20 RS sector -4% · RS bench 4.6% · 1Y 23.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.9 + 10.5 + 14.7 + 11.7 = 57.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3The Andersons, Inc.ANDE 51.3/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 17.1/35 Revenue -2% · PAT -11.7% · OPM change 0.3 pp 83% evidence 6.8/25 ROCE 0.7% · OPM 0.6% 76% evidence 14.4/20 P/E 19.1× · PEG 1.03 65% evidence 13.0/20 RS sector 3.4% · RS bench 11.7% · 1Y 96.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.1 + 6.8 + 14.4 + 13 = 51.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4G. Willi-Food International Ltd.WILC 49.9/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 13.4/35 Revenue 6.3% · PAT -30.6% · OPM change -1 pp 83% evidence 13.9/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 12.8% 76% evidence 16.5/20 P/E 12.3× · PEG 0.48 65% evidence 6.1/20 RS sector -9.9% · RS bench -2% · 1Y 39.1%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13.4 + 13.9 + 16.5 + 6.1 = 49.9 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
5Performance Food Group CompanyPFGC 46.1/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence BREAKING OUT 16.4/35 Revenue 8.4% · PAT -12% · OPM change -0.2 pp 83% evidence 9.4/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 0.9% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 39.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.5/20 RS sector -6% · RS bench 3.2% · 1Y 16%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.4 + 9.4 + 9.8 + 10.5 = 46.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Sysco CorporationSYY 45.2/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence BREAKING OUT 15.0/35 Revenue 3.4% · PAT -9.1% · OPM change -0.5 pp 83% evidence 14.6/25 ROCE 3.6% · OPM 3% 76% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 22.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.0/20 RS sector -14.6% · RS bench -6.4% · 1Y 2.7%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15 + 14.6 + 10.6 + 5 = 45.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7United Natural Foods, Inc.UNFI 43.1/100Mixed-negative evidence67% evidence ASLEEP 18.0/35 Revenue -3.2% · PAT — · OPM change 0.7 pp 71% evidence 7.1/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 0.9% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 51.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.5/20 RS sector -0.9% · RS bench 7.6% · 1Y 86.1%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 7.1 + 8.5 + 9.5 = 43.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8Mission Produce, Inc.AVO 18.4/100Adverse evidence69% evidence BASING 2.1/35 Revenue -10.4% · PAT -40.5% · OPM change -4.2 pp 95% evidence 3.9/25 ROCE -0.8% · OPM -2.4% 76% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 43.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -17.6% · RS bench -9.7% · 1Y 3.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 2.1 + 3.9 + 9.4 + 3 = 18.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
04 · what price has already done

Market action

The Andersons, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Food Distribution at +96.3%. The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +40.8%. 5 of 8 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Sysco Corporation has the highest Revenue among the 8 Food Distribution companies compared here, at $83,567 million. Performance Food Group Company is next at $66,750 million. Performance Food Group Company has the highest Revenue growth at 8.4%, so level and change sit with different companies. 7 of 8 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Sysco Corporation is the scale leader at $83,567 million, 25.2% ahead of Performance Food Group Company. Performance Food Group Company's growth is 8.4% from a $66,750 million base, with 18 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderSysco Corporation · $83,567 million
Gap25.2% versus #2 · Performance Food Group Company
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/8 companies · 151 observations

Investor read: Sysco Corporation is the scale benchmark; Performance Food Group Company is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Sysco Corporation's growth falls below Performance Food Group Company's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenue · company comparison
7/8 level · 7/8 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Sysco Corporation SYY$20.5B4.7%Mar 2026
Performance Food Group Company PFGC$16.3B6.4%Mar 2026
US Foods Holding Corp. USFD$9.6B2.8%Mar 2026
United Natural Foods, Inc. UNFI$7.7B-4.2%Jun 2026
The Andersons, Inc. ANDE$2.6B-1.2%Mar 2026
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. CHEF$1.1B11%Jun 2026
Mission Produce, Inc. AVO$291M-23%Jun 2026
G. Willi-Food International Ltd. WILC$157M8.3%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

G. Willi-Food International Ltd. · WILC

$106M
$117M
$118M
$123M
$124M
$133M
$151M
$129M
$124M
$139M
$136M
$147M
$153M
$140M
$145M
$160M
$153M
$152M
$157M

Mission Produce, Inc. · AVO

$247M
$237M
$217M
$278M
$313M
$238M
$214M
$221M
$261M
$258M
$259M
$298M
$324M
$354M
$334M
$380M
$358M
$319M
$279M
$291M

Performance Food Group Company · PFGC

$9.3B
$10.4B
$12.8B
$13.1B
$14.6B
$14.7B
$13.8B
$14.9B
$14.3B
$13.9B
$15.2B
$15.4B
$15.6B
$15.3B
$16.9B
$17.1B
$16.4B
$16.3B

Sysco Corporation · SYY

$16.1B
$16.5B
$16.3B
$16.9B
$19.0B
$19.1B
$18.9B
$19.7B
$19.3B
$19.4B
$20.6B
$20.5B
$20.2B
$19.6B
$21.1B
$21.1B
$20.8B
$20.5B

The Andersons, Inc. · ANDE

$3.0B
$3.8B
$4.0B
$4.5B
$4.2B
$4.7B
$3.9B
$4.0B
$3.6B
$3.2B
$2.7B
$2.8B
$2.6B
$3.1B
$2.7B
$3.1B
$2.7B
$2.5B
$2.6B

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. · CHEF

$484M
$558M
$512M
$648M
$662M
$791M
$720M
$882M
$882M
$950M
$874M
$955M
$931M
$1.0B
$951M
$1.0B
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.1B

United Natural Foods, Inc. · UNFI

$6.7B
$7.0B
$7.4B
$7.2B
$7.3B
$7.5B
$7.8B
$7.5B
$7.4B
$7.6B
$7.8B
$7.5B
$8.2B
$7.9B
$8.2B
$8.1B
$7.7B
$7.8B
$7.9B
$7.7B

US Foods Holding Corp. · USFD

$7.7B
$7.9B
$7.6B
$7.8B
$8.8B
$8.9B
$8.5B
$9.0B
$8.9B
$8.9B
$9.7B
$9.7B
$9.5B
$9.4B
$10.1B
$10.2B
$9.8B
$9.6B

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

G. Willi-Food International Ltd. · WILC

7.9%
17%
14%
28%
4.9%
0.0%
4.5%
-9.9%
14%
23%
0.7%
6.6%
8.8%
0.0%
8.6%
8.3%

Mission Produce, Inc. · AVO

27%
0.4%
-1.4%
-21%
-17%
8.4%
21%
35%
24%
37%
29%
28%
10%
-9.9%
-16%
-23%

Performance Food Group Company · PFGC

57%
42%
5.3%
1.9%
-2.9%
10%
3.7%
9.4%
10%
12%
11%
5.2%
6.4%

Sysco Corporation · SYY

17%
16%
12%
4.1%
0.8%
8.9%
3.8%
4.5%
1.1%
2.8%
3.2%
3.0%
4.7%

The Andersons, Inc. · ANDE

38%
41%
24%
-2.4%
-9.7%
-14%
-31%
-30%
-30%
-28%
-2.8%
-2.2%
12%
2.2%
-19%
-1.2%

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. · CHEF

53%
37%
42%
41%
36%
33%
20%
21%
8.3%
5.6%
8.8%
8.8%
8.4%
9.7%
11%
11%

United Natural Foods, Inc. · UNFI

8.0%
7.7%
5.4%
3.7%
2.0%
0.3%
-0.5%
-0.1%
10.0%
4.2%
4.9%
7.5%
-5.6%
-0.4%
-2.6%
-4.2%

US Foods Holding Corp. · USFD

15%
13%
9.5%
2.1%
0.2%
14%
7.9%
6.2%
4.5%
3.8%
4.8%
3.3%
2.8%
06 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

G. Willi-Food International Ltd. has the highest OPM among the 8 Food Distribution companies compared here, at 12.8%. The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. is next at 3.1%. The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. has the highest Margin change at +0.7 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 8 of 8 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: G. Willi-Food International Ltd. leads opm at 12.8%; The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. leads margin change at +0.7 percentage points.

LeaderG. Willi-Food International Ltd. · 12.8%
Gap312.9% versus #2 · The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage8/8 companies · 151 observations

Investor read: G. Willi-Food International Ltd. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Operating margin · company comparison
8/8 level · 8/8 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
G. Willi-Food International Ltd. WILC13%−1.0 ppMar 2026
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. CHEF3.1%+0.7 ppJun 2026
Sysco Corporation SYY3.0%−0.5 ppMar 2026
US Foods Holding Corp. USFD2.2%−0.2 ppMar 2026
Performance Food Group Company PFGC0.9%−0.2 ppMar 2026
United Natural Foods, Inc. UNFI0.9%+0.7 ppJun 2026
The Andersons, Inc. ANDE0.6%+0.3 ppMar 2026
Mission Produce, Inc. AVO-2.4%−4.2 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

G. Willi-Food International Ltd. · WILC

7.7%
11%
8.0%
12%
7.7%
8.7%
8.6%
0.8%
0.4%
4.2%
8.5%
15%
12%
7.9%
14%
13%
12%
11%
13%

Mission Produce, Inc. · AVO

9.6%
7.7%
-8.4%
0.4%
7.0%
-18%
-4.7%
-0.5%
4.2%
2.8%
3.1%
4.1%
5.2%
8.1%
2.8%
1.8%
5.9%
8.8%
0.9%
-2.4%

Performance Food Group Company · PFGC

0.9%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
1.0%
1.3%
1.2%
1.8%
1.2%
1.1%
1.9%
1.4%
1.0%
1.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.2%
0.9%

Sysco Corporation · SYY

3.6%
3.8%
2.7%
2.9%
4.1%
3.9%
3.7%
4.9%
3.6%
3.7%
4.7%
3.9%
3.5%
3.5%
4.2%
3.8%
3.3%
3.0%

The Andersons, Inc. · ANDE

0.4%
2.2%
0.4%
2.7%
1.1%
0.7%
-1.5%
2.6%
0.9%
2.6%
0.3%
2.1%
2.2%
2.1%
0.3%
0.8%
-0.1%
3.9%
0.6%

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. · CHEF

2.2%
2.8%
1.2%
4.3%
3.3%
3.8%
1.7%
2.9%
2.9%
4.0%
1.8%
3.5%
3.4%
4.5%
2.4%
3.9%
3.8%
3.8%
3.1%

United Natural Foods, Inc. · UNFI

0.7%
1.5%
1.7%
1.7%
0.9%
1.3%
0.8%
0.4%
-1.0%
-0.2%
0.2%
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.3%
0.2%
-1.0%
0.2%
0.7%
0.9%

US Foods Holding Corp. · USFD

1.6%
1.7%
1.8%
0.4%
1.7%
2.4%
2.2%
3.6%
3.1%
1.8%
3.6%
2.9%
3.2%
2.4%
3.7%
2.8%
3.3%
2.2%

Margin change · reported quarter history

G. Willi-Food International Ltd. · WILC

−0.2 pp
0.0 pp
−1.9 pp
+0.6 pp
−11.0 pp
−7.3 pp
−4.5 pp
−0.1 pp
+13.7 pp
+11.1 pp
+3.7 pp
+5.3 pp
−1.6 pp
+0.5 pp
+3.2 pp
−1.0 pp

Mission Produce, Inc. · AVO

−2.6 pp
−25.4 pp
+3.7 pp
−0.9 pp
−2.8 pp
+20.5 pp
+7.8 pp
+4.6 pp
+1.0 pp
+5.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−2.3 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.7 pp
−1.9 pp
−4.2 pp

Performance Food Group Company · PFGC

+0.1 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.8 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.2 pp
0.0 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.2 pp

Sysco Corporation · SYY

+0.5 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.8 pp
−0.3 pp
+1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.5 pp

The Andersons, Inc. · ANDE

+0.9 pp
+0.7 pp
−1.5 pp
−1.9 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
+1.9 pp
+1.8 pp
−0.5 pp
+1.3 pp
−0.5 pp
0.0 pp
−1.3 pp
−2.3 pp
+1.8 pp
+0.3 pp

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. · CHEF

+3.2 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.5 pp
−1.4 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.7 pp

United Natural Foods, Inc. · UNFI

+0.2 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.9 pp
−1.3 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.5 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.3 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.7 pp

US Foods Holding Corp. · USFD

+0.1 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.8 pp
+1.9 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.4 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Sysco Corporation has the highest Net profit among the 8 Food Distribution companies compared here, at $1,736 million. US Foods Holding Corp. is next at $677 million. US Foods Holding Corp. has the highest Profit growth at 28.5%, so level and change sit with different companies. 7 of 8 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Sysco Corporation leads with $1,736 million of TTM profit, 156.4% above US Foods Holding Corp.. US Foods Holding Corp. shows 28.5% growth from a $677 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderSysco Corporation · $1,736 million
Gap156.4% versus #2 · US Foods Holding Corp.
Persistence1/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/8 companies · 151 observations

Investor read: Sysco Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profit · company comparison
7/8 level · 6/8 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Sysco Corporation SYY$340M-15%Mar 2026
US Foods Holding Corp. USFD$116M0.9%Mar 2026
Performance Food Group Company PFGC$42M-28%Mar 2026
United Natural Foods, Inc. UNFI$33M-350%Jun 2026
The Andersons, Inc. ANDE$29M480%Mar 2026
G. Willi-Food International Ltd. WILC$20M0.0%Mar 2026
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. CHEF$17M70%Jun 2026
Mission Produce, Inc. AVO$-7M-333%Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

G. Willi-Food International Ltd. · WILC

$5M
$3M
$14M
$7M
$8M
$13M
$11M
$5M
$5M
$11M
$19M
$7M
$21M
$24M
$20M
$32M
$19M
$-21M
$20M

Mission Produce, Inc. · AVO

$18M
$17M
$-13M
$2M
$18M
$-42M
$-11M
$-5M
$6M
$6M
$2M
$7M
$12M
$21M
$6M
$3M
$15M
$17M
$0M
$-7M

Performance Food Group Company · PFGC

$44M
$5M
$8M
$23M
$76M
$96M
$80M
$150M
$78M
$70M
$167M
$108M
$42M
$58M
$132M
$94M
$62M
$42M

Sysco Corporation · SYY

$151M
$378M
$167M
$303M
$510M
$466M
$430M
$734M
$415M
$425M
$612M
$490M
$406M
$401M
$531M
$476M
$389M
$340M

The Andersons, Inc. · ANDE

$26M
$128M
$12M
$204M
$69M
$36M
$-59M
$83M
$31M
$78M
$13M
$52M
$51M
$54M
$5M
$17M
$26M
$71M
$29M

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. · CHEF

$3M
$8M
$1M
$17M
$8M
$1M
$1M
$10M
$7M
$16M
$2M
$16M
$14M
$24M
$10M
$21M
$19M
$22M
$17M

United Natural Foods, Inc. · UNFI

$41M
$77M
$68M
$68M
$41M
$67M
$22M
$8M
$-67M
$-39M
$-14M
$-20M
$-37M
$-20M
$-2M
$-7M
$-86M
$-4M
$20M
$33M

US Foods Holding Corp. · USFD

$55M
$64M
$69M
$-15M
$70M
$109M
$82M
$182M
$147M
$82M
$198M
$148M
$66M
$115M
$224M
$153M
$184M
$116M

Profit growth · reported quarter history

G. Willi-Food International Ltd. · WILC

-59%
60%
333%
-21%
-29%
-38%
-15%
73%
40%
320%
118%
5.3%
357%
-9.5%
-188%
0.0%

Mission Produce, Inc. · AVO

0.0%
-347%
-350%
-67%
100%
250%
200%
-57%
25%
-19%
-100%
-333%

Performance Food Group Company · PFGC

73%
1,820%
248%
97%
-19%
109%
-28%
-46%
-17%
-21%
-13%
48%
-28%

Sysco Corporation · SYY

238%
23%
42%
44%
-11%
42%
-33%
-2.2%
-5.7%
-13%
-2.9%
-4.2%
-15%

The Andersons, Inc. · ANDE

127%
165%
-72%
-592%
-59%
-55%
117%
-37%
65%
-31%
-62%
-67%
-49%
31%
480%

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. · CHEF

1,600%
167%
-88%
0.0%
-41%
-13%
1,500%
100%
60%
100%
50%
400%
31%
36%
-8.3%
70%

United Natural Foods, Inc. · UNFI

0.0%
-13%
-68%
-88%
-263%
-158%
-164%
-350%

US Foods Holding Corp. · USFD

27%
70%
160%
35%
141%
-19%
-55%
40%
13%
3.4%
179%
0.9%
08 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. has the highest ROCE among the 8 Food Distribution companies compared here, at 3.9%. Sysco Corporation is next at 3.6%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +1 percentage points. 8 of 8 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. leads ROCE at 3.9%, 0.3 percentage points above Sysco Corporation. The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +1 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderThe Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. · 3.9%
Gap8.3% versus #2 · Sysco Corporation
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage8/8 companies · 147 observations

Investor read: The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
Return on capital · company comparison
8/8 level · 8/8 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. CHEF3.9%+1.0 ppJun 2026
Sysco Corporation SYY3.6%−0.5 ppMar 2026
G. Willi-Food International Ltd. WILC3.1%−0.3 ppMar 2026
US Foods Holding Corp. USFD2.1%−0.1 ppMar 2026
United Natural Foods, Inc. UNFI1.3%+1.0 ppJun 2026
Performance Food Group Company PFGC1.1%−0.5 ppMar 2026
The Andersons, Inc. ANDE0.7%+0.4 ppMar 2026
Mission Produce, Inc. AVO-0.8%−1.6 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

G. Willi-Food International Ltd. · WILC

1.4%
2.1%
1.6%
2.4%
1.7%
2.0%
2.3%
0.2%
0.1%
1.0%
2.1%
3.8%
3.1%
2.7%
3.4%
3.4%
2.9%
2.4%
3.1%

Mission Produce, Inc. · AVO

2.5%
-2.5%
0.1%
2.8%
-5.4%
-1.3%
-0.2%
1.3%
0.9%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
3.5%
1.1%
0.8%
2.5%
3.4%
0.3%
-0.8%

Performance Food Group Company · PFGC

0.7%
0.8%
1.0%
2.2%
2.3%
2.0%
3.0%
1.9%
1.7%
3.0%
2.2%
1.4%
1.6%
2.3%
1.8%
1.4%
1.1%

Sysco Corporation · SYY

4.2%
3.0%
3.4%
5.6%
5.3%
5.0%
7.0%
4.6%
4.8%
6.5%
5.2%
4.4%
4.1%
5.5%
4.9%
4.1%
3.6%

The Andersons, Inc. · ANDE

0.5%
3.8%
0.8%
5.2%
2.4%
1.6%
-2.8%
4.9%
1.5%
3.9%
0.4%
2.7%
2.6%
2.9%
0.3%
1.0%
-0.1%
4.5%
0.7%

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. · CHEF

1.2%
1.8%
0.7%
3.2%
2.4%
2.8%
1.1%
2.3%
2.2%
3.0%
1.3%
2.6%
2.4%
3.4%
1.7%
2.9%
2.7%
2.9%
2.2%
3.9%

United Natural Foods, Inc. · UNFI

2.0%
2.4%
2.3%
1.3%
1.8%
1.2%
0.6%
-1.5%
-0.3%
0.3%
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.5%
0.3%
-1.5%
0.4%
1.1%
1.3%

US Foods Holding Corp. · USFD

1.3%
1.3%
0.3%
1.5%
2.1%
1.9%
3.2%
2.8%
1.6%
3.5%
2.8%
3.0%
2.2%
3.6%
2.8%
3.1%
2.1%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

G. Willi-Food International Ltd. · WILC

+0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.7 pp
−2.2 pp
−1.6 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.2 pp
+3.6 pp
+3.0 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.3 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.3 pp

Mission Produce, Inc. · AVO

−7.9 pp
+1.2 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.5 pp
+6.3 pp
+2.3 pp
+1.7 pp
+0.7 pp
+2.6 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.8 pp
−1.6 pp

Performance Food Group Company · PFGC

+1.6 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.8 pp
−0.4 pp
+1.0 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.4 pp
0.0 pp
−0.5 pp

Sysco Corporation · SYY

+1.1 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.4 pp
−0.7 pp
+1.5 pp
−1.8 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.7 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.5 pp

The Andersons, Inc. · ANDE

+1.9 pp
−2.2 pp
−3.6 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.9 pp
+2.3 pp
+3.2 pp
−2.2 pp
+1.1 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.1 pp
−1.7 pp
−2.7 pp
+1.6 pp
+0.4 pp

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. · CHEF

+1.2 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.5 pp
+0.5 pp
+1.0 pp

United Natural Foods, Inc. · UNFI

−0.2 pp
−1.2 pp
−1.7 pp
−2.8 pp
−2.1 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.5 pp
+1.5 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.2 pp
−1.5 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.0 pp

US Foods Holding Corp. · USFD

+0.8 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.7 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.6 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.1 pp
0.0 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

G. Willi-Food International Ltd. has the lowest PEG among the 8 Food Distribution companies compared here, at 0.48×. US Foods Holding Corp. is next at 0.84×. The same company also holds the lowest P/E, at 12.3×. 3 of 8 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026. Its PEG series carries 4 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: G. Willi-Food International Ltd. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.48×, 42.9% below US Foods Holding Corp.. Only 3 of 8 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderG. Willi-Food International Ltd. · 0.48×
Gap42.9% versus #2 · US Foods Holding Corp.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/8 companies · 16 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
Valuation · company comparison
3/8 level · 8/8 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. CHEF1.545.7Jun 2026
The Andersons, Inc. ANDE1.019.1Mar 2026
US Foods Holding Corp. USFD0.830.6Mar 2026
G. Willi-Food International Ltd. WILC0.512.4Mar 2026
Sysco Corporation SYY22.7Mar 2026
Performance Food Group Company PFGC39.5Mar 2026
United Natural Foods, Inc. UNFI51.8Jun 2026
Mission Produce, Inc. AVO43.3Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

G. Willi-Food International Ltd. · WILC

0.6
1.4
1.1
0.5

The Andersons, Inc. · ANDE

1.4
0.9
1.0

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. · CHEF

1.5
1.8
0.7
0.7
1.3
1.5

US Foods Holding Corp. · USFD

2.8
0.6
0.8

P/E · reported quarter history

G. Willi-Food International Ltd. · WILC

16.7
18.2
21.6
26.8
21.5
15.5
19.1
17.0
15.9
16.2
13.0
11.7
9.8
11.7
10.6
9.3
10.1
14.1
12.4

Mission Produce, Inc. · AVO

30.1
34.8
37.4
41.7
124.9
45.4
34.1
22.7
21.2
21.0
22.9
21.7
29.3
43.3

Performance Food Group Company · PFGC

148.0
183.6
110.7
63.1
32.8
29.0
23.7
25.2
27.8
23.7
28.9
34.3
32.2
40.1
50.1
41.7
39.5

Sysco Corporation · SYY

61.2
51.7
42.5
32.7
25.1
25.6
21.4
18.8
20.8
18.4
20.0
19.8
19.2
20.1
22.0
20.0
22.7

The Andersons, Inc. · ANDE

11.3
12.6
17.4
8.4
6.9
10.1
12.2
17.3
27.3
19.6
16.2
16.6
14.3
12.2
13.5
15.6
18.6
19.1
19.1

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. · CHEF

86.3
50.5
34.0
45.6
48.6
67.5
41.5
33.4
43.3
39.5
36.7
36.9
35.4
39.0
33.8
37.8
32.5
45.7

United Natural Foods, Inc. · UNFI

11.6
9.9
10.4
10.4
11.0
13.1
12.8
51.8

US Foods Holding Corp. · USFD

241.6
64.5
59.6
44.7
29.7
26.6
23.8
22.5
26.6
25.2
25.8
33.8
29.6
33.0
31.9
26.0
30.6
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Food Distribution comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 8 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
11 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 8 Food Distribution companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Food Distribution company comparison FAQs

These 22 answers restate the Food Distribution comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 8 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Food Distribution sector outperforming S&P 500?

Food Distribution has outperformed S&P 500 by 20.2% over 52 weeks and 3.7% over 13 weeks. 5 of 8 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 2 of 8 beat the sector itself.

Which Food Distribution company is largest by revenue?

Sysco Corporation leads with revenue of $83,567 million, based on 7 of 8 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Which Food Distribution company is growing fastest?

Performance Food Group Company has the fastest current revenue growth at 8.4%, across 7 of 8 comparable companies.

Which Food Distribution company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. ranks first at 67.4/100 with 57.8% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Food Distribution company has the lowest comparable PEG?

G. Willi-Food International Ltd. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.48, among 3 of 8 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Food Distribution comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Which Food Distribution company is the biggest?

Sysco Corporation is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $83,567 million, ahead of Performance Food Group Company at $66,750 million. That covers 7 of 8 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.

Which Food Distribution company has the best profit margins?

G. Willi-Food International Ltd. has the highest operating margin at 12.8%, from 8 of 8 comparable companies. The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +0.7 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Food Distribution company makes the most profit?

Sysco Corporation earns the most, at $1,736 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 7 of 8 comparable companies. US Foods Holding Corp. has the fastest profit growth at 28.5%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Food Distribution company earns the highest return on capital?

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. leads on return on capital employed at 3.9%, across 8 of 8 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Food Distribution stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — G. Willi-Food International Ltd. screens cheapest at 0.48×. Only 3 of 8 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Food Distribution sector beating the market?

Food Distribution has outperformed S&P 500 by 20.2% over the last 52 weeks and 3.7% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 5 of 8 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Food Distribution stock has the strongest price momentum?

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Food Distribution company scores highest for research priority?

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. scores 67.4 out of 100 with 57.8% evidence confidence, from 22.5 points on growth and earnings, 16 on capital efficiency, 8.9 on valuation and 20 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Food Distribution companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 8 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Food Distribution sector?

The 8 Food Distribution companies on this page carry $90,538 million of combined market value. Sysco Corporation is the largest at $39,589 million, about 44% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.

What is the Food Distribution sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 8 Food Distribution companies on this page is 39.5×, measured on the 8 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.

How is the Food Distribution sector performing?

5 of the 8 covered Food Distribution companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 20.2% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.

How many Food Distribution stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 8 listed Food Distribution companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI