Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. share price today

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s share price was $119.21 at the close on 2 November 2026. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $107 and $191, and at that close it sat 15% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the S&P 500, and it has stayed ahead for 2 weeks in a row.

Over the last 1 year the share price moved −7% while the S&P 500 moved +22%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. paid $2.68 per share over the last four reported quarters. The most recent declaration was $1.63 for Jun 2026. At today's price of $119.21 that is a yield of 2.25%, based on dividends already paid, not a forecast.

A dividend is cash paid out for each share. The 12-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is on one of our US lists: US tech stocks.

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. earned $51.6 M of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $680 M. Over 4 years profit has grown 47.9% a year on average. That is 6.6% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $43.6 M.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY25 profit was $680 M (+343.3% on the year before).

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. reported $782 M of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter. Over 4 years it has grown 2.2% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at $2.6 B.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The quarterly figures for FY23, FY25 do not add up to the full-year total on file, so those quarters are left out of the charts and sums.

FY25 revenue was $2.6 B, +18.4% on the year before.

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s operating margin was 9.2% in the Jun 2026 quarter. Across 5 years it has been between 7.5% and 9.0%. The latest quarter is above every full year in that period.

Operating margin is what is left from every $100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +0.2 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −3.3 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years, 104% of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY25 it brought in $382 M of operating cash against $680 M of profit. After $16.2 M of spending on assets, $366 M was left over as free cash.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason.

What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent $49.3 M on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.6% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn.

Spending on assets: $49.3 M over the last 3 years.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s P/E is 3.0×, with too little history to compare. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +655.0% while the price moved −14.9%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

In short: there is too little history to say whether the multiple is high or low for this company, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 4 quarters of 1 measure, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction.

The return figures here are yearly, not quarterly. They show level and direction only; they can support the growth lines but never decide the reading alone.

There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the stock price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. earned a ROE of 38% in FY25. That is up from a low of 10% in FY23. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 9.3 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 25.9% net margin and 0.73× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. We do not have the full capital split, so ROE is the longest history we can draw here.

Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 25.9% net margin × 0.73× asset turnover × 2.02× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 38.2% on equity. The margin does most of the work; borrowing is a big part of it.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 13.8% − 4.5% = +9.3 percentage points. The 4.5% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. A gap this wide means each dollar put back into the business creates more than a dollar of value.

The 13.8% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY25 at 11.2%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method.

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has total debt of $671 M against shareholder equity of $1.7 B as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 0.40× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.60 in FY21 to 0.33 in FY25. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

We have no ownership or short-position figures for Formula Systems (1985) Ltd., so this section says so rather than fill the gap. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 2.0 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead.

There is no quarter-by-quarter list of owners here, so we look at short interest: the share of tradable shares held in short positions, which gain if the price falls.

For Formula Systems (1985) Ltd., the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

There is no score against its industry: Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison for Information Technology Services.

The score ranks a company within its industry: each measure is scored against the other members. Without that group there is no score, so none is shown.

No sector comparison is shown here, not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison.

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is the 32nd largest of 52 Information Technology Services companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 4 November 2026). Just above it: Pony AI Inc., Concentrix Corporation and ChronoScale Holdings Corporation. Just below it: Mega Fortune Company, Everforth, Inc. and Innodata Inc.

Information Technology Services companies close in size

29. Pony AI Inc. $2.1 billion
30. Concentrix Corporation $1.9 billion
31. ChronoScale Holdings Corporation $1.8 billion
32. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. $1.7 billion
33. Mega Fortune Company Limited $1.6 billion
34. Everforth, Inc. $1.5 billion
35. Innodata Inc. $1.5 billion

All 52 Information Technology Services companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

2112. Personalis, Inc. $1.7 billion · Diagnostics & Research
2113. PDF Solutions, Inc. $1.7 billion · Software - Application
2114. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. $1.7 billion
2115. Sila Realty Trust, Inc. $1.7 billion · REIT - Healthcare Facilities
2116. Central Securities Corporation $1.7 billion · Asset Management

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 2 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.