Market cap is price times coins in circulation, from CoinGecko. The small words beside each coin are CoinGecko's own tags. A size ranking, not a pick.
What is AI crypto?
AI crypto coins are the coins CoinGecko tags as Artificial Intelligence (AI), AI Agents, AI Framework, AI Applications or DeFAI. Each coin sits in one theme only: the first, most specific one its tags match. We track 106 AI coins, 80 of them rated below.
Bottom line
lium ranks first for research priority in AI crypto at 67.8/100, and its native activity proof is incomplete. The theme's 13-week excess versus Bitcoin is -9.3% on 29% breadth, which is what decides whether that lead is isolated or broad. 4 of the 80 assets here carry enough native evidence to move past a price-led label.
These AI coins are part of the cryptocurrency universe this site tracks daily: the top 1,000 coins by market cap when the list was built, priced from exchange closes where we have a price we trust, and matched to protocol fees and revenue where a protocol publishes them.
The theme itself · before any single company
How has AI moved against Bitcoin?
The line below covers up to 5 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this theme is 3% ahead of Bitcoin. Protocol revenue across its protocols fell 76% on average over the last four reported quarters.
FADING · −7 in 4w⚠Moving with the index22 of 67 coins ahead of Bitcoin by 5% or more over three months
Not ahead of Bitcoin right now; 29/65 >200d (−13); 22 of 67 ahead of Bitcoin by 5% or more over three months (7 fewer than four weeks earlier).
AI, equal-weighted, based at 200Bitcoin, same base, same starttrailing 12-month protocol revenue risingfalling
AI, equal-weighted, based at 200Bitcoin, same base, same starttrailing 12-month protocol revenue risingfalling
AI, equal-weighted, based at 200Bitcoin, same base, same starttrailing 12-month protocol revenue risingfalling
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the gap between them tells the story: the theme line is an equal-weighted index of its 67 coins. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month protocol revenue, one bar per reported quarter, each member set to 100 at the start and the theme taking the middle value, so a price line pulling away from flat bars means the market is paying more for the same earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. The rules are fixed and the same everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while protocol revenue grew 20% or more. Hover or tap any point to read both values and the gap.
BTC LED market context
AI vs Bitcoin: Relative Strength & Breadth
AI crypto has outperformed Bitcoin by 13.1% over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of current members. Over 13 weeks the figure is -9.3%. 22 of 75 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Nillion leads Bitcoin-relative strength at +169.2%. Price readings are as of 2026-10-30.
-9.3%13 weeks vs Bitcoin
+13%52 weeks vs Bitcoin
22 of 75above their 200-day average
NILfurthest ahead of Bitcoin · +169%
Assets
80
canonical functional membership
Activity-covered
4/80
enough native evidence
Top score
67.8/100
lium
Calendar quarters
20
complete; missing stays missing
Global asset selection · top 20 shown
Showing 20 of 80 assets
00 · exact additive research priority
4-Factor Crypto Evidence Score
A within-theme research-priority score for the 80 assets in AI, out of 100. The four displayed point contributions add exactly to the total, and the market regime changes the action label, never the arithmetic. lium is highest at 67.8/100 on 50% evidence. It ranks research attention, not portfolio action.
lium leads the current research queue at 67.8/100 with 50% evidence.
4 of 80 assets have enough native activity evidence to move beyond a price-led label.
26 of the 106 AI coins are not rated this week: 26 report no traded volume. They are listed in full below the ranking.
Missing native metrics are not scored as zero and are not silently reweighted. They pull only the affected factor toward neutral and lower its visible evidence percentage. An asset with nothing measurable at all is not scored at 50 either: it is listed as not rated.
1. lium · SN51
67.8/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 34.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.1 = 67.8
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +117 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +28 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
8.1/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.6M · price swings: 70.1% a year
100% evidence
2. Chainlink · LINK
67.1/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 29.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 13.1 = 67.1
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +19.1 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +2 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
13.1/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $217.2M · price swings: 64.4% a year
100% evidence
3. AIOZ Network · AIOZ
65.7/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 31.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.6 = 65.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +67.8 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +1.5 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
9.6/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $5.2M · price swings: 66.9% a year
100% evidence
4. iExec RLC · RLC
65.6/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 33.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.6 = 65.6
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +53.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +53.1 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
7.6/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $13.7M · price swings: 285.9% a year
100% evidence
5. Akash Network · AKT
65.4/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 29.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.2 = 65.4
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +8.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +20.8 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
11.2/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $7.4M · price swings: 87.2% a year
100% evidence
6. Arweave · AR
65.3/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 30.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.6 = 65.3
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +64.9 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +0.8 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
9.6/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $11.1M · price swings: 91.4% a year
100% evidence
7. IoTeX · IOTX
65.1/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 31.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.4 = 65.1
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +47.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +27 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
8.4/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.7M · price swings: 67.6% a year
100% evidence
8. Flux · FLUX
64.6/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 31.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.3 = 64.6
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +33.6 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +4.3 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
8.3/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $4.6M · price swings: 95.9% a year
100% evidence
9. Pieverse · PIEVERSE
63.3/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 26.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.6 = 63.3
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +18.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −8.1 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
11.6/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $16.2M · price swings: 42% a year
100% evidence
10. Nillion · NIL
62.0/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 30.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.5 = 62.0
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +169 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +16.6 pts · above its 200-day average
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $3.7M · price swings: 174.2% a year
100% evidence
11. OKZOO · AIOT
61.9/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 32.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 4.4 = 61.9
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +24.3 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +40.3 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
4.4/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $972.7K · price swings: 126.4% a year
100% evidence
12. OriginTrail · TRAC
61.1/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 25.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.6 = 61.1
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +5.2 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +4.2 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
10.6/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $6.3M · price swings: 77.1% a year
100% evidence
13. Arcblock · ABT
60.5/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 31.8 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.7 = 60.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +134 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +2.7 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
10.2/30Usage growth
Fees -78% · revenue -78.6% · users —
53% evidence
6.9/20Value capture
Fee yield 0.02% · revenue yield 0.02%
100% evidence
11.2/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $907.6M · price swings: 135.1% a year
100% evidence
15. OpenGradient · OPG
59.8/100 · Price-led, little network data · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 24.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.7 = 59.8
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +3.8 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +20.2 pts · 200-day average: —
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
10.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $11.1M · price swings: 79.1% a year
100% evidence
16. AWE Network · AWE
59.5/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 25.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.5 = 59.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −2.7 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +18.4 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
9.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $2.3M · price swings: 59.3% a year
100% evidence
17. Sentient · SENT
58.6/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 27.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.3 = 58.6
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +20 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +13.8 pts · above its 200-day average
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.3/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.4M · price swings: 101% a year
100% evidence
18. Nosana · NOS
58.4/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 29.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.5 = 58.4
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +35.5 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +1.9 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
3.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $948.3K · price swings: 134% a year
100% evidence
19. Bittensor · TAO
57.4/100 · Price-led, little network data · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 19.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 12.5 = 57.4
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +0.8 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +1.6 pts · above its 200-day average
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
12.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $22.6M · price swings: 71% a year
100% evidence
20. Hippius · SN75
57.3/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 25.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.1 = 57.3
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +11.3 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +10.9 pts · 200-day average: —
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
7.1/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $811.2K · price swings: 73.3% a year
100% evidence
21. Arkham · ARKM
56.7/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 20.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.4 = 56.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +0.6 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +8.6 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
11.4/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $26.0M · price swings: 86.8% a year
100% evidence
22. Internet Computer · ICP
54.5/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 18.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.0 = 54.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +2.5 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −1.5 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
11.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $54.1M · price swings: 87.1% a year
100% evidence
23. Render · RENDER
54.3/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 17.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.6 = 54.3
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −14 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −3.2 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
13.3/30Usage growth
Fees -71.7% · revenue -71.9% · users —
53% evidence
17.0/20Value capture
Fee yield 4.26% · revenue yield 4.23%
100% evidence
11.1/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $70.5M · price swings: 77.4% a year
100% evidence
25. Theta Network · THETA
52.1/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 18.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.5 = 52.1
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +5.7 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −6.2 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
8.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $4.1M · price swings: 83.8% a year
100% evidence
26. Law Blocks AI · LBT
51.7/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 18.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.0 = 51.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −15.7 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +21.4 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
8.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $707.0K · price swings: 2.6% a year
100% evidence
27. Targon · SN4
51.6/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 21.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.1 = 51.6
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −2.1 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +8.5 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
5.1/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $199.3K · price swings: 75% a year
100% evidence
28. Golem · GLM
50.6/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.1 = 50.6
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −1.6 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +10.8 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
8.1/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.7M · price swings: 65.4% a year
100% evidence
29. Livepeer · LPT
50.5/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 13.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.9 = 50.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −8.2 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +3.4 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
11.9/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $7.8M · price swings: 66.5% a year
100% evidence
30. Qubic · QUBIC
50.1/100 · Thinly traded · 22% evidence
Exact sum: 18.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.5 = 50.1
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): — · vs its theme (30 days): — · above its 200-day average
20% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.7M · price swings: 60.4% a year
100% evidence
31. FLOCK · FLOCK
49.9/100 · Price-led, little network data · 66% evidence
Exact sum: 14.4 + 15.0 + 12.6 + 7.9 = 49.9
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +7.7 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −21.6 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
12.6/20Value capture
Fee yield 2.43% · revenue yield 2.43%
81% evidence
7.9/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $5.3M · price swings: 87.2% a year
100% evidence
32. Chromia · CHR
49.8/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 18.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.3 = 49.8
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +5.5 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −5.2 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.3/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.6M · price swings: 91.6% a year
100% evidence
33. MultiversX · EGLD
49.7/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 15.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.3 = 49.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +1.8 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −3.4 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
9.3/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $4.2M · price swings: 59.7% a year
100% evidence
34. Kite · KITE
49.4/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 13.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.3 = 49.4
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −6.9 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −0.4 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
11.3/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $13.9M · price swings: 71.7% a year
100% evidence
35. Artificial Superintelligence Alliance · FET
49.0/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 13.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.7 = 49.0
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −3.2 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −4.9 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
10.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $173.9M · price swings: 97.8% a year
100% evidence
36. Alchemist AI · ALCH
48.9/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 15.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.0 = 48.9
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +5.3 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −7.1 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
8.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $3.2M · price swings: 55.6% a year
100% evidence
37. ChainGPT · CGPT
47.5/100 · Thinly traded · 55% evidence
Exact sum: 11.0 + 16.0 + 10.0 + 10.5 = 47.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −21.9 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +2.5 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
16.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
17% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
10.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $4.2M · price swings: 61.5% a year
100% evidence
38. Gensyn · AI
47.5/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 15.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.3 = 47.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +23.6 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −6.8 pts · above its 200-day average
80% evidence
12.8/30Usage growth
Fees -29.8% · revenue -99.3% · users —
53% evidence
5.6/20Value capture
Fee yield 0.2% · revenue yield 0%
100% evidence
4.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $785.9K · price swings: 72.7% a year
100% evidence
40. io.net · IO
47.2/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 15.8 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.4 = 47.2
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −18.2 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +6.8 pts · below its 200-day average
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.4/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.4M · price swings: 114% a year
100% evidence
41. CARV · CARV
45.4/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 13.8 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.6 = 45.4
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −3.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −1.7 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.6/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $2.0M · price swings: 82.3% a year
100% evidence
42. ZIGChain · ZIG
44.7/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 10.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.8 = 44.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −17.9 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −2.4 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
8.8/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $2.5M · price swings: 57.6% a year
100% evidence
43. IQ · IQ
44.2/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 12.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.7 = 44.2
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −9.9 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +3.7 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $547.8K · price swings: 43.2% a year
100% evidence
44. Sahara AI · SAHARA
44.0/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 8.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.8 = 44.0
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −25.3 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +4.2 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
10.8/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $5.4M · price swings: 63.2% a year
100% evidence
45. Victoria VR · VR
43.6/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 10.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.4 = 43.6
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −23.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +22.6 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
8.4/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $956.9K · price swings: 8.1% a year
100% evidence
46. 0G · 0G
43.4/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 9.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.0 = 43.4
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −7 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −23.1 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
9.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $11.8M · price swings: 82.2% a year
100% evidence
47. Theta Fuel · TFUEL
42.9/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 11.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.5 = 42.9
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −10.9 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −0.2 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $418.3K · price swings: 50.2% a year
100% evidence
48. Holoworld · HOLO
42.6/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 12.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.4 = 42.6
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −16.9 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +0.2 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
7.5/30Usage growth
Fees -78.7% · revenue — · users —
50% evidence
11.9/20Value capture
Fee yield 15.84% · revenue yield 0%
81% evidence
9.6/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $21.2M · price swings: 96.3% a year
100% evidence
50. Score · SN44
41.7/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 11.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.5 = 41.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −19 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −3.8 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
5.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.2M · price swings: 85.3% a year
100% evidence
51. Ocean Protocol · OCEAN
41.3/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 11.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 4.9 = 41.3
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −11.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −6.6 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
4.9/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $116.6K · price swings: 40.1% a year
100% evidence
52. Zentry · ZENT
41.3/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 7.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.0 = 41.3
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −38.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +6.3 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
9.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $2.3M · price swings: 47.4% a year
100% evidence
53. Auki · AUKI
40.8/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 13.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 2.6 = 40.8
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −3.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −4.2 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
2.6/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $56.0K · price swings: 81.8% a year
100% evidence
54. Mira · MIRA
40.5/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 10.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.3 = 40.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −25.2 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +1.5 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
5.3/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $442.9K · price swings: 75.4% a year
100% evidence
55. tokenbot · CLANKER
39.7/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 7.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.8 = 39.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −30 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +4.3 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.8/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.2M · price swings: 74.3% a year
100% evidence
56. Codatta · XNY
39.4/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 11.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.2 = 39.4
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −35.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +3.8 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
3.2/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $802.9K · price swings: 139.2% a year
100% evidence
57. Bluwhale · BLUAI
38.9/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 8.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.7 = 38.9
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −56.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +0.7 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
5.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $3.3M · price swings: 96.2% a year
100% evidence
58. Allora · ALLO
38.8/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 4.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.5 = 38.8
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −58.5 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −17 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
9.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $4.6M · price swings: 39.9% a year
100% evidence
59. Velvet · VELVET
38.4/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 8.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.3 = 38.4
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −110 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +17.8 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
5.3/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $3.8M · price swings: 198.4% a year
100% evidence
60. affine · SN120
38.4/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 8.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.1 = 38.4
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −29.8 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −7.4 pts · 200-day average: —
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
5.1/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $471.7K · price swings: 73.7% a year
100% evidence
61. Talus · US
38.3/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 4.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.7 = 38.3
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −115 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −59.4 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
8.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $40.0M · price swings: 431.8% a year
100% evidence
62. Chutes · SN64
37.7/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 6.8 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.9 = 37.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −23.8 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −2.8 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
5.9/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $423.4K · price swings: 66.6% a year
100% evidence
63. Gradients · SN56
37.2/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 8.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 4.2 = 37.2
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −19.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −3 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
4.2/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $44.3K · price swings: 64.5% a year
100% evidence
64. Concordium · CCD
37.0/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 7.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.0 = 37.0
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −36.9 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +2.9 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
5.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $247.0K · price swings: 70.7% a year
100% evidence
65. KAITO · KAITO
37.0/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 2.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.7 = 37.0
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −103 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −7.2 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
9.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $11.1M · price swings: 60% a year
100% evidence
66. NOVA · SN68
35.8/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 7.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.6 = 35.8
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −28.9 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −17.5 pts · 200-day average: —
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
3.6/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $164.1K · price swings: 72.3% a year
100% evidence
67. τemplar · SN3
35.5/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 7.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.4 = 35.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −17.5 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −14.4 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
3.4/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $241.9K · price swings: 74.3% a year
100% evidence
68. Sapien · SAPIEN
35.3/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 2.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.4 = 35.3
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −58.8 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −8.4 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
7.4/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $2.0M · price swings: 44.6% a year
100% evidence
69. Vana · VANA
35.2/100 · Thinly traded · 53% evidence
Exact sum: 9.8 + 15.0 + 5.0 + 5.4 = 35.2
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −29.9 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −0.8 pts · below its 200-day average
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
5.0/20Value capture
Fee yield 0.01% · revenue yield —
50% evidence
5.4/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $302.4K · price swings: 66.2% a year
100% evidence
70. Rujira · RUJI
35.2/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 7.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 2.3 = 35.2
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −42.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −6.9 pts · 200-day average: —
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
2.3/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.6K · price swings: 100.7% a year
100% evidence
71. iota · SN9
34.0/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 4.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 4.3 = 34.0
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −43.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −3.4 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
4.3/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $140.5K · price swings: 70.3% a year
100% evidence
72. dKargo · DKA
33.5/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 3.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.4 = 33.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −52 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −24.7 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
5.4/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $2.3M · price swings: 175.9% a year
100% evidence
73. Fabric Protocol · ROBO
33.0/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 4.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.4 = 33.0
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −76.8 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −19.3 pts · below its 200-day average
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
3.4/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $856.1K · price swings: 92% a year
100% evidence
74. OlaXBT · AIO
32.9/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 4.8 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.1 = 32.9
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −66.1 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −1.2 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
3.1/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $921.5K · price swings: 113.6% a year
100% evidence
75. OpenServ · SERV
32.3/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 4.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.2 = 32.3
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −65.5 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −17.8 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
3.2/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $613.2K · price swings: 89.1% a year
100% evidence
76. Secret · SCRT
31.8/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 4.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 2.7 = 31.8
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −103 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −1.1 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
2.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $69.6K · price swings: 66.9% a year
100% evidence
77. SentismAI · SENTIS
31.6/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 3.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.0 = 31.6
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −94 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −45.7 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
3.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.1M · price swings: 206.2% a year
100% evidence
78. SQD · SQD
31.4/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 2.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 4.0 = 31.4
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −60.6 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −14.2 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
4.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.5M · price swings: 102.7% a year
100% evidence
79. World Mobile Token · WMTX
30.8/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 4.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 1.7 = 30.8
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −75.8 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −6.2 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
1.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $253.8K · price swings: 211.9% a year
100% evidence
80. Singularry · SINGULARRY
28.5/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 1.8 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 1.7 = 28.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −59.2 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −35.6 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
1.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $225.8K · price swings: 135.2% a year
100% evidence
Showing 5 of 80 ranked assets
01 · complete calendar-quarter evidence
Which projects are generating the most network fees?
EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) leads AI crypto on Trailing 12-month fees at $28.5M, 74% ahead of Virtuals Protocol. None of the 5 assets with comparable change data is growing. Coverage is 6 of the 80 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q3 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero.
LeaderEigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) · $28.5M
Gap74% versus #2
Persistence0 assets have positive comparable growth
Coverage6 of 80 assets
Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.
This conclusion weakens if: fee growth turns negative across two complete calendar quarters or fee coverage falls below the stated threshold.
Trailing 12-month fees is the sum of the latest four complete calendar quarters. Growth compares that sum with the prior four-quarter sum.
Trailing 12-month feestop 5
1EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN$28.5M
2Virtuals Protocol VIRTUAL$16.4M
3NEAR Protocol NEAR$1.1M
4FLOCK FLOCK$469.3K
5The Graph GRT$452.4K
Fee growthtop 5
1The Graph GRT-30%
2Virtuals Protocol VIRTUAL-72%
3IoTeX IOTX-74%
4NEAR Protocol NEAR-78%
5EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN-79%
Network fees · asset comparison
6 of 80 coins report it · 5 with a comparable change
Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first
Asset
Trailing 12-month fees
Fee growth
lium SN51
—
—
Chainlink LINK
—
—
AIOZ Network AIOZ
—
—
iExec RLC RLC
—
—
Akash Network AKT
—
—
Arweave AR
—
—
IoTeX IOTX
$1.6K
-74%
Flux FLUX
—
—
Pieverse PIEVERSE
—
—
Nillion NIL
—
—
OKZOO AIOT
—
—
OriginTrail TRAC
—
—
Arcblock ABT
—
—
NEAR Protocol NEAR
$80.0K
-78%
OpenGradient OPG
—
—
AWE Network AWE
—
—
Sentient SENT
—
—
Nosana NOS
—
—
Bittensor TAO
—
—
Hippius SN75
—
—
Arkham ARKM
—
—
Internet Computer ICP
—
—
Render RENDER
—
—
Virtuals Protocol VIRTUAL
$3.5M
-72%
Theta Network THETA
—
—
Law Blocks AI LBT
—
—
Targon SN4
—
—
Golem GLM
—
—
Livepeer LPT
—
—
Qubic QUBIC
—
—
FLOCK FLOCK
$5.7K
—
Chromia CHR
—
—
MultiversX EGLD
—
—
Kite KITE
—
—
Artificial Superintelligence Alliance FET
—
—
Alchemist AI ALCH
—
—
ChainGPT CGPT
—
—
Gensyn AI
—
—
The Graph GRT
$76.2K
-30%
io.net IO
—
—
CARV CARV
—
—
ZIGChain ZIG
—
—
IQ IQ
—
—
Sahara AI SAHARA
—
—
Victoria VR VR
—
—
0G 0G
—
—
Theta Fuel TFUEL
—
—
Holoworld HOLO
—
—
EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN
$1.1M
-79%
Score SN44
—
—
Ocean Protocol OCEAN
—
—
Zentry ZENT
—
—
Auki AUKI
—
—
Mira MIRA
—
—
tokenbot CLANKER
—
—
Codatta XNY
—
—
Bluwhale BLUAI
—
—
Allora ALLO
—
—
Velvet VELVET
—
—
affine SN120
—
—
Talus US
—
—
Chutes SN64
—
—
Gradients SN56
—
—
Concordium CCD
—
—
KAITO KAITO
—
—
NOVA SN68
—
—
τemplar SN3
—
—
Sapien SAPIEN
—
—
Vana VANA
$428
—
Rujira RUJI
—
—
iota SN9
—
—
dKargo DKA
—
—
Fabric Protocol ROBO
—
—
OlaXBT AIO
—
—
OpenServ SERV
—
—
Secret SCRT
—
—
SentismAI SENTIS
—
—
SQD SQD
—
—
World Mobile Token WMTX
—
—
Singularry SINGULARRY
—
—
Showing 20 of 80 assets
02 · complete calendar-quarter evidence
Which projects convert activity into protocol revenue?
Virtuals Protocol leads AI crypto on Trailing 12-month revenue at $16.3M, 1371% ahead of NEAR Protocol. None of the 3 assets with comparable change data is growing. Coverage is 5 of the 80 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q3 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero.
LeaderVirtuals Protocol · $16.3M
Gap1371% versus #2
Persistence0 assets have positive comparable growth
Coverage5 of 80 assets
Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.
This conclusion weakens if: revenue growth turns negative or the revenue-to-fees take rate falls for two complete calendar quarters.
Trailing 12-month revenue is the sum of the latest four complete calendar quarters. Growth compares that sum with the prior four-quarter sum.
Trailing 12-month revenuetop 5
1Virtuals Protocol VIRTUAL$16.3M
2NEAR Protocol NEAR$1.1M
3FLOCK FLOCK$469.3K
4The Graph GRT$1.7K
5EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN$0
Revenue growthtop 3
1Virtuals Protocol VIRTUAL-72%
2NEAR Protocol NEAR-79%
3The Graph GRT-99%
Protocol revenue · asset comparison
5 of 80 coins report it · 3 with a comparable change
Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first
Asset
Trailing 12-month revenue
Revenue growth
lium SN51
—
—
Chainlink LINK
—
—
AIOZ Network AIOZ
—
—
iExec RLC RLC
—
—
Akash Network AKT
—
—
Arweave AR
—
—
IoTeX IOTX
—
—
Flux FLUX
—
—
Pieverse PIEVERSE
—
—
Nillion NIL
—
—
OKZOO AIOT
—
—
OriginTrail TRAC
—
—
Arcblock ABT
—
—
NEAR Protocol NEAR
$56.0K
-79%
OpenGradient OPG
—
—
AWE Network AWE
—
—
Sentient SENT
—
—
Nosana NOS
—
—
Bittensor TAO
—
—
Hippius SN75
—
—
Arkham ARKM
—
—
Internet Computer ICP
—
—
Render RENDER
—
—
Virtuals Protocol VIRTUAL
$3.4M
-72%
Theta Network THETA
—
—
Law Blocks AI LBT
—
—
Targon SN4
—
—
Golem GLM
—
—
Livepeer LPT
—
—
Qubic QUBIC
—
—
FLOCK FLOCK
$5.7K
—
Chromia CHR
—
—
MultiversX EGLD
—
—
Kite KITE
—
—
Artificial Superintelligence Alliance FET
—
—
Alchemist AI ALCH
—
—
ChainGPT CGPT
—
—
Gensyn AI
—
—
The Graph GRT
$0
-99%
io.net IO
—
—
CARV CARV
—
—
ZIGChain ZIG
—
—
IQ IQ
—
—
Sahara AI SAHARA
—
—
Victoria VR VR
—
—
0G 0G
—
—
Theta Fuel TFUEL
—
—
Holoworld HOLO
—
—
EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN
$0
—
Score SN44
—
—
Ocean Protocol OCEAN
—
—
Zentry ZENT
—
—
Auki AUKI
—
—
Mira MIRA
—
—
tokenbot CLANKER
—
—
Codatta XNY
—
—
Bluwhale BLUAI
—
—
Allora ALLO
—
—
Velvet VELVET
—
—
affine SN120
—
—
Talus US
—
—
Chutes SN64
—
—
Gradients SN56
—
—
Concordium CCD
—
—
KAITO KAITO
—
—
NOVA SN68
—
—
τemplar SN3
—
—
Sapien SAPIEN
—
—
Vana VANA
—
—
Rujira RUJI
—
—
iota SN9
—
—
dKargo DKA
—
—
Fabric Protocol ROBO
—
—
OlaXBT AIO
—
—
OpenServ SERV
—
—
Secret SCRT
—
—
SentismAI SENTIS
—
—
SQD SQD
—
—
World Mobile Token WMTX
—
—
Singularry SINGULARRY
—
—
Showing 20 of 80 assets
03 · complete calendar-quarter evidence
Where is capital actually committed on-chain?
EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) leads AI crypto on Quarter-end TVL at $7B, 18585107% ahead of ChainGPT. None of the 2 assets with comparable change data is growing. Coverage is 8 of the 80 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q3 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero.
LeaderEigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) · $7B
Gap18585107% versus #2
Persistence0 assets have positive comparable growth
Coverage8 of 80 assets
Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.
This conclusion weakens if: TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.
Quarter-end TVL uses protocol TVL first for protocol assets and exact-ID chain TVL for chain assets or where protocol TVL is unavailable. A blank is unavailable, not zero. Growth compares with the same complete quarter one year earlier.
Quarter-end TVLtop 5
1EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN$7.0B
2ChainGPT CGPT$37.7K
3IQ IQ$0
4FLOCK FLOCK$0
5KAITO KAITO$0
TVL growthtop 2
1ChainGPT CGPT-1.9%
2EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN-60%
Total value locked · asset comparison
8 of 80 coins report it · 2 with a comparable change
Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first
Asset
Quarter-end TVL
TVL growth
lium SN51
—
—
Chainlink LINK
—
—
AIOZ Network AIOZ
—
—
iExec RLC RLC
—
—
Akash Network AKT
—
—
Arweave AR
—
—
IoTeX IOTX
—
—
Flux FLUX
—
—
Pieverse PIEVERSE
—
—
Nillion NIL
—
—
OKZOO AIOT
—
—
OriginTrail TRAC
—
—
Arcblock ABT
—
—
NEAR Protocol NEAR
—
—
OpenGradient OPG
—
—
AWE Network AWE
—
—
Sentient SENT
—
—
Nosana NOS
—
—
Bittensor TAO
—
—
Hippius SN75
—
—
Arkham ARKM
—
—
Internet Computer ICP
—
—
Render RENDER
—
—
Virtuals Protocol VIRTUAL
$0
—
Theta Network THETA
—
—
Law Blocks AI LBT
—
—
Targon SN4
—
—
Golem GLM
—
—
Livepeer LPT
—
—
Qubic QUBIC
—
—
FLOCK FLOCK
$0
—
Chromia CHR
—
—
MultiversX EGLD
—
—
Kite KITE
—
—
Artificial Superintelligence Alliance FET
—
—
Alchemist AI ALCH
—
—
ChainGPT CGPT
$37.7K
-1.9%
Gensyn AI
—
—
The Graph GRT
$0
—
io.net IO
—
—
CARV CARV
—
—
ZIGChain ZIG
—
—
IQ IQ
$0
—
Sahara AI SAHARA
—
—
Victoria VR VR
—
—
0G 0G
—
—
Theta Fuel TFUEL
—
—
Holoworld HOLO
—
—
EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN
$7.0B
-60%
Score SN44
—
—
Ocean Protocol OCEAN
—
—
Zentry ZENT
—
—
Auki AUKI
—
—
Mira MIRA
—
—
tokenbot CLANKER
—
—
Codatta XNY
—
—
Bluwhale BLUAI
—
—
Allora ALLO
—
—
Velvet VELVET
—
—
affine SN120
—
—
Talus US
—
—
Chutes SN64
—
—
Gradients SN56
—
—
Concordium CCD
—
—
KAITO KAITO
$0
—
NOVA SN68
—
—
τemplar SN3
—
—
Sapien SAPIEN
—
—
Vana VANA
—
—
Rujira RUJI
—
—
iota SN9
—
—
dKargo DKA
—
—
Fabric Protocol ROBO
—
—
OlaXBT AIO
—
—
OpenServ SERV
—
—
Secret SCRT
—
—
SentismAI SENTIS
—
—
SQD SQD
—
—
World Mobile Token WMTX
$0
—
Singularry SINGULARRY
—
—
Showing 20 of 80 assets
04 · let price answer last
Which assets lead on price and relative strength?
Nillion leads the AI tape on Bitcoin-relative strength at +169% over 90 days. 22 of 75 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Price shows what happened; BTC-relative strength shows whether the asset beat crypto’s opportunity-cost benchmark. Both lines run through 2026-10-30.
Complete set · no silent drops
Which assets are in AI?
80 of the 106 coins assigned to AI are rated and ranked below, and the other 26 are listed under it with the reason each one is not rated: price-only names that publish no protocol activity included. Each asset has exactly one canonical functional theme, chosen by a specific-to-general first match on its categories.
26 of the 106 AI coins are not rated this week: 26 report no traded volume. Each one stays on this page with its reason instead of being scored at the midpoint of a range nothing measured.
No traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
Showing 20 of 26 not-rated coins
Methodology · boundaries make the answer useful
What can make this comparison misleading?
This AI comparison names 5 ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. The largest is that crypto network activity is not company earnings: protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders. Coverage is also uneven: 4 of 80 assets carry enough native evidence to rank on more than price.
Crypto network activity is not company earnings. Protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders.
Market-cap values are a dated universe snapshot, not point-in-time historical supply data.
Current category labels are applied to historical prices; this creates survivorship and taxonomy hindsight.
Funding rates, open interest, liquidations, exchange flows, unlock schedules, historical circulating supply and developer activity are not held and are not inferred.
Equal weighting is used for sector history because true historical market-cap weights are unavailable.
Price and technicalsThrough 2026-10-30. Five-year weekly observations benchmarked to Bitcoin.
Protocol activityThrough 2026-10-30. Fees, revenue, protocol TVL and DEX volume.
Chain activityUsers and transactions: not published for these coins; chain TVL: not published for these coins.
Market capSnapshot dated 2026-11-05; no historical supply series is implied.
Questions the page should answer directly
Crypto analysis FAQs
These 20 answers cover the questions this page can settle from data it holds: what the category is, how the score is built, what the coverage gaps are, and what would change the read. Every answer below is also present in the page’s FAQ schema and in its plain-text rendition. None of them is a recommendation.
What is AI crypto?
AI crypto coins are the coins CoinGecko tags as Artificial Intelligence (AI), AI Agents, AI Framework, AI Applications or DeFAI. Each coin sits in one theme only: the first, most specific one its tags match. We track 106 AI coins, 80 of them rated below.
What is the total market cap of AI crypto coins?
The 79 AI coins on this page with a current market cap were worth about $23.5 billion together, by CoinGecko's reading of 5 November 2026. 1 more have only an older reading, so they are not counted. Individual figures are in the table.
Are AI crypto coins outperforming Bitcoin?
AI has returned +13.1% versus Bitcoin over 52 weeks and -9.3% over 13 weeks on an equal-weight current-member index. 22/75 covered assets are above their 200-day averages as of 2026-10-30.
Which AI asset has the strongest research score?
lium ranks first at 67.8/100: 34.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.1 = 67.8. It is labelled “Thinly traded” with 50% overall evidence and 0% native-economics evidence.
Why are some AI coins not rated?
26 of the 106 coins are not rated this week: 26 report no traded volume. They stay listed with the reason beside each one rather than being scored at a neutral midpoint, because a missing reading is not a middling reading.
How is the AI 4-factor score calculated?
The exact sum is Market leadership /35 + Network and economic traction /30 + Value capture /20 + Liquidity and downside risk /15. Missing data pulls only the affected factor toward neutral and lowers evidence; it is never silently reweighted.
Why can a AI asset be labelled price-led?
Price-led means price and relative-strength evidence exists but less than half of the native traction and value-capture evidence is available. Such assets remain visible but rank below fully evidenced assets.
Does protocol revenue accrue to the token?
Not necessarily. Protocol fees and revenue measure network economics; token-holder value depends on the protocol’s burn, buyback, staking, distribution and governance rules. This page never assumes accrual merely because revenue exists.
Does crypto have a P/E or PEG ratio?
No comparable company-style P/E or PEG is used. Where coverage permits, the page shows network fee yield and protocol-revenue yield against a dated market-cap snapshot, with an explicit token-accrual caveat.
How much history is shown for AI?
The page shows five years of weekly price and relative-strength history and 20 complete calendar quarters of on-chain activity where available. Missing periods remain gaps.
Why do the crypto data dates differ?
Prices and technical metrics run through 2026-10-30; protocol activity through 2026-10-30; chain users and transactions through the latest available chain date; chain TVL through the latest available chain-TVL date; market capitalisation is a separate snapshot dated 2026-11-05.
Are stablecoins and wrapped tokens included in AI?
No. Pegged, wrapped, liquid-staking receipt and tokenized-asset instruments are excluded because they do not have independent price discovery.
Can one token appear in multiple raw crypto categories?
Yes, but pages on this site assign each asset to exactly one functional theme using a specific-to-general first-match taxonomy. AI therefore has one canonical membership list.
What would invalidate the current AI theme read?
Two of the three weakening conditions are already in place as of 2026-10-30: the 13-week return versus Bitcoin is -9.3% (below zero) and 22 of 75 covered assets are above the 200-day average (below one-third). The read depends on native protocol activity remaining supportive, a contraction there would complete the invalidation.
Does this page include funding rates, open interest or token unlocks?
No. Those datasets are not held in the current research store, so the page names them as unavailable rather than inferring them from price.
Which projects are generating the most network fees?
EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) leads AI crypto on Trailing 12-month fees at $28.5M, 74% ahead of Virtuals Protocol. None of the 5 assets with comparable change data is growing. Coverage is 6 of the 80 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q3 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if fee growth turns negative across two complete calendar quarters or fee coverage falls below the stated threshold.
Which projects convert activity into protocol revenue?
Virtuals Protocol leads AI crypto on Trailing 12-month revenue at $16.3M, 1371% ahead of NEAR Protocol. None of the 3 assets with comparable change data is growing. Coverage is 5 of the 80 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q3 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if revenue growth turns negative or the revenue-to-fees take rate falls for two complete calendar quarters.
Where is capital actually committed on-chain?
EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) leads AI crypto on Quarter-end TVL at $7B, 18585107% ahead of ChainGPT. None of the 2 assets with comparable change data is growing. Coverage is 8 of the 80 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q3 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.
Which AI project has the largest fee base?
EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) leads covered trailing-12-month fees at $28.5M. Coverage is 6/80; this is network activity, not automatically token-holder income.
Which are the biggest AI crypto coins by market cap?
Chainlink is the largest AI crypto coin by market capitalisation at $8.4B, ahead of NEAR Protocol at $5.2B and Bittensor at $2.6B. The 80 AI coins on this page carry $23.5B between them, with a market-cap figure on file for 79 of them. Market-cap metadata is dated 2026-11-05.