Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-17
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Packaging - BOPP Stocks in India

Packaging - BOPP: Uflex Ltd owns the largest revenue base; Cosmo First Ltd has the fastest current growth.

The 5 Packaging - BOPP companies listed in India are Uflex Ltd (₹4.7K Cr, the largest), Polyplex Corporation Ltd, Jindal Poly Films Ltd and 2 more. 4 of 5 covered companies beat NIFTY 500 on relative strength. Readings are as of 17 Sep 2026.

All 5 Packaging - BOPP Stocks in India (Sep 2026) — ranked by 4-Factor score

  1. 1Cosmo First Ltd₹2.3K Cr64.2/100Mixed-positive evidence · strongest on revenue growth and relative strength versus sector
  2. 2Uflex Ltd₹4.7K Cr58.6/100Mixed-positive evidence · strongest on PEG and profit growth
  3. 3Nahar Polyfilms Ltd₹570 Cr50.4/100Mixed-positive evidence · strongest on ROCE improvement and profit growth
  4. 4Polyplex Corporation Ltd₹3.6K Cr45.4/100Mixed-negative evidence · strongest on margin improvement and relative strength versus the benchmark
  5. 5Jindal Poly Films Ltd₹2.9K Cr21.6/100Adverse evidence

Ranked by the 4-Factor Sector Score (growth & earnings 35, capital efficiency 25, valuation 20, relative strength 20). Prices as of 11 Sep 2026. Not investment advice.

01 · the index people search for

Nifty Packaging - BOPP Index — Constituents & Performance

All 5 listed Indian Packaging - BOPP companies are named here, largest first — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Packaging - BOPP index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies and carries its own as-of date. One large constituent cannot set the reading.

  1. Uflex Ltd₹4.7K Cr
  2. Polyplex Corporation Ltd₹3.6K Cr
  3. Jindal Poly Films Ltd₹2.9K Cr
  4. Cosmo First Ltd₹2.3K Cr
  5. Nahar Polyfilms Ltd₹570 Cr
02 · the sector itself · before any single company

How has Packaging - BOPP moved against NIFTY 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 6% ahead of NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies fell 0% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of NIFTY 500 on a rolling three-month view for 5 weeks running.

BREAKING OUT · ahead 5w✓Moving with the index3 of 5 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS ↑5w · 4/5 >200d (+0) · 3/5 lead (+0) · EPS 4/5↑

20020262025202420232022 210303 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100207Dec 23Jun 24Dec 24Jun 25Dec 25Jun 26Sep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 54, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 45, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 88, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 116, against 100 at the start · up 39.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 166, against 100 at the start · up 200.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 207, against 100 at the start · up 157.2% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 161, against 100 at the start · up 63.8% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 117, against 100 at the start · down 5.6% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 87, against 100 at the start · down 32.6% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · up 17.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 184, against 100 at the start · up 20.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two184No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
20020262025202420232022 210303 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100207Jun 24Jun 25Jun 26Sep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 54, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 45, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 88, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 116, against 100 at the start · up 39.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 166, against 100 at the start · up 200.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 207, against 100 at the start · up 157.2% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 161, against 100 at the start · up 63.8% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 117, against 100 at the start · down 5.6% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 87, against 100 at the start · down 32.6% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · up 17.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 184, against 100 at the start · up 20.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two184No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
Packaging - BOPP, equal-weighted, based at 200 NIFTY 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 5 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

03 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Packaging - BOPP outperforming NIFTY 500?

Packaging - BOPP has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 3.5% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 17.9%. 4 of 5 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Cosmo First Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +1.3%. Readings are as of 2026-08-22.

+17.9%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
+3.5%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
4/5Stocks leading NIFTY 500
1/5Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: 24.6 as of 2026-08-22 · LEADERS · rising.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Packaging - BOPP has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 3.5% over 52 weeks and 17.9% over 13 weeks. 4 of 5 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 5 beat the sector itself. Uflex Ltd leads with revenue of ₹16,866 crore, based on 5 of 5 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Companies
5
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹14.1K Cr
Uflex Ltd
Revenue growing
3/5
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
4/5
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 5
04 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Cosmo First Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 87% evidence confidence.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Cosmo First LtdCOSMOFIRST 64.2/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence BREAKING OUT 24.3/35 Revenue 33.2% · PAT 15.1% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence 14.6/25 ROCE 11.2% · OPM 12% 95% evidence 8.1/20 P/E 13.4× · PEG — 50% evidence 17.2/20 RS sector 1.3% · RS bench 16% · 1Y -9.2%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.3 + 14.6 + 8.1 + 17.2 = 64.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Uflex LtdUFLEX 58.6/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence BREAKING OUT 24.3/35 Revenue 10.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5 pp 100% evidence 9.8/25 ROCE 7% · OPM 17% 100% evidence 16.5/20 P/E 6.8× · PEG 0.42 65% evidence 8.0/20 RS sector -22% · RS bench 38% · 1Y 18.6%9 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 24.3 + 9.8 + 16.5 + 8 = 58.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Nahar Polyfilms LtdNAHARPOLY 50.4/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence ASLEEP 20.1/35 Revenue -4.2% · PAT 26.3% · OPM change -5 pp 95% evidence 13.6/25 ROCE 10.6% · OPM 9% 95% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 7.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.9/20 RS sector -6.2% · RS bench -8.1% · 1Y -22.1%0 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.1 + 13.6 + 10.8 + 5.9 = 50.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Polyplex Corporation LtdPOLYPLEX 45.4/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence BREAKING OUT 18.0/35 Revenue 9.5% · PAT 36.5% · OPM change 13 pp 71% evidence 9.4/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 13% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 22.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.7/20 RS sector -11.9% · RS bench 22% · 1Y 10%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 9.4 + 9.3 + 8.7 = 45.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Jindal Poly Films LtdJINDALPOLY 21.6/100Adverse evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 2.8/35 Revenue -49.8% · PAT -80% · OPM change -0.2 pp 95% evidence 3.0/25 ROCE -2% · OPM 1.4% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 50.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.3/20 RS sector -3.8% · RS bench 9.9% · 1Y 15.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 2.8 + 3 + 8.5 + 7.3 = 21.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
05 · what price has already done

Market action

Uflex Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Packaging - BOPP at +18.6%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +38%. 4 of 5 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-09-11.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

06 · the story behind the numbers

Packaging - BOPP — the story behind the numbers

This is the written read behind the Packaging - BOPP figures above — what is actually happening in the sector, in words, with the evidence each claim rests on. It is dated 25 Jul 2026. 4 themes are live here.

The Packaging - BOPP sector shows signs of operational efficiency gains despite modest top-line expansion. NAHARPOLY reported Q4 FY26 revenue of ₹167.68 Cr, up 7.05% YoY. Operating profit jumped 32.92% YoY to ₹31.21 Cr, driving EBITDA margins to 18.61%, a 360 bps expansion from 14.99% last year. Profit After Tax surged 44.92% YoY to ₹20.50 Cr.

How old this read is: This read comes from our Packaging - BOPP sector brief dated 25 Jul 2026 — 54 days old. The numbers above it are newer than the words here.

What is live in this sector right now

Live themeSeverityEvidence on file
Global geopolitical uncertainties and conflicts are impacting world economies and trade, with global growth projected to drop.Named for NAHARPOLYmediumCompany hopeful FTAs with EU, US, Canada will benefit Indian Economy to grow at much faster rate.
Polypropylene costs are volatile due to crude oil price changes, directly affecting production costs and profit margins.Named for NAHARPOLYmediumNo further detail is on file for this theme.
Logistics expenses are cited as a factor that could pose margin risks if cost escalation occurs without pricing power.Named for NAHARPOLYlowNo further detail is on file for this theme.
Changes in regulatory frameworks are identified as a key watchpoint for investors alongside competitive pressure.Named for NAHARPOLYlowNo further detail is on file for this theme.

Sources: our Packaging - BOPP sector brief, 25 Jul 2026.

07 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Uflex Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 5 Packaging - BOPP companies compared here, at ₹16,866 crore. Polyplex Corporation Ltd is next at ₹7,601 crore. Cosmo First Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at 33.2%, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Uflex Ltd is the scale leader at ₹16,866 crore, 121.9% ahead of Polyplex Corporation Ltd. Cosmo First Ltd's growth is 33.2% from a ₹4,005 crore base, with 15 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderUflex Ltd · ₹16,866 crore
Gap121.9% versus #2 · Polyplex Corporation Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 80 observations

Investor read: Uflex Ltd is the scale benchmark; Cosmo First Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Uflex Ltd's growth falls below Cosmo First Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Uflex Ltd UFLEX₹16.9K Cr
2Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX₹7.6K Cr
3Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified₹4.0K Cr
4Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY₹2.3K Cr
5Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY₹667 Cr
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified33%
2Uflex Ltd UFLEX10%
3Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX9.5%
4Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY-4.2%
5Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY-50%
Revenue · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Uflex Ltd UFLEX₹5.4K Cr38%Jun 2026
Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX₹2.3K Cr30%Jun 2026
Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified₹1.2K Cr46%Jun 2026
Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY₹696 Cr-24%Jun 2026
Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY₹160 Cr-19%Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
₹730 Cr
₹715 Cr
₹658 Cr
₹664 Cr
₹625 Cr
₹641 Cr
₹690 Cr
₹759 Cr
₹701 Cr
₹746 Cr
₹800 Cr
₹919 Cr
₹899 Cr
₹1.0K Cr
₹1.2K Cr

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

—
—
—
—
—
₹887 Cr
₹810 Cr
₹832 Cr
₹1.0K Cr
₹984 Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹914 Cr
₹410 Cr
₹558 Cr
₹675 Cr
₹696 Cr

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

—
—
—
—
—
₹160 Cr
₹149 Cr
₹156 Cr
₹137 Cr
₹154 Cr
₹153 Cr
₹168 Cr
₹169 Cr
₹173 Cr
₹157 Cr
₹197 Cr
₹172 Cr
₹167 Cr
₹168 Cr
₹160 Cr

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

—
—
—
—
—
₹1.9K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.6K Cr
₹1.6K Cr
₹1.5K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.8K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.9K Cr
₹2.3K Cr

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

₹3.0K Cr
₹3.5K Cr
₹4.0K Cr
₹4.0K Cr
₹3.8K Cr
₹3.5K Cr
₹3.4K Cr
₹3.3K Cr
₹3.4K Cr
₹3.3K Cr
₹3.4K Cr
₹3.7K Cr
₹3.8K Cr
₹3.7K Cr
₹3.8K Cr
₹3.9K Cr
₹3.8K Cr
₹3.6K Cr
₹4.1K Cr
₹5.4K Cr

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-14%
-10%
4.9%
14%
12%
16%
16%
21%
28%
37%
46%

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
11%
33%
48%
9.8%
21%
32%
-26%
-64%
-53%
-52%
-24%

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-3.8%
2.7%
7.7%
23%
12%
2.6%
17%
1.8%
-3.5%
7.0%
-19%

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-20%
0.7%
8.0%
11%
15%
3.6%
3.1%
3.2%
-2.3%
7.5%
30%

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

—
—
—
47%
27%
0.3%
-15%
-19%
-12%
-5.0%
1.4%
12%
14%
13%
11%
6.8%
-0.0%
-3.3%
6.4%
38%
08 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Uflex Ltd has the highest OPM among the 5 Packaging - BOPP companies compared here, at 17%. Polyplex Corporation Ltd is next at 13%. Polyplex Corporation Ltd has the highest Margin change at +13 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Uflex Ltd leads opm at 17%; Polyplex Corporation Ltd leads margin change at +13 percentage points.

LeaderUflex Ltd · 17%
Gap30.8% versus #2 · Polyplex Corporation Ltd
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 100 observations

Investor read: Uflex Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Uflex Ltd UFLEX17%
2Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX13%
3Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified12%
4Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY9.0%
5Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY1.4%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX+13.0 pp
2Uflex Ltd UFLEX+5.0 pp
3Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified+1.0 pp
4Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY−0.2 pp
5Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY−5.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Uflex Ltd UFLEX17%+5.0 ppJun 2026
Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX13%+13.0 ppJun 2026
Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified12%+1.0 ppJun 2026
Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY9.0%−5.0 ppJun 2026
Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY1.4%−0.2 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

19%
19%
18%
17%
15%
9.0%
9.0%
5.0%
9.0%
7.0%
7.0%
10%
11%
9.0%
9.0%
11%
11%
8.0%
12%
12%

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

22%
23%
26%
23%
3.1%
-9.0%
3.1%
1.5%
2.4%
-3.3%
-0.7%
2.9%
6.0%
6.0%
4.0%
1.6%
2.7%
-11%
-83%
1.4%

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

21%
25%
29%
19%
8.2%
7.0%
8.0%
2.2%
12%
-0.2%
1.1%
9.0%
13%
9.0%
15%
14%
16%
12%
19%
9.0%

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

17%
20%
20%
18%
12%
6.0%
3.3%
3.9%
8.0%
3.3%
6.0%
10%
11%
7.0%
3.7%
0.0%
6.0%
6.0%
4.7%
13%

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

14%
18%
17%
18%
11%
8.0%
11%
9.0%
11%
10%
11%
11%
10%
12%
11%
12%
10%
12%
14%
17%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

+2.6 pp
+2.1 pp
+0.9 pp
−2.2 pp
−4.5 pp
−10.2 pp
−8.7 pp
−12.0 pp
−5.5 pp
−2.0 pp
−2.0 pp
+5.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+1.0 pp

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

−9.1 pp
−5.3 pp
+5.1 pp
−1.0 pp
−18.9 pp
−32.1 pp
−23.2 pp
−21.9 pp
−0.7 pp
+5.7 pp
−3.8 pp
+1.4 pp
+3.6 pp
+9.3 pp
+4.7 pp
−1.3 pp
−3.3 pp
−17.0 pp
−87.0 pp
−0.2 pp

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

+1.1 pp
+1.7 pp
+7.7 pp
−0.8 pp
−12.7 pp
−18.3 pp
−20.6 pp
−17.0 pp
+3.8 pp
−7.2 pp
−6.9 pp
+6.8 pp
+1.0 pp
+9.2 pp
+13.9 pp
+5.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+4.0 pp
−5.0 pp

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

+1.9 pp
−6.7 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.3 pp
−5.1 pp
−13.9 pp
−16.8 pp
−13.8 pp
−3.6 pp
−2.7 pp
+2.7 pp
+6.1 pp
+3.0 pp
+3.7 pp
−2.3 pp
−10.0 pp
−5.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+13.0 pp

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

−7.2 pp
−2.0 pp
−3.1 pp
−0.4 pp
−2.8 pp
−9.6 pp
−5.8 pp
−8.6 pp
+0.1 pp
+2.0 pp
0.0 pp
+2.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+5.0 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Uflex Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 5 Packaging - BOPP companies compared here, at ₹682 crore. Polyplex Corporation Ltd is next at ₹273 crore. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at the 100% top of the scoring scale. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Uflex Ltd leads with ₹682 crore of TTM profit, 149.8% above Polyplex Corporation Ltd. Uflex Ltd shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (128.1% uncapped) growth from a ₹682 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderUflex Ltd · ₹682 crore
Gap149.8% versus #2 · Polyplex Corporation Ltd
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 80 observations

Investor read: Uflex Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Uflex Ltd UFLEX₹682 Cr
2Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX₹273 Cr
3Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified₹168 Cr
4Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY₹72 Cr
5Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY₹-991 Cr
Profit growthfastest growers
1Uflex Ltd UFLEX100%
2Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY26%
3Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified15%
4Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY-80%
Net profit · company comparison
5/5 level · 4/5 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Uflex Ltd UFLEX₹423 Cr629%Jun 2026
Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX₹171 Cr-71%Jun 2026
Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY₹107 Cr197%Jun 2026
Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified₹54 Cr26%Jun 2026
Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY₹12 Cr-33%Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
₹46 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹14 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹46 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹43 Cr
₹47 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹54 Cr

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

—
—
—
—
—
₹-97 Cr
₹-385 Cr
₹98 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹-19 Cr
₹-19 Cr
₹168 Cr
₹117 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹-179 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹-13 Cr
₹-97 Cr
₹-988 Cr
₹107 Cr

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

—
—
—
—
—
₹1 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹-5 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹14 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹12 Cr

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

—
—
—
—
—
₹84 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹-10 Cr
₹48 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹97 Cr
₹164 Cr
₹105 Cr
₹-9 Cr
₹-60 Cr
₹34 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹38 Cr
₹171 Cr

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

₹171 Cr
₹313 Cr
₹350 Cr
₹374 Cr
₹191 Cr
₹-85 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹-416 Cr
₹63 Cr
₹-67 Cr
₹-271 Cr
₹-98 Cr
₹-65 Cr
₹137 Cr
₹169 Cr
₹58 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹196 Cr
₹423 Cr

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-76%
-53%
121%
109%
173%
80%
39%
2.2%
0.0%
37%
26%

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
71%
875%
—
—
-79%
-111%
-2,525%
—
197%

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-600%
-75%
—
42%
—
1,300%
125%
24%
138%
43%
-33%

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-80%
55%
—
242%
518%
-129%
-162%
-79%
-71%
—
—

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

—
—
—
42%
12%
-127%
-100%
-211%
-67%
—
—
—
-203%
—
—
—
—
-74%
16%
629%
10 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Cosmo First Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 5 Packaging - BOPP companies compared here, at 11.2%. Nahar Polyfilms Ltd is next at 10.6%. Nahar Polyfilms Ltd has the highest ROCE change at +5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Cosmo First Ltd leads ROCE at 11.2%, 0.6 percentage points above Nahar Polyfilms Ltd. Nahar Polyfilms Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +5 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderCosmo First Ltd · 11.2%
Gap5.7% versus #2 · Nahar Polyfilms Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 30 observations

Investor read: Cosmo First Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified11%
2Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY11%
3Uflex Ltd UFLEX7.0%
4Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX0.9%
5Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY-2.0%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY+5.0 pp
2Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified+1.3 pp
3Uflex Ltd UFLEX−1.0 pp
4Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX−6.0 pp
5Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY−7.0 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change

Withheld from this chart: Polyplex Corporation Ltd (POLYPLEX) — its two data sources disagree by up to 207% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Jindal Poly Films Ltd (JINDALPOLY) — its two data sources disagree by up to 20% on reported income across 13 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified7.8%+1.3 ppJun 2026
Uflex Ltd UFLEX7.3%−1.0 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

27%
—
27%
—
24%
—
15%
—
6.3%
8.0%
3.9%
8.4%
5.5%
10%
6.5%
11%
7.0%
11%
7.8%
—

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

14%
—
16%
—
16%
—
12%
—
7.4%
2.2%
6.6%
2.6%
7.4%
3.8%
8.3%
9.2%
7.8%
8.5%
7.3%
—

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
−2.7 pp
—
−12.5 pp
—
−17.8 pp
—
−10.6 pp
—
−0.8 pp
+2.2 pp
+2.6 pp
+2.6 pp
+1.5 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.3 pp
—

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

—
—
—
—
+2.0 pp
—
−4.0 pp
—
−8.9 pp
—
−5.1 pp
—
0.0 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.7 pp
+6.6 pp
+0.4 pp
+4.7 pp
−1.0 pp
—
11 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Uflex Ltd has the lowest PEG among the 5 Packaging - BOPP companies compared here, at 0.42×. The same company also holds the lowest P/E, at 6.82×. 1 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026. Its PEG series carries 7 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Uflex Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.42×. Only 1 of 5 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderUflex Ltd · 0.42×
GapNot enough peers
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage1/5 companies · 7 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
1Uflex Ltd UFLEX0.4
P/Elowest P/E
1Uflex Ltd UFLEX6.8
2Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY7.9
3Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified13.4
4Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX22.9
5Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY50.2
Valuation · company comparison
1/5 level · 5/5 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
Uflex Ltd UFLEX0.49.4Jun 2026
Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX—68.7Jun 2026
Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY—24.4Jun 2026
Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified—13.1Jun 2026
Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY—7.9Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

—
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
0.7
0.4

P/E · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

10.0
7.9
8.5
6.6
5.9
5.5
5.0
7.8
11.2
14.4
16.7
33.2
25.4
24.1
13.3
22.4
15.3
12.0
10.7
13.1

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

4.8
5.1
5.3
3.8
3.3
2.4
1.9
14.3
14.0
—
—
42.2
70.5
24.6
18.1
16.1
28.7
24.4
—
—

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

8.9
9.2
16.8
8.1
8.0
6.9
7.9
14.0
37.1
36.0
50.3
53.5
37.8
31.1
14.2
18.1
12.4
9.7
7.5
7.9

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

12.0
12.7
13.4
12.3
9.7
7.5
6.8
11.8
23.0
46.4
64.9
72.6
38.2
26.6
18.1
18.4
15.9
12.2
11.8
68.7

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

4.3
4.3
4.2
3.6
4.3
3.2
2.6
5.1
25.2
23.9
—
45.7
22.1
24.6
13.5
16.5
17.0
15.2
11.3
9.4
12 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Packaging - BOPP comparison names 7 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 5 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 draws at least one figure from a second feed with too little overlap to cross-check. 2 have second-feed figures withheld because the two sources disagree.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 1 company draws at least one figure from a second data feed with too little overlapping history to cross-check against the primary source; it is marked unverified wherever that figure appears.
  • 2 companies are missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
  • Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
13 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 5 Packaging - BOPP companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-09-11. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-09-11 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing1 cross-checked · 2 unverified · 2 withheld, of 5 graded companies.
How a second data feed is admitted, and what happens when it disagrees

A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from.

14 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Packaging - BOPP company comparison FAQs

These 24 answers restate the Packaging - BOPP comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 5 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-09-11. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Packaging - BOPP sector outperforming NIFTY 500?

Packaging - BOPP has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 3.5% over 52 weeks and 17.9% over 13 weeks. 4 of 5 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 5 beat the sector itself.

Which Packaging - BOPP company is largest by revenue?

Uflex Ltd leads with revenue of ₹16,866 crore, based on 5 of 5 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Which Packaging - BOPP company is growing fastest?

Cosmo First Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 33.2%, across 5 of 5 comparable companies.

Which Packaging - BOPP company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Cosmo First Ltd ranks first at 64.2/100 with 87% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Packaging - BOPP company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Uflex Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.42, among 1 of 5 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Packaging - BOPP comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Is there a Nifty Packaging - BOPP index?

NSE India maintains Nifty indices for several broad sector categories — Nifty Bank, Nifty IT, Nifty Pharma and others — but not for every sub-sector grouping on this site. Whether or not an official Nifty index covers Packaging - BOPP, this page builds its own equal-weight basket of 5 listed Packaging - BOPP companies — one company, one vote, regardless of market value — so no single large company dominates the reading. Figures are as of Jun 2026.

Which are the best Packaging - BOPP stocks in India?

Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Cosmo First Ltd places first among 5 listed Packaging - BOPP companies, followed by Uflex Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.

How many Packaging - BOPP stocks are listed in India?

This comparison covers 5 listed Packaging - BOPP companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.

Which Packaging - BOPP company is the biggest?

Uflex Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹16,866 crore, ahead of Polyplex Corporation Ltd at ₹7,601 crore. That covers 5 of 5 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.

Which Packaging - BOPP company has the best profit margins?

Uflex Ltd has the highest operating margin at 17%, from 5 of 5 comparable companies. Polyplex Corporation Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +13 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Packaging - BOPP company makes the most profit?

Uflex Ltd earns the most, at ₹682 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 5 of 5 comparable companies. Uflex Ltd has the fastest profit growth at the ≥100% scoring cap, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Packaging - BOPP company earns the highest return on capital?

Cosmo First Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 11.2%, across 5 of 5 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Packaging - BOPP stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Uflex Ltd screens cheapest at 0.42×. Only 1 of 5 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Packaging - BOPP sector beating the market?

Packaging - BOPP has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 3.5% over the last 52 weeks and 17.9% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 4 of 5 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Packaging - BOPP stock has the strongest price momentum?

Uflex Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Packaging - BOPP company scores highest for research priority?

Cosmo First Ltd scores 64.2 out of 100 with 87% evidence confidence, from 24.3 points on growth and earnings, 14.6 on capital efficiency, 8.1 on valuation and 17.2 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Packaging - BOPP companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 5 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Packaging - BOPP sector?

The 5 Packaging - BOPP companies on this page carry ₹14,086 crore of combined market value. Uflex Ltd is the largest at ₹4,719 crore, about 34% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-09-17.

What is the Packaging - BOPP sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 5 Packaging - BOPP companies on this page is 13.4×, measured on the 5 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-09-17.

How is the Packaging - BOPP sector performing?

4 of the 5 covered Packaging - BOPP companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 3.5% ahead of NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-09-17.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

About

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI