Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-17
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-17

The Williams Companies, Inc.

WMB
Energy · Oil & Gas Midstream

The Williams Companies, Inc.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

Biggest watch item: the price is already 39 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (39 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 56th percentile of its own 5-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +51.7% year on year, and 200% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.

Stage
Turning around
fundamental trajectory, 12 quarters
Price
$70.9
+18.0% 1Y
P/E
28.3×
56th pctile
of its own 5-year range
Revenue (Jun 26)
$3.0 B
+9.7% YoY
Profit (Jun 26)
$0.9 B
+51.7% YoY
Operating margin
38.7%
+4.9 pp YoY
ROE
22%
FY25
ROIC
8.0%
vs WACC 6.6% → +1.4 pp
Cash conversion
200%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

The Williams Companies, Inc. trades at $70.9, in a confirmed uptrend and 39 weeks into that stage. That is +0.4% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 64% of a 52-week range of $57 to $78. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (3 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 39 of stage 2. At $70.9 it trades +0.4% versus its 200-day average and sits at 64% of its 52-week range ($57–$78).

Sep 26: $70.9 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
+0.4% versus the 200-day line, week 39 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S3S2S2$82.2$68.7$55.1$41.6$28.0$$71$71Sep 23Jun 24Mar 25Dec 25Sep 26
S3S2S2$82.2$68.7$55.1$41.6$28.0$$71$71Sep 23Mar 25Sep 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (533 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Jul 16Sep 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.2 years the stock moved +238% while the S&P 500 moved +255% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (3 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-08-28) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

The Williams Companies, Inc. trades at 28.3× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (56th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 26.3×, measured across 4.5 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 28.3× is mid-range by its own standards (56th percentile), against a long-run median of 26.3× measured over 4.5 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 28.3× vs a 26.3× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly step line (right axis). 4.5-year window; loss-period spikes above 34× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
mid-range by its own standards (56th percentile)
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
35.9×$2.730.1×$2.024.4×$1.418.6×$0.712.9×$0.0×$28.25×$3Apr 22May 23Jun 24Aug 25Sep 26
35.9×$2.730.1×$2.024.4×$1.418.6×$0.712.9×$0.0×$28.25×$3Apr 22Jun 24Sep 26
PEG 1.35 PEG ratio per quarter — the P/E divided by the earnings-growth rate. The dashed line marks 1.0: below it the growth is cheap against the multiple, above it the price already prices the growth in. Last 20 quarters; values above 6 pinned at the top.
above 1.0, the multiple already banks the growth
PEGPEG = 1.0
6.4×5.0×3.5×2.0×0.6××1.35×Sep 21Sep 22Dec 23Mar 25Jun 26
6.4×5.0×3.5×2.0×0.6××1.35×Sep 21Dec 23Jun 26
P/E
28.3×
56th percentile of 5y
PEG
1.11
as reported

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +17.6% against a +18.0% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +27.3%/yr price move, ~+7.2%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+20.1 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: Turning around

Stage: Turning around Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

The Williams Companies, Inc. reads as turning around on its fundamental arc. Turning around — profit growth swung from −19.3% at the trough to +26.1%, a 5-quarter improving streak, ROCE holding at 8.9%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +13.8% in FY25, profit +17.9% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
15%63%10%38%5.0%13%0.0%−12%−5.2%−37%%%13.8%17.9%FY21FY23FY25
15%63%10%38%5.0%13%0.0%−12%−5.2%−37%%%13.8%17.9%FY21FY23FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue stabilising, profit accelerating
RevenueProfitEPS
16%62%9.0%38%2.3%13%−4.4%−11%−11%−36%%%8.7%26.1%26.8%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
16%62%9.0%38%2.3%13%−4.4%−11%−11%−36%%%8.7%26.1%26.8%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
9.9%9.1%8.3%7.6%6.8%%8.9%Sep 23Mar 24Dec 24Sep 25Jun 26
9.9%9.1%8.3%7.6%6.8%%8.9%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
Revenue growth
Flat
latest +8.7% · span −9.2% to +13.8%
Profit growth
Rising
latest +26.1% · span −28.8% to +55.7%
EPS growth
Rising
latest +26.8% · span −16.5% to +41.6%
ROCE
Stuck low
latest 8.9% · span 7.0%–9.7%

Why it matters: growth inflections are where re-ratings start — the curves say a turn is forming, so the question becomes whether the next quarters confirm it.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+13.8%+2.9%
Profit+17.9%+9.3%
EPS+17.6%+8.6%
Stock price+18.0%+27.3%+22.9%+9.1%
Revenue YoY (Jun 26)
+9.7%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Jun 26)
+51.7%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
3.0%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

45.5/100 — rank 18 of 30 in Oil & Gas Midstream · 85% evidence confidence

The Williams Companies, Inc. scores 45.5 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Oil & Gas Midstream, ranking 18. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 22.1 + 10.9 + 9.7 + 2.8 = 45.5. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The Williams Companies, Inc. reported $3.0 B of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +9.7% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at 3.0% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $11.9 B. The last four reported quarters add to $12.2 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $11.9 B (+13.8% on the year), capping 4 years at 3.0% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed $3.0 B, +9.7% year on year.

FY25 revenue $11.9 B (+13.8% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
3.0% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
1315%9.710%6.55.0%3.20.0%0.0−5.2%$ B%$12B13.8%FY21FY23FY25
1315%9.710%6.55.0%3.20.0%0.0−5.2%$ B%$12B13.8%FY21FY23FY25
Jun 26: $3.0 B (+9.7% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
3.522%2.612%1.71.8%0.9−8.1%0.0−18%$ B%$3B9.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
3.522%2.612%1.71.8%0.9−8.1%0.0−18%$ B%$3B9.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +9.0% growth against the decade's 3.0% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +8.7% over the last 4 quarters against +8.0%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit +26.1% vs +5.0%/yr — accelerating.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

The Williams Companies, Inc.'s operating margin is 38.7% in the Jun 26 quarter, +4.9 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 24.7% to 39.5%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 38.7%, +4.9 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 24.7%–39.5%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +4.9 pp year on year while gross margin went +1.4 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

FY25: 35.1% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
within a 24.7–39.5% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
41%13%36%7.8%32%2.1%28%−3.6%24%−9.3%%%35.1%3.3%FY21FY23FY25
41%13%36%7.8%32%2.1%28%−3.6%24%−9.3%%%35.1%3.3%FY21FY23FY25
Jun 26: 38.7% operating margin (+4.9 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
45%13%40%6.9%36%0.5%32%−5.8%28%−12%%%38.7%4.9%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
45%13%40%6.9%36%0.5%32%−5.8%28%−12%%%38.7%4.9%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

The Williams Companies, Inc. earned $0.9 B of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +51.7% year on year. It is the 3rd consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $2.8 B. The 4-year compound rate is 15.4%. That is 28.9% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.6 B.

Jun 26 profit was $0.9 B, +51.7% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY25 printed $2.8 B (+17.9%), and the 4-year compound rate is 15.4%.

FY25 profit $2.8 B (+17.9% YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
15.4% a year over 4 years
Net profitYoY growth
3.662%2.738%1.813%0.9−11%0.0−36%$ B%$3B17.9%FY21FY23FY25
3.662%2.738%1.813%0.9−11%0.0−36%$ B%$3B17.9%FY21FY23FY25
Jun 26: $0.9 B (+51.7% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
3rd straight quarter of growth
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
1.377%0.941%0.65.8%0.3−30%0.0−65%$ B%$1B51.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
1.377%0.941%0.65.8%0.3−30%0.0−65%$ B%$1B51.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +9.7% and the margin +4.9 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +29.1% vs revenue +9.0%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra dollar of revenue drops more to the bottom line.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 200% of The Williams Companies, Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $5.9 B of operating cash against $2.8 B of profit. After $4.9 B of capital spending, $1.0 B was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of $5.9 B against reported profit of $2.8 B, leaving free cash of $1.0 B after $4.9 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 200% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $5.9 B vs profit $2.8 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
200% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
6.44.83.21.60.0$ B$6B$3B$1BFY21FY23FY25
6.44.83.21.60.0$ B$6B$3B$1BFY21FY23FY25
Jun 26: operating cash $1.4 B = 157% of the quarter's profit Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)Conversion100%
2.0314%1.5256%1.0199%0.5142%0.084%$ B%$1B157%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
2.0314%1.5256%1.0199%0.5142%0.084%$ B%$1B157%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

The Williams Companies, Inc. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $10.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 27.9% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $10.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $4.9 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
5.34.02.61.30.0$ B$5BFY21FY23FY25
5.34.02.61.30.0$ B$5BFY21FY23FY25
Jun 26: capex $1.8 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 12 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)Free cash
2.11.31.60.81.10.30.5−0.10.0−0.6$ B$ B$2B$−1BSep 23Dec 24Jun 26
2.11.31.60.81.10.30.5−0.10.0−0.6$ B$ B$2B$−1BSep 23Dec 24Jun 26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

The Williams Companies, Inc. earns a ROE of 19% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 11% in FY21. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +1.4 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 23.2% net margin on 0.20× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is 19%, recovered from a FY21 trough of 11% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 23.2% net margin × 0.20× asset turns × 3.91× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 18.1% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 8.0% − 6.6% = a +1.4 pp spread. The 6.6% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Positive but thin — value creation with little room for error.

FY25: ROE 19% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 6.6% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY21's 11%
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
24%19%14%8.9%4.1%%18.5%7.5%FY21FY23FY25
24%19%14%8.9%4.1%%18.5%7.5%FY21FY23FY25
Jun 26: ROIC 8.0% (TTM) vs WACC 6.6% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
25%20%15%10%5.2%%8%21.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
25%20%15%10%5.2%%8%21.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
11 · Dividend

Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.

The Williams Companies, Inc. paid $2.05 per share over the last four reported quarters. The most recent declaration was $0.53 for Jun 26. Against the current price of $70.9 that is a trailing yield of 2.89%, measured on dividends already paid rather than on a forecast.

The Williams Companies, Inc. paid $2.05 per share across the last four reported quarters, most recently $0.53 for Jun 26. Against the current price of $70.9 the trailing twelve months work out to 2.89% — trailing dividends measured against today's price, not a forward estimate.

Dividend per share by quarter Declared dividend per share, $ B, per reported quarter. 12 quarters on file.
latest $0.53 (Jun 26)
Dividend per share
0.60.40.30.10.0$ B$1BSep 23Mar 24Dec 24Sep 25Jun 26
0.60.40.30.10.0$ B$1BSep 23Dec 24Jun 26
12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

The Williams Companies, Inc. carries total debt of $30.8 B against shareholder equity of $15.4 B as of Jun 26, a debt-to-equity of 2.00. On the annual view that ratio went from 1.68 in FY21 to 1.96 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Jun 26: total debt of $30.8 B against shareholder equity of $15.4 B — a debt-to-equity of 2.00. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 1.68 (FY21) to 1.96 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

FY25: debt $29.4 B at 1.96× equity Total debt by fiscal year, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
322.0×241.9×161.8×7.91.7×0.01.6×$ B×$29B1.96×FY21FY23FY25
322.0×241.9×161.8×7.91.7×0.01.6×$ B×$29B1.96×FY21FY23FY25
Jun 26: debt $30.8 B, debt-to-equity 2.00 Total debt per quarter, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
332.02×251.95×171.89×8.31.83×0.01.76×$ B×$31B2.00×Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
332.02×251.95×171.89×8.31.83×0.01.76×$ B×$31B2.00×Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

2.1% of The Williams Companies, Inc.'s tradable float is currently sold short — some money is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 3.7 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

The latest reading: 2.1% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 3.7 days to buy those positions back. Some money is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.

Short interest
2.1%
of the tradable float
Days to cover
3.7
at typical volumes

Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

The Williams Companies, Inc.: the Z-score reads 1.18. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits inside the distress zone. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

🚨 Why it matters: a Z-score of 1.18 is inside the distress zone — the balance sheet is a real risk, not a detail.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 1.18.

15 · Related companies · Oil & Gas Midstream
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Frontline plcFRO 80.9/100Sector-leading setup81% evidence BREAKING OUT 29.2/35 Revenue 18.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 60.1 pp 83% evidence 16.8/25 ROCE 10.8% · OPM 81.9% 76% evidence 15.5/20 P/E 8.6× · PEG 0.19 65% evidence 19.4/20 RS sector 41.1% · RS bench 54.4% · 1Y 131.2%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 29.2 + 16.8 + 15.5 + 19.4 = 80.9 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2International Seaways, Inc.INSW 78.2/100Favorable setup81% evidence BREAKING OUT 27.0/35 Revenue 14.5% · PAT 69.3% · OPM change 57.6 pp 83% evidence 16.5/25 ROCE 11.2% · OPM 89.9% 76% evidence 16.4/20 P/E 6.6× · PEG 0.09 65% evidence 18.3/20 RS sector 32.3% · RS bench 44.6% · 1Y 129.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 27 + 16.5 + 16.4 + 18.3 = 78.2 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
3BW LPG LimitedBWLP 73.5/100Favorable setup81% evidence BREAKING OUT 24.7/35 Revenue 5.1% · PAT 31.4% · OPM change 23.6 pp 83% evidence 14.5/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 26.2% 76% evidence 15.4/20 P/E 7.3× · PEG 0.28 65% evidence 18.9/20 RS sector 27.3% · RS bench 39.6% · 1Y 68.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.7 + 14.5 + 15.4 + 18.9 = 73.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Venture Global, Inc.VG 69.6/100Favorable setup85% evidence BREAKING OUT 23.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 14.3 pp 95% evidence 11.7/25 ROCE 4.3% · OPM 47.8% 76% evidence 15.8/20 P/E 8.8× · PEG 0.14 65% evidence 18.7/20 RS sector 10.9% · RS bench 21.1% · 1Y 10.6%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.4 + 11.7 + 15.8 + 18.7 = 69.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Cmb.Tech NVCMBT 67.0/100Favorable setup71% evidence BREAKING OUT 24.0/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 12.5% · OPM change 40.9 pp 83% evidence 12.7/25 ROCE 5.8% · OPM 84.6% 76% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 7.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 19.1/20 RS sector 27.5% · RS bench 40% · 1Y 113.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24 + 12.7 + 11.2 + 19.1 = 67 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.CQP 66.7/100Favorable setup85% evidence BREAKING OUT 26.8/35 Revenue 15.4% · PAT 28.1% · OPM change 22.8 pp 95% evidence 15.1/25 ROCE 8.5% · OPM 51.9% 76% evidence 14.7/20 P/E 11.1× · PEG 0.33 65% evidence 10.1/20 RS sector -7.3% · RS bench 2.7% · 1Y 25.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26.8 + 15.1 + 14.7 + 10.1 = 66.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7Scorpio Tankers Inc.STNG 61.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 23.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 42 pp 45% evidence 14.9/25 ROCE 9.8% · OPM 70.2% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 4.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.4/20 RS sector 4.5% · RS bench 15.2% · 1Y 45.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.1 + 14.9 + 11.5 + 12.4 = 61.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Cheniere Energy, Inc.LNG 59.5/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence BREAKING OUT 19.8/35 Revenue 17.5% · PAT -11.8% · OPM change 20.3 pp 95% evidence 14.8/25 ROCE 10.2% · OPM 74.8% 76% evidence 12.0/20 P/E 17.8× · PEG 0.9 65% evidence 12.9/20 RS sector -4.8% · RS bench 5.2% · 1Y 15.7%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.8 + 14.8 + 12 + 12.9 = 59.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9Targa Resources Corp.TRGP 57.3/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence BREAKING OUT 18.7/35 Revenue -2% · PAT 29.6% · OPM change 3.5 pp 95% evidence 12.4/25 ROCE 5.4% · OPM 27.8% 76% evidence 12.4/20 P/E 25.6× · PEG 0.51 65% evidence 13.8/20 RS sector 7.3% · RS bench 17.7% · 1Y 73.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.7 + 12.4 + 12.4 + 13.8 = 57.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10Energy Transfer LPET 55.8/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence BREAKING OUT 20.3/35 Revenue 33.3% · PAT 16.1% · OPM change -1.6 pp 95% evidence 10.5/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 10.4% 76% evidence 12.3/20 P/E 13× · PEG 0.93 65% evidence 12.7/20 RS sector -4.3% · RS bench 6.1% · 1Y 22%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.3 + 10.5 + 12.3 + 12.7 = 55.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.PAA 52.8/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence TURNING 16.8/35 Revenue -7.1% · PAT 45.4% · OPM change 0.1 pp 83% evidence 6.5/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 3.2% 76% evidence 13.1/20 P/E 18.5× · PEG 0.49 65% evidence 16.4/20 RS sector 4.1% · RS bench 14.8% · 1Y 49.4%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.8 + 6.5 + 13.1 + 16.4 = 52.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 14.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
12Western Midstream Partners, LPWES 51.9/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence BREAKING OUT 13.8/35 Revenue 11.4% · PAT -6.5% · OPM change -2.9 pp 83% evidence 13.3/25 ROCE 3.8% · OPM 41.8% 76% evidence 15.0/20 P/E 13.5× · PEG 0.17 65% evidence 9.8/20 RS sector -6.6% · RS bench 3.7% · 1Y 22.2%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.8 + 13.3 + 15 + 9.8 = 51.9 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
13Kinetik Holdings Inc.KNTK 49.8/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence BREAKING OUT 15.5/35 Revenue 9.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change -5.2 pp 83% evidence 4.7/25 ROCE -0.1% · OPM -0.9% 76% evidence 14.0/20 P/E 19.8× · PEG 0.27 65% evidence 15.6/20 RS sector 3.4% · RS bench 14% · 1Y 25.4%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.5 + 4.7 + 14 + 15.6 = 49.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 14%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
14Golar LNG LimitedGLNG 49.4/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence TURNING 27.8/35 Revenue 81.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 76.5 pp 83% evidence 10.3/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 81.8% 76% evidence 4.4/20 P/E 42.3× · PEG 2.76 65% evidence 6.9/20 RS sector -7.1% · RS bench 2.4% · 1Y 28.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 27.8 + 10.3 + 4.4 + 6.9 = 49.4 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -7.1% and the one-year return is 28.6%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
15ONEOK, Inc.OKE 47.9/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence TURNING 16.1/35 Revenue 40.8% · PAT 13.1% · OPM change -4.9 pp 95% evidence 10.3/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 13.2% 76% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 15× · PEG 1.15 65% evidence 10.7/20 RS sector -5.3% · RS bench 4.6% · 1Y 29.6%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.1 + 10.3 + 10.8 + 10.7 = 47.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16Hess Midstream LPHESM 46.7/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence TURNING 12.2/35 Revenue 7% · PAT 3.6% · OPM change -1.1 pp 83% evidence 14.8/25 ROCE 5.8% · OPM 61% 76% evidence 11.8/20 P/E 13.4× · PEG 1.01 65% evidence 7.9/20 RS sector -10% · RS bench -0.1% · 1Y 11.9%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.2 + 14.8 + 11.8 + 7.9 = 46.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
17Kinder Morgan, Inc.KMI 46.4/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence ASLEEP 21.6/35 Revenue 12.5% · PAT 26.1% · OPM change 1.6 pp 95% evidence 10.3/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 30.1% 76% evidence 12.4/20 P/E 20.5× · PEG 0.73 65% evidence 2.1/20 RS sector -14.9% · RS bench -5.7% · 1Y 12.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.6 + 10.3 + 12.4 + 2.1 = 46.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
18The Williams Companies, Inc.this pageWMB 45.5/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence ASLEEP 22.1/35 Revenue 8.7% · PAT 26.2% · OPM change 4.7 pp 95% evidence 10.9/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 38.7% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 29.6× · PEG 1.11 65% evidence 2.8/20 RS sector -12.8% · RS bench -3.5% · 1Y 18%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.1 + 10.9 + 9.7 + 2.8 = 45.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
19Plains GP Holdings, L.P.PAGP 43.4/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence BREAKING OUT 12.8/35 Revenue -7.1% · PAT — · OPM change 0.1 pp 62% evidence 4.0/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 3.2% 76% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 25× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.2/20 RS sector 5.6% · RS bench 16.3% · 1Y 51.4%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.8 + 4 + 9.4 + 17.2 = 43.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 16.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
20Pembina Pipeline CorporationPBA 43.3/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence TURNING 9.5/35 Revenue -1.3% · PAT -4.2% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence 14.6/25 ROCE 7.7% · OPM 34% 76% evidence 13.3/20 P/E 23.1× · PEG 0.33 65% evidence 5.9/20 RS sector -8.9% · RS bench 0.9% · 1Y 17.8%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 9.5 + 14.6 + 13.3 + 5.9 = 43.3 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
21South Bow CorporationSOBO 42.7/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 12.7/35 Revenue -4.6% · PAT 44.5% · OPM change -3.1 pp 83% evidence 9.8/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 32.6% 76% evidence 13.5/20 P/E 16.4× · PEG 0.36 65% evidence 6.7/20 RS sector -6.1% · RS bench 3.7% · 1Y 27.3%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.7 + 9.8 + 13.5 + 6.7 = 42.7 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
22MPLX LPMPLX 40.8/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence BREAKING OUT 12.2/35 Revenue 4.8% · PAT 9.6% · OPM change -1.4 pp 95% evidence 12.6/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 38.3% 76% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 12.1× · PEG 1.16 65% evidence 4.9/20 RS sector -12.5% · RS bench -2.6% · 1Y 15.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.2 + 12.6 + 11.1 + 4.9 = 40.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
23Enterprise Products Partners L.P.EPD 40.6/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence TURNING 13.8/35 Revenue 6.8% · PAT 7.5% · OPM change -3.5 pp 95% evidence 11.5/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 12.3% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 12.7× · PEG 1.8 65% evidence 6.4/20 RS sector -9.4% · RS bench 0.4% · 1Y 20.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.8 + 11.5 + 8.9 + 6.4 = 40.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
24Antero Midstream CorporationAM 40.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 15.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.9 pp 45% evidence 13.0/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 60% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 27.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 2.5/20 RS sector -13% · RS bench -3.7% · 1Y 14%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.8 + 13 + 9.1 + 2.5 = 40.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
25DT Midstream, Inc.DTM 37.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.6 pp 45% evidence 10.7/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 49.4% 76% evidence 8.6/20 P/E 32.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 0.3/20 RS sector -18.9% · RS bench -10.1% · 1Y 16.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 10.7 + 8.6 + 0.3 = 37.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
26Viper Energy, Inc.VNOM 35.4/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 11.4/35 Revenue 84.3% · PAT -121.9% · OPM change -13.8 pp 83% evidence 10.8/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 49.5% 76% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 15.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.1/20 RS sector -14.1% · RS bench -4.8% · 1Y 15.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.4 + 10.8 + 10.1 + 3.1 = 35.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
27TC Energy CorporationTRP 34.0/100Adverse evidence85% evidence ASLEEP 13.0/35 Revenue 9.7% · PAT -14.8% · OPM change 0.9 pp 95% evidence 8.3/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 44.3% 76% evidence 11.9/20 P/E 28.1× · PEG 0.7 65% evidence 0.8/20 RS sector -15.3% · RS bench -6.1% · 1Y 16.3%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13 + 8.3 + 11.9 + 0.8 = 34 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
28Excelerate Energy, Inc.EE 31.7/100Adverse evidence81% evidence FADING 13.6/35 Revenue 39.4% · PAT -6.8% · OPM change -2 pp 83% evidence 8.9/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 18.9% 76% evidence 4.0/20 P/E 27.2× · PEG 3.91 65% evidence 5.2/20 RS sector -9% · RS bench 0.5% · 1Y 49.6%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.6 + 8.9 + 4 + 5.2 = 31.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
29Enbridge Inc.ENB 24.3/100Adverse evidence85% evidence BASING 13.4/35 Revenue 29.5% · PAT -8% · OPM change -5.5 pp 95% evidence 6.4/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 9.9% 76% evidence 4.2/20 P/E 29.7× · PEG 2.88 65% evidence 0.3/20 RS sector -20.8% · RS bench -12% · 1Y -2.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.4 + 6.4 + 4.2 + 0.3 = 24.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
30SunocoCorp LLCSUNC 50.8/100Thin evidence · provisional23% evidence BREAKING OUT 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.3 pp 10% evidence 12.4/25 ROCE 6.8% · OPM 8.1% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —8 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 18.4 + 12.4 + 10 + 10 = 50.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is The Williams Companies, Inc.'s stock price today?

The Williams Companies, Inc. trades at $70.9, +18.0% over the past year. The company is valued at $87.0 B. The stock sits at 64% of its 52-week range of $57–$78, +0.4% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 39 weeks in. — as of 17 September 2026.

What were The Williams Companies, Inc.'s latest quarterly results?

The Williams Companies, Inc. reported revenue of $3.0 B and net profit of $0.9 B for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 9.7% and profit rose 51.7% year on year. Earnings per share were $0.68. The operating margin was 38.7%, 4.9 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is The Williams Companies, Inc.'s revenue?

The Williams Companies, Inc. reported revenue of $3.0 B in the Jun 26 quarter, +9.7% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $11.9 B (+13.8%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 3.0% a year. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is The Williams Companies, Inc.'s profit?

The Williams Companies, Inc. earned $0.9 B of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +51.7% year on year — the 3rd straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $2.8 B. The operating margin ran 38.7% in the latest quarter. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is The Williams Companies, Inc.'s market cap?

The Williams Companies, Inc.'s market capitalisation is $87.0 B at a stock price of $70.9. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is The Williams Companies, Inc.'s P/E ratio?

The Williams Companies, Inc. trades at a P/E of 28.3×, at the 56th percentile of its own 5-year range, against a long-run median of 26.3×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 17 September 2026.

Does The Williams Companies, Inc. pay a dividend?

Yes — The Williams Companies, Inc. declared $0.53 per share for Jun 26, and $2.05 per share across the last four reported quarters. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is The Williams Companies, Inc.'s dividend per share?

The Williams Companies, Inc.'s most recently declared dividend is $0.53 per share for Jun 26, giving $2.05 per share over the trailing twelve months. Each figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters for the trailing total. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is The Williams Companies, Inc.'s dividend yield?

The Williams Companies, Inc.'s trailing dividend yield is 2.89%: $2.05 declared per share across the last four reported quarters, against a share price of $70.9. Each quarter’s figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters and divided by the latest close. — as of 17 September 2026.

Is The Williams Companies, Inc. overvalued?

On its own history, The Williams Companies, Inc. looks mid-range: its P/E of 28.3× sits at the 56th percentile of its 5-year range (long-run median 26.3×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 17 September 2026.

Is The Williams Companies, Inc. growing?

Yes — The Williams Companies, Inc. is growing: latest-quarter revenue +9.7% year on year, profit +51.7%, and the margin +4.9 pp at 38.7%. The 4-year compound rates are 3.0% (revenue) and 15.4% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 17 September 2026.

How is The Williams Companies, Inc. performing?

The Williams Companies, Inc. is in a confirmed uptrend, 39 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 9.7% and profit rose 51.7% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 3 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 17 September 2026.

What stage is The Williams Companies, Inc. in?

Turning around — profit growth swung from −19.3% at the trough to +26.1%, a 5-quarter improving streak, ROCE holding at 8.9%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +8.7% latest, profit growth +26.1% latest, eps growth +26.8% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 17 September 2026.

Is The Williams Companies, Inc. in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 39 of stage 2), trading +0.4% versus its 200-day average and at 64% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 17 September 2026.

Is The Williams Companies, Inc. beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view The Williams Companies, Inc. is currently behind the S&P 500 (3 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-08-28), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.2 years the stock moved +238% against the S&P 500's +255% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 17 September 2026.

Will The Williams Companies, Inc.'s stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for The Williams Companies, Inc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $70.9, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 39 weeks in. Its P/E of 28.3× sits at the 56th percentile of its own 5-year range. — as of 17 September 2026.

Is the market betting against The Williams Companies, Inc.?

Somewhat — short interest is 2.1% of The Williams Companies, Inc.'s tradable float, about 3.7 days to cover at typical volumes. A moderate reading: some money is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 17 September 2026.

Does The Williams Companies, Inc. have too much debt?

It carries real leverage — The Williams Companies, Inc.'s debt-to-equity is 2.00. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 17 September 2026.

What is The Williams Companies, Inc.'s capex?

The Williams Companies, Inc. spent $10.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $4.9 B. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is The Williams Companies, Inc.'s cash flow?

The Williams Companies, Inc. generated $5.9 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $1.0 B of free cash flow after $4.9 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $2.8 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 17 September 2026.

Is The Williams Companies, Inc.'s profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 200% of The Williams Companies, Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $5.9 B against reported profit of $2.8 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 17 September 2026.

How financially safe is The Williams Companies, Inc.?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 1.18 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is inside the danger band — a real balance-sheet risk. — as of 17 September 2026.

Where is The Williams Companies, Inc. in its business cycle?

The Williams Companies, Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was 35.1%, against a 5-year band of 24.7%–39.5%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 38.7%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 17 September 2026.

What could break the The Williams Companies, Inc. story?

Biggest watch item: the price is already 39 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 17 September 2026.

Is The Williams Companies, Inc. a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: The Williams Companies, Inc.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 17 September 2026.

Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-17. Every chart on this page is drawn by deterministic code from the raw series — no forecasts, no price opinions, and nothing here is investment advice.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI