Building Materials Stocks
Building Materials: Amrize AG owns the largest revenue base; James Hardie Industries plc has the fastest current growth.
How has Building Materials moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 10% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 5% on average over the last four reported quarters.
RS — · 4/14 >200d (−4) · 4/14 lead (+2) · EPS 5/14↑
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 14 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Is Building Materials outperforming S&P 500?
Building Materials has underperformed S&P 500 by 10% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 4%. 3 of 14 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Suncrete, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +30.8%.
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Building Materials has underperformed S&P 500 by 10% over 52 weeks and 4% over 13 weeks. 3 of 14 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 3 of 14 beat the sector itself. Amrize AG leads with revenue of $11,912 million, based on 5 of 14 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.CPAC | 65.4/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | TURNING | 23.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5.9 pp 45% evidence | 15.0/25 ROCE 5.8% · OPM 25.1% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 16.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.6/20 RS sector 20.9% · RS bench 12.9% · 1Y 90.1%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.8 + 15 + 11 + 15.6 = 65.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 2James Hardie Industries plcJHX | 57.2/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.8/35 Revenue 24.7% · PAT 34.5% · OPM change -9.8 pp 83% evidence | 18.0/25 ROCE 9.7% · OPM 58.6% 76% evidence | 4.1/20 P/E 99.7× · PEG 2.9 65% evidence | 16.3/20 RS sector 24.1% · RS bench 15.9% · 1Y 0.5%9 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 18 + 4.1 + 16.3 = 57.2 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 3Eagle Materials Inc.EXP | 52.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 16.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.7 pp 45% evidence | 13.4/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 17.7% 76% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 17.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.6/20 RS sector -4.4% · RS bench -10.7% · 1Y -4.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.9 + 13.4 + 10.6 + 11.6 = 52.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.USLM | 52.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 16.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3 pp 45% evidence | 16.7/25 ROCE 6.2% · OPM 40.7% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 22.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.1/20 RS sector -7.3% · RS bench -13.4% · 1Y 3.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.4 + 16.7 + 9.9 + 9.1 = 52.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Vulcan Materials CompanyVMC | 50.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 20.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.2 pp 45% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 15.1% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 34.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.9/20 RS sector -6.2% · RS bench -12.4% · 1Y -0.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.4 + 11.8 + 9 + 8.9 = 50.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Tecnoglass Inc.TGLS | 48.3/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 10.4/35 Revenue 9.8% · PAT -14.4% · OPM change -8.7 pp 83% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 5.1% · OPM 18% 76% evidence | 15.8/20 P/E 13.2× · PEG 0.86 65% evidence | 8.1/20 RS sector -14% · RS bench -19.7% · 1Y -37.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.4 + 14 + 15.8 + 8.1 = 48.3 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 7CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.CX | 47.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.4 pp 45% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 10.2% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 779.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.3/20 RS sector -0.7% · RS bench -7.3% · 1Y 34.7%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 8.3 + 8.5 + 8.3 = 47.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Titan America SATTAM | 44.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.7 pp 45% evidence | 11.9/25 ROCE 3.6% · OPM 12.5% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 19.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.0/20 RS sector -5.2% · RS bench -11.6% · 1Y 7.1%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.5 + 11.9 + 10.1 + 7 = 44.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.MLM | 41.6/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | BASING | 16.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.5 pp 32% evidence | 9.2/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 11.9% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 14.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.9/20 RS sector -12.8% · RS bench -18.6% · 1Y -9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.2 + 9.2 + 11.3 + 4.9 = 41.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 10CRH plcCRH | 39.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.8 pp 45% evidence | 10.2/25 ROCE 4.4% · OPM -0.5% 76% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 18.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.6/20 RS sector -16.5% · RS bench -22.1% · 1Y -9.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 10.2 + 10.3 + 1.6 = 39.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Amrize AGAMRZ | 35.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 13.6/35 Revenue 2.5% · PAT -6.4% · OPM change -2.7 pp 62% evidence | 4.7/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM -3.5% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 26.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -6.7% · RS bench -12.9% · 1Y 8.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.6 + 4.7 + 9.7 + 7.2 = 35.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Knife River CorporationKNF | 31.4/100Adverse evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.6/35 Revenue 9.6% · PAT -18.3% · OPM change 2.4 pp 62% evidence | 4.1/25 ROCE -2.5% · OPM -21% 76% evidence | 4.9/20 P/E 31.8× · PEG 2.79 65% evidence | 1.8/20 RS sector -14.5% · RS bench -20.2% · 1Y -21%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.6 + 4.1 + 4.9 + 1.8 = 31.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Smith-Midland CorporationSMID | 26.2/100Adverse evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 8.1/35 Revenue 7% · PAT 11.1% · OPM change -11.3 pp 83% evidence | 6.3/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM 8% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 16.4× · PEG 2.16 65% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -23.2% · RS bench -28.3% · 1Y -26.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.1 + 6.3 + 8.8 + 3 = 26.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Suncrete, Inc.RMIX | 53.8/100Thin evidence · provisional28% evidence | TURNING | 17.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 2% evidence | 10.6/25 ROCE — · OPM — 15% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 28.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.7/20 RS sector 30.8% · RS bench 22.6% · 1Y 64.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 10.6 + 9.4 + 16.7 = 53.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Market action
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. has the strongest one-year price move in Building Materials at +90.1%. Suncrete, Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +22.6%. 3 of 14 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.
Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Building Materials itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Amrize AG has the highest Revenue among the 14 Building Materials companies compared here, at $11,912 million. James Hardie Industries plc is next at $4,836 million. James Hardie Industries plc has the highest Revenue growth at 24.7%, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Amrize AG is the scale leader at $11,912 million, 146.3% ahead of James Hardie Industries plc. James Hardie Industries plc's growth is 24.7% from a $4,836 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
Investor read: Amrize AG is the scale benchmark; James Hardie Industries plc is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Amrize AG's growth falls below James Hardie Industries plc's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRH plc CRH | $7.4B | 9.1% | Jun 2026 |
| CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. CX | $4.0B | 11% | Jun 2026 |
| Amrize AG AMRZ | $2.2B | 4.7% | Mar 2026 |
| Vulcan Materials Company VMC | $1.8B | 7.4% | Jun 2026 |
| James Hardie Industries plc JHX | $1.4B | 44% | Mar 2026 |
| Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. MLM | $1.4B | 17% | Jun 2026 |
| Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. CPAC | $556M | 11% | Jun 2026 |
| Eagle Materials Inc. EXP | $479M | 1.9% | Jun 2026 |
| Knife River Corporation KNF | $410M | 16% | Mar 2026 |
| Titan America SA TTAM | $398M | 1.5% | Jun 2026 |
| Tecnoglass Inc. TGLS | $249M | 12% | Mar 2026 |
| United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. USLM | $88M | -3.3% | Jun 2026 |
| Smith-Midland Corporation SMID | $22M | -4.4% | Mar 2026 |
| Suncrete, Inc. RMIX | $-14M | -567% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. · CX
CRH plc · CRH
Eagle Materials Inc. · EXP
James Hardie Industries plc · JHX
Knife River Corporation · KNF
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. · MLM
Suncrete, Inc. · RMIX
Tecnoglass Inc. · TGLS
Titan America SA · TTAM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · USLM
Vulcan Materials Company · VMC
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amrize AG · AMRZ
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. · CX
CRH plc · CRH
Eagle Materials Inc. · EXP
James Hardie Industries plc · JHX
Knife River Corporation · KNF
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. · MLM
Suncrete, Inc. · RMIX
Tecnoglass Inc. · TGLS
Titan America SA · TTAM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · USLM
Vulcan Materials Company · VMC
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
James Hardie Industries plc has the highest OPM among the 14 Building Materials companies compared here, at 58.6%. United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. is next at 40.7%. Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. has the highest Margin change at +5.9 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its OPM series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: James Hardie Industries plc leads opm at 58.6%; Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. leads margin change at +5.9 percentage points.
Investor read: James Hardie Industries plc sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| James Hardie Industries plc JHX | 59% | −9.8 pp | Mar 2026 |
| United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. USLM | 41% | −3.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. CPAC | 25% | +5.9 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Tecnoglass Inc. TGLS | 18% | −8.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Eagle Materials Inc. EXP | 18% | −0.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Vulcan Materials Company VMC | 15% | +1.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Titan America SA TTAM | 13% | −0.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. MLM | 12% | −3.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
| CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. CX | 10% | +3.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Smith-Midland Corporation SMID | 8.0% | −11.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| CRH plc CRH | -0.5% | −0.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Amrize AG AMRZ | -3.5% | −2.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Knife River Corporation KNF | -21% | +2.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amrize AG · AMRZ
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. · CPAC
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. · CX
CRH plc · CRH
Eagle Materials Inc. · EXP
James Hardie Industries plc · JHX
Knife River Corporation · KNF
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. · MLM
Tecnoglass Inc. · TGLS
Titan America SA · TTAM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · USLM
Vulcan Materials Company · VMC
Margin change · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amrize AG · AMRZ
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. · CPAC
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. · CX
CRH plc · CRH
Eagle Materials Inc. · EXP
James Hardie Industries plc · JHX
Knife River Corporation · KNF
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. · MLM
Tecnoglass Inc. · TGLS
Titan America SA · TTAM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · USLM
Vulcan Materials Company · VMC
Profit Scale & Acceleration
James Hardie Industries plc has the highest Net profit among the 14 Building Materials companies compared here, at $2,704 million. Amrize AG is next at $1,151 million. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at 34.5%. 5 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: James Hardie Industries plc leads with $2,704 million of TTM profit, 134.9% above Amrize AG. James Hardie Industries plc shows 34.5% growth from a $2,704 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
Investor read: James Hardie Industries plc sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| James Hardie Industries plc JHX | $867M | 33% | Mar 2026 |
| CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. CX | $231M | 86% | Jun 2026 |
| Vulcan Materials Company VMC | $167M | 28% | Jun 2026 |
| Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. CPAC | $82M | 55% | Jun 2026 |
| Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. MLM | $79M | -24% | Jun 2026 |
| Eagle Materials Inc. EXP | $60M | -9.1% | Jun 2026 |
| Titan America SA TTAM | $33M | 0.0% | Jun 2026 |
| Tecnoglass Inc. TGLS | $32M | -24% | Mar 2026 |
| United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. USLM | $31M | -8.8% | Jun 2026 |
| Smith-Midland Corporation SMID | $1M | -67% | Mar 2026 |
| Suncrete, Inc. RMIX | $-17M | -950% | Mar 2026 |
| Knife River Corporation KNF | $-79M | 39% | Mar 2026 |
| Amrize AG AMRZ | $-118M | 2.1% | Mar 2026 |
| CRH plc CRH | $-224M | 48% | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amrize AG · AMRZ
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. · CX
CRH plc · CRH
Eagle Materials Inc. · EXP
James Hardie Industries plc · JHX
Knife River Corporation · KNF
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. · MLM
Suncrete, Inc. · RMIX
Tecnoglass Inc. · TGLS
Titan America SA · TTAM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · USLM
Vulcan Materials Company · VMC
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amrize AG · AMRZ
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. · CX
CRH plc · CRH
Eagle Materials Inc. · EXP
James Hardie Industries plc · JHX
Knife River Corporation · KNF
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. · MLM
Suncrete, Inc. · RMIX
Tecnoglass Inc. · TGLS
Titan America SA · TTAM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · USLM
Vulcan Materials Company · VMC
Return On Capital Employed
James Hardie Industries plc has the highest ROCE among the 14 Building Materials companies compared here, at 9.7%. United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. is next at 6.2%. Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. has the highest ROCE change at +2.2 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its ROCE series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: James Hardie Industries plc leads ROCE at 9.7%, 3.5 percentage points above United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.. Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. has the strongest latest improvement at +2.2 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
Investor read: James Hardie Industries plc sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| James Hardie Industries plc JHX | 9.7% | −5.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. USLM | 6.2% | −0.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. CPAC | 5.8% | +2.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Tecnoglass Inc. TGLS | 5.1% | −2.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| CRH plc CRH | 4.4% | −0.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Eagle Materials Inc. EXP | 4.2% | −1.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Titan America SA TTAM | 3.6% | −5.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Vulcan Materials Company VMC | 3.0% | −0.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. CX | 2.9% | +1.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Smith-Midland Corporation SMID | 2.6% | −5.8 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. MLM | 2.0% | −0.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Amrize AG AMRZ | -0.4% | −0.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Knife River Corporation KNF | -2.5% | +0.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amrize AG · AMRZ
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. · CPAC
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. · CX
CRH plc · CRH
Eagle Materials Inc. · EXP
James Hardie Industries plc · JHX
Knife River Corporation · KNF
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. · MLM
Tecnoglass Inc. · TGLS
Titan America SA · TTAM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · USLM
Vulcan Materials Company · VMC
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amrize AG · AMRZ
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. · CPAC
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. · CX
CRH plc · CRH
Eagle Materials Inc. · EXP
James Hardie Industries plc · JHX
Knife River Corporation · KNF
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. · MLM
Tecnoglass Inc. · TGLS
Titan America SA · TTAM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · USLM
Vulcan Materials Company · VMC
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
Tecnoglass Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 14 Building Materials companies compared here, at 0.86×. Smith-Midland Corporation is next at 2.16×. The same company also holds the lowest P/E, at 13.2×. 4 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026. Its PEG series carries 4 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Tecnoglass Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.86×, 60.2% below Smith-Midland Corporation. Only 4 of 14 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. USLM | 3.6 | 22.4 | Jun 2026 |
| James Hardie Industries plc JHX | 2.9 | 99.7 | Mar 2026 |
| Knife River Corporation KNF | 2.8 | 31.8 | Mar 2026 |
| Eagle Materials Inc. EXP | 2.6 | 17.8 | Jun 2026 |
| CRH plc CRH | 2.4 | 18.9 | Jun 2026 |
| Titan America SA TTAM | 2.2 | 19.4 | Jun 2026 |
| Smith-Midland Corporation SMID | 2.2 | 16.4 | Mar 2026 |
| Vulcan Materials Company VMC | 1.7 | 34.8 | Jun 2026 |
| Tecnoglass Inc. TGLS | 0.9 | 13.2 | Mar 2026 |
| Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. MLM | 0.7 | 14.2 | Jun 2026 |
| Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. CPAC | 0.5 | 16.3 | Jun 2026 |
| Amrize AG AMRZ | — | 26.8 | Mar 2026 |
| CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. CX | — | 779.2 | Jun 2026 |
| Suncrete, Inc. RMIX | — | 28.3 | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. · CPAC
CRH plc · CRH
Eagle Materials Inc. · EXP
James Hardie Industries plc · JHX
Knife River Corporation · KNF
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. · MLM
Smith-Midland Corporation · SMID
Tecnoglass Inc. · TGLS
Titan America SA · TTAM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · USLM
Vulcan Materials Company · VMC
P/E · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amrize AG · AMRZ
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. · CX
CRH plc · CRH
Eagle Materials Inc. · EXP
James Hardie Industries plc · JHX
Knife River Corporation · KNF
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. · MLM
Suncrete, Inc. · RMIX
Tecnoglass Inc. · TGLS
Titan America SA · TTAM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · USLM
Vulcan Materials Company · VMC
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Building Materials comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 14 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 14 Building Materials companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
Building Materials company comparison FAQs
These 22 answers restate the Building Materials comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 14 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Building Materials sector outperforming S&P 500?
Building Materials has underperformed S&P 500 by 10% over 52 weeks and 4% over 13 weeks. 3 of 14 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 3 of 14 beat the sector itself.
Which Building Materials company is largest by revenue?
Amrize AG leads with revenue of $11,912 million, based on 5 of 14 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Building Materials company is growing fastest?
James Hardie Industries plc has the fastest current revenue growth at 24.7%, across 5 of 14 comparable companies.
Which Building Materials company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. ranks first at 65.4/100 with 51.8% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Building Materials company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Tecnoglass Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.86, among 4 of 14 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Building Materials comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Which Building Materials company is the biggest?
Amrize AG is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $11,912 million, ahead of James Hardie Industries plc at $4,836 million. That covers 5 of 14 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Building Materials company has the best profit margins?
James Hardie Industries plc has the highest operating margin at 58.6%, from 13 of 14 comparable companies. Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +5.9 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Building Materials company makes the most profit?
James Hardie Industries plc earns the most, at $2,704 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 5 of 14 comparable companies. James Hardie Industries plc has the fastest profit growth at 34.5%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Building Materials company earns the highest return on capital?
James Hardie Industries plc leads on return on capital employed at 9.7%, across 13 of 14 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Building Materials stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Tecnoglass Inc. screens cheapest at 0.86×. Only 4 of 14 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Building Materials sector beating the market?
Building Materials has underperformed S&P 500 by 10% over the last 52 weeks and 4% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 3 of 14 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Building Materials stock has the strongest price momentum?
Suncrete, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Building Materials company scores highest for research priority?
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. scores 65.4 out of 100 with 51.8% evidence confidence, from 23.8 points on growth and earnings, 15 on capital efficiency, 11 on valuation and 15.6 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Building Materials companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 14 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Building Materials sector?
The 14 Building Materials companies on this page carry $219,210 million of combined market value. CRH plc is the largest at $65,757 million, about 30% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.
What is the Building Materials sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 14 Building Materials companies on this page is 22.4×, measured on the 14 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.
How is the Building Materials sector performing?
3 of the 14 covered Building Materials companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 10% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.
How many Building Materials stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 14 listed Building Materials companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.