Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
₹243 Cr
₹251 Cr
₹277 Cr
₹306 Cr
₹283 Cr
₹234 Cr
₹256 Cr
₹278 Cr
₹279 Cr
₹257 Cr
₹311 Cr
₹337 Cr
₹351 Cr
₹355 Cr
₹349 Cr
₹376 Cr
₹337 Cr
₹331 Cr
₹398 Cr
—
20-quarter listed-company comparison
Rubber Processing/Rubber Products Stocks in India
Rubber Processing/Rubber Products: Apcotex Industries Ltd owns the largest revenue base; Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd has the fastest current growth.
01 · the index people search for
Nifty Rubber Processing/Rubber Products Index — Constituents & Performance
The Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies below are the listed Indian Rubber Processing/Rubber Products universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Rubber Processing/Rubber Products index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.
02 · the sector itself · before any single company
How has Rubber Processing/Rubber Products moved against NIFTY 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 8% behind NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies fell 12% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of NIFTY 500 on a rolling three-month view for 22 weeks running.
LEADER · ahead 22w⚠Moving with the index4 of 4 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months
RS ↑22w · 4/4 >200d (+1) · 4/4 lead (+1) · EPS 1/3↑
Rubber Processing/Rubber Products, equal-weighted, based at 200
NIFTY 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Rubber Processing/Rubber Products, equal-weighted, based at 200
NIFTY 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Rubber Processing/Rubber Products, equal-weighted, based at 200
NIFTY 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 4 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
03 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks
Is Rubber Processing/Rubber Products outperforming NIFTY 500?
Rubber Processing/Rubber Products has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 18.7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 29.6%. 4 of 4 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Apcotex Industries Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +13.9%. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.
+29.6%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
+18.7%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
4/4Stocks leading NIFTY 500
2/4Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: 28.1 as of 2026-07-19 · CONSOLIDATION · falling.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Rubber Processing/Rubber Products has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 18.7% over 52 weeks and 29.6% over 13 weeks. 4 of 4 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 2 of 4 beat the sector itself. Apcotex Industries Ltd leads with revenue of ₹1,442 crore, based on 4 of 4 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Companies
4
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹8.6K Cr
Apcotex Industries Ltd
Revenue growing
3/4
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
4/4
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 4 of 4
04 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 84% evidence confidence.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure LtdTINNARUBR | 75.2/100Favorable setup84% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 26.6/35 Revenue 14.4% · PAT 43.2% · OPM change 6 pp 95% evidence | 19.6/25 ROCE 22.3% · OPM 22% 95% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 32.6× · PEG — 35% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 5.6% · RS bench 34.8% · 1Y 20.3%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.6 + 19.6 + 9 + 20 = 75.2 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Apcotex Industries LtdAPCOTEXIND | 70.3/100Favorable setup80% evidence | LEADER | 26.9/35 Revenue 3.6% · PAT 83.6% · OPM change 2.7 pp 83% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 19.8% · OPM 10.8% 95% evidence | 7.0/20 P/E 84.5× · PEG — 35% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 13.9% · RS bench 44.8% · 1Y 54.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.9 + 16.4 + 7 + 20 = 70.3 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 3Pix Transmission LtdPIXTRANS | 45.8/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence | LEADER | 4.8/35 Revenue -1.7% · PAT -5.3% · OPM change -3 pp 88% evidence | 23.2/25 ROCE 21.7% · OPM 18% 100% evidence | 12.8/20 P/E 21.4× · PEG 0.34 85% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -14% · RS bench 10.1% · 1Y 11%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.8 + 23.2 + 12.8 + 5 = 45.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4GRP LtdGRPLTD | 34.6/100Adverse evidence78% evidence | TURNING | 10.9/35 Revenue 3.7% · PAT -79.8% · OPM change 2.8 pp 95% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE 6.9% · OPM 10.8% 95% evidence | 6.7/20 P/E 163× · PEG — 35% evidence | 9.7/20 RS sector -3.1% · RS bench 7.6% · 1Y -13.4%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.9 + 7.3 + 6.7 + 9.7 = 34.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
05 · what price has already done
Market action
Apcotex Industries Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Rubber Processing/Rubber Products at +54.5%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +44.8%. 4 of 4 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-31.
Price and relative strength
Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind NIFTY 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS NIFTY 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Rubber Processing/Rubber Products itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
06 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Apcotex Industries Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies compared here, at ₹1,442 crore. Pix Transmission Ltd is next at ₹583 crore. Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at 14.4%, so level and change sit with different companies. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Apcotex Industries Ltd is the scale leader at ₹1,442 crore, 147.3% ahead of Pix Transmission Ltd. Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd's growth is 14.4% from a ₹572 crore base, with 15 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderApcotex Industries Ltd · ₹1,442 crore
Gap147.3% versus #2 · Pix Transmission Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 68 observations
Investor read: Apcotex Industries Ltd is the scale benchmark; Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Apcotex Industries Ltd's growth falls below Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
Revenue growthfastest growers
Revenue · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified | ₹398 Cr | 14% | Mar 2026 |
| Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS | ₹171 Cr | 4.9% | Mar 2026 |
| GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified | ₹157 Cr | 27% | Jun 2026 |
| Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified | ₹156 Cr | 20% | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
₹114 Cr
₹96 Cr
₹99 Cr
₹114 Cr
₹110 Cr
₹138 Cr
₹126 Cr
₹132 Cr
₹132 Cr
₹160 Cr
₹124 Cr
₹132 Cr
₹135 Cr
₹145 Cr
₹157 Cr
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
₹122 Cr
₹114 Cr
₹110 Cr
₹120 Cr
₹119 Cr
₹112 Cr
₹134 Cr
₹112 Cr
₹124 Cr
₹128 Cr
₹129 Cr
₹130 Cr
₹160 Cr
₹140 Cr
₹163 Cr
₹122 Cr
₹139 Cr
₹151 Cr
₹171 Cr
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
₹75 Cr
₹73 Cr
₹80 Cr
₹80 Cr
₹93 Cr
₹110 Cr
₹136 Cr
₹118 Cr
₹123 Cr
₹129 Cr
₹130 Cr
₹120 Cr
₹139 Cr
₹157 Cr
₹156 Cr
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
—
—
—
65%
16%
-6.8%
-7.6%
-9.2%
-1.4%
9.8%
21%
21%
26%
38%
12%
12%
-4.0%
-6.8%
14%
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-4.0%
44%
27%
15%
21%
16%
-1.9%
0.5%
1.9%
-9.9%
27%
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
—
—
—
17%
-2.5%
-1.8%
22%
-6.7%
4.2%
14%
-3.7%
16%
29%
9.4%
26%
-6.2%
-13%
7.9%
4.9%
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
24%
51%
70%
48%
32%
17%
-4.4%
1.7%
13%
22%
20%
07 · compare level, then change
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd has the highest OPM among the 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies compared here, at 22%. Pix Transmission Ltd is next at 18%. The same company also holds the highest Margin change, at +6 percentage points. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd leads both opm at 22% and margin change at +6 percentage points.
LeaderTinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · 22%
Gap22.2% versus #2 · Pix Transmission Ltd
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 78 observations
Investor read: Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
Margin changefastest expanders
Operating margin · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified | 22% | +6.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS | 18% | −3.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified | 11% | +2.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified | 11% | +2.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
12%
12%
15%
15%
15%
12%
12%
6.5%
8.5%
6.7%
7.6%
6.5%
4.8%
4.6%
8.1%
7.3%
8.5%
9.4%
11%
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
5.4%
6.0%
7.2%
4.9%
5.1%
6.0%
6.1%
6.6%
9.7%
9.5%
16%
10%
7.4%
9.6%
20%
8.0%
8.0%
8.0%
6.2%
11%
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
27%
26%
22%
21%
20%
20%
24%
23%
25%
25%
24%
27%
32%
24%
21%
23%
25%
29%
18%
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
18%
13%
15%
14%
14%
11%
10%
15%
16%
17%
20%
18%
16%
12%
14%
16%
18%
16%
18%
22%
Margin change · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
—
—
—
+0.6 pp
+3.1 pp
−0.6 pp
−3.6 pp
−8.1 pp
−6.1 pp
−4.8 pp
−4.2 pp
0.0 pp
−3.7 pp
−2.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.8 pp
+3.7 pp
+4.8 pp
+2.7 pp
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
−1.6 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.3 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.0 pp
−1.1 pp
+1.6 pp
+4.6 pp
+3.5 pp
+10.4 pp
+3.6 pp
−2.2 pp
+0.1 pp
+4.0 pp
−2.1 pp
+0.6 pp
−1.6 pp
−14.3 pp
+2.8 pp
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
−4.8 pp
−1.4 pp
−6.6 pp
−5.7 pp
−7.1 pp
−5.8 pp
+1.5 pp
+2.1 pp
+4.9 pp
+5.0 pp
0.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+7.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−3.0 pp
−4.0 pp
−7.0 pp
+5.0 pp
−3.0 pp
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
+4.0 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.9 pp
−3.9 pp
−3.6 pp
−2.5 pp
−5.0 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.8 pp
+6.0 pp
+10.0 pp
+3.0 pp
0.0 pp
−5.0 pp
−6.0 pp
−2.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+6.0 pp
08 · compare level, then change
Profit Scale & Acceleration
Pix Transmission Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies compared here, at ₹107 crore. Apcotex Industries Ltd is next at ₹101 crore. Apcotex Industries Ltd has the highest Profit growth at 83.6%, so level and change sit with different companies. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Pix Transmission Ltd leads with ₹107 crore of TTM profit, 5.9% above Apcotex Industries Ltd. Apcotex Industries Ltd shows 83.6% growth from a ₹101 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderPix Transmission Ltd · ₹107 crore
Gap5.9% versus #2 · Apcotex Industries Ltd
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 68 observations
Investor read: Pix Transmission Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
Profit growthfastest growers
Net profit · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified | ₹35 Cr | 106% | Mar 2026 |
| Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified | ₹21 Cr | 75% | Jun 2026 |
| Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS | ₹20 Cr | -13% | Mar 2026 |
| GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified | ₹4 Cr | 140% | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
₹22 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹34 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹35 Cr
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
₹4 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹5 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹-1 Cr
₹4 Cr
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
₹20 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹41 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹35 Cr
₹20 Cr
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
₹5 Cr
₹7 Cr
₹7 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹21 Cr
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
—
—
—
55%
41%
-17%
-26%
-65%
-52%
-45%
-35%
25%
-27%
9.1%
13%
27%
127%
83%
106%
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9.1%
324%
122%
-46%
1.6%
67%
-60%
-22%
-81%
-107%
140%
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
—
—
—
13%
-20%
-29%
27%
-11%
31%
83%
26%
69%
95%
0.0%
-4.2%
3.7%
-41%
59%
-13%
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
100%
129%
129%
50%
-20%
-25%
-25%
0.0%
63%
42%
75%
09 · compare level, then change
Return On Capital Employed
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies compared here, at 22.3%. Pix Transmission Ltd is next at 21.7%. Apcotex Industries Ltd has the highest ROCE change at +6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd leads ROCE at 22.3%, 0.6 percentage points above Pix Transmission Ltd. Apcotex Industries Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +6 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderTinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · 22.3%
Gap2.8% versus #2 · Pix Transmission Ltd
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 57 observations
Investor read: Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
ROCE changefastest improvers
Return on capital · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified | 31% | −0.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified | 19% | +6.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS | 17% | −4.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified | 11% | −11.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
27%
—
29%
—
28%
—
23%
—
16%
—
13%
—
12%
—
13%
—
15%
—
19%
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
5.6%
—
2.8%
—
3.4%
—
4.5%
—
7.9%
14%
17%
22%
18%
21%
19%
22%
16%
19%
9.1%
11%
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
25%
—
21%
—
18%
—
14%
—
15%
22%
19%
24%
21%
27%
21%
25%
17%
22%
17%
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
20%
—
25%
—
26%
—
23%
—
25%
38%
31%
47%
36%
46%
26%
32%
20%
28%
23%
31%
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
+1.0 pp
—
−5.8 pp
—
−12.8 pp
—
−10.3 pp
—
−3.5 pp
—
+0.2 pp
—
+3.1 pp
—
+6.0 pp
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
−2.2 pp
—
+1.7 pp
—
+4.5 pp
—
+12.2 pp
—
+10.1 pp
+7.7 pp
+2.7 pp
+0.6 pp
−2.2 pp
−2.0 pp
−10.3 pp
−11.6 pp
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
—
—
—
—
−7.2 pp
—
−6.6 pp
—
−2.7 pp
—
+4.5 pp
—
+6.1 pp
+4.9 pp
+2.5 pp
+0.9 pp
−4.5 pp
−5.0 pp
−4.2 pp
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
+5.9 pp
—
−1.7 pp
—
−0.7 pp
—
+8.1 pp
—
+11.1 pp
+8.1 pp
−4.8 pp
−15.1 pp
−16.5 pp
−18.0 pp
−3.5 pp
−0.6 pp
10 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
Pix Transmission Ltd has the lowest PEG among the 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies compared here, at 0.34×. The same company also holds the lowest P/E, at 21.4×. 1 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026. Its PEG series carries 4 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Pix Transmission Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.34×. Only 1 of 4 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderPix Transmission Ltd · 0.34×
GapNot enough peers
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage1/4 companies · 4 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
P/Elowest P/E
Valuation · company comparison
1/4 level · 4/4 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS | 0.3 | 18.1 | Mar 2026 |
| Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified | — | 45.8 | Mar 2026 |
| Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified | — | 31.5 | Jun 2026 |
| GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified | — | 40.1 | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
—
—
—
2.3
—
—
—
—
0.9
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.5
0.3
—
—
P/E · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
55.8
49.6
51.1
83.1
77.9
64.4
67.3
73.4
70.4
70.4
60.5
60.1
59.7
51.4
46.1
54.4
54.3
51.5
45.8
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
19.1
14.9
22.0
30.1
31.8
26.3
26.2
34.9
35.3
47.6
62.9
69.7
64.5
67.7
60.0
48.8
41.0
32.8
38.5
40.1
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
14.2
15.1
15.1
16.2
17.1
17.6
16.9
19.4
25.7
26.2
23.5
22.7
22.5
28.9
19.4
19.2
17.3
20.1
18.1
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
11.7
14.4
18.2
15.9
23.2
21.1
14.8
20.7
33.6
37.2
38.1
83.8
52.2
43.6
30.5
32.9
36.1
31.7
20.9
31.5
11 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Rubber Processing/Rubber Products comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 4 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 3 draw at least one figure from a second feed with too little overlap to cross-check. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- 3 companies draw at least one figure from a second data feed with too little overlapping history to cross-check against the primary source; they are marked unverified wherever those figures appear.
- Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
12 · evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-31. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-31 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing1 cross-checked · 3 unverified · 0 withheld, of 4 graded companies.
How a second data feed is admitted, and what happens when it disagrees
A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from.
13 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers
Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company comparison FAQs
These 23 answers restate the Rubber Processing/Rubber Products comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 4 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-31. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Rubber Processing/Rubber Products sector outperforming NIFTY 500?
Rubber Processing/Rubber Products has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 18.7% over 52 weeks and 29.6% over 13 weeks. 4 of 4 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 2 of 4 beat the sector itself.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company is largest by revenue?
Apcotex Industries Ltd leads with revenue of ₹1,442 crore, based on 4 of 4 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company is growing fastest?
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 14.4%, across 4 of 4 comparable companies.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd ranks first at 75.2/100 with 84% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Pix Transmission Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.34, among 1 of 4 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Rubber Processing/Rubber Products comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
What is the Nifty Rubber Processing/Rubber Products index?
The Nifty Rubber Processing/Rubber Products index tracks India's listed Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 4 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Rubber Processing/Rubber Products sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Jun 2026.
Which are the best Rubber Processing/Rubber Products stocks in India?
Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd places first among 4 listed Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies, followed by Apcotex Industries Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.
How many Rubber Processing/Rubber Products stocks are listed in India?
This comparison covers 4 listed Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company is the biggest?
Apcotex Industries Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹1,442 crore, ahead of Pix Transmission Ltd at ₹583 crore. That covers 4 of 4 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company has the best profit margins?
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd has the highest operating margin at 22%, from 4 of 4 comparable companies. Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +6 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company makes the most profit?
Pix Transmission Ltd earns the most, at ₹107 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 4 of 4 comparable companies. Apcotex Industries Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 83.6%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company earns the highest return on capital?
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 22.3%, across 4 of 4 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Pix Transmission Ltd screens cheapest at 0.34×. Only 1 of 4 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Rubber Processing/Rubber Products sector beating the market?
Rubber Processing/Rubber Products has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 18.7% over the last 52 weeks and 29.6% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 4 of 4 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products stock has the strongest price momentum?
Apcotex Industries Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company scores highest for research priority?
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd scores 75.2 out of 100 with 84% evidence confidence, from 26.6 points on growth and earnings, 19.6 on capital efficiency, 9 on valuation and 20 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 4 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Rubber Processing/Rubber Products sector?
The 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies on this page carry ₹8,577 crore of combined market value. Apcotex Industries Ltd is the largest at ₹3,170 crore, about 37% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-05.
How is the Rubber Processing/Rubber Products sector performing?
4 of the 4 covered Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 18.7% ahead of NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-05.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.