Five-year price · 20 complete calendar quarters · BTC-relative

AI Crypto Coins

Is AI outperforming Bitcoin, and is leadership broad?

Bottom line

Chainlink ranks first for research priority in AI crypto at 72.4/100, and its native activity proof is incomplete. The theme's 13-week excess versus Bitcoin is -17% on 39% breadth, which is what decides whether that lead is isolated or broad. 2 of the 83 assets here carry enough native evidence to move past a tape-led label.

These AI coins are part of the cryptocurrency universe this site tracks daily — 894 of the top 1,000 crypto currency assets by market cap, priced from exchange closes and matched to protocol fees and revenue where a protocol publishes them.

The theme itself · before any single company

How has AI moved against Bitcoin?

The line below covers up to 5 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this theme is 49% behind Bitcoin. Protocol revenue across its protocols fell 60% on average over the last four reported quarters.

FADING · −7 in 4w·Price down, no fundamental support7 of 73 coins ahead of Bitcoin by 5% or more over three months

RS — · 18/73 >200d (−4) · 7/73 lead (−7) · EPS —

AI, equal-weighted, based at 200 Bitcoin, same base, same start trailing 12-month protocol revenue rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the theme line is an equal-weighted index of its 73 coins. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month protocol revenue, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the theme taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while protocol revenue grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

BTC LED market context

AI vs Bitcoin — Relative Strength & Breadth

AI crypto has outperformed Bitcoin by 4.1% over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of current members. Over 13 weeks the figure is -17%. 27 of 69 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. SentismAI leads Bitcoin-relative strength at +109.4%. Price readings are as of 2026-09-11.

-17%13w vs BTC

+4.1%52w vs BTC

27/69Above 200-DMA

SENTISRS leader · +109%

Assets

canonical functional membership

Activity-covered

2/83

enough native evidence

Top score

72.4/100

Chainlink

Calendar quarters

complete; missing stays missing

Global asset selection · top 20 shown

Showing 20 of 83 assets

00 · exact additive research priority

4-Factor Crypto Evidence Score

A within-theme research-priority score for the 83 assets in AI, out of 100. The four displayed point contributions add exactly to the total, and the market regime changes the action label, never the arithmetic. Chainlink is highest at 72.4/100 on 50% evidence. It ranks research attention, not portfolio action.

Market leadership · 35Network & economic traction · 30Value capture · 20Liquidity & downside risk · 15

Chainlink leads the current research queue at 72.4/100 with 50% evidence.

2/83 assets have enough native activity evidence to move beyond a tape-led label.

27 of the 110 AI coins are not rated this week: 24 have no price within 7 days, 3 report no traded volume. They are listed in full below the ranking.

Missing native metrics are not scored as zero and are not silently reweighted. They pull only the affected factor toward neutral and lower its visible evidence percentage. An asset with nothing measurable at all is not scored at 50 either — it is listed as not rated.

1. Chainlink · LINK

72.4/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 33.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 13.9 = 72.4

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

33.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 24.9 pp · RS-sector 20.5 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

13.9/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $393,171,559 · vol 80.5%

100% evidence

2. Pieverse · PIEVERSE

70.6/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 34.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.1 = 70.6

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

34.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 66.3 pp · RS-sector 51.2 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

11.1/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $21,296,085 · vol 134.8%

100% evidence

3. FLOCK · FLOCK

69.7/100 · Illiquid · research only · 66% evidence

Exact sum: 30.3 + 15.0 + 16.7 + 7.7 = 69.7

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

30.3/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 23.4 pp · RS-sector 90.4 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

16.7/20Value capture

Fee yield 6.94% · revenue yield 6.94%

81% evidence

7.7/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $4,507,329 · vol 190.3%

100% evidence

4. lium · SN51

66.9/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 34.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.3 = 66.9

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

34.6/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 77.1 pp · RS-sector 44.1 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

7.3/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $1,036,470 · vol 88.3%

100% evidence

5. MultiversX · EGLD

66.4/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 31.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.5 = 66.4

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

31.9/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 38.2 pp · RS-sector 63.3 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

9.5/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $6,278,817 · vol 118.2%

100% evidence

6. Arweave · AR

65.6/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 29.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.9 = 65.6

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

29.7/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 7.6 pp · RS-sector 36.3 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

10.9/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $11,802,556 · vol 103%

100% evidence

7. Ocean Protocol · OCEAN

63.7/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 34.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 4.4 = 63.7

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

34.3/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 32.3 pp · RS-sector 53 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

4.4/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $68,186 · vol 95.3%

100% evidence

8. SentismAI · SENTIS

63.6/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 28.8 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.8 = 63.6

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

28.8/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 109.4 pp · RS-sector -12.5 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

9.8/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $2,337,249 · vol 31.5%

100% evidence

9. Law Blocks AI · LBT

61.6/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 28.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.1 = 61.6

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

28.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 14.4 pp · RS-sector -3.8 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

8.1/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $711,644 · vol 26.1%

100% evidence

10. AIOZ Network · AIOZ

60.5/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 27.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.8 = 60.5

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

27.7/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 9.6 pp · RS-sector 33.1 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

7.8/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $2,235,373 · vol 97.9%

100% evidence

11. Theta Fuel · TFUEL

60.2/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 28.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.1 = 60.2

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

28.1/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 10.3 pp · RS-sector 40.3 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

7.1/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $702,975 · vol 85%

100% evidence

12. Theta Network · THETA

60.2/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 24.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.3 = 60.2

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

24.9/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -2.8 pp · RS-sector 30.3 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

10.3/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $4,720,694 · vol 85.3%

100% evidence

13. Internet Computer · ICP

59.9/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 21.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 13.5 = 59.9

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

21.4/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -11.2 pp · RS-sector 13.6 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

13.5/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $50,049,458 · vol 73.4%

100% evidence

14. NEAR Protocol · NEAR

59.3/100 · Mixed · 86% evidence

Exact sum: 26.0 + 12.5 + 8.8 + 12.0 = 59.3

Decision use: Price leads usage. Wait for fees, users or TVL to confirm the move.

26.0/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -8.6 pp · RS-sector 31.5 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

12.5/30Network & economic traction

Fees -69% · revenue -69.1% · users —

53% evidence

8.8/20Value capture

Fee yield 0.07% · revenue yield 0.07%

100% evidence

12.0/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $255,397,853 · vol 91.4%

100% evidence

15. EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) · EIGEN

57.7/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 71% evidence

Exact sum: 22.7 + 12.5 + 11.9 + 10.6 = 57.7

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

22.7/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -8.7 pp · RS-sector 15.6 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

12.5/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

17% evidence

11.9/20Value capture

Fee yield 30.93% · revenue yield 0%

81% evidence

10.6/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $15,820,381 · vol 90.3%

100% evidence

16. τemplar · SN3

54.8/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 23.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.4 = 54.8

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

23.4/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -0.2 pp · RS-sector 26.4 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

6.4/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $1,364,411 · vol 130.7%

100% evidence

17. Virtuals Protocol · VIRTUAL

54.5/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 66% evidence

Exact sum: 13.3 + 15.0 + 13.7 + 12.5 = 54.5

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

13.3/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -21.6 pp · RS-sector -6.4 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

13.7/20Value capture

Fee yield 5.35% · revenue yield 5.35%

81% evidence

12.5/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $55,034,633 · vol 92%

100% evidence

18. Talus · US

53.0/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 22.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.4 = 53.0

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

22.6/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 11.4 pp · RS-sector -58 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

5.4/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $2,520,140 · vol 230.3%

100% evidence

19. AWE Network · AWE

52.1/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 17.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.9 = 52.1

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

17.2/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -9.1 pp · RS-sector -11.1 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

9.9/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $2,458,247 · vol 52.4%

100% evidence

20. Targon · SN4

52.0/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 22.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.0 = 52.0

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

22.0/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -17.4 pp · RS-sector 8.6 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

5.0/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $364,757 · vol 91.8%

100% evidence

Showing 20 of 83 ranked assets

01 · complete calendar-quarter evidence

Which projects are generating the most network fees?

LeaderEigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) · $49.2M

Gap147% versus #2

Persistence1 assets have positive comparable growth

Coverage8/83 assets

Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.

This conclusion weakens if: fee growth turns negative across two complete calendar quarters or fee coverage falls below the stated threshold.

Trailing 12-month fees is the sum of the latest four complete calendar quarters. Growth compares that sum with the prior four-quarter sum.

Trailing 12-month feestop five

1EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN$49.2M

2Virtuals Protocol VIRTUAL$19.9M

3NEAR Protocol NEAR$1.9M

4FLOCK FLOCK$1.0M

5The Graph GRT$616.3K

Fee growthtop five

1The Graph GRT+27%

2NEAR Protocol NEAR-69%

3IoTeX IOTX-74%

Network fees · asset comparison

8/83 level · 3/83 change

Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first

Asset	Trailing 12-month fees	Fee growth
chainlink	—	—
pieverse	—	—
flock-2	$48.7K	—
celium	—	—
elrond-erd-2	—	—
arweave	—	—
ocean-protocol	—	—
sentismai	—	—
law-blocks	—	—
aioz-network	—	—
theta-fuel	—	—
theta-token	—	—
internet-computer	—	—
near	$140.7K	-69%
eigenlayer	$2.5M	—
templar	—	—
virtual-protocol	$997.6K	—
talus	—	—
stp-network	—	—
targon	—	—
infinity-ground	—	—
codatta	—	—
origintrail	—	—
bittensor	—	—
zignaly	—	—
zelcash	—	—
bluwhale	—	—
mira-3	—	—
nillion	—	—
golem	—	—
nosana	—	—
everipedia	—	—
fetch-ai	—	—
arcblock	—	—
score	—	—
render-token	—	—
allora	—	—
chaingpt	—	—
chromaway	—	—
the-graph	$97.2K	+27%
zero-gravity	—	—
holoworld	—	—
opengradient	—	—
qubic-network	—	—
rujira	—	—
arkham	—	—
livepeer	—	—
hippius	—	—
sentient	—	—
sapien-2	—	—
dkargo	—	—
nova-3	—	—
carv	—	—
sahara-ai	—	—
io	—	—
victoria-vr	—	—
akash-network	—	—
affine	—	—
velvet	—	—
gensyn	—	—
kite-2	—	—
world-mobile-token	—	—
chutes	—	—
iexec-rlc	—	—
concordium	—	—
zentry	—	—
kaito	—	—
alchemist-ai	—	—
singularitynet	—	—
tokenbot-2	—	—
robo-token-2	—	—
okzoo	—	—
vana	$642	—
gradients	—	—
subsquid	—	—
iota-2	—	—
iotex	$1.6K	-74%
secret	—	—
olaxbt	—	—
story-2	$671	—
openserv	—	—
auki-labs	—	—
singularry	—	—

Showing 20 of 83 assets

02 · complete calendar-quarter evidence

Which projects convert activity into protocol revenue?

LeaderVirtuals Protocol · $19.9M

Gap971% versus #2

Persistence0 assets have positive comparable growth

Coverage5/83 assets

Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.

This conclusion weakens if: revenue growth turns negative or the revenue-to-fees take rate falls for two complete calendar quarters.

Trailing 12-month revenue is the sum of the latest four complete calendar quarters. Growth compares that sum with the prior four-quarter sum.

Trailing 12-month revenuetop five

1Virtuals Protocol VIRTUAL$19.9M

2NEAR Protocol NEAR$1.9M

3FLOCK FLOCK$1.0M

4The Graph GRT$4.1K

5EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN$0

Revenue growthtop five

1NEAR Protocol NEAR-69%

2The Graph GRT-99%

Protocol revenue · asset comparison

5/83 level · 2/83 change

Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first

Asset	Trailing 12-month revenue	Revenue growth
chainlink	—	—
pieverse	—	—
flock-2	$48.7K	—
celium	—	—
elrond-erd-2	—	—
arweave	—	—
ocean-protocol	—	—
sentismai	—	—
law-blocks	—	—
aioz-network	—	—
theta-fuel	—	—
theta-token	—	—
internet-computer	—	—
near	$134.8K	-69%
eigenlayer	$0	—
templar	—	—
virtual-protocol	$997.6K	—
talus	—	—
stp-network	—	—
targon	—	—
infinity-ground	—	—
codatta	—	—
origintrail	—	—
bittensor	—	—
zignaly	—	—
zelcash	—	—
bluwhale	—	—
mira-3	—	—
nillion	—	—
golem	—	—
nosana	—	—
everipedia	—	—
fetch-ai	—	—
arcblock	—	—
score	—	—
render-token	—	—
allora	—	—
chaingpt	—	—
chromaway	—	—
the-graph	$2	-99%
zero-gravity	—	—
holoworld	—	—
opengradient	—	—
qubic-network	—	—
rujira	—	—
arkham	—	—
livepeer	—	—
hippius	—	—
sentient	—	—
sapien-2	—	—
dkargo	—	—
nova-3	—	—
carv	—	—
sahara-ai	—	—
io	—	—
victoria-vr	—	—
akash-network	—	—
affine	—	—
velvet	—	—
gensyn	—	—
kite-2	—	—
world-mobile-token	—	—
chutes	—	—
iexec-rlc	—	—
concordium	—	—
zentry	—	—
kaito	—	—
alchemist-ai	—	—
singularitynet	—	—
tokenbot-2	—	—
robo-token-2	—	—
okzoo	—	—
vana	—	—
gradients	—	—
subsquid	—	—
iota-2	—	—
iotex	—	—
secret	—	—
olaxbt	—	—
story-2	—	—
openserv	—	—
auki-labs	—	—
singularry	—	—

Showing 20 of 83 assets

03 · complete calendar-quarter evidence

Where is capital actually committed on-chain?

LeaderEigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) · $4.4B

Gap11445374% versus #2

Persistence0 assets have positive comparable growth

Coverage9/83 assets

Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.

This conclusion weakens if: TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.

Quarter-end TVL uses protocol TVL first for protocol assets and exact-ID chain TVL for chain assets or where protocol TVL is unavailable. A blank is unavailable, not zero. Growth compares with the same complete quarter one year earlier.

Quarter-end TVLtop five

1EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN$4.4B

2ChainGPT CGPT$38.2K

3IQ IQ$0

4FLOCK FLOCK$0

5KAITO KAITO$0

TVL growthtop five

1ChainGPT CGPT-5.3%

2EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN-62%

Total value locked · asset comparison

9/83 level · 2/83 change

Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first

Asset	Quarter-end TVL	TVL growth
chainlink	—	—
pieverse	—	—
flock-2	$0	—
celium	—	—
elrond-erd-2	—	—
arweave	—	—
ocean-protocol	—	—
sentismai	—	—
law-blocks	—	—
aioz-network	—	—
theta-fuel	—	—
theta-token	—	—
internet-computer	—	—
near	—	—
eigenlayer	$4.4B	-62%
templar	—	—
virtual-protocol	$0	—
talus	—	—
stp-network	—	—
targon	—	—
infinity-ground	—	—
codatta	—	—
origintrail	—	—
bittensor	—	—
zignaly	—	—
zelcash	—	—
bluwhale	—	—
mira-3	—	—
nillion	—	—
golem	—	—
nosana	—	—
everipedia	$0	—
fetch-ai	—	—
arcblock	—	—
score	—	—
render-token	—	—
allora	—	—
chaingpt	$38.2K	-5.3%
chromaway	—	—
the-graph	$0	—
zero-gravity	—	—
holoworld	—	—
opengradient	—	—
qubic-network	—	—
rujira	—	—
arkham	—	—
livepeer	—	—
hippius	—	—
sentient	—	—
sapien-2	—	—
dkargo	—	—
nova-3	—	—
carv	—	—
sahara-ai	—	—
io	—	—
victoria-vr	—	—
akash-network	—	—
affine	—	—
velvet	—	—
gensyn	—	—
kite-2	—	—
world-mobile-token	$0	—
chutes	—	—
iexec-rlc	—	—
concordium	—	—
zentry	—	—
kaito	$0	—
alchemist-ai	—	—
singularitynet	$0	—
tokenbot-2	—	—
robo-token-2	—	—
okzoo	—	—
vana	—	—
gradients	—	—
subsquid	—	—
iota-2	—	—
iotex	—	—
secret	—	—
olaxbt	—	—
story-2	—	—
openserv	—	—
auki-labs	—	—
singularry	—	—

Showing 20 of 83 assets

04 · let price answer last

Which assets lead on price and relative strength?

SentismAI leads the AI tape on Bitcoin-relative strength at +109% over 90 days. 27 of 69 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Price shows what happened; BTC-relative strength shows whether the asset beat crypto’s opportunity-cost benchmark. Both lines run through 2026-09-11.

Complete set · no silent drops

Which assets are in AI?

83 of the 110 coins assigned to AI are rated and ranked below, and the other 27 are listed under it with the reason each one is not rated — tape-only names that publish no protocol activity included. Each asset has exactly one canonical functional theme, chosen by a specific-to-general first match on its categories.

Rank	Asset	Price	90d	RS-BTC	200-DMA	30d vol	Median volume	Price quality	Activity source	Score	Evidence
1	Chainlink LINK	$11.54	+45%	+25%	Above	81%	$393.2M	usable	tape only	72.4	50%
2	Pieverse PIEVERSE	$1.23	+86%	+66%	Above	135%	$21.3M	usable	tape only	70.6	50%
3	FLOCK FLOCK	$0.0607	+43%	+23%	Above	190%	$4.5M	usable	protocol	69.7	66%
4	lium SN51	$23.28	+97%	+77%	Above	88%	$1.0M	usable	tape only	66.9	50%
5	MultiversX EGLD	$4.61	+58%	+38%	Above	118%	$6.3M	usable	tape only	66.4	50%
6	Arweave AR	$2.61	+27%	+7.6%	Above	103%	$11.8M	usable	tape only	65.6	50%
7	Ocean Protocol OCEAN	$0.1543	+52%	+32%	Above	95%	$68.2K	usable	tape only	63.7	50%
8	SentismAI SENTIS	$0.2207	+129%	+109%	Above	32%	$2.3M	usable	tape only	63.6	50%
9	Law Blocks AI LBT	$0.3217	+34%	+14%	Above	26%	$711.6K	usable	tape only	61.6	50%
10	AIOZ Network AIOZ	$0.0739	+29%	+9.6%	Above	98%	$2.2M	usable	tape only	60.5	50%
11	Theta Fuel TFUEL	$0.0110	+30%	+10%	Above	85%	$703.0K	usable	tape only	60.2	50%
12	Theta Network THETA	$0.1894	+17%	-2.8%	Above	85%	$4.7M	usable	tape only	60.2	50%
13	Internet Computer ICP	$2.72	+8.6%	-11%	Above	73%	$50.0M	usable	tape only	59.9	50%
14	NEAR Protocol NEAR	$2.37	+11%	-8.6%	Above	91%	$255.4M	usable	protocol	59.3	86%
15	EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN	$0.2132	+11%	-8.7%	Above	90%	$15.8M	usable	protocol	57.7	71%
16	τemplar SN3	$6.94	+20%	-0.2%	Below	131%	$1.4M	usable	tape only	54.8	50%
17	Virtuals Protocol VIRTUAL	$0.6309	-1.8%	-22%	Below	92%	$55.0M	usable	protocol	54.5	66%
18	Talus US	$0.0159	+31%	+11%	Above	230%	$2.5M	usable	tape only	53.0	50%
19	AWE Network AWE	$0.0591	+11%	-9.1%	Above	52%	$2.5M	usable	tape only	52.1	50%
20	Targon SN4	$13.65	+2.4%	-17%	Above	92%	$364.8K	usable	tape only	52.0	50%
21	Infinity Ground AIN	$0.0106	+12%	-7.4%	Above	33%	$7	usable	tape only	51.8	50%
22	Codatta XNY	$0.0066	+17%	-3.1%	Above	103%	$962.5K	usable	tape only	51.3	50%
23	OriginTrail TRAC	$0.3487	-6.3%	-26%	Above	119%	$3.4M	usable	tape only	51.0	50%
24	Bittensor TAO	$235.60	-10%	-30%	—	88%	$22.3M	usable	tape only	50.8	43%
25	ZIGChain ZIG	$0.0448	-19%	-39%	Above	120%	$7.7M	usable	tape only	50.0	50%
26	Flux FLUX	$0.0507	-3.3%	-23%	Below	64%	$4.1M	usable	tape only	48.3	50%
27	Bluwhale BLUAI	$0.0116	+1.6%	-18%	Above	94%	$3.8M	usable	tape only	48.2	50%
28	Mira MIRA	$0.0471	-12%	-32%	Above	83%	$705.3K	usable	tape only	48.0	50%
29	Nillion NIL	$0.0431	+11%	-9.0%	—	124%	$1.5M	usable	tape only	47.8	43%
30	Golem GLM	$0.1063	-4.3%	-24%	Below	60%	$2.9M	usable	tape only	46.2	50%
31	Nosana NOS	$0.2920	-16%	-36%	Above	64%	$325.9K	usable	tape only	46.0	50%
32	IQ IQ	$0.0008	-2.4%	-22%	Below	99%	$790.9K	usable	protocol	45.4	50%
33	Artificial Superintelligence Alliance FET	$0.1662	-20%	-40%	Below	104%	$126.6M	usable	tape only	45.2	50%
34	Arcblock ABT	$0.2024	-2.0%	-22%	Below	73%	$66.9K	usable	tape only	45.1	50%
35	Score SN44	$9.14	-13%	-33%	Above	95%	$777.9K	usable	tape only	44.3	50%
36	Render RENDER	$1.39	-22%	-41%	Below	66%	$27.8M	usable	tape only	44.2	50%
37	Allora ALLO	$0.2252	-39%	-59%	Above	83%	$13.0M	usable	tape only	43.8	50%
38	ChainGPT CGPT	$0.0196	-6.8%	-27%	Below	60%	$5.3M	usable	protocol	43.6	55%
39	Chromia CHR	$0.0151	-2.8%	-23%	Below	75%	$1.2M	usable	tape only	43.5	50%
40	The Graph GRT	$0.0176	-12%	-32%	—	90%	$646.4K	usable	protocol	43.3	79%
41	0G 0G	$0.1949	-35%	-55%	Below	151%	$20.6M	usable	tape only	43.3	50%
42	Holoworld HOLO	$0.0623	-3.3%	-23%	—	81%	$1.1M	usable	tape only	43.3	43%
43	OpenGradient OPG	$0.1029	-42%	-62%	—	86%	$10.7M	usable	tape only	43.2	43%
44	Qubic QUBIC	$0.0000	—	—	Below	—	$929.2K	return withheld · discontinuity	tape only	43.1	19%
45	Rujira RUJI	$0.2101	-10%	-30%	—	117%	$4.8K	usable	tape only	42.8	43%
46	Arkham ARKM	$0.1000	-23%	-42%	Below	80%	$40.5M	usable	tape only	42.7	50%
47	Livepeer LPT	$1.36	-25%	-44%	Below	63%	$6.8M	usable	tape only	42.1	50%
48	Hippius SN75	$4.14	-9.5%	-29%	—	90%	$391.6K	usable	tape only	41.8	43%
49	Sentient SENT	$0.0141	-9.1%	-29%	—	72%	$621.7K	usable	tape only	41.4	43%
50	Sapien SAPIEN	$0.0745	-9.5%	-29%	Below	69%	$2.7M	usable	tape only	40.7	50%
51	dKargo DKA	$0.0036	-14%	-34%	Below	87%	$1.2M	usable	tape only	40.6	50%
52	NOVA SN68	$5.07	-10%	-30%	—	95%	$183.2K	usable	tape only	40.5	43%
53	CARV CARV	$0.0344	-16%	-36%	Below	63%	$1.2M	usable	tape only	40.4	50%
54	Sahara AI SAHARA	$0.0092	-40%	-60%	Below	94%	$8.7M	usable	tape only	40.3	50%
55	io.net IO	$0.1287	-29%	-48%	—	71%	$858.2K	usable	tape only	40.1	43%
56	Victoria VR VR	$0.0015	-0.9%	-21%	Below	70%	$834.7K	usable	tape only	40.0	50%
57	Akash Network AKT	$0.5310	-25%	-45%	Below	88%	$3.9M	usable	tape only	39.5	50%
58	affine SN120	$11.97	-18%	-38%	—	92%	$406.8K	usable	tape only	39.2	43%
59	Velvet VELVET	$0.0596	-85%	-105%	Below	593%	$10.9M	usable	tape only	39.1	50%
60	Gensyn AI	$0.0178	-21%	-41%	—	51%	$242.8K	usable	tape only	39.1	43%
61	Kite KITE	$0.1081	-44%	-64%	Below	102%	$15.5M	usable	tape only	38.4	50%
62	World Mobile Token WMTX	$0.0333	-18%	-38%	Below	61%	$928.3K	usable	protocol	38.2	50%
63	Chutes SN64	$16.51	-7.4%	-27%	Below	92%	$702.4K	usable	tape only	38.0	50%
64	iExec RLC RLC	$0.2773	-22%	-42%	Below	61%	$2.0M	usable	tape only	37.7	50%
65	Concordium CCD	$0.0037	-17%	-37%	Below	113%	$146.7K	usable	tape only	37.3	50%
66	Zentry ZENT	$0.0020	-24%	-44%	Below	91%	$1.4M	usable	tape only	37.2	50%
67	KAITO KAITO	$0.3050	-37%	-57%	Below	88%	$22.0M	usable	protocol	36.9	50%
68	Alchemist AI ALCH	$0.0320	-52%	-72%	Below	90%	$2.7M	usable	tape only	36.7	50%
69	SingularityNET AGIX	$0.0723	-19%	-39%	Below	100%	$3.4K	usable	protocol	36.4	50%
70	tokenbot CLANKER	$11.99	-17%	-37%	Below	93%	$1.7M	usable	tape only	35.5	50%
71	Fabric Protocol ROBO	$0.0095	-53%	-72%	—	141%	$2.2M	usable	tape only	35.5	43%
72	OKZOO AIOT	$0.0434	-38%	-58%	Below	92%	$709.2K	usable	tape only	35.4	50%
73	Vana VANA	$0.9100	-19%	-39%	—	60%	$424.2K	usable	protocol	35.3	53%
74	Gradients SN56	$3.79	-25%	-45%	Below	87%	$67.6K	usable	tape only	35.3	50%
75	SQD SQD	$0.0322	-22%	-41%	Below	132%	$2.1M	usable	tape only	35.2	50%
76	iota SN9	$6.36	-25%	-45%	Below	99%	$152.4K	usable	tape only	35.1	50%
77	IoTeX IOTX	$0.0029	-14%	-34%	Below	74%	$1.8M	usable	protocol	34.9	70%
78	Secret SCRT	$0.0086	-86%	-105%	Below	214%	$6.3M	usable	tape only	33.1	50%
79	OlaXBT AIO	$0.0407	-69%	-89%	Below	198%	$1.4M	usable	tape only	32.1	50%
80	Data Network DATA	$0.0003	-53%	-73%	Below	180%	$8	usable	protocol	32.0	60%
81	OpenServ SERV	$0.0213	-68%	-87%	Below	139%	$780.9K	usable	tape only	31.5	50%
82	Auki AUKI	$0.0042	-27%	-47%	Below	92%	$64.2K	usable	tape only	31.3	50%
83	Singularry SINGULARRY	$0.0087	-65%	-84%	Below	90%	$21.8K	usable	tape only	29.2	50%

Showing 20 of 83 assets

Not rated — and why

27 of the 110 AI coins are not rated this week: 24 have no price within 7 days, 3 report no traded volume. Each one stays on this page with its reason instead of being scored at the midpoint of a range nothing measured.

Coin	Market cap	Reason	Detail
Venice Token VVV	$573.2M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Grass GRASS	$361.8M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Unibase UB	$247.3M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Cortex CX	$109.1M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Pearl PRL	$98.7M	No traded volume reported	No traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
TAGGER TAG	$97.1M	No traded volume reported	No traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
Aethir ATH	$91.1M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
AI Rig Complex ARC	$80.1M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
UnifAI Network UAI	$74.2M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Quack AI Q	$73.8M	No price this week	Last traded price is 2026-06-18, 85 days before this page's 2026-09-11 reading.
ChainOpera AI COAI	$56.8M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
aPriori APR	$53.7M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
BankrCoin BNKR	$42.5M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
V.I.T.R.I.O.L. Network VIT	$42.4M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
TokenOS AI TOS	$37.3M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Perle PRL	$33.5M	No traded volume reported	No traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
Vanta Network SN8	$30.6M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Rei REI	$28.8M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Swarm Network TRUTH	$28.1M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
MEET48 IDOL	$27.9M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
The Innovation Game TIG	$26.7M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Freysa AI FAI	$25.3M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Acurast ACU	$24.9M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Dolphin POD	$20.8M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
INFINIT IN	$18.1M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Morpheus AI MOR	$16.7M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Trusta AI TA	$15.6M	No price this week	No traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.

Showing 20 of 27 not-rated coins

Methodology · boundaries make the answer useful

What can make this comparison misleading?

This AI comparison names 5 ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. The largest is that crypto network activity is not company earnings: protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders. Coverage is also uneven — 2 of 83 assets carry enough native evidence to rank on more than price.

Crypto network activity is not company earnings. Protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders.
Market-cap values are a dated universe snapshot, not point-in-time historical supply data.
Current category labels are applied to historical prices; this creates survivorship and taxonomy hindsight.
Funding rates, open interest, liquidations, exchange flows, unlock schedules, historical circulating supply and developer activity are not held and are not inferred.
Equal weighting is used for sector history because true historical market-cap weights are unavailable.

Price and technicalsThrough 2026-09-11. Five-year weekly observations benchmarked to Bitcoin.

Protocol activityThrough 2026-09-11. Fees, revenue, protocol TVL and DEX volume.

Chain activityUsers and transactions through unavailable; separately sourced chain TVL through unavailable.

Market capSnapshot dated 2026-07-04; no historical supply series is implied.

Questions the page should answer directly

Crypto analysis FAQs

These 20 answers cover the questions this page can settle from data it holds — what the category is, how the score is built, what the coverage gaps are, and what would change the read. Every answer below is also present in the page’s FAQ schema and in its plain-text rendition. None of them is a recommendation.

What is AI crypto?

AI crypto refers to cryptocurrency projects grouped by what they actually do rather than by market fashion. This page tracks 83 such coins by market cap, price and Bitcoin-relative strength, with protocol fees and revenue where a project publishes them. Readings are as of 2026-09-11.

What is the total market cap of AI crypto coins?

The 83 AI coins on this page have a combined market cap of about $17.8B as of 2026-07-04. Individual figures are in the table. Market-cap metadata is a dated snapshot, separately from the price series.

Are AI crypto coins outperforming Bitcoin?

AI has returned +4.1% versus Bitcoin over 52 weeks and -17% over 13 weeks on an equal-weight current-member index. 27/69 covered assets are above their 200-day averages as of 2026-09-11.

Which AI asset has the strongest research score?

Chainlink ranks first at 72.4/100: 33.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 13.9 = 72.4. It is labelled “Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete” with 50% overall evidence and 0% native-economics evidence.

Why are some AI coins not rated?

27 of the 110 coins are not rated this week: 24 have no price within 7 days, 3 report no traded volume. They stay listed with the reason beside each one rather than being scored at a neutral midpoint, because a missing reading is not a middling reading.

How is the AI 4-factor score calculated?

The exact sum is Market leadership /35 + Network and economic traction /30 + Value capture /20 + Liquidity and downside risk /15. Missing data pulls only the affected factor toward neutral and lowers evidence; it is never silently reweighted.

Why can a AI asset be labelled tape-led?

Tape-led means price and relative-strength evidence exists but less than half of the native traction and value-capture evidence is available. Such assets remain visible but rank below fully evidenced assets.

Does protocol revenue accrue to the token?

Not necessarily. Protocol fees and revenue measure network economics; token-holder value depends on the protocol’s burn, buyback, staking, distribution and governance rules. This page never assumes accrual merely because revenue exists.

Does crypto have a P/E or PEG ratio?

No comparable company-style P/E or PEG is used. Where coverage permits, the page shows network fee yield and protocol-revenue yield against a dated market-cap snapshot, with an explicit token-accrual caveat.

How much history is shown for AI?

The page shows five years of weekly price and relative-strength history and 20 complete calendar quarters of on-chain activity where available. Missing periods remain gaps.

Why do the crypto data dates differ?

Prices and technical metrics run through 2026-09-11; protocol activity through 2026-09-11; chain users and transactions through the latest available chain date; chain TVL through the latest available chain-TVL date; market capitalisation is a separate snapshot dated 2026-07-04.

Are stablecoins and wrapped tokens included in AI?

No. Pegged, wrapped, liquid-staking receipt and tokenized-asset instruments are excluded because they do not have independent price discovery.

Can one token appear in multiple raw crypto categories?

Yes, but pages on this site assign each asset to exactly one functional theme using a specific-to-general first-match taxonomy. AI therefore has one canonical membership list.

What would invalidate the current AI theme read?

One of the three weakening conditions is already in place: 13-week Bitcoin-relative return is already negative (-17%). The read fully weakens if fewer than one-third of covered assets remain above the 200-day average and the leading asset’s native activity contracts.

Does this page include funding rates, open interest or token unlocks?

No. Those datasets are not held in the current research store, so the page names them as unavailable rather than inferring them from price.

Which projects are generating the most network fees?

EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) leads AI crypto on Trailing 12-month fees at $49.2M, 147% ahead of Virtuals Protocol. 1 of 3 assets with comparable change data is growing, fastest at The Graph. Coverage is 8 of the 83 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if fee growth turns negative across two complete calendar quarters or fee coverage falls below the stated threshold.

Which projects convert activity into protocol revenue?

Virtuals Protocol leads AI crypto on Trailing 12-month revenue at $19.9M, 971% ahead of NEAR Protocol. 0 of 2 assets with comparable change data are growing. Coverage is 5 of the 83 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if revenue growth turns negative or the revenue-to-fees take rate falls for two complete calendar quarters.

Where is capital actually committed on-chain?

EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) leads AI crypto on Quarter-end TVL at $4.4B, 11445374% ahead of ChainGPT. 0 of 2 assets with comparable change data are growing. Coverage is 9 of the 83 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.

Which AI project has the largest fee base?

EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) leads covered trailing-12-month fees at $49.2M. Coverage is 8/83; this is network activity, not automatically token-holder income.

Which are the biggest AI crypto coins by market cap?

Chainlink is the largest AI crypto coin by market capitalisation at $5.9B, ahead of NEAR Protocol at $2.6B and Bittensor at $2B. The 83 AI coins on this page carry $17.8B between them, with a market-cap figure on file for 83 of them. Market-cap metadata is dated 2026-07-04.

About

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!