Bondada Engineering share price today

Bondada Engineering Ltd's share price was ₹276.65 at the close on 6 November 2026. It has been falling for 87 weeks. That is 12.1% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹242 and ₹413, and at that close it sat 20% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Bondada Engineering Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the NIFTY 500, and it has been behind for 1 week running.

Over the last 3.2 years the share price moved +744% while the NIFTY 500 moved +27%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 30 October 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Two changes stood out: foreign funds (FIIs) cut their stake for 5 quarters in a row and number of shareholders up 33% in a year.

1. Foreign funds (FIIs) cut their stake for 5 quarters in a row

   From 1.4% to 0.4% of the company by the September 2026 quarter.

2. Number of shareholders up 33% in a year

   18,621 shareholders in the September 2026 quarter, against 13,973 a year earlier.

For April to June 2026 (the quarter ended 30 June 2026), Bondada Engineering reported revenue of ₹692 crore, up 24.0% from ₹558 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹54.0 crore, up 28.6% from ₹42.0 crore.

Bondada Engineering results: April to June 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for July to September 2026, are due by 14 November 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

The newest call in our records is from 28 April 2026, about January to March 2026; a call about these results is not in our records yet.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 June 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Bondada Engineering closed at ₹276.65 on 6 November 2026, down 33.5% from ₹416.15 a year earlier (7 November 2025) and up 277.5% over three years. Its highest weekly close since September 2023 was ₹688.99 on 30 August 2024.

Bondada Engineering share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 6 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

149 weekly closes from 1 September 2023 to 6 November 2026.

6 Nov 2026: Bondada Engineering closed at ₹276.65, up 1.4% on the week and down 4.1% on the month. Results for April to June 2026: Revenue up 24.0% and profit up 28.6% on a year earlier.

Earlier

• 28 Apr 2026: Bondada Engineering held its results call for January to March 2026.

The NSE corporate-actions record has no dividend for Bondada Engineering since its first NSE close in our records (1 September 2023), so this page cannot show amounts per share.

Yes. Bondada Engineering Ltd paid out 2% of its profit as dividends in FY26, and it paid a dividend in 5 of its last 8 reported years.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 7 November 2026.

On the call for January to March 2026, held on 28 April 2026, Bondada Engineering's management spoke about the quarter; the main points are below.

“We want to shift our ratio of EPC to products from 90:10 to 70:30. Defense products offer higher margins and the opportunity for intellectual property-based exclusivity”Management, on the call for January to March 2026

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for January to March 2026, 28 April 2026. The April to June 2026 results are out since, so this part may be out of date until we update it.

Bondada Engineering is on one of our India lists: AI & data centre stocks.

Bondada Engineering Ltd earned ₹54.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +28.6% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 3rd quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹211 Cr. Over 7 years profit has grown 52.5% a year on average. That is 7.8% of the quarter's revenue.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹42.0 Cr.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹211 Cr (+86.7% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +24.0% on a year earlier and the margin moved −1.0 percentage points. Sales did the work, and the margin was about flat.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +52.4% and revenue +47.1%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra rupee of revenue adds more to profit.

Bondada Engineering Ltd reported ₹692 Cr of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +24.0% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 3rd quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 7 years it has grown 43.8% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹2,843 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹2,977 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹2,843 Cr, +81.0% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +47.1% on average, against 43.8% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

Bondada Engineering Ltd's operating margin was 11.0% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 1.0 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Its latest full-year margin is the highest it has ever reported. Across 8 years it has been between 6.0% and 12.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −0.4 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +8.1 points. So the drop came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

As noted under valuation: when margins are at a record, every ratio built on profit looks better than usual, so a low multiple can mislead.

Over the last 3 years, 8% of Bondada Engineering Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, a gap worth watching. In FY26 it brought in ₹125 Cr of operating cash against ₹211 Cr of profit. After ₹52.0 Cr of spending on assets, ₹73.0 Cr was left over as free cash.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 8% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 69 days shorter between FY21 and FY26, so cash that used to wait in the business now arrives sooner. When less than 70% of profit comes in as cash, it is the thing to watch on this page.

What to look at next: the bigger use of cash is spending on new assets, at 9.6× depreciation over three years. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Bondada Engineering Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 138 days in FY26, down from 207 days in FY21. It spent ₹173 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 102 days to pay, and stock sits for 134 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹2,843 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹7.8 Cr, so roughly ₹1,075 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 102 days to pay and stock sat for 134 days, about 4.4 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of 138 days, shorter than FY21's 207.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 134 days. Customers pay about 102 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 97 days. Together that makes the 138-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹173 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹18.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹16.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Bondada Engineering Ltd's P/E is 14.1×, about the lowest it has ever been. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 44.6×, over 3.2 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Keep one thing in mind: margins are the best this company has ever reported. A multiple that looks low against its own past can mislead when profit is at a record. If margins fall back, today's multiple is higher than it looks.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +82.8% while the price moved −33.5%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

Where the price move came from: over 3 years the price moved +55.7% a year; about +127.7% a year came from earnings growth and about −72.0 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source has, is not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 13% on reported income across 6 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Bondada Engineering Ltd's business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 4 quarters of 1 measure, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction.

One or more growth lines have an extreme jump caused by comparing with a near-zero or loss-making quarter. Those jumps are capped before reading and drawn at the edge of the chart, so one odd quarter does not decide the result.

The return figures here are yearly, not quarterly. They show level and direction only; they can support the growth lines but never decide the reading alone.

There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Bondada Engineering Ltd earned a ROCE of 39% in FY26. That is up from a low of 16% in FY21. We cannot compare its return on capital used with its cost of capital from the data we have. It comes from a 7.4% net margin and 1.39× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 7.4% net margin × 1.39× asset turnover × 2.94× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 30.2% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it.

The quarterly return lines and the return-on-capital-used (ROIC) line, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 13% on reported income across 6 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Bondada Engineering Ltd had ₹292 Cr of borrowings against ₹694 Cr of equity in FY26, so its debt is 0.42× its equity. Its operating profit is 7 times its interest bill. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹47.0 Cr to ₹292 Cr. Over the last 3 of those years it spent ₹173 Cr on assets.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Interest cover shows how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low debt and high cover are the safe combination.

Part of the spending on assets is being paid for with borrowed money.

The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 13% on reported income across 6 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Promoters cut their stake in Bondada Engineering Ltd by 1.8 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Promoters now own 61.5% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −0.4 points over the same period, to 0.4%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Promoters: −1.8 points over 8 quarters, to 61.5%; Foreign institutions: −0.4 points over 8 quarters, to 0.4%; Domestic institutions: +0.2 points over 8 quarters, to 0.2%.

Why the owners changed: promoters drove it (−1.8 points). They reduced their stake.

For Bondada Engineering Ltd, the Z-score is left out, because it comes from the second data source we could not check, and a safety score is not worth showing when two sources disagree. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

61.5 out of 100, rank 7 of 8 in Infra - Engineering - General, with 50% of the evidence available. It is provisional, so it is ranked below companies with full evidence.

Bondada Engineering Ltd scores 61.5 out of 100 against the 8 companies it is compared with in Infra - Engineering - General, ranking 7. Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 18.1 + 19.8 + 15 + 8.6 = 61.5. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

Bondada Engineering ranks 7 of 8 Infra - Engineering - General companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 61.5 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Infra - Engineering - General, all 8 compared on one page.

Bondada Engineering is the 4th largest of 8 Infra - Engineering - General companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Engineers India, Ircon International and ISGEC Heavy Engineering. Just below it: BGR Energy Systems, EMS and Axtel Industries.

Infra - Engineering - General companies close in size

1. Engineers India Ltd ₹16,785 crore
2. Ircon International Ltd ₹9,088 crore
3. ISGEC Heavy Engineering Ltd ₹7,170 crore
4. Bondada Engineering Ltd ₹2,943 crore
5. BGR Energy Systems Ltd ₹2,034 crore
6. EMS Ltd ₹1,560 crore
7. Axtel Industries Ltd ₹666 crore

All 8 Infra - Engineering - General companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

1057. Axis Solutions Ltd ₹2,947 crore · Engineering - Light - General
1058. Jaykay Enterprises Ltd ₹2,947 crore · Aerospace & Defence - Equipments
1059. Bondada Engineering Ltd ₹2,943 crore
1060. Anand Rathi Share & Stock Brokers Ltd ₹2,927 crore · Finance - Capital Markets - Brokers
1061. Jindal Poly Films Ltd ₹2,924 crore · Packaging - BOPP

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 6 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.