Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-17
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-17

Kura Sushi USA, Inc.

KRUS
Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants

Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.

The price is in a downtrend (24 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 30th percentile of its own 1-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.

Price
$35.4
−51.8% 1Y
P/E
596.5×
30th pctile
of its own 1-year range
Revenue (May 26)
$0.1 B
+28.6% YoY
Profit (May 26)
$0.0 B
Operating margin
0.0%
flat YoY
ROE
−1%
FY25
ROIC
−0.7%
vs WACC 7.8% → −8.5 pp
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. trades at $35.4, in a downtrend and 24 weeks into that stage. That is −37.3% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 0% of a 52-week range of $35 to $79. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (24 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 24 of stage 4. At $35.4 it trades −37.3% versus its 200-day average and sits at 0% of its 52-week range ($35–$79).

Sep 26: $35.4 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
−37.3% versus the 200-day line, week 24 of stage 4
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S1S2S1S2S4S4S4$122$98.8$75.5$52.2$29.0$$35$56Sep 23Jun 24Mar 25Dec 25Sep 26
S1S2S1S2S4S4S4$122$98.8$75.5$52.2$29.0$$35$56Sep 23Mar 25Sep 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2019 Each cell is one week from 2019 to now (373 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Aug 19Sep 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 7.1 years the stock moved +45% while the S&P 500 moved +158% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (24 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-04-02) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. trades at 596.5× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 30% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 686.4×, measured across 1.3 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 596.5× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 30% of the time, against a long-run median of 686.4× measured over 1.3 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 596.5× vs a 686.4× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly step line (right axis). 1.3-year window; loss-period spikes above 2,059× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 30% of the time
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
2,193.8×$0.151,705.5×$0.111,217.2×$0.08728.8×$0.04240.5×$0.00×$596.50×$0Jun 23Sep 23Feb 24May 24Oct 24
2,193.8×$0.151,705.5×$0.111,217.2×$0.08728.8×$0.04240.5×$0.00×$596.50×$0Jun 23Feb 24Oct 24
P/E
596.5×
30th percentile of 1y
PEG
n/m
not derivable — 3-year earnings growth unavailable

Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 12 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +16.7% in FY25 Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn. Turnaround-year spikes shown pinned (▲).
Revenue YoYEPS YoY
143%−298.8%109%−299.4%75%−300.0%41%−300.6%7.4%−301.2%%%16.7%FY21FY23FY25
143%−298.8%109%−299.4%75%−300.0%41%−300.6%7.4%−301.2%%%16.7%FY21FY23FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue stabilising
RevenueEPS
35%−273%29%−280%23%−288%16%−295%10%−302%%%23.1%−300%Aug 23Nov 24May 26
35%−273%29%−280%23%−288%16%−295%10%−302%%%23.1%−300%Aug 23Nov 24May 26
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
0.3%−0.7%−1.8%−2.8%−3.8%%0%Aug 23Feb 24Nov 24Aug 25May 26
0.3%−0.7%−1.8%−2.8%−3.8%%0%Aug 23Nov 24May 26
Revenue growth
Rising
latest +23.1% · span +12.0% to +33.3%
ROCE
Stuck low
latest 0.0% · span −3.5%–0.0%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+16.7%+26.0%
Stock price−51.8%−22.8%−4.8%
Revenue YoY (May 26)
+28.6%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
47.0%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

32.6/100 — rank 25 of 29 in Restaurants · 67% evidence confidence

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. scores 32.6 out of 100 against the 29 companies it is compared with in Restaurants, ranking 25. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 18.2 + 4.6 + 8.5 + 1.3 = 32.6. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. reported $0.1 B of revenue in the May 26 quarter, +28.6% year on year. That is the 5th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 47.0% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.3 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.3 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $0.3 B (+16.7% on the year), capping 4 years at 47.0% compound. The latest quarter (May 26) printed $0.1 B, +28.6% year on year — the 5th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY25 revenue $0.3 B (+16.7% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
47.0% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
0.30143%0.23109%0.1575%0.0841%0.007.4%$ B%$0B16.7%FY21FY23FY25
0.30143%0.23109%0.1575%0.0841%0.007.4%$ B%$0B16.7%FY21FY23FY25
May 26: $0.1 B (+28.6% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
5th straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
0.1054%0.0740%0.0525%0.0211%0.00−4.0%$ B%$0B28.6%Aug 23Nov 24May 26
0.1054%0.0740%0.0525%0.0211%0.00−4.0%$ B%$0B28.6%Aug 23Nov 24May 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +23.2% growth against the decade's 47.0% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +23.1% over the last 4 quarters against +20.6%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s operating margin is 0.0% in the May 26 quarter, +0.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −16.7% to 0.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 0.0%, +0.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −16.7%–0.0%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +0.0 pp year on year while gross margin went −3.2 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY25: 0.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
within a −16.7–0.0% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
1.3%18%−3.5%12%−8.3%6.3%−13%0.0%−18%−5.9%%%0%4.2%FY21FY23FY25
1.3%18%−3.5%12%−8.3%6.3%−13%0.0%−18%−5.9%%%0%4.2%FY21FY23FY25
May 26: 0.0% operating margin (+0.0 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
1.1%17%−3.0%8.3%−7.2%0.0%−11%−8.3%−15%−17%%%0%0%Aug 23Nov 24May 26
1.1%17%−3.0%8.3%−7.2%0.0%−11%−8.3%−15%−17%%%0%0%Aug 23Nov 24May 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. earned $0.0 B of net profit in the May 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.0 B. That is 0.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.0 B. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

May 26 profit was $0.0 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.0 B (null).

FY25 profit $0.0 B (null YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profit
0.001−0.002−0.005−0.008−0.011$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
0.001−0.002−0.005−0.008−0.011$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
May 26: $0.0 B (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)
0.001−0.002−0.005−0.008−0.011$ B$0BAug 23Nov 24May 26
0.001−0.002−0.005−0.008−0.011$ B$0BAug 23Nov 24May 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s cash-flow history is too thin to judge how much reported profit converts into cash. In FY25 that was $0.0 B of operating cash against $0.0 B of profit. After $0.1 B of capital spending, $−0.0 B was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.

FY25: operating cash of $0.0 B against reported profit of $0.0 B, leaving free cash of $−0.0 B after $0.1 B of capital spending.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $0.0 B vs profit $0.0 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
0.020.01−0.01−0.02−0.03$ B$0B$0B$0BFY21FY23FY25
0.020.01−0.01−0.02−0.03$ B$0B$0B$0BFY21FY23FY25
May 26: operating cash $0.0 B Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)100%
0.011101.2%0.008100.6%0.005100.0%0.00399.4%0.00098.8%$ B%$0BAug 23Nov 24May 26
0.011101.2%0.008100.6%0.005100.0%0.00399.4%0.00098.8%$ B%$0BAug 23Nov 24May 26

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $0.1 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
0.050.040.030.010.00$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
0.050.040.030.010.00$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
May 26: capex $0.0 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 12 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)Free cash
0.0220.0010.016−0.0020.011−0.0050.005−0.0080.000−0.011$ B$ B$0B$0BAug 23Nov 24May 26
0.0220.0010.016−0.0020.011−0.0050.005−0.0080.000−0.011$ B$ B$0B$0BAug 23Nov 24May 26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. earns a ROE of 0% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −11% in FY21. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −8.5 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 0.0% net margin on 0.65× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is 0%, recovered from a FY21 trough of −11% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 0.0% net margin × 0.65× asset turns × 1.87× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 0.0% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: −0.7% − 7.8% = a −8.5 pp spread. The 7.8% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY25: ROE 0% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 7.8% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY21's −11%
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
9.3%3.8%−1.7%−7.1%−13%%0%−1.8%FY21FY23FY25
9.3%3.8%−1.7%−7.1%−13%%0%−1.8%FY21FY23FY25
May 26: ROIC −1.3% (TTM) vs WACC 7.8% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
8.9%4.9%0.9%−3.0%−7.0%%−1.3%−0.7%Aug 23Nov 24May 26
8.9%4.9%0.9%−3.0%−7.0%%−1.3%−0.7%Aug 23Nov 24May 26
11 · Dividend

Dividend

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. carries total debt of $0.2 B against shareholder equity of $0.2 B as of May 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.91. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.78 in FY21 to 0.74 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

May 26: total debt of $0.2 B against shareholder equity of $0.2 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.91. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.78 (FY21) to 0.74 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

FY25: debt $0.2 B at 0.74× equity Total debt by fiscal year, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
0.181.02×0.140.95×0.090.87×0.050.79×0.000.72×$ B×$0B0.74×FY21FY23FY25
0.181.02×0.140.95×0.090.87×0.050.79×0.000.72×$ B×$0B0.74×FY21FY23FY25
May 26: debt $0.2 B, debt-to-equity 0.91 Total debt per quarter, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
0.230.93×0.170.86×0.110.78×0.060.70×0.000.63×$ B×$0B0.91×Aug 23Nov 24May 26
0.230.93×0.170.86×0.110.78×0.060.70×0.000.63×$ B×$0B0.91×Aug 23Nov 24May 26
13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

22.2% of Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s tradable float is currently sold short — a large bloc is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 10.2 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

The latest reading: 22.2% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 10.2 days to buy those positions back. A large bloc is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.

Short interest
22.2%
of the tradable float
Days to cover
10.2
at typical volumes

Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Kura Sushi USA, Inc.: the Z-score reads 2.58. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits in the grey band between the two. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 2.58 sits in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 2.58.

15 · Related companies · Restaurants
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Brinker International, Inc.EAT 70.3/100Favorable setup81% evidence LEADER 21.6/35 Revenue 11.8% · PAT 38.9% · OPM change 0.3 pp 83% evidence 13.4/25 ROCE 8.3% · OPM 11.3% 76% evidence 15.6/20 P/E 14.4× · PEG 0.35 65% evidence 19.7/20 RS sector 38.4% · RS bench 24.6% · 1Y 54.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.6 + 13.4 + 15.6 + 19.7 = 70.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Darden Restaurants, Inc.DRI 69.9/100Favorable setup85% evidence ASLEEP 24.2/35 Revenue 9.4% · PAT 15.1% · OPM change 0.9 pp 95% evidence 18.0/25 ROCE 16.1% · OPM 14.1% 76% evidence 12.7/20 P/E 19.4× · PEG 1.14 65% evidence 15.0/20 RS sector 8.7% · RS bench -2.3% · 1Y 12.6%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.2 + 18 + 12.7 + 15 = 69.9 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
3Restaurant Brands International Inc.QSR 69.3/100Favorable setup85% evidence TURNING 26.1/35 Revenue 6.5% · PAT 51.4% · OPM change 8.4 pp 95% evidence 13.8/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 28.4% 76% evidence 14.5/20 P/E 19.5× · PEG 0.48 65% evidence 14.9/20 RS sector 7.2% · RS bench -3.5% · 1Y 17.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26.1 + 13.8 + 14.5 + 14.9 = 69.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Domino's Pizza, Inc.DPZ 62.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 23.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.1 pp 45% evidence 21.1/25 ROCE 35.8% · OPM 20% 76% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 18.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.1/20 RS sector -15.6% · RS bench -24.4% · 1Y -29.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.5 + 21.1 + 10.9 + 7.1 = 62.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Yum! Brands, Inc.YUM 62.0/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence ASLEEP 23.6/35 Revenue 10.3% · PAT 54.8% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence 18.1/25 ROCE 14.4% · OPM 30.2% 76% evidence 15.1/20 P/E 20.1× · PEG 0.35 65% evidence 5.2/20 RS sector -6.4% · RS bench -15.9% · 1Y -5.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.6 + 18.1 + 15.1 + 5.2 = 62 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -6.4% and the one-year return is -5.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
6The Cheesecake Factory IncorporatedCAKE 61.0/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence LEADER 19.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.4 pp 39% evidence 11.3/25 ROCE 6.5% · OPM 5.6% 76% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 21.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 19.5/20 RS sector 50.9% · RS bench 36.1% · 1Y 77.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.9 + 11.3 + 10.3 + 19.5 = 61 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc.ARCO 59.7/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 23.3/35 Revenue 7.9% · PAT 74.1% · OPM change 1 pp 83% evidence 9.9/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 5.2% 76% evidence 16.5/20 P/E 7.4× · PEG 0.18 65% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector 0.6% · RS bench -9.4% · 1Y 14.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 23.3 + 9.9 + 16.5 + 10 = 59.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.LOCO 55.4/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence FADING 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.7 pp 45% evidence 10.1/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 9.7% 76% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 14.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.7/20 RS sector 17.7% · RS bench 6.2% · 1Y 46.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.4 + 10.1 + 11.2 + 15.7 = 55.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9Yum China Holdings, Inc.YUMC 50.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 19.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.3 pp 45% evidence 13.2/25 ROCE 4% · OPM 13.7% 76% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 15× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.9/20 RS sector -8.4% · RS bench -17.8% · 1Y -5.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.5 + 13.2 + 11 + 6.9 = 50.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
10Texas Roadhouse, Inc.TXRH 50.2/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 14.8/35 Revenue 13.1% · PAT 2.5% · OPM change -3.1 pp 53% evidence 12.9/25 ROCE 5.6% · OPM 9% 76% evidence 13.5/20 P/E 26.4× · PEG 0.65 65% evidence 9.0/20 RS sector -0.6% · RS bench -10.6% · 1Y 7.5%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.8 + 12.9 + 13.5 + 9 = 50.2 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
11McDonald's CorporationMCD 48.5/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence ASLEEP 17.0/35 Revenue 6.3% · PAT 4.7% · OPM change -1.2 pp 95% evidence 21.2/25 ROCE 22.7% · OPM 46.5% 76% evidence 5.8/20 P/E 21.9× · PEG 3.99 65% evidence 4.5/20 RS sector -12.7% · RS bench -21.6% · 1Y -17.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17 + 21.2 + 5.8 + 4.5 = 48.5 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
12Nathan's Famous, Inc.NATH 47.5/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence BASING 10.0/35 Revenue 8.7% · PAT -12% · OPM change -7.6 pp 83% evidence 17.5/25 ROCE 14.7% · OPM 15% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 20.8× · PEG 2.06 65% evidence 10.9/20 RS sector 2.5% · RS bench -7.9% · 1Y -4.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10 + 17.5 + 9.1 + 10.9 = 47.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Super Hi International Holding Ltd.HDL 47.3/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 18.8/35 Revenue 10.1% · PAT -26.3% · OPM change 2.9 pp 83% evidence 8.3/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 6.5% 76% evidence 14.1/20 P/E 24.3× · PEG 0.41 65% evidence 6.1/20 RS sector -8% · RS bench -19.3% · 1Y -39.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.8 + 8.3 + 14.1 + 6.1 = 47.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
14Wingstop Inc.WING 45.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 20.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5 pp 45% evidence 16.1/25 ROCE 8.9% · OPM 27.4% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 39.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 0.5/20 RS sector -46.6% · RS bench -52.4% · 1Y -60.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.1 + 16.1 + 9.1 + 0.5 = 45.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
15Starbucks CorporationSBUX 45.3/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence ASLEEP 16.0/35 Revenue 4.5% · PAT -24.8% · OPM change 0.6 pp 95% evidence 13.0/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 10.5% 76% evidence 4.3/20 P/E 60.1× · PEG 5.08 65% evidence 12.0/20 RS sector 6.1% · RS bench -4.5% · 1Y 15.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16 + 13 + 4.3 + 12 = 45.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16Bloomin' Brands, Inc.BLMN 45.2/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence FADING 11.2/35 Revenue 0.9% · PAT -193.9% · OPM change 0.1 pp 83% evidence 8.7/25 ROCE 2.4% · OPM 5.6% 76% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 21.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.2/20 RS sector 12.5% · RS bench 1.3% · 1Y 17.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.2 + 8.7 + 10.1 + 15.2 = 45.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 1.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
17Biglari Holdings Inc.BH 45.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence LEADER 20.4/35 Revenue 8.4% · PAT — · OPM change 4.9 pp 62% evidence 4.0/25 ROCE -0.5% · OPM -4.2% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 138.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.0/20 RS sector 5.8% · RS bench -5.1% · 1Y 13.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.4 + 4 + 8.7 + 12 = 45.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.CMG 42.6/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence FADING 12.2/35 Revenue 7.3% · PAT -7.9% · OPM change -2.5 pp 95% evidence 14.7/25 ROCE 6.7% · OPM 15.7% 76% evidence 4.7/20 P/E 31.2× · PEG 6.18 65% evidence 11.0/20 RS sector -0.9% · RS bench -11.1% · 1Y -14.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.2 + 14.7 + 4.7 + 11 = 42.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
19The Wendy's CompanyWEN 40.9/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence FADING 10.6/35 Revenue -1.8% · PAT -11.8% · OPM change -3.3 pp 83% evidence 12.4/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 19.2% 76% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 8.7× · PEG 1.69 65% evidence 6.6/20 RS sector -7.5% · RS bench -17% · 1Y -24.7%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.6 + 12.4 + 11.3 + 6.6 = 40.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
20Cannae Holdings, Inc.CNNE 39.6/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence BREAKING OUT 9.4/35 Revenue -6.5% · PAT — · OPM change -2.3 pp 62% evidence 3.4/25 ROCE -1.5% · OPM -23% 76% evidence 11.4/20 P/E 8.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.4/20 RS sector 6.3% · RS bench -4.5% · 1Y -20.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 9.4 + 3.4 + 11.4 + 15.4 = 39.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is -4.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
21Dutch Bros Inc.BROS 38.6/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 20.6/35 Revenue 28.4% · PAT 63.9% · OPM change -1.3 pp 83% evidence 7.2/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 7.4% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 79.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.9/20 RS sector -23.4% · RS bench -31.2% · 1Y -29.4%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.6 + 7.2 + 8.9 + 1.9 = 38.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
22Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.CBRL 38.5/100Mixed-negative evidence79% evidence ASLEEP 7.6/35 Revenue -4.9% · PAT -55.2% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence 7.2/25 ROCE 0.4% · OPM 0.8% 76% evidence 7.7/20 P/E 26.8× · PEG 2.29 65% evidence 16.0/20 RS sector 20.6% · RS bench 8.4% · 1Y -0.6%10 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 7.6 + 7.2 + 7.7 + 16 = 38.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 8.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
23CAVA Group, Inc.CAVA 36.1/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 19.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.1 pp 39% evidence 7.2/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 5.8% 76% evidence 8.6/20 P/E 182.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.3/20 RS sector -25.3% · RS bench -32.8% · 1Y -21.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19 + 7.2 + 8.6 + 1.3 = 36.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
24First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.FWRG 35.5/100Mixed-negative evidence68% evidence ASLEEP 19.0/35 Revenue 20.4% · PAT 54.5% · OPM change -0.1 pp 62% evidence 6.3/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM 0.3% 76% evidence 5.3/20 P/E 36.8× · PEG 3.06 65% evidence 4.9/20 RS sector -22.4% · RS bench -30.5% · 1Y -34.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19 + 6.3 + 5.3 + 4.9 = 35.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
25Kura Sushi USA, Inc.this pageKRUS 32.6/100Adverse evidence67% evidence ASLEEP 18.2/35 Revenue 18.2% · PAT — · OPM change 0.2 pp 71% evidence 4.6/25 ROCE 0% · OPM 0% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 678.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.3/20 RS sector -34.3% · RS bench -41.2% · 1Y -51.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.2 + 4.6 + 8.5 + 1.3 = 32.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
26Papa John's International, Inc.PZZA 31.0/100Adverse evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 9.9/35 Revenue -2.4% · PAT -62% · OPM change -0.3 pp 83% evidence 11.2/25 ROCE 3.6% · OPM 4.3% 76% evidence 6.6/20 P/E 38.3× · PEG 2.49 65% evidence 3.3/20 RS sector -41% · RS bench -47.2% · 1Y -57.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9.9 + 11.2 + 6.6 + 3.3 = 31 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
27Shake Shack Inc.SHAK 30.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 10.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -7 pp 45% evidence 4.6/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -0.7% 76% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 93.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.1/20 RS sector -26.9% · RS bench -34.6% · 1Y -43.1%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 10.9 + 4.6 + 8.8 + 6.1 = 30.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
28Sweetgreen, Inc.SG 30.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 9.1/35 Revenue -1.5% · PAT — · OPM change -4.1 pp 62% evidence 3.1/25 ROCE -4.5% · OPM -21.3% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 39.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.6/20 RS sector -0.9% · RS bench -10.8% · 1Y -22.9%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9.1 + 3.1 + 9.3 + 8.6 = 30.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
29BJ's Restaurants, Inc.BJRI 52.7/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence LEADER 19.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.9 pp 39% evidence 7.1/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 3% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 32.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.4/20 RS sector 38% · RS bench 24.4% · 1Y 100.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.6 + 7.1 + 9.6 + 16.4 = 52.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s stock price today?

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. trades at $35.4, −51.8% over the past year. The company is valued at $0.0 B. The stock sits at the very bottom of its 52-week range ($35–$79), −37.3% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 24 weeks in. — as of 17 September 2026.

What were Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s latest quarterly results?

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. reported revenue of $0.1 B and net profit of $0.0 B for the May 26 quarter. Earnings per share were $0.03. The operating margin was 0.0%, 0.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s revenue?

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. reported revenue of $0.1 B in the May 26 quarter, +28.6% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $0.3 B (+16.7%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 47.0% a year. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s profit?

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. earned $0.0 B of net profit in the May 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.0 B. The operating margin ran 0.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s market cap?

Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s market capitalisation is $0.0 B at a stock price of $35.4. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s P/E ratio?

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. trades at a P/E of 596.5×, at the 30th percentile of its own 1-year range, against a long-run median of 686.4×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 17 September 2026.

Does Kura Sushi USA, Inc. pay a dividend?

No — Kura Sushi USA, Inc. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 17 September 2026.

Is Kura Sushi USA, Inc. overvalued?

On its own history, Kura Sushi USA, Inc. looks cheap: its P/E of 596.5× has been cheaper only 30% of the time in 1 years (long-run median 686.4×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 17 September 2026.

How is Kura Sushi USA, Inc. performing?

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. is in a downtrend, 24 weeks in. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 24 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 17 September 2026.

Is Kura Sushi USA, Inc. in an uptrend?

No — the price is in a downtrend (week 24 of stage 4), trading −37.3% versus its 200-day average and at the very bottom of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 17 September 2026.

Is Kura Sushi USA, Inc. beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Kura Sushi USA, Inc. is currently behind the S&P 500 (24 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-04-02), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 7.1 years the stock moved +45% against the S&P 500's +158% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 17 September 2026.

Will Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Kura Sushi USA, Inc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $35.4, the price is in a downtrend 24 weeks in. Its P/E of 596.5× sits at the 30th percentile of its own 1-year range. — as of 17 September 2026.

Is the market betting against Kura Sushi USA, Inc.?

Yes — short interest is 22.2% of Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s tradable float, about 10.2 days to cover at typical volumes. A crowded short: a large bloc is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 17 September 2026.

Does Kura Sushi USA, Inc. have too much debt?

It is moderate — Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s debt-to-equity is 0.90. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 17 September 2026.

What is Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s capex?

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.1 B. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s cash flow?

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. generated $0.0 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $−0.0 B of free cash flow after $0.1 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.0 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 17 September 2026.

How financially safe is Kura Sushi USA, Inc.?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 2.58 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed. — as of 17 September 2026.

Where is Kura Sushi USA, Inc. in its business cycle?

Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was 0.0%, against a 5-year band of −16.7%–0.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 0.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 17 September 2026.

What could break the Kura Sushi USA, Inc. story?

Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 17 September 2026.

Is Kura Sushi USA, Inc. a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 17 September 2026.

Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-17. Every chart on this page is drawn by deterministic code from the raw series — no forecasts, no price opinions, and nothing here is investment advice.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI