UTI Asset Management Company share price today

UTI Asset Management Company Ltd's share price was ₹820.05 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been falling for 47 weeks. That is 14.6% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the NIFTY 500, and it has been behind for 3 weeks running.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today UTI Asset Management Company Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹810 and ₹1,209, and at that close it sat 2% of the way up from that low.

Over the last 6.1 years the share price moved +63% while the NIFTY 500 moved +124%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 16 October 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

One change stood out: foreign funds (FIIs) cut their stake for 6 quarters in a row.

1. Foreign funds (FIIs) cut their stake for 6 quarters in a row

   From 7.9% to 6.7% of the company by the September 2026 quarter.

UTI Asset Management Company paid ₹40 a share in regular dividends in the 12 months to 5 November 2026 (1 payment), a yield of 4.88% at the ₹820.05 close on 4 November 2026. The last was a dividend of ₹40 a share, ex-date 14 July 2026.

UTI Asset Management Company dividends since 1 April 2021

Amounts as the company declared them on the NSE. A dividend goes to whoever owns the shares before the ex-date. The record date is the same day as the ex-date for every payment here.

Yes. UTI Asset Management Company Ltd paid out 127% of its profit as dividends in FY26, and it paid a dividend in each of its last 13 reported years.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

For July to September 2026 (the quarter ended 30 September 2026), UTI Asset Management Company reported total income of ₹415 crore, down 1.0% from ₹419 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹132 crore, up 0.0% from ₹132 crore.

UTI Asset Management Company results: July to September 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for October to December 2026, are due by 14 February 2027: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

UTI Asset Management Company's management discussed these results on a call held on 27 October 2026; what it said is further down this page.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 September 2026). Income and profit in ₹ crore.

UTI Asset Management Company closed at ₹820.05 on 4 November 2026, down 32.2% from ₹1,209.00 a year earlier (7 November 2025) and down 26.2% over five years. Its highest weekly close since October 2020 was ₹1,431.60 on 18 July 2025.

UTI Asset Management Company share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 4 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

321 weekly closes from 16 October 2020 to 4 November 2026.

4 Nov 2026: UTI Asset Management Company closed at ₹820.05, up 1.2% on the week and down 7.2% on the month. 27 Oct 2026: UTI Asset Management Company held its results call for July to September 2026. Management guided: Standalone employee cost around ₹95 crore per quarter and consol around ₹130 crore per quarter through FY27.

Earlier

• Results for July to September 2026: Total income down 1.0% and profit up 0.0% on a year earlier.
• 14 Jul 2026: ex-date for a dividend of ₹40 a share.

On the call for July to September 2026, held on 27 October 2026, UTI Asset Management Company's management guided: Standalone employee cost around ₹95 crore per quarter and consol around ₹130 crore per quarter through FY27.

“The good part about passive strategies is that whatever we earn at the top line is directly added to the bottom line, because the teams and processes have already been set up.”Management, on the call for July to September 2026

What management guided

• SIF Classic Hybrid Long-Short launch in October to December 2026, first of 5-6 allowed strategies.
• UTI International 2 new fund launches by end Q3 to January to March 2027.
• Dividend payout 90-95% of profit to continue with no special distribution planned.

Management’s own plans and goals, from our notes of the call. A plan is not a result.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for July to September 2026, 27 October 2026.

When UTI Asset Management Company reports October to December 2026, these are the 2 checks that show whether the story is still on course. First: New-SIP volume share sustaining at flagged level with closure staying below industry mark and ticket firm.

UTI Asset Management Company is on 2 of our India lists: 52 week high & low and Dividend stocks.

UTI Asset Management Company Ltd earned ₹132 Cr of net profit in the Sep 2026 quarter, +0.0% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹472 Cr. Over 14 years profit has grown 8.7% a year on average. That is 31.8% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹132 Cr.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹472 Cr (−41.9% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed −1.0% on a year earlier and the margin moved +0.3 percentage points. Sales did the work, and the margin was about flat.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed −38.8% and revenue +8.3%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

UTI Asset Management Company Ltd reported ₹415 Cr of income in the Sep 2026 quarter, −1.0% on the same quarter a year earlier. Over 14 years it has grown 9.1% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,705 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,906 Cr.

For a bank, revenue is everything it earns: interest on its loans plus fees and other income.

FY26 revenue was ₹1,705 Cr, −7.9% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +8.3% on average, against 9.1% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing at about the same pace as its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +8.3%, against −0.7% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating); profit over the last 12 months grew −22.5%, against −25.4% a year (stabilising).

UTI Asset Management Company Ltd's net margin was 31.8% in the Sep 2026 quarter, 0.3 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 years it has been between 27.7% and 46.2%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Net margin is what the bank keeps from every ₹100 of revenue after every cost, provision for bad loans and tax. It is the clearest single margin we can read for a lender.

Why: the net margin move is clear, but the cost details behind it are not in our data, so we show the move without guessing the reason.

UTI Asset Management Company Ltd does not report loan-quality figures this page can read, so this section says so rather than guess. No bad-loan figures are filed in a form this page can read, and none are guessed from the profit line. The income, margin and return sections carry what this business does report.

Gross NPA is the share of the loan book where repayments have stopped. Net NPA is what is left after the money the lender has already set aside for those loans. Falling is good; rising is a warning.

Why: loan quality drives a lender, but its details (new bad loans, recoveries, money set aside) are not in our data for this company. The sections around this one carry what we can back up.

UTI Asset Management Company Ltd's revenue was ₹1,705 Cr in FY26, −7.9% on the year before, so the loan book is not growing. The latest quarter was −1.0% on a year earlier. The net margin on that income is 31.8%, +0.3 percentage points on a year ago.

We read the loan book through revenue: when the book grows, revenue grows with it. It is only a rough guide, because interest-rate changes and fee swings can move it a few points in any year.

Interest income stands in for the size of the loan book; changes in interest rates can move it a few points in any year.

In short: a lender grows well when its loan book grows, its margin stays steady and its loans stay clean. Gross NPA is the loan-quality figure this page uses.

UTI Asset Management Company Ltd's P/BV is 2.4×, near the low end of its own history: it has been lower only 5% of the time. Its usual P/BV (the middle reading) is 2.9×, over 5.8 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

For a bank or lender we compare the price with book value, the net worth on its balance sheet. P/BV is how many rupees the market pays for each ₹1 of that net worth. Below 1× means the market values it at less than its net worth.

Why the multiple is low: this lender earns about 10% a year on its equity. A lender that earns less on its net worth is valued lower for each rupee of it, and that gap usually closes only if returns improve.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year book value grew while the price moved −32.2%. Price and book value moved together, so the multiple stayed in its range.

Where the price move came from: over 5 years the price moved −5.9% a year; about +4.9% a year came from book-value growth and about −10.8 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less). The split is approximate (price return minus book-value growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the book value trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

The PEG ratio and its quarterly curve, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 42% on reported income across 16 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

UTI Asset Management Company Ltd's business is turning around. EPS growth has swung from −35.8% at its low to −18.6%, rising from a low 1 quarters ago. This is based on 9 quarters of 3 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: a turn in growth is often where a bigger change starts. The lines say a turn is forming, so the question is whether the next quarters confirm it.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

We do not have a clean yearly return-on-equity history for UTI Asset Management Company Ltd. For an insurer in particular, the usual bank ratios do not fit, so this page does not force them or estimate a series. The revenue, margin and ownership sections show what this company does report.

Two numbers usually rate a lender: ROE, what it earns on shareholders’ money, and ROA, what it earns on all its assets.

The quarterly return-on-equity and return-on-assets curves, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 42% on reported income across 16 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

For a bank, borrowing is the raw material of the business, not a warning sign: it borrows money in order to lend it out. Its safety is read through its returns and its loans. Its safety is read from the bad-loan figures and the return on equity instead.

For a manufacturer, debt is a claim on its profits. For a lender it is the stock it trades in, so the usual debt-to-equity test would mislead and is not used here.

Domestic institutions cut their stake in UTI Asset Management Company Ltd by 1.1 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Domestic institutions now own 59.1% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −0.5 points over the same period, to 6.7%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Why the owners changed: domestic institutions drove it (−1.1 points), together with foreign institutions (−0.5 points). They reduced their stake.

For UTI Asset Management Company Ltd, the Z-score is not used, because it was built for manufacturers, not lenders. For a lender, safety is read from its capital and bad-loan figures instead.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

40.4 out of 100, rank 4 of 6 in Finance - AMC, with 60% of the evidence available.

UTI Asset Management Company Ltd scores 40.4 out of 100 against the 6 companies it is compared with in Finance - AMC, ranking 4. The valuation scores well, but earnings are not improving yet, so the business does not back up the low multiple so far.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 10.7 + 8.3 + 13.1 + 8.3 = 40.4. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if ROA turns down or gross NPA rises while the share price lags its sector.

UTI Asset Management Company ranks 4 of 6 Finance - AMC companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 40.4 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. Financial companies use P/BV÷ROE and asset quality; PEG, industrial OPM and ROCE are excluded. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Finance - AMC, all 6 compared on one page.

UTI Asset Management Company is the 5th largest of 6 Finance - AMC companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: ICICI Prudential Asset Management Co, HDFC Asset Management Company, Nippon Life India Asset Management and Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC. Just below it: Canara Robeco Asset Management Company.

Finance - AMC companies close in size

1. ICICI Prudential Asset Management Co Ltd ₹1,33,791 crore
2. HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd ₹1,13,489 crore
3. Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd ₹57,924 crore
4. Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Ltd ₹23,312 crore
5. UTI Asset Management Company Ltd ₹10,417 crore
6. Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd ₹4,115 crore

All 6 Finance - AMC companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

569. Cartrade Tech Ltd ₹10,646 crore · Platform - Others
570. Voltamp Transformers Ltd ₹10,472 crore · Capital Goods - Transformers
571. UTI Asset Management Company Ltd ₹10,417 crore
572. Ujjivan Small Finance Bank Ltd ₹10,368 crore · Banks - Small Finance
573. Mahanagar Gas Ltd ₹10,357 crore · Gas Distribution

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.