Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-16
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Luxury Goods Stocks

Luxury Goods: Tapestry, Inc. owns the largest revenue base; LuxExperience B.V. has the fastest current growth.

01 · the industry itself · before any single company

How has Luxury Goods moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 39% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 81% on average over the last four reported quarters.

FADING · −1 in 4wPrice and the fundamentals both up2 of the 7 companies with a long enough price record ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS — · 3/7 >200d (+2) · 2/7 lead (−1) · EPS 7/7↑

20020262025202420232022 388347 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100119Jun 22Dec 22Jun 23Dec 23Jun 24Dec 24Jun 25Dec 25Jun 26Jun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 5 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 5 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 104, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 7 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 97, against 100 at the start · up 42.5% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · up 6.5% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · down 6.5% on a year ago · 7 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 65, against 100 at the start · down 45.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 60, against 100 at the start · down 54.9% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 47, against 100 at the start · down 58.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 31, against 100 at the start · down 55.9% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 21, against 100 at the start · down 63.8% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 19, against 100 at the start · down 28.0% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 18, against 100 at the start · down 63.3% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 35, against 100 at the start · up 11.7% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 39, against 100 at the start · up 69.1% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 84, against 100 at the start · up 43.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 84, against 100 at the start · up 200.0% on a year ago · 3 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two84 · Jun 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
20020262025202420232022 388347 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100119Jun 22Jun 23Jun 24Jun 25Jun 26Jun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 5 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 5 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 104, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 7 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 97, against 100 at the start · up 42.5% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · up 6.5% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · down 6.5% on a year ago · 7 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 65, against 100 at the start · down 45.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 60, against 100 at the start · down 54.9% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 47, against 100 at the start · down 58.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 31, against 100 at the start · down 55.9% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 21, against 100 at the start · down 63.8% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 19, against 100 at the start · down 28.0% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 18, against 100 at the start · down 63.3% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 35, against 100 at the start · up 11.7% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 39, against 100 at the start · up 69.1% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 84, against 100 at the start · up 43.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 84, against 100 at the start · up 200.0% on a year ago · 3 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two84No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Luxury Goods, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of 7 of its 9 companies — the 2 with too short a price record are ranked in the scorecard but cannot sit in this line. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Luxury Goods outperforming S&P 500?

Luxury Goods has underperformed S&P 500 by 6.6% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 14.9%. 2 of 9 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Movado Group, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +25.6%.

-14.9%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
-6.6%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
2/9Stocks leading S&P 500
3/9Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Luxury Goods has underperformed S&P 500 by 6.6% over 52 weeks and 14.9% over 13 weeks. 2 of 9 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 3 of 9 beat the sector itself. Tapestry, Inc. leads with revenue of $8,005 million, based on 8 of 9 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Companies
9
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$32.8B
Tapestry, Inc.
Revenue growing
6/8
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
2/9
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 9
03 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Movado Group, Inc. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 79.3% evidence confidence.
Signet Jewelers Limited looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
Signet Jewelers Limited has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Movado Group, Inc.MOV 70.0/100Favorable setup79% evidence FADING 24.5/35 Revenue 4.4% · PAT 83.3% · OPM change 4.7 pp 95% evidence 14.0/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 4.9% 76% evidence 14.5/20 P/E 19.5× · PEG 0.45 65% evidence 17.0/20 RS sector 25.6% · RS bench 14.1% · 1Y 69%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 24.5 + 14 + 14.5 + 17 = 70 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Envela CorporationELA 69.0/100Favorable setup75% evidence ASLEEP 30.9/35 Revenue 54.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change 4.9 pp 83% evidence 17.7/25 ROCE 14.6% · OPM 11.4% 76% evidence 14.0/20 P/E 20.6× · PEG 0.49 65% evidence 6.4/20 RS sector -15.5% · RS bench -23.8% · 1Y 61.1%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 30.9 + 17.7 + 14 + 6.4 = 69 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -15.5% and the one-year return is 61.1%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
3Tapestry, Inc.TPR 60.5/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence ASLEEP 23.3/35 Revenue 14.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2.5 pp 71% evidence 21.2/25 ROCE 37.3% · OPM 19.8% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E 19.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.0/20 RS sector -8% · RS bench -16.9% · 1Y 3.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.3 + 21.2 + 10 + 6 = 60.5 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -8% and the one-year return is 3.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
4Signet Jewelers LimitedSIG 54.7/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence TURNING 7.8/35 Revenue -5.2% · PAT -63% · OPM change -0.7 pp 95% evidence 11.5/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 2.4% 76% evidence 16.5/20 P/E 1.2× · PEG 0.04 65% evidence 18.9/20 RS sector 17.1% · RS bench 6% · 1Y 7.4%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 7.8 + 11.5 + 16.5 + 18.9 = 54.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 6%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
5The RealReal, Inc.REAL 45.9/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence ASLEEP 23.4/35 Revenue 17.2% · PAT — · OPM change 6.8 pp 62% evidence 7.2/25 ROCE -1.5% · OPM -1.2% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 5.3/20 RS sector -16.5% · RS bench -24.7% · 1Y -12.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 23.4 + 7.2 + 10 + 5.3 = 45.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6LuxExperience B.V.LUXE 45.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 15.1/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change -2.6 pp 62% evidence 5.8/25 ROCE -3.2% · OPM -4.8% 76% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 1.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.6/20 RS sector 9.1% · RS bench -1.4% · 1Y 2.4%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.1 + 5.8 + 11 + 13.6 = 45.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Capri Holdings LimitedCPRI 38.2/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence BASING 16.5/35 Revenue -4.1% · PAT — · OPM change 3.5 pp 62% evidence 9.5/25 ROCE -0.9% · OPM -3.4% 76% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 15.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.7/20 RS sector -23.5% · RS bench -31.2% · 1Y -28.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.5 + 9.5 + 10.5 + 1.7 = 38.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.BRLT 31.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 10.4/35 Revenue 5.7% · PAT — · OPM change -5.1 pp 62% evidence 5.2/25 ROCE -6.2% · OPM -8.9% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 70× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.6/20 RS sector -9.4% · RS bench -18% · 1Y -44.1%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.4 + 5.2 + 8.5 + 7.6 = 31.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9Lanvin Group Holdings LimitedLANV 35.7/100Thin evidence · provisional29% evidence BASING 15.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence 6.8/25 ROCE -143.7% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -33.2% · RS bench -39.8% · 1Y -49.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.9 + 6.8 + 10 + 3 = 35.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
04 · what price has already done

Market action

Movado Group, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Luxury Goods at +69%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +14.1%. 2 of 9 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-09-16.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Tapestry, Inc. has the highest Revenue among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at $8,005 million. Signet Jewelers Limited is next at $6,826 million. LuxExperience B.V. has the highest Revenue growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Revenue series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Tapestry, Inc. is the scale leader at $8,005 million, 17.3% ahead of Signet Jewelers Limited. LuxExperience B.V.'s growth is stored at the ≥100% scoring cap; the uncapped TTM change is 172.4% from a $2,427 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderTapestry, Inc. · $8,005 million
Gap17.3% versus #2 · Signet Jewelers Limited
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage8/9 companies · 161 observations

Investor read: Tapestry, Inc. is the scale benchmark; LuxExperience B.V. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Tapestry, Inc.'s growth falls below LuxExperience B.V.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Tapestry, Inc. TPR$8.0B
Revenue growthfastest growers
Revenue · company comparison
8/9 level · 8/9 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Tapestry, Inc. TPR$1.9B8.9%Jun 2026
Signet Jewelers Limited SIG$1.6B0.8%Jun 2026
Capri Holdings Limited CPRI$796M-3.8%Mar 2026
LuxExperience B.V. LUXE$618M154%Mar 2026
The RealReal, Inc. REAL$190M19%Mar 2026
Movado Group, Inc. MOV$142M7.6%Jun 2026
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited LANV$107M-32%Dec 2025
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT$100M6.4%Mar 2026
Envela Corporation ELA$98M104%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

$95M
$122M
$100M
$109M
$111M
$120M
$98M
$110M
$114M
$124M
$97M
$105M
$100M
$120M
$94M
$109M
$110M
$124M
$100M

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

$1.3B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$1.4B
$1.2B
$848M
$878M
$1.1B
$827M
$797M
$856M
$1.0B
$796M

Envela Corporation · ELA

$38M
$44M
$47M
$43M
$45M
$47M
$50M
$51M
$37M
$37M
$40M
$45M
$47M
$48M
$48M
$55M
$57M
$80M
$98M

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV

$192M
$202M
$221M
$215M
$212M
$171M
$158M
$133M
$107M

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

$158M
$188M
$170M
$175M
$176M
$190M
$199M
$203M
$187M
$197M
$234M
$223M
$202M
$223M
$243M
$588M
$574M
$647M
$618M

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

$174M
$218M
$206M
$163M
$183M
$211M
$187M
$145M
$160M
$188M
$171M
$134M
$159M
$181M
$181M
$132M
$162M
$186M
$192M
$142M

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

$1.8B
$1.5B
$2.8B
$1.8B
$1.8B
$1.6B
$2.7B
$1.7B
$1.6B
$1.4B
$3.2B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.3B
$2.8B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.4B
$2.3B
$1.6B

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

$1.6B
$1.5B
$2.1B
$1.4B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.6B
$2.1B
$1.5B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$2.2B
$1.6B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$2.5B
$1.9B
$1.9B

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

$119M
$145M
$147M
$154M
$143M
$160M
$142M
$131M
$133M
$143M
$144M
$145M
$148M
$164M
$160M
$165M
$174M
$194M
$190M

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

18%
17%
-1.6%
-2.0%
0.9%
2.7%
3.3%
-1.0%
-4.6%
-12%
-3.2%
-3.1%
3.8%
10%
3.3%
6.4%

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

19%
4.6%
-12%
-11%
-9.6%
1.1%
-36%
-29%
-25%
-32%
-6.0%
-2.5%
-4.0%
-3.8%

Envela Corporation · ELA

26%
18%
6.8%
6.4%
19%
-18%
-21%
-20%
-12%
27%
30%
20%
22%
21%
67%
104%

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV

73%
15%
6.4%
-4.1%
-20%
-25%
-22%
-32%

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

8.0%
11%
1.1%
17%
16%
6.3%
3.7%
18%
9.9%
8.0%
13%
3.9%
164%
184%
190%
154%

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

5.2%
-3.2%
-9.2%
-11%
-13%
-11%
-8.6%
-7.6%
-0.6%
-3.7%
5.9%
-1.5%
1.9%
2.8%
6.1%
7.6%

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

-1.9%
2.9%
-5.2%
-9.3%
-8.0%
-12%
19%
-9.4%
-7.6%
-3.1%
-11%
2.1%
3.0%
3.2%
-17%
0.8%

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

0.6%
1.8%
5.0%
-0.3%
38%
5.4%
-6.9%
5.3%
7.0%
8.3%
13%
14%
21%
8.9%

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

47%
20%
10%
-3.4%
-15%
-7.0%
-11%
1.4%
11%
11%
15%
11%
14%
18%
18%
19%
06 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Tapestry, Inc. has the highest OPM among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at 19.8%. Envela Corporation is next at 11.4%. The RealReal, Inc. has the highest Margin change at +6.8 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 8 of 9 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Tapestry, Inc. leads opm at 19.8%; The RealReal, Inc. leads margin change at +6.8 percentage points.

LeaderTapestry, Inc. · 19.8%
Gap73.7% versus #2 · Envela Corporation
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage8/9 companies · 152 observations

Investor read: Tapestry, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Margin changefastest expanders
1The RealReal, Inc. REAL+6.8 pp
2Envela Corporation ELA+4.9 pp
3Movado Group, Inc. MOV+4.7 pp
5Tapestry, Inc. TPR+2.5 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
8/9 level · 8/9 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Tapestry, Inc. TPR20%+2.5 ppJun 2026
Envela Corporation ELA11%+4.9 ppMar 2026
Movado Group, Inc. MOV4.9%+4.7 ppJun 2026
Signet Jewelers Limited SIG2.4%−0.7 ppJun 2026
The RealReal, Inc. REAL-1.2%+6.8 ppMar 2026
Capri Holdings Limited CPRI-3.4%+3.5 ppMar 2026
LuxExperience B.V. LUXE-4.8%−2.6 ppMar 2026
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT-8.9%−5.1 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

10%
11%
5.3%
5.2%
5.7%
5.1%
-0.1%
1.2%
1.8%
1.0%
0.9%
1.1%
-1.1%
2.0%
-3.8%
-1.1%
-0.6%
0.0%
-8.9%

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

15%
21%
8.0%
17%
18%
-3.0%
6.5%
8.5%
2.9%
1.3%
-0.7%
2.4%
-6.9%
2.0%
-1.4%
4.5%
-3.4%

Envela Corporation · ELA

7.1%
6.4%
6.0%
9.4%
7.7%
7.8%
6.3%
4.0%
5.3%
4.3%
5.9%
4.2%
4.3%
3.9%
6.5%
5.9%
7.3%
9.4%
11%

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

-2.3%
4.9%
-1.2%
0.7%
-0.5%
1.8%
-3.2%
-1.3%
-7.2%
-2.4%
-0.9%
-0.7%
-15%
-1.1%
-2.2%
102%
-14%
-1.6%
-4.8%

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

14%
19%
19%
16%
17%
18%
14%
7.5%
6.0%
11%
7.9%
1.6%
1.9%
3.3%
5.1%
0.2%
2.5%
6.3%
7.2%
4.9%

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

13%
7.0%
14%
0.0%
11%
3.1%
14%
6.1%
5.6%
1.0%
13%
3.3%
-6.8%
0.7%
24%
3.1%
0.2%
1.7%
14%
2.4%

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

16%
21%
22%
12%
16%
17%
15%
17%
23%
16%
17%
19%
25%
17%
17%
21%
29%
22%
20%

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

-43%
-32%
-37%
-33%
-32%
-24%
-58%
-31%
-17%
-15%
-13%
-13%
-9.9%
-3.1%
-8.0%
-6.0%
-4.3%
3.2%
-1.2%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

−8.2 pp
−4.7 pp
−5.5 pp
−5.4 pp
−4.0 pp
−3.9 pp
−4.1 pp
+1.0 pp
−0.1 pp
−2.9 pp
+1.0 pp
−4.7 pp
−2.2 pp
+0.5 pp
−2.0 pp
−5.1 pp

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

−12.6 pp
+2.0 pp
−2.8 pp
−11.0 pp
−10.5 pp
−9.3 pp
+4.3 pp
−7.2 pp
−6.1 pp
−9.8 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.7 pp
+2.1 pp
+3.5 pp

Envela Corporation · ELA

+3.2 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.3 pp
−5.4 pp
−2.4 pp
−3.5 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.7 pp
+3.0 pp
+5.5 pp
+4.9 pp

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

+4.5 pp
+1.8 pp
−3.1 pp
−2.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−6.7 pp
−4.2 pp
+2.3 pp
+0.6 pp
−7.7 pp
+1.3 pp
−1.3 pp
+102.4 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.5 pp
−2.6 pp

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

+2.6 pp
−0.9 pp
−4.5 pp
−8.0 pp
−10.8 pp
−7.1 pp
−6.1 pp
−5.9 pp
−4.1 pp
−7.7 pp
−2.8 pp
−1.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+3.0 pp
+2.1 pp
+4.7 pp

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

−2.0 pp
−3.9 pp
−0.4 pp
+6.1 pp
−5.0 pp
−2.1 pp
−0.8 pp
−2.8 pp
−12.4 pp
−0.3 pp
+10.4 pp
−0.2 pp
+7.0 pp
+1.0 pp
−9.9 pp
−0.7 pp

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

−0.1 pp
−3.8 pp
+2.8 pp
+1.3 pp
+5.9 pp
+1.9 pp
+1.6 pp
+2.2 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+2.3 pp
+3.8 pp
+5.2 pp
+2.5 pp

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

+28.8 pp
+11.1 pp
+8.0 pp
−20.3 pp
+1.7 pp
+15.0 pp
+9.1 pp
+45.1 pp
+18.3 pp
+7.0 pp
+11.6 pp
+4.5 pp
+7.0 pp
+5.6 pp
+6.3 pp
+6.8 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Tapestry, Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at $1,528 million. LuxExperience B.V. is next at $457 million. Envela Corporation has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Net profit series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Tapestry, Inc. leads with $1,528 million of TTM profit, 234.4% above LuxExperience B.V.. Envela Corporation shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (162.5% uncapped) growth from a $21 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderTapestry, Inc. · $1,528 million
Gap234.4% versus #2 · LuxExperience B.V.
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage8/9 companies · 161 observations

Investor read: Tapestry, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Tapestry, Inc. TPR$1.5B
Profit growthfastest growers
Net profit · company comparison
8/9 level · 3/9 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Tapestry, Inc. TPR$348M69%Jun 2026
The RealReal, Inc. REAL$39M-37%Mar 2026
Signet Jewelers Limited SIG$32M-5.9%Jun 2026
Envela Corporation ELA$9M350%Mar 2026
Movado Group, Inc. MOV$7M600%Jun 2026
Capri Holdings Limited CPRI$1M850%Mar 2026
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT$-8M-133%Mar 2026
LuxExperience B.V. LUXE$-31M-350%Mar 2026
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited LANV$-177MDec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

$4M
$11M
$3M
$4M
$6M
$6M
$0M
$1M
$2M
$2M
$1M
$1M
$-1M
$3M
$-3M
$-1M
$-1M
$-1M
$-8M

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

$200M
$323M
$81M
$203M
$224M
$-33M
$48M
$105M
$100M
$5M
$42M
$6M
$-579M
$56M
$-34M
$57M
$1M

Envela Corporation · ELA

$3M
$3M
$3M
$4M
$3M
$3M
$3M
$2M
$2M
$1M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$3M
$3M
$6M
$9M

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV

$-8M
$-69M
$-171M
$-72M
$-74M
$-69M
$-120M
$-87M
$-177M

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

$-7M
$2M
$-4M
$2M
$-4M
$0M
$-5M
$-5M
$-12M
$-6M
$-3M
$-4M
$-24M
$-5M
$-5M
$586M
$-85M
$-13M
$-31M

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

$19M
$32M
$32M
$19M
$24M
$30M
$23M
$9M
$8M
$18M
$12M
$2M
$4M
$5M
$8M
$1M
$3M
$10M
$13M
$7M

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

$225M
$93M
$314M
$-84M
$145M
$38M
$277M
$97M
$75M
$12M
$193M
$52M
$-99M
$7M
$850M
$34M
$-9M
$20M
$250M
$32M

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

$200M
$227M
$318M
$123M
$189M
$195M
$187M
$224M
$322M
$139M
$159M
$187M
$310M
$203M
$-517M
$275M
$561M
$344M
$348M

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

$-57M
$-52M
$-57M
$-53M
$-47M
$-39M
$-83M
$-41M
$-23M
$-22M
$-31M
$-17M
$-18M
$-68M
$62M
$-11M
$-54M
$-39M
$39M

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

-50%
50%
-45%
-100%
-75%
-67%
-67%
0.0%
-150%
50%
-400%
-200%
-133%

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

-63%
1.5%
-31%
-141%
-76%
-53%
-13%
-94%
-679%
1,020%
-181%
850%

Envela Corporation · ELA

100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-50%
-33%
-67%
-33%
0.0%
0.0%
100%
0.0%
50%
50%
200%
350%

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

-100%
-350%

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

26%
-6.3%
-28%
-53%
-67%
-40%
-48%
-78%
-50%
-72%
-33%
-50%
-25%
100%
63%
600%

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

-36%
-59%
-12%
-48%
-68%
-30%
-46%
-232%
-42%
340%
-35%
186%
-71%
-5.9%

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

-5.5%
-14%
52%
19%
65%
-15%
-17%
-3.7%
46%
-425%
47%
81%
69%

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

-37%
08 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Tapestry, Inc. has the highest ROCE among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at 37.3%. Envela Corporation is next at 14.6%. Envela Corporation has the highest ROCE change at +9.9 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 9 of 9 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Tapestry, Inc. leads ROCE at 37.3%, 22.7 percentage points above Envela Corporation. Envela Corporation has the strongest latest improvement at +9.9 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderTapestry, Inc. · 37.3%
Gap155.5% versus #2 · Envela Corporation
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage9/9 companies · 167 observations

Investor read: Tapestry, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Envela Corporation ELA+9.9 pp
2Tapestry, Inc. TPR+9.4 pp
3The RealReal, Inc. REAL+4.9 pp
4Movado Group, Inc. MOV+1.1 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
9/9 level · 9/9 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Tapestry, Inc. TPR37%+9.4 ppJun 2026
Envela Corporation ELA15%+9.9 ppMar 2026
Movado Group, Inc. MOV1.1%+1.1 ppJun 2026
Signet Jewelers Limited SIG0.9%−0.3 ppJun 2026
Capri Holdings Limited CPRI-0.9%+0.4 ppMar 2026
The RealReal, Inc. REAL-1.5%+4.9 ppMar 2026
LuxExperience B.V. LUXE-3.2%−2.0 ppMar 2026
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT-6.2%−4.4 ppMar 2026
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited LANV-144%−127.0 ppDec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

12%
15%
7.9%
6.7%
4.3%
3.9%
-0.1%
1.6%
1.1%
0.6%
0.4%
1.1%
-0.5%
1.2%
-1.8%
-0.7%
-0.4%
0.0%
-6.2%

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

3.2%
5.5%
2.0%
3.8%
4.2%
-0.7%
1.3%
2.1%
0.7%
0.2%
-0.1%
0.5%
-1.3%
0.4%
-0.3%
1.4%
-0.9%

Envela Corporation · ELA

7.2%
6.7%
6.5%
8.6%
6.8%
6.6%
5.4%
3.5%
3.2%
2.5%
3.6%
2.9%
3.1%
2.9%
4.7%
4.8%
5.8%
11%
15%

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV

0.0%
0.0%
-15%
-15%
-17%
-17%
-6.9%
-6.9%
-6.9%
-6.9%
-7.2%
-7.2%
-17%
-17%
-17%
-17%
-144%
-144%

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

-1.0%
2.5%
-0.5%
0.3%
-0.2%
0.8%
-1.4%
-0.6%
-2.8%
-1.0%
-0.4%
-0.3%
-6.3%
-0.5%
-1.2%
59%
-8.6%
-1.1%
-3.2%

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

7.1%
6.4%
4.3%
5.2%
6.3%
4.2%
1.8%
1.6%
3.3%
2.1%
0.3%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
0.0%
0.6%
1.9%
2.2%
1.1%

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

2.3%
9.3%
0.0%
4.3%
1.1%
8.3%
2.4%
2.1%
0.3%
9.0%
1.1%
-2.4%
0.2%
15%
1.2%
0.1%
0.6%
8.0%
0.9%

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

18%
20%
22%
21%
20%
20%
20%
10%
10%
11%
11%
24%
24%
28%
32%
34%
36%
37%

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

-9.3%
-9.0%
-9.1%
-9.2%
-8.7%
-7.8%
-19%
-11%
-6.3%
-6.3%
-6.3%
-7.7%
-6.4%
-2.4%
-6.4%
-5.7%
-4.7%
3.9%
-1.5%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

−7.5 pp
−11.2 pp
−8.0 pp
−5.1 pp
−3.2 pp
−3.3 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
−1.6 pp
+0.6 pp
−2.2 pp
−1.8 pp
+0.1 pp
−1.2 pp
−4.4 pp

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

+0.6 pp
−1.3 pp
−2.7 pp
−2.5 pp
−2.1 pp
+0.9 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.6 pp
−2.0 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.4 pp

Envela Corporation · ELA

−0.4 pp
−0.1 pp
−1.1 pp
−5.1 pp
−3.6 pp
−4.1 pp
−1.8 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.9 pp
+2.7 pp
+7.7 pp
+9.9 pp

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV

−16.7 pp
−16.7 pp
+8.3 pp
+8.3 pp
+9.8 pp
+9.8 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−9.8 pp
−9.8 pp
−9.7 pp
−9.7 pp
−127.0 pp
−127.0 pp

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

+0.8 pp
−1.7 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.9 pp
−2.6 pp
−1.8 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.3 pp
−3.5 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.8 pp
+59.4 pp
−2.3 pp
−0.6 pp
−2.0 pp

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

−0.8 pp
−2.2 pp
−2.5 pp
−3.6 pp
−3.0 pp
−2.1 pp
−1.5 pp
−1.1 pp
−2.3 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.1 pp

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

−1.2 pp
−1.0 pp
+2.4 pp
−2.2 pp
−0.8 pp
+0.7 pp
−1.3 pp
−4.5 pp
−0.1 pp
+6.2 pp
+0.1 pp
+2.5 pp
+0.4 pp
−7.2 pp
−0.3 pp

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

+2.0 pp
−1.9 pp
−0.8 pp
−10.0 pp
−9.0 pp
−9.5 pp
+14.2 pp
+13.9 pp
+17.1 pp
+21.2 pp
+9.9 pp
+12.1 pp
+9.4 pp

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

+0.6 pp
+1.2 pp
−10.2 pp
−1.5 pp
+2.4 pp
+1.5 pp
+13.0 pp
+3.0 pp
−0.1 pp
+3.9 pp
−0.1 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.7 pp
+6.3 pp
+4.9 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Signet Jewelers Limited has the lowest PEG among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at 0.04×. Movado Group, Inc. is next at 0.45×. The same company also holds the lowest P/E, at 1.2×. 3 of 9 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Signet Jewelers Limited has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.04×, 91.1% below Movado Group, Inc.. Only 3 of 9 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderSignet Jewelers Limited · 0.04×
Gap91.1% versus #2 · Movado Group, Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/9 companies · 9 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
Valuation · company comparison
3/9 level · 7/9 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
Envela Corporation ELA0.520.6Mar 2026
Movado Group, Inc. MOV0.519.5Jun 2026
Signet Jewelers Limited SIG0.01.2Jun 2026
Tapestry, Inc. TPR19.3Jun 2026
Capri Holdings Limited CPRI15.2Mar 2026
LuxExperience B.V. LUXE1.9Mar 2026
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT70.0Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

Envela Corporation · ELA

0.3
2.3
1.3
0.5

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

1.8
0.5

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

0.0
0.1
0.0

P/E · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

1,945.7
90.3
514.6
27.9
27.3
28.7
30.1
35.3
36.9
93.0
49.8
37.0
71.3
70.0

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

19.6
17.1
9.5
7.7
6.8
10.2
10.3
28.2
15.2

Envela Corporation · ELA

12.6
11.0
11.7
15.5
11.0
9.1
11.4
15.0
11.0
18.0
19.3
18.7
22.8
27.6
22.3
18.6
19.5
23.9
20.6

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

1.2
1.9
1.8
1.9

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

8.7
9.7
8.4
7.6
7.4
9.0
6.9
9.4
11.5
15.1
16.4
19.3
21.0
23.6
17.8
20.4
18.8
19.5
19.5

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

0.6
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.8
1.1
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.7
2.3
8.5
9.0
6.7
2.5
3.0
1.3
1.2

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

12.8
13.4
11.0
9.1
8.3
11.3
10.6
9.1
12.4
12.1
13.8
19.0
16.9
83.2
51.5
42.4
19.3
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Luxury Goods comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 1 of the 9 companies reports on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so its rank is marked stale. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 1 company has an older fundamental reporting date than the sector’s freshest reporters; its rank carries a stale marker.
11 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 9 Luxury Goods companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-09-16. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-09-16 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Luxury Goods company comparison FAQs

These 22 answers restate the Luxury Goods comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 9 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-09-16. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Luxury Goods sector outperforming S&P 500?

Luxury Goods has underperformed S&P 500 by 6.6% over 52 weeks and 14.9% over 13 weeks. 2 of 9 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 3 of 9 beat the sector itself.

Which Luxury Goods company is largest by revenue?

Tapestry, Inc. leads with revenue of $8,005 million, based on 8 of 9 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Which Luxury Goods company is growing fastest?

LuxExperience B.V. has the fastest current revenue growth at 100%, across 8 of 9 comparable companies.

Which Luxury Goods company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Movado Group, Inc. ranks first at 70/100 with 79.3% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Luxury Goods company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Signet Jewelers Limited has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.04, among 3 of 9 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Luxury Goods comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Which Luxury Goods company is the biggest?

Tapestry, Inc. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $8,005 million, ahead of Signet Jewelers Limited at $6,826 million. That covers 8 of 9 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.

Which Luxury Goods company has the best profit margins?

Tapestry, Inc. has the highest operating margin at 19.8%, from 8 of 9 comparable companies. The RealReal, Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +6.8 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Luxury Goods company makes the most profit?

Tapestry, Inc. earns the most, at $1,528 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 8 of 9 comparable companies. Envela Corporation has the fastest profit growth at the ≥100% scoring cap, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Luxury Goods company earns the highest return on capital?

Tapestry, Inc. leads on return on capital employed at 37.3%, across 9 of 9 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Luxury Goods stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Signet Jewelers Limited screens cheapest at 0.04×. Only 3 of 9 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Luxury Goods sector beating the market?

Luxury Goods has underperformed S&P 500 by 6.6% over the last 52 weeks and 14.9% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 2 of 9 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Luxury Goods stock has the strongest price momentum?

Movado Group, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Luxury Goods company scores highest for research priority?

Movado Group, Inc. scores 70 out of 100 with 79.3% evidence confidence, from 24.5 points on growth and earnings, 14 on capital efficiency, 14.5 on valuation and 17 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Luxury Goods companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 9 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Luxury Goods sector?

The 9 Luxury Goods companies on this page carry $32,829 million of combined market value. Tapestry, Inc. is the largest at $23,516 million, about 72% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-09-16.

What is the Luxury Goods sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 9 Luxury Goods companies on this page is 19.3×, measured on the 7 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-09-16.

How is the Luxury Goods sector performing?

2 of the 9 covered Luxury Goods companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 6.6% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-09-16.

How many Luxury Goods stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 9 listed Luxury Goods companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI