Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-11
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-11

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd

STCINDIA
Trading

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup.

The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +2,522.1% against a −5.4% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery.

The price is in a downtrend (2 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 24th percentile of its own 5-year range. But the balance sheet is under water: net worth is negative, so shareholders sit behind everyone the company owes. What settles it: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first.

Price
₹113
−5.4% 1Y
P/E
14.0×
24th pctile
of its own 5-year range
Revenue (Mar 26)
₹0.0 Cr
Profit (Mar 26)
₹9.8 Cr
+209.2% YoY
ROCE
87%
FY26
Cash conversion
−20%
of profit, last 3 FY
Unverified figures: Some figures on this page come from a second financial-data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source — the two do not share enough overlapping reported history to compare. They are drawn, because they are the only evidence there is, and every section carrying one is marked unverified. PEG is the exception: the quarterly curve is not drawn at all. PEG asks what is being paid for growth — both sides of that division come from the source that could not be checked, so it is withheld instead of marked.
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd trades at ₹113, in a downtrend and 2 weeks into that stage. That is −6.7% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 29% of a 52-week range of ₹99 to ₹145. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (9 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 2 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹113 it trades −6.7% versus its 200-day average and sits at 29% of its 52-week range (₹99–₹145).

Sep 26: ₹113 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
−6.7% versus the 200-day line, week 2 of stage 4
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2S4S4S1₹231₹192₹153₹115₹76.0₹113₹121Sep 23Jun 24Mar 25Jan 26Sep 26
S2S4S4S1₹231₹192₹153₹115₹76.0₹113₹121Sep 23Mar 25Sep 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (554 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Mar 16Sep 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +30% while the NIFTY 500 moved +267% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (9 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-10) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd trades at 14.0× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 24% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 16.2×, measured across 4.6 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 14.0× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 24% of the time, against a long-run median of 16.2× measured over 4.6 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

One caveat before moving on: margins are the best this company has ever printed — cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. If profitability mean-reverts, today's multiple is higher than it looks.

P/E 14.0× vs a 16.2× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 4.6-year window; loss-period spikes above 44× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 24% of the time
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
47.1×₹13.337.4×₹10.027.8×₹6.718.1×₹3.38.4×₹0.0×14.00×₹8Feb 22Apr 23Jun 24Aug 25Sep 26
47.1×₹13.337.4×₹10.027.8×₹6.718.1×₹3.38.4×₹0.0×14.00×₹8Feb 22Jun 24Sep 26
P/E
14.0×
24th percentile of 5y

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +2,522.1% against a −5.4% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the −6.0%/yr price move, ~+19.0%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−25.0 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 9 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue −100.0% in FY22 Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn. Turnaround-year spikes shown pinned (▲).
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
50%328%9.9%226%−30%124%−71%22%−111%−80%%%−100%300%FY16FY21FY26
50%328%9.9%226%−30%124%−71%22%−111%−80%%%−100%300%FY16FY21FY26
Profit growth
Rising
latest +209.2% · span −100.0% to +100.0%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

The return-on-capital curve is not shown — net worth is negative, so a return on capital is not a meaningful number in any basis. This is a distressed balance sheet, and the stage is read from the growth curves alone.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Profit+2,492.0%+172.6%
EPS+2,522.1%+173.2%
Share price−5.4%−6.0%+1.7%−0.3%
Profit YoY (Mar 26)
+209.2%
latest quarter vs a year ago
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

42.5/100 — rank 26 of 52 in Trading · 67% evidence confidence

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd scores 42.5 out of 100 against the 52 companies it is compared with in Trading, ranking 26. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 19.6 + 5.6 + 11.9 + 5.4 = 42.5. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd reported ₹0.0 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹0.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹0.0 Cr. A multi-year compound rate is not shown because the annual history behind it is too short to compute one honestly.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹0.0 Cr (null on the year). The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹0.0 Cr, null year on year.

FY26 revenue ₹0.0 Cr (null YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
RevenueYoY growth
11.7k50%8.6k9.9%5.4k−30%2.3k−71%−870−111%₹ Cr%₹0−100%FY16FY21FY26
11.7k50%8.6k9.9%5.4k−30%2.3k−71%−870−111%₹ Cr%₹0−100%FY16FY21FY26
Mar 26: ₹0.0 Cr (null YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)
1.20.60.0−0.6−1.2₹ Cr₹0Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1.20.60.0−0.6−1.2₹ Cr₹0Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Acceleration check: TTM profit +2,520.0% vs +256.3%/yr — accelerating.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

A clean operating margin is not in our numbers for State Trading Corporation of India Ltd — its accounts do not report the operating-profit line this section reads, which is common for lenders and holding companies. The sections above and below carry the readings this company's filings do support.

This company's accounts do not report the operating-profit line this section reads — common for lenders and holding companies classified outside the financial bucket. The revenue and net-profit sections are the cleaner reads for State Trading Corporation of India Ltd.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −111.5 pp year on year while gross margin went +98.9 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.

FY23: 4,800.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 9-year window.
the widest a −37.0–4,800.0% band over 9 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
5,187%5,227%3,784%3,814%2,382%2,402%979%989%−424%−423%%%4,800%4,837%FY14FY18FY23
5,187%5,227%3,784%3,814%2,382%2,402%979%989%−424%−423%%%4,800%4,837%FY14FY18FY23
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd earned ₹9.8 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +209.2% year on year. It is the 2nd consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹648 Cr. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹3.2 Cr. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Mar 26 profit was ₹9.8 Cr, +209.2% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹648 Cr (+2,492.0%).

FY26 profit ₹648 Cr (+2,492.0% YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
7702,695%3261,958%−1181,221%−561483%−1.0k−254%₹ Cr%₹6482,492%FY16FY21FY26
7702,695%3261,958%−1181,221%−561483%−1.0k−254%₹ Cr%₹6482,492%FY16FY21FY26
Mar 26: ₹9.8 Cr (+209.2% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
2nd straight quarter of growth
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
6621,014%482703%302393%12383%−57−227%₹ Cr%₹10209.2%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
6621,014%482703%302393%12383%−57−227%₹ Cr%₹10209.2%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years −20% of State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹52.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹648 Cr of profit. After ₹0.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹52.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹52.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹648 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹52.0 Cr after ₹0.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is −20% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹52.0 Cr vs profit ₹648 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 11-year window, annual resolution. FY22 reflects an acquisition year — point shown clipped.
−20% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
1.6k898245−409−1.1k₹ Cr₹52₹648₹52FY16FY21FY26
1.6k898245−409−1.1k₹ Cr₹52₹648₹52FY16FY21FY26
FY26: CFO = 8% of profit (three-year rate −20%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash.
Conversion100%
163%−65%−292%−519%−747%%8%FY16FY21FY26
163%−65%−292%−519%−747%%8%FY16FY21FY26

🚨 Why conversion sits at −20%: the cash cycle tightened 5,65,853 days between FY17 and FY23 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs −5,65,761 days in FY23, down from 92 days in FY17. Capital spending ran ₹0.0 Cr over the last 3 years. Customers take −5,65,729 days to pay and stock waits −32 days to sell.

FY23: debtors at −5,65,729 days, inventory at −32 days — roughly −1.1 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of −5,65,761 days, tighter than FY17's 92.

FY23: a −5,65,761-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 9-year window.
−5,65,853 days vs FY17
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
45,508−1,18,629−2,82,766−4,46,903−6,11,040days−5,65,761d−32d−5,65,729d229dFY14FY16FY18FY20FY23
45,508−1,18,629−2,82,766−4,46,903−6,11,040days−5,65,761d−32d−5,65,729d229dFY14FY18FY23

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹0.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹0.0 Cr, work-in-progress ₹0.0 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
steady investment
CapexWork-in-progress
72−182−436−689−943₹ Cr₹0₹0FY16FY18FY21FY23FY26
72−182−436−689−943₹ Cr₹0₹0FY16FY21FY26

The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd earns a ROCE of 87% in FY17. That is up from a trough of 23% in FY16. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is −3,200.0% net margin on 0.00× asset turns.

FY17 ROCE is 87%, recovered from a FY16 trough of 23% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY23): −3,200.0% net margin × 0.00× asset turns × −0.50× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 0.0% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

FY17: ROCE 87% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line). 4-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY16's 23%
ROCEWACC
93%71%50%28%6.0%%87%FY14FY15FY17
93%71%50%28%6.0%%87%FY14FY15FY17
Q2 FY26: ROCE −0.9% (TTM) Trailing-twelve-month ROCE, per quarter, %. Last 11 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROCE (TTM)
2.0%1.1%0.3%−0.6%−1.5%%−0.9%Q4 FY21Q2 FY24Q2 FY26
2.0%1.1%0.3%−0.6%−1.5%%−0.9%Q4 FY21Q2 FY24Q2 FY26
11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's net worth is negative — it owes more than it owns — so a debt-to-equity ratio is not meaningful here. On the annual view that ratio went from −0.43 in FY21 to −0.43 in FY25. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Dec 25: total debt of ₹1,177 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹−3,981 Cr — a debt-to-equity of −0.30. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from −0.43 (FY21) to −0.43 (FY25). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

FY25: debt ₹1,981 Cr at −0.43× equity Total debt by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
2.1k−0.419×1.6k−0.422×1.1k−0.425×536−0.428×0−0.431×₹ Cr×₹1,981−0.43×FY21FY23FY25
2.1k−0.419×1.6k−0.422×1.1k−0.425×536−0.428×0−0.431×₹ Cr×₹1,981−0.43×FY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: debt ₹1,177 Cr, debt-to-equity −0.30 Total debt per quarter, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters. India reports the full balance sheet half-yearly, so the intervening quarter carries the prior reading forward.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
2.1k−0.29×1.6k−0.33×1.1k−0.36×536−0.40×0−0.44×₹ Cr×₹1,177−0.30×Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25
2.1k−0.29×1.6k−0.33×1.1k−0.36×536−0.40×0−0.44×₹ Cr×₹1,177−0.30×Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25
12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

No holder of State Trading Corporation of India Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. Promoters moved +0.0 points over the same window, to 90.0%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: −0.1 points over 8 quarters to 0.5%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 90.0%; Foreign institutions: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 0.0%.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters +0.0 pts from Mar 24 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 3 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
97%71%45%19%−7.2%%90%0%0.5%9.5%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
97%71%45%19%−7.2%%90%0%0.5%9.5%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
A quiet register: no holder moved a full point in two years Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 13 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
97%71%45%19%−7.2%%90%0.0%0.5%9.5%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
97%71%45%19%−7.2%%90%0.0%0.5%9.5%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

14 · Related companies · Trading
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Onix Solar Energy LtdONIXSOLAR 70.9/100Favorable setup69% evidence 28.9/35 Revenue 26.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 23 pp 95% evidence 18.3/25 ROCE 32% · OPM 30% 76% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 24.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.4/20 RS sector 68.4% · RS bench -3.5% · 1Y 49.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 28.9 + 18.3 + 10.3 + 13.4 = 70.9 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Rashi Peripherals LtdRPTECH 69.0/100Favorable setup75% evidence LEADER 24.9/35 Revenue 40.4% · PAT 50.2% · OPM change -0.3 pp 95% evidence 14.7/25 ROCE 17% · OPM 3% 76% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 17.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 18.7/20 RS sector 51.6% · RS bench 69.1% · 1Y 176.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.9 + 14.7 + 10.7 + 18.7 = 69 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Nupur Recyclers LtdNRL 67.9/100Favorable setup87% evidence LEADER 22.5/35 Revenue 40.6% · PAT 29.8% · OPM change 3.6 pp 95% evidence 16.5/25 ROCE 15.1% · OPM 11.6% 95% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 53.6× · PEG — 50% evidence 19.7/20 RS sector 66.4% · RS bench 88.4% · 1Y 89.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.5 + 16.5 + 9.2 + 19.7 = 67.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Magnus Steel & Infra Ltd517320 67.5/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence 27.8/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1.6 pp 83% evidence 18.5/25 ROCE 171% · OPM 21.3% 76% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 92.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench 46.1% · 1Y 1449.6%0 of 1 week ahead to 2026-06-28 25% evidence
Exact sum: 27.8 + 18.5 + 9.2 + 12 = 67.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Vision Infra Equipment Solutions LtdVIESL 67.3/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence TURNING 19.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0 pp 26% evidence 19.8/25 ROCE 22.6% · OPM 26% 95% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 14.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.6/20 RS sector 26.9% · RS bench 44.5% · 1Y 122.8%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19 + 19.8 + 10.9 + 17.6 = 67.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Shankara Buildpro LtdBUILDPRO 63.3/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence BREAKING OUT 25.6/35 Revenue 26.3% · PAT 41.9% · OPM change -0.2 pp 100% evidence 17.3/25 ROCE 39% · OPM 3.2% 100% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 22.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —8 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 25.6 + 17.3 + 10.4 + 10 = 63.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7Ivalue Infosolutions LtdIVALUE 60.4/100Mixed-positive evidence60% evidence ASLEEP 20.6/35 Revenue 5.4% · PAT 22.1% · OPM change 5.6 pp 95% evidence 18.6/25 ROCE 25.4% · OPM 10% 95% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 11.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y -19.4%6 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 20.6 + 18.6 + 11.2 + 10 = 60.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8Sudarshan Pharma Industries Ltd543828 60.3/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence LEADER 20.9/35 Revenue 32.9% · PAT 24.3% · OPM change 1.5 pp 95% evidence 13.6/25 ROCE 15.1% · OPM 9.1% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 39.2× · PEG — 50% evidence 16.9/20 RS sector 17.5% · RS bench 33.4% · 1Y 25.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.9 + 13.6 + 8.9 + 16.9 = 60.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9Euro Pratik Sales LtdEUROPRATIK 59.9/100Mixed-positive evidence73% evidence ASLEEP 15.1/35 Revenue 23.9% · PAT 29% · OPM change -8 pp 100% evidence 19.5/25 ROCE 38.4% · OPM 26% 100% evidence 15.3/20 P/E 29.1× · PEG 0.62 65% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y 4.7%6 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 15.1 + 19.5 + 15.3 + 10 = 59.9 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
10Tembo Global Industries LtdTEMBO 59.0/100Mixed-positive evidence80% evidence TURNING 22.2/35 Revenue 34% · PAT 55.7% · OPM change 5 pp 95% evidence 18.4/25 ROCE 22.8% · OPM 16% 95% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 10.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.1/20 RS sector -17.4% · RS bench -4.5% · 1Y -10.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.2 + 18.4 + 11.3 + 7.1 = 59 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11Mangalam Global Enterprise LtdMGEL 58.7/100Mixed-positive evidence80% evidence 25.7/35 Revenue 41.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0.5 pp 95% evidence 15.8/25 ROCE 17% · OPM 1.9% 95% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 13× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.1/20 RS sector -14.5% · RS bench -0.2% · 1Y -3.5%6 of 7 weeks ahead to 2026-08-09 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.7 + 15.8 + 11.1 + 6.1 = 58.7 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -14.5% and the one-year return is -3.5%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
12Arisinfra Solutions LtdARIS 57.6/100Mixed-positive evidence65% evidence TURNING 22.0/35 Revenue 45.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence 15.1/25 ROCE 15.6% · OPM 11% 95% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 15.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.7/20 RS sector — · RS bench -1.2% · 1Y -12.3%4 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 22 + 15.1 + 10.8 + 9.7 = 57.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Aayush Art and Bullion Ltd540718 56.4/100Thin evidence · provisional54% evidence BREAKING OUT 21.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 1.6 pp 35% evidence 13.2/25 ROCE 18.9% · OPM 6% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 245× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.1/20 RS sector -1.1% · RS bench 13.5% · 1Y 29.2%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.2 + 13.2 + 8.9 + 13.1 = 56.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
14Patel Retail LtdPATELRMART 53.8/100Mixed-positive evidence65% evidence ASLEEP 18.1/35 Revenue 42.3% · PAT 59.7% · OPM change -2.2 pp 95% evidence 14.3/25 ROCE 15.3% · OPM 6.1% 95% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 16.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.6/20 RS sector — · RS bench 2.8% · 1Y -18.4%5 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 18.1 + 14.3 + 10.8 + 10.6 = 53.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15Prostarm Info Systems LtdPROSTARM 52.0/100Mixed-positive evidence65% evidence BASING 17.1/35 Revenue 30.5% · PAT 19.1% · OPM change 1.4 pp 95% evidence 16.1/25 ROCE 18% · OPM 8.5% 95% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 22× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench -12.2% · 1Y -35.5%0 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 17.1 + 16.1 + 10.5 + 8.3 = 52 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16Fabtech Technologies LtdFABTECH 50.8/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence TURNING 17.5/35 Revenue 14.2% · PAT 41% · OPM change 14.8 pp 71% evidence 12.3/25 ROCE 13.6% · OPM 5.7% 95% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 13.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —0 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 17.5 + 12.3 + 11 + 10 = 50.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17Lloyds Enterprises LtdLLOYDSENT 50.3/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence TURNING 18.1/35 Revenue 33% · PAT -21.4% · OPM change 9 pp 95% evidence 11.3/25 ROCE 3.7% · OPM 16% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 93.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.8/20 RS sector -5% · RS bench 8.7% · 1Y -6%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.1 + 11.3 + 9.1 + 11.8 = 50.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
18BMW Ventures LtdBMW 50.0/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence 16.9/35 Revenue 18.5% · PAT 24.2% · OPM change -0.6 pp 95% evidence 11.9/25 ROCE 12% · OPM 3.4% 76% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 12.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y -18.7%0 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 16.9 + 11.9 + 11.2 + 10 = 50 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
19SG Mart LtdSGMART 48.9/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence LEADER 13.9/35 Revenue 10.4% · PAT 14.7% · OPM change 1.4 pp 100% evidence 8.6/25 ROCE 10.2% · OPM 4.5% 100% evidence 8.2/20 P/E 76.1× · PEG 1.92 65% evidence 18.2/20 RS sector 34.9% · RS bench 51.7% · 1Y 106.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.9 + 8.6 + 8.2 + 18.2 = 48.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 51.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
20Bizotic Commercial Ltd543926 48.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0 pp 26% evidence 18.6/25 ROCE 26.8% · OPM 8% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 34.1× · PEG — 50% evidence 0.6/20 RS sector -86.7% · RS bench -18.3% · 1Y -72.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.8 + 18.6 + 9.7 + 0.6 = 48.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
21Yogi LtdYOGI 47.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence 20.3/35 Revenue 97.5% · PAT 68.1% · OPM change -5.9 pp 62% evidence 9.9/25 ROCE 12.8% · OPM 2.6% 76% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 54.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.2/20 RS sector -6.5% · RS bench -2.1% · 1Y -11.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.3 + 9.9 + 9.5 + 8.2 = 47.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
22Shiv Aum Steels LtdSHIVAUM 47.4/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence BREAKING OUT 16.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.3 pp 45% evidence 11.4/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 4.7% 95% evidence 7.2/20 P/E 66.8× · PEG — 50% evidence 11.9/20 RS sector — · RS bench 38.3% · 1Y —6 of 6 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 16.9 + 11.4 + 7.2 + 11.9 = 47.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
23Dhunseri Ventures LtdDVL 46.8/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence BREAKING OUT 12.6/35 Revenue -20% · PAT 31.7% · OPM change -12 pp 95% evidence 9.7/25 ROCE 6.7% · OPM 39% 95% evidence 11.9/20 P/E 5.3× · PEG — 50% evidence 12.6/20 RS sector -7.1% · RS bench 8% · 1Y -14.9%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.6 + 9.7 + 11.9 + 12.6 = 46.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
24Adani Enterprises LtdADANIENT 45.5/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence TURNING 14.3/35 Revenue 18.1% · PAT 4.2% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence 8.5/25 ROCE 5.8% · OPM 15% 100% evidence 7.7/20 P/E 174× · PEG 1.96 65% evidence 15.0/20 RS sector 8.6% · RS bench 23.9% · 1Y 38.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.3 + 8.5 + 7.7 + 15 = 45.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 23.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
25MMTC LtdMMTC 44.8/100Mixed-negative evidence96% evidence ASLEEP 15.1/35 Revenue 0% · PAT 100% · OPM change -1270 pp 100% evidence 8.0/25 ROCE 8.7% · OPM — 84% evidence 15.3/20 P/E 46.1× · PEG 0.92 100% evidence 6.4/20 RS sector -14.9% · RS bench -1.9% · 1Y -4.1%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.1 + 8 + 15.3 + 6.4 = 44.8 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
26State Trading Corporation of India Ltdthis pageSTCINDIA 42.5/100Mixed-negative evidence67% evidence ASLEEP 19.6/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change -14.6 pp 67% evidence 5.6/25 ROCE -0.9% · OPM — 80% evidence 11.9/20 P/E 14× · PEG — 50% evidence 5.4/20 RS sector -28.7% · RS bench -5.6% · 1Y -5.6%2 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.6 + 5.6 + 11.9 + 5.4 = 42.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
27RRP Semiconductor LtdRRP 41.1/100Thin evidence · provisional54% evidence 11.4/35 Revenue -80% · PAT -80% · OPM change 3.3 pp 71% evidence 5.4/25 ROCE -32.7% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 14.3/20 RS sector 65.3% · RS bench 0.8% · 1Y 66.5%0 of 1 week ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 11.4 + 5.4 + 10 + 14.3 = 41.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
28Cropster Agro Ltd523105 40.7/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence 16.0/35 Revenue 28.4% · PAT 6.5% · OPM change 2.1 pp 83% evidence 11.3/25 ROCE 12.4% · OPM 8.7% 76% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 31× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.3/20 RS sector -72.7% · RS bench -62.7% · 1Y -83.2%0 of 1 week ahead to 2026-08-09 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16 + 11.3 + 10.1 + 3.3 = 40.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
29Hexa Tradex LtdHEXATRADEX 40.3/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence BASING 17.2/35 Revenue 0.4% · PAT 70.3% · OPM change 13.6 pp 71% evidence 6.1/25 ROCE -0.1% · OPM — 80% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 7.0/20 RS sector -16.8% · RS bench -3.7% · 1Y -12.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.2 + 6.1 + 10 + 7 = 40.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
30Hardwyn India LtdHARDWYN 40.2/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence ASLEEP 13.8/35 Revenue 2.6% · PAT -8.5% · OPM change -0.2 pp 95% evidence 12.5/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 13% 95% evidence 12.1/20 P/E 50.6× · PEG — 50% evidence 1.8/20 RS sector -38.3% · RS bench -29.5% · 1Y -3.4%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.8 + 12.5 + 12.1 + 1.8 = 40.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
31Blue Pearl Agriventures LtdBPAGRI 39.8/100Mixed-negative evidence69% evidence 20.5/35 Revenue 19.3% · PAT 59.1% · OPM change 0.3 pp 95% evidence 6.3/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 3.3% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 514× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.3/20 RS sector -33.5% · RS bench -82.5% · 1Y -91.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.5 + 6.3 + 8.7 + 4.3 = 39.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
32Pervasive Commodities Ltd517172 38.3/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence 12.7/35 Revenue 25.6% · PAT -8.3% · OPM change -6.1 pp 95% evidence 5.6/25 ROCE 0% · OPM -10.2% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence
Exact sum: 12.7 + 5.6 + 10 + 10 = 38.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
33Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols Ltd524480 38.0/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence FADING 12.4/35 Revenue -38% · PAT 38.4% · OPM change -2.8 pp 95% evidence 6.6/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM -3% 76% evidence 6.5/20 P/E 37.3× · PEG — 50% evidence 12.5/20 RS sector 10.5% · RS bench 25.4% · 1Y 33.5%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.4 + 6.6 + 6.5 + 12.5 = 38 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
34PTC India LtdPTC 36.6/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence BASING 11.2/35 Revenue 13.3% · PAT -43.1% · OPM change -3.9 pp 95% evidence 12.6/25 ROCE 13.4% · OPM 3.1% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 8.8× · PEG — 50% evidence 3.1/20 RS sector -21.6% · RS bench -9.8% · 1Y -13%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.2 + 12.6 + 9.7 + 3.1 = 36.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
35Neueon Corporation LtdNEUEON 35.6/100Thin evidence · provisional59% evidence ASLEEP 9.1/35 Revenue 17.8% · PAT -80% · OPM change -1039 pp 71% evidence 3.7/25 ROCE -40.4% · OPM — 80% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 12.8/20 RS sector 12.7% · RS bench -1.5% · 1Y —1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9.1 + 3.7 + 10 + 12.8 = 35.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
36Kothari Industrial Corporation LtdKOTIC 34.2/100Adverse evidence63% evidence BASING 18.8/35 Revenue 75.9% · PAT -80% · OPM change -41.8 pp 71% evidence 1.6/25 ROCE -28.9% · OPM -43% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.8/20 RS sector -58.6% · RS bench -43.5% · 1Y -77.5%0 of 9 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.8 + 1.6 + 10 + 3.8 = 34.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
37Shanti Overseas (India) LtdSHANTI 32.3/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence 11.2/35 Revenue -63.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change -200.5 pp 40% evidence 4.5/25 ROCE -25.2% · OPM -216.5% 71% evidence 13.1/20 P/E 3× · PEG — 50% evidence 3.5/20 RS sector -60.4% · RS bench -49.7% · 1Y -47.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-29 70% evidence
Exact sum: 11.2 + 4.5 + 13.1 + 3.5 = 32.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
38BN Agrochem LtdBNAGROCHEM 32.2/100Adverse evidence77% evidence ASLEEP 12.9/35 Revenue 84.5% · PAT -61% · OPM change -9.4 pp 100% evidence 4.4/25 ROCE 4.4% · OPM 2.3% 100% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 117× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.9/20 RS sector -16.7% · RS bench -35.6% · 1Y -46.5%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.9 + 4.4 + 9 + 5.9 = 32.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
39Uniphos Enterprises LtdUNIENTER 30.4/100Adverse evidence69% evidence BASING 12.6/35 Revenue -77.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change -0.9 pp 71% evidence 4.6/25 ROCE 0.8% · OPM — 80% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 31.4× · PEG — 50% evidence 4.4/20 RS sector -43.6% · RS bench -22% · 1Y -41%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.6 + 4.6 + 8.8 + 4.4 = 30.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
40Oswal Agro Mills LtdOSWALAGRO 24.7/100Adverse evidence67% evidence 2.8/35 Revenue -80% · PAT -80% · OPM change -21782.3 pp 95% evidence 7.8/25 ROCE 2% · OPM — 80% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 4.1/20 RS sector -50.3% · RS bench -32% · 1Y -49.6%0 of 6 weeks ahead to 2026-08-16 70% evidence
Exact sum: 2.8 + 7.8 + 10 + 4.1 = 24.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
41Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company LtdMSCTC 56.9/100Thin evidence · provisional32% evidence 20.8/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change — 29% evidence 15.2/25 ROCE 22.6% · OPM 15.3% 57% evidence 8.6/20 P/E 687× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 74.6% · 1Y 93.7%6 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 25% evidence
Exact sum: 20.8 + 15.2 + 8.6 + 12.3 = 56.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
42Proventus Agrocom LtdPROV 56.7/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence BREAKING OUT 19.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.2 pp 26% evidence 12.4/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 1.8% 95% evidence 13.1/20 P/E 42.8× · PEG — 50% evidence 11.6/20 RS sector — · RS bench 26.9% · 1Y —12 of 12 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 19.6 + 12.4 + 13.1 + 11.6 = 56.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
43DC Infotech & Communication LtdDCI 56.3/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence 18.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.3 pp 24% evidence 17.6/25 ROCE 22.9% · OPM 4.7% 76% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 20.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.5/20 RS sector — · RS bench -1.6% · 1Y — 25% evidence
Exact sum: 18.6 + 17.6 + 10.6 + 9.5 = 56.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
44SK Minerals & Additives Ltd544584 55.8/100Thin evidence · provisional36% evidence TURNING 16.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.3 pp 39% evidence 19.0/25 ROCE 26.2% · OPM 10.7% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 29.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —3 of 4 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 16.6 + 19 + 10.2 + 10 = 55.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
45Monika Alcobev LtdMONIKA 54.0/100Thin evidence · provisional22% evidence 16.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2 pp 15% evidence 17.0/25 ROCE 21% · OPM 15% 57% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 20.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y -10.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 0% evidence
Exact sum: 16.4 + 17 + 10.6 + 10 = 54 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
46Shah Foods Ltd519031 53.6/100Thin evidence · provisional18% evidence TURNING 17.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -10.7 pp 7% evidence 15.3/25 ROCE — · OPM 18% 30% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 276× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.4/20 RS sector — · RS bench 103.9% · 1Y —4 of 4 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 17.1 + 15.3 + 8.8 + 12.4 = 53.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
47Pramara Promotions LtdPRAMARA 51.7/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence 16.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 15% evidence 13.9/25 ROCE 15.2% · OPM 15% 71% evidence 6.9/20 P/E 51.3× · PEG — 50% evidence 14.3/20 RS sector 7.9% · RS bench 29% · 1Y 34.5%10 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-04-19 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.6 + 13.9 + 6.9 + 14.3 = 51.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
48Manbro Industries Ltd512595 50.9/100Thin evidence · provisional22% evidence 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 32.8 pp 5% evidence 13.1/25 ROCE — · OPM 6.6% 23% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 9.5/20 RS sector -17.3% · RS bench 37.2% · 1Y 62.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-05-03 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.3 + 13.1 + 10 + 9.5 = 50.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
49Le Merite Exports LtdLEMERITE 47.2/100Thin evidence · provisional40% evidence 18.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.9 pp 15% evidence 9.1/25 ROCE 8.6% · OPM 2.8% 71% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 87× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.9/20 RS sector -9% · RS bench 15% · 1Y 28.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-05-17 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.9 + 9.1 + 9.3 + 9.9 = 47.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
50Satani Bearings Ltd505703 45.2/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence TURNING 20.5/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change — 33% evidence 4.7/25 ROCE 1% · OPM -3.7% 76% evidence 8.6/20 P/E 5197× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.4/20 RS sector — · RS bench 24.9% · 1Y 176.6%1 of 11 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 20.5 + 4.7 + 8.6 + 11.4 = 45.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
51Keto Motors Ltd537392 43.3/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence TURNING 16.3/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change — 33% evidence 6.0/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM 10.7% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 7503× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.5/20 RS sector — · RS bench 272.8% · 1Y —4 of 4 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 16.3 + 6 + 8.5 + 12.5 = 43.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
52A-1 LtdA1L 41.0/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence 16.2/35 Revenue 8.3% · PAT -30.6% · OPM change -0.9 pp 53% evidence 10.7/25 ROCE 10.6% · OPM 2.9% 57% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 383× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.3/20 RS sector -24.5% · RS bench -16% · 1Y -8.6%6 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.2 + 10.7 + 8.8 + 5.3 = 41 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's share price today?

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd trades at ₹113, −5.4% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹676 Cr. The stock sits at 29% of its 52-week range of ₹99–₹145, −6.7% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 2 weeks in. — as of 11 September 2026.

What were State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's latest quarterly results?

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd reported revenue of ₹0.0 Cr and net profit of ₹9.8 Cr for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹1.63. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's revenue?

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd reported revenue of ₹0.0 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹0.0 Cr. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's profit?

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd earned ₹9.8 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +209.2% year on year — the 2nd straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹648 Cr. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's market cap?

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹676 Cr at a share price of ₹113. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's P/E ratio?

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd trades at a P/E of 14.0×, at the 24th percentile of its own 5-year range, against a long-run median of 16.2×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 11 September 2026.

Does State Trading Corporation of India Ltd pay a dividend?

No — State Trading Corporation of India Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is State Trading Corporation of India Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, State Trading Corporation of India Ltd looks cheap: its P/E of 14.0× has been cheaper only 24% of the time in 5 years (long-run median 16.2×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. One caveat: margins are the best this company has ever printed — cheap on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. — as of 11 September 2026.

How is State Trading Corporation of India Ltd performing?

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd is in a downtrend, 2 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 9 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is State Trading Corporation of India Ltd in an uptrend?

No — the price is in a downtrend (week 2 of stage 4), trading −6.7% versus its 200-day average and at 29% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 11 September 2026.

Is State Trading Corporation of India Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view State Trading Corporation of India Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (9 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-10), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +30% against the NIFTY 500's +267% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 11 September 2026.

Will State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹113, the price is in a downtrend 2 weeks in. Its P/E of 14.0× sits at the 24th percentile of its own 5-year range. — as of 11 September 2026.

Who owns State Trading Corporation of India Ltd?

Promoters hold 90.0% of State Trading Corporation of India Ltd, foreign institutions 0.0%, domestic institutions 0.5% and the public 9.5% (latest quarter). No holder moved a full point over the last two years — the register is quiet. — as of 11 September 2026.

Does State Trading Corporation of India Ltd have too much debt?

No — State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's debt-to-equity is −0.30, and operating profit covers the interest bill −23×. FY26 borrowings were ₹1,175 Cr against equity of ₹−3,948 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 11 September 2026.

What is State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's capex?

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd spent ₹0.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹0.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's cash flow?

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd generated ₹52.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹52.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹0.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹648 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's profit real cash?

No — operating cash was negative over the last 3 fiscal years: State Trading Corporation of India Ltd consumed cash while reporting profit. In FY26, operating cash was ₹52.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹648 Cr. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 11 September 2026.

Where is State Trading Corporation of India Ltd in its business cycle?

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's FY23 operating margin was 4,800.0%, against a 9-year band of −37.0%–4,800.0%: the top of the band — a record year. Record profitability is late-cycle territory: every ratio flatters at the top, and the story leans on margins holding. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 11 September 2026.

What could break the State Trading Corporation of India Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +2,522.1% against a −5.4% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 11 September 2026.

Is State Trading Corporation of India Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: State Trading Corporation of India Ltd's balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup. The sharpest open question: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 11 September 2026.

Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-11. Every chart on this page is drawn by deterministic code from the raw series — no forecasts, no price opinions, and nothing here is investment advice.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI