Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-04
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Recreational Vehicles Stocks

Recreational Vehicles: THOR Industries, Inc. owns the largest revenue base; BRP Inc. has the fastest current growth.

01 · the industry itself · before any single company

How has Recreational Vehicles moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 48% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 3% on average over the last four reported quarters — close to flat.

ASLEEP · 1y −4.8%~Price down, no fundamental support1 of 10 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS — · 5/10 >200d (+1) · 1/10 lead (+0) · EPS 6/10↑

20020262025202420232022 177348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100120Jun 22Dec 22Jun 23Dec 23Jun 24Dec 24Jun 25Dec 25Jun 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 5 reporting · thin coverageJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 11 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 106, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 9 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 115, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 11 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 120, against 100 at the start · up 20.1% on a year ago · 8 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 109, against 100 at the start · down 11.3% on a year ago · 11 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 78, against 100 at the start · down 30.9% on a year ago · 10 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 70, against 100 at the start · down 41.0% on a year ago · 12 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 64, against 100 at the start · down 40.1% on a year ago · 10 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 47, against 100 at the start · down 39.9% on a year ago · 10 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 43, against 100 at the start · down 41.2% on a year ago · 10 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 27, against 100 at the start · down 68.5% on a year ago · 10 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 13, against 100 at the start · down 77.5% on a year ago · 10 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 17, against 100 at the start · down 66.4% on a year ago · 10 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 26, against 100 at the start · down 7.2% on a year ago · 10 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 27, against 100 at the start · down 13.4% on a year ago · 10 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 29, against 100 at the start · up 13.5% on a year ago · 9 reportingJun 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 19, against 100 at the start · up 19.3% on a year ago · 4 reporting · thin coverageNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two19No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
20020262025202420232022 177348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100120Jun 22Jun 23Jun 24Jun 25Jun 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 5 reporting · thin coverageJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 11 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 106, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 9 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 115, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 11 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 120, against 100 at the start · up 20.1% on a year ago · 8 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 109, against 100 at the start · down 11.3% on a year ago · 11 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 78, against 100 at the start · down 30.9% on a year ago · 10 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 70, against 100 at the start · down 41.0% on a year ago · 12 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 64, against 100 at the start · down 40.1% on a year ago · 10 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 47, against 100 at the start · down 39.9% on a year ago · 10 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 43, against 100 at the start · down 41.2% on a year ago · 10 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 27, against 100 at the start · down 68.5% on a year ago · 10 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 13, against 100 at the start · down 77.5% on a year ago · 10 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 17, against 100 at the start · down 66.4% on a year ago · 10 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 26, against 100 at the start · down 7.2% on a year ago · 10 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 27, against 100 at the start · down 13.4% on a year ago · 10 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 29, against 100 at the start · up 13.5% on a year ago · 9 reportingJun 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 19, against 100 at the start · up 19.3% on a year ago · 4 reporting · thin coverageNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two19No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Recreational Vehicles, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 10 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Recreational Vehicles outperforming S&P 500?

Recreational Vehicles has underperformed S&P 500 by 3.9% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 3.7%. 2 of 10 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Polaris Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +12.6%.

-3.7%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
-3.9%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
2/10Stocks leading S&P 500
4/10Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Recreational Vehicles has underperformed S&P 500 by 3.9% over 52 weeks and 3.7% over 13 weeks. 2 of 10 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 10 beat the sector itself. THOR Industries, Inc. leads with revenue of $9,821 million, based on 6 of 10 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Companies
10
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$29.4B
Brunswick Corporation
Revenue growing
6/6
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
2/10
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 10
03 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
BRP Inc. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 81.1% evidence confidence.
THOR Industries, Inc. looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
Harley-Davidson, Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1BRP Inc.DOO 71.8/100Favorable setup81% evidence TURNING 30.0/35 Revenue 16% · PAT 67.8% · OPM change 4.3 pp 83% evidence 16.6/25 ROCE 5.6% · OPM 9.4% 76% evidence 14.8/20 P/E 24.8× · PEG 0.29 65% evidence 10.4/20 RS sector -3.8% · RS bench -12.2% · 1Y 25.8%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 30 + 16.6 + 14.8 + 10.4 = 71.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Polaris Inc.PII 56.0/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence FADING 20.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0 pp 39% evidence 10.4/25 ROCE 5% · OPM -2.4% 76% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 56.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.6/20 RS sector 12.6% · RS bench 3.5% · 1Y 43.4%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.2 + 10.4 + 8.8 + 16.6 = 56 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
3LCI IndustriesLCII 54.8/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence BASING 21.8/35 Revenue 9.1% · PAT 29.5% · OPM change 0.9 pp 53% evidence 13.5/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 8.7% 57% evidence 16.5/20 P/E 15× · PEG 0.45 65% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -7.8% · RS bench -15.9% · 1Y 12.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.8 + 13.5 + 16.5 + 3 = 54.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Brunswick CorporationBC 51.3/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 19.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.5 pp 39% evidence 11.7/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 3.6% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 84.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.7/20 RS sector 8.6% · RS bench -0.2% · 1Y 46.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.4 + 11.7 + 8.5 + 11.7 = 51.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Harley-Davidson, Inc.HOG 49.2/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence BASING 15.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -10.1 pp 39% evidence 8.0/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 2% 76% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 15× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.6/20 RS sector 7.7% · RS bench -0.9% · 1Y 9.5%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.4 + 8 + 11.2 + 14.6 = 49.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6THOR Industries, Inc.THO 45.5/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence BASING 13.0/35 Revenue 2.4% · PAT 18.1% · OPM change -2.6 pp 83% evidence 10.7/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 3.5% 76% evidence 15.4/20 P/E 16× · PEG 0.83 65% evidence 6.4/20 RS sector -16.5% · RS bench -24.2% · 1Y -15.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13 + 10.7 + 15.4 + 6.4 = 45.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
7Patrick Industries, Inc.PATK 42.8/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence BASING 18.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0 pp 39% evidence 13.0/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 6.5% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 22.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.5/20 RS sector -19.3% · RS bench -26.6% · 1Y -13.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.1 + 13 + 10.2 + 1.5 = 42.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Winnebago Industries, Inc.WGO 37.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 14.5/35 Revenue 3.4% · PAT — · OPM change -0.6 pp 62% evidence 7.9/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 3.3% 76% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 21.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.0/20 RS sector -11.6% · RS bench -19.7% · 1Y 4.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 14.5 + 7.9 + 10.5 + 5 = 37.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.MCFT 49.6/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 17.6/35 Revenue 15.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change -7.1 pp 53% evidence 6.8/25 ROCE -0.7% · OPM -1.7% 57% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 31.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.7/20 RS sector 12% · RS bench 3.1% · 1Y 29.9%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.6 + 6.8 + 9.5 + 15.7 = 49.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
10Malibu Boats, Inc.MBUU 37.3/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence ASLEEP 12.5/35 Revenue 8.8% · PAT — · OPM change -8.4 pp 40% evidence 6.6/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM -0.8% 57% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 38.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.0/20 RS sector -1.9% · RS bench -10.4% · 1Y -8.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.5 + 6.6 + 9.2 + 9 = 37.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
04 · what price has already done

Market action

Brunswick Corporation has the strongest one-year price move in Recreational Vehicles at +46.5%. Polaris Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +3.5%. 2 of 10 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

THOR Industries, Inc. has the highest Revenue among the 10 Recreational Vehicles companies compared here, at $9,821 million. BRP Inc. is next at $8,987 million. BRP Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at 16%, so level and change sit with different companies. 6 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: THOR Industries, Inc. is the scale leader at $9,821 million, 9.3% ahead of BRP Inc.. BRP Inc.'s growth is 16% from a $8,987 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderTHOR Industries, Inc. · $9,821 million
Gap9.3% versus #2 · BRP Inc.
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/10 companies · 178 observations

Investor read: THOR Industries, Inc. is the scale benchmark; BRP Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: THOR Industries, Inc.'s growth falls below BRP Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
2BRP Inc. DOO$9.0B
3LCI Industries LCII · older report$4.2B
5Malibu Boats, Inc. MBUU · older report$827M
Revenue growthfastest growers
1BRP Inc. DOO16%
2MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. MCFT · older report16%
3LCI Industries LCII · older report9.1%
4Malibu Boats, Inc. MBUU · older report8.8%
Revenue · company comparison
6/10 level · 6/10 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
THOR Industries, Inc. THO$2.8B-3.9%Jun 2026
BRP Inc. DOO$2.4B30%Jun 2026
Polaris Inc. PII$1.7B8.0%Jun 2026
Brunswick Corporation BC$1.4B-4.8%Sep 2026
Harley-Davidson, Inc. HOG$1.2B-12%Jun 2026
LCI Industries LCII$1.1B4.3%Mar 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. PATK$997M-0.6%Jun 2026
Winnebago Industries, Inc. WGO$699M-9.8%Jun 2026
Malibu Boats, Inc. MBUU$236M3.1%Mar 2026
MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. MCFT$78M2.6%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

BRP Inc. · DOO

$1.6B
$2.3B
$1.8B
$2.4B
$2.7B
$3.1B
$2.4B
$2.8B
$2.4B
$2.6B
$2.0B
$1.8B
$2.0B
$2.1B
$1.8B
$1.9B
$2.3B
$2.5B
$2.4B

Brunswick Corporation · BC

$1.4B
$1.7B
$1.8B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.4B

Harley-Davidson, Inc. · HOG

$1.0B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.6B
$1.1B
$1.8B
$1.4B
$1.5B
$1.1B
$1.7B
$1.6B
$1.2B
$688M
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$496M
$1.2B

LCI Industries · LCII

$1.2B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.1B
$894M
$973M
$1.0B
$959M
$838M
$968M
$1.1B
$915M
$803M
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.0B
$933M
$1.1B

Malibu Boats, Inc. · MBUU

$264M
$344M
$353M
$302M
$339M
$375M
$372M
$256M
$211M
$203M
$159M
$172M
$200M
$229M
$207M
$195M
$189M
$236M

MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. · MCFT

$131M
$144M
$169M
$170M
$159M
$167M
$94M
$84M
$54M
$65M
$63M
$76M
$80M
$69M
$72M
$78M

Patrick Industries, Inc. · PATK

$1.1B
$1.3B
$1.5B
$1.1B
$952M
$900M
$921M
$866M
$933M
$1.0B
$919M
$846M
$1.0B
$1.0B
$976M
$924M
$997M

Polaris Inc. · PII

$2.0B
$1.8B
$2.1B
$2.3B
$2.4B
$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$1.7B
$2.0B
$1.7B
$1.8B
$1.5B
$1.9B
$1.8B
$1.9B
$1.7B

THOR Industries, Inc. · THO

$4.0B
$3.9B
$4.7B
$3.8B
$3.1B
$2.3B
$2.9B
$2.7B
$2.5B
$2.2B
$2.8B
$2.5B
$2.1B
$2.0B
$2.9B
$2.5B
$2.4B
$2.1B
$2.8B

Winnebago Industries, Inc. · WGO

$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.5B
$1.2B
$952M
$867M
$901M
$771M
$763M
$704M
$786M
$721M
$626M
$620M
$775M
$777M
$703M
$657M
$699M

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

BRP Inc. · DOO

28%
71%
31%
34%
14%
-12%
-15%
-18%
-35%
-17%
-19%
-7.7%
4.3%
14%
16%
30%

Brunswick Corporation · BC

18%
19%
2.8%
-7.3%
-20%
-17%
-25%
-15%
-10%
0.2%
6.8%
16%
-4.8%

Harley-Davidson, Inc. · HOG

-4.1%
21%
12%
20%
-1.6%
-6.1%
-7.8%
-3.3%
12%
-26%
-35%
-23%
-19%
17%
-28%
-12%

LCI Industries · LCII

40%
-2.8%
-26%
-41%
-34%
-15%
-6.3%
-0.5%
3.9%
-4.6%
-4.2%
8.1%
4.9%
13%
16%
4.3%

Malibu Boats, Inc. · MBUU

27%
19%
28%
9.0%
5.4%
-15%
-38%
-46%
-57%
-33%
-5.2%
13%
30%
13%
-5.5%
3.1%

MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. · MCFT

8.3%
30%
10%
-1.2%
-45%
-47%
-68%
-33%
-9.5%
48%
6.2%
14%
2.6%

Patrick Industries, Inc. · PATK

45%
4.9%
-17%
-39%
-17%
-9.0%
13%
-0.2%
-2.3%
7.5%
3.1%
6.2%
9.2%
-0.6%

Polaris Inc. · PII

8.0%
32%
21%
22%
7.5%
-3.9%
-4.8%
-20%
-12%
-23%
-23%
-12%
-5.5%
7.0%
9.5%
8.0%

THOR Industries, Inc. · THO

6.4%
-21%
-39%
-37%
-28%
-20%
-6.0%
-4.4%
-7.5%
-14%
-8.6%
3.4%
-0.4%
11%
5.4%
-3.9%

Winnebago Industries, Inc. · WGO

14%
-18%
-26%
-38%
-35%
-20%
-19%
-13%
-6.5%
-18%
-12%
-1.4%
7.8%
12%
6.0%
-9.8%
06 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

BRP Inc. has the highest OPM among the 10 Recreational Vehicles companies compared here, at 9.4%. LCI Industries is next at 8.7%. The same company also holds the highest Margin change, at +4.3 percentage points. 10 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026. Its OPM series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: BRP Inc. leads both opm at 9.4% and margin change at +4.3 percentage points.

LeaderBRP Inc. · 9.4%
Gap8% versus #2 · LCI Industries
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage10/10 companies · 178 observations

Investor read: BRP Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1BRP Inc. DOO9.4%
2LCI Industries LCII · older report8.7%
Margin changefastest expanders
1BRP Inc. DOO+4.3 pp
2LCI Industries LCII · older report+0.9 pp
4Polaris Inc. PII0.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
10/10 level · 10/10 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
BRP Inc. DOO9.4%+4.3 ppJun 2026
LCI Industries LCII8.7%+0.9 ppMar 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. PATK6.5%0.0 ppJun 2026
Brunswick Corporation BC3.6%−3.5 ppSep 2026
THOR Industries, Inc. THO3.5%−2.6 ppJun 2026
Winnebago Industries, Inc. WGO3.3%−0.6 ppJun 2026
Harley-Davidson, Inc. HOG2.0%−10.1 ppJun 2026
Malibu Boats, Inc. MBUU-0.8%−8.4 ppMar 2026
MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. MCFT-1.7%−7.1 ppMar 2026
Polaris Inc. PII-2.4%0.0 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

BRP Inc. · DOO

12%
15%
11%
14%
14%
14%
12%
14%
15%
13%
9.5%
6.7%
7.1%
4.9%
5.1%
4.8%
9.0%
0.5%
9.4%

Brunswick Corporation · BC

15%
14%
15%
14%
14%
11%
8.0%
8.1%
11%
7.7%
-4.8%
4.6%
7.1%
-18%
3.1%
3.6%

Harley-Davidson, Inc. · HOG

-0.7%
19%
19%
21%
0.3%
21%
15%
14%
-2.0%
15%
15%
9.2%
-28%
12%
8.6%
35%
-73%
2.0%

LCI Industries · LCII

9.4%
16%
14%
7.7%
-2.6%
2.1%
5.4%
4.8%
0.3%
6.0%
8.6%
5.9%
2.0%
7.8%
7.9%
7.3%
3.8%
8.7%

Malibu Boats, Inc. · MBUU

15%
21%
19%
16%
14%
19%
-6.1%
11%
7.0%
-37%
-15%
-3.3%
1.6%
7.6%
3.3%
-0.4%
-1.9%
-0.8%

MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. · MCFT

13%
16%
19%
19%
17%
17%
11%
8.0%
-1.1%
1.5%
0.3%
5.4%
7.5%
5.5%
3.8%
-1.7%

Patrick Industries, Inc. · PATK

8.3%
12%
12%
8.3%
7.1%
6.2%
8.2%
8.2%
6.4%
8.3%
8.1%
4.7%
6.5%
8.3%
6.8%
6.2%
6.5%

Polaris Inc. · PII

8.0%
5.6%
9.4%
11%
11%
7.4%
8.8%
8.9%
6.2%
2.2%
6.1%
3.8%
3.7%
-2.4%
-0.7%
1.1%
-1.7%
-2.4%

THOR Industries, Inc. · THO

8.2%
9.4%
10%
9.3%
6.7%
1.7%
6.4%
5.5%
4.3%
0.8%
5.8%
5.3%
0.5%
0.5%
6.1%
4.1%
1.6%
0.5%
3.5%

Winnebago Industries, Inc. · WGO

13%
12%
12%
11%
9.0%
8.9%
8.9%
7.5%
5.1%
5.0%
5.5%
-2.5%
-0.1%
1.3%
3.9%
2.6%
2.0%
1.8%
3.3%

Margin change · reported quarter history

BRP Inc. · DOO

−3.6 pp
+2.5 pp
−0.6 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.6 pp
+0.9 pp
−1.6 pp
−2.1 pp
−6.9 pp
−8.0 pp
−7.7 pp
−4.4 pp
−1.9 pp
+1.9 pp
−4.4 pp
+4.3 pp

Brunswick Corporation · BC

−0.9 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.6 pp
−3.8 pp
−6.0 pp
−2.5 pp
−3.7 pp
−12.8 pp
−3.5 pp
−3.9 pp
−25.5 pp
+7.9 pp
−3.5 pp

Harley-Davidson, Inc. · HOG

+0.6 pp
+5.5 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.4 pp
−3.6 pp
−7.0 pp
−2.3 pp
−5.5 pp
−0.4 pp
−4.3 pp
−26.1 pp
−3.1 pp
−6.3 pp
+26.2 pp
−44.7 pp
−10.1 pp

LCI Industries · LCII

+5.6 pp
+0.1 pp
−12.0 pp
−14.3 pp
−8.8 pp
−2.9 pp
+2.9 pp
+3.9 pp
+3.2 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.8 pp
−0.7 pp
+1.4 pp
+1.8 pp
+0.9 pp

Malibu Boats, Inc. · MBUU

+2.2 pp
+1.5 pp
−0.8 pp
−2.1 pp
−24.6 pp
−4.8 pp
−7.4 pp
−55.5 pp
−9.3 pp
−14.5 pp
−5.4 pp
+44.4 pp
+18.7 pp
+2.9 pp
−3.5 pp
−8.4 pp

MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. · MCFT

+3.9 pp
+6.5 pp
+0.2 pp
−1.3 pp
−7.8 pp
−8.6 pp
−18.5 pp
−10.9 pp
−2.6 pp
+8.6 pp
+4.0 pp
+3.5 pp
−7.1 pp

Patrick Industries, Inc. · PATK

+2.5 pp
−0.5 pp
−1.2 pp
−5.6 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.1 pp
+2.1 pp
−0.1 pp
−3.5 pp
+0.1 pp
0.0 pp
−1.3 pp
+1.5 pp
0.0 pp

Polaris Inc. · PII

−1.6 pp
+2.0 pp
+2.7 pp
+1.8 pp
−0.6 pp
−2.0 pp
−4.5 pp
−5.2 pp
−2.7 pp
−5.1 pp
−2.5 pp
−4.6 pp
−6.8 pp
−2.7 pp
−5.4 pp
0.0 pp

THOR Industries, Inc. · THO

+0.5 pp
−1.5 pp
−7.7 pp
−4.0 pp
−3.8 pp
−2.4 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.2 pp
−3.8 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.3 pp
−1.2 pp
+1.1 pp
0.0 pp
−2.6 pp

Winnebago Industries, Inc. · WGO

−1.1 pp
−3.7 pp
−2.8 pp
−3.2 pp
−3.0 pp
−3.9 pp
−3.9 pp
−3.4 pp
−10.0 pp
−5.2 pp
−3.7 pp
−1.6 pp
+5.1 pp
+2.1 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.6 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

BRP Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 10 Recreational Vehicles companies compared here, at $307 million. THOR Industries, Inc. is next at $261 million. MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: BRP Inc. leads with $307 million of TTM profit, 17.6% above THOR Industries, Inc.. MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. shows ≥100% on the scoring scale growth from a $10 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderBRP Inc. · $307 million
Gap17.6% versus #2 · THOR Industries, Inc.
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/10 companies · 178 observations

Investor read: BRP Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1BRP Inc. DOO$307M
3LCI Industries LCII · older report$202M
5MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. MCFT · older report$10M
Profit growthfastest growers
1MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. MCFT · older report100%
2BRP Inc. DOO68%
3LCI Industries LCII · older report30%
Net profit · company comparison
6/10 level · 4/10 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
BRP Inc. DOO$127M-21%Jun 2026
THOR Industries, Inc. THO$96M-28%Jun 2026
LCI Industries LCII$63M29%Mar 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. PATK$39M2.6%Jun 2026
Harley-Davidson, Inc. HOG$24M-82%Jun 2026
Brunswick Corporation BC$21M-65%Sep 2026
Winnebago Industries, Inc. WGO$15M-17%Jun 2026
MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. MCFT$-1M-125%Mar 2026
Malibu Boats, Inc. MBUU$-2M-115%Mar 2026
Polaris Inc. PII$-47M-236%Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

BRP Inc. · DOO

$128M
$210M
$121M
$238M
$142M
$365M
$155M
$339M
$90M
$303M
$43M
$42M
$31M
$-51M
$161M
$57M
$77M
$46M
$127M

Brunswick Corporation · BC

$145M
$174M
$199M
$168M
$112M
$135M
$71M
$68M
$105M
$47M
$-71M
$20M
$60M
$-234M
$19M
$21M

Harley-Davidson, Inc. · HOG

$22M
$223M
$216M
$261M
$40M
$302M
$174M
$196M
$23M
$232M
$215M
$116M
$-118M
$131M
$106M
$375M
$-283M
$24M

LCI Industries · LCII

$82M
$196M
$155M
$61M
$-17M
$7M
$33M
$26M
$-2M
$37M
$61M
$36M
$10M
$49M
$58M
$62M
$19M
$63M

Malibu Boats, Inc. · MBUU

$31M
$55M
$50M
$36M
$36M
$53M
$-18M
$21M
$10M
$-68M
$-20M
$-5M
$2M
$13M
$5M
$-1M
$-3M
$-2M

MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. · MCFT

$12M
$18M
$24M
$25M
$20M
$23M
$9M
$6M
$0M
$1M
$0M
$4M
$5M
$4M
$2M
$-1M

Patrick Industries, Inc. · PATK

$61M
$113M
$117M
$59M
$40M
$30M
$42M
$40M
$35M
$48M
$41M
$15M
$38M
$32M
$35M
$29M
$39M

Polaris Inc. · PII

$128M
$74M
$142M
$191M
$197M
$114M
$134M
$152M
$103M
$4M
$69M
$28M
$11M
$-67M
$-79M
$-16M
$-15M
$-47M

THOR Industries, Inc. · THO

$245M
$266M
$346M
$282M
$137M
$26M
$120M
$91M
$55M
$5M
$114M
$91M
$-1M
$-3M
$134M
$127M
$23M
$15M
$96M

Winnebago Industries, Inc. · WGO

$100M
$91M
$117M
$83M
$60M
$53M
$59M
$44M
$26M
$-13M
$29M
$-29M
$-5M
$0M
$18M
$14M
$6M
$5M
$15M

Profit growth · reported quarter history

BRP Inc. · DOO

12%
11%
74%
28%
42%
-37%
-17%
-72%
-88%
-66%
-117%
274%
36%
148%
-21%

Brunswick Corporation · BC

11%
16%
-36%
-32%
-58%
-6.3%
-65%
-200%
-71%
-43%
-598%
-65%

Harley-Davidson, Inc. · HOG

4.9%
60%
82%
35%
-19%
-25%
-43%
-23%
24%
-41%
-613%
-44%
-51%
223%
-82%

LCI Industries · LCII

128%
-3.2%
-121%
-96%
-79%
-57%
429%
85%
38%
32%
-4.9%
72%
90%
29%

Malibu Boats, Inc. · MBUU

43%
29%
16%
-3.6%
-136%
-42%
-72%
-228%
-124%
-80%
-250%
-115%

MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. · MCFT

50%
108%
11%
-4.2%
-64%
-70%
-100%
-100%
-33%
300%
-125%

Patrick Industries, Inc. · PATK

98%
3.5%
-34%
-74%
-29%
0.0%
60%
-2.4%
-63%
8.6%
-33%
-15%
93%
2.6%

Polaris Inc. · PII

-8.4%
63%
54%
54%
-5.6%
-20%
-48%
-96%
-49%
-82%
-89%
-1,775%
-214%
-157%
-236%

THOR Industries, Inc. · THO

13%
-44%
-90%
-65%
-68%
-60%
-81%
-5.0%
0.0%
-102%
-160%
18%
40%
-28%

Winnebago Industries, Inc. · WGO

-1.2%
-40%
-42%
-50%
-47%
-57%
-125%
-51%
-166%
-119%
-38%
-17%
08 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

BRP Inc. has the highest ROCE among the 10 Recreational Vehicles companies compared here, at 5.6%. Polaris Inc. is next at 5%. Brunswick Corporation has the highest ROCE change at +8.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 10 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: BRP Inc. leads ROCE at 5.6%, 0.6 percentage points above Polaris Inc.. Brunswick Corporation has the strongest latest improvement at +8.5 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderBRP Inc. · 5.6%
Gap12% versus #2 · Polaris Inc.
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage10/10 companies · 182 observations

Investor read: BRP Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1BRP Inc. DOO5.6%
2Polaris Inc. PII5.0%
3LCI Industries LCII · older report3.5%
ROCE changefastest improvers
2Polaris Inc. PII+5.4 pp
3BRP Inc. DOO+3.3 pp
4LCI Industries LCII · older report+0.4 pp
5Harley-Davidson, Inc. HOG−0.1 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
10/10 level · 10/10 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
BRP Inc. DOO5.6%+3.3 ppJun 2026
Polaris Inc. PII5.0%+5.4 ppJun 2026
LCI Industries LCII3.5%+0.4 ppMar 2026
Brunswick Corporation BC3.1%+8.5 ppSep 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. PATK2.8%−0.5 ppJun 2026
THOR Industries, Inc. THO1.7%−1.5 ppJun 2026
Winnebago Industries, Inc. WGO1.3%−0.3 ppJun 2026
Harley-Davidson, Inc. HOG1.2%−0.1 ppJun 2026
Malibu Boats, Inc. MBUU-0.3%−3.1 ppMar 2026
MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. MCFT-0.7%−2.5 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

BRP Inc. · DOO

7.0%
14%
8.5%
14%
14%
14%
8.9%
11%
9.8%
8.0%
4.6%
2.9%
3.4%
2.6%
2.3%
2.2%
5.2%
0.3%
5.6%

Brunswick Corporation · BC

6.3%
6.3%
7.2%
5.5%
4.9%
4.0%
2.3%
2.3%
3.3%
2.1%
-1.3%
1.2%
2.2%
-5.4%
1.0%
1.2%
3.1%

Harley-Davidson, Inc. · HOG

-0.1%
3.7%
3.5%
4.2%
0.0%
4.5%
2.5%
2.3%
-0.3%
3.0%
2.6%
1.1%
-2.3%
1.8%
1.3%
5.9%
-5.3%
0.3%
1.2%

LCI Industries · LCII

5.0%
11%
8.6%
3.4%
-0.8%
0.7%
2.0%
1.7%
0.1%
2.2%
3.5%
2.1%
0.6%
3.1%
3.3%
2.7%
1.4%
3.5%

Malibu Boats, Inc. · MBUU

7.1%
12%
9.9%
7.9%
7.5%
11%
-3.2%
3.9%
2.0%
-11%
-3.8%
-0.8%
0.5%
2.8%
1.1%
-0.1%
-0.6%
-0.3%

MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. · MCFT

9.2%
13%
17%
16%
13%
13%
4.7%
2.8%
-0.2%
0.4%
0.1%
1.8%
2.7%
1.7%
1.4%
-0.7%

Patrick Industries, Inc. · PATK

5.1%
8.1%
7.8%
4.2%
2.9%
2.3%
3.1%
3.0%
2.3%
3.4%
2.9%
1.6%
2.4%
3.3%
2.4%
2.1%
2.3%
2.8%

Polaris Inc. · PII

5.8%
3.6%
6.9%
8.6%
9.0%
5.5%
6.6%
6.5%
4.4%
1.2%
3.5%
2.0%
1.9%
-1.1%
-0.4%
0.7%
-1.1%
-1.3%
5.0%

THOR Industries, Inc. · THO

6.5%
7.0%
9.2%
6.8%
3.7%
0.7%
3.2%
2.7%
1.9%
0.3%
2.9%
2.5%
0.2%
0.2%
3.2%
1.9%
0.7%
0.2%
1.7%

Winnebago Industries, Inc. · WGO

9.0%
8.1%
10%
7.0%
4.6%
4.0%
4.1%
2.9%
2.0%
1.7%
2.2%
-0.9%
0.0%
0.4%
1.6%
1.1%
0.7%
0.7%
1.3%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

BRP Inc. · DOO

+7.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.4 pp
−2.8 pp
−4.3 pp
−5.7 pp
−4.3 pp
−8.2 pp
−6.4 pp
−5.4 pp
−2.3 pp
−0.7 pp
+1.8 pp
−2.3 pp
+3.3 pp

Brunswick Corporation · BC

−0.8 pp
−1.4 pp
−3.2 pp
−3.2 pp
−1.6 pp
−1.9 pp
−3.6 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.1 pp
−7.5 pp
+2.3 pp
−1.0 pp
+8.5 pp

Harley-Davidson, Inc. · HOG

+0.1 pp
+0.8 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.9 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.5 pp
+0.1 pp
−1.2 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.2 pp
−1.3 pp
+4.8 pp
−3.0 pp
−1.5 pp
−0.1 pp

LCI Industries · LCII

−5.8 pp
−10.4 pp
−6.6 pp
−1.7 pp
+0.9 pp
+1.5 pp
+1.5 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.9 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.4 pp

Malibu Boats, Inc. · MBUU

+0.4 pp
−1.4 pp
−13.1 pp
−4.0 pp
−5.5 pp
−21.4 pp
−0.6 pp
−4.7 pp
−1.5 pp
+13.7 pp
+4.9 pp
+0.7 pp
−1.1 pp
−3.1 pp

MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. · MCFT

+6.6 pp
−0.5 pp
−3.5 pp
−11.1 pp
−9.8 pp
−13.4 pp
−4.6 pp
−1.0 pp
+2.9 pp
+1.3 pp
+1.3 pp
−2.5 pp

Patrick Industries, Inc. · PATK

−2.2 pp
−5.5 pp
−1.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+1.1 pp
−0.2 pp
−1.4 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.5 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.5 pp

Polaris Inc. · PII

+3.2 pp
+1.9 pp
−0.3 pp
−2.1 pp
−4.6 pp
−4.3 pp
−3.1 pp
−4.5 pp
−2.5 pp
−2.3 pp
−3.9 pp
−1.3 pp
−3.0 pp
−0.2 pp
+5.4 pp

THOR Industries, Inc. · THO

−2.8 pp
−6.3 pp
−6.0 pp
−4.1 pp
−1.8 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.2 pp
−1.7 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.6 pp
+0.5 pp
0.0 pp
−1.5 pp

Winnebago Industries, Inc. · WGO

−4.4 pp
−4.1 pp
−6.0 pp
−4.1 pp
−2.6 pp
−2.3 pp
−1.9 pp
−3.8 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.3 pp
−0.6 pp
+2.0 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.3 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

BRP Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 10 Recreational Vehicles companies compared here, at 0.29×. LCI Industries is next at 0.45×. Harley-Davidson, Inc. has the lowest P/E at 15×, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: BRP Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.29×, 35.6% below LCI Industries. Only 3 of 10 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderBRP Inc. · 0.29×
Gap35.6% versus #2 · LCI Industries
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/10 companies · 17 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
1BRP Inc. DOO0.3
2LCI Industries LCII · older report0.5
P/Elowest P/E
2LCI Industries LCII · older report15.0
Valuation · company comparison
3/10 level · 10/10 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
THOR Industries, Inc. THO0.816.0Jun 2026
Polaris Inc. PII0.756.9Jun 2026
LCI Industries LCII0.515.0Mar 2026
Malibu Boats, Inc. MBUU0.338.6Mar 2026
BRP Inc. DOO0.324.8Jun 2026
Harley-Davidson, Inc. HOG0.215.0Jun 2026
Brunswick Corporation BC84.2Sep 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. PATK22.6Jun 2026
Winnebago Industries, Inc. WGO21.8Jun 2026
MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. MCFT31.6Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

BRP Inc. · DOO

0.2
0.2
0.3

Harley-Davidson, Inc. · HOG

0.2
0.2

LCI Industries · LCII

1.4
0.3
1.3
0.5
0.5
0.5

Malibu Boats, Inc. · MBUU

0.3

Polaris Inc. · PII

0.7
0.7

THOR Industries, Inc. · THO

0.6
0.4
0.8

P/E · reported quarter history

BRP Inc. · DOO

11.2
11.4
13.1
11.6
10.5
10.4
9.2
9.8
6.7
7.2
12.3
30.5
12.5
25.1
33.2
32.3
26.0
24.8

Brunswick Corporation · BC

13.0
10.4
8.3
7.8
9.8
11.3
16.2
17.4
14.2
20.0
33.5
42.8
84.2

Harley-Davidson, Inc. · HOG

9.0
9.7
8.0
7.8
8.4
6.8
6.6
6.7
7.6
9.7
6.8
8.7
8.8
9.4
12.2
6.8
7.4
11.5
15.0

LCI Industries · LCII

13.8
6.5
5.8
5.2
5.0
13.6
37.8
60.5
49.9
33.5
21.7
23.5
18.5
14.3
15.2
13.2
16.0
15.0

Malibu Boats, Inc. · MBUU

11.7
8.5
7.0
6.1
6.5
6.9
11.6
11.3
17.6
41.2
33.1
38.6

MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. · MCFT

8.3
8.7
7.0
4.7
6.0
6.8
5.3
9.3
13.9
41.2
187.2
156.7
28.6
23.0
20.7
31.6

Patrick Industries, Inc. · PATK

8.2
5.2
3.7
3.0
4.5
6.4
10.1
10.3
17.7
15.6
20.4
20.2
20.1
25.1
29.6
27.8
27.5
22.6

Polaris Inc. · PII

14.0
15.1
22.7
17.0
13.6
13.3
11.3
10.2
10.9
14.7
13.7
23.3
29.6
56.9

THOR Industries, Inc. · THO

7.2
5.7
3.9
4.1
4.3
6.6
7.6
16.6
16.3
22.4
20.2
21.5
26.5
27.2
17.4
18.8
19.7
19.8
16.0

Winnebago Industries, Inc. · WGO

7.9
6.2
4.3
5.2
5.6
6.8
7.7
10.2
12.7
21.1
23.1
135.6
39.5
28.3
27.1
21.8
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Recreational Vehicles comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 3 of the 10 companies report on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so their ranks are marked stale. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 3 companies have older fundamental reporting dates than the sector’s freshest reporters; their ranks carry a stale marker.
11 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 10 Recreational Vehicles companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Sep 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Sep 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Recreational Vehicles company comparison FAQs

These 22 answers restate the Recreational Vehicles comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 10 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Sep 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Recreational Vehicles sector outperforming S&P 500?

Recreational Vehicles has underperformed S&P 500 by 3.9% over 52 weeks and 3.7% over 13 weeks. 2 of 10 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 10 beat the sector itself.

Which Recreational Vehicles company is largest by revenue?

THOR Industries, Inc. leads with revenue of $9,821 million, based on 6 of 10 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Which Recreational Vehicles company is growing fastest?

BRP Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 16%, across 6 of 10 comparable companies.

Which Recreational Vehicles company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

BRP Inc. ranks first at 71.8/100 with 81.1% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Recreational Vehicles company has the lowest comparable PEG?

BRP Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.29, among 3 of 10 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Recreational Vehicles comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Sep 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Which Recreational Vehicles company is the biggest?

THOR Industries, Inc. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $9,821 million, ahead of BRP Inc. at $8,987 million. That covers 6 of 10 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.

Which Recreational Vehicles company has the best profit margins?

BRP Inc. has the highest operating margin at 9.4%, from 10 of 10 comparable companies. BRP Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +4.3 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Recreational Vehicles company makes the most profit?

BRP Inc. earns the most, at $307 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 6 of 10 comparable companies. MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Recreational Vehicles company earns the highest return on capital?

BRP Inc. leads on return on capital employed at 5.6%, across 10 of 10 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Recreational Vehicles stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — BRP Inc. screens cheapest at 0.29×. Only 3 of 10 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Recreational Vehicles sector beating the market?

Recreational Vehicles has underperformed S&P 500 by 3.9% over the last 52 weeks and 3.7% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 2 of 10 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Recreational Vehicles stock has the strongest price momentum?

Polaris Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Recreational Vehicles company scores highest for research priority?

BRP Inc. scores 71.8 out of 100 with 81.1% evidence confidence, from 30 points on growth and earnings, 16.6 on capital efficiency, 14.8 on valuation and 10.4 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Recreational Vehicles companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 10 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Sep 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Recreational Vehicles sector?

The 10 Recreational Vehicles companies on this page carry $29,364 million of combined market value. Brunswick Corporation is the largest at $5,410 million, about 18% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.

What is the Recreational Vehicles sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 10 Recreational Vehicles companies on this page is 24.8×, measured on the 10 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.

How is the Recreational Vehicles sector performing?

2 of the 10 covered Recreational Vehicles companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 3.9% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.

How many Recreational Vehicles stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 10 listed Recreational Vehicles companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Sep 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI