Obsidian Energy Ltd. share price today

Obsidian Energy Ltd.'s share price was $9.21 at the close on 4 November 2026. That is 10.1% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $6 and $14, and at that close it sat 42% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the S&P 500, and it has been behind for 1 week running.

Over the last 1 year the share price moved +64% while the S&P 500 moved +23%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 30 October 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Obsidian Energy Ltd. pays no dividend. In the last 12 reported quarters it declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to show. Companies like this usually keep their earnings in the business, so the cash-flow sections show where that cash goes.

Obsidian Energy Ltd. is not in the Nasdaq 100, the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones 30, and is not on the US tech stocks list.

Obsidian Energy Ltd. earned $42.0 M of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +174.5% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY25 profit was $35.2 M. Over 4 years profit has grown −46.0% a year on average. That is 23.9% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $15.3 M.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

3 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Why profit moved: revenue changed +41.7% on a year earlier and the margin moved +12.8 percentage points. Most of the change came from keeping more of each sale.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed −32.1% and revenue −16.2%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

Obsidian Energy Ltd. reported $176 M of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +41.7% on the same quarter a year earlier. Over 4 years it has grown 4.8% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at $541 M. The last four reported quarters add to $544 M.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

FY25 revenue was $541 M, −26.0% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew −16.2% on average, against 4.8% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew −21.7%, against −10.8% a year over the last 8 quarters (rolling over).

Obsidian Energy Ltd.'s operating margin was 35.7% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 12.8 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 years it has been between −30.7% and 101.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every $100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +12.8 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +10.7 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years, 110% of Obsidian Energy Ltd.'s reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY25 it brought in $240 M of operating cash against $35.2 M of profit.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

After $299 M of spending on assets, free cash was −$59.4 M: it spent more than its operations brought in.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason.

What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Obsidian Energy Ltd. does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent $1.0 B on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 62.8% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn.

Spending on assets: $1.0 B over the last 3 years.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Obsidian Energy Ltd.'s P/E is 31.5×, with too little history to compare. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar of yearly profit.

In short: there is too little history to say whether the multiple is high or low for this company, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Obsidian Energy Ltd.'s business is getting worse. Revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking: revenue growth is −21.7% in the latest quarter, against +16.0% at its best in 12 quarters, with ROCE falling at 3.9%. This is based on 12 quarters of 4 measures.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: falling lines mean any ratio below that looks low should be read with that direction in mind.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the stock price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Obsidian Energy Ltd. earned a ROE of 3% in FY25. That is up from a low of −14% in FY24. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 3.3 percentage points below its cost of capital, so growth here does not yet pay for the capital it uses.

Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. We do not have the full capital split, so ROE is the longest history we can draw here.

It comes from a 6.5% net margin and 0.29× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 6.5% net margin × 0.29× asset turnover × 1.33× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 2.5% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 3.0% − 6.3% = −3.3 percentage points. The 6.3% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Negative: growth at these returns loses value until returns improve.

Obsidian Energy Ltd. has total debt of $375 M against shareholder equity of $1.4 B as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 0.27× its equity, which is very little. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.52 in FY21 to 0.14 in FY25. So the returns on this page come from the business, not from borrowed money.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

13.7% of Obsidian Energy Ltd.'s tradable shares are in short positions, which are bets that the price will fall, so a large group of traders is betting against it. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 11.3 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead.

There is no quarter-by-quarter list of owners here, so we look at short interest: the share of tradable shares held in short positions, which gain if the price falls.

It is a single reading at one point in time; we do not have its history.

Why it is at this level: the figure does not say who has the short positions or why, so we show the level without guessing the story.

For Obsidian Energy Ltd., the Z-score is 0.49. A Z-score above about 3 is safe and below about 1.8 signals danger, so this is in the danger zone. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 0.49 is inside the danger zone, so the balance sheet is a real risk.

There is no score against its industry: Obsidian Energy Ltd. is not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison for Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.

The score ranks a company within its industry: each measure is scored against the other members. Without that group there is no score, so none is shown.

No sector comparison is shown here, not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison.

Obsidian Energy Ltd. is the 44th largest of 57 Oil & Gas Exploration & Production companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 4 November 2026). Just above it: Infinity Natural Resources, Inc., TXO Partners, L.P. and Vitesse Energy, Inc. Just below it: Granite Ridge Resources, Inc., VAALCO Energy, Inc. and W&T Offshore, Inc.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production companies close in size

41. Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. $800 million
42. TXO Partners, L.P. $726 million
43. Vitesse Energy, Inc. $618 million
44. Obsidian Energy Ltd. $617 million
45. Granite Ridge Resources, Inc. $611 million
46. VAALCO Energy, Inc. $568 million
47. W&T Offshore, Inc. $497 million

All 57 Oil & Gas Exploration & Production companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

2744. Kimball Electronics, Inc. $620 million · Electrical Equipment & Parts
2745. Vitesse Energy, Inc. $618 million · Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
2746. Obsidian Energy Ltd. $618 million
2747. Gladstone Investment Corporation $613 million · Asset Management
2748. The Elmet Group Co. $613 million · Aerospace & Defense

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.