Waste Management Stocks in the US

The largest Waste Management stocks in the US by market value are Waste Management, Inc. ($94.7B), Republic Services, Inc. ($74.8B) and Waste Connections, Inc. ($48.0B), at prices of 4 Nov 2026.

• Waste Management, Inc.: $238.19 | market value $94.7B | P/E 31.4
• Republic Services, Inc.: $245.46 | market value $74.8B | P/E 30
• Waste Connections, Inc.: $191.81 | market value $48.0B | P/E 34.2
• GFL Environmental Inc.: $45.29 | market value $19.8B | P/E 5.6
• Clean Harbors, Inc.: $288.24 | market value $15.2B | P/E 36
• Casella Waste Systems, Inc.: $98.88 | market value $6.3B | P/E 1081.4
• Enviri Corporation: $20.51 | market value $577M
• Onterris, Inc.: $16.13 | market value $566M
• Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.: $12.81 | market value $272M | P/E 220.6
• American Battery Technology Company: $1.29 | market value $184M

The other 2 Waste Management companies are in the full list below.

Share price | market value | P/E, biggest first. Prices and market values as of 4 Nov 2026; ratios as in the score list below.

Ranked by the 4-Factor Sector Score (growth & earnings 35, capital efficiency 25, valuation 20, relative strength 20). Prices as of 4 Nov 2026.

All 12 listed US Waste Management companies are named here, largest first. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies and carries its own as-of date. One large company cannot set the reading.

1. Waste Management, Inc.$94.7B
2. Republic Services, Inc.$74.8B
3. Waste Connections, Inc.$48.0B
4. GFL Environmental Inc.$19.8B
5. Clean Harbors, Inc.$15.2B
6. Casella Waste Systems, Inc.$6.3B
7. Enviri Corporation$577M
8. Onterris, Inc.$566M
9. Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.$272M
10. American Battery Technology Company$184M
11. Seahawk Recycling Holdings, Inc.$149M
12. One and one Green Technologies. Inc$98M

10 Waste Management companies in the Waste Management industry group (every listed company) have a page on Sector Alpha, by market value as of 4 November 2026, and all 10 are listed below, largest first. The largest is Waste Management, Inc. ($94.7 billion) and the smallest with a market value is American Battery Technology Company.

Download all 10 Waste Management companies (CSV)

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the last two years (104 weeks) this industry is 5% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 1% on average over the last four reported quarters, close to flat.

5 of the 9 companies with a long enough price record ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months.

Ahead of S&P 500 on the three-month view for 1 week running; 5 of the 9 companies in the industry index above their 200-day average (2 more than four weeks earlier); 5 of those 9 ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months (5 more than four weeks earlier); earnings rising at 5 of the 9 that report earnings.

Ahead of S&P 500 for 1 week after being behind, with 0 → 5 of 9 participating. Earnings mixed, 5 of 9 members have higher trailing twelve-month earnings than a year ago.

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the gap between them tells the story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of 9 of its 12 companies (the 3 with too short a price record are ranked in the scorecard but cannot sit in this line). The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member set to 100 at the start and the industry taking the middle value, so a price line pulling away from flat bars means the market is paying more for the same earnings. A bar turns grey when that figure is lower than the quarter before. The rules are fixed and the same everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover or tap any point to read both values and the gap.

Waste Management has done worse than the S&P 500 by 9.7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 4.2%. Waste Connections, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +21.7%.

Waste Management has done worse than the S&P 500 by 9.7% over 52 weeks and by 4.2% over 13 weeks. 4 of 12 companies we track are beating the S&P 500 on relative strength (how a share price has done against the index over recent months) (2 have no relative-strength reading yet), and 7 of the 10 with a long enough price history are ahead of the industry itself.

A score that ranks each company against the others in its industry. The four parts shown always add up to the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or old evidence affects only its own part, never as a hidden adjustment.

Waste Connections, Inc. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 85.3% evidence confidence.

Ranked last: too little evidence (2 companies)

Under 60% of the evidence behind these scores is available, so they rank after every company above, whatever the score.

Enviri Corporation has the strongest one-year price move in Waste Management at +68.3%. Waste Connections, Inc. leads on relative strength against the S&P 500, at +8.1%. 4 of 12 companies we track are ahead of the index on that measure (2 have no relative-strength reading yet). Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 4 November 2026.

Price and relative strength

Price · same starting point: Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts: the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

RS vs S&P 500: How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.

RS vs sector: The same measure taken against Waste Management itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.

Biggest one-year moves

Strongest against S&P 500

Strongest against the sector itself

Waste Management, Inc. has the highest Revenue among the 12 Waste Management companies compared here, at $25,667 million. Republic Services, Inc. is next at $16,890 million. American Battery Technology Company has the highest Revenue growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Waste Management, Inc. is the largest at $25,667 million, 52% ahead of Republic Services, Inc. American Battery Technology Company's growth is capped at 100% on the scoring scale; the full change over the last 12 months is 450% from a $22 million base, with 9 reported quarters out of the last 20. Fast growth from a smaller base is not yet the same as proven size.

What this means: Waste Management, Inc. is the size to compare against; American Battery Technology Company is the one growing fastest. The faster grower has to keep that growth and turn it into margin and returns before it counts as more than a fast start.

This conclusion weakens if: Waste Management, Inc.'s growth falls below American Battery Technology Company's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.

Revenue · company comparison

Revenue · largest

Revenue growth · fastest growers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

Revenue shows both size and speed. A large company can absorb shocks and pay for wide distribution; faster growth can mean market-share gains, new capacity or stronger demand. The best sign is usually growth that lasts without hurting margins and returns.

Waste Connections, Inc. has the highest OPM among the 12 Waste Management companies compared here, at 20.8%. Republic Services, Inc. is next at 20.4%. American Battery Technology Company has the highest Margin change at +33.6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 11 of 12 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.

What the numbers say: Waste Connections, Inc. leads opm at 20.8%; American Battery Technology Company leads margin change at +33.6 percentage points.

What this means: Waste Connections, Inc. sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.

Operating margin · company comparison

OPM · highest

Margin change · fastest expanders

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Waste Management, Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 12 Waste Management companies compared here, at $2,853 million. Republic Services, Inc. is next at $2,185 million. Waste Connections, Inc. has the highest Profit growth at 82.2%, so level and change sit with different companies. 10 of 12 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Waste Management, Inc. earns the most, $2,853 million of profit over the last 12 months, 30.6% above Republic Services, Inc. Waste Connections, Inc. shows 82.2% growth from a profit base of $1,133 million. A fast rate from a small base matters less than a large profit that keeps coming.

What this means: Waste Management, Inc. sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.

Net profit · company comparison

Net profit · largest

Profit growth · fastest growers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Seahawk Recycling Holdings, Inc. has the highest ROCE among the 12 Waste Management companies compared here, at 29.8%. One and one Green Technologies. Inc is next at 18.7%. The same company also has the highest ROCE change, at +37 percentage points. 12 of 12 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.

What the numbers say: Seahawk Recycling Holdings, Inc. leads ROCE at 29.8%, 11.1 percentage points above One and one Green Technologies. Inc. A high return reported once may be one good year; a high return reported year after year shows a lasting business.

What this means: Seahawk Recycling Holdings, Inc. sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.

Return on capital · company comparison

ROCE · highest

ROCE change · fastest improvers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Clean Harbors, Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 12 Waste Management companies compared here, at 2.29×. Casella Waste Systems, Inc. is next at 3.1×. Onterris, Inc. has the lowest P/E at −65.4×, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 12 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Clean Harbors, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 2.29×, 26.1% below Casella Waste Systems, Inc. That would need today's multiple, the company's own history and steady growth to agree.

What this means: A low valuation is a reason to look closer at the business, not a conclusion on its own.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is worked out the same way every time, as the P/E on the last 12 months of reported earnings divided by that growth rate, never on expected earnings. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.

Valuation · company comparison

PEG · lowest PEG

P/E · lowest P/E

All-company data · latest reported quarter

This Waste Management comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 12 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still come from a very small starting figure.

Keep these limits visible

• A high growth rate can come from a very small starting figure. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
• A high ROCE can be temporary, or look high because the capital base is small. It is best read beside margin, cash flow and how much is spent back on the business.
• The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks published data only. Management quality, upcoming events and risks are not part of it.
• An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 12 Waste Management companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Sep 2026 and market data through 4 November 2026.

These 22 answers restate the Waste Management comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 12 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Sep 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 4 November 2026. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.