Pashupati Cotspin share price today

Pashupati Cotspin Ltd's share price was ₹133.85 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been falling for 6 weeks. That is 56.3% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹69 and ₹135, and at that close it sat 99% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Pashupati Cotspin Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the NIFTY 500, and it has stayed ahead for 4 weeks in a row.

Over the last 9.2 years the share price moved +1,685% while the NIFTY 500 moved +147%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

1. Number of shareholders up 172% in a year

   2,110 shareholders in the September 2026 quarter, against 777 a year earlier.

2. Best operating margin in 9 quarters

   Operating margin was 9.5% in the June 2026 quarter, against 3.9% a year earlier.

For April to June 2026 (the quarter ended 30 June 2026), Pashupati Cotspin reported revenue of ₹130 crore, up 9.7% from ₹119 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹7.25 crore, up 277.6% from ₹1.92 crore.

Pashupati Cotspin results: April to June 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for July to September 2026, are due by 14 November 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 June 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Pashupati Cotspin closed at ₹133.85 on 4 November 2026, up 63.3% from ₹81.99 a year earlier (7 November 2025) and up 1,594.3% over five years. Its highest weekly close since September 2017 was ₹134.60 on 30 October 2026.

Pashupati Cotspin share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices, adjusted for splits and bonuses so every price is on today’s share count. Each change is the move from that price to the 4 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

367 weekly closes from 8 September 2017 to 4 November 2026.

4 Nov 2026: Pashupati Cotspin closed at ₹133.85, down 0.6% on the week and up 69.5% on the month. 23 Sep 2026: ex-date for a dividend of ₹0.05 a share.

Earlier

• Results for April to June 2026: Revenue up 9.7% and profit up 277.6% on a year earlier.
• 17 Apr 2026: Share split: face value cut from ₹10 to ₹1 a share (ex-date).

Pashupati Cotspin paid ₹0.05 a share in regular dividends in the 12 months to 5 November 2026 (1 payment), a yield of 0.04% at the ₹133.85 close on 4 November 2026. The last was a dividend of ₹0.05 a share, ex-date 23 September 2026.

Pashupati Cotspin dividends since 1 April 2021

Amounts as the company declared them on the NSE. A dividend goes to whoever owns the shares before the ex-date. The record date is the same day as the ex-date for every payment here.

Yes. Pashupati Cotspin Ltd paid out 1% of its profit as dividends in FY26, and it paid a dividend in 3 of its last 4 reported years.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

Pashupati Cotspin is on 2 of our India lists: Momentum stocks and 52 week high & low.

Pashupati Cotspin Ltd earned ₹7.3 Cr of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +277.6% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹10.0 Cr. Over 3 years profit has grown 35.7% a year on average. That is 5.6% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹1.9 Cr.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹10.0 Cr (−28.6% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +9.7% on a year earlier and the margin moved +5.6 percentage points. Most of the change came from keeping more of each sale.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +91.3% and revenue +2.2%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra rupee of revenue adds more to profit.

Pashupati Cotspin Ltd reported ₹130 Cr of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +9.7% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 2nd quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 3 years it has grown 15.8% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹688 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹699 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹688 Cr, +8.0% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +2.2% on average, against 15.8% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Pashupati Cotspin Ltd's operating margin was 9.5% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 5.6 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 4 years it has been between 3.8% and 4.8%. The latest quarter is above every full year in that period.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +5.6 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +7.0 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years, 328% of Pashupati Cotspin Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY26 it brought in ₹37.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹10.0 Cr of profit. After ₹0.0 Cr of spending on assets, ₹37.0 Cr was left over as free cash.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 328% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle stayed about the same between FY23 and FY26, so the cash follows profit, not the cycle.

What to look at next: no single use of cash stands out. The next section checks both the cash tied up in daily operations and the spending on assets.

Pashupati Cotspin Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 87 days in FY26, up from 79 days in FY23. It spent ₹10.0 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 28 days to pay, and stock sits for 86 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹688 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹1.9 Cr, so roughly ₹164 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 28 days to pay and stock sat for 86 days, about 2.8 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of 87 days, longer than FY23's 79.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 86 days. Customers pay about 28 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 27 days. Together that makes the 87-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹10.0 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹30.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is spending about what it takes to replace what wears out, or less. Work still in progress is ₹0.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: neither the daily cycle nor new spending is soaking up the cash, so the picture is fairly clean.

Pashupati Cotspin Ltd's P/E is 134.8×, near the high end of its own history: higher than 97% of past readings. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 84.5×, over 3 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved −25.8% while the price moved +63.3%. The price did better than earnings, which pushed the multiple up within its own range.

Where the price move came from: over 3 years the price moved +118.8% a year; about +58.2% a year came from earnings growth and about +60.6 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying more). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is high against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Pashupati Cotspin Ltd's business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 5 quarters of 1 measure, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction.

One or more growth lines have an extreme jump caused by comparing with a near-zero or loss-making quarter. Those jumps are capped before reading and drawn at the edge of the chart, so one odd quarter does not decide the result.

There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Revenue essentially flat over 3 years (last 12 months sales -4% on a year earlier). Operating margin stuck at 3-5%, no margin improvement despite technical textiles claims. AI insight shows capacity utilization DOWN 85%→78%, ROCE down 15.7%→12.3%, working capital days UP 85→93. Q2 FY2025 showed -12% on the previous quarter revenue, -25% on the previous quarter profit. CRITICAL: "Mundra 50,000 MT capacity" cited in briefing's AI insight was NOT independently verified, EduInvesting only confirms 37,707 spindles at Kadi, Gujarat. Management guidance of 10% revenue growth not credible against 3-year flat revenue.

Regulatory and governance record

No direct fraud or regulatory action found.

Checked 22 March 2026.

Pashupati Cotspin Ltd earned a ROCE of 10% in FY26. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 4.2 percentage points below its cost of capital, so growth here does not yet pay for the capital it uses. It comes from a 1.5% net margin and 2.24× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 1.5% net margin × 2.24× asset turnover × 1.87× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 6.3% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 7.8% − 12.0% = −4.2 percentage points. The 12.0% is a standard assumption for the cost of capital in India, not an estimate for this company. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Negative: growth at these returns loses value until returns improve.

The 7.8% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY26 at 6.1%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method.

Pashupati Cotspin Ltd has total debt of ₹99.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹164 Cr as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 0.60× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from 1.64 in FY22 to 0.60 in FY26. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

Promoters cut their stake in Pashupati Cotspin Ltd by 4.1 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Promoters now own 66.0% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +4.1 points over the same period, to 12.7%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Promoters: −4.1 points over 8 quarters, to 66.0%; Foreign institutions: +4.1 points over 8 quarters, to 12.7%; Domestic institutions: +0.2 points over 8 quarters, to 0.2%.

Why the owners changed: promoters drove it (−4.1 points), with the other side taken by foreign institutions (+4.1 points). They reduced their stake.

For Pashupati Cotspin Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

49.8 out of 100, rank 9 of 13 in Textiles - Spinning, with 96% of the evidence available.

Pashupati Cotspin Ltd scores 49.8 out of 100 against the 13 companies it is compared with in Textiles - Spinning, ranking 9. Relative strength against the index is 59.9%, and revenue and profit growth are weak.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 9.6 + 10.6 + 9.6 + 20 = 49.8. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.