Luxury Goods Stocks
Luxury Goods: Tapestry, Inc. owns the largest revenue base; LuxExperience B.V. has the fastest current growth.
How has Luxury Goods moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 104% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 15% on average over the last four reported quarters.
RS ↑2w · 6/7 >200d (+3) · 4/7 lead (+2) · EPS 6/7↑
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 7 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Is Luxury Goods outperforming S&P 500?
Luxury Goods has outperformed S&P 500 by 21.8% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 2.4%. 3 of 9 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Movado Group, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +43.1%.
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Luxury Goods has outperformed S&P 500 by 21.8% over 52 weeks and 2.4% over 13 weeks. 3 of 9 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 9 beat the sector itself. Tapestry, Inc. leads with revenue of $7,851 million, based on 8 of 9 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Envela CorporationELA | 79.3/100Favorable setup75% evidence | FADING | 30.3/35 Revenue 54.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change 4.9 pp 83% evidence | 18.6/25 ROCE 14.6% · OPM 11.4% 76% evidence | 14.5/20 P/E 20.6× · PEG 0.49 65% evidence | 15.9/20 RS sector 34.2% · RS bench 31.4% · 1Y 266.1%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 30.3 + 18.6 + 14.5 + 15.9 = 79.3 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Movado Group, Inc.MOV | 69.9/100Favorable setup79% evidence | LEADER | 23.9/35 Revenue 4.4% · PAT 83.3% · OPM change 4.7 pp 95% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 4.9% 76% evidence | 15.0/20 P/E 19.5× · PEG 0.45 65% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 43.1% · RS bench 40.7% · 1Y 155.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.9 + 14 + 15 + 17 = 69.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Tapestry, Inc.TPR | 63.7/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | TURNING | 20.7/35 Revenue 14.1% · PAT -22.8% · OPM change 6.3 pp 83% evidence | 16.3/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 22.3% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 44.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.7/20 RS sector 9.3% · RS bench 7.6% · 1Y 43%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.7 + 16.3 + 9 + 17.7 = 63.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4The RealReal, Inc.REAL | 51.7/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | TURNING | 23.4/35 Revenue 17.2% · PAT — · OPM change 6.8 pp 62% evidence | 7.2/25 ROCE -1.5% · OPM -1.2% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 11.1/20 RS sector 0.7% · RS bench -1.1% · 1Y 98.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.4 + 7.2 + 10 + 11.1 = 51.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Signet Jewelers LimitedSIG | 47.4/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | TURNING | 7.8/35 Revenue -5.2% · PAT -63% · OPM change -0.7 pp 95% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 2.4% 76% evidence | 16.5/20 P/E 1.2× · PEG 0.04 65% evidence | 11.6/20 RS sector -2.5% · RS bench -3.7% · 1Y 31%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.8 + 11.5 + 16.5 + 11.6 = 47.4 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 6Capri Holdings LimitedCPRI | 40.3/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | BASING | 16.0/35 Revenue -4.1% · PAT — · OPM change 3.5 pp 62% evidence | 9.5/25 ROCE -0.9% · OPM -3.4% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 15.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.3/20 RS sector -27.6% · RS bench -28.6% · 1Y -16.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16 + 9.5 + 10.5 + 4.3 = 40.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7LuxExperience B.V.LUXE | 38.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 15.1/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change -2.6 pp 62% evidence | 5.8/25 ROCE -3.2% · OPM -4.8% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 1.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.4/20 RS sector -9.5% · RS bench -10.7% · 1Y 5.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 5.8 + 11 + 6.4 = 38.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.BRLT | 27.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 10.4/35 Revenue 5.7% · PAT — · OPM change -5.1 pp 62% evidence | 5.2/25 ROCE -6.2% · OPM -8.9% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 70× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -44.5% · RS bench -44.8% · 1Y -40%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.4 + 5.2 + 8.5 + 3 = 27.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Lanvin Group Holdings LimitedLANV | 36.8/100Thin evidence · provisional29% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence | 6.8/25 ROCE -143.7% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 4.1/20 RS sector -38.2% · RS bench -38.8% · 1Y -44.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.9 + 6.8 + 10 + 4.1 = 36.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Market action
Envela Corporation has the strongest one-year price move in Luxury Goods at +266.1%. Movado Group, Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +40.7%. 3 of 9 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.
Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Luxury Goods itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Tapestry, Inc. has the highest Revenue among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at $7,851 million. Signet Jewelers Limited is next at $6,826 million. LuxExperience B.V. has the highest Revenue growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Revenue series carries 18 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Tapestry, Inc. is the scale leader at $7,851 million, 15% ahead of Signet Jewelers Limited. LuxExperience B.V.'s growth is stored at the ≥100% scoring cap; the uncapped TTM change is 172.4% from a $2,427 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
Investor read: Tapestry, Inc. is the scale benchmark; LuxExperience B.V. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Tapestry, Inc.'s growth falls below LuxExperience B.V.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tapestry, Inc. TPR | $1.9B | 21% | Mar 2026 |
| Signet Jewelers Limited SIG | $1.6B | 0.8% | Jun 2026 |
| Capri Holdings Limited CPRI | $796M | -3.8% | Mar 2026 |
| LuxExperience B.V. LUXE | $618M | 154% | Mar 2026 |
| The RealReal, Inc. REAL | $190M | 19% | Mar 2026 |
| Movado Group, Inc. MOV | $142M | 7.6% | Jun 2026 |
| Lanvin Group Holdings Limited LANV | $107M | -32% | Dec 2025 |
| Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT | $100M | 6.4% | Mar 2026 |
| Envela Corporation ELA | $98M | 104% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI
Envela Corporation · ELA
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV
LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE
Movado Group, Inc. · MOV
Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG
Tapestry, Inc. · TPR
The RealReal, Inc. · REAL
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT
Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI
Envela Corporation · ELA
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV
LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE
Movado Group, Inc. · MOV
Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG
Tapestry, Inc. · TPR
The RealReal, Inc. · REAL
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
Tapestry, Inc. has the highest OPM among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at 22.3%. Envela Corporation is next at 11.4%. The RealReal, Inc. has the highest Margin change at +6.8 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 8 of 9 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Tapestry, Inc. leads opm at 22.3%; The RealReal, Inc. leads margin change at +6.8 percentage points.
Investor read: Tapestry, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tapestry, Inc. TPR | 22% | +6.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Envela Corporation ELA | 11% | +4.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Movado Group, Inc. MOV | 4.9% | +4.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Signet Jewelers Limited SIG | 2.4% | −0.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| The RealReal, Inc. REAL | -1.2% | +6.8 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Capri Holdings Limited CPRI | -3.4% | +3.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| LuxExperience B.V. LUXE | -4.8% | −2.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT | -8.9% | −5.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT
Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI
Envela Corporation · ELA
LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE
Movado Group, Inc. · MOV
Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG
Tapestry, Inc. · TPR
The RealReal, Inc. · REAL
Margin change · reported quarter history
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT
Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI
Envela Corporation · ELA
LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE
Movado Group, Inc. · MOV
Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG
Tapestry, Inc. · TPR
The RealReal, Inc. · REAL
Profit Scale & Acceleration
Tapestry, Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at $663 million. LuxExperience B.V. is next at $457 million. Envela Corporation has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Net profit series carries 18 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Tapestry, Inc. leads with $663 million of TTM profit, 45.1% above LuxExperience B.V.. Envela Corporation shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (162.5% uncapped) growth from a $21 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
Investor read: Tapestry, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tapestry, Inc. TPR | $344M | 69% | Mar 2026 |
| The RealReal, Inc. REAL | $39M | -37% | Mar 2026 |
| Signet Jewelers Limited SIG | $32M | -5.9% | Jun 2026 |
| Envela Corporation ELA | $9M | 350% | Mar 2026 |
| Movado Group, Inc. MOV | $7M | 600% | Jun 2026 |
| Capri Holdings Limited CPRI | $1M | 850% | Mar 2026 |
| Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT | $-8M | -133% | Mar 2026 |
| LuxExperience B.V. LUXE | $-31M | -350% | Mar 2026 |
| Lanvin Group Holdings Limited LANV | $-177M | — | Dec 2025 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT
Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI
Envela Corporation · ELA
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV
LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE
Movado Group, Inc. · MOV
Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG
Tapestry, Inc. · TPR
The RealReal, Inc. · REAL
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT
Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI
Envela Corporation · ELA
LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE
Movado Group, Inc. · MOV
Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG
Tapestry, Inc. · TPR
The RealReal, Inc. · REAL
Return On Capital Employed
Envela Corporation has the highest ROCE among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at 14.6%. Tapestry, Inc. is next at 8%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +9.9 percentage points. 9 of 9 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026. Its ROCE series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Envela Corporation leads ROCE at 14.6%, 6.6 percentage points above Tapestry, Inc.. Envela Corporation has the strongest latest improvement at +9.9 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
Investor read: Envela Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Envela Corporation ELA | 15% | +9.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Tapestry, Inc. TPR | 8.0% | +5.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Movado Group, Inc. MOV | 1.1% | +1.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Signet Jewelers Limited SIG | 0.9% | −0.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Capri Holdings Limited CPRI | -0.9% | +0.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| The RealReal, Inc. REAL | -1.5% | +4.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| LuxExperience B.V. LUXE | -3.2% | −2.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT | -6.2% | −4.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Lanvin Group Holdings Limited LANV | -144% | −127.0 pp | Dec 2025 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT
Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI
Envela Corporation · ELA
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV
LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE
Movado Group, Inc. · MOV
Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG
Tapestry, Inc. · TPR
The RealReal, Inc. · REAL
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT
Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI
Envela Corporation · ELA
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV
LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE
Movado Group, Inc. · MOV
Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG
Tapestry, Inc. · TPR
The RealReal, Inc. · REAL
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
Signet Jewelers Limited has the lowest PEG among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at 0.04×. Movado Group, Inc. is next at 0.45×. The same company also holds the lowest P/E, at 1.2×. 3 of 9 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Signet Jewelers Limited has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.04×, 91.1% below Movado Group, Inc.. Only 3 of 9 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Envela Corporation ELA | 0.5 | 20.6 | Mar 2026 |
| Movado Group, Inc. MOV | 0.5 | 19.5 | Jun 2026 |
| Signet Jewelers Limited SIG | 0.0 | 1.2 | Jun 2026 |
| Tapestry, Inc. TPR | — | 44.5 | Mar 2026 |
| Capri Holdings Limited CPRI | — | 15.2 | Mar 2026 |
| LuxExperience B.V. LUXE | — | 1.9 | Mar 2026 |
| Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT | — | 70.0 | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
Envela Corporation · ELA
Movado Group, Inc. · MOV
Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG
P/E · reported quarter history
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT
Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI
Envela Corporation · ELA
LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE
Movado Group, Inc. · MOV
Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG
Tapestry, Inc. · TPR
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Luxury Goods comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 1 of the 9 companies reports on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so its rank is marked stale. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- 1 company has an older fundamental reporting date than the sector’s freshest reporters; its rank carries a stale marker.
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 9 Luxury Goods companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
Luxury Goods company comparison FAQs
These 22 answers restate the Luxury Goods comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 9 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Luxury Goods sector outperforming S&P 500?
Luxury Goods has outperformed S&P 500 by 21.8% over 52 weeks and 2.4% over 13 weeks. 3 of 9 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 9 beat the sector itself.
Which Luxury Goods company is largest by revenue?
Tapestry, Inc. leads with revenue of $7,851 million, based on 8 of 9 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Luxury Goods company is growing fastest?
LuxExperience B.V. has the fastest current revenue growth at 100%, across 8 of 9 comparable companies.
Which Luxury Goods company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Envela Corporation ranks first at 79.3/100 with 75.1% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Luxury Goods company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Signet Jewelers Limited has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.04, among 3 of 9 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Luxury Goods comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Which Luxury Goods company is the biggest?
Tapestry, Inc. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $7,851 million, ahead of Signet Jewelers Limited at $6,826 million. That covers 8 of 9 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Luxury Goods company has the best profit margins?
Tapestry, Inc. has the highest operating margin at 22.3%, from 8 of 9 comparable companies. The RealReal, Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +6.8 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Luxury Goods company makes the most profit?
Tapestry, Inc. earns the most, at $663 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 8 of 9 comparable companies. Envela Corporation has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Luxury Goods company earns the highest return on capital?
Envela Corporation leads on return on capital employed at 14.6%, across 9 of 9 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Luxury Goods stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Signet Jewelers Limited screens cheapest at 0.04×. Only 3 of 9 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Luxury Goods sector beating the market?
Luxury Goods has outperformed S&P 500 by 21.8% over the last 52 weeks and 2.4% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 3 of 9 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Luxury Goods stock has the strongest price momentum?
Movado Group, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Luxury Goods company scores highest for research priority?
Envela Corporation scores 79.3 out of 100 with 75.1% evidence confidence, from 30.3 points on growth and earnings, 18.6 on capital efficiency, 14.5 on valuation and 15.9 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Luxury Goods companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 9 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Luxury Goods sector?
The 9 Luxury Goods companies on this page carry $41,621 million of combined market value. Tapestry, Inc. is the largest at $31,513 million, about 76% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.
What is the Luxury Goods sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 9 Luxury Goods companies on this page is 19.5×, measured on the 7 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.
How is the Luxury Goods sector performing?
3 of the 9 covered Luxury Goods companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 21.8% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.
How many Luxury Goods stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 9 listed Luxury Goods companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.