Accenture plc · ACN
$13.4B
$15.0B
$15.0B
$16.2B
$15.4B
$15.7B
$15.8B
$16.6B
$16.0B
$16.2B
$15.8B
$16.5B
$16.4B
$17.7B
$16.7B
$17.7B
$17.6B
$18.7B
$18.0B
$18.7B
20-quarter listed-company comparison
Information Technology Services Stocks
Information Technology Services: Accenture plc owns the largest revenue base; Keel Infrastructure Corp. has the fastest current growth.
01 · the industry itself · before any single company
How has Information Technology Services moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 8% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 7% on average over the last four reported quarters — close to flat.
TURNING · ahead 2w~Moving with the index15 of 53 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months10 are 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more
RS ↑2w · 20/53 >200d (+5) · 15/53 lead (+1) · EPS 29/51↑
Information Technology Services, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Information Technology Services, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Information Technology Services, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 53 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks
Is Information Technology Services outperforming S&P 500?
Information Technology Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 1.3% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 5.2%. 7 of 27 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. ChronoScale Holdings Corporation is the strongest against the sector itself at +110.7%.
+5.2%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+1.3%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
7/27Stocks leading S&P 500
8/27Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Information Technology Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 1.3% over 52 weeks and 5.2% over 13 weeks. 7 of 27 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 8 of 27 beat the sector itself. Accenture plc leads with revenue of $73,100 million, based on 18 of 27 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Companies
27
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$565.6B
International Business Machines Corporation
Revenue growing
15/17
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
7/27
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 27
03 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Science Applications International Corporation has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 85.3% evidence confidence.
Genpact Limited looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
CDW Corporation has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Science Applications International CorporationSAIC | 67.6/100Favorable setup85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.5/35 Revenue -2.9% · PAT 14.7% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence | 12.6/25 ROCE 4.5% · OPM 9.4% 76% evidence | 15.7/20 P/E 10.8× · PEG 0.44 65% evidence | 17.8/20 RS sector 8.2% · RS bench 6% · 1Y 3.2%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.5 + 12.6 + 15.7 + 17.8 = 67.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.JKHY | 59.6/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 21.6/35 Revenue 8.4% · PAT 21.2% · OPM change 0.7 pp 83% evidence | 16.1/25 ROCE 6% · OPM 24.4% 76% evidence | 11.7/20 P/E 22.1× · PEG 1.01 65% evidence | 10.2/20 RS sector -9.5% · RS bench -11.8% · 1Y -3.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.6 + 16.1 + 11.7 + 10.2 = 59.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.BR | 58.8/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 20.4/35 Revenue 8.2% · PAT 39.6% · OPM change -0.6 pp 83% evidence | 15.4/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 18.4% 76% evidence | 14.8/20 P/E 17.4× · PEG 0.43 65% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector -20.2% · RS bench -22.8% · 1Y -36.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.4 + 15.4 + 14.8 + 8.2 = 58.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Gartner, Inc.IT | 57.8/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 16.2/35 Revenue 2.3% · PAT -41% · OPM change 2.8 pp 83% evidence | 16.9/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 20.9% 76% evidence | 14.3/20 P/E 15.6× · PEG 0.45 65% evidence | 10.4/20 RS sector -12.3% · RS bench -15.3% · 1Y -18.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.2 + 16.9 + 14.3 + 10.4 = 57.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Penguin Solutions, Inc.PENG | 57.7/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence | LEADER | 24.6/35 Revenue 12% · PAT — · OPM change 7.6 pp 71% evidence | 10.2/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 10.6% 76% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 39.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.3/20 RS sector 67% · RS bench 67.3% · 1Y 148.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.6 + 10.2 + 8.6 + 14.3 = 57.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Innodata Inc.INOD | 56.2/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | FADING | 24.0/35 Revenue 40.1% · PAT 11.4% · OPM change 4.6 pp 83% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 14.9% · OPM 18.8% 76% evidence | 3.9/20 P/E 34.8× · PEG 5.17 65% evidence | 11.9/20 RS sector 5.5% · RS bench 3.2% · 1Y 61.3%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24 + 16.4 + 3.9 + 11.9 = 56.2 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 7ExlService Holdings, Inc.EXLS | 55.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 19.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.4 pp 45% evidence | 15.9/25 ROCE 7% · OPM 16.1% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 16.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.3/20 RS sector -11.1% · RS bench -13.9% · 1Y -18.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.2 + 15.9 + 9.9 + 10.3 = 55.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Ingram Micro Holding CorporationINGM | 53.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 18.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0 pp 45% evidence | 10.4/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 1.6% 76% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 15× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.0/20 RS sector 12.6% · RS bench 10.9% · 1Y 55.8%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.9 + 10.4 + 10.3 + 14 = 53.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9CGI Inc.GIB | 51.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.4 pp 45% evidence | 13.2/25 ROCE 4.3% · OPM 14.9% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 11.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.1/20 RS sector -14.7% · RS bench -17.2% · 1Y -22.4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 13.2 + 11 + 9.1 = 51.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 10Genpact LimitedG | 50.8/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 15.1/35 Revenue 6.4% · PAT 8% · OPM change 0.2 pp 83% evidence | 14.2/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 15.3% 76% evidence | 13.1/20 P/E 11.4× · PEG 1.01 65% evidence | 8.4/20 RS sector -15.7% · RS bench -18.2% · 1Y -17.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 14.2 + 13.1 + 8.4 = 50.8 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 11ChronoScale Holdings CorporationCHRN | 50.0/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | LEADER | 20.0/35 Revenue -164.9% · PAT — · OPM change 55.9 pp 62% evidence | 3.7/25 ROCE -112.9% · OPM -58.5% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.8/20 RS sector 110.7% · RS bench 112.4% · 1Y 717.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20 + 3.7 + 11.5 + 14.8 = 50 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Cognizant Technology Solutions CorporationCTSH | 48.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 15.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.1 pp 45% evidence | 14.6/25 ROCE 5.1% · OPM 15.6% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 8.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -20.3% · RS bench -22.9% · 1Y -19.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.6 + 14.6 + 11.4 + 7.2 = 48.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13CDW CorporationCDW | 46.9/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 13.9/35 Revenue 7.4% · PAT -0.8% · OPM change -0.4 pp 83% evidence | 11.3/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 6.6% 76% evidence | 6.0/20 P/E 14.7× · PEG 4.79 65% evidence | 15.7/20 RS sector 2.2% · RS bench -0.3% · 1Y -5.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.9 + 11.3 + 6 + 15.7 = 46.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is -0.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 14CACI International IncCACI | 45.9/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 18.0/35 Revenue 9.6% · PAT 12.6% · OPM change 0.6 pp 83% evidence | 10.6/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM 9.7% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 22.4× · PEG 1.56 65% evidence | 8.0/20 RS sector -11.3% · RS bench -13.4% · 1Y 5.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 10.6 + 9.3 + 8 = 45.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Leidos Holdings, Inc.LDOS | 44.5/100Mixed-negative evidence68% evidence | BASING | 13.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 45% evidence | 12.1/25 ROCE 4.5% · OPM 11.5% 76% evidence | 14.5/20 P/E 14.5× · PEG 0.52 65% evidence | 4.4/20 RS sector -26.5% · RS bench -28.8% · 1Y -26%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.5 + 12.1 + 14.5 + 4.4 = 44.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 16Cipher Digital Inc.CIFR | 43.3/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | FADING | 17.5/35 Revenue 38.8% · PAT — · OPM change -251.1 pp 62% evidence | 4.2/25 ROCE -3.9% · OPM -328.9% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 83× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector 10% · RS bench 8.2% · 1Y 329.1%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.5 + 4.2 + 8.5 + 13.1 = 43.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 8.2%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 17EPAM Systems, Inc.EPAM | 41.9/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 18.6/35 Revenue 14.2% · PAT -5.8% · OPM change 0.7 pp 83% evidence | 10.8/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 8.3% 76% evidence | 6.4/20 P/E 19.4× · PEG 2.74 65% evidence | 6.1/20 RS sector -29.6% · RS bench -32.2% · 1Y -29.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 10.8 + 6.4 + 6.1 = 41.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18International Business Machines CorporationIBM | 40.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.6 pp 45% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM 11.7% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 25× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.1/20 RS sector -19.4% · RS bench -21.5% · 1Y -2.9%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.4 + 9.8 + 9 + 5.1 = 40.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.FIS | 39.8/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | BASING | 12.7/35 Revenue 12.3% · PAT -257.8% · OPM change -0.9 pp 83% evidence | 9.4/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 12.8% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 9.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.5/20 RS sector -25.9% · RS bench -28.3% · 1Y -37.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.7 + 9.4 + 11.2 + 6.5 = 39.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Keel Infrastructure Corp.KEEL | 39.8/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | FADING | 12.9/35 Revenue 51.6% · PAT — · OPM change -192.9 pp 62% evidence | 3.9/25 ROCE -11.6% · OPM -266% 76% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 20.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.5/20 RS sector 17.7% · RS bench 15.9% · 1Y 231.5%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.9 + 3.9 + 9.5 + 13.5 = 39.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 15.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 21Pony AI Inc.PONY | 39.8/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence | BASING | 24.6/35 Revenue 41.6% · PAT — · OPM change 230.6 pp 62% evidence | 4.0/25 ROCE -4.5% · OPM -170.3% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 1.2/20 RS sector -42.4% · RS bench -44.7% · 1Y -45.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.6 + 4 + 10 + 1.2 = 39.8 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -42.4% and the one-year return is -45.4%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 22Accenture plcACN | 39.2/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | BASING | 12.2/35 Revenue 6.7% · PAT -2% · OPM change 0.2 pp 95% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 6.9% · OPM 17% 76% evidence | 6.3/20 P/E 14.9× · PEG 3.4 65% evidence | 4.9/20 RS sector -27.5% · RS bench -29.9% · 1Y -28.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.2 + 15.8 + 6.3 + 4.9 = 39.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Applied Digital CorporationAPLD | 37.6/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | FADING | 16.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -31.8 pp 45% evidence | 4.5/25 ROCE -2.5% · OPM -67.6% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 6.4/20 RS sector -4.6% · RS bench -6.4% · 1Y 120.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 4.5 + 10 + 6.4 = 37.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.KD | 35.2/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | TURNING | 11.9/35 Revenue 0.2% · PAT -21.4% · OPM change 0.6 pp 83% evidence | 7.1/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM 4.3% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 15.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.0/20 RS sector -32.4% · RS bench -35.3% · 1Y -52.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.9 + 7.1 + 10.2 + 6 = 35.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25Parsons CorporationPSN | 34.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 13.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.6 pp 45% evidence | 9.0/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM 6.4% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 36.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.1/20 RS sector -32.2% · RS bench -34.2% · 1Y -37.4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.9 + 9 + 8.8 + 3.1 = 34.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26Wise Group plcWSE | 43.6/100Thin evidence · provisional49% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -7.3 pp 19% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 0% · OPM 30.1% 76% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 24.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.5/20 RS sector -10.7% · RS bench -12.5% · 1Y -10.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.2 + 11.7 + 9.2 + 6.5 = 43.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27NIQ Global Intelligence plcNIQ | 37.5/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | TURNING | 16.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2.6 pp 39% evidence | 4.9/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM -1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 6.5/20 RS sector -17.6% · RS bench -20.3% · 1Y -34.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.1 + 4.9 + 10 + 6.5 = 37.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Showing 10 of 27 companies
04 · what price has already done
Market action
ChronoScale Holdings Corporation has the strongest one-year price move in Information Technology Services at +717.7%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +112.4%. 7 of 27 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.
Price and relative strength
Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Information Technology Services itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
05 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Accenture plc has the highest Revenue among the 27 Information Technology Services companies compared here, at $73,100 million. CDW Corporation is next at $22,905 million. Keel Infrastructure Corp. has the highest Revenue growth at 51.6%, so level and change sit with different companies. 18 of 27 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Accenture plc is the scale leader at $73,100 million, 219.1% ahead of CDW Corporation. Keel Infrastructure Corp.'s growth is 51.6% from a $235 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderAccenture plc · $73,100 million
Gap219.1% versus #2 · CDW Corporation
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage18/27 companies · 479 observations
Investor read: Accenture plc is the scale benchmark; Keel Infrastructure Corp. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Accenture plc's growth falls below Keel Infrastructure Corp.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
Revenue growthfastest growers
Revenue · company comparison
18/27 level · 17/27 change
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. · BR
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.5B
$1.7B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.6B
$1.8B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.7B
$1.9B
$1.4B
$1.6B
$1.8B
$2.1B
$1.6B
$1.7B
$2.0B
—
CACI International Inc · CACI
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.6B
$1.6B
$1.6B
$1.6B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.9B
$1.8B
$1.9B
$2.0B
$2.1B
$2.1B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$2.3B
$2.2B
$2.4B
—
CDW Corporation · CDW
$5.3B
$5.5B
$5.9B
$6.1B
$6.2B
$5.4B
$5.1B
$5.6B
$5.6B
$5.0B
$4.9B
$5.4B
$5.5B
$5.2B
$5.2B
$6.0B
$5.7B
$5.5B
$5.7B
—
CGI Inc. · GIB
$3.0B
$3.1B
$3.3B
$3.3B
$3.2B
$3.5B
$3.7B
$3.6B
$3.5B
$3.6B
$3.7B
$3.7B
$3.7B
$3.8B
$4.0B
$4.1B
$4.0B
$4.1B
$4.2B
—
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation · CTSH
$4.7B
$4.8B
$4.8B
$4.9B
$4.9B
$4.8B
$4.8B
$4.9B
$4.9B
$4.8B
$4.8B
$4.9B
$5.0B
$5.1B
$5.1B
$5.2B
$5.4B
$5.3B
$5.4B
—
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. · FIS
$3.5B
$3.7B
$3.5B
$3.7B
$2.4B
$2.5B
$2.4B
$2.4B
$2.5B
$2.5B
$2.5B
$2.5B
$2.6B
$2.6B
$2.5B
$2.6B
$2.7B
$2.8B
$3.3B
—
Gartner, Inc. · IT
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.5B
$1.4B
$1.5B
$1.4B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.7B
$1.5B
$1.7B
$1.5B
$1.8B
$1.5B
—
International Business Machines Corporation · IBM
$13.3B
$16.7B
$14.2B
$15.5B
$14.1B
$16.7B
$14.5B
$15.5B
$14.8B
$17.4B
$14.5B
$15.8B
$15.0B
$17.6B
$14.5B
$17.0B
$16.3B
$19.7B
$15.9B
—
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. · JKHY
$488M
$494M
$478M
$483M
$529M
$505M
$509M
$535M
$571M
$546M
$539M
$560M
$601M
$574M
$585M
$615M
$645M
$619M
$636M
—
Leidos Holdings, Inc. · LDOS
$3.4B
$3.5B
—
$3.5B
$3.6B
$3.7B
$3.7B
$3.8B
$3.9B
$4.0B
$4.0B
$4.1B
$4.2B
—
$4.4B
$4.2B
$4.3B
$4.5B
$4.2B
$4.4B
Wise Group plc · WSE
$172M
$194M
$194M
$232M
$232M
$363M
$363M
$400M
$400M
—
—
$540M
$540M
—
—
$593M
$593M
—
—
—
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Accenture plc · ACN
—
—
—
—
15%
5.2%
5.1%
2.5%
3.6%
3.0%
-0.1%
-0.6%
2.6%
9.0%
5.4%
7.7%
7.3%
6.0%
8.3%
5.6%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. · BR
—
—
—
12%
7.5%
2.6%
7.3%
6.7%
12%
8.7%
4.9%
5.7%
-0.6%
13%
4.9%
6.2%
12%
7.9%
7.8%
—
CACI International Inc · CACI
—
—
—
5.0%
7.7%
11%
10%
3.7%
15%
11%
11%
20%
11%
15%
12%
13%
11%
5.7%
8.5%
—
CDW Corporation · CDW
—
—
—
19%
17%
-1.8%
-14%
-8.5%
-9.5%
-7.7%
-4.5%
-3.6%
-2.0%
3.3%
6.7%
10%
4.0%
6.3%
9.3%
—
CGI Inc. · GIB
—
—
—
7.9%
8.0%
12%
14%
11%
8.0%
4.4%
0.7%
1.4%
4.4%
5.1%
7.5%
11%
9.7%
7.7%
3.3%
—
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation · CTSH
—
—
—
7.0%
2.4%
1.3%
-0.3%
-0.4%
0.8%
-1.7%
-1.1%
-0.7%
3.0%
6.8%
7.5%
8.1%
7.4%
4.9%
5.8%
—
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. · FIS
—
—
—
7.0%
-31%
-31%
-31%
-35%
3.2%
-0.5%
3.0%
2.7%
3.1%
3.4%
2.6%
5.1%
5.7%
8.2%
30%
—
Gartner, Inc. · IT
—
—
—
18%
15%
15%
12%
9.2%
5.8%
5.4%
4.5%
6.1%
5.3%
8.1%
4.1%
5.7%
2.7%
2.2%
-1.5%
—
International Business Machines Corporation · IBM
—
—
—
9.3%
6.5%
-0.0%
2.4%
-0.4%
4.6%
4.1%
-0.5%
1.9%
1.5%
1.0%
0.6%
7.7%
9.1%
12%
9.5%
—
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. · JKHY
—
—
—
7.3%
8.4%
2.2%
6.5%
11%
7.9%
8.1%
5.9%
4.7%
5.3%
5.1%
8.5%
9.8%
7.3%
7.8%
8.7%
—
Leidos Holdings, Inc. · LDOS
—
—
—
—
4.3%
6.1%
—
9.9%
9.0%
7.7%
7.5%
7.7%
6.9%
—
9.8%
2.7%
1.5%
—
-3.6%
3.7%
Wise Group plc · WSE
39%
23%
23%
35%
35%
87%
87%
72%
72%
—
—
35%
35%
—
—
9.8%
9.8%
—
—
—
06 · compare level, then change
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
Wise Group plc has the highest OPM among the 27 Information Technology Services companies compared here, at 30.1%. Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. is next at 24.4%. Pony AI Inc. has the highest Margin change at +230.6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 27 of 27 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Wise Group plc leads opm at 30.1%; Pony AI Inc. leads margin change at +230.6 percentage points.
LeaderWise Group plc · 30.1%
Gap23.4% versus #2 · Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage27/27 companies · 476 observations
Investor read: Wise Group plc sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
Margin changefastest expanders
Operating margin · company comparison
27/27 level · 27/27 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wise Group plc WSE | 30% | −7.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. JKHY | 24% | +0.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Gartner, Inc. IT | 21% | +2.8 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Innodata Inc. INOD | 19% | +4.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. BR | 18% | −0.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Accenture plc ACN | 17% | +0.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| ExlService Holdings, Inc. EXLS | 16% | +0.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation CTSH | 16% | −1.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Genpact Limited G | 15% | +0.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| CGI Inc. GIB | 15% | +0.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. FIS | 13% | −0.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| International Business Machines Corporation IBM | 12% | +0.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. LDOS | 12% | −1.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Penguin Solutions, Inc. PENG | 11% | +7.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| CACI International Inc CACI | 9.7% | +0.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Science Applications International Corporation SAIC | 9.4% | +3.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| EPAM Systems, Inc. EPAM | 8.3% | +0.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| CDW Corporation CDW | 6.6% | −0.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Parsons Corporation PSN | 6.4% | −0.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. KD | 4.3% | +0.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Ingram Micro Holding Corporation INGM | 1.6% | 0.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| NIQ Global Intelligence plc NIQ | -1.0% | −2.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| ChronoScale Holdings Corporation CHRN | -59% | +55.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Applied Digital Corporation APLD | -68% | −31.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Pony AI Inc. PONY | -170% | +230.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Keel Infrastructure Corp. KEEL | -266% | −192.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Cipher Digital Inc. CIFR | -329% | −251.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Accenture plc · ACN
15%
16%
14%
16%
15%
17%
12%
14%
12%
16%
13%
16%
14%
17%
14%
17%
12%
15%
14%
17%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. · BR
8.7%
5.5%
16%
20%
6.8%
8.3%
17%
25%
10%
8.9%
18%
23%
9.4%
13%
19%
24%
12%
12%
18%
—
CACI International Inc · CACI
8.5%
8.4%
7.9%
7.3%
8.3%
7.9%
8.9%
8.7%
7.4%
7.3%
9.4%
9.7%
8.7%
8.6%
9.1%
9.0%
9.3%
9.3%
9.7%
—
CDW Corporation · CDW
7.3%
6.1%
6.5%
7.1%
7.5%
8.2%
7.0%
7.3%
8.5%
8.7%
6.7%
8.0%
8.7%
7.9%
7.0%
7.0%
7.7%
7.8%
6.6%
—
CGI Inc. · GIB
15%
16%
15%
15%
15%
15%
15%
15%
16%
15%
15%
16%
16%
16%
15%
14%
13%
15%
15%
—
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation · CTSH
15%
15%
15%
16%
16%
14%
15%
12%
14%
15%
15%
15%
15%
15%
17%
16%
16%
34%
16%
—
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. · FIS
3.9%
12%
4.5%
10%
16%
13%
13%
15%
19%
13%
14%
15%
19%
19%
14%
16%
17%
19%
13%
—
Gartner, Inc. · IT
20%
14%
17%
22%
19%
22%
29%
19%
17%
19%
19%
20%
17%
19%
18%
19%
5.7%
19%
21%
—
International Business Machines Corporation · IBM
8.3%
19%
6.6%
13%
-30%
22%
11%
16%
16%
24%
10%
17%
-2.5%
21%
11%
18%
18%
24%
12%
—
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. · JKHY
27%
25%
23%
22%
27%
21%
21%
23%
23%
22%
21%
22%
25%
21%
24%
25%
29%
26%
24%
—
Leidos Holdings, Inc. · LDOS
7.8%
8.8%
—
7.8%
7.5%
7.2%
7.2%
8.6%
-8.6%
9.1%
10%
12%
12%
—
9.6%
13%
13%
12%
11%
12%
Wise Group plc · WSE
8.3%
9.1%
9.1%
13%
13%
18%
18%
31%
31%
—
—
37%
37%
—
—
30%
30%
—
—
—
Margin change · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Accenture plc · ACN
—
—
—
—
+0.1 pp
+0.2 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.9 pp
−2.7 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.8 pp
+2.3 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.8 pp
−2.7 pp
−1.4 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.2 pp
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. · BR
—
—
—
+1.4 pp
−1.9 pp
+2.8 pp
+1.4 pp
+4.9 pp
+3.6 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.1 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+4.4 pp
+1.5 pp
+1.4 pp
+2.5 pp
−1.3 pp
−0.6 pp
—
CACI International Inc · CACI
—
—
—
+0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.5 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.4 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.6 pp
+0.5 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.3 pp
+1.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.6 pp
—
CDW Corporation · CDW
—
—
—
−0.1 pp
+0.2 pp
+2.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.8 pp
+0.3 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.4 pp
—
CGI Inc. · GIB
—
—
—
+0.1 pp
−0.4 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.9 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.3 pp
+1.0 pp
−0.9 pp
−2.7 pp
−3.3 pp
−0.9 pp
+0.4 pp
—
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation · CTSH
—
—
—
+0.3 pp
+1.0 pp
−1.1 pp
−0.4 pp
−3.7 pp
−2.4 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
+2.8 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.4 pp
+2.1 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.4 pp
+18.9 pp
−1.1 pp
—
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. · FIS
—
—
—
−0.3 pp
+12.0 pp
+1.3 pp
+8.5 pp
+4.4 pp
+3.0 pp
−0.3 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
+6.0 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.7 pp
−2.3 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.9 pp
—
Gartner, Inc. · IT
—
—
—
−1.9 pp
−0.9 pp
+7.9 pp
+11.8 pp
−2.8 pp
−1.7 pp
−3.1 pp
−10.4 pp
+1.2 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.6 pp
−10.9 pp
+0.6 pp
+2.8 pp
—
International Business Machines Corporation · IBM
—
—
—
+4.6 pp
−38.1 pp
+2.7 pp
+4.5 pp
+2.7 pp
+45.3 pp
+2.3 pp
−0.7 pp
+1.1 pp
−18.0 pp
−2.8 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.5 pp
+20.4 pp
+2.3 pp
+0.6 pp
—
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. · JKHY
—
—
—
+0.1 pp
−0.8 pp
−4.2 pp
−2.0 pp
+1.7 pp
−3.4 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.8 pp
+2.0 pp
−0.4 pp
+2.9 pp
+2.9 pp
+3.3 pp
+4.3 pp
+0.7 pp
—
Leidos Holdings, Inc. · LDOS
—
—
—
—
−0.3 pp
−1.6 pp
—
+0.8 pp
−16.1 pp
+1.9 pp
+3.2 pp
+2.9 pp
+20.9 pp
—
−0.8 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.1 pp
—
+1.6 pp
−1.0 pp
Wise Group plc · WSE
−3.2 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.9 pp
+4.9 pp
+4.9 pp
+9.2 pp
+9.2 pp
+17.8 pp
+17.8 pp
—
—
+6.4 pp
+6.4 pp
—
—
−7.3 pp
−7.3 pp
—
—
—
07 · compare level, then change
Profit Scale & Acceleration
Accenture plc has the highest Net profit among the 27 Information Technology Services companies compared here, at $7,939 million. Leidos Holdings, Inc. is next at $1,432 million. Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has the highest Profit growth at 39.6%, so level and change sit with different companies. 18 of 27 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Accenture plc leads with $7,939 million of TTM profit, 454.4% above Leidos Holdings, Inc.. Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. shows 39.6% growth from a $1,100 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderAccenture plc · $7,939 million
Gap454.4% versus #2 · Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage18/27 companies · 485 observations
Investor read: Accenture plc sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
Profit growthfastest growers
Net profit · company comparison
18/27 level · 12/27 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Accenture plc · ACN
$1.4B
$1.8B
$1.7B
$1.8B
$1.7B
$2.0B
$1.6B
$2.0B
$1.4B
$2.0B
$1.7B
$2.0B
$1.7B
$2.3B
$1.8B
$2.2B
$1.5B
$2.2B
$1.9B
$2.4B
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. · BR
$67M
$47M
$177M
$248M
$50M
$58M
$199M
$324M
$91M
$70M
$214M
$323M
$80M
$142M
$243M
$374M
$165M
$285M
$276M
—
CACI International Inc · CACI
$88M
$90M
$95M
$93M
$89M
$87M
$101M
$108M
$86M
$84M
$115M
$135M
$120M
$110M
$112M
$158M
$125M
$124M
$130M
—
CDW Corporation · CDW
$267M
$215M
$250M
$279M
$298M
$287M
$230M
$263M
$316M
$296M
$216M
$281M
$316M
$264M
$225M
$271M
$291M
$280M
$235M
—
CGI Inc. · GIB
$346M
$367M
$372M
$364M
$362M
$382M
$419M
$415M
$414M
$390M
$427M
$440M
$436M
$439M
$430M
$409M
$381M
$442M
$445M
—
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation · CTSH
$544M
$575M
$559M
$577M
$629M
$521M
$580M
$463M
$522M
$554M
$543M
$563M
$582M
$546M
$659M
$645M
$274M
$1.8B
$659M
—
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. · FIS
$161M
$-6M
$121M
$280M
$222M
$79M
$96M
$161M
$249M
$62M
$86M
$228M
$280M
$341M
$71M
$129M
$288M
$345M
$-2.2B
—
Gartner, Inc. · IT
$149M
$209M
$173M
$205M
$174M
$257M
$296M
$198M
$180M
$209M
$211M
$230M
$415M
$399M
$211M
$241M
$35M
$242M
$222M
—
International Business Machines Corporation · IBM
$1.0B
$2.5B
$662M
$1.5B
$-3.2B
$2.9B
$1.1B
$1.6B
$1.7B
$3.3B
$1.6B
$1.8B
$-317M
$2.9B
$1.1B
$2.2B
$1.7B
$5.6B
$1.2B
—
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. · JKHY
$102M
$96M
$85M
$80M
$107M
$81M
$82M
$98M
$102M
$92M
$87M
$101M
$119M
$98M
$111M
$128M
$144M
$125M
$123M
—
Leidos Holdings, Inc. · LDOS
$170M
$208M
—
$177M
$172M
$180M
$164M
$210M
$-396M
$230M
$283M
$324M
$362M
—
$282M
$365M
$393M
$369M
$335M
$335M
Wise Group plc · WSE
$9M
$13M
$13M
$21M
$21M
$50M
$50M
$86M
$86M
—
—
$145M
$145M
—
—
$126M
$126M
—
—
—
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 24 companies with a series here. The remaining 12 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Accenture plc · ACN
—
—
—
—
18%
9.7%
-6.5%
13%
-17%
0.7%
10%
-3.3%
22%
15%
6.6%
13%
-16%
-3.2%
2.0%
6.4%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. · BR
—
—
—
-4.6%
-25%
23%
12%
31%
82%
21%
7.5%
-0.3%
-12%
103%
14%
16%
106%
101%
14%
—
CACI International Inc · CACI
—
—
—
-32%
1.1%
-3.3%
6.3%
16%
-3.4%
-3.5%
14%
25%
40%
31%
-2.6%
17%
4.2%
13%
16%
—
CDW Corporation · CDW
—
—
—
1.8%
12%
33%
-8.0%
-5.7%
6.0%
3.1%
-6.1%
6.8%
0.0%
-11%
4.2%
-3.6%
-7.9%
6.1%
4.4%
—
CGI Inc. · GIB
—
—
—
7.7%
4.6%
4.1%
13%
14%
14%
2.1%
1.9%
6.0%
5.3%
13%
0.7%
-7.1%
-13%
0.7%
3.5%
—
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation · CTSH
—
—
—
13%
16%
-9.4%
3.8%
-20%
-17%
6.3%
-6.4%
22%
11%
-1.4%
21%
15%
-53%
234%
0.0%
—
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. · FIS
—
—
—
—
38%
—
-21%
-43%
12%
-22%
-10%
42%
12%
450%
-17%
-43%
2.9%
1.2%
-3,218%
—
Gartner, Inc. · IT
—
—
—
-24%
17%
23%
71%
-3.4%
3.5%
-19%
-29%
16%
131%
91%
0.0%
4.8%
-92%
-39%
5.2%
—
International Business Machines Corporation · IBM
—
—
—
81%
-410%
17%
59%
7.9%
—
14%
49%
16%
-118%
-11%
-33%
20%
—
91%
15%
—
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. · JKHY
—
—
—
3.9%
4.9%
-16%
-3.5%
23%
-4.7%
14%
6.1%
3.1%
17%
6.5%
28%
27%
21%
28%
11%
—
Leidos Holdings, Inc. · LDOS
—
—
—
—
1.2%
-13%
—
19%
-330%
28%
73%
54%
—
—
-0.4%
13%
8.6%
—
19%
-8.2%
Wise Group plc · WSE
0.0%
18%
18%
133%
133%
285%
285%
310%
310%
—
—
69%
69%
—
—
-13%
-13%
—
—
—
08 · compare level, then change
Return On Capital Employed
Innodata Inc. has the highest ROCE among the 27 Information Technology Services companies compared here, at 14.9%. Gartner, Inc. is next at 7.5%. ChronoScale Holdings Corporation has the highest ROCE change at +74.8 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 27 of 27 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Innodata Inc. leads ROCE at 14.9%, 7.4 percentage points above Gartner, Inc.. ChronoScale Holdings Corporation has the strongest latest improvement at +74.8 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderInnodata Inc. · 14.9%
Gap98.7% versus #2 · Gartner, Inc.
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage27/27 companies · 494 observations
Investor read: Innodata Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
ROCE changefastest improvers
Return on capital · company comparison
27/27 level · 27/27 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Innodata Inc. INOD | 15% | +1.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Gartner, Inc. IT | 7.5% | +1.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| ExlService Holdings, Inc. EXLS | 7.0% | +0.9 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Accenture plc ACN | 6.9% | −0.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. JKHY | 6.0% | +0.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. BR | 5.2% | +0.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation CTSH | 5.1% | +0.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Genpact Limited G | 4.8% | 0.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. LDOS | 4.5% | −0.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Science Applications International Corporation SAIC | 4.5% | +1.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| CGI Inc. GIB | 4.3% | +0.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| CDW Corporation CDW | 4.2% | 0.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Penguin Solutions, Inc. PENG | 4.2% | +3.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Ingram Micro Holding Corporation INGM | 3.1% | +1.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| EPAM Systems, Inc. EPAM | 3.0% | +0.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| International Business Machines Corporation IBM | 2.6% | −0.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| CACI International Inc CACI | 2.6% | −0.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. KD | 2.6% | +0.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. FIS | 1.4% | +0.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Parsons Corporation PSN | 0.1% | −2.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Wise Group plc WSE | 0.0% | 0.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| NIQ Global Intelligence plc NIQ | -0.4% | +1.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Applied Digital Corporation APLD | -2.5% | +3.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Cipher Digital Inc. CIFR | -3.9% | +1.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Pony AI Inc. PONY | -4.5% | +2.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Keel Infrastructure Corp. KEEL | -12% | −5.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| ChronoScale Holdings Corporation CHRN | -113% | +74.8 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Accenture plc · ACN
—
9.0%
7.5%
9.2%
7.9%
8.8%
6.5%
7.5%
6.1%
7.9%
6.2%
7.6%
6.7%
7.7%
5.8%
7.4%
5.0%
6.6%
5.6%
6.9%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. · BR
1.9%
1.2%
4.3%
5.0%
1.2%
1.5%
4.0%
7.2%
2.1%
1.8%
4.2%
7.0%
1.9%
3.0%
4.9%
7.4%
2.7%
2.9%
5.2%
—
CACI International Inc · CACI
2.4%
2.3%
2.3%
2.2%
2.4%
2.3%
2.8%
2.7%
2.5%
2.4%
3.2%
3.5%
3.0%
2.8%
3.0%
3.1%
3.1%
2.7%
2.6%
—
CDW Corporation · CDW
7.3%
5.0%
5.8%
6.5%
7.0%
5.5%
4.4%
5.1%
5.9%
5.4%
4.1%
5.6%
5.7%
4.8%
4.2%
5.0%
4.8%
4.8%
4.2%
—
CGI Inc. · GIB
4.0%
4.4%
4.7%
4.5%
4.3%
4.6%
5.1%
4.9%
4.9%
4.6%
5.0%
5.1%
4.9%
4.7%
4.4%
4.1%
3.7%
4.3%
4.2%
4.3%
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation · CTSH
5.0%
5.3%
5.2%
5.5%
5.7%
4.8%
4.8%
4.0%
4.7%
4.9%
4.6%
4.6%
4.7%
4.8%
5.3%
5.0%
5.2%
11%
5.0%
5.1%
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. · FIS
0.2%
0.6%
0.2%
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
0.5%
0.7%
0.9%
0.8%
0.9%
1.1%
1.5%
1.5%
1.2%
1.5%
1.7%
2.0%
1.4%
—
Gartner, Inc. · IT
5.5%
4.4%
5.5%
7.7%
6.7%
8.6%
11%
7.6%
6.6%
7.8%
6.9%
8.0%
5.9%
7.4%
6.3%
7.5%
2.1%
7.8%
7.5%
—
International Business Machines Corporation · IBM
1.0%
3.0%
0.9%
2.0%
-4.1%
3.7%
1.6%
2.5%
2.4%
4.2%
1.5%
2.6%
-0.4%
3.6%
1.5%
2.9%
2.7%
4.3%
1.6%
2.6%
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. · JKHY
7.1%
6.5%
5.8%
5.6%
7.1%
5.3%
5.1%
6.0%
6.1%
5.3%
4.8%
5.5%
6.5%
5.2%
5.7%
6.5%
7.4%
6.3%
6.0%
—
Leidos Holdings, Inc. · LDOS
—
3.2%
—
2.8%
2.9%
2.8%
2.7%
3.5%
-3.6%
3.8%
4.2%
4.9%
5.4%
—
4.4%
5.3%
5.7%
5.3%
4.7%
4.5%
Wise Group plc · WSE
3.0%
2.9%
2.9%
4.5%
4.5%
9.2%
9.2%
15%
15%
0.0%
0.0%
15%
15%
0.0%
0.0%
8.7%
8.7%
0.0%
0.0%
—
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Accenture plc · ACN
—
—
—
—
—
−0.2 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.7 pp
−1.8 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.2 pp
−1.7 pp
−1.1 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.5 pp
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. · BR
—
—
—
—
−0.7 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.3 pp
+2.2 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.2 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.8 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
—
CACI International Inc · CACI
—
—
—
—
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.4 pp
—
CDW Corporation · CDW
—
—
—
—
−0.3 pp
+0.5 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.1 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.6 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.9 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
—
CGI Inc. · GIB
—
—
—
—
+0.3 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.6 pp
0.0 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.2 pp
0.0 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.6 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.2 pp
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation · CTSH
—
—
—
—
+0.7 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.4 pp
−1.5 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.6 pp
0.0 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.5 pp
+6.0 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.1 pp
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. · FIS
—
—
—
—
+0.4 pp
0.0 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.2 pp
—
Gartner, Inc. · IT
—
—
—
—
+1.2 pp
+4.2 pp
+5.2 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.8 pp
−3.8 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.5 pp
−3.8 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.2 pp
—
International Business Machines Corporation · IBM
—
—
—
—
−5.1 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.5 pp
+6.5 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
−2.8 pp
−0.6 pp
0.0 pp
+0.3 pp
+3.1 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.3 pp
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. · JKHY
—
—
—
—
0.0 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.4 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.5 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.9 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.9 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.3 pp
—
Leidos Holdings, Inc. · LDOS
—
—
—
—
—
−0.4 pp
—
+0.7 pp
−6.5 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.5 pp
+1.4 pp
+9.0 pp
—
+0.2 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.3 pp
—
+0.3 pp
−0.8 pp
Wise Group plc · WSE
—
—
—
—
+1.5 pp
+6.3 pp
+6.3 pp
+10.2 pp
+10.2 pp
−9.2 pp
−9.2 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.5 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−6.5 pp
−6.5 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
—
09 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 27 Information Technology Services companies compared here, at 0.43×. Science Applications International Corporation is next at 0.44×. ChronoScale Holdings Corporation has the lowest P/E at 0.97×, so level and change sit with different companies. 11 of 27 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.43×, 2.3% below Science Applications International Corporation. Only 11 of 27 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. · 0.43×
Gap2.3% versus #2 · Science Applications International Corporation
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage11/27 companies · 104 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
P/Elowest P/E
Valuation · company comparison
11/27 level · 24/27 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 16 companies with a series here. The remaining 4 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Accenture plc · ACN
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3.1
—
—
—
—
4.9
2.9
2.9
1.7
3.4
—
—
—
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. · BR
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.9
1.1
1.3
1.4
3.1
—
3.1
2.7
1.6
0.9
0.6
0.4
—
CACI International Inc · CACI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3.4
3.3
2.8
2.1
1.8
1.1
0.7
0.8
1.1
1.8
2.4
1.6
—
CDW Corporation · CDW
—
—
—
—
—
—
2.4
3.4
4.8
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
CGI Inc. · GIB
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.9
1.7
1.3
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.7
2.5
2.3
2.1
—
—
—
—
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation · CTSH
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.8
—
—
—
—
—
1.8
2.4
1.2
1.3
—
—
—
—
EPAM Systems, Inc. · EPAM
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.6
1.9
—
—
—
—
2.7
—
—
—
—
—
—
Gartner, Inc. · IT
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.3
1.0
1.2
3.8
—
—
2.3
0.7
0.4
0.5
—
—
—
—
Genpact Limited · G
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.8
0.5
—
—
—
0.2
—
—
—
—
1.5
1.0
—
Ingram Micro Holding Corporation · INGM
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.9
0.7
—
International Business Machines Corporation · IBM
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.6
—
—
—
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. · JKHY
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
5.3
4.0
—
3.1
3.8
2.3
1.5
1.1
1.0
1.0
—
P/E · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 24 companies with a series here. The remaining 12 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Accenture plc · ACN
—
37.2
31.9
29.0
26.9
27.3
24.5
27.3
30.1
30.9
34.0
25.9
29.9
30.4
28.8
25.2
21.4
20.7
17.1
14.9
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. · BR
35.8
40.0
33.4
31.3
32.8
29.9
31.5
31.3
31.8
35.8
35.0
33.6
37.2
35.4
36.5
34.2
30.5
24.7
17.4
—
CACI International Inc · CACI
14.2
14.9
17.4
18.2
16.8
19.5
18.9
20.8
19.1
19.6
21.9
23.1
25.0
19.0
17.3
21.4
22.0
22.8
22.4
—
CDW Corporation · CDW
25.6
29.1
24.7
21.4
20.5
22.0
24.4
23.4
25.2
28.1
31.9
27.4
27.7
21.8
19.9
22.2
20.1
16.9
14.7
—
CGI Inc. · GIB
19.9
20.0
17.3
17.3
17.2
19.0
20.4
20.9
19.5
20.3
21.2
19.0
21.3
20.8
18.8
19.0
16.9
17.0
13.3
11.4
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation · CTSH
21.0
21.9
21.5
15.7
12.8
13.0
13.6
15.2
16.4
17.9
17.6
15.5
17.1
17.1
16.1
15.9
15.6
18.2
13.3
8.3
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. · FIS
328.9
162.9
67.9
66.4
49.4
—
—
—
—
—
—
58.4
33.8
31.0
49.5
452.3
244.2
91.0
9.1
—
Gartner, Inc. · IT
37.7
36.3
31.4
27.3
29.8
33.8
28.1
30.4
29.6
40.7
47.4
42.8
37.4
30.3
26.1
24.9
23.1
26.1
15.7
—
International Business Machines Corporation · IBM
25.0
25.7
21.5
23.2
92.1
78.3
66.9
62.2
18.6
20.1
21.6
19.1
32.1
34.2
42.7
47.7
33.8
26.5
21.4
25.0
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. · JKHY
38.1
35.8
40.4
36.4
36.3
36.4
31.5
33.3
30.5
32.0
33.5
31.7
32.3
31.6
31.1
28.9
22.6
26.2
22.1
—
Leidos Holdings, Inc. · LDOS
—
18.0
—
21.3
19.9
21.2
18.9
17.3
88.6
75.2
56.5
45.7
18.2
—
16.0
13.4
15.6
18.2
16.5
14.5
Wise Group plc · WSE
372.0
199.9
166.3
71.0
121.7
66.6
48.4
41.5
32.0
—
24.4
—
—
—
24.5
28.6
30.5
24.7
24.6
—
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Information Technology Services comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 27 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
11 · evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 27 Information Technology Services companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers
Information Technology Services company comparison FAQs
These 22 answers restate the Information Technology Services comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 27 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Information Technology Services sector outperforming S&P 500?
Information Technology Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 1.3% over 52 weeks and 5.2% over 13 weeks. 7 of 27 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 8 of 27 beat the sector itself.
Which Information Technology Services company is largest by revenue?
Accenture plc leads with revenue of $73,100 million, based on 18 of 27 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Which Information Technology Services company is growing fastest?
Keel Infrastructure Corp. has the fastest current revenue growth at 51.6%, across 17 of 27 comparable companies.
Which Information Technology Services company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Science Applications International Corporation ranks first at 67.6/100 with 85.3% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Information Technology Services company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.43, among 11 of 27 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Information Technology Services comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Which Information Technology Services company is the biggest?
Accenture plc is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $73,100 million, ahead of CDW Corporation at $22,905 million. That covers 18 of 27 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.
Which Information Technology Services company has the best profit margins?
Wise Group plc has the highest operating margin at 30.1%, from 27 of 27 comparable companies. Pony AI Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +230.6 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Information Technology Services company makes the most profit?
Accenture plc earns the most, at $7,939 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 18 of 27 comparable companies. Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has the fastest profit growth at 39.6%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Information Technology Services company earns the highest return on capital?
Innodata Inc. leads on return on capital employed at 14.9%, across 27 of 27 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Information Technology Services stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. screens cheapest at 0.43×. Only 11 of 27 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Information Technology Services sector beating the market?
Information Technology Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 1.3% over the last 52 weeks and 5.2% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 7 of 27 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Information Technology Services stock has the strongest price momentum?
ChronoScale Holdings Corporation has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Information Technology Services company scores highest for research priority?
Science Applications International Corporation scores 67.6 out of 100 with 85.3% evidence confidence, from 21.5 points on growth and earnings, 12.6 on capital efficiency, 15.7 on valuation and 17.8 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Information Technology Services companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 27 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Information Technology Services sector?
The 27 Information Technology Services companies on this page carry $565,586 million of combined market value. International Business Machines Corporation is the largest at $221,543 million, about 39% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.
What is the Information Technology Services sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 27 Information Technology Services companies on this page is 16.3×, measured on the 24 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.
How is the Information Technology Services sector performing?
7 of the 27 covered Information Technology Services companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 1.3% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.
How many Information Technology Services stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 27 listed Information Technology Services companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.