A-1 share price

A-1 Ltd's share price was ₹5.22 at the close on 30 October 2026. It has been rising for 65 weeks. That is 55.4% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹5 and ₹70, and at that close it sat 1% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today A-1 Ltd is in stage 2. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the NIFTY 500, and it has stayed ahead for 1 week in a row.

Over the last 8 years the share price moved +290% while the NIFTY 500 moved +150%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

For October to December 2025 (the quarter ended 31 December 2025), A-1 reported revenue of ₹69.8 crore, down 6.1% from ₹74.3 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹0.96 crore, down 4.0% from ₹1.00 crore.

A-1 results: October to December 2025 against a year earlier

The next results, for January to March 2026, were due by 30 May 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 60 days of the quarter's end (the January to March quarter comes with the full-year accounts). This page shows them once our weekly data update has read them.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 31 December 2025). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

A-1 closed at ₹5.22 on 30 October 2026, down 88.6% from ₹45.97 a year earlier (31 October 2025) and up 11.3% over five years. Its highest weekly close since October 2018 was ₹70.42 on 28 November 2025.

A-1 share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 30 Oct 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

415 weekly closes from 12 October 2018 to 30 October 2026.

30 Oct 2026: A-1 closed at ₹5.22, up 6.3% on the week and down 8.6% on the month. Results for October to December 2025: Revenue down 6.1% and profit down 4.0% on a year earlier.

The NSE corporate-actions record has no dividend for A-1 since 1 April 2021, so this page cannot show amounts per share.

Yes. A-1 Ltd paid out 47% of its profit as dividends in FY25, and it paid a dividend in 5 of its last 11 reported years.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 7 November 2026.

A-1 is not on any of our India lists this week.

A-1 Ltd earned ₹1.0 Cr of net profit in the Dec 2025 quarter, −4.0% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹4.0 Cr. That is 1.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹1.0 Cr. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY25 profit was ₹4.0 Cr (+300.0% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed −6.1% on a year earlier and the margin moved −1.0 percentage points. Sales did the work, and the margin was about flat.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed −28.4% and revenue +11.5%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

A-1 Ltd reported ₹69.8 Cr of revenue in the Dec 2025 quarter, −6.1% on the same quarter a year earlier. Over 10 years it has grown 13.1% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹331 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹307 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

FY25 revenue was ₹331 Cr, +56.9% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +11.5% on average, against 13.1% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +8.3%, against +18.3% a year over the last 8 quarters (rolling over); profit over the last 12 months grew −30.6%, against +31.9% a year (rolling over).

A-1 Ltd's operating margin was 2.9% in the Dec 2025 quarter, 1.0 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 11 years it has been between −4.0% and 6.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −1.0 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −0.8 points. So the drop came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years, 211% of A-1 Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY25 its operations used ₹11.0 Cr of cash, against ₹4.0 Cr of profit. After ₹2.0 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹13.0 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 211% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 24 days shorter between FY20 and FY25, so cash that used to wait in the business now arrives sooner.

What to look at next: no single use of cash stands out. The next section checks both the cash tied up in daily operations and the spending on assets.

A-1 Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 57 days in FY25, down from 81 days in FY20. It spent ₹6.0 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 56 days to pay, and stock sits for 3 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY25 sales of ₹331 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹0.9 Cr, so roughly ₹52.0 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY25: customers took 56 days to pay and stock sat for 3 days, about 0.1 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of 57 days, shorter than FY20's 81.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 3 days. Customers pay about 56 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 2 days. Together that makes the 57-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹6.0 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹12.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is spending about what it takes to replace what wears out, or less. Work still in progress is ₹0.0 Cr (FY25): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: neither the daily cycle nor new spending is soaking up the cash, so the picture is fairly clean.

A-1 Ltd's P/E is 383.0×, near the high end of its own history: higher than 92% of past readings. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 74.0×, over 7.4 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

The P/E here, and its history, use a profit figure that can leave out one-off items, so it can differ from a P/E worked out on the quarterly results. Those results' earnings per share for the four quarters to Dec 2025 add up to ₹0.05.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +300.0% while the price moved −88.6%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

Where the price move came from: over 5 years the price moved +2.2% a year; about +20.1% a year came from earnings growth and about −17.9 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is high against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

A-1 Ltd's business is getting worse. Revenue and profit growth are shrinking: revenue growth is −6.1% in the latest quarter (from single-quarter figures), against +78.0% at its best in 12 quarters, with ROCE steady at 11.0%. This is based on 9 quarters of 3 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: falling lines mean any ratio below that looks low should be read with that direction in mind.

One or more growth lines have an extreme jump caused by comparing with a near-zero or loss-making quarter. Those jumps are capped before reading and drawn at the edge of the chart, so one odd quarter does not decide the result.

The return figures here are yearly, not quarterly. They show level and direction only; they can support the growth lines but never decide the reading alone.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

A-1 Ltd earned a ROCE of 11% in FY25. That is up from a low of 4% in FY24. We cannot compare its return on capital used with its cost of capital from the data we have. It comes from a 1.2% net margin and 4.47× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 1.2% net margin × 4.47× asset turnover × 1.48× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 7.9% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed.

A-1 Ltd had ₹22.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹50.0 Cr of equity in FY25, so its debt is 0.44× its equity. Its operating profit is 5 times its interest bill. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹6.0 Cr to ₹22.0 Cr. Over the last 3 of those years it spent ₹6.0 Cr on assets.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Interest cover shows how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low debt and high cover are the safe combination.

Part of the spending on assets is being paid for with borrowed money.

Foreign institutions raised their stake in A-1 Ltd by 3.8 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Foreign institutions now own 6.7% of the company. Domestic institutions moved +0.1 points over the same period, to 0.1%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Foreign institutions: +3.8 points over 8 quarters, to 6.7%; Domestic institutions: +0.1 points over 8 quarters, to 0.1%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters, to 70.0%.

Why the owners changed: foreign institutions drove it (+3.8 points). They raised their stake step by step.

For A-1 Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

45.5 out of 100, rank 57 of 65 in Trading, with 33% of the evidence available. It is provisional, so it is ranked below companies with full evidence.

A-1 Ltd scores 45.5 out of 100 against the 65 companies it is compared with in Trading, ranking 57. Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose.

The three scored parts add up to the total exactly: 20.8 + 13.7 + 11 = 45.5 (no relative-strength reading this week; its 20 points are shared across the other three). This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

A-1 ranks 57 of 65 Trading companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 45.5 out of 100.