CBRE Group, Inc. · CBRE
$6.8B
$8.6B
$7.3B
$7.8B
$7.5B
$8.2B
$7.4B
$7.7B
$7.9B
$9.0B
$7.9B
$8.4B
$9.0B
$10.4B
$8.9B
$9.8B
$10.3B
$11.6B
$10.5B
—
20-quarter listed-company comparison
Real Estate Services Stocks
Real Estate Services: Cushman & Wakefield Limited owns the largest revenue base; The Real Brokerage Inc. has the fastest current growth.
01 · the industry itself · before any single company
How has Real Estate Services moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 13% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 12% on average over the last four reported quarters.
ASLEEP · 1y −14.1%~Moving with the index6 of 24 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months4 are 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more
RS — · 10/24 >200d (−1) · 6/24 lead (+1) · EPS 13/23↑
Real Estate Services, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Real Estate Services, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Real Estate Services, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 24 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks
Is Real Estate Services outperforming S&P 500?
Real Estate Services has underperformed S&P 500 by 10.5% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 1.8%. 5 of 26 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Rafael Holdings, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +34.8%.
-1.8%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
-10.5%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
5/26Stocks leading S&P 500
12/26Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Real Estate Services has underperformed S&P 500 by 10.5% over 52 weeks and 1.8% over 13 weeks. 5 of 26 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 12 of 26 beat the sector itself. Cushman & Wakefield Limited leads with revenue of $10,540 million, based on 20 of 27 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Companies
27
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$113.9B
CBRE Group, Inc.
Revenue growing
14/19
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
5/26
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 27
03 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 57.8% evidence confidence.
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
The RMR Group Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Jones Lang LaSalle IncorporatedJLL | 64.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 21.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.1 pp 45% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 3.2% 76% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 14.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.8/20 RS sector 17.1% · RS bench 4.1% · 1Y 32.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.3 + 14.8 + 10.9 + 17.8 = 64.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 2The RMR Group Inc.RMR | 60.7/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.0/35 Revenue -20.4% · PAT 0% · OPM change 0.3 pp 83% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 4.8% 76% evidence | 16.2/20 P/E 12.8× · PEG 0.46 65% evidence | 14.2/20 RS sector 11.1% · RS bench -0.5% · 1Y 18.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16 + 14.3 + 16.2 + 14.2 = 60.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is -0.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 3CBRE Group, Inc.CBRE | 56.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.8 pp 45% evidence | 15.4/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 4.9% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 30.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.2/20 RS sector 1.8% · RS bench -10% · 1Y -2.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 15.4 + 10.2 + 11.2 = 56.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Star HoldingsSTHO | 53.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 21.3/35 Revenue 11.5% · PAT — · OPM change 21.4 pp 62% evidence | 7.1/25 ROCE -1.2% · OPM -29.6% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 2.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.8/20 RS sector 10.9% · RS bench -1% · 1Y 26.6%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.3 + 7.1 + 11.5 + 13.8 = 53.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5FirstService CorporationFSV | 53.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 20.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.4 pp 45% evidence | 15.7/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 3.5% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 40.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector -8.7% · RS bench -19.5% · 1Y -28.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20 + 15.7 + 9.7 + 8.2 = 53.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Marcus & Millichap, Inc.MMI | 53.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.3/35 Revenue 9.7% · PAT — · OPM change 8.8 pp 62% evidence | 8.4/25 ROCE -0.8% · OPM -3.4% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 47.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.9/20 RS sector 8.3% · RS bench -3.7% · 1Y 6.4%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.3 + 8.4 + 9.4 + 12.9 = 53 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7CoStar Group, Inc.CSGP | 50.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 22.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 6.2 pp 45% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 0.8% · OPM 0.3% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 149.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.6/20 RS sector -44.2% · RS bench -51.8% · 1Y -68.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.9 + 12.3 + 9.3 + 5.6 = 50.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Newmark Group, Inc.NMRK | 49.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 20.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5.8 pp 45% evidence | 13.3/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 3.2% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 18.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -2.6% · RS bench -13.9% · 1Y -2.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.6 + 13.3 + 10.5 + 5.2 = 49.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9IHS Holding LimitedIHS | 48.9/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.2/35 Revenue 3.7% · PAT — · OPM change -15.5 pp 62% evidence | 15.2/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 26.8% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 15.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.7/20 RS sector 7.5% · RS bench -3.8% · 1Y 23.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.2 + 15.2 + 10.8 + 10.7 = 48.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.TCI | 48.5/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.8/35 Revenue 2.1% · PAT 0% · OPM change -10.6 pp 83% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -15.9% 76% evidence | 15.0/20 P/E 32× · PEG 0.54 65% evidence | 8.9/20 RS sector -0.9% · RS bench -12.5% · 1Y 4.4%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.8 + 9.8 + 15 + 8.9 = 48.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 11Compass, Inc.COMP | 47.7/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.9/35 Revenue 40.1% · PAT — · OPM change -9 pp 62% evidence | 4.2/25 ROCE -8.9% · OPM -13% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 365.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.6/20 RS sector 27% · RS bench 12.7% · 1Y 47.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.9 + 4.2 + 9 + 19.6 = 47.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 12.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 12Colliers International Group Inc.CIGI | 47.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.1 pp 45% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 2.7% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 44.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.3/20 RS sector -21.1% · RS bench -30.9% · 1Y -37%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 14.1 + 9.6 + 6.3 = 47.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Cushman & Wakefield LimitedCWK | 46.6/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | BASING | 18.3/35 Revenue 10.4% · PAT -53.8% · OPM change 0.3 pp 83% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 2.3% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 38.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -2.5% · RS bench -13.9% · 1Y 2.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.3 + 11.8 + 9.9 + 6.6 = 46.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14American Realty Investors, Inc.ARL | 43.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 15.0/35 Revenue 4.2% · PAT — · OPM change -11 pp 62% evidence | 9.1/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -17.8% 76% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 20.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.7/20 RS sector -1.2% · RS bench -12.2% · 1Y 20%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15 + 9.1 + 10.3 + 8.7 = 43.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 15The Real Brokerage Inc.REAX | 42.8/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | BASING | 23.9/35 Revenue 46.8% · PAT — · OPM change 0.8 pp 62% evidence | 5.2/25 ROCE -7% · OPM -0.7% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.7/20 RS sector -42.9% · RS bench -50.6% · 1Y -55.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.9 + 5.2 + 10 + 3.7 = 42.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 16Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.SEG | 41.4/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 12.3/35 Revenue 13.4% · PAT — · OPM change -130.3 pp 62% evidence | 3.8/25 ROCE -7% · OPM -333.8% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 15.3/20 RS sector 15.9% · RS bench 3.3% · 1Y 13%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.3 + 3.8 + 10 + 15.3 = 41.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.RMAX | 38.7/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.2/35 Revenue -5% · PAT -90% · OPM change -18.3 pp 62% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE -1.8% · OPM -11.1% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 576× · PEG 1.66 65% evidence | 13.3/20 RS sector 17% · RS bench 4.2% · 1Y 20.5%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.2 + 7.5 + 8.7 + 13.3 = 38.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 4.2%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 18FRP Holdings, Inc.FRPH | 38.0/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence | TURNING | 11.7/35 Revenue 4.8% · PAT -85.7% · OPM change -17.8 pp 83% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM 4.8% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 547× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.7/20 RS sector -3.7% · RS bench -14.5% · 1Y -13.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.7 + 10.9 + 8.7 + 6.7 = 38 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19AGNT, IncAGNT | 37.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.6/35 Revenue 5.3% · PAT — · OPM change 0.2 pp 62% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE -3.8% · OPM -0.9% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 406× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -46.1% · RS bench -53.2% · 1Y -57.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 7.5 + 8.8 + 3 = 37.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 20Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.MLP | 37.4/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence | TURNING | 11.4/35 Revenue 20% · PAT -500% · OPM change -28.5 pp 83% evidence | 4.9/25 ROCE -5.5% · OPM -59.2% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 239.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.0/20 RS sector 6.6% · RS bench -5.2% · 1Y 4.9%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.4 + 4.9 + 9.1 + 12 = 37.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21Douglas Elliman Inc.DOUG | 32.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.7/35 Revenue -5.3% · PAT — · OPM change -6.1 pp 62% evidence | 6.3/25 ROCE -4.8% · OPM -8.2% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 13.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -20.5% · RS bench -30.3% · 1Y -21.4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.7 + 6.3 + 11.1 + 5.2 = 32.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Seritage Growth PropertiesSRG | 31.0/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.2/35 Revenue 0% · PAT — · OPM change -635.5 pp 62% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE -4.2% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -22.5% · RS bench -32% · 1Y -15%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.2 + 7.3 + 10 + 4.5 = 31 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 23Opendoor Technologies Inc.OPEN | 23.0/100Adverse evidence61% evidence | ASLEEP | 7.9/35 Revenue -23.2% · PAT — · OPM change -17.2 pp 62% evidence | 4.0/25 ROCE -7.5% · OPM -22.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 1.1/20 RS sector -27.1% · RS bench -36.1% · 1Y 111.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.9 + 4 + 10 + 1.1 = 23 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.CHCI | 64.1/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | BASING | 23.0/35 Revenue 24.1% · PAT 13.3% · OPM change — 45% evidence | 13.6/25 ROCE — · OPM — 15% evidence | 15.9/20 P/E 11.4× · PEG 0.83 65% evidence | 11.6/20 RS sector 5.6% · RS bench -5.7% · 1Y 11.9%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23 + 13.6 + 15.9 + 11.6 = 64.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 25Rafael Holdings, Inc.RFL | 54.8/100Thin evidence · provisional24% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 8% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE — · OPM — 15% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 18.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 34.8% · RS bench 20.9% · 1Y 23.5%9 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.3 + 10.9 + 10.6 + 17 = 54.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26New England Realty Associates Limited PartnershipNEN | 43.7/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence | BASING | 11.8/35 Revenue 14.8% · PAT -112.5% · OPM change -23.9 pp 83% evidence | 11.9/25 ROCE 0.4% · OPM 6.2% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y -20.2%0 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.8 + 11.9 + 10 + 10 = 43.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.HBNB | 43.1/100Thin evidence · provisional29% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE -1.7% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.9/20 RS sector -7.9% · RS bench -17.5% · 1Y 213.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.3 + 8.9 + 10 + 5.9 = 43.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Showing 10 of 27 companies
04 · what price has already done
Market action
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. has the strongest one-year price move in Real Estate Services at +213.7%. Rafael Holdings, Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +20.9%. 5 of 26 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.
Price and relative strength
Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Real Estate Services itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
05 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Cushman & Wakefield Limited has the highest Revenue among the 27 Real Estate Services companies compared here, at $10,540 million. Compass, Inc. is next at $8,310 million. The Real Brokerage Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at 46.8%, so level and change sit with different companies. 20 of 27 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Cushman & Wakefield Limited is the scale leader at $10,540 million, 26.8% ahead of Compass, Inc.. The Real Brokerage Inc.'s growth is 46.8% from a $2,081 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderCushman & Wakefield Limited · $10,540 million
Gap26.8% versus #2 · Compass, Inc.
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage20/27 companies · 491 observations
Investor read: Cushman & Wakefield Limited is the scale benchmark; The Real Brokerage Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Cushman & Wakefield Limited's growth falls below The Real Brokerage Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
Revenue growthfastest growers
Revenue · company comparison
20/27 level · 19/27 change
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Colliers International Group Inc. · CIGI
$1.0B
$1.3B
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$966M
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.5B
$1.1B
$1.3B
$1.5B
$1.6B
$1.3B
—
Compass, Inc. · COMP
$1.7B
$1.6B
$1.4B
$2.0B
$1.5B
$1.1B
$957M
$1.5B
$1.3B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.7B
$1.5B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$2.1B
$1.8B
$1.7B
$2.7B
—
CoStar Group, Inc. · CSGP
$499M
$507M
$516M
$536M
$557M
$573M
$584M
$606M
$625M
$640M
$656M
$678M
$693M
$709M
$732M
$781M
$834M
$900M
$897M
—
Cushman & Wakefield Limited · CWK
$2.3B
$2.9B
$2.3B
$2.6B
$2.5B
$2.6B
$2.2B
$2.4B
$2.3B
$2.6B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$2.3B
$2.6B
$2.3B
$2.5B
$2.6B
$2.9B
$2.5B
—
FirstService Corporation · FSV
$849M
$857M
$835M
$931M
$960M
$1.0B
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.3B
—
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. · HBNB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$0M
—
$0M
—
$6M
—
$17M
—
$59M
—
—
IHS Holding Limited · IHS
$401M
$416M
$446M
$468M
$521M
$526M
$603M
$546M
$467M
$510M
$418M
$435M
$420M
$393M
$392M
$433M
$455M
$398M
$415M
—
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated · JLL
$4.9B
$5.9B
$4.8B
$5.3B
$5.2B
$5.6B
$4.7B
$5.1B
$5.1B
$5.9B
$5.1B
$5.6B
$5.9B
$6.8B
$5.7B
$6.3B
$6.5B
$7.6B
$6.4B
—
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. · MMI
$332M
$495M
$319M
$396M
$324M
$262M
$155M
$163M
$162M
$166M
$129M
$158M
$169M
$240M
$145M
$172M
$194M
$244M
$171M
—
Newmark Group, Inc. · NMRK
$788M
$984M
$678M
$755M
$665M
$607M
$521M
$586M
$616M
$747M
$546M
$633M
$686M
$873M
$665M
$759M
$863M
$1.0B
$847M
—
Opendoor Technologies Inc. · OPEN
$2.3B
$3.8B
$5.2B
$4.2B
$3.4B
$2.9B
$3.1B
$2.0B
$980M
$870M
$1.2B
$1.5B
$1.4B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.6B
$915M
$736M
$720M
—
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
CBRE Group, Inc. · CBRE
—
—
—
20%
11%
-4.2%
1.1%
-0.7%
4.5%
9.2%
7.1%
8.7%
15%
16%
12%
16%
14%
12%
19%
—
Colliers International Group Inc. · CIGI
—
—
—
19%
8.3%
-9.1%
-3.5%
-4.4%
-4.7%
1.1%
3.7%
5.7%
12%
22%
14%
18%
24%
7.0%
15%
—
Compass, Inc. · COMP
—
—
—
3.5%
-14%
-31%
-32%
-26%
-11%
-1.0%
10%
14%
12%
26%
29%
21%
24%
23%
99%
—
CoStar Group, Inc. · CSGP
—
—
—
12%
12%
13%
13%
13%
12%
12%
12%
12%
11%
11%
12%
15%
20%
27%
23%
—
Cushman & Wakefield Limited · CWK
—
—
—
16%
7.8%
-8.2%
-3.5%
-7.9%
-9.1%
-3.6%
-2.9%
-4.9%
2.5%
3.1%
4.6%
8.6%
11%
11%
11%
—
FirstService Corporation · FSV
—
—
—
12%
13%
19%
22%
20%
16%
5.8%
14%
16%
25%
27%
8.0%
9.2%
3.7%
1.3%
5.3%
—
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. · HBNB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
883%
—
—
IHS Holding Limited · IHS
—
—
—
16%
30%
26%
35%
17%
-10%
-3.0%
-31%
-20%
-10%
-23%
-6.2%
-0.5%
8.3%
1.3%
5.9%
—
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated · JLL
—
—
—
17%
5.9%
-5.7%
-1.8%
-4.3%
-1.3%
4.9%
8.7%
11%
15%
16%
12%
11%
11%
12%
11%
—
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. · MMI
—
—
—
39%
-2.4%
-47%
-51%
-59%
-50%
-37%
-17%
-3.1%
4.3%
45%
12%
8.9%
15%
1.7%
18%
—
Newmark Group, Inc. · NMRK
—
—
—
20%
-16%
-38%
-23%
-22%
-7.4%
23%
4.8%
8.0%
11%
17%
22%
20%
26%
15%
27%
—
Opendoor Technologies Inc. · OPEN
—
—
—
254%
48%
-25%
-39%
-53%
-71%
-70%
-62%
-24%
41%
25%
-2.4%
3.7%
-34%
-32%
-38%
—
06 · compare level, then change
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
IHS Holding Limited has the highest OPM among the 27 Real Estate Services companies compared here, at 26.8%. New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership is next at 6.2%. Star Holdings has the highest Margin change at +21.4 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 23 of 27 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: IHS Holding Limited leads opm at 26.8%; Star Holdings leads margin change at +21.4 percentage points.
LeaderIHS Holding Limited · 26.8%
Gap332.3% versus #2 · New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage23/27 companies · 443 observations
Investor read: IHS Holding Limited sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
Margin changefastest expanders
Operating margin · company comparison
23/27 level · 24/27 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| IHS Holding Limited IHS | 27% | −15.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership NEN | 6.2% | −23.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| CBRE Group, Inc. CBRE | 4.9% | +1.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
| The RMR Group Inc. RMR | 4.8% | +0.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| FRP Holdings, Inc. FRPH | 4.8% | −17.8 pp | Mar 2026 |
| FirstService Corporation FSV | 3.5% | +0.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated JLL | 3.2% | +1.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Newmark Group, Inc. NMRK | 3.2% | +5.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Colliers International Group Inc. CIGI | 2.7% | −0.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Cushman & Wakefield Limited CWK | 2.3% | +0.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| CoStar Group, Inc. CSGP | 0.3% | +6.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| The Real Brokerage Inc. REAX | -0.7% | +0.8 pp | Mar 2026 |
| AGNT, Inc AGNT | -0.9% | +0.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Marcus & Millichap, Inc. MMI | -3.4% | +8.8 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Douglas Elliman Inc. DOUG | -8.2% | −6.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. RMAX | -11% | −18.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Compass, Inc. COMP | -13% | −9.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. TCI | -16% | −10.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| American Realty Investors, Inc. ARL | -18% | −11.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Opendoor Technologies Inc. OPEN | -22% | −17.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Star Holdings STHO | -30% | +21.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. MLP | -59% | −28.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Seritage Growth Properties SRG | -141% | −635.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. SEG | -334% | −130.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 24 companies with a series here. The remaining 12 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
AGNT, Inc · AGNT
1.0%
0.1%
0.4%
0.8%
0.0%
-1.2%
0.0%
1.0%
0.3%
-1.6%
-1.9%
1.4%
-0.7%
-1.0%
-1.1%
-0.2%
0.3%
-1.1%
-0.9%
—
CBRE Group, Inc. · CBRE
6.0%
6.9%
5.1%
6.7%
5.0%
3.0%
0.5%
4.0%
3.4%
5.6%
2.6%
2.9%
4.1%
5.7%
3.1%
3.8%
4.7%
5.3%
4.9%
—
Colliers International Group Inc. · CIGI
7.4%
10%
4.1%
9.2%
7.6%
8.5%
2.3%
7.0%
6.7%
11%
4.3%
10%
9.3%
8.1%
2.8%
7.4%
7.2%
8.4%
2.7%
—
Compass, Inc. · COMP
-5.8%
-11%
-13%
-4.9%
-10%
-14%
-16%
-3.0%
-2.9%
-7.6%
-13%
1.3%
-0.2%
-2.9%
-4.0%
1.9%
-0.4%
-2.5%
-13%
—
CoStar Group, Inc. · CSGP
18%
28%
25%
21%
15%
22%
12%
13%
9.9%
11%
-6.5%
-2.4%
3.4%
5.6%
-5.9%
-3.5%
-6.1%
5.5%
0.3%
—
Cushman & Wakefield Limited · CWK
5.6%
8.6%
5.8%
6.8%
4.5%
1.6%
-0.8%
2.3%
2.5%
6.6%
0.9%
3.1%
3.2%
7.3%
2.0%
4.9%
4.1%
6.1%
2.3%
—
FirstService Corporation · FSV
7.2%
5.2%
3.5%
6.4%
6.5%
6.6%
4.0%
7.4%
6.6%
4.5%
3.3%
6.5%
9.0%
6.6%
3.1%
6.9%
8.0%
6.2%
3.5%
—
IHS Holding Limited · IHS
14%
19%
24%
21%
26%
-5.1%
32%
27%
2.9%
34%
-1.7%
34%
30%
61%
42%
34%
35%
81%
27%
—
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated · JLL
6.0%
7.5%
3.7%
4.5%
3.9%
4.5%
0.4%
3.0%
2.3%
4.9%
2.2%
2.7%
3.9%
5.5%
2.1%
3.2%
4.2%
6.7%
3.2%
—
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. · MMI
14%
17%
14%
14%
9.4%
2.2%
-10%
-6.6%
-9.5%
-10%
-16%
-5.1%
-6.8%
2.8%
-12%
-5.3%
-1.2%
6.3%
-3.4%
—
Newmark Group, Inc. · NMRK
29%
23%
1.9%
12%
8.8%
4.2%
-2.3%
4.7%
4.9%
11%
-4.1%
6.4%
6.0%
12%
-2.6%
5.6%
9.9%
12%
3.2%
—
Opendoor Technologies Inc. · OPEN
-3.0%
-2.7%
2.3%
0.8%
-24%
-9.5%
-4.0%
-3.4%
-8.1%
-13%
-7.4%
-4.8%
-4.9%
-8.7%
-4.9%
-0.8%
-7.4%
-20%
-22%
—
Margin change · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 24 companies with a series here. The remaining 12 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
AGNT, Inc · AGNT
—
—
—
−0.9 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.3 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.4 pp
−1.9 pp
+0.4 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.8 pp
−1.6 pp
+1.0 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.2 pp
—
CBRE Group, Inc. · CBRE
—
—
—
+1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−3.9 pp
−4.6 pp
−2.7 pp
−1.6 pp
+2.6 pp
+2.1 pp
−1.1 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.4 pp
+1.8 pp
—
Colliers International Group Inc. · CIGI
—
—
—
+50.0 pp
+0.2 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.8 pp
−2.2 pp
−0.9 pp
+2.2 pp
+2.0 pp
+3.1 pp
+2.6 pp
−2.6 pp
−1.5 pp
−2.7 pp
−2.1 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
—
Compass, Inc. · COMP
—
—
—
−4.5 pp
−4.4 pp
−3.1 pp
−2.2 pp
+1.9 pp
+7.3 pp
+6.2 pp
+3.0 pp
+4.3 pp
+2.7 pp
+4.7 pp
+8.5 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.4 pp
−9.0 pp
—
CoStar Group, Inc. · CSGP
—
—
—
−0.5 pp
−2.7 pp
−5.5 pp
−12.5 pp
−7.4 pp
−5.4 pp
−11.4 pp
−18.9 pp
−15.5 pp
−6.5 pp
−5.2 pp
+0.6 pp
−1.1 pp
−9.5 pp
−0.1 pp
+6.2 pp
—
Cushman & Wakefield Limited · CWK
—
—
—
+1.3 pp
−1.1 pp
−7.0 pp
−6.6 pp
−4.5 pp
−2.0 pp
+5.0 pp
+1.7 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.8 pp
+0.9 pp
−1.2 pp
+0.3 pp
—
FirstService Corporation · FSV
—
—
—
−1.0 pp
−0.7 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.5 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.1 pp
−2.1 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.9 pp
+2.4 pp
+2.1 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.4 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
—
IHS Holding Limited · IHS
—
—
—
−15.7 pp
+11.8 pp
−24.0 pp
+8.1 pp
+6.4 pp
−22.8 pp
+39.3 pp
−34.1 pp
+7.0 pp
+27.0 pp
+26.4 pp
+44.0 pp
−0.2 pp
+5.2 pp
+20.8 pp
−15.5 pp
—
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated · JLL
—
—
—
−0.5 pp
−2.1 pp
−3.0 pp
−3.3 pp
−1.5 pp
−1.6 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.8 pp
−0.3 pp
+1.6 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.3 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.1 pp
—
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. · MMI
—
—
—
−0.3 pp
−4.3 pp
−14.3 pp
−24.3 pp
−20.9 pp
−18.9 pp
−12.5 pp
−5.2 pp
+1.5 pp
+2.7 pp
+13.1 pp
+3.4 pp
−0.2 pp
+5.6 pp
+3.5 pp
+8.8 pp
—
Newmark Group, Inc. · NMRK
—
—
—
−105.1 pp
−19.8 pp
−19.1 pp
−4.2 pp
−7.1 pp
−3.9 pp
+6.4 pp
−1.8 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.3 pp
+1.5 pp
−0.8 pp
+3.9 pp
+0.4 pp
+5.8 pp
—
Opendoor Technologies Inc. · OPEN
—
—
—
+13.6 pp
−21.1 pp
−6.8 pp
−6.3 pp
−4.2 pp
+16.0 pp
−3.7 pp
−3.4 pp
−1.4 pp
+3.2 pp
+4.5 pp
+2.5 pp
+4.0 pp
−2.5 pp
−11.7 pp
−17.2 pp
—
07 · compare level, then change
Profit Scale & Acceleration
IHS Holding Limited has the highest Net profit among the 27 Real Estate Services companies compared here, at $162 million. Cushman & Wakefield Limited is next at $73 million. Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. has the highest Profit growth at 13.3%, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Net profit series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: IHS Holding Limited leads with $162 million of TTM profit, 121.9% above Cushman & Wakefield Limited. Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. shows 13.3% growth from a $17 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderIHS Holding Limited · $162 million
Gap121.9% versus #2 · Cushman & Wakefield Limited
Persistence1/5 recent comparable periods
Coverage20/27 companies · 493 observations
Investor read: IHS Holding Limited sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
Profit growthfastest growers
Net profit · company comparison
20/27 level · 7/27 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
CBRE Group, Inc. · CBRE
$437M
$693M
$396M
$490M
$452M
$86M
$125M
$206M
$201M
$495M
$148M
$142M
$245M
$501M
$191M
$239M
$396M
$450M
$342M
—
Colliers International Group Inc. · CIGI
$50M
$100M
$21M
$67M
$45M
$62M
$-1M
$35M
$29M
$81M
$14M
$72M
$69M
$81M
$9M
$64M
$65M
$87M
$11M
—
Compass, Inc. · COMP
$-100M
$-175M
$-188M
$-101M
$-154M
$-158M
$-150M
$-47M
$-39M
$-83M
$-133M
$21M
$-2M
$-40M
$-51M
$39M
$-5M
$-40M
$22M
—
CoStar Group, Inc. · CSGP
$64M
$93M
$89M
$83M
$72M
$124M
$87M
$101M
$91M
$97M
$7M
$19M
$53M
$60M
$-15M
$6M
$-31M
$47M
$3M
—
Cushman & Wakefield Limited · CWK
$69M
$146M
$46M
$97M
$24M
$-2M
$-76M
$5M
$-34M
$94M
$-29M
$14M
$34M
$108M
$2M
$57M
$51M
$-22M
$-13M
—
FirstService Corporation · FSV
$53M
$35M
$19M
$41M
$41M
$44M
$23M
$55M
$46M
$24M
$15M
$45M
$78M
$50M
$14M
$55M
$71M
$50M
$24M
—
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. · HBNB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$-1M
—
$-2M
—
$-2M
—
$-5M
—
$-12M
—
$-7M
—
—
IHS Holding Limited · IHS
$-30M
$-72M
$15M
$-179M
$-37M
$-269M
$8M
$-1.3B
$-269M
$-457M
$-1.6B
$-124M
$-206M
$243M
$47M
$32M
$147M
$-84M
$67M
—
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated · JLL
$237M
$421M
$144M
$336M
$138M
$176M
$-9M
$3M
$59M
$172M
$66M
$85M
$155M
$242M
$58M
$111M
$222M
$402M
$159M
—
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. · MMI
$34M
$62M
$33M
$42M
$21M
$8M
$-6M
$-9M
$-9M
$-10M
$-10M
$-6M
$-5M
$9M
$-4M
$-11M
$0M
$13M
$-3M
—
Newmark Group, Inc. · NMRK
$163M
$185M
$1M
$62M
$38M
$12M
$-16M
$11M
$14M
$53M
$-26M
$23M
$24M
$64M
$-16M
$30M
$58M
$83M
$17M
—
Opendoor Technologies Inc. · OPEN
$-57M
$-191M
$28M
$-54M
$-928M
$-399M
$-101M
$23M
$-106M
$-91M
$-109M
$-92M
$-78M
$-113M
$-85M
$-29M
$-90M
$-1.1B
$-173M
—
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 24 companies with a series here. The remaining 12 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
AGNT, Inc · AGNT
—
—
—
-76%
-83%
-147%
-67%
133%
0.0%
—
-1,067%
14%
-475%
—
—
-121%
—
—
—
—
CBRE Group, Inc. · CBRE
—
—
—
11%
3.4%
-88%
-68%
-58%
-56%
476%
18%
-31%
22%
1.2%
29%
68%
62%
-10%
79%
—
Colliers International Group Inc. · CIGI
—
—
—
—
-10%
-38%
-105%
-48%
-36%
31%
—
106%
138%
0.0%
-36%
-11%
-5.8%
7.4%
22%
—
Compass, Inc. · COMP
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
86%
—
—
—
—
CoStar Group, Inc. · CSGP
—
—
—
36%
13%
33%
-2.3%
22%
26%
-22%
-92%
-81%
-42%
-38%
-314%
-68%
-158%
-22%
—
—
Cushman & Wakefield Limited · CWK
—
—
—
83%
-65%
-101%
-265%
-95%
-242%
—
—
180%
—
15%
—
307%
50%
-120%
-750%
—
FirstService Corporation · FSV
—
—
—
-6.8%
-23%
26%
21%
34%
12%
-45%
-35%
-18%
70%
108%
-6.7%
22%
-9.0%
0.0%
71%
—
IHS Holding Limited · IHS
—
—
—
-269%
—
—
-47%
—
—
—
-19,563%
—
—
—
—
—
—
-135%
43%
—
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated · JLL
—
—
—
69%
-42%
-58%
-106%
-99%
-57%
-2.3%
—
2,733%
163%
41%
-12%
31%
43%
66%
174%
—
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. · MMI
—
—
—
31%
-38%
-87%
-118%
-121%
-143%
-225%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
44%
—
—
Newmark Group, Inc. · NMRK
—
—
—
-89%
-77%
-94%
-1,700%
-82%
-63%
342%
—
109%
71%
21%
—
30%
142%
30%
—
—
Opendoor Technologies Inc. · OPEN
—
—
—
—
—
—
-461%
—
—
—
—
-500%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
08 · compare level, then change
Return On Capital Employed
IHS Holding Limited has the highest ROCE among the 27 Real Estate Services companies compared here, at 3.2%. FirstService Corporation is next at 2.9%. Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. has the highest ROCE change at +44.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 25 of 27 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: IHS Holding Limited leads ROCE at 3.2%, 0.3 percentage points above FirstService Corporation. Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. has the strongest latest improvement at +44.5 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderIHS Holding Limited · 3.2%
Gap10.3% versus #2 · FirstService Corporation
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage25/27 companies · 462 observations
Investor read: IHS Holding Limited sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
ROCE changefastest improvers
Return on capital · company comparison
25/27 level · 25/27 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| IHS Holding Limited IHS | 3.2% | −1.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| FirstService Corporation FSV | 2.9% | 0.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated JLL | 2.8% | +0.9 pp | Jun 2026 |
| CBRE Group, Inc. CBRE | 2.0% | −0.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Colliers International Group Inc. CIGI | 1.8% | −0.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Newmark Group, Inc. NMRK | 1.3% | −0.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| The RMR Group Inc. RMR | 1.2% | −0.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Cushman & Wakefield Limited CWK | 1.1% | +0.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| CoStar Group, Inc. CSGP | 0.8% | +1.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership NEN | 0.4% | −1.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| FRP Holdings, Inc. FRPH | 0.1% | −0.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. TCI | -0.2% | −0.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| American Realty Investors, Inc. ARL | -0.2% | −0.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Marcus & Millichap, Inc. MMI | -0.8% | +1.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Star Holdings STHO | -1.2% | +0.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. HBNB | -1.7% | +44.5 pp | Dec 2025 |
| RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. RMAX | -1.8% | −3.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| AGNT, Inc AGNT | -3.8% | +1.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Seritage Growth Properties SRG | -4.2% | −1.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Douglas Elliman Inc. DOUG | -4.8% | −3.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. MLP | -5.5% | −0.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| The Real Brokerage Inc. REAX | -7.0% | +10.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. SEG | -7.0% | −1.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Opendoor Technologies Inc. OPEN | -7.5% | −5.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Compass, Inc. COMP | -8.9% | −3.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 25 companies with a series here. The remaining 13 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
CBRE Group, Inc. · CBRE
3.6%
4.8%
3.0%
4.2%
3.0%
1.9%
0.3%
2.3%
2.0%
3.8%
1.5%
1.7%
2.5%
4.0%
1.8%
2.3%
2.9%
3.7%
3.0%
2.0%
Colliers International Group Inc. · CIGI
3.5%
6.1%
1.7%
4.1%
3.2%
3.4%
0.7%
2.2%
2.0%
3.4%
1.1%
2.8%
2.5%
2.8%
0.7%
2.2%
2.1%
2.8%
0.7%
1.8%
Compass, Inc. · COMP
-7.7%
-14%
-16%
-7.0%
-11%
-13%
-13%
-4.1%
-3.8%
-8.8%
-15%
2.4%
-0.4%
-4.8%
-5.9%
4.0%
-0.7%
-4.2%
-8.9%
—
CoStar Group, Inc. · CSGP
1.3%
2.1%
1.9%
1.6%
1.2%
1.7%
1.0%
1.0%
0.8%
0.8%
-0.5%
-0.2%
0.3%
0.5%
-0.5%
-0.3%
-0.5%
0.5%
0.0%
0.8%
Cushman & Wakefield Limited · CWK
2.5%
4.6%
2.6%
3.3%
2.1%
2.0%
-0.3%
1.0%
1.1%
2.0%
0.3%
1.3%
1.4%
3.3%
0.9%
2.4%
2.1%
3.4%
1.1%
—
FirstService Corporation · FSV
3.6%
2.5%
1.6%
3.3%
3.3%
3.3%
1.9%
3.9%
3.4%
1.9%
1.5%
3.0%
4.5%
2.9%
1.2%
2.9%
3.4%
2.5%
1.4%
2.9%
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. · HBNB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-15%
-15%
-63%
-63%
-46%
-46%
8.8%
8.8%
-1.7%
-1.7%
—
—
IHS Holding Limited · IHS
1.5%
1.9%
2.5%
2.2%
3.1%
-0.5%
3.8%
3.1%
0.3%
3.8%
-0.2%
3.5%
3.1%
6.2%
4.4%
3.8%
4.1%
9.4%
3.2%
—
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated · JLL
3.5%
5.2%
1.9%
2.5%
2.2%
2.7%
0.2%
1.5%
1.2%
3.0%
1.1%
1.5%
2.3%
3.9%
1.2%
1.9%
2.7%
5.1%
2.0%
2.8%
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. · MMI
6.7%
11%
6.1%
7.4%
3.8%
0.7%
-2.0%
-1.3%
-1.9%
-2.1%
-2.6%
-1.1%
-1.5%
0.9%
-2.4%
-1.3%
-0.3%
2.1%
-0.8%
—
Newmark Group, Inc. · NMRK
8.3%
8.6%
0.5%
3.0%
2.0%
0.9%
-0.4%
1.0%
1.1%
3.0%
-0.8%
1.4%
1.4%
3.5%
-0.6%
1.4%
2.8%
4.1%
0.9%
1.3%
Opendoor Technologies Inc. · OPEN
-2.5%
-3.0%
2.9%
0.7%
-15%
-5.3%
-2.4%
-1.3%
-1.6%
-2.7%
-2.2%
-2.0%
-2.0%
-3.1%
-2.0%
-0.5%
-3.0%
-6.4%
-7.5%
—
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 25 companies with a series here. The remaining 13 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
CBRE Group, Inc. · CBRE
—
—
—
—
−0.6 pp
−2.9 pp
−2.7 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.0 pp
+1.9 pp
+1.2 pp
−0.6 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.3 pp
+1.2 pp
−0.3 pp
Colliers International Group Inc. · CIGI
—
—
—
—
−0.3 pp
−2.7 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.2 pp
0.0 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.4 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−0.4 pp
Compass, Inc. · COMP
—
—
—
—
−3.7 pp
+1.3 pp
+2.5 pp
+2.9 pp
+7.6 pp
+4.0 pp
−2.2 pp
+6.5 pp
+3.4 pp
+4.0 pp
+9.4 pp
+1.6 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.6 pp
−3.0 pp
—
CoStar Group, Inc. · CSGP
—
—
—
—
−0.1 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.9 pp
−1.5 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.3 pp
0.0 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.8 pp
0.0 pp
+0.5 pp
+1.1 pp
Cushman & Wakefield Limited · CWK
—
—
—
—
−0.4 pp
−2.6 pp
−2.9 pp
−2.3 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.3 pp
+1.3 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.2 pp
—
FirstService Corporation · FSV
—
—
—
—
−0.3 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.1 pp
−1.4 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.9 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.0 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
−1.1 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
0.0 pp
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. · HBNB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
−31.0 pp
−31.0 pp
+71.5 pp
+71.5 pp
+44.5 pp
+44.5 pp
—
—
IHS Holding Limited · IHS
—
—
—
—
+1.6 pp
−2.4 pp
+1.3 pp
+0.9 pp
−2.8 pp
+4.3 pp
−4.0 pp
+0.4 pp
+2.8 pp
+2.4 pp
+4.6 pp
+0.3 pp
+1.0 pp
+3.2 pp
−1.2 pp
—
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated · JLL
—
—
—
—
−1.3 pp
−2.5 pp
−1.7 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.9 pp
0.0 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.9 pp
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. · MMI
—
—
—
—
−2.9 pp
−10.4 pp
−8.1 pp
−8.7 pp
−5.7 pp
−2.8 pp
−0.6 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.4 pp
+3.0 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.2 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.6 pp
—
Newmark Group, Inc. · NMRK
—
—
—
—
−6.3 pp
−7.7 pp
−0.9 pp
−2.0 pp
−0.9 pp
+2.1 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.2 pp
0.0 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.5 pp
−0.1 pp
Opendoor Technologies Inc. · OPEN
—
—
—
—
−12.3 pp
−2.3 pp
−5.3 pp
−2.0 pp
+13.2 pp
+2.6 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.5 pp
−1.0 pp
−3.3 pp
−5.5 pp
—
09 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
The RMR Group Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 27 Real Estate Services companies compared here, at 0.46×. Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. is next at 0.54×. Star Holdings has the lowest P/E at 2.25×, so level and change sit with different companies. 4 of 27 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: The RMR Group Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.46×, 14.8% below Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.. Only 4 of 27 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderThe RMR Group Inc. · 0.46×
Gap14.8% versus #2 · Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/27 companies · 31 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
P/Elowest P/E
Valuation · company comparison
4/27 level · 21/27 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| FRP Holdings, Inc. FRPH | 12.5 | 547.0 | Mar 2026 |
| CoStar Group, Inc. CSGP | 5.1 | 149.1 | Jun 2026 |
| FirstService Corporation FSV | 1.8 | 40.3 | Jun 2026 |
| RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. RMAX | 1.7 | 576.0 | Mar 2026 |
| Colliers International Group Inc. CIGI | 1.1 | 44.6 | Jun 2026 |
| Newmark Group, Inc. NMRK | 0.9 | 18.7 | Jun 2026 |
| CBRE Group, Inc. CBRE | 0.9 | 30.9 | Jun 2026 |
| Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. CHCI | 0.8 | 11.4 | Mar 2026 |
| Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. TCI | 0.5 | 32.0 | Mar 2026 |
| The RMR Group Inc. RMR | 0.5 | 12.8 | Mar 2026 |
| Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated JLL | 0.5 | 14.9 | Jun 2026 |
| Compass, Inc. COMP | — | 365.5 | Mar 2026 |
| Cushman & Wakefield Limited CWK | — | 38.3 | Mar 2026 |
| IHS Holding Limited IHS | — | 15.5 | Mar 2026 |
| Marcus & Millichap, Inc. MMI | — | 47.7 | Mar 2026 |
| AGNT, Inc AGNT | — | 406.0 | Mar 2026 |
| Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. MLP | — | 239.2 | Mar 2026 |
| American Realty Investors, Inc. ARL | — | 20.3 | Mar 2026 |
| Douglas Elliman Inc. DOUG | — | 13.9 | Mar 2026 |
| Star Holdings STHO | — | 2.3 | Mar 2026 |
| Rafael Holdings, Inc. RFL | — | 18.1 | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
CBRE Group, Inc. · CBRE
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2.3
—
—
—
2.0
1.3
1.8
0.9
—
Colliers International Group Inc. · CIGI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3.2
—
—
—
—
1.1
—
—
—
—
—
Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. · CHCI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.2
—
—
—
—
—
0.5
0.8
—
CoStar Group, Inc. · CSGP
—
—
—
—
—
—
5.0
7.2
5.1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
FirstService Corporation · FSV
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
8.6
3.2
—
—
—
—
1.9
1.3
—
2.4
7.7
1.8
—
FRP Holdings, Inc. · FRPH
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
8.4
—
—
—
12.5
—
—
—
—
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated · JLL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.1
—
—
—
0.5
0.7
0.5
—
—
Newmark Group, Inc. · NMRK
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.7
—
0.9
—
—
—
—
—
—
RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. · RMAX
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.7
—
—
The RMR Group Inc. · RMR
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. · TCI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.5
—
—
—
—
—
P/E · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
AGNT, Inc · AGNT
84.6
66.1
38.5
31.8
44.8
73.9
253.8
338.0
406.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
CBRE Group, Inc. · CBRE
22.7
20.1
15.8
12.4
11.1
17.9
20.9
30.6
39.5
29.6
30.3
29.8
40.0
41.8
40.0
39.3
38.9
41.8
30.9
30.9
Colliers International Group Inc. · CIGI
—
—
—
69.8
63.6
87.3
107.6
654.3
232.1
89.6
59.7
37.9
48.3
42.3
42.5
59.5
68.3
72.8
66.0
44.6
Compass, Inc. · COMP
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
365.5
—
CoStar Group, Inc. · CSGP
143.4
106.8
84.3
71.9
81.0
83.1
75.7
93.7
77.7
95.0
132.3
139.9
171.5
210.6
273.2
321.6
1,687.4
3,362.0
672.3
149.1
Cushman & Wakefield Limited · CWK
56.4
20.2
15.0
9.7
8.3
14.5
31.9
—
—
—
261.5
130.0
36.8
23.4
14.8
12.6
16.6
42.6
38.3
—
FirstService Corporation · FSV
63.1
64.4
50.3
42.8
46.3
45.1
50.9
51.4
49.2
72.4
82.1
85.1
76.0
61.0
57.4
56.0
63.1
49.1
39.3
40.3
IHS Holding Limited · IHS
—
—
221.6
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
17.4
5.0
17.8
15.5
—
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated · JLL
16.4
14.6
12.3
9.0
8.5
12.0
14.3
24.5
30.0
40.4
31.4
25.9
27.3
22.4
22.4
22.0
22.9
20.5
16.4
14.9
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. · MMI
15.7
14.5
13.3
8.8
8.4
13.3
16.6
47.7
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Newmark Group, Inc. · NMRK
5.0
4.9
5.5
7.1
7.0
17.7
18.2
36.6
80.4
45.7
50.4
39.4
51.8
37.7
31.2
28.9
32.7
25.5
18.5
18.7
The RMR Group Inc. · RMR
15.6
16.4
14.1
13.1
11.6
14.5
9.8
6.3
7.1
8.2
8.9
15.1
18.4
15.5
13.9
14.1
15.3
10.9
12.8
—
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Real Estate Services comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 1 of the 27 companies reports on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so its rank is marked stale. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- 1 company has an older fundamental reporting date than the sector’s freshest reporters; its rank carries a stale marker.
11 · evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 27 Real Estate Services companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers
Real Estate Services company comparison FAQs
These 22 answers restate the Real Estate Services comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 27 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Real Estate Services sector outperforming S&P 500?
Real Estate Services has underperformed S&P 500 by 10.5% over 52 weeks and 1.8% over 13 weeks. 5 of 26 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 12 of 26 beat the sector itself.
Which Real Estate Services company is largest by revenue?
Cushman & Wakefield Limited leads with revenue of $10,540 million, based on 20 of 27 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Real Estate Services company is growing fastest?
The Real Brokerage Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 46.8%, across 19 of 27 comparable companies.
Which Real Estate Services company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated ranks first at 64.8/100 with 57.8% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Real Estate Services company has the lowest comparable PEG?
The RMR Group Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.46, among 4 of 27 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Real Estate Services comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Which Real Estate Services company is the biggest?
Cushman & Wakefield Limited is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $10,540 million, ahead of Compass, Inc. at $8,310 million. That covers 20 of 27 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Real Estate Services company has the best profit margins?
IHS Holding Limited has the highest operating margin at 26.8%, from 23 of 27 comparable companies. Star Holdings shows the biggest recent improvement, at +21.4 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Real Estate Services company makes the most profit?
IHS Holding Limited earns the most, at $162 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 20 of 27 comparable companies. Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. has the fastest profit growth at 13.3%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Real Estate Services company earns the highest return on capital?
IHS Holding Limited leads on return on capital employed at 3.2%, across 25 of 27 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Real Estate Services stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — The RMR Group Inc. screens cheapest at 0.46×. Only 4 of 27 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Real Estate Services sector beating the market?
Real Estate Services has underperformed S&P 500 by 10.5% over the last 52 weeks and 1.8% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 5 of 26 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Real Estate Services stock has the strongest price momentum?
Rafael Holdings, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Real Estate Services company scores highest for research priority?
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated scores 64.8 out of 100 with 57.8% evidence confidence, from 21.3 points on growth and earnings, 14.8 on capital efficiency, 10.9 on valuation and 17.8 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Real Estate Services companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 27 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Real Estate Services sector?
The 27 Real Estate Services companies on this page carry $113,853 million of combined market value. CBRE Group, Inc. is the largest at $43,740 million, about 38% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.
What is the Real Estate Services sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 27 Real Estate Services companies on this page is 32×, measured on the 21 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.
How is the Real Estate Services sector performing?
5 of the 26 covered Real Estate Services companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 10.5% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.
How many Real Estate Services stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 27 listed Real Estate Services companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.