Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-05
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-08-05

IHS Holding Limited

IHS
Real Estate · Real Estate Services

IHS Holding Limited's balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup.

Biggest watch item: margins are the best this company has ever printed — every ratio flatters at record profitability, so the whole story leans on margins holding.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (68 weeks in). But the balance sheet is under water: net worth is negative, so shareholders sit behind everyone the company owes. What settles it: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first.

Price
$8.2
+26.5% 1Y
P/E
4.4×
of its own 4-year range
Revenue (Mar 26)
$0.4 B
+7.7% YoY
Profit (Mar 26)
$0.1 B
+40.0% YoY
Operating margin
26.2%
−17.4 pp YoY
ROIC
16.1%
vs WACC 8.1% → +8.0 pp
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

IHS Holding Limited trades at $8.2, in a confirmed uptrend and 68 weeks into that stage. That is +5.0% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 92% of a 52-week range of $6 to $8. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (15 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 68 of stage 2. At $8.2 it trades +5.0% versus its 200-day average and sits at 92% of its 52-week range ($6–$8).

Aug 26: $8.2 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
+5.0% versus the 200-day line, week 68 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S1S4S3S2$9.3$7.4$5.6$3.7$1.9$$8$8Jul 23Apr 24Jan 25Oct 25Aug 26
S1S4S3S2$9.3$7.4$5.6$3.7$1.9$$8$8Jul 23Jan 25Aug 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2021 Each cell is one week from 2021 to now (252 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Oct 21Aug 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 4.8 years the stock moved −51% while the S&P 500 moved +73% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (15 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-04-24) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

IHS Holding Limited trades at 4.4× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 4.4× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 4.4× vs a null× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly step line (right axis). 4.3-year window; loss-period spikes above 236× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
against too little history to rank
P/EEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
254.5×$1.5190.9×$1.1127.3×$0.763.6×$0.40.0×$0.0×$15.49×$1Apr 22Sep 22Sep 25Feb 26Aug 26
254.5×$1.5190.9×$1.1127.3×$0.763.6×$0.40.0×$0.0×$15.49×$1Apr 22Sep 25Aug 26
PEG 0.51 PEG ratio per quarter — the P/E divided by the earnings-growth rate. The dashed line marks 1.0: below it the growth is cheap against the multiple, above it the price already prices the growth in. Last 16 quarters; values above 6 pinned at the top.
below 1.0, the growth looks cheap against the multiple
PEGPEG = 1.0
6.5×4.8×3.2×1.6×0.0××0.51×Jun 22Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
6.5×4.8×3.2×1.6×0.0××0.51×Jun 22Mar 24Mar 26
P/E
4.4×
too little history to rank
PEG
1.31
as reported

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

IHS Holding Limited reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 12 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +3.3% in FY25 Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoY
28%15%1.7%−11%−24%%3.3%FY21FY23FY25
28%15%1.7%−11%−24%%3.3%FY21FY23FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue accelerating
RevenueProfit
30%67%16%−31%2.4%−130%−12%−229%−25%−327%%%4.3%40%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
30%67%16%−31%2.4%−130%−12%−229%−25%−327%%%4.3%40%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
Revenue growth
Recovering
latest +4.3% · span −21.6% to +26.4%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

The return-on-capital curve is not shown — net worth is negative, so a return on capital is not a meaningful number in any basis. This is a distressed balance sheet, and the stage is read from the growth curves alone.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+3.3%−6.9%
Stock price+26.5%+1.5%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
+7.7%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Mar 26)
+40.0%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
0.0%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

48.9/100 — rank 9 of 27 in Real Estate Services · 64% evidence confidence

IHS Holding Limited scores 48.9 out of 100 against the 27 companies it is compared with in Real Estate Services, ranking 9. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 12.2 + 15.2 + 10.8 + 10.7 = 48.9. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

IHS Holding Limited reported $0.4 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +7.7% year on year. That is the 3rd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 0.0% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $1.6 B. The last four reported quarters add to $1.7 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $1.6 B (+3.3% on the year), capping 4 years at 0.0% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.4 B, +7.7% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY25 revenue $1.6 B (+3.3% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
0.0% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
2.128%1.615%1.11.7%0.5−11%0.0−24%$ B%$2B3.3%FY21FY23FY25
2.128%1.615%1.11.7%0.5−11%0.0−24%$ B%$2B3.3%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $0.4 B (+7.7% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
3rd straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
0.621%0.47.1%0.3−6.5%0.1−20%0.0−34%$ B%$0B7.7%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.621%0.47.1%0.3−6.5%0.1−20%0.0−34%$ B%$0B7.7%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +4.4% growth against the decade's 0.0% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +4.3% over the last 4 quarters against −6.4%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

IHS Holding Limited's operating margin is 26.2% in the Mar 26 quarter, −17.4 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 15.8% to 51.9%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 26.2%, −17.4 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 15.8%–51.9%, and FY25's 51.9% is the top of that band — a record year.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −17.4 pp year on year while gross margin went −1.6 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.

FY25: 51.9% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
the widest a 15.8–51.9% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
55%14%44%8.2%34%1.9%23%−4.4%13%−11%%%51.9%12.7%FY21FY23FY25
55%14%44%8.2%34%1.9%23%−4.4%13%−11%%%51.9%12.7%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: 26.2% operating margin (−17.4 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
87%53%63%29%39%5.1%15%−19%−9.0%−42%%%26.2%−17.4%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
87%53%63%29%39%5.1%15%−19%−9.0%−42%%%26.2%−17.4%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

IHS Holding Limited earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +40.0% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.1 B. That is 16.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.1 B. 7 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Mar 26 profit was $0.1 B, +40.0% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.1 B (null).

FY25 profit $0.1 B (null YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profit
0.3−0.3−0.9−1.5−2.2$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
0.3−0.3−0.9−1.5−2.2$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $0.1 B (+40.0% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
0.41,299%−0.1−3,265%−0.7−7,830%−1.2−12,395%−1.7−16,959%$ B%$0B40%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.41,299%−0.1−3,265%−0.7−7,830%−1.2−12,395%−1.7−16,959%$ B%$0B40%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

IHS Holding Limited's cash-flow history is too thin to judge how much reported profit converts into cash. In FY25 that was $0.9 B of operating cash against $0.1 B of profit. After $0.3 B of capital spending, $0.7 B was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.

FY25: operating cash of $0.9 B against reported profit of $0.1 B, leaving free cash of $0.7 B after $0.3 B of capital spending.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $0.9 B vs profit $0.1 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
1.20.3−0.5−1.4−2.2$ B$1B$0B$1BFY21FY23FY25
1.20.3−0.5−1.4−2.2$ B$1B$0B$1BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: operating cash $0.2 B = 329% of the quarter's profit Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)Conversion100%
0.4856%0.3653%0.2450%0.1247%0.044%$ B%$0B329%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.4856%0.3653%0.2450%0.1247%0.044%$ B%$0B329%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

IHS Holding Limited does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $1.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 21.1% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $1.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $0.3 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
0.60.50.30.20.0$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
0.60.50.30.20.0$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: capex $0.1 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 12 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)Free cash
0.210.290.150.220.100.140.050.060.00−0.01$ B$ B$0B$0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.210.290.150.220.100.140.050.060.00−0.01$ B$ B$0B$0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

IHS Holding Limited earns a ROE of −144% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −569% in FY23. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +8.0 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 8.2% net margin on 0.35× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is −144%, recovered from a FY23 trough of −569% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 8.2% net margin × 0.35× asset turns × −49.89× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −143.2% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 16.1% − 8.1% = a +8.0 pp spread. The 8.1% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every dollar reinvested creates more than a dollar of value — the engine compounds.

FY25: ROE −144% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 8.1% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY23's −569%
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
617%299%−20%−338%−656%%−144.4%20.9%FY21FY23FY25
617%299%−20%−338%−656%%−144.4%20.9%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: ROIC 19.1% (TTM) vs WACC 8.1% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
1,613%1,113%613%113%−387%%19.1%−64.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1,613%1,113%613%113%−387%%19.1%−64.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
11 · Dividend

Dividend

IHS Holding Limited pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

IHS Holding Limited does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

IHS Holding Limited's net worth is negative — it owes more than it owns — so a debt-to-equity ratio is not meaningful here. On the annual view that ratio went from 1.72 in FY21 to −39.00 in FY25. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Mar 26: total debt of $3.5 B against shareholder equity of $−0.0 B — a debt-to-equity of −175.00. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 1.72 (FY21) to −39.00 (FY25). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

FY25: debt $3.5 B at −39.00× equity Total debt by fiscal year, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
4.415.8×3.31.1×2.2−13.6×1.1−28.3×0.0−43.1×$ B×$4B−39.00×FY21FY23FY25
4.415.8×3.31.1×2.2−13.6×1.1−28.3×0.0−43.1×$ B×$4B−39.00×FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: debt $3.5 B, debt-to-equity −175.00 Total debt per quarter, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
4.5119.3×3.440.3×2.2−38.8×1.1−117.8×0.0−196.8×$ B×$4B−175.00×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
4.5119.3×3.440.3×2.2−38.8×1.1−117.8×0.0−196.8×$ B×$4B−175.00×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

1.6% of IHS Holding Limited's tradable float is currently sold short — the crowd is not positioned against this stock. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 1.3 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

The latest reading: 1.6% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 1.3 days to buy those positions back. The crowd is not positioned against this stock. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.

Short interest
1.6%
of the tradable float
Days to cover
1.3
at typical volumes

Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

IHS Holding Limited: the Z-score reads −0.61. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits inside the distress zone. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

🚨 Why it matters: a Z-score of −0.61 is inside the distress zone — the balance sheet is a real risk, not a detail.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads −0.61.

15 · Related companies · Real Estate Services
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Jones Lang LaSalle IncorporatedJLL 64.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 21.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.1 pp 45% evidence 14.8/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 3.2% 76% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 14.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.8/20 RS sector 17.1% · RS bench 4.1% · 1Y 32.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.3 + 14.8 + 10.9 + 17.8 = 64.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
2The RMR Group Inc.RMR 60.7/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 16.0/35 Revenue -20.4% · PAT 0% · OPM change 0.3 pp 83% evidence 14.3/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 4.8% 76% evidence 16.2/20 P/E 12.8× · PEG 0.46 65% evidence 14.2/20 RS sector 11.1% · RS bench -0.5% · 1Y 18.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16 + 14.3 + 16.2 + 14.2 = 60.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is -0.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
3CBRE Group, Inc.CBRE 56.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.8 pp 45% evidence 15.4/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 4.9% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 30.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.2/20 RS sector 1.8% · RS bench -10% · 1Y -2.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.8 + 15.4 + 10.2 + 11.2 = 56.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4Star HoldingsSTHO 53.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 21.3/35 Revenue 11.5% · PAT — · OPM change 21.4 pp 62% evidence 7.1/25 ROCE -1.2% · OPM -29.6% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 2.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.8/20 RS sector 10.9% · RS bench -1% · 1Y 26.6%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.3 + 7.1 + 11.5 + 13.8 = 53.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5FirstService CorporationFSV 53.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 20.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.4 pp 45% evidence 15.7/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 3.5% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 40.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.2/20 RS sector -8.7% · RS bench -19.5% · 1Y -28.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20 + 15.7 + 9.7 + 8.2 = 53.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Marcus & Millichap, Inc.MMI 53.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 22.3/35 Revenue 9.7% · PAT — · OPM change 8.8 pp 62% evidence 8.4/25 ROCE -0.8% · OPM -3.4% 76% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 47.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.9/20 RS sector 8.3% · RS bench -3.7% · 1Y 6.4%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 22.3 + 8.4 + 9.4 + 12.9 = 53 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7CoStar Group, Inc.CSGP 50.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 22.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 6.2 pp 45% evidence 12.3/25 ROCE 0.8% · OPM 0.3% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 149.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.6/20 RS sector -44.2% · RS bench -51.8% · 1Y -68.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.9 + 12.3 + 9.3 + 5.6 = 50.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Newmark Group, Inc.NMRK 49.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 20.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5.8 pp 45% evidence 13.3/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 3.2% 76% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 18.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.2/20 RS sector -2.6% · RS bench -13.9% · 1Y -2.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.6 + 13.3 + 10.5 + 5.2 = 49.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9IHS Holding Limitedthis pageIHS 48.9/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 12.2/35 Revenue 3.7% · PAT — · OPM change -15.5 pp 62% evidence 15.2/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 26.8% 76% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 15.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.7/20 RS sector 7.5% · RS bench -3.8% · 1Y 23.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.2 + 15.2 + 10.8 + 10.7 = 48.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.TCI 48.5/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence BREAKING OUT 14.8/35 Revenue 2.1% · PAT 0% · OPM change -10.6 pp 83% evidence 9.8/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -15.9% 76% evidence 15.0/20 P/E 32× · PEG 0.54 65% evidence 8.9/20 RS sector -0.9% · RS bench -12.5% · 1Y 4.4%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 14.8 + 9.8 + 15 + 8.9 = 48.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
11Compass, Inc.COMP 47.7/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence BREAKING OUT 14.9/35 Revenue 40.1% · PAT — · OPM change -9 pp 62% evidence 4.2/25 ROCE -8.9% · OPM -13% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 365.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 19.6/20 RS sector 27% · RS bench 12.7% · 1Y 47.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.9 + 4.2 + 9 + 19.6 = 47.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 12.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
12Colliers International Group Inc.CIGI 47.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.1 pp 45% evidence 14.1/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 2.7% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 44.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.3/20 RS sector -21.1% · RS bench -30.9% · 1Y -37%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.3 + 14.1 + 9.6 + 6.3 = 47.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13Cushman & Wakefield LimitedCWK 46.6/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence BASING 18.3/35 Revenue 10.4% · PAT -53.8% · OPM change 0.3 pp 83% evidence 11.8/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 2.3% 76% evidence 9.9/20 P/E 38.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.6/20 RS sector -2.5% · RS bench -13.9% · 1Y 2.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.3 + 11.8 + 9.9 + 6.6 = 46.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
14American Realty Investors, Inc.ARL 43.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 15.0/35 Revenue 4.2% · PAT — · OPM change -11 pp 62% evidence 9.1/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -17.8% 76% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 20.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.7/20 RS sector -1.2% · RS bench -12.2% · 1Y 20%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15 + 9.1 + 10.3 + 8.7 = 43.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
15The Real Brokerage Inc.REAX 42.8/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence BASING 23.9/35 Revenue 46.8% · PAT — · OPM change 0.8 pp 62% evidence 5.2/25 ROCE -7% · OPM -0.7% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.7/20 RS sector -42.9% · RS bench -50.6% · 1Y -55.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 23.9 + 5.2 + 10 + 3.7 = 42.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
16Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.SEG 41.4/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence BREAKING OUT 12.3/35 Revenue 13.4% · PAT — · OPM change -130.3 pp 62% evidence 3.8/25 ROCE -7% · OPM -333.8% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 15.3/20 RS sector 15.9% · RS bench 3.3% · 1Y 13%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.3 + 3.8 + 10 + 15.3 = 41.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.RMAX 38.7/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence ASLEEP 9.2/35 Revenue -5% · PAT -90% · OPM change -18.3 pp 62% evidence 7.5/25 ROCE -1.8% · OPM -11.1% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 576× · PEG 1.66 65% evidence 13.3/20 RS sector 17% · RS bench 4.2% · 1Y 20.5%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 9.2 + 7.5 + 8.7 + 13.3 = 38.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 4.2%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
18FRP Holdings, Inc.FRPH 38.0/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence TURNING 11.7/35 Revenue 4.8% · PAT -85.7% · OPM change -17.8 pp 83% evidence 10.9/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM 4.8% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 547× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.7/20 RS sector -3.7% · RS bench -14.5% · 1Y -13.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 11.7 + 10.9 + 8.7 + 6.7 = 38 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
19AGNT, IncAGNT 37.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 18.6/35 Revenue 5.3% · PAT — · OPM change 0.2 pp 62% evidence 7.5/25 ROCE -3.8% · OPM -0.9% 76% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 406× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -46.1% · RS bench -53.2% · 1Y -57.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.6 + 7.5 + 8.8 + 3 = 37.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
20Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.MLP 37.4/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence TURNING 11.4/35 Revenue 20% · PAT -500% · OPM change -28.5 pp 83% evidence 4.9/25 ROCE -5.5% · OPM -59.2% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 239.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.0/20 RS sector 6.6% · RS bench -5.2% · 1Y 4.9%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 11.4 + 4.9 + 9.1 + 12 = 37.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
21Douglas Elliman Inc.DOUG 32.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 9.7/35 Revenue -5.3% · PAT — · OPM change -6.1 pp 62% evidence 6.3/25 ROCE -4.8% · OPM -8.2% 76% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 13.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.2/20 RS sector -20.5% · RS bench -30.3% · 1Y -21.4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9.7 + 6.3 + 11.1 + 5.2 = 32.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
22Seritage Growth PropertiesSRG 31.0/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence ASLEEP 9.2/35 Revenue 0% · PAT — · OPM change -635.5 pp 62% evidence 7.3/25 ROCE -4.2% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 4.5/20 RS sector -22.5% · RS bench -32% · 1Y -15%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9.2 + 7.3 + 10 + 4.5 = 31 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
23Opendoor Technologies Inc.OPEN 23.0/100Adverse evidence61% evidence ASLEEP 7.9/35 Revenue -23.2% · PAT — · OPM change -17.2 pp 62% evidence 4.0/25 ROCE -7.5% · OPM -22.1% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 1.1/20 RS sector -27.1% · RS bench -36.1% · 1Y 111.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 7.9 + 4 + 10 + 1.1 = 23 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
24Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.CHCI 64.1/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence BASING 23.0/35 Revenue 24.1% · PAT 13.3% · OPM change — 45% evidence 13.6/25 ROCE — · OPM — 15% evidence 15.9/20 P/E 11.4× · PEG 0.83 65% evidence 11.6/20 RS sector 5.6% · RS bench -5.7% · 1Y 11.9%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 23 + 13.6 + 15.9 + 11.6 = 64.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
25Rafael Holdings, Inc.RFL 54.8/100Thin evidence · provisional24% evidence BREAKING OUT 16.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 8% evidence 10.9/25 ROCE — · OPM — 15% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 18.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.0/20 RS sector 34.8% · RS bench 20.9% · 1Y 23.5%9 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.3 + 10.9 + 10.6 + 17 = 54.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
26New England Realty Associates Limited PartnershipNEN 43.7/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence BASING 11.8/35 Revenue 14.8% · PAT -112.5% · OPM change -23.9 pp 83% evidence 11.9/25 ROCE 0.4% · OPM 6.2% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y -20.2%0 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 11.8 + 11.9 + 10 + 10 = 43.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
27Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.HBNB 43.1/100Thin evidence · provisional29% evidence ASLEEP 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence 8.9/25 ROCE -1.7% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 5.9/20 RS sector -7.9% · RS bench -17.5% · 1Y 213.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.3 + 8.9 + 10 + 5.9 = 43.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is IHS Holding Limited's stock price today?

IHS Holding Limited trades at $8.2, +26.5% over the past year. The company is valued at $3.0 B. The stock sits at 92% of its 52-week range of $6–$8, +5.0% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 68 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.

What were IHS Holding Limited's latest quarterly results?

IHS Holding Limited reported revenue of $0.4 B and net profit of $0.1 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 7.7% and profit rose 40.0% year on year. Earnings per share were $0.22. The operating margin was 26.2%, 17.4 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is IHS Holding Limited's revenue?

IHS Holding Limited reported revenue of $0.4 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +7.7% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $1.6 B (+3.3%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 0.0% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is IHS Holding Limited's profit?

IHS Holding Limited earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +40.0% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.1 B. The operating margin ran 26.2% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is IHS Holding Limited's market cap?

IHS Holding Limited's market capitalisation is $3.0 B at a stock price of $8.2. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.

Does IHS Holding Limited pay a dividend?

No — IHS Holding Limited has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is IHS Holding Limited growing?

Yes — IHS Holding Limited is growing: latest-quarter revenue +7.7% year on year, profit +40.0%, and the margin −17.4 pp at 26.2%. The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 5 August 2026.

How is IHS Holding Limited performing?

IHS Holding Limited is in a confirmed uptrend, 68 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 7.7% and profit rose 40.0% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 15 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is IHS Holding Limited in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 68 of stage 2), trading +5.0% versus its 200-day average and at 92% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.

Is IHS Holding Limited beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view IHS Holding Limited is currently behind the S&P 500 (15 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-04-24), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 4.8 years the stock moved −51% against the S&P 500's +73% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.

Will IHS Holding Limited's stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for IHS Holding Limited. What it measures instead: the stock price is $8.2, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 68 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is the market betting against IHS Holding Limited?

No — short interest is 1.6% of IHS Holding Limited's tradable float, about 1.3 days to cover at typical volumes. That is a low reading: the crowd is not positioned against this stock. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.

What is IHS Holding Limited's capex?

IHS Holding Limited spent $1.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.3 B. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is IHS Holding Limited's cash flow?

IHS Holding Limited generated $0.9 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $0.7 B of free cash flow after $0.3 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.1 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.

How financially safe is IHS Holding Limited?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads −0.61 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is inside the danger band — a real balance-sheet risk. — as of 5 August 2026.

Where is IHS Holding Limited in its business cycle?

IHS Holding Limited's FY25 operating margin was 51.9%, against a 5-year band of 15.8%–51.9%: the top of the band — a record year. Record profitability is late-cycle territory: every ratio flatters at the top, and the story leans on margins holding. The latest quarter ran 26.2%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.

What could break the IHS Holding Limited story?

Biggest watch item: margins are the best this company has ever printed — every ratio flatters at record profitability, so the whole story leans on margins holding. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.

Is IHS Holding Limited a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: IHS Holding Limited's balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup. The sharpest open question: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI