Geospatial Stocks and Companies in India

The largest Geospatial stocks in India by market value are C.E. Info Systems (₹4,819 crore), Ceinsys Tech (₹1,357 crore) and Genesys International Corporation (₹1,208 crore), at prices of 4 Nov 2026.

• C.E. Info Systems: ₹794.75 | market value ₹4,819 crore | P/E 31.2
• Ceinsys Tech: ₹647.90 | market value ₹1,357 crore | P/E 10.2
• Genesys International Corporation: ₹180.71 | market value ₹1,208 crore | P/E 34.7

Share price | market value | P/E, biggest first. Prices, market values and ratios at the official close of 4 Nov 2026; the score list below uses the weekly figures.

All 3 listed Indian Geospatial companies are named here, largest first. This is the set of companies people mean when they search for a Nifty Geospatial index; NSE publishes its own indices only for the largest sectors, so this equal-weighted set stands in for one. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies and carries its own as-of date.

1. C.E. Info Systems Ltd₹4,820 cr
2. Ceinsys Tech Ltd₹1,270 cr
3. Genesys International Corporation Ltd₹1,140 cr

3 Geospatial companies in the Geospatial industry group have a page on Sector Alpha, by market value as of 30 October 2026, and all 3 are listed below, largest first. The largest is C.E. Info Systems (₹4,819 crore) and the smallest with a market value is Genesys International Corporation.

Download all 3 Geospatial companies (CSV)

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the last two years (104 weeks) this sector is 44% behind NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies fell 2% on average over the last four reported quarters.

Price down, no fundamental support. 0 of 3 companies pass the momentum test (5+ points ahead of the Nifty 500 over 3 months, within 20% of the 52-week high). 1 is 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more.

Not ahead of NIFTY 500 on the three-month view this week; 0 of the 3 companies in the industry index above their 200-day average (1 fewer than four weeks earlier); 0 of those 3 pass the momentum test (no change from four weeks earlier); earnings rising at 1 of the 3 that report earnings.

Not ahead of NIFTY 500, not building participation, not giving any back. Earnings not confirming, 1 of 3 members have higher trailing twelve-month earnings than a year ago.

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the gap between them tells the story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 3 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member set to 100 at the start and the sector taking the middle value, so a price line pulling away from flat bars means the market is paying more for the same earnings. A bar turns grey when that figure is lower than the quarter before. The rules are fixed and the same everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover or tap any point to read both values and the gap.

Geospatial has done worse than the NIFTY 500 by 43.7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 13.5%. Genesys International Corporation Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at −1.3%.

Geospatial has done worse than the NIFTY 500 by 43.7% over 52 weeks and by 13.5% over 13 weeks. 0 of 3 companies we track are beating the NIFTY on relative strength (how a share price has done against the index over recent months), and 0 of the 2 with a long enough price history are ahead of the industry itself.

A score that ranks each company against the others in its industry. The four parts shown always add up to the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or old evidence affects only its own part, never as a hidden adjustment.

Ceinsys Tech Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 92.6% evidence confidence.

Genesys International Corporation Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Geospatial at −50.6%. It also leads on relative strength against the NIFTY, at −20.6%. 0 of 3 companies we track are ahead of the index on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 30 October 2026.

Price and relative strength

Price · same starting point: Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts: the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

RS vs NIFTY 500: How far ahead of or behind NIFTY 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS NIFTY 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.

RS vs sector: The same measure taken against Geospatial itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.

Biggest one-year moves

Strongest against NIFTY 500

Strongest against the sector itself

The most recent year is decelerating: FY26 Σprofit +12.4% with the aggregate operating margin actually DOWN −449 basis points on a year earlier (33.47%→28.98%), and the capital-flow atom shows capital spending flooding +111.8% with CWIP −99.4%, capacity has just moved onto the books, so depreciation hits before the revenue proves out. Nearly all the earnings lift came from one name (CEINSYS, ~70% of Δprofit), so the aggregate is really one stock. In the week of 13 July 2026, 0% of 3 Geospatial companies were beating the Nifty 500, against 0% on 2 March 2026.

From our industry review of 19 July 2026. A newer review (10 October 2026) did not cover Geospatial, so this is the latest we have.

2 of 3 Geospatial companies held a results call for April to June 2026. Ceinsys Tech guided: Recent awards and the funnel are expected to support growth and strong closures across the next 2-3 quarters, including transport opportunities; intake to surpass last year's level.

From the results calls for April to June 2026.

Big funds, foreign and Indian, cut their stake by 0.5 points over the last two quarters. Founders and promoters kept theirs about the same.

• Spending on new plants and equipment was ₹375 crore in the last 12 months, 134% more than a year before.
• Projects still being built shrank 25% in a year.

Big funds = foreign and Indian institutions, change in their share of ownership across 4 Geospatial companies, in percentage points.

Ownership and spending as of 10 October 2026.

Ceinsys Tech Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 3 Geospatial companies compared here, at ₹662 crore. C.E. Info Systems Ltd is next at ₹511 crore. The same company also has the highest Revenue growth, at 32.1%. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Ceinsys Tech Ltd is the largest at ₹662 crore, 29.5% ahead of C.E. Info Systems Ltd. Ceinsys Tech Ltd's growth is 32.1% from a ₹662 crore base, with 19 reported quarters out of the last 20. Fast growth from a smaller base is not yet the same as proven size.

What this means: Ceinsys Tech Ltd is both the largest and the fastest-growing company here; the growth has to turn into margin and returns before it counts as more than a fast start.

This conclusion weakens if: Ceinsys Tech Ltd's revenue growth slows for two consecutive comparable reports while its operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.

Revenue · company comparison

Revenue · largest

Revenue growth · fastest growers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

Revenue shows both size and speed. A large company can absorb shocks and pay for wide distribution; faster growth can mean market-share gains, new capacity or stronger demand. The best sign is usually growth that lasts without hurting margins and returns.

Genesys International Corporation Ltd has the highest OPM among the 3 Geospatial companies compared here, at 34.6%. C.E. Info Systems Ltd is next at 32%. C.E. Info Systems Ltd has the highest Margin change at +9 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Genesys International Corporation Ltd leads opm at 34.6%; C.E. Info Systems Ltd leads margin change at +9 percentage points.

What this means: Genesys International Corporation Ltd sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.

Operating margin · company comparison

OPM · highest

Margin change · fastest expanders

All-company data · latest reported quarter

C.E. Info Systems Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 3 Geospatial companies compared here, at ₹155 crore. Ceinsys Tech Ltd is next at ₹133 crore. Ceinsys Tech Ltd has the highest Profit growth at 58.3%, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.

What the numbers say: C.E. Info Systems Ltd earns the most, ₹155 crore of profit over the last 12 months, 16.5% above Ceinsys Tech Ltd. A fast rate from a small base matters less than a large profit that keeps coming.

What this means: C.E. Info Systems Ltd sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.

Net profit · company comparison

Net profit · largest

Profit growth · fastest growers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Ceinsys Tech Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 3 Geospatial companies compared here, at 27.7%. C.E. Info Systems Ltd is next at 19.1%. The same company also has the highest ROCE change, at −2.5 percentage points. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Ceinsys Tech Ltd leads ROCE at 27.7%, 8.6 percentage points above C.E. Info Systems Ltd. A high return reported once may be one good year; a high return reported year after year shows a lasting business.

What this means: Ceinsys Tech Ltd sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.

Return on capital · company comparison

ROCE · highest

ROCE change · fastest improvers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Genesys International Corporation Ltd has the lowest PEG among the 3 Geospatial companies compared here, at 1.73×. Ceinsys Tech Ltd is next at 5.48×. Ceinsys Tech Ltd has the lowest P/E at 9.48×, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Genesys International Corporation Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 1.73×, 68.4% below Ceinsys Tech Ltd. That would need today's multiple, the company's own history and steady growth to agree.

What this means: A low valuation is a reason to look closer at the business, not a conclusion on its own.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is worked out the same way every time, as the P/E on the last 12 months of reported earnings divided by that growth rate, never on expected earnings. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.

Valuation · company comparison

PEG · lowest PEG

P/E · lowest P/E

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Geospatial companies show up on 2 of our India lists. The most are on the 52 week high & low list (2 companies).

This Geospatial comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 3 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still come from a very small starting figure.

Keep these limits visible

• A high growth rate can come from a very small starting figure. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
• A high ROCE can be temporary, or look high because the capital base is small. It is best read beside margin, cash flow and how much is spent back on the business.
• The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks published data only. Management quality, upcoming events and risks are not part of it.
• An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 3 Geospatial companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Sep 2026 and market data through 30 October 2026.

Every company's second-feed figures reconcile against the primary source on overlapping reported periods, so nothing here is unverified or withheld.

These 23 answers restate the Geospatial comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 3 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Sep 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 30 October 2026. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.