Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-04
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Metal Fabrication Stocks

Metal Fabrication: Commercial Metals Company owns the largest revenue base; Tredegar Corporation has the fastest current growth.

01 · the industry itself · before any single company

How has Metal Fabrication moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 57% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 35% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of S&P 500 on a rolling three-month view for 4 weeks running.

TURNING · ahead 4wPrice and the fundamentals both up5 of 12 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months2 are 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more

RS ↑4w · 9/12 >200d (+4) · 5/12 lead (+2) · EPS 8/12↑

20050020262025202420232022 769348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100110Jun 22Dec 22Jun 23Dec 23Jun 24Dec 24Jun 25Dec 25Jun 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 6 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 10 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 11 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 101, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 10 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 75, against 100 at the start · down 35.1% on a year ago · 8 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 82, against 100 at the start · down 27.7% on a year ago · 10 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 80, against 100 at the start · down 25.5% on a year ago · 12 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 81, against 100 at the start · down 8.5% on a year ago · 11 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 70, against 100 at the start · down 16.3% on a year ago · 10 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 65, against 100 at the start · down 20.7% on a year ago · 10 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 33, against 100 at the start · down 34.4% on a year ago · 10 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 16, against 100 at the start · down 9.3% on a year ago · 10 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 16, against 100 at the start · down 14.3% on a year ago · 9 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 28, against 100 at the start · up 8.7% on a year ago · 10 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 34, against 100 at the start · up 8.6% on a year ago · 10 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 50, against 100 at the start · up 29.4% on a year ago · 11 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 43, against 100 at the start · up 39.2% on a year ago · 9 reportingJun 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 60, against 100 at the start · up 64.4% on a year ago · 3 reporting · thin coverageNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two60No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
20050020262025202420232022 769348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100110Jun 22Jun 23Jun 24Jun 25Jun 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 6 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 10 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 11 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 101, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 10 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 75, against 100 at the start · down 35.1% on a year ago · 8 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 82, against 100 at the start · down 27.7% on a year ago · 10 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 80, against 100 at the start · down 25.5% on a year ago · 12 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 81, against 100 at the start · down 8.5% on a year ago · 11 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 70, against 100 at the start · down 16.3% on a year ago · 10 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 65, against 100 at the start · down 20.7% on a year ago · 10 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 33, against 100 at the start · down 34.4% on a year ago · 10 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 16, against 100 at the start · down 9.3% on a year ago · 10 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 16, against 100 at the start · down 14.3% on a year ago · 9 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 28, against 100 at the start · up 8.7% on a year ago · 10 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 34, against 100 at the start · up 8.6% on a year ago · 10 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 50, against 100 at the start · up 29.4% on a year ago · 11 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 43, against 100 at the start · up 39.2% on a year ago · 9 reportingJun 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 60, against 100 at the start · up 64.4% on a year ago · 3 reporting · thin coverageNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two60No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Metal Fabrication, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 12 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Metal Fabrication outperforming S&P 500?

Metal Fabrication has outperformed S&P 500 by 27.3% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 1.6%. 6 of 12 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. ATI Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +25.2%.

+1.6%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+27.3%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
6/12Stocks leading S&P 500
5/12Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Metal Fabrication has outperformed S&P 500 by 27.3% over 52 weeks and 1.6% over 13 weeks. 6 of 12 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 5 of 12 beat the sector itself. Commercial Metals Company leads with revenue of $8,850 million, based on 6 of 14 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Companies
14
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$93.1B
Carpenter Technology Corporation
Revenue growing
5/6
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
6/12
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 14
03 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Carpenter Technology Corporation has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 57.8% evidence confidence.
ATI Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Carpenter Technology CorporationCRS 63.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 21.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 4 pp 45% evidence 13.9/25 ROCE 6.5% · OPM 23% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 58.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 19.2/20 RS sector 24.1% · RS bench 35.7% · 1Y 129.2%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.7 + 13.9 + 9 + 19.2 = 63.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
2Worthington Enterprises, Inc.WOR 63.2/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence TURNING 32.4/35 Revenue 19.7% · PAT 63.2% · OPM change 15.8 pp 95% evidence 8.5/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 6.2% 76% evidence 15.1/20 P/E 18.1× · PEG 0.37 65% evidence 7.2/20 RS sector -15.9% · RS bench -5.6% · 1Y -6.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 32.4 + 8.5 + 15.1 + 7.2 = 63.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Commercial Metals CompanyCMC 56.2/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 26.9/35 Revenue 15.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3.2 pp 95% evidence 12.4/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 9.2% 76% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 14.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.9/20 RS sector -11.8% · RS bench -2% · 1Y 34.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26.9 + 12.4 + 11 + 5.9 = 56.2 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -11.8% and the one-year return is 34.5%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
4Proto Labs, Inc.PRLB 55.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 20.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.5 pp 45% evidence 8.8/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 7.1% 76% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 65.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.2/20 RS sector 19.6% · RS bench 32% · 1Y 89.6%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.2 + 8.8 + 8.8 + 17.2 = 55 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Mueller Industries, Inc.MLI 53.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 19.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5.6 pp 45% evidence 17.0/25 ROCE 9.3% · OPM 26.2% 76% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 16.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.7/20 RS sector -5% · RS bench 5.4% · 1Y 53.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.5 + 17 + 10.4 + 6.7 = 53.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Tredegar CorporationTG 50.6/100Mixed-positive evidence68% evidence ASLEEP 22.5/35 Revenue 20.2% · PAT — · OPM change 2 pp 62% evidence 7.8/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 3.4% 76% evidence 16.5/20 P/E 9.5× · PEG 0.26 65% evidence 3.8/20 RS sector -23.2% · RS bench -14.3% · 1Y -5.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 22.5 + 7.8 + 16.5 + 3.8 = 50.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7ATI Inc.ATI 50.0/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence BREAKING OUT 14.1/35 Revenue 3% · PAT 5.8% · OPM change 1.4 pp 83% evidence 13.5/25 ROCE 4% · OPM 14.2% 76% evidence 4.3/20 P/E 46.5× · PEG 4.94 65% evidence 18.1/20 RS sector 25.2% · RS bench 36.1% · 1Y 174%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.1 + 13.5 + 4.3 + 18.1 = 50 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 36.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
8Insteel Industries Inc.IIIN 40.6/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence TURNING 13.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4.2 pp 45% evidence 11.4/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 3.9% 76% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 16.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.7/20 RS sector -19.8% · RS bench -9.7% · 1Y -8.2%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13.8 + 11.4 + 10.7 + 4.7 = 40.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9ESAB CorporationESAB 39.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence BASING 15.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4.1 pp 39% evidence 11.8/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 12.1% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 28.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -30.1% · RS bench -21.4% · 1Y -14.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.5 + 11.8 + 9.6 + 3 = 39.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
10Ampco-Pittsburgh CorporationAP 39.7/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence ASLEEP 9.6/35 Revenue 6.1% · PAT -1042.9% · OPM change -1.4 pp 83% evidence 3.8/25 ROCE -0.7% · OPM -2.6% 76% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 9.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.1/20 RS sector 23.9% · RS bench 31.9% · 1Y 163.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9.6 + 3.8 + 11.2 + 15.1 = 39.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 31.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
11Ryerson Holding CorporationRYZ 39.3/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence ASLEEP 18.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.3 pp 45% evidence 6.0/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 1.5% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 109.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.6/20 RS sector -13.2% · RS bench -3.6% · 1Y 30.2%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.2 + 6 + 8.5 + 6.6 = 39.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12Mayville Engineering Company, Inc.MEC 35.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence FADING 8.2/35 Revenue -0.2% · PAT -169.6% · OPM change -6.5 pp 62% evidence 3.7/25 ROCE -1.8% · OPM -5.3% 76% evidence 9.9/20 P/E 23.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.7/20 RS sector 9.8% · RS bench 19.9% · 1Y 102.7%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 8.2 + 3.7 + 9.9 + 13.7 = 35.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13Xinxu Copper Industry Technology LimitedXXC 54.6/100Thin evidence · provisional11% evidence 17.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 0% evidence 17.1/25 ROCE 18.1% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence
Exact sum: 17.5 + 17.1 + 10 + 10 = 54.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
14Nintech Mould Factory Inc.NTMJ 52.8/100Thin evidence · provisional11% evidence 17.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 0% evidence 15.3/25 ROCE 14% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence
Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.3 + 10 + 10 = 52.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
Showing 10 of 14 companies
04 · what price has already done

Market action

ATI Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Metal Fabrication at +174%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +36.1%. 6 of 12 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Commercial Metals Company has the highest Revenue among the 14 Metal Fabrication companies compared here, at $8,850 million. ATI Inc. is next at $4,595 million. Tredegar Corporation has the highest Revenue growth at 20.2%, so level and change sit with different companies. 6 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Commercial Metals Company is the scale leader at $8,850 million, 92.6% ahead of ATI Inc.. Tredegar Corporation's growth is 20.2% from a $744 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderCommercial Metals Company · $8,850 million
Gap92.6% versus #2 · ATI Inc.
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/14 companies · 224 observations

Investor read: Commercial Metals Company is the scale benchmark; Tredegar Corporation is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Commercial Metals Company's growth falls below Tredegar Corporation's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenue · company comparison
6/14 level · 6/14 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Commercial Metals Company CMC$2.5B23%Jun 2026
Ryerson Holding Corporation RYZ$1.6B38%Jun 2026
Mueller Industries, Inc. MLI$1.2B19%Jun 2026
ATI Inc. ATI$1.2B0.7%Mar 2026
Carpenter Technology Corporation CRS$812M12%Jun 2026
ESAB Corporation ESAB$746M10%Jun 2026
Worthington Enterprises, Inc. WOR$371M17%Jun 2026
Tredegar Corporation TG$186M13%Mar 2026
Insteel Industries Inc. IIIN$173M7.5%Jun 2026
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. MEC$145M6.6%Mar 2026
Proto Labs, Inc. PRLB$139M10%Jun 2026
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation AP$103M4.0%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation · AP

$79M
$88M
$92M
$100M
$97M
$91M
$102M
$107M
$102M
$104M
$110M
$107M
$92M
$98M
$99M
$109M
$104M
$104M
$103M

ATI Inc. · ATI

$726M
$765M
$960M
$1.0B
$1.0B
$1.0B
$1.0B
$1.0B
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.2B

Carpenter Technology Corporation · CRS

$388M
$396M
$489M
$564M
$523M
$579M
$690M
$758M
$652M
$624M
$685M
$799M
$718M
$677M
$727M
$756M
$734M
$728M
$812M

Commercial Metals Company · CMC

$2.0B
$2.0B
$2.0B
$2.5B
$2.4B
$2.2B
$2.0B
$2.3B
$2.2B
$2.0B
$1.8B
$2.1B
$2.0B
$1.9B
$1.8B
$2.0B
$2.1B
$2.1B
$2.1B
$2.5B

ESAB Corporation · ESAB

$630M
$606M
$648M
$661M
$664M
$684M
$720M
$681M
$689M
$690M
$707M
$673M
$671M
$678M
$716M
$728M
$746M

Insteel Industries Inc. · IIIN

$161M
$171M
$178M
$213M
$227M
$208M
$159M
$166M
$122M
$127M
$146M
$134M
$130M
$161M
$180M
$177M
$160M
$173M

Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. · MEC

$109M
$113M
$136M
$138M
$136M
$129M
$143M
$139M
$158M
$149M
$161M
$164M
$135M
$121M
$136M
$132M
$144M
$134M
$145M

Mueller Industries, Inc. · MLI

$982M
$956M
$1.0B
$1.2B
$945M
$878M
$971M
$897M
$732M
$850M
$998M
$998M
$924M
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$962M
$1.2B

Proto Labs, Inc. · PRLB

$125M
$124M
$124M
$127M
$122M
$116M
$126M
$122M
$131M
$125M
$128M
$126M
$126M
$122M
$126M
$135M
$135M
$136M
$139M

Ryerson Holding Corporation · RYZ

$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.5B
$1.3B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.6B

Tredegar Corporation · TG

$210M
$221M
$237M
$274M
$238M
$189M
$191M
$178M
$166M
$38M
$144M
$154M
$146M
$154M
$165M
$179M
$195M
$184M
$186M

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. · WOR

$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.4B
$1.5B
$1.4B
$1.2B
$346M
$369M
$312M
$298M
$317M
$319M
$257M
$274M
$305M
$318M
$304M
$327M
$379M
$371M

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation · AP

11%
23%
3.4%
11%
7.0%
5.2%
14%
7.8%
0.0%
-9.8%
-5.8%
-10%
1.9%
13%
6.1%
4.0%

ATI Inc. · ATI

56%
42%
32%
8.1%
1.4%
3.3%
5.5%
0.5%
14%
9.7%
4.1%
7.1%
0.3%
0.7%

Carpenter Technology Corporation · CRS

34%
35%
46%
41%
34%
25%
7.8%
-0.7%
5.4%
10%
8.5%
6.1%
-5.4%
2.2%
7.5%
12%

Commercial Metals Company · CMC

19%
12%
0.5%
-6.8%
-8.2%
-10%
-8.4%
-11%
-9.6%
-4.6%
-5.1%
-2.8%
6.0%
11%
22%
23%

ESAB Corporation · ESAB

4.9%
9.6%
11%
3.0%
3.8%
0.9%
-1.8%
-1.2%
-2.6%
-4.1%
6.4%
8.5%
10%

Insteel Industries Inc. · IIIN

41%
22%
-25%
-27%
-41%
-8.2%
-19%
6.6%
27%
23%
32%
23%
7.5%

Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. · MEC

15%
25%
14%
5.2%
0.7%
16%
16%
13%
18%
-15%
-19%
-16%
-20%
6.7%
11%
6.6%

Mueller Industries, Inc. · MLI

14%
-3.8%
-8.2%
-16%
-5.1%
-17%
2.8%
11%
26%
18%
14%
8.0%
4.1%
19%

Proto Labs, Inc. · PRLB

3.3%
-2.4%
-6.5%
1.6%
-3.9%
7.4%
7.8%
1.6%
3.3%
-3.8%
-2.4%
-1.6%
7.1%
7.1%
11%
10%

Ryerson Holding Corporation · RYZ

23%
-2.0%
-16%
-20%
-23%
-19%
-14%
-12%
-8.8%
-9.6%
-9.4%
-8.3%
-4.7%
3.1%
9.7%
38%

Tredegar Corporation · TG

30%
13%
-14%
-19%
-35%
-30%
-80%
-25%
-13%
-12%
305%
15%
16%
34%
19%
13%

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. · WOR

27%
-4.6%
-75%
-76%
-78%
-75%
-8.4%
-14%
-18%
-8.1%
-3.8%
-0.3%
18%
19%
24%
17%
06 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Mueller Industries, Inc. has the highest OPM among the 14 Metal Fabrication companies compared here, at 26.2%. Carpenter Technology Corporation is next at 23%. Worthington Enterprises, Inc. has the highest Margin change at +15.8 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 12 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Mueller Industries, Inc. leads opm at 26.2%; Worthington Enterprises, Inc. leads margin change at +15.8 percentage points.

LeaderMueller Industries, Inc. · 26.2%
Gap13.9% versus #2 · Carpenter Technology Corporation
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/14 companies · 224 observations

Investor read: Mueller Industries, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Operating margin · company comparison
12/14 level · 12/14 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Mueller Industries, Inc. MLI26%+5.6 ppJun 2026
Carpenter Technology Corporation CRS23%+4.0 ppJun 2026
ATI Inc. ATI14%+1.4 ppMar 2026
ESAB Corporation ESAB12%−4.1 ppJun 2026
Commercial Metals Company CMC9.2%+3.2 ppJun 2026
Proto Labs, Inc. PRLB7.1%+3.5 ppJun 2026
Worthington Enterprises, Inc. WOR6.2%+15.8 ppJun 2026
Insteel Industries Inc. IIIN3.9%−4.2 ppJun 2026
Tredegar Corporation TG3.4%+2.0 ppMar 2026
Ryerson Holding Corporation RYZ1.5%+1.3 ppJun 2026
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation AP-2.6%−1.4 ppMar 2026
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. MEC-5.3%−6.5 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation · AP

-6.3%
-3.2%
-2.9%
-0.2%
-2.3%
-2.2%
-0.4%
2.8%
1.7%
-44%
-0.1%
1.0%
-2.4%
-2.3%
-1.2%
-6.7%
-3.0%
-6.7%
-2.6%

ATI Inc. · ATI

4.1%
8.8%
-1.2%
11%
14%
11%
12%
12%
11%
13%
14%
18%
13%
14%
14%
15%
14%

Carpenter Technology Corporation · CRS

-4.9%
-8.0%
0.2%
4.4%
1.6%
3.9%
5.7%
8.3%
11%
11%
11%
14%
16%
18%
19%
20%
21%
21%
23%

Commercial Metals Company · CMC

10%
14%
13%
17%
15%
16%
12%
14%
11%
12%
7.0%
8.3%
7.6%
-12%
2.7%
6.0%
9.9%
9.8%
7.1%
9.2%

ESAB Corporation · ESAB

13%
13%
13%
13%
12%
13%
15%
15%
15%
16%
17%
16%
17%
16%
15%
15%
12%

Insteel Industries Inc. · IIIN

15%
19%
17%
23%
22%
15%
3.7%
7.5%
-0.1%
6.1%
5.1%
3.5%
0.5%
8.1%
11%
11%
5.8%
3.9%

Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. · MEC

0.8%
-15%
4.1%
6.1%
6.5%
2.2%
3.3%
3.1%
3.7%
3.6%
4.7%
5.0%
4.2%
19%
1.2%
0.1%
0.0%
-4.1%
-5.3%

Mueller Industries, Inc. · MLI

24%
18%
21%
23%
22%
22%
24%
24%
19%
22%
21%
21%
18%
21%
27%
26%
18%
26%

Proto Labs, Inc. · PRLB

5.5%
11%
6.4%
4.1%
5.0%
1.2%
3.0%
4.6%
8.0%
6.7%
5.3%
4.8%
6.8%
-1.2%
3.6%
3.7%
6.5%
5.5%
7.1%

Ryerson Holding Corporation · RYZ

12%
9.7%
13%
16%
5.5%
-2.1%
5.0%
4.3%
4.5%
3.9%
0.1%
1.9%
0.5%
0.3%
0.2%
0.5%
-0.1%
-3.1%
1.5%

Tredegar Corporation · TG

4.1%
4.4%
7.7%
7.4%
1.3%
-2.6%
0.7%
-11%
-36%
-166%
4.3%
6.5%
-0.9%
3.2%
1.4%
1.8%
5.1%
6.3%
3.4%

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. · WOR

12%
7.3%
2.7%
4.3%
4.7%
-0.6%
1.2%
4.1%
-2.3%
-4.8%
1.4%
-18%
-1.8%
1.3%
6.9%
-9.6%
3.0%
3.7%
8.3%
6.2%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation · AP

+1.5 pp
+4.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+2.5 pp
+3.0 pp
+4.0 pp
−42.0 pp
+0.3 pp
−1.8 pp
−4.1 pp
+41.9 pp
−1.1 pp
−7.7 pp
−0.6 pp
−4.4 pp
−1.4 pp

ATI Inc. · ATI

+0.6 pp
+6.9 pp
+4.8 pp
+12.0 pp
+0.5 pp
−2.6 pp
+2.2 pp
+2.0 pp
+5.6 pp
+1.8 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.9 pp
−3.3 pp
+1.4 pp

Carpenter Technology Corporation · CRS

+21.2 pp
+6.5 pp
+11.9 pp
+5.5 pp
+3.9 pp
+9.0 pp
+7.3 pp
+5.4 pp
+5.3 pp
+5.2 pp
+6.4 pp
+7.9 pp
+6.4 pp
+5.1 pp
+3.7 pp
+4.0 pp

Commercial Metals Company · CMC

+4.6 pp
+2.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−3.0 pp
−3.4 pp
−4.0 pp
−5.2 pp
−5.3 pp
−3.7 pp
−23.3 pp
−4.3 pp
−2.3 pp
+2.3 pp
+21.3 pp
+4.4 pp
+3.2 pp

ESAB Corporation · ESAB

−0.1 pp
−1.2 pp
+2.2 pp
+1.9 pp
+3.2 pp
+2.7 pp
+1.8 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.6 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.5 pp
−2.0 pp
−4.1 pp

Insteel Industries Inc. · IIIN

+7.1 pp
−3.9 pp
−19.5 pp
−14.4 pp
−15.2 pp
+1.4 pp
−4.0 pp
+0.6 pp
+2.0 pp
+5.6 pp
+7.1 pp
+5.3 pp
−4.2 pp

Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. · MEC

+2.1 pp
+5.7 pp
+17.4 pp
−0.8 pp
−3.0 pp
−2.8 pp
+1.4 pp
+1.4 pp
+1.9 pp
+0.5 pp
+15.4 pp
−3.5 pp
−4.9 pp
−4.2 pp
−23.1 pp
−6.5 pp

Mueller Industries, Inc. · MLI

+7.8 pp
−2.1 pp
+3.7 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.8 pp
−3.2 pp
−2.6 pp
−2.8 pp
−0.1 pp
−1.0 pp
+5.7 pp
+4.9 pp
−0.5 pp
+5.6 pp

Proto Labs, Inc. · PRLB

−9.0 pp
−0.5 pp
−9.4 pp
−3.4 pp
+0.5 pp
+3.0 pp
+5.5 pp
+2.3 pp
+0.2 pp
−1.2 pp
−7.9 pp
−1.7 pp
−1.1 pp
−0.3 pp
+6.7 pp
+3.5 pp

Ryerson Holding Corporation · RYZ

+4.7 pp
−6.2 pp
−11.8 pp
−8.4 pp
−12.1 pp
−1.0 pp
+6.0 pp
−4.9 pp
−2.4 pp
−4.0 pp
−3.6 pp
+0.1 pp
−1.4 pp
−0.6 pp
−3.4 pp
+1.3 pp

Tredegar Corporation · TG

−1.7 pp
−2.8 pp
−7.0 pp
−7.0 pp
−18.5 pp
−37.7 pp
−163.8 pp
+3.6 pp
+17.6 pp
+35.5 pp
+169.6 pp
−2.9 pp
−4.7 pp
+6.0 pp
+3.1 pp
+2.0 pp

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. · WOR

−7.5 pp
−7.9 pp
−1.5 pp
−0.2 pp
−7.0 pp
−4.2 pp
+0.2 pp
−21.7 pp
+0.5 pp
+6.1 pp
+5.5 pp
+8.0 pp
+4.8 pp
+2.4 pp
+1.4 pp
+15.8 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Commercial Metals Company has the highest Net profit among the 14 Metal Fabrication companies compared here, at $595 million. ATI Inc. is next at $440 million. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at the 100% top of the scoring scale. 6 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Commercial Metals Company leads with $595 million of TTM profit, 35.2% above ATI Inc.. Commercial Metals Company shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (1552.8% uncapped) growth from a $595 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderCommercial Metals Company · $595 million
Gap35.2% versus #2 · ATI Inc.
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/14 companies · 224 observations

Investor read: Commercial Metals Company sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profit · company comparison
6/14 level · 4/14 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Mueller Industries, Inc. MLI$241M52%Jun 2026
Commercial Metals Company CMC$173M108%Jun 2026
Carpenter Technology Corporation CRS$140M47%Jun 2026
ATI Inc. ATI$121M20%Mar 2026
ESAB Corporation ESAB$52M-29%Jun 2026
Worthington Enterprises, Inc. WOR$48M1,100%Jun 2026
Proto Labs, Inc. PRLB$8M100%Jun 2026
Ryerson Holding Corporation RYZ$5M-900%Jun 2026
Insteel Industries Inc. IIIN$5M-50%Jun 2026
Tredegar Corporation TG$5M400%Mar 2026
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation AP$0M-100%Mar 2026
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. MEC$-8M-125%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation · AP

$-1M
$-12M
$0M
$3M
$1M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$-41M
$-2M
$3M
$-1M
$3M
$2M
$-7M
$-2M
$-57M
$0M

ATI Inc. · ATI

$55M
$198M
$-34M
$64M
$274M
$87M
$94M
$94M
$68M
$86M
$87M
$142M
$101M
$104M
$114M
$101M
$121M

Carpenter Technology Corporation · CRS

$-15M
$-29M
$-8M
$3M
$-7M
$6M
$19M
$38M
$44M
$43M
$6M
$94M
$85M
$84M
$95M
$112M
$123M
$105M
$140M

Commercial Metals Company · CMC

$152M
$233M
$383M
$312M
$289M
$262M
$180M
$234M
$184M
$176M
$86M
$119M
$104M
$-176M
$25M
$83M
$152M
$177M
$93M
$173M

ESAB Corporation · ESAB

$78M
$61M
$58M
$58M
$60M
$34M
$69M
$61M
$60M
$63M
$86M
$71M
$74M
$73M
$70M
$65M
$52M

Insteel Industries Inc. · IIIN

$18M
$25M
$23M
$39M
$39M
$24M
$5M
$11M
$1M
$7M
$7M
$5M
$1M
$10M
$15M
$15M
$8M
$5M

Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. · MEC

$0M
$-14M
$4M
$6M
$7M
$2M
$3M
$2M
$1M
$2M
$3M
$4M
$3M
$16M
$0M
$-1M
$-3M
$-4M
$-8M

Mueller Industries, Inc. · MLI

$172M
$127M
$159M
$208M
$156M
$140M
$175M
$180M
$119M
$142M
$163M
$172M
$141M
$159M
$248M
$210M
$156M
$241M

Proto Labs, Inc. · PRLB

$5M
$12M
$5M
$3M
$4M
$-115M
$3M
$0M
$8M
$7M
$5M
$5M
$7M
$0M
$4M
$4M
$7M
$6M
$8M

Ryerson Holding Corporation · RYZ

$50M
$107M
$164M
$196M
$55M
$-27M
$48M
$38M
$35M
$26M
$-7M
$10M
$-6M
$3M
$-5M
$2M
$-14M
$-24M
$5M

Tredegar Corporation · TG

$6M
$21M
$16M
$15M
$1M
$-4M
$-1M
$-19M
$-50M
$-29M
$3M
$9M
$-3M
$-7M
$1M
$2M
$7M
$14M
$5M

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. · WOR

$141M
$113M
$59M
$86M
$65M
$20M
$30M
$50M
$27M
$18M
$22M
$-32M
$24M
$28M
$39M
$4M
$35M
$27M
$45M
$48M

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation · AP

200%
-67%
0.0%
-300%
200%
-200%
-333%
-2,000%
-100%

ATI Inc. · ATI

16%
38%
47%
-75%
-1.2%
-7.5%
51%
49%
21%
31%
-29%
20%

Carpenter Technology Corporation · CRS

1,167%
617%
-68%
147%
93%
95%
1,483%
19%
45%
25%
47%

Commercial Metals Company · CMC

90%
12%
-53%
-25%
-36%
-33%
-52%
-49%
-43%
-200%
-71%
-30%
46%
272%
108%

ESAB Corporation · ESAB

-26%
-1.6%
19%
5.2%
0.0%
85%
25%
16%
23%
-15%
-1.4%
-12%
-29%

Insteel Industries Inc. · IIIN

117%
-4.0%
-87%
-72%
-96%
40%
-55%
0.0%
43%
114%
200%
700%
-50%

Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. · MEC

100%
-25%
-67%
-86%
0.0%
0.0%
100%
200%
700%
-100%
-125%
-200%
-125%

Mueller Industries, Inc. · MLI

87%
-9.3%
10%
-16%
15%
-15%
-6.9%
-4.4%
18%
12%
52%
22%
11%
52%

Proto Labs, Inc. · PRLB

-77%
-20%
-1,058%
-40%
-100%
100%
67%
-13%
-100%
-20%
-20%
0.0%
100%

Ryerson Holding Corporation · RYZ

73%
10%
-125%
-71%
-81%
-36%
-115%
-74%
-117%
-88%
-80%
-900%

Tredegar Corporation · TG

-29%
-83%
-119%
-106%
-227%
-5,100%
-67%
-78%
400%

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. · WOR

-54%
-82%
-49%
-42%
-58%
-10%
-27%
-164%
-11%
56%
77%
46%
-3.6%
15%
1,100%
08 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Xinxu Copper Industry Technology Limited has the highest ROCE among the 14 Metal Fabrication companies compared here, at 18.1%. Nintech Mould Factory Inc. is next at 14%. Worthington Enterprises, Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +3.6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 14 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Xinxu Copper Industry Technology Limited leads ROCE at 18.1%, 4.1 percentage points above Nintech Mould Factory Inc.. Worthington Enterprises, Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +3.6 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderXinxu Copper Industry Technology Limited · 18.1%
Gap29.3% versus #2 · Nintech Mould Factory Inc.
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage14/14 companies · 225 observations

Investor read: Xinxu Copper Industry Technology Limited sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
Return on capital · company comparison
14/14 level · 14/14 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Mueller Industries, Inc. MLI9.3%−1.4 ppJun 2026
Carpenter Technology Corporation CRS6.5%+1.3 ppJun 2026
ATI Inc. ATI4.0%+0.3 ppMar 2026
Commercial Metals Company CMC3.2%+1.2 ppJun 2026
Insteel Industries Inc. IIIN3.0%−2.1 ppJun 2026
Tredegar Corporation TG2.3%+1.3 ppMar 2026
ESAB Corporation ESAB2.1%−1.2 ppJun 2026
Proto Labs, Inc. PRLB1.6%+0.9 ppJun 2026
Worthington Enterprises, Inc. WOR1.5%+3.6 ppJun 2026
Ryerson Holding Corporation RYZ1.5%+1.2 ppJun 2026
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation AP-0.7%−0.4 ppMar 2026
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. MEC-1.8%−2.2 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation · AP

-1.4%
-0.8%
-0.7%
-0.1%
-0.6%
-0.5%
-0.1%
0.8%
0.5%
-11%
0.0%
0.3%
-0.5%
-0.5%
-0.3%
-1.7%
-0.8%
-1.8%
-0.7%

ATI Inc. · ATI

0.8%
2.0%
-0.3%
3.3%
4.0%
3.3%
3.5%
3.4%
3.1%
4.0%
3.5%
5.2%
3.7%
4.2%
4.0%
4.2%
4.0%

Carpenter Technology Corporation · CRS

-0.7%
-1.2%
0.0%
0.9%
0.3%
0.9%
1.5%
2.4%
2.7%
2.7%
2.9%
4.0%
4.1%
4.3%
4.9%
5.2%
5.2%
5.2%
6.1%
6.5%

Commercial Metals Company · CMC

7.5%
6.6%
10%
8.3%
7.8%
4.9%
6.1%
4.7%
4.3%
2.3%
3.0%
2.6%
-3.8%
0.8%
2.0%
3.5%
3.1%
2.2%
3.2%

ESAB Corporation · ESAB

2.7%
5.3%
5.7%
2.6%
2.9%
3.5%
3.3%
3.3%
3.4%
3.6%
3.2%
3.4%
3.3%
3.1%
2.8%
2.1%

Insteel Industries Inc. · IIIN

11%
11%
16%
15%
8.6%
1.6%
3.2%
0.0%
2.1%
2.0%
1.2%
0.2%
3.6%
5.1%
4.9%
2.5%
1.8%
3.0%

Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. · MEC

0.3%
-5.8%
1.7%
2.7%
2.8%
0.9%
1.3%
1.1%
1.5%
1.4%
2.0%
1.9%
1.4%
5.7%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
-1.3%
-1.8%

Mueller Industries, Inc. · MLI

19%
14%
16%
18%
13%
12%
13%
11%
6.2%
8.0%
8.6%
8.0%
6.4%
7.8%
11%
9.2%
5.5%
10%
9.3%

Proto Labs, Inc. · PRLB

0.9%
1.7%
0.9%
0.6%
0.7%
0.2%
0.5%
0.7%
1.3%
1.2%
1.0%
0.8%
1.2%
-0.2%
0.7%
0.7%
1.3%
1.1%
1.4%
1.6%

Ryerson Holding Corporation · RYZ

13%
10%
16%
18%
5.0%
-1.6%
4.1%
3.2%
3.1%
2.4%
0.0%
1.2%
0.3%
0.1%
0.1%
0.3%
-0.1%
-1.9%
1.0%
1.5%

Tredegar Corporation · TG

2.1%
2.6%
4.7%
5.4%
0.8%
-1.3%
0.3%
-5.4%
-16%
-21%
2.0%
3.4%
-0.5%
2.2%
1.0%
1.3%
4.1%
4.4%
2.3%

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. · WOR

3.5%
1.4%
2.5%
2.5%
-0.3%
0.1%
0.5%
-0.3%
-0.5%
0.2%
-2.6%
-0.2%
0.2%
1.4%
-2.1%
0.6%
0.8%
2.0%
1.5%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation · AP

+0.8 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.9 pp
+1.1 pp
−10.5 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.5 pp
−1.0 pp
+10.5 pp
−0.3 pp
−2.0 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.3 pp
−0.4 pp

ATI Inc. · ATI

+2.5 pp
+2.0 pp
+3.6 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.9 pp
+0.7 pp
0.0 pp
+1.8 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.5 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.3 pp

Carpenter Technology Corporation · CRS

+1.0 pp
+2.1 pp
+1.5 pp
+1.5 pp
+2.4 pp
+1.8 pp
+1.4 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.4 pp
+1.6 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.9 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.3 pp

Commercial Metals Company · CMC

+0.3 pp
−1.7 pp
−4.0 pp
−3.6 pp
−3.5 pp
−2.6 pp
−3.1 pp
−2.1 pp
−8.1 pp
−1.5 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.9 pp
+6.9 pp
+1.4 pp
+1.2 pp

ESAB Corporation · ESAB

−0.1 pp
−1.8 pp
−2.4 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.6 pp
−1.2 pp

Insteel Industries Inc. · IIIN

−2.1 pp
−14.3 pp
−11.4 pp
−8.6 pp
+0.4 pp
−2.0 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.5 pp
+3.1 pp
+3.7 pp
+2.3 pp
−1.8 pp
−2.1 pp

Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. · MEC

+2.5 pp
+6.7 pp
−0.4 pp
−1.6 pp
−1.3 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.8 pp
−0.1 pp
+4.3 pp
−1.6 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.4 pp
−7.0 pp
−2.2 pp

Mueller Industries, Inc. · MLI

−5.3 pp
−1.8 pp
−4.8 pp
−2.4 pp
−5.6 pp
−4.2 pp
−2.9 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.2 pp
+2.1 pp
+1.2 pp
−0.9 pp
+2.2 pp
−1.4 pp

Proto Labs, Inc. · PRLB

−0.2 pp
−1.5 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
−1.4 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+1.3 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.9 pp

Ryerson Holding Corporation · RYZ

−7.7 pp
−11.9 pp
−11.7 pp
−15.0 pp
−1.9 pp
+4.0 pp
−4.1 pp
−2.0 pp
−2.8 pp
−2.3 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.4 pp
−2.0 pp
+0.9 pp
+1.2 pp

Tredegar Corporation · TG

−1.3 pp
−3.9 pp
−4.4 pp
−10.8 pp
−17.2 pp
−20.1 pp
+1.7 pp
+8.8 pp
+15.9 pp
+23.6 pp
−1.0 pp
−2.1 pp
+4.6 pp
+2.2 pp
+1.3 pp

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. · WOR

−3.8 pp
−1.3 pp
−2.0 pp
−2.8 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.1 pp
−3.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.6 pp
+3.6 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Tredegar Corporation has the lowest PEG among the 14 Metal Fabrication companies compared here, at 0.26×. Worthington Enterprises, Inc. is next at 0.37×. The same company also holds the lowest P/E, at 9.46×. 3 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Tredegar Corporation has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.26×, 29.7% below Worthington Enterprises, Inc.. Only 3 of 14 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderTredegar Corporation · 0.26×
Gap29.7% versus #2 · Worthington Enterprises, Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/14 companies · 19 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
Valuation · company comparison
3/14 level · 12/14 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
ATI Inc. ATI4.946.5Mar 2026
Proto Labs, Inc. PRLB1.665.2Jun 2026
ESAB Corporation ESAB1.328.9Jun 2026
Carpenter Technology Corporation CRS1.258.6Jun 2026
Insteel Industries Inc. IIIN1.016.4Jun 2026
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. MEC0.723.7Mar 2026
Worthington Enterprises, Inc. WOR0.418.1Jun 2026
Mueller Industries, Inc. MLI0.416.7Jun 2026
Commercial Metals Company CMC14.3Jun 2026
Ryerson Holding Corporation RYZ109.3Jun 2026
Tredegar Corporation TG9.5Mar 2026
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation AP9.9Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

ATI Inc. · ATI

0.9
1.2
0.7
3.6
4.9

Carpenter Technology Corporation · CRS

1.2

ESAB Corporation · ESAB

1.5
1.0
1.0
1.3

Insteel Industries Inc. · IIIN

1.0

Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. · MEC

0.7

Mueller Industries, Inc. · MLI

0.6
0.5
0.6
0.4

Proto Labs, Inc. · PRLB

1.6

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. · WOR

0.2
0.4

P/E · reported quarter history

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation · AP

47.0
13.9
49.0
104.5
9.9

ATI Inc. · ATI

12.1
13.7
15.4
13.4
15.8
12.9
11.3
19.0
20.9
25.5
21.8
18.5
30.1
26.8
41.0
46.5

Carpenter Technology Corporation · CRS

106.6
49.2
31.0
24.5
27.2
29.6
35.2
31.8
25.5
37.3
29.9
36.5
41.4
58.6

Commercial Metals Company · CMC

6.4
5.2
4.5
4.0
4.7
5.9
5.2
7.8
6.9
9.3
11.6
12.9
54.6
79.4
150.3
77.9
16.4
16.3
14.3

ESAB Corporation · ESAB

12.8
12.3
12.6
17.7
19.1
19.6
25.8
27.4
22.0
24.0
27.8
24.0
29.8
29.4
28.9

Insteel Industries Inc. · IIIN

11.4
9.6
6.9
5.6
4.2
6.9
11.9
33.3
30.8
29.8
31.2
27.8
22.7
23.6
18.3
13.4
15.1
16.4

Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. · MEC

55.3
46.5
13.9
17.6
19.5
28.1
38.0
34.1
32.0
35.7
12.7
12.4
18.8
23.7

Mueller Industries, Inc. · MLI

6.2
7.1
5.8
4.6
5.1
5.1
6.2
7.7
8.9
10.8
11.8
14.0
15.1
14.0
12.6
15.1
17.2
14.2
16.7

Proto Labs, Inc. · PRLB

58.9
42.4
42.0
54.4
42.9
59.0
46.4
32.2
31.2
59.2
58.4
66.7
82.0
57.5
53.8
65.2

Ryerson Holding Corporation · RYZ

5.1
3.5
3.2
1.6
1.9
3.0
5.1
13.8
10.9
8.5
13.0
10.8
19.1
109.3

Tredegar Corporation · TG

9.5
6.9
6.2
5.7
5.9
12.2
27.7
7.5
9.5

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. · WOR

3.6
4.4
9.3
5.1
8.0
8.9
6.7
8.0
7.4
11.4
25.9
60.3
49.3
35.6
30.7
30.9
25.9
24.9
18.1
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Metal Fabrication comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 14 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
11 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 14 Metal Fabrication companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Metal Fabrication company comparison FAQs

These 22 answers restate the Metal Fabrication comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 14 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Metal Fabrication sector outperforming S&P 500?

Metal Fabrication has outperformed S&P 500 by 27.3% over 52 weeks and 1.6% over 13 weeks. 6 of 12 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 5 of 12 beat the sector itself.

Which Metal Fabrication company is largest by revenue?

Commercial Metals Company leads with revenue of $8,850 million, based on 6 of 14 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Which Metal Fabrication company is growing fastest?

Tredegar Corporation has the fastest current revenue growth at 20.2%, across 6 of 14 comparable companies.

Which Metal Fabrication company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Carpenter Technology Corporation ranks first at 63.8/100 with 57.8% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Metal Fabrication company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Tredegar Corporation has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.26, among 3 of 14 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Metal Fabrication comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Which Metal Fabrication company is the biggest?

Commercial Metals Company is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $8,850 million, ahead of ATI Inc. at $4,595 million. That covers 6 of 14 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.

Which Metal Fabrication company has the best profit margins?

Mueller Industries, Inc. has the highest operating margin at 26.2%, from 12 of 14 comparable companies. Worthington Enterprises, Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +15.8 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Metal Fabrication company makes the most profit?

Commercial Metals Company earns the most, at $595 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 6 of 14 comparable companies. Commercial Metals Company has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Metal Fabrication company earns the highest return on capital?

Xinxu Copper Industry Technology Limited leads on return on capital employed at 18.1%, across 14 of 14 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Metal Fabrication stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Tredegar Corporation screens cheapest at 0.26×. Only 3 of 14 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Metal Fabrication sector beating the market?

Metal Fabrication has outperformed S&P 500 by 27.3% over the last 52 weeks and 1.6% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 6 of 12 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Metal Fabrication stock has the strongest price momentum?

ATI Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Metal Fabrication company scores highest for research priority?

Carpenter Technology Corporation scores 63.8 out of 100 with 57.8% evidence confidence, from 21.7 points on growth and earnings, 13.9 on capital efficiency, 9 on valuation and 19.2 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Metal Fabrication companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 14 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Metal Fabrication sector?

The 14 Metal Fabrication companies on this page carry $93,148 million of combined market value. Carpenter Technology Corporation is the largest at $28,327 million, about 30% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.

What is the Metal Fabrication sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 14 Metal Fabrication companies on this page is 23.7×, measured on the 12 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.

How is the Metal Fabrication sector performing?

6 of the 12 covered Metal Fabrication companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 27.3% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.

How many Metal Fabrication stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 14 listed Metal Fabrication companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI