Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-04
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Copper Stocks

Copper: Ero Copper Corp. owns the largest revenue base AND the fastest current growth.

01 · the industry itself · before any single company

How has Copper moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 83% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 48% on average over the last four reported quarters.

BASING · +0 joinedPrice and the fundamentals both up0 of 6 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS — · 5/6 >200d (+2) · 0/6 lead (+0) · EPS 6/6↑

20050020262025202420232022 651348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100Mar 22Sep 22Mar 23Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 80, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 69, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 58, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 43, against 100 at the start · down 57.3% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 39, against 100 at the start · down 53.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 54, against 100 at the start · down 43.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 57, against 100 at the start · down 20.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 52, against 100 at the start · down 11.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 59, against 100 at the start · down 0.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 59, against 100 at the start · up 13.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 19, against 100 at the start · up 0.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 21, against 100 at the start · up 7.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 48, against 100 at the start · up 15.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 48, against 100 at the start · up 23.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 75, against 100 at the start · up 25.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 86, against 100 at the start · up 127.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two86 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
20050020262025202420232022 651348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100Mar 22Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 80, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 69, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 58, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 43, against 100 at the start · down 57.3% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 39, against 100 at the start · down 53.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 54, against 100 at the start · down 43.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 57, against 100 at the start · down 20.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 52, against 100 at the start · down 11.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 59, against 100 at the start · down 0.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 59, against 100 at the start · up 13.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 19, against 100 at the start · up 0.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 21, against 100 at the start · up 7.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 48, against 100 at the start · up 15.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 48, against 100 at the start · up 23.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 75, against 100 at the start · up 25.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 86, against 100 at the start · up 127.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two86No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Copper, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 6 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Copper outperforming S&P 500?

Copper has outperformed S&P 500 by 63.2% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 4.8%. 5 of 6 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is broad. Trekor Metals Limited is the strongest against the sector itself at +12.7%.

-4.8%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+63.2%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
5/6Stocks leading S&P 500
4/6Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: current leadership is concentrated, so durability matters more than rank.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Copper has outperformed S&P 500 by 63.2% over 52 weeks and 4.8% over 13 weeks. 5 of 6 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 6 beat the sector itself. Ero Copper Corp. leads with revenue of $924 million, based on 3 of 6 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Companies
6
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$278.1B
Southern Copper Corporation
Revenue growing
2/3
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
5/6
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 3 of 6
03 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Southern Copper Corporation has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 57.8% evidence confidence.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Southern Copper CorporationSCCO 67.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 21.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 9.1 pp 45% evidence 19.2/25 ROCE 13% · OPM 58.3% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 25.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.2/20 RS sector 6% · RS bench 11.8% · 1Y 102.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.5 + 19.2 + 9.7 + 17.2 = 67.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
2Ero Copper Corp.ERO 61.4/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 23.8/35 Revenue 88.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0.6 pp 83% evidence 13.9/25 ROCE 5.6% · OPM 35% 76% evidence 15.9/20 P/E 9.5× · PEG 0.18 65% evidence 7.8/20 RS sector -2.2% · RS bench 3.2% · 1Y 107.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.8 + 13.9 + 15.9 + 7.8 = 61.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Freeport-McMoRan Inc.FCX 55.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 17.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 11.6 pp 45% evidence 12.9/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 34.3% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 31× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.1/20 RS sector 4.3% · RS bench 11.3% · 1Y 60.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.7 + 12.9 + 9.1 + 16.1 = 55.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4Trekor Metals LimitedTGB 53.4/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 21.1/35 Revenue 28.3% · PAT — · OPM change 10.2 pp 62% evidence 8.0/25 ROCE 3.7% · OPM 33.1% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 179.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.8/20 RS sector 12.7% · RS bench 17.8% · 1Y 147%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.1 + 8 + 8.5 + 15.8 = 53.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Hudbay Minerals Inc.HBM 43.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 16.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 9.1 pp 45% evidence 9.1/25 ROCE 3.6% · OPM 40.3% 76% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 13.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.1/20 RS sector 3.7% · RS bench 9.1% · 1Y 157%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16 + 9.1 + 10.3 + 8.1 = 43.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Ivanhoe Electric Inc.IE 39.4/100Thin evidence · provisional54% evidence BASING 20.0/35 Revenue 0% · PAT — · OPM change 414.4 pp 62% evidence 4.9/25 ROCE -21% · OPM — 61% evidence 11.5/20 P/E -55.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -31.9% · RS bench -27.1% · 1Y 3.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20 + 4.9 + 11.5 + 3 = 39.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
04 · what price has already done

Market action

Hudbay Minerals Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Copper at +157%. Trekor Metals Limited leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +17.8%. 5 of 6 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Ero Copper Corp. has the highest Revenue among the 6 Copper companies compared here, at $924 million. Trekor Metals Limited is next at $771 million. The same company also holds the highest Revenue growth, at 88.6%. 3 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026. Its Revenue series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Ero Copper Corp. is the scale leader at $924 million, 19.8% ahead of Trekor Metals Limited. Ero Copper Corp.'s growth is 88.6% from a $924 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderEro Copper Corp. · $924 million
Gap19.8% versus #2 · Trekor Metals Limited
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/6 companies · 114 observations

Investor read: Ero Copper Corp. is the scale benchmark; Ero Copper Corp. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Ero Copper Corp.'s growth falls below Ero Copper Corp.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
Revenue growthfastest growers
Revenue · company comparison
3/6 level · 3/6 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX$6.2B8.8%Jun 2026
Southern Copper Corporation SCCO$4.3B36%Jun 2026
Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM$757M27%Jun 2026
Ero Copper Corp. ERO$263M110%Mar 2026
Trekor Metals Limited TGB$237M71%Mar 2026
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE$1M0.0%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

$112M
$135M
$109M
$115M
$86M
$117M
$101M
$105M
$105M
$116M
$106M
$117M
$125M
$123M
$125M
$164M
$177M
$320M
$263M

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

$6.1B
$6.2B
$6.6B
$5.4B
$5.0B
$5.8B
$5.4B
$5.7B
$5.8B
$5.9B
$6.3B
$6.6B
$6.8B
$5.7B
$5.7B
$7.6B
$7.0B
$5.6B
$6.2B

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

$359M
$425M
$379M
$415M
$346M
$321M
$295M
$312M
$480M
$602M
$525M
$426M
$486M
$585M
$595M
$536M
$347M
$733M
$757M

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

$1M
$1M
$7M
$0M
$1M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$0M
$2M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

$2.7B
$2.8B
$2.8B
$2.3B
$2.2B
$2.8B
$2.8B
$2.3B
$2.5B
$2.3B
$2.6B
$3.1B
$2.9B
$2.8B
$3.1B
$3.1B
$3.4B
$3.9B
$4.3B

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

$133M
$103M
$118M
$83M
$90M
$101M
$116M
$112M
$144M
$154M
$147M
$138M
$156M
$168M
$139M
$116M
$174M
$244M
$237M

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

-5.0%
-23%
-13%
-7.3%
-8.7%
22%
-0.9%
5.0%
11%
19%
6.0%
18%
40%
42%
160%
110%

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

-5.8%
-18%
-6.6%
-18%
5.9%
16%
2.6%
17%
15%
17%
-3.1%
-9.4%
14%
2.7%
-1.5%
8.8%

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

2.7%
-3.6%
-24%
-22%
-25%
39%
88%
78%
37%
1.3%
-2.8%
13%
26%
-29%
25%
27%

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

-100%
0.0%
-100%
-86%
-100%
-100%
0.0%
-50%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

-20%
-20%
-0.1%
1.1%
-0.3%
16%
-19%
-6.9%
36%
17%
21%
20%
-2.2%
15%
39%
36%

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

-25%
-32%
-1.9%
-1.7%
35%
60%
52%
27%
23%
8.3%
9.1%
-5.4%
-16%
12%
45%
71%
06 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Southern Copper Corporation has the highest OPM among the 6 Copper companies compared here, at 58.3%. Hudbay Minerals Inc. is next at 40.3%. Ivanhoe Electric Inc. has the highest Margin change at +414.4 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Southern Copper Corporation leads opm at 58.3%; Ivanhoe Electric Inc. leads margin change at +414.4 percentage points.

LeaderSouthern Copper Corporation · 58.3%
Gap44.7% versus #2 · Hudbay Minerals Inc.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/6 companies · 96 observations

Investor read: Southern Copper Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Margin changefastest expanders
Operating margin · company comparison
5/6 level · 6/6 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Southern Copper Corporation SCCO58%+9.1 ppJun 2026
Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM40%+9.1 ppJun 2026
Ero Copper Corp. ERO35%+0.6 ppMar 2026
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX34%+11.6 ppJun 2026
Trekor Metals Limited TGB33%+10.2 ppMar 2026
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE-255%+414.4 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

51%
53%
44%
35%
8.1%
30%
23%
20%
21%
25%
12%
13%
29%
37%
34%
29%
22%
44%
35%

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

41%
37%
43%
32%
19%
27%
30%
25%
26%
29%
26%
31%
29%
22%
23%
32%
28%
14%
34%

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

-33%
9.1%
33%
11%
5.9%
7.0%
18%
-0.1%
24%
22%
21%
11%
22%
24%
31%
29%
97%
33%
40%

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

-255%

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

56%
54%
53%
35%
37%
49%
49%
39%
43%
38%
46%
52%
50%
47%
49%
52%
52%
55%
58%

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

46%
51%
28%
-46%
-16%
40%
22%
3.2%
35%
35%
14%
37%
14%
1.0%
23%
1.3%
26%
51%
33%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

−24.1 pp
−43.2 pp
−23.1 pp
−21.2 pp
−15.4 pp
+13.1 pp
−4.5 pp
−10.3 pp
−7.4 pp
+7.4 pp
+11.9 pp
+22.0 pp
+16.8 pp
−7.1 pp
+7.2 pp
+0.6 pp

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

−3.9 pp
−21.3 pp
−10.8 pp
−12.8 pp
−7.5 pp
+6.4 pp
+2.6 pp
−3.8 pp
+6.3 pp
+2.9 pp
−7.5 pp
−3.2 pp
+1.2 pp
−0.2 pp
−7.3 pp
+11.6 pp

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

−3.4 pp
+38.7 pp
−2.1 pp
−15.4 pp
−11.2 pp
+18.1 pp
+14.6 pp
+3.5 pp
+10.6 pp
−2.2 pp
+2.0 pp
+9.9 pp
+18.0 pp
+74.9 pp
+9.5 pp
+9.1 pp

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

−12,202.1 pp
−1,774.5 pp
−12,238.4 pp
−5,428.7 pp
+9,357.1 pp
−16,121.9 pp
+13,415.2 pp
−10,117.1 pp
−5,417.2 pp
+13,419.8 pp
+610.6 pp
+12,126.3 pp
+6,862.4 pp
+1,905.5 pp
−2,221.5 pp
+414.4 pp

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

−22.8 pp
−19.7 pp
−5.6 pp
−4.7 pp
+4.1 pp
+6.2 pp
−10.8 pp
−2.7 pp
+12.4 pp
+6.8 pp
+9.2 pp
+3.4 pp
+0.5 pp
+2.9 pp
+7.5 pp
+9.1 pp

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

−74.4 pp
−62.7 pp
−11.4 pp
−5.3 pp
+49.1 pp
+51.5 pp
−4.8 pp
−8.3 pp
+33.4 pp
−21.1 pp
−33.8 pp
+8.8 pp
−35.3 pp
+11.9 pp
+49.6 pp
+10.2 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Ero Copper Corp. has the highest Net profit among the 6 Copper companies compared here, at $296 million. Trekor Metals Limited is next at $15 million. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at the 100% top of the scoring scale. 3 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Ero Copper Corp. leads with $296 million of TTM profit, 19.7× the profit of Trekor Metals Limited. Ero Copper Corp. shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (1380% uncapped) growth from a $296 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderEro Copper Corp. · $296 million
Gap19.7× versus #2 · Trekor Metals Limited
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/6 companies · 114 observations

Investor read: Ero Copper Corp. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
Profit growthfastest growers
Net profit · company comparison
3/6 level · 1/6 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Southern Copper Corporation SCCO$1.6B67%Jun 2026
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX$1.4B75%Jun 2026
Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM$192M94%Jun 2026
Ero Copper Corp. ERO$109M35%Mar 2026
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE$42M-300%Mar 2026
Trekor Metals Limited TGB$17M-253%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

$26M
$60M
$52M
$24M
$4M
$22M
$25M
$30M
$3M
$37M
$-7M
$-53M
$41M
$-49M
$81M
$71M
$37M
$79M
$109M

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

$1.7B
$1.4B
$1.9B
$1.0B
$560M
$977M
$1.0B
$731M
$964M
$1.0B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$721M
$793M
$1.5B
$1.2B
$565M
$1.4B

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

$-170M
$-10M
$64M
$32M
$-8M
$-17M
$5M
$-15M
$45M
$33M
$19M
$-20M
$50M
$19M
$99M
$115M
$222M
$128M
$192M

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

$-18M
$-26M
$-15M
$-54M
$-40M
$-40M
$-36M
$-38M
$-78M
$-47M
$-56M
$-47M
$-43M
$17M
$-31M
$-24M
$-18M
$-34M
$42M

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

$871M
$836M
$788M
$434M
$521M
$905M
$816M
$550M
$622M
$447M
$739M
$954M
$900M
$796M
$949M
$977M
$1.1B
$1.3B
$1.6B

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

$22M
$12M
$5M
$-5M
$-24M
$-2M
$34M
$10M
$1M
$38M
$19M
$-11M
$0M
$-21M
$-29M
$22M
$-28M
$4M
$17M

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

-71%
-85%
-63%
-52%
25%
-25%
68%
-128%
-277%
1,267%
-232%
-9.8%
35%

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

-22%
-68%
-28%
-45%
-30%
72%
3.1%
11%
75%
28%
-28%
-32%
21%
0.9%
-22%
75%

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

-92%
-147%
280%
11%
-42%
421%
344%
574%
94%

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

-300%

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

-54%
-40%
8.3%
3.6%
27%
19%
-51%
-9.4%
73%
45%
78%
28%
2.4%
23%
65%
67%

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

-138%
-209%
-117%
580%
-44%
-210%
-100%
-155%
-253%
08 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Southern Copper Corporation has the highest ROCE among the 6 Copper companies compared here, at 13%. Ero Copper Corp. is next at 5.6%. Ivanhoe Electric Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +18 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 6 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Southern Copper Corporation leads ROCE at 13%, 7.4 percentage points above Ero Copper Corp.. Ivanhoe Electric Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +18 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderSouthern Copper Corporation · 13%
Gap132.1% versus #2 · Ero Copper Corp.
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/6 companies · 116 observations

Investor read: Southern Copper Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCE changefastest improvers
3Ero Copper Corp. ERO+2.5 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
6/6 level · 6/6 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Southern Copper Corporation SCCO13%+3.7 ppJun 2026
Ero Copper Corp. ERO5.6%+2.5 ppMar 2026
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX3.9%−1.0 ppJun 2026
Trekor Metals Limited TGB3.7%+2.0 ppMar 2026
Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM3.6%+0.4 ppJun 2026
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE-21%+18.0 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

14%
15%
6.4%
5.2%
0.9%
4.2%
2.1%
1.9%
2.1%
2.4%
1.1%
1.2%
2.9%
3.5%
3.1%
3.4%
2.6%
9.7%
5.6%

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

6.2%
5.7%
6.9%
4.1%
2.3%
3.5%
3.6%
3.1%
3.3%
3.8%
3.5%
4.3%
4.0%
2.6%
2.7%
4.9%
3.9%
1.6%
4.1%
3.9%

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

-2.8%
0.9%
3.1%
1.1%
0.5%
0.6%
1.3%
0.0%
2.7%
3.0%
2.6%
0.9%
2.2%
2.8%
3.8%
3.2%
6.8%
4.9%
5.6%
3.6%

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

-54%
-69%
-28%
-40%
-54%
-73%
-69%
-38%
-40%
-47%
-53%
-58%
-52%
-39%
-33%
-32%
-26%
-21%

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

9.6%
9.7%
9.2%
5.1%
4.9%
8.5%
8.4%
5.7%
6.8%
5.5%
7.5%
10%
9.1%
8.2%
9.2%
9.3%
10%
14%
13%
13%

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

6.6%
5.5%
3.2%
-3.6%
-1.4%
3.5%
2.2%
0.3%
4.1%
4.1%
1.4%
3.3%
1.4%
0.1%
1.7%
0.1%
2.3%
5.8%
3.7%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

−12.7 pp
−10.4 pp
−4.3 pp
−3.3 pp
+1.2 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.1 pp
+2.0 pp
+2.2 pp
−0.3 pp
+6.2 pp
+2.5 pp

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

−3.9 pp
−2.2 pp
−3.3 pp
−1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.7 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.8 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.1 pp
−1.0 pp
+1.4 pp
−1.0 pp

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

+3.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.1 pp
+2.2 pp
+2.4 pp
+1.3 pp
+0.9 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.2 pp
+1.2 pp
+2.3 pp
+4.6 pp
+2.1 pp
+1.8 pp
+0.4 pp

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

−0.6 pp
−4.1 pp
−41.7 pp
+2.9 pp
+14.1 pp
+26.0 pp
+16.2 pp
−20.9 pp
−11.5 pp
+8.1 pp
+20.5 pp
+26.5 pp
+25.4 pp
+18.0 pp

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

−4.7 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.8 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.9 pp
−3.0 pp
−0.9 pp
+4.4 pp
+2.3 pp
+2.7 pp
+1.7 pp
−0.8 pp
+1.0 pp
+5.4 pp
+3.9 pp
+3.7 pp

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

−8.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+3.9 pp
+5.5 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.8 pp
+3.0 pp
−2.7 pp
−4.0 pp
+0.3 pp
−3.2 pp
+0.9 pp
+5.7 pp
+2.0 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Ero Copper Corp. has the lowest PEG among the 6 Copper companies compared here, at 0.18×. Ivanhoe Electric Inc. has the lowest P/E at -55.3×, so level and change sit with different companies. 1 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Ero Copper Corp. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.18×. Only 1 of 6 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderEro Copper Corp. · 0.18×
GapNot enough peers
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage1/6 companies · 12 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
Valuation · company comparison
1/6 level · 6/6 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
Southern Copper Corporation SCCO0.825.8Jun 2026
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX0.631.0Jun 2026
Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM13.9Jun 2026
Ero Copper Corp. ERO9.5Mar 2026
Trekor Metals Limited TGB179.4Mar 2026
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE-55.3Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

4.4
2.0
0.6

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

2.1
4.1
2.2
0.5
0.4
0.7
1.1
1.1
0.8

P/E · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

8.0
6.9
6.1
4.8
7.2
12.5
22.1
23.5
20.3
16.1
29.7
131.0
71.3
12.3
15.2
11.2
9.5

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

12.4
14.4
14.4
8.9
10.4
15.9
22.9
27.6
25.2
33.3
41.6
36.8
36.4
29.3
31.3
32.8
27.6
33.4
31.3
31.0

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

13.4
18.7
87.4
97.3
25.0
29.2
36.2
36.8
40.6
19.4
14.6
13.1
13.8
12.6
13.9

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

-7.1
-55.3

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

14.3
14.1
17.1
13.2
13.5
17.2
23.1
20.8
20.9
26.4
34.3
29.9
29.3
20.7
20.5
22.4
25.8
27.2
28.8
25.8

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

21.8
19.9
15.1
11.6
47.4
12.3
6.6
12.6
20.9
21.3
179.4
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Copper comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 6 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
11 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 6 Copper companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Copper company comparison FAQs

These 22 answers restate the Copper comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 6 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Copper sector outperforming S&P 500?

Copper has outperformed S&P 500 by 63.2% over 52 weeks and 4.8% over 13 weeks. 5 of 6 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 6 beat the sector itself.

Which Copper company is largest by revenue?

Ero Copper Corp. leads with revenue of $924 million, based on 3 of 6 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Which Copper company is growing fastest?

Ero Copper Corp. has the fastest current revenue growth at 88.6%, across 3 of 6 comparable companies.

Which Copper company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Southern Copper Corporation ranks first at 67.6/100 with 57.8% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Copper company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Ero Copper Corp. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.18, among 1 of 6 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Copper comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Which Copper company is the biggest?

Ero Copper Corp. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $924 million, ahead of Trekor Metals Limited at $771 million. That covers 3 of 6 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.

Which Copper company has the best profit margins?

Southern Copper Corporation has the highest operating margin at 58.3%, from 5 of 6 comparable companies. Ivanhoe Electric Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +414.4 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Copper company makes the most profit?

Ero Copper Corp. earns the most, at $296 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 3 of 6 comparable companies. Ero Copper Corp. has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Copper company earns the highest return on capital?

Southern Copper Corporation leads on return on capital employed at 13%, across 6 of 6 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Copper stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Ero Copper Corp. screens cheapest at 0.18×. Only 1 of 6 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Copper sector beating the market?

Copper has outperformed S&P 500 by 63.2% over the last 52 weeks and 4.8% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 5 of 6 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Copper stock has the strongest price momentum?

Trekor Metals Limited has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Copper company scores highest for research priority?

Southern Copper Corporation scores 67.6 out of 100 with 57.8% evidence confidence, from 21.5 points on growth and earnings, 19.2 on capital efficiency, 9.7 on valuation and 17.2 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Copper companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 6 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Copper sector?

The 6 Copper companies on this page carry $278,115 million of combined market value. Southern Copper Corporation is the largest at $162,828 million, about 59% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.

What is the Copper sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 6 Copper companies on this page is 25.8×, measured on the 5 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.

How is the Copper sector performing?

5 of the 6 covered Copper companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 63.2% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.

How many Copper stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 6 listed Copper companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI