Lumber & Wood Production Stocks in the US
The 5 Lumber & Wood Production companies we score in the US are Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. ($8.1B, the largest), West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd., UFP Industries, Inc. and 2 more. 1 of the 5 companies we score beats S&P 500 on share price over recent months (1 has no relative-strength reading yet). Prices are as of 6 Nov 2026.
Lumber & Wood Production: Boise Cascade Company owns the largest revenue base; Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has the fastest current growth.
The main question: the biggest companies are not always the ones changing the most.
Start with size. Then the direction of earnings. Then the quality of the business. A share price that leads means more once those three agree.
Which are the biggest Lumber & Wood Production stocks in the US?
The largest Lumber & Wood Production stocks in the US by market value are Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. ($8.1B), West Fraser Timber Co. ($5.3B) and UFP Industries, Inc. ($4.4B), at prices of 6 Nov 2026.
- Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.: $196.89 | market value $8.1B | P/E 18.4
- West Fraser Timber Co.: $67.86 | market value $5.3B | P/E 3017.8
- UFP Industries, Inc.: $79.92 | market value $4.4B | P/E 19.5
- Boise Cascade Company: $70.24 | market value $2.4B | P/E 21.5
- FF Global Holdings: null | market value $106M
Share price | market value | P/E, biggest first. Prices and market values as of 6 Nov 2026; ratios as in the score list below.
Which are the Lumber & Wood Production stocks, ranked?
Ranked by the 4-Factor Sector Score (growth & earnings 35, capital efficiency 25, valuation 20, relative strength 20). Prices as of 6 Nov 2026.
- 1Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.SSD · $8.1B70.8of 100favourable · strongest on relative strength versus sector and ROCE improvement
- 2West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.WFG · $5.3B48.7of 100provisional · strongest on relative strength versus sector and margin improvement
- 3Boise Cascade CompanyBCC · $2.4B30.7of 100weak · strongest on profitable quarters and profit consistency
- 4UFP Industries, Inc.UFPI · $4.4B28.8of 100weak · strongest on profitable quarters and profit consistency
- 5FF Global Holdings LtdFFGG · $106M57.2of 100provisional · strongest on ROCE
How many Lumber & Wood Production companies are listed in the US?
4 Lumber & Wood Production companies in the Lumber & Wood Production industry group (every listed company) have a page on Sector Alpha, by market value as of 6 November 2026, and all 4 are listed below, largest first. The largest is Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. ($8.1 billion) and the smallest with a market value is Boise Cascade Company.
| Company | Market value |
|---|---|
| 1. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. SSD | $8.1 billion |
| 2. West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. WFG | $5.3 billion |
| 3. UFP Industries, Inc. UFPI | $4.4 billion |
| 4. Boise Cascade Company BCC | $2.4 billion |
How has Lumber & Wood Production moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the last two years (104 weeks) this industry is 52% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 21% on average over the last four reported quarters.
Price down, no fundamental support. 0 of the 4 companies with a long enough price record ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months.
Not ahead of S&P 500 on the three-month view this week; 2 of the 4 companies in the industry index above their 200-day average (2 more than four weeks earlier); 0 of those 4 ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months (no change from four weeks earlier); earnings rising at 1 of the 4 that report earnings.
Not ahead of S&P 500 yet, but 0 more stocks joined in four weeks, 0 → 0 of 4. Earnings not confirming, 1 of 4 members have higher trailing twelve-month earnings than a year ago.
1Y
Lumber & Wood Production against S&P 500
Both lines start at 200 in the first week shown
- Lumber & Wood Production 213
- S&P 500 219
| Week ending | Lumber & Wood Production | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Nov 2025 | 200 | 200 |
| 21 Nov 2025 | 202 | 196 |
| 28 Nov 2025 | 209 | 203 |
| 5 Dec 2025 | 206 | 204 |
| 12 Dec 2025 | 208 | 203 |
| 19 Dec 2025 | 206 | 203 |
| 26 Dec 2025 | 207 | 205 |
| 2 Jan 2026 | 207 | 203 |
| 9 Jan 2026 | 227 | 207 |
| 16 Jan 2026 | 237 | 206 |
| 23 Jan 2026 | 235 | 205 |
| 30 Jan 2026 | 227 | 206 |
| 6 Feb 2026 | 249 | 206 |
| 13 Feb 2026 | 251 | 203 |
| 20 Feb 2026 | 238 | 205 |
| 27 Feb 2026 | 232 | 204 |
| 6 Mar 2026 | 218 | 200 |
| 13 Mar 2026 | 209 | 197 |
| 20 Mar 2026 | 199 | 193 |
| 27 Mar 2026 | 209 | 189 |
| 3 Apr 2026 | 209 | 195 |
| 10 Apr 2026 | 219 | 202 |
| 17 Apr 2026 | 223 | 211 |
| 24 Apr 2026 | 224 | 213 |
| 1 May 2026 | 215 | 215 |
| 8 May 2026 | 208 | 220 |
| 15 May 2026 | 197 | 220 |
| 22 May 2026 | 202 | 222 |
| 29 May 2026 | 211 | 225 |
| 5 Jun 2026 | 206 | 220 |
| 12 Jun 2026 | 216 | 221 |
| 19 Jun 2026 | 222 | 222 |
| 26 Jun 2026 | 233 | 217 |
| 3 Jul 2026 | 225 | 222 |
| 10 Jul 2026 | 217 | 225 |
| 17 Jul 2026 | 221 | 221 |
| 24 Jul 2026 | 221 | 220 |
| 31 Jul 2026 | 216 | 222 |
| 7 Aug 2026 | 237 | 230 |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 230 | 231 |
| 21 Aug 2026 | 226 | 228 |
| 28 Aug 2026 | 218 | 229 |
| 4 Sep 2026 | 218 | 229 |
| 11 Sep 2026 | 211 | 227 |
| 18 Sep 2026 | 211 | 227 |
| 25 Sep 2026 | 214 | 230 |
| 2 Oct 2026 | 207 | 229 |
| 9 Oct 2026 | 201 | 232 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 208 | 227 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 217 | 226 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 219 | 225 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 213 | 219 |
3Y
Lumber & Wood Production against S&P 500
Both lines start at 200 in the first week shown, every 2nd week shown
- Lumber & Wood Production 175
- S&P 500 326
| Week ending | Lumber & Wood Production | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Nov 2023 | 200 | 200 |
| 24 Nov 2023 | 204 | 202 |
| 8 Dec 2023 | 208 | 204 |
| 22 Dec 2023 | 232 | 210 |
| 5 Jan 2024 | 225 | 208 |
| 19 Jan 2024 | 224 | 214 |
| 2 Feb 2024 | 225 | 219 |
| 16 Feb 2024 | 230 | 222 |
| 1 Mar 2024 | 233 | 228 |
| 15 Mar 2024 | 227 | 226 |
| 29 Mar 2024 | 246 | 232 |
| 12 Apr 2024 | 230 | 227 |
| 26 Apr 2024 | 221 | 225 |
| 10 May 2024 | 222 | 231 |
| 24 May 2024 | 227 | 235 |
| 7 Jun 2024 | 213 | 237 |
| 21 Jun 2024 | 215 | 242 |
| 5 Jul 2024 | 203 | 246 |
| 19 Jul 2024 | 224 | 244 |
| 2 Aug 2024 | 229 | 236 |
| 16 Aug 2024 | 225 | 246 |
| 30 Aug 2024 | 234 | 250 |
| 13 Sep 2024 | 235 | 249 |
| 27 Sep 2024 | 249 | 254 |
| 11 Oct 2024 | 255 | 257 |
| 25 Oct 2024 | 243 | 257 |
| 8 Nov 2024 | 247 | 265 |
| 22 Nov 2024 | 248 | 264 |
| 6 Dec 2024 | 249 | 270 |
| 20 Dec 2024 | 219 | 262 |
| 3 Jan 2025 | 216 | 263 |
| 17 Jan 2025 | 225 | 265 |
| 31 Jan 2025 | 222 | 267 |
| 14 Feb 2025 | 218 | 271 |
| 28 Feb 2025 | 202 | 264 |
| 14 Mar 2025 | 196 | 250 |
| 28 Mar 2025 | 195 | 247 |
| 11 Apr 2025 | 191 | 237 |
| 25 Apr 2025 | 191 | 244 |
| 9 May 2025 | 185 | 250 |
| 23 May 2025 | 182 | 257 |
| 6 Jun 2025 | 184 | 266 |
| 20 Jun 2025 | 182 | 264 |
| 4 Jul 2025 | 194 | 277 |
| 18 Jul 2025 | 185 | 278 |
| 1 Aug 2025 | 186 | 276 |
| 15 Aug 2025 | 194 | 285 |
| 29 Aug 2025 | 195 | 286 |
| 12 Sep 2025 | 194 | 292 |
| 26 Sep 2025 | 176 | 294 |
| 10 Oct 2025 | 171 | 290 |
| 24 Oct 2025 | 174 | 300 |
| 7 Nov 2025 | 167 | 298 |
| 21 Nov 2025 | 166 | 292 |
| 5 Dec 2025 | 170 | 304 |
| 19 Dec 2025 | 169 | 302 |
| 2 Jan 2026 | 170 | 303 |
| 16 Jan 2026 | 195 | 307 |
| 30 Jan 2026 | 186 | 307 |
| 13 Feb 2026 | 207 | 302 |
| 27 Feb 2026 | 191 | 304 |
| 13 Mar 2026 | 172 | 294 |
| 27 Mar 2026 | 172 | 281 |
| 10 Apr 2026 | 180 | 301 |
| 24 Apr 2026 | 184 | 317 |
| 8 May 2026 | 171 | 327 |
| 22 May 2026 | 166 | 331 |
| 5 Jun 2026 | 169 | 327 |
| 19 Jun 2026 | 183 | 331 |
| 3 Jul 2026 | 185 | 330 |
| 17 Jul 2026 | 182 | 330 |
| 31 Jul 2026 | 178 | 331 |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 189 | 344 |
| 28 Aug 2026 | 179 | 341 |
| 11 Sep 2026 | 174 | 339 |
| 25 Sep 2026 | 176 | 342 |
| 9 Oct 2026 | 165 | 345 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 178 | 337 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 175 | 326 |
5Y
Lumber & Wood Production against S&P 500
Both lines start at 200 in the first week shown, every 4th week shown
- Lumber & Wood Production 223
- S&P 500 314
| Week ending | Lumber & Wood Production | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Nov 2021 | 200 | 200 |
| 10 Dec 2021 | 203 | 201 |
| 7 Jan 2022 | 206 | 199 |
| 4 Feb 2022 | 198 | 191 |
| 4 Mar 2022 | 208 | 184 |
| 1 Apr 2022 | 187 | 193 |
| 29 Apr 2022 | 191 | 176 |
| 27 May 2022 | 201 | 177 |
| 24 Jun 2022 | 166 | 166 |
| 22 Jul 2022 | 196 | 169 |
| 19 Aug 2022 | 200 | 180 |
| 16 Sep 2022 | 165 | 164 |
| 14 Oct 2022 | 158 | 153 |
| 11 Nov 2022 | 186 | 170 |
| 9 Dec 2022 | 181 | 168 |
| 6 Jan 2023 | 181 | 166 |
| 3 Feb 2023 | 211 | 176 |
| 3 Mar 2023 | 194 | 172 |
| 31 Mar 2023 | 180 | 175 |
| 28 Apr 2023 | 191 | 177 |
| 26 May 2023 | 195 | 179 |
| 23 Jun 2023 | 215 | 185 |
| 21 Jul 2023 | 244 | 193 |
| 18 Aug 2023 | 241 | 186 |
| 15 Sep 2023 | 237 | 189 |
| 13 Oct 2023 | 219 | 184 |
| 10 Nov 2023 | 238 | 188 |
| 8 Dec 2023 | 265 | 196 |
| 5 Jan 2024 | 286 | 200 |
| 2 Feb 2024 | 286 | 211 |
| 1 Mar 2024 | 297 | 219 |
| 29 Mar 2024 | 313 | 223 |
| 26 Apr 2024 | 281 | 217 |
| 24 May 2024 | 289 | 226 |
| 21 Jun 2024 | 273 | 232 |
| 19 Jul 2024 | 285 | 234 |
| 16 Aug 2024 | 285 | 236 |
| 13 Sep 2024 | 299 | 240 |
| 11 Oct 2024 | 324 | 247 |
| 8 Nov 2024 | 313 | 255 |
| 6 Dec 2024 | 316 | 259 |
| 3 Jan 2025 | 275 | 253 |
| 31 Jan 2025 | 282 | 257 |
| 28 Feb 2025 | 257 | 253 |
| 28 Mar 2025 | 247 | 237 |
| 25 Apr 2025 | 243 | 235 |
| 23 May 2025 | 231 | 247 |
| 20 Jun 2025 | 231 | 253 |
| 18 Jul 2025 | 235 | 268 |
| 15 Aug 2025 | 247 | 274 |
| 12 Sep 2025 | 246 | 280 |
| 10 Oct 2025 | 217 | 279 |
| 7 Nov 2025 | 212 | 286 |
| 5 Dec 2025 | 216 | 292 |
| 2 Jan 2026 | 216 | 291 |
| 30 Jan 2026 | 237 | 295 |
| 27 Feb 2026 | 242 | 293 |
| 27 Mar 2026 | 218 | 270 |
| 24 Apr 2026 | 234 | 305 |
| 22 May 2026 | 211 | 318 |
| 19 Jun 2026 | 232 | 319 |
| 17 Jul 2026 | 231 | 317 |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 240 | 331 |
| 11 Sep 2026 | 220 | 326 |
| 9 Oct 2026 | 210 | 332 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 223 | 314 |
Earnings, each company rebased to 100, the sector takes the median
Latest quarter July to September 2026: 15.6, from 3 companies
| Quarter | Median earnings index |
|---|---|
| Jan 2022 | 100.0 (3 companies) |
| Apr 2022 | 90.2 (3 companies) |
| Jul 2022 | 102.5 (4 companies) |
| Oct 2022 | 98.5 (4 companies) |
| Jan 2023 | 75.1 (3 companies) |
| Apr 2023 | 77.9 (4 companies) |
| Jul 2023 | 76.0 (5 companies) |
| Oct 2023 | 63.7 (4 companies) |
| Jan 2024 | 56.4 (3 companies) |
| Apr 2024 | 52.6 (3 companies) |
| Jul 2024 | 56.4 (4 companies) |
| Oct 2024 | 52.3 (4 companies) |
| Jan 2025 | 36.7 (3 companies) |
| Apr 2025 | 31.2 (3 companies) |
| Jul 2025 | 23.2 (3 companies) |
| Oct 2025 | 30.4 (4 companies) |
| Jan 2026 | 66.5 (2 companies) |
| Apr 2026 | 13.5 (3 companies) |
| Jul 2026 | 15.6 (3 companies) |
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the gap between them tells the story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of 4 of its 5 companies (the 1 with too short a price record are ranked in the scorecard but cannot sit in this line). The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member set to 100 at the start and the industry taking the middle value, so a price line pulling away from flat bars means the market is paying more for the same earnings. A bar turns grey when that figure is lower than the quarter before. The rules are fixed and the same everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover or tap any point to read both values and the gap.
Is Lumber & Wood Production outperforming S&P 500?
Lumber & Wood Production has done worse than the S&P 500 by 4.1% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 5.5%. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +9.7%.
What is the bottom line on Lumber & Wood Production?
Lumber & Wood Production has done worse than the S&P 500 by 4.1% over 52 weeks and by 5.5% over 13 weeks. 1 of 5 companies we track is beating the S&P 500 on relative strength (how a share price has done against the index over recent months) (1 has no relative-strength reading yet), and 2 of the 4 with a long enough price history are ahead of the industry itself.
How does each Lumber & Wood Production stock score?
A score that ranks each company against the others in its industry. The four parts shown always add up to the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or old evidence affects only its own part, never as a hidden adjustment.
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 78.1% evidence confidence.
- 1Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.SSD · turning · favourable · 78% evidence70.8out of 100
How the score adds up
Growth & earnings 20.4/35 · Revenue 5.4% · PAT 10.5% · OPM change 1.7 pp · 83% evidenceCapital efficiency 19.1/25 · ROCE 18.3% · OPM 22.1% · 76% evidenceValuation 11.3/20 · P/E 18.4× · PEG 1.45 · 50% evidenceRelative strength 20.0/20 · RS sector 9.7% · RS bench 5.3% · 1Y 15.3% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 20.4 + 19.1 + 11.3 + 20 = 70.8 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. - 2West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.WFG · quiet · provisional · 55% evidence48.7out of 100
How the score adds up
Growth & earnings 19.5/35 · Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 12.1 pp · 45% evidenceCapital efficiency 3.0/25 · ROCE −8.8% · OPM −6.7% · 76% evidenceValuation 10.0/20 · P/E 3017.8× · PEG — · 0% evidenceRelative strength 16.2/20 · RS sector 4.2% · RS bench 0% · 1Y 15% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 19.5 + 3 + 10 + 16.2 = 48.7 · What this means: Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose. - 3Boise Cascade CompanyBCC · quiet · weak · 68% evidence30.7out of 100
How the score adds up
Growth & earnings 12.0/35 · Revenue 1.2% · PAT −37.8% · OPM change 1.2 pp · 83% evidenceCapital efficiency 8.7/25 · ROCE 6.5% · OPM 3.1% · 76% evidenceValuation 10.0/20 · P/E 21.5× · PEG — · 0% evidenceRelative strength 0.0/20 · RS sector −6.8% · RS bench −10.8% · 1Y −0.6% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 12 + 8.7 + 10 + 0 = 30.7 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. - 4UFP Industries, Inc.UFPI · basing · weak · 68% evidence28.8out of 100
How the score adds up
Growth & earnings 6.7/35 · Revenue −0.7% · PAT −27.6% · OPM change −2 pp · 83% evidenceCapital efficiency 10.5/25 · ROCE 8.1% · OPM 3.9% · 76% evidenceValuation 10.0/20 · P/E 19.5× · PEG — · 0% evidenceRelative strength 1.6/20 · RS sector −9.4% · RS bench −13.6% · 1Y −13.1% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 6.7 + 10.5 + 10 + 1.6 = 28.8 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.
Ranked last: too little evidence (1 company)
Under 60% of the evidence behind this score is available, so it ranks after every company above, whatever the score.
- 5FF Global Holdings LtdFFGG · provisional · 11% evidence57.2out of 100
How the score adds up
Growth & earnings 21.9/43.75 · Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — · 0% evidenceCapital efficiency 22.8/31.25 · ROCE 45.3% · OPM — · 46% evidenceValuation 12.5/25 · P/E — · PEG — · 0% evidenceRelative strength: no reading this week · its 20 points are shared across the other threeExact sum: 21.9 + 22.8 + 12.5 = 57.2 (no relative-strength reading this week; its 20 points are shared across the other three) · What this means: Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
How have Lumber & Wood Production share prices moved?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Lumber & Wood Production at +15.3%. It also leads on relative strength against the S&P 500, at +5.3%. 1 of 5 companies we track is ahead of the index on that measure (1 has no relative-strength reading yet). Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 6 November 2026.
Price and relative strength
Price · same starting point: Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts: the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
RS vs S&P 500: How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
RS vs sector: The same measure taken against Lumber & Wood Production itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
1Y
Price of the 4 strongest one-year movers, each started at 100
52 weekly closes
- Simpson Manufacturing 120
- West Fraser Timber Co. 113
- Boise Cascade Company 102
- UFP Industries, Inc. 88
- S&P 500 109
| Week ending | Simpson Manufacturing | West Fraser Timber Co. | Boise Cascade Company | UFP Industries, Inc. | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Nov 2025 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 21 Nov 2025 | 99 | 99 | 104 | 101 | 98 |
| 28 Nov 2025 | 102 | 102 | 110 | 103 | 102 |
| 5 Dec 2025 | 103 | 103 | 106 | 100 | 102 |
| 12 Dec 2025 | 103 | 100 | 111 | 102 | 102 |
| 19 Dec 2025 | 102 | 98 | 108 | 103 | 101 |
| 26 Dec 2025 | 102 | 101 | 109 | 103 | 103 |
| 2 Jan 2026 | 100 | 104 | 107 | 102 | 102 |
| 9 Jan 2026 | 109 | 110 | 120 | 114 | 103 |
| 16 Jan 2026 | 115 | 116 | 124 | 119 | 103 |
| 23 Jan 2026 | 111 | 120 | 122 | 117 | 103 |
| 30 Jan 2026 | 108 | 113 | 117 | 114 | 103 |
| 6 Feb 2026 | 118 | 122 | 132 | 126 | 103 |
| 13 Feb 2026 | 127 | 122 | 125 | 127 | 102 |
| 20 Feb 2026 | 122 | 112 | 119 | 121 | 103 |
| 27 Feb 2026 | 118 | 110 | 120 | 114 | 102 |
| 6 Mar 2026 | 113 | 108 | 109 | 104 | 100 |
| 13 Mar 2026 | 108 | 107 | 101 | 99 | 99 |
| 20 Mar 2026 | 102 | 100 | 99 | 96 | 97 |
| 27 Mar 2026 | 103 | 106 | 108 | 99 | 94 |
| 3 Apr 2026 | 101 | 108 | 106 | 100 | 98 |
| 10 Apr 2026 | 107 | 107 | 116 | 106 | 101 |
| 17 Apr 2026 | 107 | 111 | 120 | 106 | 106 |
| 24 Apr 2026 | 111 | 109 | 122 | 105 | 106 |
| 1 May 2026 | 117 | 104 | 113 | 94 | 107 |
| 8 May 2026 | 115 | 103 | 102 | 93 | 110 |
| 15 May 2026 | 109 | 98 | 96 | 88 | 110 |
| 22 May 2026 | 113 | 103 | 97 | 89 | 111 |
| 29 May 2026 | 116 | 114 | 101 | 90 | 113 |
| 5 Jun 2026 | 113 | 110 | 99 | 89 | 110 |
| 12 Jun 2026 | 118 | 115 | 103 | 93 | 110 |
| 19 Jun 2026 | 122 | 117 | 108 | 96 | 111 |
| 26 Jun 2026 | 128 | 115 | 117 | 102 | 109 |
| 3 Jul 2026 | 122 | 116 | 110 | 99 | 111 |
| 10 Jul 2026 | 115 | 112 | 110 | 94 | 112 |
| 17 Jul 2026 | 115 | 117 | 112 | 95 | 111 |
| 24 Jul 2026 | 118 | 110 | 113 | 97 | 110 |
| 31 Jul 2026 | 114 | 108 | 111 | 96 | 111 |
| 7 Aug 2026 | 121 | 120 | 125 | 104 | 115 |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 118 | 117 | 121 | 99 | 116 |
| 21 Aug 2026 | 115 | 116 | 120 | 98 | 114 |
| 28 Aug 2026 | 111 | 112 | 114 | 95 | 115 |
| 4 Sep 2026 | 110 | 114 | 115 | 93 | 115 |
| 11 Sep 2026 | 106 | 115 | 109 | 89 | 114 |
| 18 Sep 2026 | 104 | 119 | 110 | 88 | 113 |
| 25 Sep 2026 | 108 | 119 | 112 | 88 | 115 |
| 2 Oct 2026 | 106 | 110 | 109 | 85 | 115 |
| 9 Oct 2026 | 104 | 107 | 107 | 82 | 116 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 87 | 114 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 112 | 116 | 113 | 90 | 113 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 118 | 111 | 114 | 91 | 113 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 120 | 113 | 102 | 88 | 109 |
3Y
Price of the 4 strongest one-year movers, each started at 100
156 weekly closes, every 2nd shown
- Simpson Manufacturing 126
- West Fraser Timber Co. 89
- Boise Cascade Company 62
- UFP Industries, Inc. 72
- S&P 500 163
| Week ending | Simpson Manufacturing | West Fraser Timber Co. | Boise Cascade Company | UFP Industries, Inc. | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Nov 2023 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 24 Nov 2023 | 104 | 101 | 102 | 100 | 101 |
| 8 Dec 2023 | 116 | 98 | 99 | 103 | 102 |
| 22 Dec 2023 | 126 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 105 |
| 5 Jan 2024 | 117 | 112 | 114 | 107 | 104 |
| 19 Jan 2024 | 116 | 108 | 119 | 105 | 107 |
| 2 Feb 2024 | 119 | 103 | 123 | 104 | 110 |
| 16 Feb 2024 | 124 | 104 | 124 | 107 | 111 |
| 1 Mar 2024 | 133 | 107 | 122 | 105 | 114 |
| 15 Mar 2024 | 126 | 106 | 117 | 105 | 113 |
| 29 Mar 2024 | 131 | 113 | 136 | 111 | 116 |
| 12 Apr 2024 | 118 | 103 | 133 | 105 | 113 |
| 26 Apr 2024 | 111 | 103 | 124 | 103 | 113 |
| 10 May 2024 | 112 | 102 | 119 | 107 | 116 |
| 24 May 2024 | 110 | 107 | 125 | 109 | 117 |
| 7 Jun 2024 | 103 | 102 | 115 | 103 | 119 |
| 21 Jun 2024 | 109 | 102 | 109 | 105 | 121 |
| 5 Jul 2024 | 104 | 98 | 103 | 97 | 123 |
| 19 Jul 2024 | 116 | 104 | 116 | 109 | 122 |
| 2 Aug 2024 | 114 | 113 | 115 | 110 | 118 |
| 16 Aug 2024 | 113 | 111 | 113 | 108 | 123 |
| 30 Aug 2024 | 117 | 116 | 121 | 110 | 125 |
| 13 Sep 2024 | 116 | 118 | 121 | 110 | 125 |
| 27 Sep 2024 | 122 | 126 | 126 | 119 | 127 |
| 11 Oct 2024 | 122 | 132 | 127 | 124 | 129 |
| 25 Oct 2024 | 116 | 127 | 120 | 118 | 129 |
| 8 Nov 2024 | 121 | 118 | 126 | 122 | 133 |
| 22 Nov 2024 | 118 | 124 | 128 | 120 | 132 |
| 6 Dec 2024 | 118 | 123 | 130 | 120 | 135 |
| 20 Dec 2024 | 107 | 112 | 109 | 103 | 131 |
| 3 Jan 2025 | 106 | 114 | 106 | 101 | 131 |
| 17 Jan 2025 | 108 | 118 | 114 | 106 | 133 |
| 31 Jan 2025 | 107 | 113 | 112 | 105 | 134 |
| 14 Feb 2025 | 111 | 104 | 108 | 105 | 135 |
| 28 Feb 2025 | 105 | 104 | 92 | 97 | 132 |
| 14 Mar 2025 | 101 | 100 | 88 | 96 | 125 |
| 28 Mar 2025 | 100 | 99 | 87 | 96 | 123 |
| 11 Apr 2025 | 96 | 99 | 85 | 96 | 118 |
| 25 Apr 2025 | 98 | 96 | 85 | 97 | 122 |
| 9 May 2025 | 100 | 97 | 79 | 88 | 125 |
| 23 May 2025 | 98 | 96 | 77 | 87 | 129 |
| 6 Jun 2025 | 100 | 98 | 77 | 87 | 133 |
| 20 Jun 2025 | 98 | 96 | 77 | 87 | 132 |
| 4 Jul 2025 | 104 | 100 | 83 | 96 | 139 |
| 18 Jul 2025 | 102 | 97 | 75 | 91 | 139 |
| 1 Aug 2025 | 114 | 91 | 74 | 88 | 138 |
| 15 Aug 2025 | 119 | 97 | 76 | 92 | 143 |
| 29 Aug 2025 | 122 | 95 | 77 | 91 | 143 |
| 12 Sep 2025 | 120 | 99 | 76 | 89 | 146 |
| 26 Sep 2025 | 109 | 88 | 69 | 83 | 147 |
| 10 Oct 2025 | 106 | 88 | 64 | 81 | 145 |
| 24 Oct 2025 | 112 | 86 | 65 | 83 | 150 |
| 7 Nov 2025 | 109 | 77 | 63 | 83 | 149 |
| 21 Nov 2025 | 104 | 78 | 64 | 83 | 146 |
| 5 Dec 2025 | 108 | 82 | 65 | 82 | 152 |
| 19 Dec 2025 | 106 | 78 | 66 | 84 | 151 |
| 2 Jan 2026 | 105 | 82 | 66 | 83 | 152 |
| 16 Jan 2026 | 120 | 92 | 76 | 98 | 153 |
| 30 Jan 2026 | 113 | 89 | 72 | 93 | 154 |
| 13 Feb 2026 | 133 | 96 | 77 | 104 | 151 |
| 27 Feb 2026 | 123 | 87 | 74 | 93 | 152 |
| 13 Mar 2026 | 113 | 84 | 62 | 81 | 147 |
| 27 Mar 2026 | 107 | 83 | 66 | 81 | 141 |
| 10 Apr 2026 | 112 | 85 | 71 | 86 | 151 |
| 24 Apr 2026 | 116 | 86 | 75 | 86 | 158 |
| 8 May 2026 | 120 | 81 | 63 | 76 | 164 |
| 22 May 2026 | 118 | 81 | 60 | 73 | 165 |
| 5 Jun 2026 | 118 | 86 | 61 | 72 | 164 |
| 19 Jun 2026 | 128 | 92 | 66 | 78 | 166 |
| 3 Jul 2026 | 128 | 91 | 68 | 81 | 165 |
| 17 Jul 2026 | 121 | 92 | 69 | 78 | 165 |
| 31 Jul 2026 | 120 | 85 | 68 | 78 | 166 |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 124 | 93 | 74 | 81 | 172 |
| 28 Aug 2026 | 116 | 88 | 70 | 78 | 171 |
| 11 Sep 2026 | 111 | 90 | 67 | 73 | 170 |
| 25 Sep 2026 | 113 | 94 | 69 | 72 | 171 |
| 9 Oct 2026 | 109 | 84 | 65 | 67 | 173 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 118 | 91 | 69 | 74 | 169 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 126 | 89 | 62 | 72 | 163 |
5Y
Price of the 4 strongest one-year movers, each started at 100
260 weekly closes, every 4th shown
- Simpson Manufacturing 165
- West Fraser Timber Co. 78
- Boise Cascade Company 98
- UFP Industries, Inc. 90
- S&P 500 157
| Week ending | Simpson Manufacturing | West Fraser Timber Co. | Boise Cascade Company | UFP Industries, Inc. | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 Nov 2021 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 10 Dec 2021 | 109 | 102 | 93 | 102 | 100 |
| 7 Jan 2022 | 110 | 106 | 96 | 99 | 99 |
| 4 Feb 2022 | 91 | 111 | 107 | 87 | 96 |
| 4 Mar 2022 | 99 | 112 | 108 | 95 | 92 |
| 1 Apr 2022 | 93 | 92 | 98 | 88 | 97 |
| 29 Apr 2022 | 87 | 101 | 105 | 87 | 88 |
| 27 May 2022 | 92 | 105 | 115 | 88 | 89 |
| 24 Jun 2022 | 82 | 87 | 82 | 76 | 83 |
| 22 Jul 2022 | 91 | 113 | 89 | 94 | 84 |
| 19 Aug 2022 | 88 | 107 | 99 | 100 | 90 |
| 16 Sep 2022 | 69 | 93 | 82 | 82 | 82 |
| 14 Oct 2022 | 65 | 86 | 82 | 79 | 76 |
| 11 Nov 2022 | 79 | 96 | 102 | 90 | 85 |
| 9 Dec 2022 | 77 | 88 | 100 | 90 | 84 |
| 6 Jan 2023 | 81 | 87 | 95 | 92 | 83 |
| 3 Feb 2023 | 93 | 100 | 109 | 109 | 88 |
| 3 Mar 2023 | 94 | 89 | 98 | 97 | 86 |
| 31 Mar 2023 | 92 | 82 | 88 | 89 | 87 |
| 28 Apr 2023 | 106 | 84 | 95 | 88 | 89 |
| 26 May 2023 | 102 | 82 | 105 | 91 | 90 |
| 23 Jun 2023 | 111 | 94 | 111 | 101 | 92 |
| 21 Jul 2023 | 125 | 100 | 137 | 113 | 96 |
| 18 Aug 2023 | 128 | 89 | 146 | 111 | 93 |
| 15 Sep 2023 | 128 | 85 | 139 | 115 | 95 |
| 13 Oct 2023 | 113 | 77 | 131 | 110 | 92 |
| 10 Nov 2023 | 122 | 85 | 146 | 115 | 94 |
| 8 Dec 2023 | 153 | 87 | 156 | 128 | 98 |
| 5 Jan 2024 | 154 | 99 | 178 | 132 | 100 |
| 2 Feb 2024 | 157 | 91 | 193 | 129 | 105 |
| 1 Mar 2024 | 176 | 94 | 192 | 130 | 109 |
| 29 Mar 2024 | 172 | 100 | 213 | 138 | 112 |
| 26 Apr 2024 | 146 | 91 | 194 | 127 | 108 |
| 24 May 2024 | 145 | 94 | 196 | 135 | 113 |
| 21 Jun 2024 | 144 | 90 | 170 | 130 | 116 |
| 19 Jul 2024 | 152 | 91 | 182 | 135 | 117 |
| 16 Aug 2024 | 149 | 98 | 177 | 133 | 118 |
| 13 Sep 2024 | 152 | 104 | 189 | 137 | 120 |
| 11 Oct 2024 | 161 | 117 | 198 | 153 | 124 |
| 8 Nov 2024 | 159 | 104 | 198 | 151 | 128 |
| 6 Dec 2024 | 155 | 108 | 203 | 149 | 130 |
| 3 Jan 2025 | 140 | 101 | 165 | 125 | 126 |
| 31 Jan 2025 | 141 | 100 | 175 | 130 | 128 |
| 28 Feb 2025 | 138 | 92 | 144 | 120 | 127 |
| 28 Mar 2025 | 132 | 87 | 137 | 119 | 119 |
| 25 Apr 2025 | 129 | 85 | 133 | 120 | 117 |
| 23 May 2025 | 130 | 85 | 120 | 108 | 124 |
| 20 Jun 2025 | 129 | 84 | 120 | 108 | 127 |
| 18 Jul 2025 | 134 | 85 | 117 | 113 | 134 |
| 15 Aug 2025 | 157 | 86 | 120 | 114 | 137 |
| 12 Sep 2025 | 158 | 87 | 119 | 111 | 140 |
| 10 Oct 2025 | 139 | 78 | 101 | 100 | 139 |
| 7 Nov 2025 | 143 | 68 | 98 | 103 | 143 |
| 5 Dec 2025 | 142 | 72 | 102 | 102 | 146 |
| 2 Jan 2026 | 138 | 73 | 103 | 103 | 146 |
| 30 Jan 2026 | 148 | 79 | 112 | 116 | 148 |
| 27 Feb 2026 | 162 | 77 | 115 | 115 | 146 |
| 27 Mar 2026 | 141 | 74 | 104 | 101 | 135 |
| 24 Apr 2026 | 152 | 76 | 117 | 106 | 152 |
| 22 May 2026 | 155 | 72 | 93 | 90 | 159 |
| 19 Jun 2026 | 168 | 81 | 104 | 97 | 159 |
| 17 Jul 2026 | 159 | 81 | 107 | 96 | 159 |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 163 | 82 | 116 | 101 | 166 |
| 11 Sep 2026 | 146 | 80 | 105 | 90 | 163 |
| 9 Oct 2026 | 144 | 74 | 102 | 83 | 166 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 165 | 78 | 98 | 90 | 157 |
The companies with the strongest one-year price moves are drawn. The S&P 500 line is dashed.
Biggest one-year moves
- 1Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.SSD · $8.1B+15.3%1 year
- 2West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.WFG · $5.3B+15.0%1 year
- 3Boise Cascade CompanyBCC · $2.4B−0.6%1 year
- 4UFP Industries, Inc.UFPI · $4.4B−13.1%1 year
Strongest against S&P 500
- 1Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.SSD · $8.1B+5.3%vs S&P 500
- 2West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.WFG · $5.3B0.0%vs S&P 500
- 3Boise Cascade CompanyBCC · $2.4B−10.8%vs S&P 500
- 4UFP Industries, Inc.UFPI · $4.4B−13.6%vs S&P 500
Strongest against the sector itself
- 1Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.SSD · $8.1B+9.7%vs sector
- 2West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.WFG · $5.3B+4.2%vs sector
- 3Boise Cascade CompanyBCC · $2.4B−6.8%vs sector
- 4UFP Industries, Inc.UFPI · $4.4B−9.4%vs sector
Which Lumber & Wood Production companies have the most revenue, and which grow fastest?
Boise Cascade Company has the highest Revenue among the 5 Lumber & Wood Production companies compared here, at $6,592 million. UFP Industries, Inc. is next at $6,407 million. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at 5.4%, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.
What the numbers say: Boise Cascade Company is the largest at $6,592 million, 2.9% ahead of UFP Industries, Inc. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s growth is 5.4% from a $2,436 million base, with 19 reported quarters out of the last 20. Fast growth from a smaller base is not yet the same as proven size.
What this means: Boise Cascade Company is the size to compare against; Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. is the one growing fastest. The faster grower has to keep that growth and turn it into margin and returns before it counts as more than a fast start.
This conclusion weakens if: Boise Cascade Company's growth falls below Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenue · company comparison
Revenue, by reported quarter
- Boise Cascade Company $1.8B
- UFP Industries, Inc. $1.7B
- Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. $638M
| Quarter | Boise Cascade Company | UFP Industries, Inc. | Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2022 | $2.3B | $2.5B | $494M |
| Jun 2022 | $2.3B | $2.9B | $593M |
| Sep 2022 | $2.2B | $2.3B | $554M |
| Dec 2022 | $1.6B | $1.9B | $476M |
| Mar 2023 | $1.5B | — | $534M |
| Jun 2023 | $1.8B | $1.8B | $598M |
| Sep 2023 | $1.8B | $2.0B | $580M |
| Dec 2023 | $1.6B | $1.5B | $502M |
| Mar 2024 | $1.6B | $1.6B | $531M |
| Jun 2024 | $1.8B | $1.9B | $597M |
| Sep 2024 | $1.7B | $1.6B | $587M |
| Dec 2024 | $1.6B | $1.5B | $517M |
| Mar 2025 | $1.5B | $1.6B | $539M |
| Jun 2025 | $1.7B | $1.8B | $631M |
| Sep 2025 | $1.7B | $1.6B | $624M |
| Dec 2025 | $1.5B | $1.3B | $539M |
| Mar 2026 | $1.5B | $1.5B | $588M |
| Jun 2026 | $1.8B | $1.9B | $671M |
| Sep 2026 | $1.8B | $1.7B | $638M |
| Dec 2026 | — | — | — |
Revenue growth, by reported quarter
- Boise Cascade Company 8.0%
- UFP Industries, Inc. 11%
- Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. 2.2%
| Quarter | Boise Cascade Company | UFP Industries, Inc. | Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2022 | — | — | — |
| Jun 2022 | −6.8% | 7.4% | 45% |
| Sep 2022 | 15% | 11% | 40% |
| Dec 2022 | −8.6% | −5.1% | 14% |
| Mar 2023 | −34% | — | 8.1% |
| Jun 2023 | −20% | −37% | 0.8% |
| Sep 2023 | −15% | −12% | 4.7% |
| Dec 2023 | 1.0% | −20% | 5.5% |
| Mar 2024 | 6.5% | — | −0.6% |
| Jun 2024 | −0.9% | 4.4% | −0.2% |
| Sep 2024 | −6.5% | −19% | 1.2% |
| Dec 2024 | −4.7% | −4.1% | 3.0% |
| Mar 2025 | −6.6% | −2.6% | 1.5% |
| Jun 2025 | −3.2% | −3.5% | 5.7% |
| Sep 2025 | −2.7% | −5.4% | 6.3% |
| Dec 2025 | −6.8% | −9.0% | 4.3% |
| Mar 2026 | −2.4% | −8.5% | 9.1% |
| Jun 2026 | 5.2% | 2.6% | 6.3% |
| Sep 2026 | 8.0% | 11% | 2.2% |
| Dec 2026 | — | — | — |
3 of 5 companies report revenue, 3 of 5 revenue growth. On every company-comparison chart on this page the five leaders are drawn, level and change on separate charts, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
Revenue · largest
- 1Boise Cascade CompanyBCC$6.6B
- 2UFP Industries, Inc.UFPI$6.4B
- 3Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.SSD$2.4B
Revenue growth · fastest growers
- 1Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.SSD5.4%
- 2Boise Cascade CompanyBCC1.2%
- 3UFP Industries, Inc.UFPI−0.7%
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boise Cascade Company BCC | $1.8B | 8.0% | Sep 2026 |
| UFP Industries, Inc. UFPI | $1.7B | 11% | Sep 2026 |
| West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. WFG | $1.4B | 17% | Dec 2026 |
| Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. SSD | $638M | 2.2% | Sep 2026 |
Revenue shows both size and speed. A large company can absorb shocks and pay for wide distribution; faster growth can mean market-share gains, new capacity or stronger demand. The best sign is usually growth that lasts without hurting margins and returns.
What to watch
Watch the next two reported quarters for growth persistence, margin conversion and whether the leader is gaining share without stretching working capital.
Which Lumber & Wood Production companies keep the most from each $100 of sales?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has the highest OPM among the 5 Lumber & Wood Production companies compared here, at 22.1%. UFP Industries, Inc. is next at 3.9%. West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. has the highest Margin change at +12.1 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its OPM series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. leads opm at 22.1%; West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. leads margin change at +12.1 percentage points.
What this means: Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Operating margin · company comparison
OPM, by reported quarter
- Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. 22%
- UFP Industries, Inc. 3.9%
- Boise Cascade Company 3.1%
- West Fraser Timber Co. −6.7%
| Quarter | Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | UFP Industries, Inc. | Boise Cascade Company | West Fraser Timber Co. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2022 | 26% | 10% | 17% | 46% |
| Jun 2022 | 23% | 9.8% | 13% | 34% |
| Sep 2022 | 23% | 10% | 14% | 13% |
| Dec 2022 | 20% | 8.8% | 9.6% | −5.3% |
| Mar 2023 | 22% | — | 8.3% | −5.0% |
| Jun 2023 | 25% | 8.9% | 11% | −3.9% |
| Sep 2023 | 24% | 9.5% | 10% | 12% |
| Dec 2023 | 14% | 8.1% | 8.1% | −3.5% |
| Mar 2024 | 19% | 8.2% | 8.1% | 3.5% |
| Jun 2024 | 22% | 8.5% | 8.2% | 8.0% |
| Sep 2024 | 22% | 7.2% | 6.8% | −6.2% |
| Dec 2024 | 15% | 5.8% | 5.9% | 0.1% |
| Mar 2025 | 19% | 5.8% | 3.5% | 4.3% |
| Jun 2025 | 22% | 6.9% | 4.6% | −2.9% |
| Sep 2025 | 20% | 5.9% | 1.9% | −21% |
| Dec 2025 | 14% | 4.1% | 0.8% | −19% |
| Mar 2026 | 20% | 4.3% | 1.9% | — |
| Jun 2026 | 24% | 5.5% | 4.6% | −16% |
| Sep 2026 | 22% | 3.9% | 3.1% | −5.6% |
| Dec 2026 | — | — | — | −6.7% |
Margin change, by reported quarter
- Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. +1.7 pp
- UFP Industries, Inc. −2.0 pp
- Boise Cascade Company +1.2 pp
- West Fraser Timber Co. +12.1 pp
| Quarter | Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | UFP Industries, Inc. | Boise Cascade Company | West Fraser Timber Co. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2022 | — | — | — | — |
| Jun 2022 | −1.4 pp | +1.0 pp | −3.8 pp | −18.7 pp |
| Sep 2022 | −2.9 pp | +2.2 pp | +7.0 pp | −13.2 pp |
| Dec 2022 | −3.1 pp | −0.9 pp | −3.2 pp | −22.8 pp |
| Mar 2023 | −4.0 pp | — | −9.0 pp | −51.3 pp |
| Jun 2023 | +1.2 pp | −0.9 pp | −2.5 pp | −37.8 pp |
| Sep 2023 | +1.8 pp | −0.7 pp | −3.8 pp | −1.8 pp |
| Dec 2023 | −5.6 pp | −0.7 pp | −1.5 pp | +1.8 pp |
| Mar 2024 | −3.9 pp | — | −0.2 pp | +8.5 pp |
| Jun 2024 | −2.2 pp | −0.4 pp | −2.3 pp | +11.9 pp |
| Sep 2024 | −2.8 pp | −2.3 pp | −3.3 pp | −17.8 pp |
| Dec 2024 | +0.6 pp | −2.3 pp | −2.2 pp | +3.6 pp |
| Mar 2025 | +0.5 pp | −2.4 pp | −4.6 pp | +0.8 pp |
| Jun 2025 | −0.2 pp | −1.6 pp | −3.6 pp | −10.9 pp |
| Sep 2025 | −1.1 pp | −1.3 pp | −4.9 pp | −14.9 pp |
| Dec 2025 | −1.4 pp | −1.7 pp | −5.1 pp | −18.9 pp |
| Mar 2026 | +0.6 pp | −1.5 pp | −1.6 pp | — |
| Jun 2026 | +2.2 pp | −1.4 pp | 0.0 pp | −12.9 pp |
| Sep 2026 | +1.7 pp | −2.0 pp | +1.2 pp | +15.5 pp |
| Dec 2026 | — | — | — | +12.1 pp |
4 of 5 companies report OPM, 4 of 5 margin change.
OPM · highest
- 1Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.SSD22%
- 2UFP Industries, Inc.UFPI3.9%
- 3Boise Cascade CompanyBCC3.1%
- 4West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.WFG−6.7%
Margin change · fastest expanders
- 1West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.WFG+12.1 pp
- 2Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.SSD+1.7 pp
- 3Boise Cascade CompanyBCC+1.2 pp
- 4UFP Industries, Inc.UFPI−2.0 pp
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. SSD | 22% | +1.7 pp | Sep 2026 |
| UFP Industries, Inc. UFPI | 3.9% | −2.0 pp | Sep 2026 |
| Boise Cascade Company BCC | 3.1% | +1.2 pp | Sep 2026 |
| West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. WFG | −6.7% | +12.1 pp | Dec 2026 |
What to watch
Watch whether the next two comparable periods confirm the current margin change rather than reversing it.
Which Lumber & Wood Production companies earn the most profit?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 5 Lumber & Wood Production companies compared here, at $380 million. UFP Industries, Inc. is next at $225 million. The same company also has the highest Profit growth, at 10.5%. 3 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.
What the numbers say: Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. earns the most, $380 million of profit over the last 12 months, 68.9% above UFP Industries, Inc. A fast rate from a small base matters less than a large profit that keeps coming.
What this means: Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profit · company comparison
Net profit, by reported quarter
- Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. $109M
- UFP Industries, Inc. $58M
- Boise Cascade Company $36M
| Quarter | Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | UFP Industries, Inc. | Boise Cascade Company |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2022 | $95M | $183M | $303M |
| Jun 2022 | $94M | $195M | $218M |
| Sep 2022 | $88M | $160M | $220M |
| Dec 2022 | $58M | $127M | $117M |
| Mar 2023 | $88M | — | $97M |
| Jun 2023 | $107M | $120M | $146M |
| Sep 2023 | $104M | $143M | $143M |
| Dec 2023 | $55M | $98M | $98M |
| Mar 2024 | $75M | $116M | $104M |
| Jun 2024 | $98M | $121M | $112M |
| Sep 2024 | $94M | $96M | $91M |
| Dec 2024 | $55M | $65M | $69M |
| Mar 2025 | $78M | $76M | $40M |
| Jun 2025 | $104M | $97M | $62M |
| Sep 2025 | $107M | $73M | $22M |
| Dec 2025 | $56M | $38M | $9M |
| Mar 2026 | $88M | $49M | $18M |
| Jun 2026 | $127M | $80M | $57M |
| Sep 2026 | $109M | $58M | $36M |
| Dec 2026 | — | — | — |
Profit growth, by reported quarter
- Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. 1.9%
- UFP Industries, Inc. −21%
- Boise Cascade Company 64%
| Quarter | Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | UFP Industries, Inc. | Boise Cascade Company |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2022 | — | — | — |
| Jun 2022 | 31% | 11% | −28% |
| Sep 2022 | 19% | 37% | 139% |
| Dec 2022 | −17% | −4.5% | −31% |
| Mar 2023 | −7.4% | — | −68% |
| Jun 2023 | 14% | −38% | −33% |
| Sep 2023 | 18% | −11% | −35% |
| Dec 2023 | −5.2% | −23% | −16% |
| Mar 2024 | −15% | — | 7.2% |
| Jun 2024 | −8.4% | 0.8% | −23% |
| Sep 2024 | −9.6% | −33% | −36% |
| Dec 2024 | 0.0% | −34% | −30% |
| Mar 2025 | 4.0% | −34% | −62% |
| Jun 2025 | 6.1% | −20% | −45% |
| Sep 2025 | 14% | −24% | −76% |
| Dec 2025 | 1.8% | −42% | −87% |
| Mar 2026 | 13% | −36% | −55% |
| Jun 2026 | 22% | −18% | −8.1% |
| Sep 2026 | 1.9% | −21% | 64% |
| Dec 2026 | — | — | — |
3 of 5 companies report net profit, 3 of 5 profit growth. The profit growth chart is drawn inside its usual range; a quarter far outside it (often a first quarter after listing or a near-zero base) is marked with an arrow at the edge, with its exact value in the hover card and the table.
Net profit · largest
- 1Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.SSD$380M
- 2UFP Industries, Inc.UFPI$225M
- 3Boise Cascade CompanyBCC$120M
Profit growth · fastest growers
- 1Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.SSD11%
- 2UFP Industries, Inc.UFPI−28%
- 3Boise Cascade CompanyBCC−38%
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. SSD | $109M | 1.9% | Sep 2026 |
| UFP Industries, Inc. UFPI | $58M | −21% | Sep 2026 |
| Boise Cascade Company BCC | $36M | 64% | Sep 2026 |
| West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. WFG | −$80M | −123% | Dec 2026 |
What to watch
Watch whether the next two comparable periods confirm the current profit growth rather than reversing it.
Which Lumber & Wood Production companies earn the best return on capital?
FF Global Holdings Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 5 Lumber & Wood Production companies compared here, at 45.3%. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. is next at 18.3%. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +1.4 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: FF Global Holdings Ltd leads ROCE at 45.3%, 27 percentage points above Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. A high return reported once may be one good year; a high return reported year after year shows a lasting business.
What this means: FF Global Holdings Ltd sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
Return on capital · company comparison
ROCE, by reported quarter
- Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. 18%
- UFP Industries, Inc. 8.1%
- Boise Cascade Company 6.5%
- West Fraser Timber Co. −8.8%
| Quarter | Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | UFP Industries, Inc. | Boise Cascade Company | West Fraser Timber Co. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2022 | 22% | 31% | 53% | 44% |
| Jun 2022 | 22% | 33% | 45% | 37% |
| Sep 2022 | 23% | 33% | 47% | 33% |
| Dec 2022 | 23% | 31% | 43% | 29% |
| Mar 2023 | 22% | — | 32% | 12% |
| Jun 2023 | 21% | 27% | 28% | 0.6% |
| Sep 2023 | 21% | 23% | 22% | −0.3% |
| Dec 2023 | 21% | 19% | 22% | 0.0% |
| Mar 2024 | 19% | 17% | 22% | 1.7% |
| Jun 2024 | 18% | 17% | 20% | 4.1% |
| Sep 2024 | 17% | 15% | 19% | 0.6% |
| Dec 2024 | 18% | 14% | 18% | 1.4% |
| Mar 2025 | 18% | 13% | 15% | 1.4% |
| Jun 2025 | 17% | 12% | 12% | −0.9% |
| Sep 2025 | 17% | 11% | 9.3% | −3.3% |
| Dec 2025 | 16% | 10% | 6.5% | −6.8% |
| Mar 2026 | 17% | 9.5% | 5.6% | — |
| Jun 2026 | 18% | 8.8% | 5.7% | −11% |
| Sep 2026 | 18% | 8.1% | 6.5% | −12% |
| Dec 2026 | — | — | — | −8.8% |
ROCE change, by reported quarter
- Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. +1.4 pp
- UFP Industries, Inc. −2.9 pp
- Boise Cascade Company −2.8 pp
- West Fraser Timber Co. −2.0 pp
| Quarter | Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | UFP Industries, Inc. | Boise Cascade Company | West Fraser Timber Co. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2022 | — | — | — | — |
| Jun 2022 | — | — | — | — |
| Sep 2022 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 2022 | — | — | — | — |
| Mar 2023 | −0.3 pp | — | −20.8 pp | −32.2 pp |
| Jun 2023 | −1.1 pp | −5.7 pp | −17.2 pp | −36.0 pp |
| Sep 2023 | −1.7 pp | −10.2 pp | −24.6 pp | −33.4 pp |
| Dec 2023 | −2.2 pp | −12.3 pp | −20.7 pp | −28.5 pp |
| Mar 2024 | −2.2 pp | — | −9.8 pp | −10.2 pp |
| Jun 2024 | −2.5 pp | −10.4 pp | −7.4 pp | +3.5 pp |
| Sep 2024 | −3.9 pp | −8.2 pp | −3.5 pp | +0.9 pp |
| Dec 2024 | −2.1 pp | −5.0 pp | −4.7 pp | +1.4 pp |
| Mar 2025 | −1.3 pp | −4.9 pp | −7.1 pp | −0.3 pp |
| Jun 2025 | −1.2 pp | −4.7 pp | −7.8 pp | −5.0 pp |
| Sep 2025 | −0.2 pp | −3.9 pp | −9.6 pp | −3.9 pp |
| Dec 2025 | −2.0 pp | −3.4 pp | −11.0 pp | −8.2 pp |
| Mar 2026 | −0.8 pp | −3.0 pp | −9.2 pp | — |
| Jun 2026 | +0.6 pp | −3.0 pp | −6.6 pp | −10.1 pp |
| Sep 2026 | +1.4 pp | −2.9 pp | −2.8 pp | −8.3 pp |
| Dec 2026 | — | — | — | −2.0 pp |
5 of 5 companies report ROCE, 5 of 5 ROCE change.
ROCE · highest
- 1FF Global Holdings LtdFFGG45%
- 2Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.SSD18%
- 3UFP Industries, Inc.UFPI8.1%
- 4Boise Cascade CompanyBCC6.5%
- 5West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.WFG−8.8%
ROCE change · fastest improvers
- 1Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.SSD+1.4 pp
- 2West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.WFG−2.0 pp
- 3Boise Cascade CompanyBCC−2.8 pp
- 4UFP Industries, Inc.UFPI−2.9 pp
- 5FF Global Holdings LtdFFGG−6.7 pp
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. SSD | 18% | +1.4 pp | Sep 2026 |
| UFP Industries, Inc. UFPI | 8.1% | −2.9 pp | Sep 2026 |
| Boise Cascade Company BCC | 6.5% | −2.8 pp | Sep 2026 |
| West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. WFG | −8.8% | −2.0 pp | Dec 2026 |
What to watch
Watch whether the next two comparable periods confirm the current roce change rather than reversing it.
How are Lumber & Wood Production stocks valued against growth and quality?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 5 Lumber & Wood Production companies compared here, at 1.45×. The same company also has the lowest P/E, at 18.4×. 1 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026. Its PEG series carries 7 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: That would need today's multiple, the company's own history and steady growth to agree.
What this means: A low valuation is a reason to look closer at the business, not a conclusion on its own.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is worked out the same way every time, as the P/E on the last 12 months of reported earnings divided by that growth rate, never on expected earnings. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
Valuation · company comparison
PEG, by reported quarter
| Quarter | Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. |
|---|---|
| Mar 2022 | — |
| Jun 2022 | — |
| Sep 2022 | — |
| Dec 2022 | — |
| Mar 2023 | 2.2 |
| Jun 2023 | — |
| Sep 2023 | — |
| Dec 2023 | 3.6 |
| Mar 2024 | — |
| Jun 2024 | — |
| Sep 2024 | — |
| Dec 2024 | — |
| Mar 2025 | — |
| Jun 2025 | — |
| Sep 2025 | 2.4 |
| Dec 2025 | 2.3 |
| Mar 2026 | 1.8 |
| Jun 2026 | 1.4 |
| Sep 2026 | 1.5 |
| Dec 2026 | — |
P/E, by reported quarter
| Quarter | Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. |
|---|---|
| Mar 2022 | 15.2× |
| Jun 2022 | 13.1× |
| Sep 2022 | 9.8× |
| Dec 2022 | 11.3× |
| Mar 2023 | 14.3× |
| Jun 2023 | 17.3× |
| Sep 2023 | 17.9× |
| Dec 2023 | 23.9× |
| Mar 2024 | 25.5× |
| Jun 2024 | 21.4× |
| Sep 2024 | 25.1× |
| Dec 2024 | 21.7× |
| Mar 2025 | 20.3× |
| Jun 2025 | 19.7× |
| Sep 2025 | 20.2× |
| Dec 2025 | 19.4× |
| Mar 2026 | 19.9× |
| Jun 2026 | 22.7× |
| Sep 2026 | 18.4× |
| Dec 2026 | — |
1 of 5 companies report PEG, 4 of 5 P/E.
PEG · lowest PEG
P/E · lowest P/E
- 1Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.SSD18.4×
- 2UFP Industries, Inc.UFPI19.5×
- 3Boise Cascade CompanyBCC21.5×
- 4West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.WFG3,017.8×
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. SSD | 1.5 | 18.4× | Sep 2026 |
| West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. WFG | — | 3,017.8× | Dec 2026 |
| UFP Industries, Inc. UFPI | — | 19.5× | Sep 2026 |
| Boise Cascade Company BCC | — | 21.5× | Sep 2026 |
What to watch
Watch whether the next two comparable periods confirm the current p/e rather than reversing it.
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Lumber & Wood Production comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 5 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still come from a very small starting figure.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can come from a very small starting figure. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary, or look high because the capital base is small. It is best read beside margin, cash flow and how much is spent back on the business.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks published data only. Management quality, upcoming events and risks are not part of it.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 5 Lumber & Wood Production companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Dec 2026 and market data through 6 November 2026.
What else do people ask about Lumber & Wood Production stocks?
These 21 answers restate the Lumber & Wood Production comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 5 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Dec 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 6 November 2026. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Lumber & Wood Production sector outperforming S&P 500?
Lumber & Wood Production has done worse than the S&P 500 by 4.1% over 52 weeks and by 5.5% over 13 weeks.
1 of 5 companies we track is beating the S&P 500 on relative strength (how a share price has done against the index over recent months) (1 has no relative-strength reading yet), and 2 of the 4 with a long enough price history are ahead of the industry itself.
Which Lumber & Wood Production company is largest by revenue?
Boise Cascade Company leads with revenue of $6,592 million, based on 3 of 5 comparable companies through Sep 2026.
Which Lumber & Wood Production company is growing fastest?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 5.4%, across 3 of 5 comparable companies.
Which Lumber & Wood Production company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. ranks first at 70.8 out of 100, with 78.1% of the evidence available. The score ranks published data; it is not a recommendation.
Which Lumber & Wood Production company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 1.45, among 1 of 5 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Lumber & Wood Production comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Dec 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four parts add up directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or old evidence moves only that part toward the middle.
Which Lumber & Wood Production company is the biggest?
Boise Cascade Company is the largest, with revenue of $6,592 million over the last 12 months, ahead of UFP Industries, Inc. at $6,407 million. That covers 3 of 5 companies with comparable reporting through Sep 2026.
Which Lumber & Wood Production company has the best profit margins?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has the highest operating margin at 22.1%, from 4 of 5 comparable companies. West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +12.1 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is steady or rising, not when it is at a peak.
Which Lumber & Wood Production company makes the most profit?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. earns the most, at $380 million of net profit over the last 12 months, from 3 of 5 comparable companies. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has the fastest profit growth at 10.5%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Lumber & Wood Production company earns the highest return on capital?
FF Global Holdings Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 45.3%, across 5 of 5 companies. A high return that repeats for years shows a lasting business, while a single high reading can come from a small capital base or one good year.
Which Lumber & Wood Production stock has the lowest PEG ratio?
On PEG (where a lower number means a lower price for what the company earns), Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has the lowest at 1.45×.
Only 1 of 5 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a ranking of the whole industry. A low multiple is a reason to look closer at the business, not a conclusion on its own.
Is the Lumber & Wood Production sector beating the market?
Lumber & Wood Production has done worse than the S&P 500 by 4.1% over the last 52 weeks and by 5.5% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members.
Inside the sector, 1 of the 5 companies we track is beating the market on their own (1 has no relative-strength reading yet). Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Lumber & Wood Production stock has the strongest price momentum?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has the strongest relative strength against the S&P 500, meaning its share price has done best against the index. A price can move well before the business results back it up, and sometimes without them.
Which Lumber & Wood Production company has the highest 4-Factor score?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. scores 70.8 out of 100, with 78.1% of the evidence available, from 20.4 points on growth and earnings, 19.1 on capital efficiency, 11.3 on valuation and 20 on relative strength.
It ranks published data only; management quality, upcoming events and risks are not part of the score.
How many Lumber & Wood Production companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
This comparison covers 5 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Dec 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list, nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Lumber & Wood Production sector?
The 5 Lumber & Wood Production companies on this page carry $20,301 million of combined market value. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. is the largest at $8,069 million, about 40% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 6 November 2026.
How is the Lumber & Wood Production sector performing?
1 of the 5 Lumber & Wood Production companies we track is doing better than the S&P 500 on relative strength (how a share price has done against the index over recent months) (1 has no relative-strength reading yet).
The sector itself is 4.1% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members.
How many Lumber & Wood Production stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 5 listed Lumber & Wood Production companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Dec 2026. Membership is the full industry list, nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing figures are never estimated, copied forward or swapped for a similar-looking line, and a company with missing evidence has its score pulled toward the middle rather than scored as bad.
Is this advice?
No, every figure here is worked out by code from company filings and market data, for research. It does not account for your situation and is not a substitute for advice from a registered adviser.
More lists
Every Sector Alpha list, grouped
Stock screens
Market lists
Themes
Sectors
US stocks
Every US industry against its index · What changed this week · Plain-text data
Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers · Fundamentals through Dec 2026 · Prices through 6 November 2026. Every ranking is worked out by code from reported figures. Missing values stay missing.
X · Instagram · YouTube · About · Newsletter · Newsletter archive
This is research, not advice. We’re not SEBI-registered.