Voltamp Transformers Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Voltamp Transformers Ltd trades at ₹9,923, in a confirmed uptrend and 18 weeks into that stage. That is +9.8% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 63% of a 52-week range of ₹6,826 to ₹11,742. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (3 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 18 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹9,923 it trades +9.8% versus its 200-day average and sits at 63% of its 52-week range (₹6,826–₹11,742).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +1,265% while the NIFTY 500 moved +274% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (3 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-10) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Voltamp Transformers Ltd trades at 31.7× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (91st percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 16.9×, measured across 10.4 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 31.7× is at the pricey end of its own range (91st percentile), against a long-run median of 16.9× measured over 10.4 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −6.2% against a +16.4% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +44.8%/yr price move, ~+23.0%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+21.8 pp from the multiple (expanding); over 10y, of the +29.0%/yr price move, ~+20.6%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+8.4 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Voltamp Transformers Ltd reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — profit and EPS growth are shrinking (profit growth −2.8% latest against +65.3% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 23.7%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.

🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.

4-Factor Sector Score

43.5/100 — rank 8 of 12 in Capital Goods - Transformers · 100% evidence confidence

Voltamp Transformers Ltd scores 43.5 out of 100 against the 12 companies it is compared with in Capital Goods - Transformers, ranking 8. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 14.1 + 14.5 + 3.1 + 11.8 = 43.5. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Voltamp Transformers Ltd reported ₹544 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +28.3% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 14.4% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹2,154 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹2,274 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹2,154 Cr (+11.4% on the year), capping 10 years at 14.4% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹544 Cr, +28.3% year on year.

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +19.6% growth against the decade's 14.4% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +17.8% over the last 4 quarters against +14.9%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit −2.8% vs −2.9%/yr — stabilising.

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Voltamp Transformers Ltd's operating margin is 15.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, −2.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 3.0% to 20.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 15.0%, −2.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 3.0%–20.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −2.4 pp year on year while gross margin went −3.0 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Voltamp Transformers Ltd earned ₹91.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +13.7% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹305 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 21.4%. That is 16.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹80.0 Cr.

Jun 26 profit was ₹91.0 Cr, +13.7% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹305 Cr (−6.2%), and the 10-year compound rate is 21.4%.

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +28.3% and the margin −2.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +0.7% vs revenue +19.6%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 61% of Voltamp Transformers Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — most of the profit is real cash. In FY26 that was ₹140 Cr of operating cash against ₹305 Cr of profit. After ₹120 Cr of capital spending, ₹20.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹140 Cr against reported profit of ₹305 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹20.0 Cr after ₹120 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 61% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

🚨 Why conversion sits at 61%: the cash cycle tightened 37 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 5.1× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Voltamp Transformers Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 169 days in FY26, down from 206 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹198 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹2,154 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹5.9 Cr, so roughly ₹997 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 46 days, inventory at 126 days — roughly 4.1 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 169 days, tighter than FY21's 206.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 126 days to sell; customers pay about 46 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 3 days — netting out to the 169-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹2,154 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹5.9 Cr — so the 169-day loop keeps roughly ₹997 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹198 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹39.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹108 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Voltamp Transformers Ltd earns a ROCE of 24% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 6% in FY15. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +3.7 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 14.2% net margin on 1.07× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 24%, recovered from a FY15 trough of 6% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 14.2% net margin × 1.07× asset turns × 1.13× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 17.2% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 15.7% − 12.0% = a +3.7 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Positive but thin — value creation with little room for error.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Voltamp Transformers Ltd carries total debt of ₹1.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,792 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.00 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.00 in FY24 to 0.00 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Mar 26: total debt of ₹1.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,792 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.00. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.00 (FY24) to 0.00 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Domestic institutions added 9.6 points of Voltamp Transformers Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 33.9% of the company. Promoters moved −8.0 points over the same window, to 30.0%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: +9.6 points over 8 quarters to 33.9%; Promoters: −8.0 points over 8 quarters to 30.0%; Foreign institutions: −5.8 points over 8 quarters to 21.5%.

Why the register moved: rotation — foreign institutions −5.8 points against domestic institutions +9.6 points over 8 quarters, with promoters −8.0 points — one class of institutions handing the register to the other, not a verdict change by the people closest to the numbers.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Voltamp Transformers Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Frequently asked questions