Skip to content
Markets
This is research, not advice. We’re not SEBI-registered.
Industry · 14 companies

Metal Fabrication Stocks in the US

The 14 Metal Fabrication companies we score in the US are ATI Inc. ($24.3B, the largest), Carpenter Technology Corporation, Mueller Industries, Inc. and 11 more. 3 of the 14 companies we score beat S&P 500 on share price over recent months (2 have no relative-strength reading yet). Prices are as of 4 Nov 2026.

Metal Fabrication: Commercial Metals Company owns the largest revenue base; Ryerson Holding Corporation has the fastest current growth.

14Companies every listed company in this industry
$71.0BCombined market value all of them together
10/10Revenue growing revenue over the last 12 months up on a year earlier
3/14Beating S&P 500 share price doing better than the index (relative strength) (2 have no reading yet)
3 of 14 beat the S&P 500 on share price over recent months

The main question: the biggest companies are not always the ones changing the most.

Start with size. Then the direction of earnings. Then the quality of the business. A share price that leads means more once those three agree.

Which are the biggest Metal Fabrication stocks in the US?

The largest Metal Fabrication stocks in the US by market value are ATI Inc. ($24.3B), Carpenter Technology Corporation ($14.5B) and Mueller Industries, Inc. ($12.0B), at prices of 4 Nov 2026.

The other 4 Metal Fabrication companies are in the full list below.

Share price | market value | P/E, biggest first. Prices and market values as of 4 Nov 2026; ratios as in the score list below.

Which are the Metal Fabrication stocks, ranked?

Ranked by the 4-Factor Sector Score (growth & earnings 35, capital efficiency 25, valuation 20, relative strength 20). Prices as of 4 Nov 2026.

  1. 1Worthington Enterprises, Inc.WOR · $3.2B62.8of 100mixed, leaning good · strongest on PEG and relative strength versus sector
  2. 2Commercial Metals CompanyCMC · $7.3B57.3of 100mixed, leaning good · strongest on profit growth and revenue growth
  3. 3Ryerson Holding CorporationRYZ · $1.6B57.2of 100provisional · strongest on relative strength versus sector and revenue growth
  4. 4Carpenter Technology CorporationCRS · $14.5B56.2of 100mixed, leaning good · strongest on ROCE and ROCE improvement
  5. 5Mueller Industries, Inc.MLI · $12.0B55.2of 100mixed, leaning good · strongest on ROCE and revenue growth
  6. 6Tredegar CorporationTG · $249M52.0of 100provisional · strongest on ROCE improvement and revenue growth
  7. 7ATI Inc.ATI · $24.3B50.3of 100mixed, leaning good · strongest on relative strength versus sector and ROCE
  8. 8Proto Labs, Inc.PRLB · $1.6B49.2of 100mixed, leaning weak · strongest on profit growth and margin improvement
  9. 9Insteel Industries Inc.IIIN · $560M45.5of 100provisional · strongest on 13-week relative-strength change and profitable quarters
  10. 10ESAB CorporationESAB · $4.9B42.3of 100provisional · strongest on 13-week relative-strength change and profitable quarters

Which Metal Fabrication companies are listed in the US?

All 14 listed US Metal Fabrication companies are named here, largest first. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies and carries its own as-of date. One large company cannot set the reading.

  1. ATI Inc.$24.3B
  2. Carpenter Technology Corporation$14.5B
  3. Mueller Industries, Inc.$12.0B
  4. Commercial Metals Company$7.3B
  5. ESAB Corporation$4.9B
  6. Worthington Enterprises, Inc.$3.2B
  7. Ryerson Holding Corporation$1.6B
  8. Proto Labs, Inc.$1.6B
  9. Insteel Industries Inc.$560M
  10. Mayville Engineering Company, Inc.$408M
  11. Tredegar Corporation$249M
  12. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation$143M
  13. Xinxu Copper Industry Technology Limited$127M
  14. Nintech Mould Factory Inc.$123M

How many Metal Fabrication companies are listed in the US?

12 Metal Fabrication companies in the Metal Fabrication industry group (every listed company) have a page on Sector Alpha, by market value as of 4 November 2026, and all 12 are listed below, largest first. The largest is ATI Inc. ($24.3 billion) and the smallest with a market value is Tredegar Corporation.

Every Metal Fabrication company with a page, largest first
CompanyMarket value
1. ATI Inc. ATI$24.3 billion
2. Carpenter Technology Corporation CRS$14.5 billion
3. Mueller Industries, Inc. MLI$12 billion
4. Commercial Metals Company CMC$7.3 billion
5. ESAB Corporation ESAB$4.9 billion
6. GPGI, Inc. GPGI$3.7 billion
7. Worthington Enterprises, Inc. WOR$3.2 billion
8. Ryerson Holding Corporation RYZ$1.6 billion
9. Proto Labs, Inc. PRLB$1.6 billion
10. Insteel Industries Inc. IIIN$560 million
11. Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. MEC$408 million
12. Tredegar Corporation TG$249 million

Download all 12 Metal Fabrication companies (CSV)

How has Metal Fabrication moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the last two years (104 weeks) this industry is 9% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 38% on average over the last four reported quarters.

Quiet · 1 year −1.6% ~ Moving with the index

2 of the 12 companies with a long enough price record ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months. 1 is 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more.

Not ahead of S&P 500 on the three-month view this week; 3 of the 12 companies in the industry index above their 200-day average (no change from four weeks earlier); 2 of those 12 ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months (no change from four weeks earlier); earnings rising at 7 of the 12 that report earnings.

Not ahead of S&P 500, not building participation, not giving any back. Earnings mixed, 7 of 12 members have higher trailing twelve-month earnings than a year ago.

1Y

Metal Fabrication against S&P 500

Both lines start at 200 in the first week shown

  • Metal Fabrication 222
  • S&P 500 228
Metal Fabrication against S&P 500
Week endingMetal FabricationS&P 500
14 Nov 2025200200
21 Nov 2025195196
28 Nov 2025203203
5 Dec 2025205204
12 Dec 2025214203
19 Dec 2025210203
26 Dec 2025215205
2 Jan 2026213203
9 Jan 2026222207
16 Jan 2026231206
23 Jan 2026231205
30 Jan 2026229206
6 Feb 2026249206
13 Feb 2026249203
20 Feb 2026249205
27 Feb 2026244204
6 Mar 2026226200
13 Mar 2026205197
20 Mar 2026202193
27 Mar 2026206189
3 Apr 2026216195
10 Apr 2026231202
17 Apr 2026231211
24 Apr 2026232213
1 May 2026234215
8 May 2026241220
15 May 2026226220
22 May 2026231222
29 May 2026239225
5 Jun 2026242220
12 Jun 2026260221
19 Jun 2026264222
26 Jun 2026263217
3 Jul 2026249222
10 Jul 2026245225
17 Jul 2026250221
24 Jul 2026256220
31 Jul 2026244222
7 Aug 2026265230
14 Aug 2026257231
21 Aug 2026240228
28 Aug 2026237229
4 Sep 2026242229
11 Sep 2026231227
18 Sep 2026222227
25 Sep 2026226230
2 Oct 2026228229
9 Oct 2026225232
16 Oct 2026224227
23 Oct 2026209226
30 Oct 2026213225
6 Nov 2026222228

3Y

Metal Fabrication against S&P 500

Both lines start at 200 in the first week shown, every 2nd week shown

  • Metal Fabrication 451
  • S&P 500 340
Metal Fabrication against S&P 500
Week endingMetal FabricationS&P 500
17 Nov 2023200200
24 Nov 2023201202
8 Dec 2023194204
22 Dec 2023213210
5 Jan 2024203208
19 Jan 2024203214
2 Feb 2024204219
16 Feb 2024214222
1 Mar 2024217228
15 Mar 2024223226
29 Mar 2024240232
12 Apr 2024232227
26 Apr 2024237226
10 May 2024253231
24 May 2024249235
7 Jun 2024238237
21 Jun 2024233242
5 Jul 2024234246
19 Jul 2024255244
2 Aug 2024255236
16 Aug 2024274246
30 Aug 2024281250
13 Sep 2024275249
27 Sep 2024288254
11 Oct 2024286257
25 Oct 2024287257
8 Nov 2024327265
22 Nov 2024333264
6 Dec 2024330270
20 Dec 2024311262
3 Jan 2025311263
17 Jan 2025320265
31 Jan 2025320267
14 Feb 2025332271
28 Feb 2025317264
14 Mar 2025294250
28 Mar 2025298247
11 Apr 2025283237
25 Apr 2025300244
9 May 2025335250
23 May 2025341257
6 Jun 2025361266
20 Jun 2025352264
4 Jul 2025383277
18 Jul 2025379278
1 Aug 2025366276
15 Aug 2025375285
29 Aug 2025388286
12 Sep 2025386292
26 Sep 2025388294
10 Oct 2025377290
24 Oct 2025409300
7 Nov 2025400298
21 Nov 2025395292
5 Dec 2025416304
19 Dec 2025427302
2 Jan 2026432303
16 Jan 2026468307
30 Jan 2026466307
13 Feb 2026506302
27 Feb 2026496304
13 Mar 2026416294
27 Mar 2026419281
10 Apr 2026470301
24 Apr 2026472317
8 May 2026489327
22 May 2026469331
5 Jun 2026491327
19 Jun 2026536331
3 Jul 2026506330
17 Jul 2026508330
31 Jul 2026496331
14 Aug 2026522344
28 Aug 2026481341
11 Sep 2026469339
25 Sep 2026459342
9 Oct 2026457345
23 Oct 2026424337
6 Nov 2026451340

5Y

Metal Fabrication against S&P 500

Both lines start at 200 in the first week shown, every 4th week shown

  • Metal Fabrication 655
  • S&P 500 327
Metal Fabrication against S&P 500
Week endingMetal FabricationS&P 500
19 Nov 2021200200
10 Dec 2021192201
7 Jan 2022200199
4 Feb 2022198191
4 Mar 2022215184
1 Apr 2022225193
29 Apr 2022213176
27 May 2022217177
24 Jun 2022195166
22 Jul 2022192169
19 Aug 2022225180
16 Sep 2022200164
14 Oct 2022190153
11 Nov 2022207170
9 Dec 2022206168
6 Jan 2023217166
3 Feb 2023263176
3 Mar 2023272172
31 Mar 2023263175
28 Apr 2023259177
26 May 2023254179
23 Jun 2023274185
21 Jul 2023297193
18 Aug 2023283186
15 Sep 2023282189
13 Oct 2023262184
10 Nov 2023282188
8 Dec 2023281196
5 Jan 2024295200
2 Feb 2024297211
1 Mar 2024315219
29 Mar 2024349223
26 Apr 2024345217
24 May 2024362226
21 Jun 2024338232
19 Jul 2024371234
16 Aug 2024398236
13 Sep 2024400240
11 Oct 2024416247
8 Nov 2024476255
6 Dec 2024480259
3 Jan 2025452252
31 Jan 2025465257
28 Feb 2025461253
28 Mar 2025433237
25 Apr 2025436235
23 May 2025496247
20 Jun 2025512253
18 Jul 2025551268
15 Aug 2025545274
12 Sep 2025561280
10 Oct 2025548279
7 Nov 2025581286
5 Dec 2025605292
2 Jan 2026628291
30 Jan 2026677295
27 Feb 2026721293
27 Mar 2026609270
24 Apr 2026686305
22 May 2026681318
19 Jun 2026778319
17 Jul 2026739317
14 Aug 2026758331
11 Sep 2026681326
9 Oct 2026664332
6 Nov 2026655327

Earnings, each company rebased to 100, the sector takes the median

Latest quarter July to September 2026: 69.0, from 4 companies

Earnings, each company rebased to 100, the sector takes the median
QuarterMedian earnings index
Jan 2022100.0 (4 companies)
Apr 2022100.0 (8 companies)
Jul 202295.1 (10 companies)
Oct 2022101.0 (8 companies)
Jan 202384.8 (7 companies)
Apr 202374.8 (7 companies)
Jul 202348.4 (9 companies)
Oct 202374.1 (7 companies)
Jan 202469.4 (8 companies)
Apr 202465.2 (8 companies)
Jul 202460.7 (8 companies)
Oct 202418.2 (9 companies)
Jan 202518.7 (8 companies)
Apr 202529.6 (9 companies)
Jul 202539.0 (9 companies)
Oct 202559.6 (10 companies)
Jan 202646.7 (8 companies)
Apr 202660.1 (9 companies)
Jul 202669.0 (4 companies)

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the gap between them tells the story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of 12 of its 14 companies (the 2 with too short a price record are ranked in the scorecard but cannot sit in this line). The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member set to 100 at the start and the industry taking the middle value, so a price line pulling away from flat bars means the market is paying more for the same earnings. A bar turns grey when that figure is lower than the quarter before. The rules are fixed and the same everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover or tap any point to read both values and the gap.

Is Metal Fabrication outperforming S&P 500?

Metal Fabrication has done better than the S&P 500 by 10.1% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 16.4%. Ryerson Holding Corporation is the strongest against the sector itself at +24.5%.

−16.4%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+10.1%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
3 of 14Stocks leading S&P 500
3 of 14Stocks leading the sector

What is the bottom line on Metal Fabrication?

Metal Fabrication has done better than the S&P 500 by 10.1% over 52 weeks, but is 16.4% behind over the last 13 weeks. 3 of 14 companies we track are beating the S&P 500 on relative strength (how a share price has done against the index over recent months) (2 have no relative-strength reading yet), and 3 of the 12 with a long enough price history are ahead of the industry itself.

How does each Metal Fabrication stock score?

A score that ranks each company against the others in its industry. The four parts shown always add up to the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or old evidence affects only its own part, never as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35% Capital efficiency · 25% Valuation · 20% Relative strength · 20%

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 81.1% evidence confidence.

  1. 1Worthington Enterprises, Inc.WOR · breaking out · mixed, leaning good · 81% evidence62.8out of 100GrowthCapitalValuationRelative
    How the score adds upGrowth & earnings 20.7/35 · Revenue 18.3% · PAT 53.8% · OPM change −0.6 pp · 83% evidenceCapital efficiency 8.0/25 · ROCE 5.6% · OPM 4% · 76% evidenceValuation 14.9/20 · P/E 17.2× · PEG 0.31 · 65% evidenceRelative strength 19.2/20 · RS sector 18.4% · RS bench 8.2% · 1Y 18.4% · 100% evidence · 6 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 20.7 + 8 + 14.9 + 19.2 = 62.8 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.
  2. 2Commercial Metals CompanyCMC · quiet · mixed, leaning good · 71% evidence57.3out of 100GrowthCapitalValuationRelative
    How the score adds upGrowth & earnings 22.4/35 · Revenue 20.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change −1.3 pp · 83% evidenceCapital efficiency 12.3/25 · ROCE 10.1% · OPM 8.8% · 76% evidenceValuation 10.7/20 · P/E 11.4× · PEG — · 15% evidenceRelative strength 11.9/20 · RS sector −0.3% · RS bench −9.3% · 1Y 13.1% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 22.4 + 12.3 + 10.7 + 11.9 = 57.3 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.
  3. 3Ryerson Holding CorporationRYZ · turning · provisional · 51% evidence57.2out of 100GrowthCapitalValuationRelative
    How the score adds upGrowth & earnings 19.8/35 · Revenue 31.6% · PAT — · OPM change 0.8 pp · 40% evidenceCapital efficiency 6.3/25 · ROCE 1.1% · OPM 1.9% · 57% evidenceValuation 11.5/20 · P/E −39.1× · PEG — · 15% evidenceRelative strength 19.6/20 · RS sector 24.5% · RS bench 13.3% · 1Y 54.8% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 19.8 + 6.3 + 11.5 + 19.6 = 57.2 · What this means: Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose.
  4. 4Carpenter Technology CorporationCRS · quiet · mixed, leaning good · 81% evidence56.2out of 100GrowthCapitalValuationRelative
    How the score adds upGrowth & earnings 23.8/35 · Revenue 10.2% · PAT 37.4% · OPM change 4 pp · 83% evidenceCapital efficiency 19.8/25 · ROCE 22.6% · OPM 24.7% · 76% evidenceValuation 12.6/20 · P/E 33.8× · PEG 0.87 · 65% evidenceRelative strength 0.0/20 · RS sector −27% · RS bench −34% · 1Y −10.9% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 23.8 + 19.8 + 12.6 + 0 = 56.2 · What this means: Earnings are strong; relative strength in its sector is −27% and the one-year return is −10.9%.
  5. 5Mueller Industries, Inc.MLI · quiet · mixed, leaning good · 81% evidence55.2out of 100GrowthCapitalValuationRelative
    How the score adds upGrowth & earnings 15.8/35 · Revenue 20.8% · PAT 15.3% · OPM change −4.7 pp · 83% evidenceCapital efficiency 21.5/25 · ROCE 28.3% · OPM 19.5% · 76% evidenceValuation 12.5/20 · P/E 15.5× · PEG 0.94 · 65% evidenceRelative strength 5.4/20 · RS sector −6.8% · RS bench −15.2% · 1Y 3.1% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 15.8 + 21.5 + 12.5 + 5.4 = 55.2 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.
  6. 6Tredegar CorporationTG · quiet · provisional · 51% evidence52.0out of 100GrowthCapitalValuationRelative
    How the score adds upGrowth & earnings 21.6/35 · Revenue 21.4% · PAT — · OPM change 1.4 pp · 40% evidenceCapital efficiency 11.6/25 · ROCE 14.1% · OPM 4% · 57% evidenceValuation 11.0/20 · P/E 8.2× · PEG — · 15% evidenceRelative strength 7.8/20 · RS sector −6.6% · RS bench −15% · 1Y 6% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 21.6 + 11.6 + 11 + 7.8 = 52 · What this means: Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose.
  7. 7ATI Inc.ATI · quiet · mixed, leaning good · 66% evidence50.3out of 100GrowthCapitalValuationRelative
    How the score adds upGrowth & earnings 17.5/35 · Revenue 4.6% · PAT 13.9% · OPM change 3.8 pp · 53% evidenceCapital efficiency 16.0/25 · ROCE 17.5% · OPM 18.2% · 57% evidenceValuation 3.8/20 · P/E 56.6× · PEG 3.15 · 65% evidenceRelative strength 13.0/20 · RS sector 15.6% · RS bench 4.8% · 1Y 83.4% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 17.5 + 16 + 3.8 + 13 = 50.3 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.
  8. 8Proto Labs, Inc.PRLB · fading · mixed, leaning weak · 66% evidence49.2out of 100GrowthCapitalValuationRelative
    How the score adds upGrowth & earnings 22.3/35 · Revenue 9.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5.1 pp · 53% evidenceCapital efficiency 9.9/25 · ROCE 5.7% · OPM 8.9% · 57% evidenceValuation 7.8/20 · P/E 63.6× · PEG 1.59 · 65% evidenceRelative strength 9.2/20 · RS sector −0.1% · RS bench −9% · 1Y 35.7% · 100% evidence · 8 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 22.3 + 9.9 + 7.8 + 9.2 = 49.2 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.
  9. 9Insteel Industries Inc.IIIN · quiet · provisional · 58% evidence45.5out of 100GrowthCapitalValuationRelative
    How the score adds upGrowth & earnings 14.2/35 · Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change −0.7 pp · 45% evidenceCapital efficiency 11.3/25 · ROCE 9.5% · OPM 5.1% · 76% evidenceValuation 9.6/20 · P/E 19.4× · PEG — · 15% evidenceRelative strength 10.4/20 · RS sector −4.5% · RS bench −13% · 1Y −7.7% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 14.2 + 11.3 + 9.6 + 10.4 = 45.5 · What this means: Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose.
  10. 10ESAB CorporationESAB · basing · provisional · 53% evidence42.3out of 100GrowthCapitalValuationRelative
    How the score adds upGrowth & earnings 14.6/35 · Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change −3.4 pp · 32% evidenceCapital efficiency 11.8/25 · ROCE 7.4% · OPM 12% · 76% evidenceValuation 9.3/20 · P/E 33.6× · PEG — · 15% evidenceRelative strength 6.6/20 · RS sector −17.4% · RS bench −24.9% · 1Y −31.5% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 14.6 + 11.8 + 9.3 + 6.6 = 42.3 · What this means: Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose.
  11. 11Ampco-Pittsburgh CorporationAP · fading · provisional · 51% evidence38.5out of 100GrowthCapitalValuationRelative
  12. 12Mayville Engineering Company, Inc.MEC · basing · provisional · 51% evidence33.1out of 100GrowthCapitalValuationRelative

Ranked last: too little evidence (2 companies)

Under 60% of the evidence behind these scores is available, so they rank after every company above, whatever the score.

  1. 13Xinxu Copper Industry Technology LimitedXXC · provisional · 11% evidence54.3out of 100GrowthCapitalValuationRelative
  2. 14Nintech Mould Factory Inc.NTMJ · provisional · 11% evidence50.7out of 100GrowthCapitalValuationRelative
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

How have Metal Fabrication share prices moved?

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation has the strongest one-year price move in Metal Fabrication at +273.5%. Ryerson Holding Corporation leads on relative strength against the S&P 500, at +13.3%. 3 of 14 companies we track are ahead of the index on that measure (2 have no relative-strength reading yet). Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 4 November 2026.

Price and relative strength

Price · same starting point: Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts: the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

RS vs S&P 500: How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.

RS vs sector: The same measure taken against Metal Fabrication itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.

1Y

Price of the 5 strongest one-year movers, each started at 100

52 weekly closes

  • Ampco-Pittsburgh 281
  • ATI Inc. 180
  • Ryerson Holding 157
  • Proto Labs, Inc. 137
  • Worthington 119
  • S&P 500 114
Price of the 5 strongest one-year movers, each started at 100
Week endingAmpco-PittsburghATI Inc.Ryerson HoldingProto Labs, Inc.WorthingtonS&P 500
14 Nov 2025100100100100100100
21 Nov 2025969710710110098
28 Nov 2025105101114105101102
5 Dec 2025118101119107101102
12 Dec 2025148110125108107102
19 Dec 202516611412710896101
26 Dec 202518911813010997103
2 Jan 202620212012810695102
9 Jan 202621012314011399103
16 Jan 202623212514311398103
23 Jan 202624312414511197103
30 Jan 2026226121140109102103
6 Feb 2026276134148139108103
13 Feb 2026317145134139108102
20 Feb 2026360160139135105103
27 Feb 2026370165130128103102
6 Mar 202633515112411894100
13 Mar 20263351431041128799
20 Mar 2026279143991158797
27 Mar 20262791411051169394
3 Apr 20262921481101199698
10 Apr 2026331163122127101101
17 Apr 2026385166123133101106
24 Apr 2026421155131133101106
1 May 2026426156138134100107
8 May 2026496159135143100110
15 May 202644115512614998110
22 May 2026413163132147101111
29 May 2026460176142156104113
5 Jun 2026397179135150105110
12 Jun 2026481200151163110110
19 Jun 2026439203137167111111
26 Jun 2026380199137166103109
3 Jul 2026299189119158100111
10 Jul 2026319188131153100112
17 Jul 2026311187147160102111
24 Jul 2026333199153161103110
31 Jul 2026327189138155103111
7 Aug 2026387229139183107115
14 Aug 2026381230143189108116
21 Aug 2026358208125164104114
28 Aug 2026360212126164105115
4 Sep 2026353212130168115115
11 Sep 2026330200125169104114
18 Sep 2026339193120181105113
25 Sep 2026351187118199114115
2 Oct 2026394194127203111115
9 Oct 2026376193130194115116
16 Oct 2026336187136177118114
23 Oct 2026319158139177117113
30 Oct 2026313167154142115113
6 Nov 2026281180157137119114

3Y

Price of the 5 strongest one-year movers, each started at 100

156 weekly closes, every 2nd shown

  • Ampco-Pittsburgh 222
  • ATI Inc. 403
  • Ryerson Holding 133
  • Proto Labs, Inc. 187
  • Worthington 99
  • S&P 500 170
Price of the 5 strongest one-year movers, each started at 100
Week endingAmpco-PittsburghATI Inc.Ryerson HoldingProto Labs, Inc.WorthingtonS&P 500
17 Nov 2023–100–100100100
24 Nov 2023–99–104101101
8 Dec 2023–90–10578102
22 Dec 2023–103–11089105
5 Jan 2024–97–10284104
19 Jan 2024–95–10184107
2 Feb 2024–88–10389110
16 Feb 2024–103–10294111
1 Mar 2024–111–10096114
15 Mar 2024–111–9696113
29 Mar 2024–115–10095116
12 Apr 2024–116–9189113
26 Apr 2024–117–8889113
10 May 2024–137–8990116
24 May 2024–136–8787117
7 Jun 2024–131–9081119
21 Jun 2024–122–8477121
5 Jul 2024–127–8667123
19 Jul 2024–132–9274122
2 Aug 2024–140–8070118
16 Aug 2024–144–8367123
30 Aug 2024–144–8670125
13 Sep 2024–139–8369125
27 Sep 2024–149–8362127
11 Oct 2024–143–8061129
25 Oct 2024–138–7559129
8 Nov 2024–131–10964133
22 Nov 2024–134–11661132
6 Dec 2024–130–12062135
20 Dec 2024–123–11462131
3 Jan 2025–126–11160131
17 Jan 2025–129–10864133
31 Jan 2025–129–11764134
14 Feb 2025–138–12467135
28 Feb 2025–131–11264132
14 Mar 2025–116–10362125
28 Mar 2025–115–10077123
11 Apr 2025–105–9772118
25 Apr 2025–120–9976122
9 May 2025–161–11488125
23 May 2025–170–10388129
6 Jun 2025–189–10892133
20 Jun 2025–186–10789132
4 Jul 2025–196–11699139
18 Jul 20251042109611095139
1 Aug 2025991738712194138
15 Aug 2025941639213599143
29 Aug 20258717596140100143
12 Sep 2025851729413997146
26 Sep 2025781879614183147
10 Oct 2025701809213584145
24 Oct 2025732019915389150
7 Nov 2025592208613883149
21 Nov 2025762179113783146
5 Dec 20259322610114684152
19 Dec 202513125510714680151
2 Jan 202615926910814479152
16 Jan 202618328012115481153
30 Jan 202617927111914884154
13 Feb 202625032411419090151
27 Feb 202629236911017485152
13 Mar 20262643208815372147
27 Mar 20262203169015777141
10 Apr 202626136510417284151
24 Apr 202633234811118184158
8 May 202639135711519483164
22 May 202632636611220084165
5 Jun 202631340011420487164
19 Jun 202634645411722792166
3 Jul 202623642410121483165
17 Jul 202624641912521885165
31 Jul 202625842211721185166
14 Aug 202630051512225889172
28 Aug 202628447510722487171
11 Sep 202626044810623087170
25 Sep 202627741810027095171
9 Oct 202629743211026395173
23 Oct 202625235311824097169
6 Nov 202622240313318799170

5Y

Price of the 5 strongest one-year movers, each started at 100

260 weekly closes, every 4th shown

  • Ampco-Pittsburgh 222
  • Ryerson Holding 133
  • Proto Labs, Inc. 126
  • Worthington 120
  • S&P 500 164
Price of the 5 strongest one-year movers, each started at 100
Week endingAmpco-PittsburghRyerson HoldingProto Labs, Inc.WorthingtonS&P 500
19 Nov 2021––100100100
10 Dec 2021––9495100
7 Jan 2022––9910899
4 Feb 2022––949796
4 Mar 2022––9711192
1 Apr 2022––1019597
29 Apr 2022––818888
27 May 2022––928789
24 Jun 2022––928683
22 Jul 2022––918484
19 Aug 2022––8410190
16 Sep 2022––719582
14 Oct 2022––677976
11 Nov 2022––4510285
9 Dec 2022––479684
6 Jan 2023––519683
3 Feb 2023––6311488
3 Mar 2023––6611686
31 Mar 2023––6312087
28 Apr 2023––5411089
26 May 2023––6010890
23 Jun 2023––6311292
21 Jul 2023––6413296
18 Aug 2023––5413393
15 Sep 2023––5112795
13 Oct 2023––4811492
10 Nov 2023––6511794
8 Dec 2023––719598
5 Jan 2024––69102100
2 Feb 2024––70109105
1 Mar 2024––67117109
29 Mar 2024––68115112
26 Apr 2024––59108108
24 May 2024––58106113
21 Jun 2024––5793116
19 Jul 2024––6290117
16 Aug 2024––5682118
13 Sep 2024––5684120
11 Oct 2024––5475124
8 Nov 2024––7479128
6 Dec 2024––8176130
3 Jan 2025––7574126
31 Jan 2025––7978128
28 Feb 2025––7578127
28 Mar 2025––6893119
25 Apr 2025––6792117
23 May 2025––70107124
20 Jun 2025––72108127
18 Jul 20251049674115134
15 Aug 2025949291120137
12 Sep 2025859493118140
10 Oct 2025709291102139
7 Nov 2025598693101143
5 Dec 20259310198102146
2 Jan 20261591089796146
30 Jan 2026179119100103148
27 Feb 2026292110117104146
27 Mar 20262209010694135
24 Apr 2026332111122102152
22 May 2026326112135102159
19 Jun 2026346117153112159
17 Jul 2026246125147103159
14 Aug 2026300122174109166
11 Sep 2026260106155105163
9 Oct 2026297110177116166
6 Nov 2026222133126120164
Left off this window so the other lines stay readable: ATI Inc. (it reached 1,425).

The companies with the strongest one-year price moves are drawn. The S&P 500 line is dashed.

Biggest one-year moves

  1. 1Ampco-Pittsburgh CorporationAP · $143M+273.5%1 year
  2. 2ATI Inc.ATI · $24.3B+83.4%1 year
  3. 3Ryerson Holding CorporationRYZ · $1.6B+54.8%1 year
  4. 4Proto Labs, Inc.PRLB · $1.6B+35.7%1 year
  5. 5Worthington Enterprises, Inc.WOR · $3.2B+18.4%1 year

Strongest against S&P 500

  1. 1Ryerson Holding CorporationRYZ · $1.6B+13.3%vs S&P 500
  2. 2Worthington Enterprises, Inc.WOR · $3.2B+8.2%vs S&P 500
  3. 3ATI Inc.ATI · $24.3B+4.8%vs S&P 500
  4. 4Proto Labs, Inc.PRLB · $1.6B−9.0%vs S&P 500
  5. 5Commercial Metals CompanyCMC · $7.3B−9.3%vs S&P 500

Strongest against the sector itself

  1. 1Ryerson Holding CorporationRYZ · $1.6B+24.5%vs sector
  2. 2Worthington Enterprises, Inc.WOR · $3.2B+18.4%vs sector
  3. 3ATI Inc.ATI · $24.3B+15.6%vs sector
  4. 4Proto Labs, Inc.PRLB · $1.6B−0.1%vs sector
  5. 5Commercial Metals CompanyCMC · $7.3B−0.3%vs sector

Which Metal Fabrication companies have the most revenue, and which grow fastest?

Commercial Metals Company has the highest Revenue among the 14 Metal Fabrication companies compared here, at $9,393 million. Ryerson Holding Corporation is next at $5,840 million. Ryerson Holding Corporation has the highest Revenue growth at 31.6%, so level and change sit with different companies. 10 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.

What the numbers say: Commercial Metals Company is the largest at $9,393 million, 60.8% ahead of Ryerson Holding Corporation. Ryerson Holding Corporation's growth is 31.6% from a $5,840 million base, with 18 reported quarters out of the last 20. Fast growth from a smaller base is not yet the same as proven size.

Commercial Metals Company · $9,393 millionLeader
60.8% versus #2 · Ryerson Holding CorporationGap
5/8 recent comparable periodsPersistence
10/14 companies · 214 observationsCoverage

What this means: Commercial Metals Company is the size to compare against; Ryerson Holding Corporation is the one growing fastest. The faster grower has to keep that growth and turn it into margin and returns before it counts as more than a fast start.

This conclusion weakens if: Commercial Metals Company's growth falls below Ryerson Holding Corporation's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.

Revenue · company comparison

Revenue, by reported quarter

  • Commercial Metals Company $2.7B
  • Ryerson Holding Corporation $2.0B
  • Mueller Industries, Inc. $1.4B
  • ATI Inc. $1.3B
  • Carpenter Technology Corporation $798M
Revenue, by reported quarter
QuarterCommercial Metals CompanyRyerson Holding CorporationMueller Industries, Inc.ATI Inc.Carpenter Technology Corporation
Mar 2022$2.0B$1.7B$1.0B$834M$489M
Jun 2022$2.5B$1.7B$1.2B$960M$564M
Sep 2022$2.4B$1.5B$945M$1.0B$523M
Dec 2022$2.2B$1.3B$878M—$579M
Mar 2023$2.0B$1.4B—$1.0B$690M
Jun 2023$2.3B$1.3B$971M$1.0B$758M
Sep 2023$2.2B$1.2B$897M$1.0B$652M
Dec 2023$2.0B$1.1B$732M$1.0B$624M
Mar 2024$1.8B$1.2B$850M$1.0B$685M
Jun 2024$2.1B$1.2B$998M$1.1B$799M
Sep 2024$2.0B$1.1B$998M$1.1B$718M
Dec 2024$1.9B$1.0B$924M$1.2B$677M
Mar 2025$1.8B$1.1B$1.0B$1.1B$727M
Jun 2025$2.0B$1.2B$1.1B$1.1B$756M
Sep 2025$2.1B$1.2B$1.1B$1.1B$734M
Dec 2025$2.1B$1.1B$962M$1.2B$728M
Mar 2026$2.1B$1.6B$1.2B$1.2B$812M
Jun 2026$2.5B$2.0B$1.4B$1.3B$851M
Sep 2026$2.7B—$1.4B—$798M
Dec 2026—————

Revenue growth, by reported quarter

  • Commercial Metals Company 26%
  • Ryerson Holding Corporation 72%
  • Mueller Industries, Inc. 32%
  • ATI Inc. 11%
  • Carpenter Technology Corporation 8.7%
Revenue growth, by reported quarter
QuarterCommercial Metals CompanyRyerson Holding CorporationMueller Industries, Inc.ATI Inc.Carpenter Technology Corporation
Mar 2022—————
Jun 2022—23%14%56%34%
Sep 202219%−2.0%−3.8%42%35%
Dec 202212%−16%−8.2%—46%
Mar 20230.5%−20%—24%41%
Jun 2023−6.8%−23%−16%9.0%34%
Sep 2023−8.2%−19%−5.1%1.4%25%
Dec 2023−10%−14%−17%—7.8%
Mar 2024−8.4%−12%—0.5%−0.7%
Jun 2024−11%−8.8%2.8%4.7%5.4%
Sep 2024−9.6%−9.6%11%0.5%10%
Dec 2024−4.6%−9.4%26%14%8.5%
Mar 2025−5.1%−8.3%18%9.7%6.1%
Jun 2025−2.8%−4.7%14%4.1%−5.4%
Sep 20256.0%3.1%8.0%7.1%2.2%
Dec 202511%9.7%4.1%0.3%7.5%
Mar 202622%38%19%0.7%12%
Jun 202623%72%25%11%13%
Sep 202626%—32%—8.7%
Dec 2026—————

10 of 14 companies report revenue, 10 of 14 revenue growth. On every company-comparison chart on this page the five leaders are drawn, level and change on separate charts, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

Revenue · largest

Revenue growth · fastest growers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

Revenue, every company
CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Commercial Metals Company CMC$2.7B26%Sep 2026
Ryerson Holding Corporation RYZ$2.0B72%Jun 2026
Mueller Industries, Inc. MLI$1.4B32%Sep 2026
ATI Inc. ATI$1.3B11%Jun 2026
ESAB Corporation ESAB$808M13%Sep 2026
Carpenter Technology Corporation CRS$798M8.7%Sep 2026
Worthington Enterprises, Inc. WOR$344M13%Sep 2026
Tredegar Corporation TG$216M21%Jun 2026
Insteel Industries Inc. IIIN$209M31%Dec 2026
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. MEC$163M23%Jun 2026
Proto Labs, Inc. PRLB$149M10%Jun 2026
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation AP$103M−8.9%Jun 2026

Revenue shows both size and speed. A large company can absorb shocks and pay for wide distribution; faster growth can mean market-share gains, new capacity or stronger demand. The best sign is usually growth that lasts without hurting margins and returns.

What to watch

Watch the next two reported quarters for growth persistence, margin conversion and whether the leader is gaining share without stretching working capital.

Which Metal Fabrication companies keep the most from each $100 of sales?

Carpenter Technology Corporation has the highest OPM among the 14 Metal Fabrication companies compared here, at 24.7%. Mueller Industries, Inc. is next at 19.5%. Proto Labs, Inc. has the highest Margin change at +5.1 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 12 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.

What the numbers say: Carpenter Technology Corporation leads opm at 24.7%; Proto Labs, Inc. leads margin change at +5.1 percentage points.

Carpenter Technology Corporation · 24.7%Leader
26.7% versus #2 · Mueller Industries, Inc.Gap
8/8 recent comparable periodsPersistence
12/14 companies · 214 observationsCoverage

What this means: Carpenter Technology Corporation sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.

Operating margin · company comparison

OPM, by reported quarter

  • Carpenter Technology Corporation 25%
  • Mueller Industries, Inc. 20%
  • ATI Inc. 18%
  • ESAB Corporation 12%
  • Proto Labs, Inc. 8.9%
OPM, by reported quarter
QuarterCarpenter Technology CorporationMueller Industries, Inc.ATI Inc.ESAB CorporationProto Labs, Inc.
Mar 20220.2%21%11%—6.4%
Jun 20223.5%24%10%14%8.2%
Sep 20221.1%22%10%14%6.0%
Dec 20223.5%22%—14%1.2%
Mar 20235.3%—11%15%3.0%
Jun 20238.0%24%12%16%4.7%
Sep 202310%21%12%15%8.0%
Dec 202311%19%12%18%6.7%
Mar 202413%22%11%16%5.3%
Jun 20248.7%21%13%18%4.8%
Sep 202416%20%13%16%6.8%
Dec 202417%18%13%18%3.4%
Mar 202518%19%13%—3.6%
Jun 202520%24%14%17%3.8%
Sep 202521%24%15%15%6.5%
Dec 202521%18%15%15%5.7%
Mar 202623%23%16%—8.1%
Jun 202624%22%18%14%8.9%
Sep 202625%20%—12%—
Dec 2026—————

Margin change, by reported quarter

  • Carpenter Technology Corporation +4.0 pp
  • Mueller Industries, Inc. −4.7 pp
  • ATI Inc. +3.8 pp
  • ESAB Corporation −3.4 pp
  • Proto Labs, Inc. +5.1 pp
Margin change, by reported quarter
QuarterCarpenter Technology CorporationMueller Industries, Inc.ATI Inc.ESAB CorporationProto Labs, Inc.
Mar 2022—————
Jun 2022+20.3 pp+8.0 pp+11.8 pp—−4.9 pp
Sep 2022+4.9 pp−2.1 pp−1.7 pp+1.1 pp+0.5 pp
Dec 2022+10.3 pp+3.8 pp—+0.5 pp+1.4 pp
Mar 2023+5.1 pp—0.0 pp—−3.4 pp
Jun 2023+4.5 pp0.0 pp+1.6 pp+1.5 pp−3.5 pp
Sep 2023+8.9 pp−0.4 pp+1.4 pp+1.1 pp+2.0 pp
Dec 2023+7.1 pp−3.1 pp—+3.4 pp+5.5 pp
Mar 2024+7.3 pp—+0.4 pp+1.7 pp+2.3 pp
Jun 2024+0.7 pp−2.6 pp+1.4 pp+1.8 pp+0.1 pp
Sep 2024+5.8 pp−0.9 pp+1.9 pp+0.7 pp−1.2 pp
Dec 2024+6.4 pp−0.3 pp+0.7 pp+0.6 pp−3.3 pp
Mar 2025+5.8 pp−2.4 pp+2.3 pp—−1.7 pp
Jun 2025+10.8 pp+2.5 pp+1.4 pp−0.7 pp−1.0 pp
Sep 2025+4.9 pp+3.8 pp+1.7 pp−0.6 pp−0.3 pp
Dec 2025+4.1 pp−0.7 pp+1.9 pp−2.8 pp+2.3 pp
Mar 2026+4.4 pp+3.8 pp+2.8 pp—+4.5 pp
Jun 2026+4.6 pp−1.7 pp+3.8 pp−3.4 pp+5.1 pp
Sep 2026+4.0 pp−4.7 pp—−3.4 pp—
Dec 2026—————

12 of 14 companies report OPM, 12 of 14 margin change.

OPM · highest

  1. 1Carpenter Technology CorporationCRS25%
  2. 2Mueller Industries, Inc.MLI20%
  3. 3ATI Inc.ATI · older report18%
  4. 4ESAB CorporationESAB12%
  5. 5Proto Labs, Inc.PRLB · older report8.9%

Margin change · fastest expanders

  1. 1Proto Labs, Inc.PRLB · older report+5.1 pp
  2. 2Carpenter Technology CorporationCRS+4.0 pp
  3. 3ATI Inc.ATI · older report+3.8 pp
  4. 4Ampco-Pittsburgh CorporationAP · older report+3.2 pp
  5. 5Tredegar CorporationTG · older report+1.4 pp

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Operating margin, every company
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Carpenter Technology Corporation CRS25%+4.0 ppSep 2026
Mueller Industries, Inc. MLI20%−4.7 ppSep 2026
ATI Inc. ATI18%+3.8 ppJun 2026
ESAB Corporation ESAB12%−3.4 ppSep 2026
Proto Labs, Inc. PRLB8.9%+5.1 ppJun 2026
Commercial Metals Company CMC8.8%−1.3 ppSep 2026
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation AP6.4%+3.2 ppJun 2026
Insteel Industries Inc. IIIN5.1%−0.7 ppDec 2026
Worthington Enterprises, Inc. WOR4.0%−0.6 ppSep 2026
Tredegar Corporation TG4.0%+1.4 ppJun 2026
Ryerson Holding Corporation RYZ1.9%+0.8 ppJun 2026
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. MEC0.3%−1.8 ppJun 2026

What to watch

Watch whether the next two comparable periods confirm the current margin change rather than reversing it.

Which Metal Fabrication companies earn the most profit?

Mueller Industries, Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 14 Metal Fabrication companies compared here, at $864 million. Commercial Metals Company is next at $656 million. Commercial Metals Company has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Mueller Industries, Inc. earns the most, $864 million of profit over the last 12 months, 31.7% above Commercial Metals Company. Commercial Metals Company shows at least 100% on the scoring scale (681% in full) growth from a profit base of $656 million. A fast rate from a small base matters less than a large profit that keeps coming.

Mueller Industries, Inc. · $864 millionLeader
31.7% versus #2 · Commercial Metals CompanyGap
8/8 recent comparable periodsPersistence
10/14 companies · 214 observationsCoverage

What this means: Mueller Industries, Inc. sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.

Net profit · company comparison

Net profit, by reported quarter

  • Mueller Industries, Inc. $221M
  • Commercial Metals Company $213M
  • Carpenter Technology Corporation $162M
  • ATI Inc. $151M
  • Worthington Enterprises, Inc. $43M
Net profit, by reported quarter
QuarterMueller Industries, Inc.Commercial Metals CompanyCarpenter Technology CorporationATI Inc.Worthington Enterprises, Inc.
Mar 2022$158M$383M−$8M$31M$59M
Jun 2022$207M$312M$3M−$38M$86M
Sep 2022$155M$289M−$7M$61M$65M
Dec 2022$139M$262M$6M——
Mar 2023—$180M$19M$85M$50M
Jun 2023$173M$234M$38M$90M$134M
Sep 2023$178M$184M$44M$94M$100M
Dec 2023$119M$176M$43M$90M$28M
Mar 2024$138M$86M$6M$66M$22M
Jun 2024$160M$119M$94M$82M−$32M
Sep 2024$169M$104M$85M$83M$24M
Dec 2024$138M−$176M$84M$137M$28M
Mar 2025$157M$25M$95M$97M$39M
Jun 2025$246M$83M$112M$101M$4M
Sep 2025$208M$152M$123M$110M$35M
Dec 2025$154M$177M$105M$97M$27M
Mar 2026$239M$93M$140M$118M$45M
Jun 2026$250M$173M$162M$151M$48M
Sep 2026$221M$213M$162M—$43M
Dec 2026—————

Profit growth, by reported quarter

  • Mueller Industries, Inc. 6.3%
  • Commercial Metals Company 40%
  • Carpenter Technology Corporation 32%
  • ATI Inc. 50%
  • Worthington Enterprises, Inc. 23%
Profit growth, by reported quarter
QuarterMueller Industries, Inc.Commercial Metals CompanyCarpenter Technology CorporationATI Inc.Worthington Enterprises, Inc.
Mar 2022—————
Jun 202286%————
Sep 2022−9.9%90%—24%−54%
Dec 202210%12%———
Mar 2023—−53%—174%−15%
Jun 2023−16%−25%1,167%—56%
Sep 202315%−36%—54%54%
Dec 2023−14%−33%617%——
Mar 2024—−52%−68%−22%−56%
Jun 2024−7.5%−49%147%−8.9%−124%
Sep 2024−5.1%−43%93%−12%−76%
Dec 202416%−200%95%52%0.0%
Mar 202514%−71%1,483%47%77%
Jun 202554%−30%19%23%—
Sep 202523%46%45%33%46%
Dec 202512%—25%−29%−3.6%
Mar 202652%272%47%22%15%
Jun 20261.6%108%45%50%1,100%
Sep 20266.3%40%32%—23%
Dec 2026—————

10 of 14 companies report net profit, 6 of 14 profit growth. The profit growth chart is drawn inside its usual range; a quarter far outside it (often a first quarter after listing or a near-zero base) is marked with an arrow at the edge, with its exact value in the hover card and the table.

Net profit · largest

Profit growth · fastest growers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Net profit, every company
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Mueller Industries, Inc. MLI$221M6.3%Sep 2026
Commercial Metals Company CMC$213M40%Sep 2026
Carpenter Technology Corporation CRS$162M32%Sep 2026
ATI Inc. ATI$151M50%Jun 2026
Worthington Enterprises, Inc. WOR$43M23%Sep 2026
ESAB Corporation ESAB$34M−50%Sep 2026
Ryerson Holding Corporation RYZ$16M700%Jun 2026
Proto Labs, Inc. PRLB$9M125%Jun 2026
Insteel Industries Inc. IIIN$8M0.0%Dec 2026
Tredegar Corporation TG$6M200%Jun 2026
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation AP$2M−100%Jun 2026
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. MEC−$2M−125%Jun 2026

What to watch

Watch whether the next two comparable periods confirm the current profit growth rather than reversing it.

Which Metal Fabrication companies earn the best return on capital?

Mueller Industries, Inc. has the highest ROCE among the 14 Metal Fabrication companies compared here, at 28.3%. Carpenter Technology Corporation is next at 22.6%. Tredegar Corporation has the highest ROCE change at +10.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 14 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.

What the numbers say: Mueller Industries, Inc. leads ROCE at 28.3%, 5.7 percentage points above Carpenter Technology Corporation. A high return reported once may be one good year; a high return reported year after year shows a lasting business.

Mueller Industries, Inc. · 28.3%Leader
25.2% versus #2 · Carpenter Technology CorporationGap
7/8 recent comparable periodsPersistence
14/14 companies · 214 observationsCoverage

What this means: Mueller Industries, Inc. sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.

Return on capital · company comparison

ROCE, by reported quarter

  • Mueller Industries, Inc. 28%
  • Carpenter Technology Corporation 23%
  • ATI Inc. 18%
  • Tredegar Corporation 14%
ROCE, by reported quarter
QuarterMueller Industries, Inc.Carpenter Technology CorporationATI Inc.Tredegar Corporation
Mar 202248%−1.4%6.2%15%
Jun 202251%−0.8%9.6%16%
Sep 202249%0.0%10%14%
Dec 202246%1.8%—9.4%
Mar 2023—3.2%17%4.7%
Jun 202343%4.7%17%−1.0%
Sep 202337%7.0%3.5%−4.4%
Dec 202330%8.6%16%—
Mar 202427%10%11%−0.7%
Jun 202427%10%12%6.4%
Sep 202426%12%11%10%
Dec 202427%13%14%7.7%
Mar 202528%15%14%6.4%
Jun 202527%17%15%3.6%
Sep 202528%18%16%8.2%
Dec 202527%19%16%14%
Mar 202628%20%17%13%
Jun 202628%21%18%14%
Sep 202628%23%——
Dec 2026————

ROCE change, by reported quarter

  • Mueller Industries, Inc. +0.5 pp
  • Carpenter Technology Corporation +4.5 pp
  • ATI Inc. +2.2 pp
  • Tredegar Corporation +10.5 pp
ROCE change, by reported quarter
QuarterMueller Industries, Inc.Carpenter Technology CorporationATI Inc.Tredegar Corporation
Mar 2022————
Jun 2022————
Sep 2022————
Dec 2022————
Mar 2023—+4.6 pp+10.5 pp−9.8 pp
Jun 2023−7.8 pp+5.5 pp+7.4 pp−16.9 pp
Sep 2023−12.7 pp+7.0 pp−6.5 pp−17.9 pp
Dec 2023−15.8 pp+6.8 pp——
Mar 2024—+7.0 pp−5.9 pp−5.4 pp
Jun 2024−16.6 pp+5.5 pp−5.0 pp+7.4 pp
Sep 2024−10.5 pp+4.8 pp+7.7 pp+14.7 pp
Dec 2024−3.8 pp+4.7 pp−2.4 pp—
Mar 2025+0.5 pp+4.6 pp+3.6 pp+7.1 pp
Jun 2025+0.8 pp+6.8 pp+3.3 pp−2.8 pp
Sep 2025+1.7 pp+6.3 pp+4.9 pp−2.1 pp
Dec 2025+0.3 pp+5.7 pp+2.6 pp+5.9 pp
Mar 2026+0.3 pp+5.3 pp+2.1 pp+6.5 pp
Jun 2026+0.4 pp+4.0 pp+2.2 pp+10.5 pp
Sep 2026+0.5 pp+4.5 pp——
Dec 2026————

14 of 14 companies report ROCE, 14 of 14 ROCE change.

ROCE · highest

  1. 1Mueller Industries, Inc.MLI28%
  2. 2Carpenter Technology CorporationCRS23%
  3. 3Xinxu Copper Industry Technology LimitedXXC18%
  4. 4ATI Inc.ATI · older report18%
  5. 5Tredegar CorporationTG · older report14%

ROCE change · fastest improvers

  1. 1Tredegar CorporationTG · older report+10.5 pp
  2. 2Carpenter Technology CorporationCRS+4.5 pp
  3. 3Proto Labs, Inc.PRLB · older report+2.4 pp
  4. 4ATI Inc.ATI · older report+2.2 pp
  5. 5Ryerson Holding CorporationRYZ · older report+1.4 pp

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Return on capital, every company
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Mueller Industries, Inc. MLI28%+0.5 ppSep 2026
Carpenter Technology Corporation CRS23%+4.5 ppSep 2026
ATI Inc. ATI18%+2.2 ppJun 2026
Tredegar Corporation TG14%+10.5 ppJun 2026
Commercial Metals Company CMC10%+1.3 ppSep 2026
Insteel Industries Inc. IIIN9.5%−6.7 ppDec 2026
ESAB Corporation ESAB7.4%−4.7 ppSep 2026
Proto Labs, Inc. PRLB5.7%+2.4 ppJun 2026
Worthington Enterprises, Inc. WOR5.6%+1.1 ppSep 2026
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation AP4.3%+0.9 ppJun 2026
Ryerson Holding Corporation RYZ1.1%+1.4 ppJun 2026
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. MEC−1.8%−4.5 ppJun 2026

What to watch

Watch whether the next two comparable periods confirm the current roce change rather than reversing it.

How are Metal Fabrication stocks valued against growth and quality?

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 14 Metal Fabrication companies compared here, at 0.31×. Carpenter Technology Corporation is next at 0.87×. Ryerson Holding Corporation has the lowest P/E at −39.1×, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.

What the numbers say: Worthington Enterprises, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.31×, 64.4% below Carpenter Technology Corporation. That would need today's multiple, the company's own history and steady growth to agree.

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. · 0.31×Leader
64.4% versus #2 · Carpenter Technology CorporationGap
0/8 recent comparable periodsPersistence
5/14 companies · 24 observationsCoverage

What this means: A low valuation is a reason to look closer at the business, not a conclusion on its own.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is worked out the same way every time, as the P/E on the last 12 months of reported earnings divided by that growth rate, never on expected earnings. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.

Valuation · company comparison

PEG, by reported quarter

  • Worthington Enterprises, Inc. 0.3
  • Carpenter Technology Corporation 0.9
  • Mueller Industries, Inc. 0.9
  • Proto Labs, Inc. 1.6
  • ATI Inc. 3.2
PEG, by reported quarter
QuarterWorthington Enterprises, Inc.Carpenter Technology CorporationMueller Industries, Inc.Proto Labs, Inc.ATI Inc.
Mar 2022—————
Jun 2022—————
Sep 2022—————
Dec 2022—————
Mar 2023—————
Jun 2023—————
Sep 2023—————
Dec 2023—————
Mar 2024—————
Jun 2024—————
Sep 2024—————
Dec 2024—————
Mar 2025————1.0
Jun 2025——0.6—1.1
Sep 2025——0.5—0.7
Dec 2025——0.61.63.5
Mar 2026—1.20.4—4.8
Jun 2026—1.40.8—3.2
Sep 20260.30.90.9——
Dec 2026—————

P/E, by reported quarter

  • Worthington Enterprises, Inc. 17.2×
  • Carpenter Technology Corporation 33.8×
  • Mueller Industries, Inc. 15.5×
  • Proto Labs, Inc. 63.6×
  • ATI Inc. 56.6×
P/E, by reported quarter
QuarterWorthington Enterprises, Inc.Carpenter Technology CorporationMueller Industries, Inc.Proto Labs, Inc.ATI Inc.
Mar 20227.0×—5.8×41.8×5,584.7×
Jun 20226.2×−27.4×4.6×53.9×—
Sep 20228.1×—5.1×42.6×142.8×
Dec 2022—−308.5×5.1×——
Mar 202315.8×107.5×—−8.4×13.5×
Jun 202311.6×48.8×6.2×—11.3×
Sep 202313.8×30.8×7.7×−6.6×12.9×
Dec 202312.1×24.4×8.9×58.3×9.9×
Mar 202411.4×27.0×10.8×46.4×16.2×
Jun 2024—29.2×11.8×31.6×18.0×
Sep 202459.2×35.1×13.9×30.8×21.9×
Dec 202448.1×31.5×15.0×—21.5×
Mar 202534.8×25.3×13.6×56.9×18.0×
Jun 202530.6×36.6×12.4×64.3×29.3×
Sep 202530.7×29.6×15.0×80.5×25.7×
Dec 202525.7×36.1×17.1×56.4×39.3×
Mar 202624.8×41.0×14.2×52.6×45.0×
Jun 202617.9×57.9×16.7×63.6×56.6×
Sep 202617.2×33.8×15.5×——
Dec 2026—————

5 of 14 companies report PEG, 12 of 14 P/E.

PEG · lowest PEG

P/E · lowest P/E

  1. 1Ryerson Holding CorporationRYZ · older report−39.1×
  2. 2Ampco-Pittsburgh CorporationAP · older report−3.0×
  3. 3Tredegar CorporationTG · older report8.2×
  4. 4Commercial Metals CompanyCMC11.4×
  5. 5Mayville Engineering Company, Inc.MEC · older report12.1×

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Valuation, every company
CompanyPEGP/EReported
ATI Inc. ATI3.256.6×Jun 2026
Proto Labs, Inc. PRLB1.663.6×Jun 2026
ESAB Corporation ESAB1.033.6×Sep 2026
Insteel Industries Inc. IIIN1.019.4×Dec 2026
Mueller Industries, Inc. MLI0.915.5×Sep 2026
Carpenter Technology Corporation CRS0.933.8×Sep 2026
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. MEC0.612.1×Jun 2026
Worthington Enterprises, Inc. WOR0.317.2×Sep 2026
Commercial Metals Company CMC—11.4×Sep 2026
Ryerson Holding Corporation RYZ—−39.1×Jun 2026
Tredegar Corporation TG—8.2×Jun 2026
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation AP—−3.0×Jun 2026

What to watch

Watch whether the next two comparable periods confirm the current p/e rather than reversing it.

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Metal Fabrication comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 6 of the 14 companies report on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so their ranks are marked stale. A high growth rate can still come from a very small starting figure.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can come from a very small starting figure. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary, or look high because the capital base is small. It is best read beside margin, cash flow and how much is spent back on the business.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks published data only. Management quality, upcoming events and risks are not part of it.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 6 companies have older fundamental reporting dates than the sector’s freshest reporters; their ranks carry a stale marker.

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 14 Metal Fabrication companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Dec 2026 and market data through 4 November 2026.

FundamentalsThrough Dec 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 4 November 2026 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and old evidence lowers confidence and pulls the 0 to 100 score toward the middle.

What else do people ask about Metal Fabrication stocks?

These 22 answers restate the Metal Fabrication comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 14 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Dec 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 4 November 2026. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Metal Fabrication sector outperforming S&P 500?

Metal Fabrication has done better than the S&P 500 by 10.1% over 52 weeks, but is 16.4% behind over the last 13 weeks.

3 of 14 companies we track are beating the S&P 500 on relative strength (how a share price has done against the index over recent months) (2 have no relative-strength reading yet), and 3 of the 12 with a long enough price history are ahead of the industry itself.

Which Metal Fabrication company is largest by revenue?

Commercial Metals Company leads with revenue of $9,393 million, based on 10 of 14 comparable companies through Sep 2026.

Which Metal Fabrication company is growing fastest?

Ryerson Holding Corporation has the fastest current revenue growth at 31.6%, across 10 of 14 comparable companies.

Which Metal Fabrication company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. ranks first at 62.8 out of 100, with 81.1% of the evidence available. The score ranks published data; it is not a recommendation.

Which Metal Fabrication company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.31, among 5 of 14 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Metal Fabrication comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Dec 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four parts add up directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or old evidence moves only that part toward the middle.

Which Metal Fabrication company is the biggest?

Commercial Metals Company is the largest, with revenue of $9,393 million over the last 12 months, ahead of Ryerson Holding Corporation at $5,840 million. That covers 10 of 14 companies with comparable reporting through Sep 2026.

Which Metal Fabrication company has the best profit margins?

Carpenter Technology Corporation has the highest operating margin at 24.7%, from 12 of 14 comparable companies. Proto Labs, Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +5.1 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is steady or rising, not when it is at a peak.

Which Metal Fabrication company makes the most profit?

Mueller Industries, Inc. earns the most, at $864 million of net profit over the last 12 months, from 10 of 14 comparable companies.

Commercial Metals Company has the fastest profit growth at the 100% cap of the scoring scale, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Metal Fabrication company earns the highest return on capital?

Mueller Industries, Inc. leads on return on capital employed at 28.3%, across 14 of 14 companies. A high return that repeats for years shows a lasting business, while a single high reading can come from a small capital base or one good year.

Which Metal Fabrication stock has the lowest PEG ratio?

On PEG (where a lower number means a lower price for what the company earns), Worthington Enterprises, Inc. has the lowest at 0.31×. Only 5 of 14 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a ranking of the whole industry.

A low multiple is a reason to look closer at the business, not a conclusion on its own.

Is the Metal Fabrication sector beating the market?

Metal Fabrication has done better than the S&P 500 by 10.1% over the last 52 weeks, but is 16.4% behind over the last 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members.

Inside the sector, 3 of the 14 companies we track are beating the market on their own (2 have no relative-strength reading yet). Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Metal Fabrication stock has the strongest price momentum?

Ryerson Holding Corporation has the strongest relative strength against the S&P 500, meaning its share price has done best against the index. A price can move well before the business results back it up, and sometimes without them.

Which Metal Fabrication company has the highest 4-Factor score?

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. scores 62.8 out of 100, with 81.1% of the evidence available, from 20.7 points on growth and earnings, 8 on capital efficiency, 14.9 on valuation and 19.2 on relative strength. It ranks published data only; management quality, upcoming events and risks are not part of the score.

How many Metal Fabrication companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

This comparison covers 14 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Dec 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list, nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Metal Fabrication sector?

The 14 Metal Fabrication companies on this page carry $71,041 million of combined market value. ATI Inc. is the largest at $24,324 million, about 34% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 4 November 2026.

What is the Metal Fabrication sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 14 Metal Fabrication companies on this page is 19.4×, measured on the 10 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past.

Figures are as of 4 November 2026.

How is the Metal Fabrication sector performing?

3 of the 14 Metal Fabrication companies we track are doing better than the S&P 500 on relative strength (how a share price has done against the index over recent months) (2 have no relative-strength reading yet).

The sector itself is 10.1% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members.

How many Metal Fabrication stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 14 listed Metal Fabrication companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Dec 2026. Membership is the full industry list, nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing figures are never estimated, copied forward or swapped for a similar-looking line, and a company with missing evidence has its score pulled toward the middle rather than scored as bad.

Is this advice?

No, every figure here is worked out by code from company filings and market data, for research. It does not account for your situation and is not a substitute for advice from a registered adviser.

More lists

Every Sector Alpha list, grouped

Every US industry against its index · What changed this week · Plain-text data
Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers · Fundamentals through Dec 2026 · Prices through 4 November 2026. Every ranking is worked out by code from reported figures. Missing values stay missing.

X · Instagram · YouTube · About · Newsletter · Newsletter archive
This is research, not advice. We’re not SEBI-registered.