C.E. Info Systems share price today

C.E. Info Systems Ltd's share price was ₹876.90 at the close on 5 November 2026. It has been falling for 65 weeks. That is 17.3% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹795 and ₹1,816, and at that close it sat 8% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today C.E. Info Systems Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the NIFTY 500, and it has been behind for 6 weeks running.

Over the last 4.9 years the share price moved −39% while the NIFTY 500 moved +47%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 25 September 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Two changes stood out: foreign funds (FIIs) cut their stake for 5 quarters in a row and operating margin down 5 points on a year earlier.

1. Foreign funds (FIIs) cut their stake for 5 quarters in a row

   From 5.4% to 1.2% of the company by the September 2026 quarter.

2. Operating margin down 5 points on a year earlier

   40% in the June 2026 quarter, from 45%.

For July to September 2026 (the quarter ended 30 September 2026), C.E. Info Systems reported revenue of ₹132 crore, up 15.8% from ₹114 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹35.0 crore, up 84.2% from ₹19.0 crore.

C.E. Info Systems results: July to September 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for October to December 2026, are due by 14 February 2027: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

The newest call in our records is from 4 August 2026, about April to June 2026; a call about these results is not in our records yet.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 September 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

C.E. Info Systems closed at ₹876.90 on 5 November 2026, down 51.7% from ₹1,815.50 a year earlier (7 November 2025) and down 38.7% over five years. Its highest weekly close since December 2021 was ₹2,531.50 on 21 June 2024.

C.E. Info Systems share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 5 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

258 weekly closes from 24 December 2021 to 5 November 2026.

5 Nov 2026: C.E. Info Systems closed at ₹876.90, up 10.3% on the week and up 0.4% on the month. Results for July to September 2026: Revenue up 15.8% and profit up 84.2% on a year earlier.

Earlier

• 4 Aug 2026: ex-date for a dividend of ₹3.50 a share.
• 4 Aug 2026: C.E. Info Systems held its results call for April to June 2026. Management guided: FY27 consolidated operating margin goal remains above 35%.

C.E. Info Systems paid ₹3.50 a share in regular dividends in the 12 months to 5 November 2026 (1 payment), a yield of 0.40% at the ₹876.90 close on 5 November 2026. The last was a dividend of ₹3.50 a share, ex-date 4 August 2026.

C.E. Info Systems dividends since 1 April 2021

Amounts as the company declared them on the NSE. A dividend goes to whoever owns the shares before the ex-date.

Yes. C.E. Info Systems Ltd paid out 14% of its profit as dividends in FY26, and it paid a dividend in 5 of its last 8 reported years.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

On the call for April to June 2026, held on 4 August 2026, C.E. Info Systems' management guided: FY27 consolidated operating margin goal remains above 35%.

“Anmol, it was not, and it is not, a reduction in the contract. For some of the vehicles, the OEM probably decided not to have the entire technology - not just ours, but all the technology related to that - in the vehicle last year.”Rakesh Verma, on the call for April to June 2026

What management guided

• More vehicles may adopt the affected OEM technology; contract timing could extend or change.
• New IoT hardware deployments expected to generate SaaS revenue in subsequent periods.
• AI-native product development, offerings and organisation to accelerate future growth.
• Open order book expected to support future growth through execution.

Management’s own plans and goals, from our notes of the call. A plan is not a result.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for April to June 2026, 4 August 2026. The July to September 2026 results are out since, so this part may be out of date until we update it.

When C.E. Info Systems reports October to December 2026, these are the 3 checks that show whether the story is still on course. First: Automotive OEM timing: check whether additional vehicles adopt the technology and revenue shifts into later periods.

C.E. Info Systems is on one of our India lists: 52 week high & low.

C.E. Info Systems Ltd earned ₹35.0 Cr of net profit in the Sep 2026 quarter, +84.2% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 3rd quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹134 Cr. Over 7 years profit has grown 21.6% a year on average. That is 26.5% of the quarter's revenue.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹19.0 Cr.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹134 Cr (−9.5% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +15.8% on a year earlier and the margin moved +9.0 percentage points. Most of the change came from keeping more of each sale.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +14.1% and revenue +3.3%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra rupee of revenue adds more to profit.

C.E. Info Systems Ltd reported ₹132 Cr of revenue in the Sep 2026 quarter, +15.8% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 3rd quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 7 years it has grown 19.7% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹474 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹511 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹474 Cr, +2.4% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +3.3% on average, against 19.7% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +3.2%, against +12.5% a year over the last 8 quarters (rolling over); profit over the last 12 months grew +6.2%, against +7.2% a year (stabilising).

C.E. Info Systems Ltd's operating margin was 32.0% in the Sep 2026 quarter, 9.0 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 8 years it has been between 19.0% and 43.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +9.2 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −6.8 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years, 69% of C.E. Info Systems Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so most of the profit is real cash. In FY26 it brought in ₹93.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹134 Cr of profit. After ₹45.0 Cr of spending on assets, ₹48.0 Cr was left over as free cash.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 69% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 166 days shorter between FY21 and FY26, so cash that used to wait in the business now arrives sooner. When less than 70% of profit comes in as cash, it is the thing to watch on this page.

What to look at next: the bigger use of cash is spending on new assets, at 1.8× depreciation over three years. The next section checks what that spending is building.

C.E. Info Systems Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was −123 days in FY26, down from 43 days in FY21. It spent ₹115 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 136 days to pay, and stock sits for 119 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹474 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹1.3 Cr, so roughly −₹160 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 136 days to pay and stock sat for 119 days, about 3.9 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of −123 days, shorter than FY21's 43.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 119 days. Customers pay about 136 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 378 days. Together that makes the −123-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹115 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹65.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹8.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

C.E. Info Systems Ltd's P/E is 31.2×, about the lowest it has ever been. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 70.4×, over 4.9 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved −9.4% while the price moved −51.7%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

Where the price move came from: over 5 years the price moved −9.3% a year; about +25.7% a year came from earnings growth and about −35.0 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

C.E. Info Systems Ltd's business is giving mixed signals. There is no clear direction across the growth lines, with ROCE falling at 22.2%; each line tells part of the story. This is based on 12 quarters of 4 measures.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: when the lines disagree, each line above matters more than any single label.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

C.E. Info Systems Ltd earned a ROCE of 19% in FY26. That is up from a low of 10% in FY20. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 5.5 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 28.3% net margin and 0.46× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 28.3% net margin × 0.46× asset turnover × 1.15× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 15.0% on equity. The margin does most of the work; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 17.5% − 12.0% = +5.5 percentage points. The 12.0% is a standard assumption for the cost of capital in India, not an estimate for this company. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. A gap this wide means each rupee put back into the business creates more than a rupee of value.

The 17.5% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY26 at 18.5%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method.

C.E. Info Systems Ltd has total debt of ₹7.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹905 Cr as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 0.01× its equity, which is very little. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.04 in FY22 to 0.01 in FY26. So the returns on this page come from the business, not from borrowed money.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

Domestic institutions raised their stake in C.E. Info Systems Ltd by 7.0 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Domestic institutions now own 12.8% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −5.3 points over the same period, to 1.2%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Domestic institutions: +7.0 points over 8 quarters, to 12.8%; Foreign institutions: −5.3 points over 8 quarters, to 1.2%; Promoters: −0.3 points over 8 quarters, to 51.4%.

Why the owners changed: foreign institutions moved −5.3 points and domestic institutions +7.0 points over 8 quarters, while promoters stayed about the same. One group of institutions took over shares from the other; it is not a change of mind by the people running the company.

For C.E. Info Systems Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

47.5 out of 100, rank 2 of 3 in Geospatial, with 82% of the evidence available.

C.E. Info Systems Ltd scores 47.5 out of 100 against the 3 companies it is compared with in Geospatial, ranking 2. The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 13 + 18.5 + 8.5 + 7.5 = 47.5. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

C.E. Info Systems ranks 2 of 3 Geospatial companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 47.5 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Geospatial, all 3 compared on one page.

C.E. Info Systems is the largest of 3 Geospatial companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). It is the largest. Just below it: Ceinsys Tech and Genesys International Corporation.

Geospatial companies close in size

1. C.E. Info Systems Ltd ₹4,819 crore
2. Ceinsys Tech Ltd ₹1,269 crore
3. Genesys International Corporation Ltd ₹1,144 crore

All 3 Geospatial companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

844. Jamna Auto Industries Ltd ₹4,834 crore · Auto & Auto Ancl - CV
845. SMS Pharmaceuticals Ltd ₹4,831 crore · Pharma - API & CRAMS
846. C.E. Info Systems Ltd ₹4,819 crore
847. Senco Gold Ltd ₹4,803 crore · Diamond, Gems & Jewellery
848. Prasol Chemicals Ltd ₹4,765 crore

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 5 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.