Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd
MSCTCMardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
Biggest watch item: the price is already 63 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (63 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read mixed, and −206% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd trades at ₹104, in a confirmed uptrend and 63 weeks into that stage. That is +99.3% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 83% of a 52-week range of ₹8 to ₹123. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (6 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 63 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹104 it trades +99.3% versus its 200-day average and sits at 83% of its 52-week range (₹8–₹123).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 9.9 years the stock moved +836% while the NIFTY 500 moved +242% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (6 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-01-19) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd trades at 687.0× P/E, against too little history to rank. Its long-run median P/E is 307.0×, measured across 9.2 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 687.0× is against too little history to rank, against a long-run median of 307.0× measured over 9.2 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 4 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profit | — | +242.0% | — | — |
| EPS | — | +250.3% | — | — |
| Share price | +1,091.8% | — | +123.1% | +25.1% |
4-Factor Sector Score
57.2/100 — rank 36 of 48 in Trading · 32% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd scores 57.2 out of 100 against the 48 companies it is compared with in Trading, ranking 36. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 20.5 + 15.7 + 8.7 + 12.3 = 57.2. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd reported ₹12.3 Cr of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹0.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹12.8 Cr. A multi-year compound rate is not shown because the annual history behind it is too short to compute one honestly.
FY25 revenue came in at ₹0.0 Cr (null on the year). The latest quarter (Dec 25) printed ₹12.3 Cr, null year on year.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's operating margin is 15.3% in the Dec 25 quarter. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −150.8% to 4,000.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 15.3%, null pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −150.8%–4,000.0%.
Why: the numbers show the operating margin move clearly, but the cost lines behind it sit below what we hold — so we state the move without inventing its driver.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd earned ₹1.3 Cr of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹1.2 Cr. That is 10.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹0.1 Cr. 10 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Dec 25 profit was ₹1.3 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed ₹1.2 Cr (null).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 2 fiscal years −206% of Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY25 that was ₹−2.5 Cr of operating cash against ₹1.2 Cr of profit. After ₹−3.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹0.0 Cr was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of ₹−2.5 Cr against reported profit of ₹1.2 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹0.0 Cr after ₹−3.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 2 fiscal years the conversion rate is −206% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
🚨 Why conversion sits at −206%: the cash cycle tightened 4,478 days between FY14 and FY24 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs −1,929 days in FY24, down from 2,549 days in FY14. Capital spending ran ₹−2.0 Cr over the last 3 years. Customers take 0 days to pay and stock waits −1,929 days to sell.
FY24: debtors at 0 days, inventory at −1,929 days — roughly −63.5 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of −1,929 days, tighter than FY14's 2,549.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹−2.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY25) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd earns a ROCE of 23% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −10% in FY24. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 364.3% net margin on −0.02× asset turns.
FY25 ROCE is 23%, recovered from a FY24 trough of −10% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY24): 364.3% net margin × −0.02× asset turns × 1.54× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −11.2% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd carries ₹0.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹5.6 Cr of equity in FY25, a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹0.0 Cr to ₹0.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹−2.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY25: borrowings of ₹0.0 Cr against equity of ₹5.6 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹0.0 Cr to ₹0.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹−2.0 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
No holder of Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. Domestic institutions moved +0.0 points over the same window, to 0.1%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 69.4%; Domestic institutions: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 0.1%.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Rashi Peripherals LtdRPTECH | 67.0/100Favorable setup71% evidence | LEADER | 21.1/35 Revenue 14.9% · PAT 34.8% · OPM change -0.1 pp 83% evidence | 15.3/25 ROCE 16.8% · OPM 3% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 19.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.8/20 RS sector 68.7% · RS bench 92.3% · 1Y 182.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.1 + 15.3 + 10.8 + 19.8 = 67 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Magnus Steel & Infra Ltd517320 | 66.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | 27.1/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1.6 pp 83% evidence | 18.6/25 ROCE 171% · OPM 21.3% 76% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 92.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench 46.1% · 1Y 1449.6%6 of 7 weeks ahead to 2026-06-28 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 27.1 + 18.6 + 9.2 + 12 = 66.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3Shankara Buildpro LtdBUILDPRO | 63.2/100Thin evidence · provisional59% evidence | TURNING | 25.3/35 Revenue 28.8% · PAT 68.4% · OPM change 0.5 pp 88% evidence | 17.3/25 ROCE 39% · OPM 3.5% 100% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 23.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —8 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.3 + 17.3 + 10.6 + 10 = 63.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Mangalam Global Enterprise LtdMGEL | 63.0/100Mixed-positive evidence65% evidence | TURNING | 24.4/35 Revenue 41.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0.5 pp 95% evidence | 16.6/25 ROCE 17% · OPM 1.9% 95% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 14.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.9/20 RS sector — · RS bench 10.1% · 1Y —3 of 3 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.4 + 16.6 + 11.1 + 10.9 = 63 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Vision Infra Equipment Solutions LtdVIESL | 60.7/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence | LEADER | 18.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2 pp 13% evidence | 19.0/25 ROCE 19.6% · OPM 27% 95% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 25.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.4/20 RS sector 4.4% · RS bench 20.9% · 1Y 93.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 19 + 10.5 + 12.4 = 60.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Euro Pratik Sales LtdEUROPRATIK | 60.5/100Mixed-positive evidence69% evidence | TURNING | 14.5/35 Revenue 18% · PAT 4% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence | 21.1/25 ROCE 38.4% · OPM 27% 100% evidence | 14.9/20 P/E 37.6× · PEG 0.62 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —7 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.5 + 21.1 + 14.9 + 10 = 60.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 7Sudarshan Pharma Industries Ltd543828 | 59.8/100Mixed-positive evidence78% evidence | LEADER | 18.5/35 Revenue 38.9% · PAT 53.3% · OPM change -1 pp 83% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 15.1% · OPM 9% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 39.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 17.9/20 RS sector 9% · RS bench 27.5% · 1Y 45.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.5 + 14.3 + 9.1 + 17.9 = 59.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Lloyds Enterprises LtdLLOYDSENT | 55.6/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | LEADER | 21.4/35 Revenue 18.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 83% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 3.7% · OPM 6% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 1106× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.7/20 RS sector 4% · RS bench 22.5% · 1Y 10.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 9.8 + 8.7 + 15.7 = 55.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Tembo Global Industries LtdTEMBO | 55.3/100Mixed-positive evidence70% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.0/35 Revenue 48.5% · PAT 78.2% · OPM change 1 pp 83% evidence | 18.0/25 ROCE 22.8% · OPM 11% 95% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 11.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.0/20 RS sector -24.8% · RS bench -8.2% · 1Y 10.6%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20 + 18 + 11.3 + 6 = 55.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Yogi Ltd511702 | 54.5/100Mixed-positive evidence61% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3.6 pp 53% evidence | 11.3/25 ROCE 12.8% · OPM 4.4% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 36.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.0/20 RS sector -17.5% · RS bench -2.5% · 1Y -13.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.2 + 11.3 + 10 + 9 = 54.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Nupur Recyclers LtdNRL | 53.8/100Mixed-positive evidence68% evidence | TURNING | 15.9/35 Revenue 36.4% · PAT 1.2% · OPM change 1.1 pp 83% evidence | 16.1/25 ROCE 15.1% · OPM 6.4% 95% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 51.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 12.2/20 RS sector — · RS bench 60.1% · 1Y —2 of 2 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.9 + 16.1 + 9.6 + 12.2 = 53.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Arisinfra Solutions LtdARIS | 53.5/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.1/35 Revenue 39.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 4.5 pp 62% evidence | 15.3/25 ROCE 15.6% · OPM 9% 95% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 19.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.2/20 RS sector — · RS bench -2.4% · 1Y -11.4%4 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 15.3 + 10.9 + 9.2 = 53.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Aayush Art and Bullion Ltd540718 | 53.4/100Thin evidence · provisional54% evidence | TURNING | 20.9/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 1.6 pp 35% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 18.9% · OPM 6% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 233× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.7/20 RS sector -7.3% · RS bench 8.5% · 1Y 31.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.9 + 13.8 + 9 + 9.7 = 53.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14Onix Solar Energy Ltd513119 | 52.1/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.1/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 23 pp 95% evidence | 11.3/25 ROCE 10% · OPM 30% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 32.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.5/20 RS sector -8.1% · RS bench 29.6% · 1Y 32.1%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 11.3 + 10.2 + 8.5 = 52.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Bizotic Commercial Ltd543926 | 51.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0 pp 26% evidence | 19.1/25 ROCE 26.8% · OPM 8% 76% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 29.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 2.0/20 RS sector -38% · RS bench -27.8% · 1Y 109.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 19.1 + 10.4 + 2 = 51.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 16Patel Retail LtdPATELRMART | 51.2/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | TURNING | 15.7/35 Revenue 27.7% · PAT 54.4% · OPM change -1.9 pp 83% evidence | 14.6/25 ROCE 15.3% · OPM 5.2% 95% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 19.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —7 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.7 + 14.6 + 10.9 + 10 = 51.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Fabtech Technologies LtdFABTECH | 51.2/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.4/35 Revenue 14.2% · PAT 41% · OPM change 14.8 pp 71% evidence | 12.7/25 ROCE 13.6% · OPM 5.7% 95% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 13.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —0 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.4 + 12.7 + 11.1 + 10 = 51.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18SG Mart LtdSGMART | 50.2/100Mixed-positive evidence90% evidence | LEADER | 14.8/35 Revenue 10.4% · PAT 14.7% · OPM change 1.4 pp 95% evidence | 9.2/25 ROCE 10.2% · OPM 4.5% 95% evidence | 8.4/20 P/E 70.7× · PEG 1.92 65% evidence | 17.8/20 RS sector 32.1% · RS bench 51.9% · 1Y 94.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.8 + 9.2 + 8.4 + 17.8 = 50.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 51.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 19Adani Enterprises LtdADANIENT | 47.8/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence | LEADER | 14.6/35 Revenue 18.1% · PAT 4.2% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 8.7/25 ROCE 5.8% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 7.7/20 P/E 172× · PEG 1.96 65% evidence | 16.8/20 RS sector 5.5% · RS bench 23.2% · 1Y 21.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.6 + 8.7 + 7.7 + 16.8 = 47.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 23.2%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 20Shiv Aum Steels LtdSHIVAUM | 47.8/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | 16.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.5 pp 32% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 3.8% 95% evidence | 7.8/20 P/E 83.3× · PEG — 50% evidence | 11.8/20 RS sector — · RS bench 35.4% · 1Y — 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 11.5 + 7.8 + 11.8 = 47.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21BN Agrochem LtdBNAGROCHEM | 47.1/100Mixed-negative evidence73% evidence | TURNING | 24.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 57.3% · OPM change 20.5 pp 88% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE 4.4% · OPM 1.6% 100% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 79.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.5/20 RS sector -19.2% · RS bench -10.6% · 1Y 3.2%8 of 8 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.2 + 7 + 9.4 + 6.5 = 47.1 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -19.2% and the one-year return is 3.2%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 22Hardwyn India LtdHARDWYN | 46.2/100Mixed-negative evidence83% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.5/35 Revenue 8.3% · PAT 17.5% · OPM change 3.5 pp 83% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 10% 95% evidence | 11.8/20 P/E 58.3× · PEG — 50% evidence | 1.6/20 RS sector -45.2% · RS bench -15.3% · 1Y -21.1%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 12.3 + 11.8 + 1.6 = 46.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23MMTC LtdMMTC | 45.3/100Mixed-negative evidence86% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.1/35 Revenue 0% · PAT 100% · OPM change -5633.5 pp 88% evidence | 9.7/25 ROCE 8.7% · OPM — 84% evidence | 13.8/20 P/E 94× · PEG 0.92 100% evidence | 6.7/20 RS sector -22.9% · RS bench -3.3% · 1Y -6.7%7 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 9.7 + 13.8 + 6.7 = 45.3 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 24State Trading Corporation of India LtdSTCINDIA | 44.8/100Thin evidence · provisional54% evidence | TURNING | 18.6/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change -14.6 pp 43% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE -0.9% · OPM — 60% evidence | 12.1/20 P/E 16.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -30.7% · RS bench -1.9% · 1Y -6.2%5 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 7.5 + 12.1 + 6.6 = 44.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 25PTC India LtdPTC | 43.3/100Mixed-negative evidence78% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.2/35 Revenue 4.6% · PAT -26.5% · OPM change -1.3 pp 83% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 13.4% · OPM 3.7% 76% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 8.5× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.4/20 RS sector -15.3% · RS bench -0.3% · 1Y -8.2%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.2 + 13.1 + 10.6 + 6.4 = 43.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26RRP Semiconductor LtdRRP | 42.7/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence | 12.2/35 Revenue -80% · PAT -80% · OPM change 3.3 pp 62% evidence | 5.5/25 ROCE -32.7% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 15.0/20 RS sector 61.8% · RS bench 6.5% · 1Y 195.8%0 of 1 week ahead 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 12.2 + 5.5 + 10 + 15 = 42.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols Ltd524480 | 42.3/100Mixed-negative evidence78% evidence | LEADER | 12.1/35 Revenue 74.8% · PAT 0% · OPM change -77 pp 83% evidence | 6.4/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM -89% 76% evidence | 7.0/20 P/E 26.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 16.8/20 RS sector 8.9% · RS bench 26.8% · 1Y 23.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.1 + 6.4 + 7 + 16.8 = 42.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 26.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 28Neueon Corporation LtdNEUEON | 41.8/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -80% · OPM change -3110 pp 62% evidence | 3.5/25 ROCE -40.4% · OPM — 80% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 15.9/20 RS sector 16.9% · RS bench 39.6% · 1Y —7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.4 + 3.5 + 10 + 15.9 = 41.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29Cropster Agro Ltd523105 | 41.0/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence | 16.1/35 Revenue 28.4% · PAT 6.5% · OPM change 2.1 pp 83% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 12.4% · OPM 8.7% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 32.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -73.5% · RS bench -60.9% · 1Y -70.2%0 of 4 weeks ahead 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 16.1 + 11.8 + 10.1 + 3 = 41 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 30Hexa Tradex LtdHEXATRADEX | 37.9/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.8/35 Revenue 0.4% · PAT 65% · OPM change 13.6 pp 62% evidence | 4.2/25 ROCE -0.1% · OPM -191.7% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 6.9/20 RS sector -21.2% · RS bench -6.7% · 1Y -14.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 4.2 + 10 + 6.9 = 37.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 31Kothari Industrial Corporation LtdKOTIC | 35.1/100Thin evidence · provisional59% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.8/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -80% · OPM change -1 pp 62% evidence | 1.8/25 ROCE -28.9% · OPM -54% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -60% · RS bench -45.5% · 1Y -60.3%0 of 7 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 1.8 + 10 + 3.5 = 35.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 32Shanti Overseas (India) LtdSHANTI | 32.4/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | 11.3/35 Revenue -63.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change -200.5 pp 40% evidence | 4.5/25 ROCE -25.2% · OPM -216.5% 71% evidence | 13.3/20 P/E 3× · PEG — 50% evidence | 3.3/20 RS sector -61.6% · RS bench -49.7% · 1Y -60.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-29 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 11.3 + 4.5 + 13.3 + 3.3 = 32.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 33Dhunseri Ventures LtdDVL | 30.8/100Adverse evidence69% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.8/35 Revenue -30.8% · PAT -38.9% · OPM change -4 pp 62% evidence | 6.0/25 ROCE 6.7% · OPM -85% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 5.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -45.9% · RS bench -14.2% · 1Y -33.4%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.8 + 6 + 8.5 + 4.5 = 30.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 34Uniphos Enterprises LtdUNIENTER | 29.0/100Adverse evidence69% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.1/35 Revenue -71.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change -0.9 pp 62% evidence | 3.0/25 ROCE 0.8% · OPM -3.1% 95% evidence | 8.3/20 P/E 31.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.6/20 RS sector -45.2% · RS bench -25.4% · 1Y -41.1%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.1 + 3 + 8.3 + 4.6 = 29 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 35Oswal Agro Mills LtdOSWALAGRO | 25.9/100Adverse evidence63% evidence | ASLEEP | 4.6/35 Revenue -80% · PAT -80% · OPM change -21782 pp 83% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE 2% · OPM — 80% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.8/20 RS sector -51.8% · RS bench -33.3% · 1Y -54.3%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.6 + 7.5 + 10 + 3.8 = 25.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 36Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltdthis pageMSCTC | 57.2/100Thin evidence · provisional32% evidence | 20.5/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change — 29% evidence | 15.7/25 ROCE 22.6% · OPM 15.3% 57% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 687× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 74.6% · 1Y 236.1%6 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 15.7 + 8.7 + 12.3 = 57.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 37Proventus Agrocom LtdPROV | 56.9/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.2 pp 26% evidence | 13.0/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 1.8% 95% evidence | 13.1/20 P/E 39.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 11.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 25.4% · 1Y —6 of 6 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.5 + 13 + 13.1 + 11.3 = 56.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 38SK Minerals & Additives Ltd544584 | 55.9/100Thin evidence · provisional31% evidence | 16.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0 pp 26% evidence | 19.4/25 ROCE 26.2% · OPM 10% 76% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 30.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 16.2 + 19.4 + 10.3 + 10 = 55.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 39Monika Alcobev LtdMONIKA | 54.6/100Thin evidence · provisional22% evidence | 16.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2 pp 15% evidence | 17.6/25 ROCE 21% · OPM 15% 57% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 20.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y -9%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 0% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 16.3 + 17.6 + 10.7 + 10 = 54.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 40Pramara Promotions LtdPRAMARA | 53.1/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | 16.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 15% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 15.2% · OPM 15% 71% evidence | 7.3/20 P/E 51.3× · PEG — 50% evidence | 14.9/20 RS sector 7.6% · RS bench 29% · 1Y 72.6%10 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-04-19 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 14.3 + 7.3 + 14.9 = 53.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 41BMW Ventures LtdBMW | 52.4/100Thin evidence · provisional26% evidence | 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0 pp 24% evidence | 13.3/25 ROCE 13.6% · OPM 4% 57% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 13.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —0 of 10 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 0% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 13.3 + 11.2 + 10 = 52.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 42Manbro Industries Ltd512595 | 52.0/100Thin evidence · provisional22% evidence | 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 32.8 pp 5% evidence | 13.4/25 ROCE — · OPM 6.6% 23% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.3/20 RS sector -18.9% · RS bench 37.2% · 1Y 40.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-05-03 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 18.3 + 13.4 + 10 + 10.3 = 52 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 43Shah Foods Ltd519031 | 50.9/100Thin evidence · provisional17% evidence | 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -10.7 pp 3% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE — · OPM -3.3% 30% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 293× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.4/20 RS sector — · RS bench 143.1% · 1Y — 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 12.3 + 8.9 + 12.4 = 50.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 44Le Merite Exports LtdLEMERITE | 48.2/100Thin evidence · provisional46% evidence | 18.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.9 pp 15% evidence | 9.3/25 ROCE 8.6% · OPM 2.8% 71% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 87× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.7/20 RS sector -10.6% · RS bench 15% · 1Y 42.1%1 of 1 week ahead to 2026-05-17 100% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 18.9 + 9.3 + 9.3 + 10.7 = 48.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 45Keto Motors Ltd537392 | 46.8/100Thin evidence · provisional21% evidence | 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT -41.7% · OPM change — 12% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE -2.2% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 12.5/20 RS sector — · RS bench 378.2% · 1Y — 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17 + 7.3 + 10 + 12.5 = 46.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 46Satani Bearings Ltd505703 | 45.0/100Thin evidence · provisional37% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.1/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change — 29% evidence | 4.9/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 1.5% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 11020× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.5/20 RS sector — · RS bench 28.3% · 1Y 153.4%0 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.1 + 4.9 + 8.5 + 11.5 = 45 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 47A-1 LtdA1L | 41.5/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | 16.1/35 Revenue 8.3% · PAT -30.6% · OPM change -0.9 pp 53% evidence | 11.1/25 ROCE 10.6% · OPM 2.9% 57% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 383× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.5/20 RS sector -26.6% · RS bench -16% · 1Y 26.3%6 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 16.1 + 11.1 + 8.8 + 5.5 = 41.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 48Blue Pearl Agriventures LtdBPAGRI | 38.5/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | 17.1/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -46.7% · OPM change -2.5 pp 53% evidence | 7.8/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM 2.8% 57% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 5705× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -35.6% · RS bench -25.1% · 1Y -37.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 7.8 + 8.6 + 5 = 38.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's share price today?
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd trades at ₹104, +1,091.8% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹707 Cr. The stock sits at 83% of its 52-week range of ₹8–₹123, +99.3% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 63 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.
What were Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd reported revenue of ₹12.3 Cr and net profit of ₹1.3 Cr for the Dec 25 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹1.85. The operating margin was 15.3%. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's revenue?
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd reported revenue of ₹12.3 Cr in the Dec 25 quarter. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was ₹0.0 Cr. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's profit?
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd earned ₹1.3 Cr of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹1.2 Cr. The operating margin ran 15.3% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's market cap?
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹707 Cr at a share price of ₹104. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd pay a dividend?
No — Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 12 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 31 July 2026.
How is Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd performing?
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 63 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 6 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 63 of stage 2), trading +99.3% versus its 200-day average and at 83% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (6 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-01-19), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 9.9 years the stock moved +836% against the NIFTY 500's +242% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.
Will Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹104, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 63 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 31 July 2026.
Who owns Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd?
Promoters hold 69.4% of Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd, foreign institutions null%, domestic institutions 0.1% and the public 30.5% (latest quarter). No holder moved a full point over the last two years — the register is quiet. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd have too much debt?
No — Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.00, and operating profit covers the interest bill −9×. FY25 borrowings were ₹0.0 Cr against equity of ₹5.6 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's capex?
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd spent ₹−2.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was ₹−3.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's cash flow?
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd generated ₹−2.5 Cr of operating cash flow in FY25 and ₹0.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹−3.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹1.2 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's profit real cash?
Not fully — over the last 2 fiscal years, −206% of Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was ₹−2.5 Cr against reported profit of ₹1.2 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.
Where is Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd in its business cycle?
Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's FY24 operating margin was 407.1%, against a 5-year band of −150.8%–4,000.0%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 15.3%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.
What could break the Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd story?
Biggest watch item: the price is already 63 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Mardia Samyoung Capillary Tubes Company Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.