Miller Industries share price today

Miller Industries, Inc.'s share price was $52.07 at the close on 4 November 2026. That is 6.0% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $37 and $57, and at that close it sat 74% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the S&P 500, and it has been behind for 3 weeks running.

Over the last 1 year the share price moved +16% while the S&P 500 moved +23%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 16 October 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Miller Industries, Inc. paid $0.82 per share over the last four reported quarters. The most recent declaration was $0.21 for Jun 2026. At today's price of $52.07 that is a yield of 1.57%, based on dividends already paid, not a forecast.

A dividend is cash paid out for each share. The 12-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.

Miller Industries is not in the Nasdaq 100, the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones 30, and is not on the US tech stocks list.

Miller Industries, Inc. earned $7.3 M of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, −14.1% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY25 profit was $23.0 M. Over 4 years profit has grown 9.1% a year on average. That is 3.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $8.5 M.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY25 profit was $23.0 M (−63.8% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +12.1% on a year earlier and the margin moved −0.7 percentage points. Sales did the work, and the margin was about flat.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed −63.7% and revenue −18.3%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

Miller Industries, Inc. reported $240 M of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +12.1% on the same quarter a year earlier. Over 4 years it has grown 2.4% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at $790 M. The last four reported quarters add to $771 M.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

FY25 revenue was $790 M, −37.2% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew −18.3% on average, against 2.4% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew −20.9%, against −22.7% a year over the last 8 quarters (stabilising); profit over the last 12 months grew −66.3%, against −55.3% a year (rolling over).

Miller Industries, Inc.'s operating margin was 4.5% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 0.7 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 years it has been between 3.3% and 6.8%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every $100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −0.7 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −1.2 points. So the drop came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years, 87% of Miller Industries, Inc.'s reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY25 it brought in $98.7 M of operating cash against $23.0 M of profit. After $13.7 M of spending on assets, $85.0 M was left over as free cash.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason.

What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Miller Industries, Inc. does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent $41.2 M on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 1.7% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn.

Spending on assets: $41.2 M over the last 3 years.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Miller Industries, Inc.'s P/E is 34.5×, with too little history to compare. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved −63.8% while the price moved +32.3%. The price did better than earnings, which pushed the multiple up within its own range.

In short: there is too little history to say whether the multiple is high or low for this company, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Miller Industries, Inc.'s business is getting worse. Revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking: revenue growth is −20.9% in the latest quarter, against +35.9% at its best in 12 quarters, with ROCE falling at 4.9%. This is based on 12 quarters of 4 measures.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: falling lines mean any ratio below that looks low should be read with that direction in mind.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the stock price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Miller Industries, Inc. earned a ROE of 6% in FY25. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 6.2 percentage points below its cost of capital, so growth here does not yet pay for the capital it uses. It comes from a 2.9% net margin and 1.34× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. We do not have the full capital split, so ROE is the longest history we can draw here.

Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 2.9% net margin × 1.34× asset turnover × 1.40× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 5.4% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 5.0% − 11.2% = −6.2 percentage points. The 11.2% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Negative: growth at these returns loses value until returns improve.

Miller Industries, Inc. has total debt of $5.7 M against shareholder equity of $420 M as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 0.01× its equity, which is very little. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.00 in FY21 to 0.08 in FY25. So the returns on this page come from the business, not from borrowed money.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

4.0% of Miller Industries, Inc.'s tradable shares are in short positions, which are bets that the price will fall, so some traders are betting against it. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 5.8 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead.

There is no quarter-by-quarter list of owners here, so we look at short interest: the share of tradable shares held in short positions, which gain if the price falls.

It is a single reading at one point in time; we do not have its history.

Why it is at this level: the figure does not say who has the short positions or why, so we show the level without guessing the story.

For Miller Industries, Inc., the Z-score is 4.10. A Z-score above about 3 is safe and below about 1.8 signals danger, so this is well clear of danger. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 4.10 is well clear of the danger zone, so the balance sheet is not the risk here.

There is no score against its industry: Miller Industries, Inc. is not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison for Auto Parts.

The score ranks a company within its industry: each measure is scored against the other members. Without that group there is no score, so none is shown.

No sector comparison is shown here, not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison.

Miller Industries is the 32nd largest of 43 Auto Parts companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 4 November 2026). Just above it: Standard Motor Products, Inc., Douglas Dynamics, Inc. and Fox Factory Holding Corp. Just below it: Hyliion Holdings Corp., Solid Power, Inc. and Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc.

Auto Parts companies close in size

29. Standard Motor Products, Inc. $1 billion
30. Douglas Dynamics, Inc. $880 million
31. Fox Factory Holding Corp. $730 million
32. Miller Industries, Inc. $591 million
33. Hyliion Holdings Corp. $536 million
34. Solid Power, Inc. $514 million
35. Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. $392 million

All 43 Auto Parts companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

2766. Weave Communications, Inc. $592 million · Health Information Services
2767. Crescent Biopharma, Inc. $592 million · Biotechnology
2768. Miller Industries, Inc. $591 million
2769. Kearny Financial Corp. $589 million · Banks - Regional
2770. BlueLinx Holdings Inc. $586 million · Industrial Distribution

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.