Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-04
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Apparel Manufacturing Stocks

Apparel Manufacturing: PVH Corp. owns the largest revenue base; FIGS, Inc. has the fastest current growth.

01 · the industry itself · before any single company

How has Apparel Manufacturing moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 12% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 16% on average over the last four reported quarters.

ASLEEP · 1y +12.5%~Moving with the index4 of 14 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS — · 9/14 >200d (+0) · 4/14 lead (+0) · EPS 7/14↑

20020262025202420232022 203348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100Jun 22Dec 22Jun 23Dec 23Jun 24Dec 24Jun 25Dec 25Jun 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reporting · thin coverageJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 12 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 95, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 12 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 88, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 14 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 84, against 100 at the start · down 2.5% on a year ago · 10 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 80, against 100 at the start · down 20.5% on a year ago · 12 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 69, against 100 at the start · down 29.8% on a year ago · 14 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 68, against 100 at the start · down 8.3% on a year ago · 14 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 76, against 100 at the start · down 12.2% on a year ago · 12 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 67, against 100 at the start · up 2.2% on a year ago · 12 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 67, against 100 at the start · down 3.1% on a year ago · 12 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 72, against 100 at the start · down 11.6% on a year ago · 12 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 73, against 100 at the start · up 0.5% on a year ago · 12 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 62, against 100 at the start · up 5.2% on a year ago · 12 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 62, against 100 at the start · up 1.0% on a year ago · 12 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 48, against 100 at the start · down 12.6% on a year ago · 11 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 37, against 100 at the start · down 19.7% on a year ago · 12 reportingJun 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 68, against 100 at the start · down 34.5% on a year ago · 5 reporting · thin coverageNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two68No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
20020262025202420232022 203348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100Jun 22Jun 23Jun 24Jun 25Jun 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reporting · thin coverageJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 12 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 95, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 12 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 88, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 14 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 84, against 100 at the start · down 2.5% on a year ago · 10 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 80, against 100 at the start · down 20.5% on a year ago · 12 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 69, against 100 at the start · down 29.8% on a year ago · 14 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 68, against 100 at the start · down 8.3% on a year ago · 14 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 76, against 100 at the start · down 12.2% on a year ago · 12 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 67, against 100 at the start · up 2.2% on a year ago · 12 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 67, against 100 at the start · down 3.1% on a year ago · 12 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 72, against 100 at the start · down 11.6% on a year ago · 12 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 73, against 100 at the start · up 0.5% on a year ago · 12 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 62, against 100 at the start · up 5.2% on a year ago · 12 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 62, against 100 at the start · up 1.0% on a year ago · 12 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 48, against 100 at the start · down 12.6% on a year ago · 11 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 37, against 100 at the start · down 19.7% on a year ago · 12 reportingJun 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 68, against 100 at the start · down 34.5% on a year ago · 5 reporting · thin coverageNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two68No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Apparel Manufacturing, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 14 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Apparel Manufacturing outperforming S&P 500?

Apparel Manufacturing has outperformed S&P 500 by 10.6% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 5.6%. 8 of 16 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. is the strongest against the sector itself at +16.9%.

+5.6%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+10.6%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
8/16Stocks leading S&P 500
5/16Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Apparel Manufacturing has outperformed S&P 500 by 10.6% over 52 weeks and 5.6% over 13 weeks. 8 of 16 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 5 of 16 beat the sector itself. PVH Corp. leads with revenue of $8,991 million, based on 9 of 16 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Companies
16
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$72.2B
Ralph Lauren Corporation
Revenue growing
6/9
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
8/16
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 16
03 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 79.3% evidence confidence.
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.GIII 62.5/100Mixed-positive evidence79% evidence BREAKING OUT 16.4/35 Revenue -7.8% · PAT -35.2% · OPM change 14.4 pp 95% evidence 16.3/25 ROCE 4.1% · OPM 15.9% 76% evidence 14.7/20 P/E 11× · PEG 0.45 65% evidence 15.1/20 RS sector 4.7% · RS bench 9.5% · 1Y 49.6%9 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.4 + 16.3 + 14.7 + 15.1 = 62.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 9.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
2Kontoor Brands, Inc.KTB 61.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 20.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.8 pp 45% evidence 17.3/25 ROCE 5.4% · OPM 14.7% 76% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 13.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.9/20 RS sector -2.4% · RS bench 2% · 1Y 23.4%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.1 + 17.3 + 11.1 + 12.9 = 61.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
3Levi Strauss & Co.LEVI 59.1/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence TURNING 20.8/35 Revenue 7.3% · PAT 31% · OPM change 0.3 pp 95% evidence 13.3/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM 7.8% 76% evidence 15.1/20 P/E 14.3× · PEG 0.24 65% evidence 9.9/20 RS sector -3.9% · RS bench 0.5% · 1Y 22.4%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.8 + 13.3 + 15.1 + 9.9 = 59.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4PVH Corp.PVH 58.6/100Mixed-positive evidence77% evidence ASLEEP 24.1/35 Revenue 3.5% · PAT -60.7% · OPM change 22.8 pp 71% evidence 10.2/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 6.1% 76% evidence 14.3/20 P/E 29× · PEG 0.18 65% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector -2.1% · RS bench 2.4% · 1Y 21.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.1 + 10.2 + 14.3 + 10 = 58.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Ralph Lauren CorporationRL 56.5/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence TURNING 22.5/35 Revenue 14.6% · PAT 26.8% · OPM change 0.4 pp 83% evidence 15.4/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 9.5% 76% evidence 11.9/20 P/E 21.7× · PEG 0.72 65% evidence 6.7/20 RS sector -7.9% · RS bench -3.6% · 1Y 31.1%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.5 + 15.4 + 11.9 + 6.7 = 56.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Superior Group of Companies, Inc.SGC 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence68% evidence TURNING 16.1/35 Revenue 1.1% · PAT 28.6% · OPM change 1.2 pp 62% evidence 7.3/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 1.4% 76% evidence 13.1/20 P/E 17.8× · PEG 0.67 65% evidence 15.8/20 RS sector 8.6% · RS bench 13.4% · 1Y 24.4%9 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.1 + 7.3 + 13.1 + 15.8 = 52.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 13.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
7Under Armour, Inc.UAA 48.5/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence TURNING 17.1/35 Revenue -3.9% · PAT — · OPM change 3.2 pp 62% evidence 5.5/25 ROCE -1.1% · OPM -2.9% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 31× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.8/20 RS sector 2.7% · RS bench 7.3% · 1Y 25.7%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.1 + 5.5 + 9.1 + 16.8 = 48.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 7.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
8Lakeland Industries, Inc.LAKE 46.2/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence TURNING 23.7/35 Revenue 7.8% · PAT — · OPM change 14.7 pp 71% evidence 7.2/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 4.8% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 90.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.6/20 RS sector -11.8% · RS bench -7.5% · 1Y -14.7%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 23.7 + 7.2 + 8.7 + 6.6 = 46.2 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -11.8% and the one-year return is -14.7%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
9FIGS, Inc.FIGS 45.6/100Mixed-negative evidence68% evidence ASLEEP 23.1/35 Revenue 18.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3 pp 62% evidence 8.8/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 2.8% 76% evidence 8.3/20 P/E 67.1× · PEG 1.24 65% evidence 5.4/20 RS sector -14.8% · RS bench -10.8% · 1Y 74.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 23.1 + 8.8 + 8.3 + 5.4 = 45.6 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -14.8% and the one-year return is 74.4%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
10Columbia Sportswear CompanyCOLM 43.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 18.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.6 pp 45% evidence 10.8/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 5.4% 76% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 16.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.9/20 RS sector -14.2% · RS bench -10.3% · 1Y 13.6%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.1 + 10.8 + 10.7 + 3.9 = 43.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
11Canada Goose Holdings Inc.GOOS 36.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 19.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0 pp 45% evidence 7.2/25 ROCE -8.4% · OPM 14.3% 76% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 25× · PEG — 15% evidence 0.4/20 RS sector -36.4% · RS bench -33.2% · 1Y -21.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.3 + 7.2 + 9.5 + 0.4 = 36.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12Gildan Activewear Inc.GIL 35.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 12.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -18.3 pp 45% evidence 12.4/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM -0.1% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 101.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 2.5/20 RS sector -17.8% · RS bench -13.8% · 1Y 10%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.1 + 12.4 + 8.5 + 2.5 = 35.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13Oxford Industries, Inc.OXM 32.1/100Adverse evidence69% evidence BASING 4.9/35 Revenue -2.5% · PAT -148.2% · OPM change -3.5 pp 95% evidence 10.9/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 5.7% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 10× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.8/20 RS sector -15.6% · RS bench -11.7% · 1Y -0.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 4.9 + 10.9 + 11.5 + 4.8 = 32.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
14V.F. CorporationVFC 32.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 6.2 pp 45% evidence 4.7/25 ROCE -1.3% · OPM 2.8% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 24.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 0.6/20 RS sector -23.4% · RS bench -19.8% · 1Y 28.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17 + 4.7 + 9.7 + 0.6 = 32 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
15Ermenegildo Zegna N.V.ZGN 55.8/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence LEADER 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence 11.9/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM — 46% evidence 9.9/20 P/E 23× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.0/20 RS sector 16.9% · RS bench 22% · 1Y 91.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17 + 11.9 + 9.9 + 17 = 55.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
16JX Luxventure Group Inc.JXG 49.4/100Thin evidence · provisional32% evidence 15.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence 6.8/25 ROCE -27.9% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 19.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.4/20 RS sector 14.4% · RS bench 19.8% · 1Y -26%8 of 8 weeks ahead to 2026-07-10 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.9 + 6.8 + 10.3 + 16.4 = 49.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
Showing 10 of 16 companies
04 · what price has already done

Market action

Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. has the strongest one-year price move in Apparel Manufacturing at +91.8%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +22%. 8 of 16 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

PVH Corp. has the highest Revenue among the 16 Apparel Manufacturing companies compared here, at $8,991 million. Ralph Lauren Corporation is next at $8,115 million. FIGS, Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at 18.9%, so level and change sit with different companies. 9 of 16 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: PVH Corp. is the scale leader at $8,991 million, 10.8% ahead of Ralph Lauren Corporation. FIGS, Inc.'s growth is 18.9% from a $667 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderPVH Corp. · $8,991 million
Gap10.8% versus #2 · Ralph Lauren Corporation
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage9/16 companies · 284 observations

Investor read: PVH Corp. is the scale benchmark; FIGS, Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: PVH Corp.'s growth falls below FIGS, Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1PVH Corp. PVH$9.0B
2Ralph Lauren Corporation RL$8.1B
3Levi Strauss & Co. LEVI$6.6B
4Under Armour, Inc. UAA$5.0B
5G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. GIII$2.9B
Revenue growthfastest growers
1FIGS, Inc. FIGS19%
2Ralph Lauren Corporation RL15%
3Lakeland Industries, Inc. LAKE7.8%
4Levi Strauss & Co. LEVI7.3%
5PVH Corp. PVH3.5%
Revenue · company comparison
9/16 level · 9/16 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
V.F. Corporation VFC$2.2B1.0%Jun 2026
PVH Corp. PVH$2.0B2.1%Jun 2026
Ralph Lauren Corporation RL$2.0B17%Mar 2026
Levi Strauss & Co. LEVI$1.6B8.0%Jun 2026
Under Armour, Inc. UAA$1.2B-0.9%Mar 2026
Gildan Activewear Inc. GIL$1.2B64%Jun 2026
Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. ZGN$989M0.2%Dec 2025
Columbia Sportswear Company COLM$779M0.1%Jun 2026
Kontoor Brands, Inc. KTB$613M-6.8%Jun 2026
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. GIII$536M-8.2%Jun 2026
Canada Goose Holdings Inc. GOOS$453M18%Jun 2026
Oxford Industries, Inc. OXM$391M-0.5%Jun 2026
FIGS, Inc. FIGS$160M28%Mar 2026
Superior Group of Companies, Inc. SGC$141M2.9%Mar 2026
JX Luxventure Group Inc. JXG$58M164%Dec 2025
Lakeland Industries, Inc. LAKE$47M0.0%Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 16 companies with a series here. The remaining 4 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Canada Goose Holdings Inc. · GOOS

$233M
—
$586M
$223M
$70M
$277M
$577M
$293M
$85M
$281M
$358M
$88M
$268M
$608M
$385M
$108M
$273M
$695M
$453M
—

Columbia Sportswear Company · COLM

$805M
$1.1B
$762M
$578M
$955M
$1.2B
$821M
$621M
$986M
$1.1B
$770M
$570M
$932M
$1.1B
$778M
$605M
$943M
$1.1B
$779M
—

Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. · ZGN

—
$689M
—
$729M
—
$764M
—
$903M
—
$1.0B
—
$960M
—
$987M
—
$928M
—
$989M
—
—

FIGS, Inc. · FIGS

$103M
$129M
$110M
$122M
$129M
$145M
$120M
$138M
$142M
$145M
$119M
$144M
$140M
$152M
$125M
$153M
$152M
$202M
$160M
—

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. · GIII

$483M
$1.0B
$748M
$689M
$605M
$1.1B
$854M
$607M
$660M
$1.1B
$765M
$610M
$645M
$1.1B
$840M
$584M
$613M
$989M
$771M
$536M

Gildan Activewear Inc. · GIL

$747M
$802M
$784M
$775M
$896M
$850M
$720M
$703M
$840M
$870M
$696M
$862M
$891M
$822M
$712M
$919M
$911M
$1.1B
$1.2B
—

Kontoor Brands, Inc. · KTB

$652M
$681M
$680M
$614M
$607M
$732M
$667M
$616M
$655M
$670M
$631M
$607M
$670M
$699M
$423M
$658M
$853M
—
$1.0B
$613M

Levi Strauss & Co. · LEVI

$1.5B
$1.7B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.6B
$1.7B
$1.3B
$1.5B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.8B
$1.5B
$1.4B
$1.5B
$1.8B
$1.7B
$1.6B

PVH Corp. · PVH

$2.3B
$2.3B
$2.4B
$2.1B
$2.1B
$2.3B
$2.5B
$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.4B
—
$2.0B
$2.1B
$2.3B
$2.4B
$2.0B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$2.5B
$2.0B

Ralph Lauren Corporation · RL

$1.5B
$1.8B
—
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.6B
—
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.9B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.7B
$2.1B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$2.0B
$2.4B
$2.0B
—

Under Armour, Inc. · UAA

$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.6B
$1.6B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.2B
—

V.F. Corporation · VFC

$2.2B
$3.2B
$3.6B
$2.8B
$2.3B
$3.1B
—
$2.2B
$2.1B
$2.8B
$2.2B
$1.8B
$2.8B
$2.8B
$2.1B
$1.8B
$2.8B
$2.9B
$2.2B
—

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 16 companies with a series here. The remaining 4 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Canada Goose Holdings Inc. · GOOS

—
—
—
298%
-70%
—
-1.5%
31%
21%
1.4%
-38%
-70%
215%
116%
7.5%
23%
1.9%
14%
18%
—

Columbia Sportswear Company · COLM

—
—
—
2.1%
19%
3.5%
7.7%
7.4%
3.3%
-9.4%
-6.2%
-8.2%
-5.5%
3.5%
1.0%
6.1%
1.2%
-2.5%
0.1%
—

Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. · ZGN

—
13%
—
21%
—
11%
—
24%
—
31%
—
6.3%
—
-1.4%
—
-3.3%
—
0.2%
—
—

FIGS, Inc. · FIGS

—
—
—
21%
25%
12%
9.1%
13%
10%
0.0%
-0.8%
4.4%
-1.4%
4.8%
5.0%
6.3%
8.6%
33%
28%
—

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. · GIII

—
—
—
—
25%
6.2%
14%
-12%
9.1%
-1.0%
-10%
0.5%
-2.3%
1.9%
9.8%
-4.3%
-5.0%
-9.0%
-8.2%
-8.2%

Gildan Activewear Inc. · GIL

—
—
—
—
20%
6.0%
-8.2%
-9.3%
-6.3%
2.4%
-3.3%
23%
6.1%
-5.5%
2.3%
6.6%
2.2%
31%
64%
—

Kontoor Brands, Inc. · KTB

—
—
—
25%
-6.9%
7.5%
-1.9%
0.3%
7.9%
-8.5%
-5.4%
-1.5%
2.3%
4.3%
-33%
8.4%
27%
—
141%
-6.8%

Levi Strauss & Co. · LEVI

—
—
—
—
1.3%
-5.7%
6.1%
-9.1%
-0.4%
3.3%
-12%
1.7%
-4.5%
6.6%
3.2%
6.4%
6.9%
0.9%
14%
8.0%

PVH Corp. · PVH

—
—
—
—
-7.8%
-2.2%
2.4%
1.7%
3.5%
3.6%
—
-9.6%
-6.0%
-4.6%
—
1.6%
4.5%
1.7%
5.6%
2.1%

Ralph Lauren Corporation · RL

—
—
—
11%
-0.9%
-13%
—
1.2%
0.4%
22%
—
-1.9%
15%
11%
8.2%
14%
17%
12%
17%
—

Under Armour, Inc. · UAA

—
—
—
-0.2%
1.8%
3.5%
7.5%
-2.4%
-0.4%
-6.1%
-4.7%
-10%
-11%
-5.7%
-11%
-4.2%
-4.7%
-5.2%
-0.9%
—

V.F. Corporation · VFC

—
—
—
—
3.1%
-3.7%
—
-22%
-7.8%
-9.8%
—
-20%
32%
1.9%
-4.6%
-0.5%
1.6%
1.5%
1.0%
—
06 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. has the highest OPM among the 16 Apparel Manufacturing companies compared here, at 15.9%. Kontoor Brands, Inc. is next at 14.7%. PVH Corp. has the highest Margin change at +22.8 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 14 of 16 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. leads opm at 15.9%; PVH Corp. leads margin change at +22.8 percentage points.

LeaderG-III Apparel Group, Ltd. · 15.9%
Gap8.2% versus #2 · Kontoor Brands, Inc.
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage14/16 companies · 266 observations

Investor read: G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. GIII16%
2Kontoor Brands, Inc. KTB15%
3Canada Goose Holdings Inc. GOOS14%
4Ralph Lauren Corporation RL9.5%
5Levi Strauss & Co. LEVI7.8%
Margin changefastest expanders
1PVH Corp. PVH+22.8 pp
2Lakeland Industries, Inc. LAKE+14.7 pp
3G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. GIII+14.4 pp
4V.F. Corporation VFC+6.2 pp
5Under Armour, Inc. UAA+3.2 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
14/16 level · 14/16 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. GIII16%+14.4 ppJun 2026
Kontoor Brands, Inc. KTB15%+2.8 ppJun 2026
Canada Goose Holdings Inc. GOOS14%0.0 ppJun 2026
Ralph Lauren Corporation RL9.5%+0.4 ppMar 2026
Levi Strauss & Co. LEVI7.8%+0.3 ppJun 2026
PVH Corp. PVH6.1%+22.8 ppJun 2026
Oxford Industries, Inc. OXM5.7%−3.5 ppJun 2026
Columbia Sportswear Company COLM5.4%−0.6 ppJun 2026
Lakeland Industries, Inc. LAKE4.8%+14.7 ppJun 2026
V.F. Corporation VFC2.8%+6.2 ppJun 2026
FIGS, Inc. FIGS2.8%+3.0 ppMar 2026
Superior Group of Companies, Inc. SGC1.4%+1.2 ppMar 2026
Gildan Activewear Inc. GIL-0.1%−18.3 ppJun 2026
Under Armour, Inc. UAA-2.9%+3.2 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Canada Goose Holdings Inc. · GOOS

5.4%
—
35%
1.7%
-118%
7.8%
33%
6.0%
-118%
0.8%
6.5%
-110%
0.6%
34%
14%
-147%
-6.5%
29%
14%
—

Columbia Sportswear Company · COLM

17%
19%
11%
1.5%
15%
13%
6.9%
1.0%
14%
11%
5.8%
-4.2%
12%
13%
6.0%
-3.9%
7.1%
11%
5.4%
—

FIGS, Inc. · FIGS

10%
13%
13%
7.7%
8.7%
2.2%
2.7%
4.8%
7.0%
9.8%
0.4%
1.1%
-6.2%
5.9%
-0.2%
6.5%
6.4%
9.3%
2.8%
—

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. · GIII

8.1%
16%
9.0%
7.9%
5.2%
9.0%
-34%
2.5%
4.8%
18%
6.1%
2.2%
6.4%
15%
8.5%
1.5%
2.7%
11%
-3.8%
16%

Gildan Activewear Inc. · GIL

21%
25%
23%
21%
19%
21%
13%
18%
22%
18%
15%
16%
22%
22%
18%
22%
21%
9.2%
-0.1%
—

Kontoor Brands, Inc. · KTB

13%
10%
16%
15%
12%
12%
14%
10%
13%
11%
13%
12%
15%
12%
7.4%
12%
7.5%
—
12%
15%

Levi Strauss & Co. · LEVI

14%
11%
15%
5.2%
13%
8.6%
9.3%
0.7%
2.3%
9.3%
0.0%
1.5%
2.3%
12%
13%
7.5%
11%
12%
11%
7.8%

Oxford Industries, Inc. · OXM

21%
12%
11%
22%
21%
8.7%
11%
19%
16%
4.4%
-20%
13%
13%
-2.0%
5.2%
9.2%
6.3%
-28%
-2.1%
5.7%

PVH Corp. · PVH

12%
16%
9.2%
9.9%
8.3%
-9.4%
12%
9.2%
6.5%
9.7%
—
11%
8.4%
8.1%
8.9%
-17%
6.1%
7.9%
9.9%
6.1%

Ralph Lauren Corporation · RL

17%
16%
—
2.4%
12%
13%
—
2.6%
11%
16%
6.9%
14%
10%
18%
9.1%
16%
12%
20%
9.5%
—

Under Armour, Inc. · UAA

11%
5.6%
-3.5%
2.6%
7.6%
6.0%
2.5%
1.7%
8.9%
4.8%
-0.3%
-25%
12%
1.0%
-6.1%
0.3%
1.3%
-11%
-2.9%
—

V.F. Corporation · VFC

9.2%
18%
19%
6.8%
2.8%
-2.9%
—
-7.3%
-0.4%
-3.3%
-17%
-7.0%
9.9%
8.0%
-3.4%
-4.9%
11%
10%
2.8%
—

Margin change · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Canada Goose Holdings Inc. · GOOS

—
—
—
+111.5 pp
−123.0 pp
—
−1.9 pp
+4.3 pp
0.0 pp
−7.0 pp
−26.6 pp
−116.0 pp
+118.2 pp
+32.8 pp
+7.8 pp
−37.2 pp
−7.1 pp
−4.8 pp
0.0 pp
—

Columbia Sportswear Company · COLM

—
—
—
−4.7 pp
−1.4 pp
−5.4 pp
−4.1 pp
−0.5 pp
−1.5 pp
−2.6 pp
−1.1 pp
−5.2 pp
−1.6 pp
+1.8 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.3 pp
−5.0 pp
−1.6 pp
−0.6 pp
—

FIGS, Inc. · FIGS

—
—
—
+39.4 pp
−1.6 pp
−10.6 pp
−9.8 pp
−2.9 pp
−1.7 pp
+7.6 pp
−2.3 pp
−3.7 pp
−13.2 pp
−3.9 pp
−0.6 pp
+5.4 pp
+12.6 pp
+3.4 pp
+3.0 pp
—

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. · GIII

—
—
—
—
−2.9 pp
−6.6 pp
−43.2 pp
−5.4 pp
−0.4 pp
+8.8 pp
+40.3 pp
−0.3 pp
+1.6 pp
−2.5 pp
+2.4 pp
−0.7 pp
−3.7 pp
−3.9 pp
−12.3 pp
+14.4 pp

Gildan Activewear Inc. · GIL

—
—
—
—
−2.0 pp
−4.6 pp
−9.7 pp
−2.7 pp
+2.3 pp
−2.7 pp
+2.2 pp
−1.8 pp
0.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+3.1 pp
+5.3 pp
−0.6 pp
−12.6 pp
−18.3 pp
—

Kontoor Brands, Inc. · KTB

—
—
—
+7.3 pp
−0.8 pp
+1.5 pp
−1.7 pp
−4.2 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.8 pp
+2.1 pp
+1.6 pp
+0.8 pp
−6.0 pp
−0.5 pp
−7.2 pp
—
+4.5 pp
+2.8 pp

Levi Strauss & Co. · LEVI

—
—
—
—
−1.3 pp
−2.5 pp
−5.4 pp
−4.5 pp
−10.8 pp
+0.7 pp
−9.3 pp
+0.8 pp
0.0 pp
+2.6 pp
+12.5 pp
+6.0 pp
+8.5 pp
0.0 pp
−1.1 pp
+0.3 pp

Oxford Industries, Inc. · OXM

—
—
—
—
0.0 pp
−3.7 pp
−0.2 pp
−2.4 pp
−4.6 pp
−4.3 pp
−30.6 pp
−5.9 pp
−3.6 pp
−6.4 pp
+25.3 pp
−4.0 pp
−6.2 pp
−25.7 pp
−7.3 pp
−3.5 pp

PVH Corp. · PVH

—
—
—
—
−3.8 pp
−25.6 pp
+2.7 pp
−0.7 pp
−1.8 pp
+19.1 pp
—
+1.3 pp
+1.9 pp
−1.6 pp
—
−27.2 pp
−2.3 pp
−0.2 pp
+1.0 pp
+22.8 pp

Ralph Lauren Corporation · RL

—
—
—
−13.6 pp
−4.9 pp
−2.8 pp
—
+0.2 pp
−0.7 pp
+3.3 pp
—
+11.2 pp
−0.7 pp
+1.8 pp
+2.2 pp
+2.1 pp
+1.8 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.4 pp
—

Under Armour, Inc. · UAA

—
—
—
−6.4 pp
−3.5 pp
+0.4 pp
+6.0 pp
−0.9 pp
+1.3 pp
−1.2 pp
−2.8 pp
−27.0 pp
+3.5 pp
−3.8 pp
−5.8 pp
+25.6 pp
−11.1 pp
−12.3 pp
+3.2 pp
—

V.F. Corporation · VFC

—
—
—
—
−6.4 pp
−20.4 pp
—
−14.1 pp
−3.2 pp
−0.4 pp
—
+0.3 pp
+10.3 pp
+11.3 pp
+13.2 pp
+2.1 pp
+1.3 pp
+2.1 pp
+6.2 pp
—
07 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Ralph Lauren Corporation has the highest Net profit among the 16 Apparel Manufacturing companies compared here, at $942 million. Levi Strauss & Co. is next at $554 million. Levi Strauss & Co. has the highest Profit growth at 31%, so level and change sit with different companies. 9 of 16 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Ralph Lauren Corporation leads with $942 million of TTM profit, 70% above Levi Strauss & Co.. Levi Strauss & Co. shows 31% growth from a $554 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderRalph Lauren Corporation · $942 million
Gap70% versus #2 · Levi Strauss & Co.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage9/16 companies · 285 observations

Investor read: Ralph Lauren Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Ralph Lauren Corporation RL$942M
2Levi Strauss & Co. LEVI$554M
3PVH Corp. PVH$158M
4G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. GIII$127M
5FIGS, Inc. FIGS$41M
Profit growthfastest growers
1Levi Strauss & Co. LEVI31%
2Ralph Lauren Corporation RL27%
3G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. GIII-35%
4Oxford Industries, Inc. OXM-148%
Net profit · company comparison
9/16 level · 4/16 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Ralph Lauren Corporation RL$152M18%Mar 2026
Levi Strauss & Co. LEVI$95M19%Jun 2026
PVH Corp. PVH$88M-201%Jun 2026
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. GIII$67M738%Jun 2026
Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. ZGN$62M3.3%Dec 2025
Kontoor Brands, Inc. KTB$61M-18%Jun 2026
Columbia Sportswear Company COLM$34M-19%Jun 2026
Canada Goose Holdings Inc. GOOS$33M18%Jun 2026
Oxford Industries, Inc. OXM$15M-42%Jun 2026
FIGS, Inc. FIGS$6M850%Mar 2026
Superior Group of Companies, Inc. SGC$1M50%Mar 2026
Lakeland Industries, Inc. LAKE$0M-300%Jun 2026
JX Luxventure Group Inc. JXG$-13M-33%Dec 2025
Under Armour, Inc. UAA$-43M-111%Mar 2026
Gildan Activewear Inc. GIL$-55M-165%Jun 2026
V.F. Corporation VFC$-119M78%Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 16 companies with a series here. The remaining 4 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Canada Goose Holdings Inc. · GOOS

$10M
—
$151M
$-9M
$-64M
$5M
$138M
$-10M
$-85M
$4M
$8M
$-74M
$6M
$144M
$28M
$-126M
$-17M
$138M
$33M
—

Columbia Sportswear Company · COLM

$101M
$157M
$67M
$7M
$112M
$126M
$46M
$8M
$104M
$93M
$42M
$-12M
$90M
$103M
$42M
$-10M
$52M
$93M
$34M
—

Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. · ZGN

—
$-160M
—
$21M
—
$44M
—
$52M
—
$84M
—
$31M
—
$60M
—
$48M
—
$62M
—
—

FIGS, Inc. · FIGS

$7M
$13M
$9M
$5M
$4M
$3M
$2M
$5M
$6M
$10M
$1M
$1M
$-2M
$2M
$0M
$7M
$9M
$19M
$6M
—

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. · GIII

$19M
$106M
$48M
$31M
$36M
$61M
$-262M
$3M
$16M
$127M
$28M
$6M
$24M
$115M
$49M
$8M
$11M
$81M
$-32M
$67M

Gildan Activewear Inc. · GIL

$146M
$188M
$174M
$146M
$158M
$153M
$84M
$98M
$155M
$127M
$79M
$58M
$131M
$132M
$85M
$138M
$120M
$51M
$-55M
—

Kontoor Brands, Inc. · KTB

$63M
$44M
$81M
$62M
$51M
$52M
$66M
$36M
$60M
$69M
$60M
$77M
$103M
$87M
$10M
$74M
$35M
—
$126M
$61M

Levi Strauss & Co. · LEVI

$193M
$153M
$196M
$50M
$173M
$151M
$115M
$-2M
$10M
$127M
$-10M
$17M
$23M
$180M
$140M
$80M
$122M
$160M
$177M
$95M

PVH Corp. · PVH

$182M
$280M
$391M
$133M
$115M
$-187M
$139M
$136M
$94M
$162M
$272M
$151M
$158M
$132M
$157M
$-45M
$224M
$4M
$-158M
$88M

Ralph Lauren Corporation · RL

$193M
$218M
—
$24M
$123M
$151M
—
$32M
$132M
$277M
$91M
$169M
$148M
$297M
$129M
$220M
$208M
$362M
$152M
—

Under Armour, Inc. · UAA

$113M
$110M
$-60M
$8M
$87M
$122M
$171M
$10M
$105M
$111M
$7M
$-305M
$170M
$1M
$-67M
$-3M
$-19M
$-431M
$-43M
—

V.F. Corporation · VFC

$154M
$464M
$518M
$80M
$-56M
$-118M
—
$-215M
$-57M
$-92M
$-412M
$-152M
$203M
$169M
$-150M
$-116M
$190M
$301M
$-119M
—

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 16 companies with a series here. The remaining 4 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Canada Goose Holdings Inc. · GOOS

—
—
—
—
-740%
—
-8.6%
—
—
-20%
-94%
—
—
3,500%
250%
—
-383%
-4.2%
18%
—

Columbia Sportswear Company · COLM

—
—
—
-83%
11%
-20%
-31%
14%
-7.1%
-26%
-8.7%
-250%
-13%
11%
0.0%
—
-42%
-9.7%
-19%
—

Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. · ZGN

—
-490%
—
-34%
—
—
—
148%
—
91%
—
-40%
—
-29%
—
55%
—
3.3%
—
—

FIGS, Inc. · FIGS

—
—
—
—
-43%
-77%
-78%
0.0%
50%
233%
-50%
-80%
-133%
-80%
-100%
600%
—
850%
—
—

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. · GIII

—
—
—
—
89%
-42%
-646%
-90%
-56%
108%
—
100%
50%
-9.5%
75%
33%
-54%
-30%
-165%
738%

Gildan Activewear Inc. · GIL

—
—
—
—
8.2%
-19%
-52%
-33%
-1.9%
-17%
-6.0%
-41%
-15%
3.9%
7.6%
138%
-8.4%
-61%
-165%
—

Kontoor Brands, Inc. · KTB

—
—
—
158%
-19%
18%
-19%
-42%
18%
33%
-9.1%
114%
72%
26%
-83%
-3.9%
-66%
—
1,160%
-18%

Levi Strauss & Co. · LEVI

—
—
—
—
-10%
-1.3%
-41%
-104%
-94%
-16%
-109%
—
130%
42%
—
371%
430%
-11%
26%
19%

PVH Corp. · PVH

—
—
—
—
-37%
-167%
-64%
2.3%
-18%
—
96%
11%
68%
-19%
-42%
-130%
42%
-97%
-201%
—

Ralph Lauren Corporation · RL

—
—
—
-85%
-36%
-31%
—
33%
7.3%
83%
—
428%
12%
7.2%
42%
30%
41%
22%
18%
—

Under Armour, Inc. · UAA

—
—
—
-86%
-23%
11%
—
25%
21%
-9.0%
-96%
-3,150%
62%
-99%
-1,057%
—
-111%
—
—
—

V.F. Corporation · VFC

—
—
—
—
-136%
-125%
—
-369%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-6.4%
78%
—
—
08 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Kontoor Brands, Inc. has the highest ROCE among the 16 Apparel Manufacturing companies compared here, at 5.4%. G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. is next at 4.1%. Canada Goose Holdings Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +5.6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 16 of 16 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Kontoor Brands, Inc. leads ROCE at 5.4%, 1.3 percentage points above G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.. Canada Goose Holdings Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +5.6 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderKontoor Brands, Inc. · 5.4%
Gap31.7% versus #2 · G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage16/16 companies · 300 observations

Investor read: Kontoor Brands, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Kontoor Brands, Inc. KTB5.4%
2G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. GIII4.1%
3Ralph Lauren Corporation RL3.5%
4Gildan Activewear Inc. GIL3.2%
5Levi Strauss & Co. LEVI2.6%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Canada Goose Holdings Inc. GOOS+5.6 pp
2PVH Corp. PVH+5.3 pp
3Lakeland Industries, Inc. LAKE+4.1 pp
4G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. GIII+3.7 pp
5Columbia Sportswear Company COLM+2.6 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
16/16 level · 16/16 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Kontoor Brands, Inc. KTB5.4%+0.8 ppJun 2026
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. GIII4.1%+3.7 ppJun 2026
Ralph Lauren Corporation RL3.5%+0.4 ppMar 2026
Gildan Activewear Inc. GIL3.2%−3.0 ppJun 2026
Levi Strauss & Co. LEVI2.6%+0.2 ppJun 2026
Oxford Industries, Inc. OXM2.1%−1.5 ppJun 2026
Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. ZGN1.9%−0.6 ppDec 2025
Columbia Sportswear Company COLM1.5%+2.6 ppJun 2026
PVH Corp. PVH1.4%+5.3 ppJun 2026
Lakeland Industries, Inc. LAKE1.3%+4.1 ppJun 2026
FIGS, Inc. FIGS1.0%+1.0 ppMar 2026
Superior Group of Companies, Inc. SGC0.6%+0.5 ppMar 2026
Under Armour, Inc. UAA-1.1%+1.0 ppMar 2026
V.F. Corporation VFC-1.3%0.0 ppJun 2026
Canada Goose Holdings Inc. GOOS-8.4%+5.6 ppJun 2026
JX Luxventure Group Inc. JXG-28%−30.5 ppDec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 16 companies with a series here. The remaining 4 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Canada Goose Holdings Inc. · GOOS

1.2%
—
17%
0.3%
-7.4%
2.0%
16%
1.5%
-9.2%
0.2%
1.9%
-8.7%
0.1%
17%
4.5%
-14%
-1.5%
16%
4.9%
-8.4%

Columbia Sportswear Company · COLM

6.0%
9.1%
3.7%
0.4%
6.5%
6.6%
2.5%
0.3%
6.0%
4.9%
1.9%
-1.1%
5.0%
6.0%
2.1%
-1.1%
3.1%
5.3%
2.0%
1.5%

Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. · ZGN

-4.0%
-4.0%
2.3%
2.3%
2.0%
2.0%
3.5%
3.5%
2.8%
2.8%
2.1%
2.1%
2.5%
2.5%
1.6%
1.6%
1.9%
1.9%
—
—

FIGS, Inc. · FIGS

6.5%
32%
6.9%
3.8%
4.2%
2.0%
1.1%
2.0%
2.9%
3.8%
0.1%
0.4%
-2.1%
2.1%
0.0%
2.2%
2.1%
4.1%
1.0%
—

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. · GIII

—
7.6%
3.2%
2.5%
1.4%
4.0%
-13%
0.7%
1.4%
7.9%
2.1%
0.6%
2.0%
7.7%
3.5%
0.4%
0.8%
5.3%
-1.4%
4.1%

Gildan Activewear Inc. · GIL

—
7.8%
6.6%
5.8%
6.5%
6.5%
3.4%
4.4%
6.2%
5.5%
3.5%
4.7%
6.7%
6.3%
4.1%
6.2%
6.5%
1.8%
0.0%
3.2%

Kontoor Brands, Inc. · KTB

7.4%
6.2%
9.9%
8.2%
6.7%
7.6%
8.1%
5.5%
7.2%
6.3%
6.7%
6.1%
8.0%
6.7%
2.5%
4.6%
3.8%
—
7.5%
5.4%

Levi Strauss & Co. · LEVI

—
4.6%
5.9%
1.9%
4.8%
3.4%
3.9%
0.2%
0.9%
3.7%
0.0%
0.5%
0.8%
5.6%
4.4%
2.4%
3.7%
6.4%
4.3%
2.6%

PVH Corp. · PVH

—
3.6%
2.2%
2.1%
1.8%
-2.3%
3.2%
2.1%
1.6%
2.7%
4.1%
2.3%
2.1%
2.2%
2.5%
-3.9%
1.5%
2.0%
2.8%
1.4%

Ralph Lauren Corporation · RL

4.2%
4.7%
—
0.6%
3.2%
3.8%
—
0.7%
3.2%
6.0%
2.1%
4.0%
3.6%
7.7%
3.1%
5.2%
4.8%
8.8%
3.5%
—

Under Armour, Inc. · UAA

5.0%
2.4%
-1.3%
1.0%
3.5%
2.8%
1.1%
0.7%
4.1%
2.1%
-0.1%
-9.2%
5.1%
0.4%
-2.1%
0.1%
0.5%
-5.1%
-1.1%
—

V.F. Corporation · VFC

—
5.2%
6.3%
1.8%
0.6%
-1.0%
—
-1.6%
-0.1%
-1.0%
-4.0%
-1.4%
3.3%
2.8%
-1.0%
-1.3%
4.4%
4.0%
0.9%
-1.3%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 16 companies with a series here. The remaining 4 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Canada Goose Holdings Inc. · GOOS

—
—
—
—
−8.6 pp
—
−1.1 pp
+1.2 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.8 pp
−14.1 pp
−10.2 pp
+9.3 pp
+16.9 pp
+2.6 pp
−5.3 pp
−1.6 pp
−1.5 pp
+0.4 pp
+5.6 pp

Columbia Sportswear Company · COLM

—
—
—
—
+0.5 pp
−2.5 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.5 pp
−1.7 pp
−0.6 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.0 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.2 pp
0.0 pp
−1.9 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.1 pp
+2.6 pp

Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. · ZGN

—
—
—
—
+6.0 pp
+6.0 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.8 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.4 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.6 pp
—
—

FIGS, Inc. · FIGS

—
—
—
—
−2.3 pp
−30.4 pp
−5.8 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.3 pp
+1.8 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.6 pp
−5.0 pp
−1.7 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.8 pp
+4.2 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
—

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. · GIII

—
—
—
—
—
−3.6 pp
−16.6 pp
−1.8 pp
0.0 pp
+3.9 pp
+15.5 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.2 pp
+1.4 pp
−0.2 pp
−1.2 pp
−2.4 pp
−4.9 pp
+3.7 pp

Gildan Activewear Inc. · GIL

—
—
—
—
—
−1.3 pp
−3.2 pp
−1.4 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.5 pp
−0.2 pp
−4.5 pp
−4.1 pp
−3.0 pp

Kontoor Brands, Inc. · KTB

—
—
—
—
−0.7 pp
+1.4 pp
−1.8 pp
−2.7 pp
+0.5 pp
−1.3 pp
−1.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.4 pp
−4.2 pp
−1.5 pp
−4.2 pp
—
+5.0 pp
+0.8 pp

Levi Strauss & Co. · LEVI

—
—
—
—
—
−1.2 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.7 pp
−3.9 pp
+0.3 pp
−3.9 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.9 pp
+4.4 pp
+1.9 pp
+2.9 pp
+0.8 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.2 pp

PVH Corp. · PVH

—
—
—
—
—
−5.9 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
−0.2 pp
+5.0 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
−1.6 pp
−6.2 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.3 pp
+5.3 pp

Ralph Lauren Corporation · RL

—
—
—
—
−1.0 pp
−0.9 pp
—
+0.1 pp
0.0 pp
+2.2 pp
—
+3.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.4 pp
—

Under Armour, Inc. · UAA

—
—
—
—
−1.5 pp
+0.4 pp
+2.4 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.7 pp
−1.2 pp
−9.9 pp
+1.0 pp
−1.7 pp
−2.0 pp
+9.3 pp
−4.6 pp
−5.5 pp
+1.0 pp
—

V.F. Corporation · VFC

—
—
—
—
—
−6.2 pp
—
−3.4 pp
−0.7 pp
0.0 pp
—
+0.2 pp
+3.4 pp
+3.8 pp
+3.0 pp
+0.1 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.9 pp
0.0 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

PVH Corp. has the lowest PEG among the 16 Apparel Manufacturing companies compared here, at 0.18×. Levi Strauss & Co. is next at 0.24×. Oxford Industries, Inc. has the lowest P/E at 9.99×, so level and change sit with different companies. 6 of 16 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: PVH Corp. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.18×, 25% below Levi Strauss & Co.. Only 6 of 16 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderPVH Corp. · 0.18×
Gap25% versus #2 · Levi Strauss & Co.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/16 companies · 25 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
1PVH Corp. PVH0.2
2Levi Strauss & Co. LEVI0.2
3G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. GIII0.5
4Superior Group of Companies, Inc. SGC0.7
5Ralph Lauren Corporation RL0.7
P/Elowest P/E
1Oxford Industries, Inc. OXM10.0
2G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. GIII11.0
3Kontoor Brands, Inc. KTB13.7
4Levi Strauss & Co. LEVI14.3
5Columbia Sportswear Company COLM16.1
Valuation · company comparison
6/16 level · 16/16 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
Kontoor Brands, Inc. KTB2.413.7Jun 2026
FIGS, Inc. FIGS1.267.1Mar 2026
Ralph Lauren Corporation RL0.721.7Mar 2026
Superior Group of Companies, Inc. SGC0.717.8Mar 2026
Gildan Activewear Inc. GIL0.6101.6Jun 2026
Canada Goose Holdings Inc. GOOS0.525.0Jun 2026
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. GIII0.511.0Jun 2026
Lakeland Industries, Inc. LAKE0.490.8Jun 2026
Levi Strauss & Co. LEVI0.214.3Jun 2026
Oxford Industries, Inc. OXM0.210.0Jun 2026
PVH Corp. PVH0.229.0Jun 2026
V.F. Corporation VFC—24.9Jun 2026
Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. ZGN—23.0Dec 2025
Columbia Sportswear Company COLM—16.1Jun 2026
Under Armour, Inc. UAA—31.1Mar 2026
JX Luxventure Group Inc. JXG—19.3Dec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

Canada Goose Holdings Inc. · GOOS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.5
—
—
—
—
—
—

FIGS, Inc. · FIGS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.2
1.2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. · GIII

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.6
0.5
—
—
—
—

Gildan Activewear Inc. · GIL

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.5
0.6
—
—
—

Kontoor Brands, Inc. · KTB

—
—
—
—
—
—
1.1
—
—
—
—
0.9
1.0
2.4
—
2.4
—
—
—
—

Lakeland Industries, Inc. · LAKE

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

Levi Strauss & Co. · LEVI

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.2

Oxford Industries, Inc. · OXM

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.2
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.2
—
—
—
—
—

PVH Corp. · PVH

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
—
—
—
0.2
—
—
—
—
—
—

Ralph Lauren Corporation · RL

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.4
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.7
—

Superior Group of Companies, Inc. · SGC

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.7
—
—
—
—
0.7
—

P/E · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 16 companies with a series here. The remaining 4 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Canada Goose Holdings Inc. · GOOS

87.8
—
47.3
37.7
28.1
28.1
38.4
37.7
47.2
39.1
28.6
30.5
28.6
19.7
12.2
33.2
75.4
92.3
63.8
25.0

Columbia Sportswear Company · COLM

21.7
18.3
16.3
14.2
12.6
17.7
19.3
16.4
16.1
19.5
19.8
21.0
23.0
22.0
19.4
15.6
15.8
17.0
17.5
16.1

Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. · ZGN

—
—
—
—
—
46.5
45.6
34.2
32.1
21.8
31.2
28.3
25.6
26.5
20.4
19.6
21.5
23.0
—
—

FIGS, Inc. · FIGS

—
—
—
53.6
51.6
61.2
77.4
118.1
73.8
57.9
45.3
53.3
114.0
309.5
459.0
141.0
66.9
59.8
67.1
—

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. · GIII

—
8.5
6.7
6.4
4.9
5.4
—
—
—
—
8.0
7.4
6.9
8.0
7.4
5.8
5.8
8.1
19.4
11.0

Gildan Activewear Inc. · GIL

—
14.7
13.8
11.0
8.4
8.4
9.4
12.3
11.9
10.7
12.5
15.5
18.7
19.1
17.4
15.5
18.4
24.4
32.0
101.6

Kontoor Brands, Inc. · KTB

14.7
15.1
11.0
7.4
8.0
9.3
11.7
11.5
11.7
15.4
15.0
15.4
18.2
19.6
15.5
14.6
20.3
—
14.9
13.7

Levi Strauss & Co. · LEVI

—
20.2
15.3
12.7
12.9
11.4
14.5
12.3
20.6
24.8
58.7
63.3
51.3
33.6
20.2
17.0
14.7
15.2
14.1
14.3

PVH Corp. · PVH

—
15.7
7.0
5.3
4.7
8.3
29.0
27.2
30.0
8.5
11.3
10.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.9
8.0
11.7
119.9
29.0

Ralph Lauren Corporation · RL

21.8
16.8
—
13.9
12.0
11.8
—
15.4
15.8
16.4
19.3
16.9
18.7
20.9
18.6
22.1
23.1
24.4
21.7
—

Under Armour, Inc. · UAA

21.5
27.5
36.2
23.1
21.5
29.0
11.7
8.4
7.6
10.0
14.2
—
—
—
—
31.1
—
—
—
—

V.F. Corporation · VFC

—
21.9
20.4
15.8
17.0
27.4
—
75.1
63.4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
63.7
32.3
25.6
24.9
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Apparel Manufacturing comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 2 of the 16 companies report on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so their ranks are marked stale. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 2 companies have older fundamental reporting dates than the sector’s freshest reporters; their ranks carry a stale marker.
11 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 16 Apparel Manufacturing companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Apparel Manufacturing company comparison FAQs

These 22 answers restate the Apparel Manufacturing comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 16 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Apparel Manufacturing sector outperforming S&P 500?

Apparel Manufacturing has outperformed S&P 500 by 10.6% over 52 weeks and 5.6% over 13 weeks. 8 of 16 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 5 of 16 beat the sector itself.

Which Apparel Manufacturing company is largest by revenue?

PVH Corp. leads with revenue of $8,991 million, based on 9 of 16 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Which Apparel Manufacturing company is growing fastest?

FIGS, Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 18.9%, across 9 of 16 comparable companies.

Which Apparel Manufacturing company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. ranks first at 62.5/100 with 79.3% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Apparel Manufacturing company has the lowest comparable PEG?

PVH Corp. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.18, among 6 of 16 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Apparel Manufacturing comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Which Apparel Manufacturing company is the biggest?

PVH Corp. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $8,991 million, ahead of Ralph Lauren Corporation at $8,115 million. That covers 9 of 16 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.

Which Apparel Manufacturing company has the best profit margins?

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. has the highest operating margin at 15.9%, from 14 of 16 comparable companies. PVH Corp. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +22.8 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Apparel Manufacturing company makes the most profit?

Ralph Lauren Corporation earns the most, at $942 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 9 of 16 comparable companies. Levi Strauss & Co. has the fastest profit growth at 31%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Apparel Manufacturing company earns the highest return on capital?

Kontoor Brands, Inc. leads on return on capital employed at 5.4%, across 16 of 16 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Apparel Manufacturing stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — PVH Corp. screens cheapest at 0.18×. Only 6 of 16 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Apparel Manufacturing sector beating the market?

Apparel Manufacturing has outperformed S&P 500 by 10.6% over the last 52 weeks and 5.6% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 8 of 16 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Apparel Manufacturing stock has the strongest price momentum?

Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Apparel Manufacturing company scores highest for research priority?

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. scores 62.5 out of 100 with 79.3% evidence confidence, from 16.4 points on growth and earnings, 16.3 on capital efficiency, 14.7 on valuation and 15.1 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Apparel Manufacturing companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 16 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Apparel Manufacturing sector?

The 16 Apparel Manufacturing companies on this page carry $72,222 million of combined market value. Ralph Lauren Corporation is the largest at $22,492 million, about 31% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.

What is the Apparel Manufacturing sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 16 Apparel Manufacturing companies on this page is 23×, measured on the 16 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.

How is the Apparel Manufacturing sector performing?

8 of the 16 covered Apparel Manufacturing companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 10.6% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.

How many Apparel Manufacturing stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 16 listed Apparel Manufacturing companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI