C.E. Info Systems Ltd · MAPMYINDIA
₹57 Cr
₹43 Cr
₹57 Cr
₹65 Cr
₹76 Cr
₹68 Cr
₹72 Cr
₹89 Cr
₹91 Cr
₹92 Cr
₹107 Cr
₹101 Cr
₹104 Cr
₹115 Cr
₹144 Cr
₹122 Cr
₹114 Cr
₹94 Cr
₹145 Cr
₹140 Cr
20-quarter listed-company comparison
Geospatial Stocks in India
Geospatial: Ceinsys Tech Ltd owns the largest revenue base AND the fastest current growth.
The 3 Geospatial companies listed in India are C.E. Info Systems Ltd (₹5.1K Cr, the largest), Genesys International Corporation Ltd and Ceinsys Tech Ltd. 1 of 3 covered companies beats NIFTY 500 on relative strength. Readings are as of 17 Sep 2026.
01 · the index people search for
Nifty Geospatial Index — Constituents & Performance
All 3 listed Indian Geospatial companies are named here, largest first — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Geospatial index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies and carries its own as-of date. One large constituent cannot set the reading.
- C.E. Info Systems Ltd₹5.1K Cr
- Genesys International Corporation Ltd₹2.1K Cr
- Ceinsys Tech Ltd₹1.5K Cr
02 · the sector itself · before any single company
How has Geospatial moved against NIFTY 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 4% behind NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies fell 2% on average over the last four reported quarters.
TURNING · ahead 3w⚠Moving with the index2 of 3 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months1 is 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more
RS ↑3w · 1/3 >200d (+1) · 2/3 lead (+1) · EPS 1/3↑
Geospatial, equal-weighted, based at 200
NIFTY 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Geospatial, equal-weighted, based at 200
NIFTY 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Geospatial, equal-weighted, based at 200
NIFTY 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 3 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
03 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks
Is Geospatial outperforming NIFTY 500?
Geospatial has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 33.1% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 12.2%. 1 of 3 covered companies currently beats NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Genesys International Corporation Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +35.3%.
+12.2%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
-33.1%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
1/3Stocks leading NIFTY 500
1/3Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: current leadership is concentrated, so durability matters more than rank.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Geospatial has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 33.1% over 52 weeks and 12.2% over 13 weeks. 1 of 3 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 3 beat the sector itself. Ceinsys Tech Ltd leads with revenue of ₹662 crore, based on 3 of 3 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Companies
3
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹8.6K Cr
C.E. Info Systems Ltd
Revenue growing
3/3
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
1/3
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 3 of 3
04 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Ceinsys Tech Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 84% evidence confidence.
Genesys International Corporation Ltd has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Ceinsys Tech LtdCEINSYS | 63.4/100Mixed-positive evidence84% evidence | ASLEEP | 31.9/35 Revenue 32.1% · PAT 58.3% · OPM change 5 pp 95% evidence | 19.6/25 ROCE 27.5% · OPM 24% 95% evidence | 11.9/20 P/E 11.1× · PEG — 35% evidence | 0.0/20 RS sector -29.4% · RS bench -31.3% · 1Y -59.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 31.9 + 19.6 + 11.9 + 0 = 63.4 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -29.4% and the one-year return is -59.6%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 2Genesys International Corporation LtdGENESYS | 41.7/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence | TURNING | 4.2/35 Revenue 3.7% · PAT -46.2% · OPM change -7.1 pp 95% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE 8.3% · OPM 34.6% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 59.1× · PEG — 0% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 35.3% · RS bench 29.5% · 1Y -28.3%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.2 + 7.5 + 10 + 20 = 41.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 29.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 3C.E. Info Systems LtdMAPMYINDIA | 33.5/100Adverse evidence91% evidence | TURNING | 3.6/35 Revenue 1.6% · PAT -11.5% · OPM change -5 pp 100% evidence | 17.5/25 ROCE 19.1% · OPM 40% 100% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 36.8× · PEG 2.33 85% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -10.3% · RS bench -24% · 1Y -43.9%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 3.6 + 17.5 + 9.4 + 3 = 33.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
05 · what price has already done
Market action
Genesys International Corporation Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Geospatial at -28.3%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +29.5%. 1 of 3 covered companies is above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-09-11.
Price and relative strength
Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind NIFTY 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS NIFTY 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Geospatial itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
06 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Ceinsys Tech Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 3 Geospatial companies compared here, at ₹662 crore. C.E. Info Systems Ltd is next at ₹493 crore. The same company also holds the highest Revenue growth, at 32.1%. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Ceinsys Tech Ltd is the scale leader at ₹662 crore, 34.3% ahead of C.E. Info Systems Ltd. Ceinsys Tech Ltd's growth is 32.1% from a ₹662 crore base, with 15 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderCeinsys Tech Ltd · ₹662 crore
Gap34.3% versus #2 · C.E. Info Systems Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/3 companies · 50 observations
Investor read: Ceinsys Tech Ltd is the scale benchmark; Ceinsys Tech Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Ceinsys Tech Ltd's growth falls below Ceinsys Tech Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
Revenue growthfastest growers
Revenue · company comparison
3/3 level · 3/3 change
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceinsys Tech Ltd CEINSYS⚠ unverified | ₹158 Cr | 0.6% | Jun 2026 |
| C.E. Info Systems Ltd MAPMYINDIA | ₹140 Cr | 15% | Jun 2026 |
| Genesys International Corporation Ltd GENESYS⚠ unverified | ₹81 Cr | 15% | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Ceinsys Tech Ltd · CEINSYS⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
₹52 Cr
₹73 Cr
₹54 Cr
₹58 Cr
₹63 Cr
₹78 Cr
₹74 Cr
₹90 Cr
₹112 Cr
₹142 Cr
₹157 Cr
₹163 Cr
₹170 Cr
₹171 Cr
₹158 Cr
Genesys International Corporation Ltd · GENESYS⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
₹54 Cr
₹47 Cr
₹35 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹59 Cr
₹71 Cr
₹56 Cr
₹72 Cr
₹89 Cr
₹94 Cr
₹71 Cr
₹77 Cr
₹76 Cr
₹104 Cr
₹81 Cr
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
C.E. Info Systems Ltd · MAPMYINDIA
—
—
—
51%
33%
58%
26%
37%
20%
35%
49%
13%
14%
25%
35%
21%
9.6%
-18%
0.7%
15%
Ceinsys Tech Ltd · CEINSYS⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
21%
6.9%
37%
55%
78%
82%
112%
81%
52%
20%
0.6%
Genesys International Corporation Ltd · GENESYS⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9.0%
51%
61%
117%
50%
32%
27%
6.9%
-15%
11%
15%
07 · compare level, then change
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
C.E. Info Systems Ltd has the highest OPM among the 3 Geospatial companies compared here, at 40%. Genesys International Corporation Ltd is next at 34.6%. Ceinsys Tech Ltd has the highest Margin change at +5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: C.E. Info Systems Ltd leads opm at 40%; Ceinsys Tech Ltd leads margin change at +5 percentage points.
LeaderC.E. Info Systems Ltd · 40%
Gap15.6% versus #2 · Genesys International Corporation Ltd
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/3 companies · 60 observations
Investor read: C.E. Info Systems Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
Margin changefastest expanders
Operating margin · company comparison
3/3 level · 3/3 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| C.E. Info Systems Ltd MAPMYINDIA | 40% | −5.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Genesys International Corporation Ltd GENESYS⚠ unverified | 35% | −7.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Ceinsys Tech Ltd CEINSYS⚠ unverified | 24% | +5.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
C.E. Info Systems Ltd · MAPMYINDIA
46%
36%
44%
46%
40%
41%
40%
42%
44%
38%
37%
42%
36%
36%
38%
45%
23%
26%
44%
40%
Ceinsys Tech Ltd · CEINSYS⚠ unverified
6.5%
13%
10.0%
15%
2.5%
4.0%
30%
21%
17%
17%
16%
18%
19%
19%
19%
19%
22%
23%
24%
24%
Genesys International Corporation Ltd · GENESYS⚠ unverified
27%
35%
27%
28%
29%
36%
35%
17%
23%
52%
51%
37%
41%
48%
53%
42%
39%
21%
33%
35%
Margin change · reported quarter history
C.E. Info Systems Ltd · MAPMYINDIA
—
−4.6 pp
+4.5 pp
+3.5 pp
−6.2 pp
+5.2 pp
−3.6 pp
−4.0 pp
+4.1 pp
−3.0 pp
−3.0 pp
0.0 pp
−8.0 pp
−2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+3.0 pp
−13.0 pp
−10.0 pp
+6.0 pp
−5.0 pp
Ceinsys Tech Ltd · CEINSYS⚠ unverified
−6.5 pp
−6.0 pp
+4.0 pp
−0.7 pp
−4.0 pp
−8.5 pp
+20.0 pp
+5.6 pp
+14.5 pp
+13.0 pp
−14.0 pp
−3.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+5.0 pp
+5.0 pp
Genesys International Corporation Ltd · GENESYS⚠ unverified
−9.1 pp
+7.3 pp
+2.1 pp
+61.5 pp
+2.0 pp
+0.3 pp
+7.9 pp
−10.7 pp
−6.1 pp
+16.3 pp
+15.9 pp
+19.8 pp
+17.6 pp
−4.1 pp
+1.9 pp
+5.0 pp
−1.8 pp
−27.0 pp
−20.1 pp
−7.1 pp
08 · compare level, then change
Profit Scale & Acceleration
C.E. Info Systems Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 3 Geospatial companies compared here, at ₹139 crore. Ceinsys Tech Ltd is next at ₹133 crore. Ceinsys Tech Ltd has the highest Profit growth at 58.3%, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: C.E. Info Systems Ltd leads with ₹139 crore of TTM profit, 4.5% above Ceinsys Tech Ltd. Ceinsys Tech Ltd shows 58.3% growth from a ₹133 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderC.E. Info Systems Ltd · ₹139 crore
Gap4.5% versus #2 · Ceinsys Tech Ltd
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/3 companies · 50 observations
Investor read: C.E. Info Systems Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
Profit growthfastest growers
Net profit · company comparison
3/3 level · 3/3 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| C.E. Info Systems Ltd MAPMYINDIA | ₹50 Cr | 8.7% | Jun 2026 |
| Ceinsys Tech Ltd CEINSYS⚠ unverified | ₹31 Cr | -3.1% | Jun 2026 |
| Genesys International Corporation Ltd GENESYS⚠ unverified | ₹5 Cr | -24% | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
C.E. Info Systems Ltd · MAPMYINDIA
₹25 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹38 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹49 Cr
₹46 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹50 Cr
Ceinsys Tech Ltd · CEINSYS⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
₹3 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹5 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹26 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹31 Cr
Genesys International Corporation Ltd · GENESYS⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
₹8 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹-5 Cr
₹-3 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹5 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹7 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹5 Cr
Profit growth · reported quarter history
C.E. Info Systems Ltd · MAPMYINDIA
—
—
—
14%
0.0%
58%
27%
33%
32%
3.3%
36%
13%
-9.1%
3.2%
29%
28%
-37%
-41%
4.1%
8.7%
Ceinsys Tech Ltd · CEINSYS⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
233%
-43%
50%
140%
80%
83%
167%
117%
117%
68%
-3.1%
Genesys International Corporation Ltd · GENESYS⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
103%
640%
—
—
32%
28%
32%
8.7%
-95%
-33%
-24%
09 · compare level, then change
Return On Capital Employed
Ceinsys Tech Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 3 Geospatial companies compared here, at 27.5%. C.E. Info Systems Ltd is next at 19.1%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +2.2 percentage points. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Ceinsys Tech Ltd leads ROCE at 27.5%, 8.4 percentage points above C.E. Info Systems Ltd. Ceinsys Tech Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +2.2 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderCeinsys Tech Ltd · 27.5%
Gap44% versus #2 · C.E. Info Systems Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/3 companies · 44 observations
Investor read: Ceinsys Tech Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
ROCE changefastest improvers
Return on capital · company comparison
3/3 level · 3/3 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceinsys Tech Ltd CEINSYS⚠ unverified | 20% | +2.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| C.E. Info Systems Ltd MAPMYINDIA | 16% | −4.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Genesys International Corporation Ltd GENESYS⚠ unverified | 6.1% | −8.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
C.E. Info Systems Ltd · MAPMYINDIA
—
—
17%
—
18%
—
20%
—
20%
29%
21%
30%
19%
27%
20%
30%
19%
24%
16%
—
Ceinsys Tech Ltd · CEINSYS⚠ unverified
22%
—
11%
—
9.5%
—
14%
—
19%
32%
16%
26%
13%
27%
17%
33%
22%
35%
20%
—
Genesys International Corporation Ltd · GENESYS⚠ unverified
0.4%
—
3.4%
—
4.8%
—
4.8%
—
1.6%
5.4%
6.9%
12%
13%
17%
15%
17%
13%
12%
6.1%
—
ROCE change · reported quarter history
C.E. Info Systems Ltd · MAPMYINDIA
—
—
—
—
—
—
+2.8 pp
—
+1.8 pp
—
+1.1 pp
—
−1.4 pp
−2.4 pp
−0.8 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.1 pp
−2.8 pp
−4.2 pp
—
Ceinsys Tech Ltd · CEINSYS⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
−12.1 pp
—
+2.3 pp
—
+9.1 pp
—
+2.8 pp
—
−5.9 pp
−5.5 pp
+1.1 pp
+7.0 pp
+9.4 pp
+8.4 pp
+2.2 pp
—
Genesys International Corporation Ltd · GENESYS⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
+4.4 pp
—
+1.4 pp
—
−3.2 pp
—
+2.1 pp
—
+11.3 pp
+11.4 pp
+7.9 pp
+5.8 pp
−0.2 pp
−5.2 pp
−8.7 pp
—
10 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
C.E. Info Systems Ltd has the lowest PEG among the 3 Geospatial companies compared here, at 2.33×. Ceinsys Tech Ltd has the lowest P/E at 11.1×, so level and change sit with different companies. 1 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026. Its PEG series carries 10 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: C.E. Info Systems Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 2.33×. Only 1 of 3 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderC.E. Info Systems Ltd · 2.33×
GapNot enough peers
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage1/3 companies · 10 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
P/Elowest P/E
Valuation · company comparison
1/3 level · 3/3 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| C.E. Info Systems Ltd MAPMYINDIA | 2.3 | 34.2 | Jun 2026 |
| Genesys International Corporation Ltd GENESYS⚠ unverified | — | 40.6 | Jun 2026 |
| Ceinsys Tech Ltd CEINSYS⚠ unverified | — | 14.2 | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
C.E. Info Systems Ltd · MAPMYINDIA
—
—
1.0
0.8
—
1.0
—
1.9
3.0
2.5
3.9
3.9
—
—
7.2
2.3
—
—
—
—
P/E · reported quarter history
C.E. Info Systems Ltd · MAPMYINDIA
—
13.4
12.2
10.5
75.2
61.2
52.1
60.2
92.8
85.1
80.9
92.7
85.0
64.4
67.1
64.2
56.1
62.8
34.9
34.2
Ceinsys Tech Ltd · CEINSYS⚠ unverified
15.9
26.2
26.2
20.8
19.6
17.5
15.4
10.6
9.8
14.8
20.3
23.7
30.1
67.4
43.5
36.0
32.6
20.2
14.5
14.2
Genesys International Corporation Ltd · GENESYS⚠ unverified
113.2
169.3
182.2
31.6
26.6
23.6
17.4
63.8
149.5
137.4
260.3
114.2
100.5
82.6
59.8
49.5
38.2
33.0
23.5
40.6
11 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Geospatial comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 3 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 2 draw at least one figure from a second feed with too little overlap to cross-check. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- 2 companies draw at least one figure from a second data feed with too little overlapping history to cross-check against the primary source; they are marked unverified wherever those figures appear.
- Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
12 · evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 3 Geospatial companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-09-11. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-09-11 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing1 cross-checked · 2 unverified · 0 withheld, of 3 graded companies.
How a second data feed is admitted, and what happens when it disagrees
A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from.
13 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers
Geospatial company comparison FAQs
These 23 answers restate the Geospatial comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 3 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-09-11. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Geospatial sector outperforming NIFTY 500?
Geospatial has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 33.1% over 52 weeks and 12.2% over 13 weeks. 1 of 3 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 3 beat the sector itself.
Which Geospatial company is largest by revenue?
Ceinsys Tech Ltd leads with revenue of ₹662 crore, based on 3 of 3 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Which Geospatial company is growing fastest?
Ceinsys Tech Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 32.1%, across 3 of 3 comparable companies.
Which Geospatial company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Ceinsys Tech Ltd ranks first at 63.4/100 with 84% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Geospatial company has the lowest comparable PEG?
C.E. Info Systems Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 2.33, among 1 of 3 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Geospatial comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Is there a Nifty Geospatial index?
NSE India maintains Nifty indices for several broad sector categories — Nifty Bank, Nifty IT, Nifty Pharma and others — but not for every sub-sector grouping on this site. Whether or not an official Nifty index covers Geospatial, this page builds its own equal-weight basket of 3 listed Geospatial companies — one company, one vote, regardless of market value — so no single large company dominates the reading. Figures are as of Jun 2026.
Which are the best Geospatial stocks in India?
Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Ceinsys Tech Ltd places first among 3 listed Geospatial companies, followed by Genesys International Corporation Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.
How many Geospatial stocks are listed in India?
This comparison covers 3 listed Geospatial companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.
Which Geospatial company is the biggest?
Ceinsys Tech Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹662 crore, ahead of C.E. Info Systems Ltd at ₹493 crore. That covers 3 of 3 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.
Which Geospatial company has the best profit margins?
C.E. Info Systems Ltd has the highest operating margin at 40%, from 3 of 3 comparable companies. Ceinsys Tech Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +5 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Geospatial company makes the most profit?
C.E. Info Systems Ltd earns the most, at ₹139 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 3 of 3 comparable companies. Ceinsys Tech Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 58.3%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Geospatial company earns the highest return on capital?
Ceinsys Tech Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 27.5%, across 3 of 3 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Geospatial stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — C.E. Info Systems Ltd screens cheapest at 2.33×. Only 1 of 3 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Geospatial sector beating the market?
Geospatial has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 33.1% over the last 52 weeks and 12.2% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 1 of 3 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Geospatial stock has the strongest price momentum?
Genesys International Corporation Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Geospatial company scores highest for research priority?
Ceinsys Tech Ltd scores 63.4 out of 100 with 84% evidence confidence, from 31.9 points on growth and earnings, 19.6 on capital efficiency, 11.9 on valuation and 0 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Geospatial companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 3 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Geospatial sector?
The 3 Geospatial companies on this page carry ₹8,608 crore of combined market value. C.E. Info Systems Ltd is the largest at ₹5,070 crore, about 59% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-09-17.
How is the Geospatial sector performing?
1 of the 3 covered Geospatial companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 33.1% behind NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-09-17.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!