Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-05
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Facility Management Stocks in India

Facility Management: SIS Ltd owns the largest revenue base AND the fastest current growth.

01 · the index people search for

Nifty Facility Management Index — Constituents & Performance

The Facility Management companies below are the listed Indian Facility Management universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Facility Management index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.

02 · the sector itself · before any single company

How has Facility Management moved against NIFTY 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 13% behind NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 3% on average over the last four reported quarters — close to flat. It has been ahead of NIFTY 500 on a rolling three-month view for 15 weeks running.

FADING · −1 in 4wMoving with the index3 of 4 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS ↑15w · 4/4 >200d (+0) · 3/4 lead (−1) · EPS 3/4↑

20020262025202420232022 161333 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Sep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 90, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 84, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 84, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 88, against 100 at the start · down 31.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 87, against 100 at the start · down 17.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 52, against 100 at the start · down 83.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 53, against 100 at the start · down 23.3% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 55, against 100 at the start · down 25.3% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 59, against 100 at the start · down 45.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 93, against 100 at the start · up 105.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two93 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
20020262025202420232022 161333 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Sep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 90, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 84, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 84, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 88, against 100 at the start · down 31.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 87, against 100 at the start · down 17.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 52, against 100 at the start · down 83.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 53, against 100 at the start · down 23.3% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 55, against 100 at the start · down 25.3% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 59, against 100 at the start · down 45.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 93, against 100 at the start · up 105.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two93No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
Facility Management, equal-weighted, based at 200 NIFTY 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 4 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

03 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Facility Management outperforming NIFTY 500?

Facility Management has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 5.1% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 25.5%. 3 of 4 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is broad. Quess Corp Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +23.1%. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.

+25.5%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
-5.1%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
3/4Stocks leading NIFTY 500
3/4Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: 38.7 as of 2026-07-19 · NARROWING · rising.

The central tension: current leadership is concentrated, so durability matters more than rank.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Facility Management has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 5.1% over 52 weeks and 25.5% over 13 weeks. 3 of 4 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 3 of 4 beat the sector itself. SIS Ltd leads with revenue of ₹15,981 crore, based on 4 of 4 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Companies
4
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹13.1K Cr
SIS Ltd
Revenue growing
4/4
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
3/4
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 4 of 4
04 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Quess Corp Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 79.3% evidence confidence.
Krystal Integrated Services Ltd has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Quess Corp LtdQUESS 73.1/100Favorable setup79% evidence LEADER 25.0/35 Revenue 5.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0.1 pp 95% evidence 17.7/25 ROCE 23% · OPM 2% 76% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 19.2× · PEG — 35% evidence 20.0/20 RS sector 23.1% · RS bench 43.4% · 1Y 10%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25 + 17.7 + 10.4 + 20 = 73.1 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2SIS LtdSIS 55.5/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence LEADER 18.9/35 Revenue 21.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change -0.2 pp 62% evidence 9.8/25 ROCE 13.7% · OPM 4.6% 95% evidence 16.4/20 P/E 17.3× · PEG 0.21 85% evidence 10.4/20 RS sector 1% · RS bench 18.2% · 1Y 11.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.9 + 9.8 + 16.4 + 10.4 = 55.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Krystal Integrated Services LtdKRYSTAL 51.5/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence ASLEEP 12.9/35 Revenue 5.4% · PAT 3.2% · OPM change 1 pp 83% evidence 14.2/25 ROCE 15.9% · OPM 7% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E 13× · PEG — 0% evidence 14.4/20 RS sector 18.5% · RS bench -0.1% · 1Y -7.2%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.9 + 14.2 + 10 + 14.4 = 51.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is -0.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
4Updater Services LtdUDS 39.1/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence TURNING 11.1/35 Revenue 7.9% · PAT -31.1% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence 10.1/25 ROCE 10% · OPM 6% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E 14.9× · PEG — 0% evidence 7.9/20 RS sector -23.3% · RS bench 4.8% · 1Y -27.7%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 11.1 + 10.1 + 10 + 7.9 = 39.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
05 · what price has already done

Market action

SIS Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Facility Management at +11.1%. Quess Corp Ltd leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +43.4%. 3 of 4 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-31.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

06 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

SIS Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 4 Facility Management companies compared here, at ₹15,981 crore. Quess Corp Ltd is next at ₹15,836 crore. The same company also holds the highest Revenue growth, at 21.2%. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026. Its Revenue series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: SIS Ltd is the scale leader at ₹15,981 crore, 0.9% ahead of Quess Corp Ltd. SIS Ltd's growth is 21.2% from a ₹15,981 crore base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderSIS Ltd · ₹15,981 crore
Gap0.9% versus #2 · Quess Corp Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 63 observations

Investor read: SIS Ltd is the scale benchmark; SIS Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: SIS Ltd's growth falls below SIS Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1SIS Ltd SIS₹16.0K Cr
2Quess Corp Ltd QUESS₹15.8K Cr
3Updater Services Ltd UDS⚠ unverified₹3.0K Cr
4Krystal Integrated Services Ltd KRYSTAL⚠ unverified₹1.3K Cr
Revenue growthfastest growers
1SIS Ltd SIS21%
2Updater Services Ltd UDS⚠ unverified7.9%
3Krystal Integrated Services Ltd KRYSTAL⚠ unverified5.4%
4Quess Corp Ltd QUESS5.4%
Revenue · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
SIS Ltd SIS₹4.5K Cr31%Mar 2026
Quess Corp Ltd QUESS₹4.2K Cr15%Jun 2026
Updater Services Ltd UDS⚠ unverified₹764 Cr9.1%Jun 2026
Krystal Integrated Services Ltd KRYSTAL⚠ unverified₹365 Cr-12%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Krystal Integrated Services Ltd · KRYSTAL⚠ unverified

₹191 Cr
₹192 Cr
₹217 Cr
₹235 Cr
₹283 Cr
₹292 Cr
₹257 Cr
₹266 Cr
₹276 Cr
₹413 Cr
₹323 Cr
₹283 Cr
₹306 Cr
₹365 Cr

Quess Corp Ltd · QUESS

₹4.5K Cr
₹4.4K Cr
₹4.6K Cr
₹4.7K Cr
₹4.8K Cr
₹3.5K Cr
₹3.6K Cr
₹3.7K Cr
₹4.0K Cr
₹3.7K Cr
₹3.7K Cr
₹3.8K Cr
₹3.9K Cr
₹3.9K Cr
₹4.2K Cr

SIS Ltd · SIS

₹2.4K Cr
₹2.6K Cr
₹2.6K Cr
₹2.7K Cr
₹2.8K Cr
₹2.9K Cr
₹3.0K Cr
₹3.0K Cr
₹3.1K Cr
₹3.1K Cr
₹3.1K Cr
₹3.1K Cr
₹3.3K Cr
₹3.4K Cr
₹3.4K Cr
₹3.5K Cr
₹3.8K Cr
₹4.2K Cr
₹4.5K Cr

Updater Services Ltd · UDS⚠ unverified

₹542 Cr
₹572 Cr
₹578 Cr
₹600 Cr
₹636 Cr
₹632 Cr
₹652 Cr
₹680 Cr
₹695 Cr
₹709 Cr
₹700 Cr
₹729 Cr
₹767 Cr
₹743 Cr
₹764 Cr

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Krystal Integrated Services Ltd · KRYSTAL⚠ unverified

48%
52%
18%
13%
-2.5%
41%
26%
6.4%
11%
-12%

Quess Corp Ltd · QUESS

8.4%
-20%
-22%
-22%
-17%
3.4%
1.8%
3.4%
-2.2%
6.5%
15%

SIS Ltd · SIS

13%
14%
12%
13%
11%
11%
5.8%
4.7%
5.1%
6.3%
9.4%
9.2%
13%
15%
24%
31%

Updater Services Ltd · UDS⚠ unverified

17%
10%
13%
13%
9.3%
12%
7.4%
7.2%
10%
4.8%
9.1%
07 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Krystal Integrated Services Ltd has the highest OPM among the 4 Facility Management companies compared here, at 7%. Updater Services Ltd is next at 6%. The same company also holds the highest Margin change, at +1 percentage points. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Krystal Integrated Services Ltd leads both opm at 7% and margin change at +1 percentage points.

LeaderKrystal Integrated Services Ltd · 7%
Gap16.7% versus #2 · Updater Services Ltd
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 70 observations

Investor read: Krystal Integrated Services Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Krystal Integrated Services Ltd KRYSTAL⚠ unverified7.0%
2Updater Services Ltd UDS⚠ unverified6.0%
3SIS Ltd SIS4.6%
4Quess Corp Ltd QUESS2.0%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Krystal Integrated Services Ltd KRYSTAL⚠ unverified+1.0 pp
2Quess Corp Ltd QUESS+0.1 pp
3Updater Services Ltd UDS⚠ unverified0.0 pp
4SIS Ltd SIS−0.2 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Krystal Integrated Services Ltd KRYSTAL⚠ unverified7.0%+1.0 ppMar 2026
Updater Services Ltd UDS⚠ unverified6.0%0.0 ppJun 2026
SIS Ltd SIS4.6%−0.2 ppMar 2026
Quess Corp Ltd QUESS2.0%+0.1 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Krystal Integrated Services Ltd · KRYSTAL⚠ unverified

8.0%
5.0%
7.0%
7.0%
7.0%
6.0%
6.0%
6.0%
6.0%
6.0%
7.0%
6.0%
7.0%
7.0%

Quess Corp Ltd · QUESS

3.5%
4.9%
4.9%
3.9%
3.2%
3.0%
3.0%
3.4%
3.4%
3.8%
1.7%
1.8%
1.9%
1.6%
1.8%
1.9%
2.0%
2.0%
2.2%
2.0%

SIS Ltd · SIS

5.0%
5.0%
4.7%
4.5%
4.0%
4.0%
4.5%
4.7%
4.7%
4.9%
2.7%
4.4%
4.4%
4.7%
4.8%
4.3%
4.5%
4.5%
4.6%

Updater Services Ltd · UDS⚠ unverified

4.7%
4.8%
3.6%
6.0%
6.0%
4.4%
5.0%
6.0%
6.0%
6.0%
7.0%
5.0%
6.0%
4.3%
2.7%
6.0%
6.0%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Krystal Integrated Services Ltd · KRYSTAL⚠ unverified

−1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.0 pp

Quess Corp Ltd · QUESS

−1.9 pp
−0.5 pp
+3.6 pp
−1.1 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.9 pp
−0.5 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.8 pp
−1.3 pp
−1.6 pp
−1.5 pp
−2.2 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.1 pp

SIS Ltd · SIS

−1.0 pp
−1.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.6 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.9 pp
−1.8 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.2 pp
+2.1 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.2 pp

Updater Services Ltd · UDS⚠ unverified

+1.3 pp
−0.4 pp
+1.4 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.6 pp
+2.0 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.7 pp
−4.3 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
08 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Quess Corp Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 4 Facility Management companies compared here, at ₹253 crore. SIS Ltd is next at ₹138 crore. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at the 100% top of the scoring scale. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Quess Corp Ltd leads with ₹253 crore of TTM profit, 83.3% above SIS Ltd. Quess Corp Ltd shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (416.3% uncapped) growth from a ₹253 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderQuess Corp Ltd · ₹253 crore
Gap83.3% versus #2 · SIS Ltd
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 63 observations

Investor read: Quess Corp Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Quess Corp Ltd QUESS₹253 Cr
2SIS Ltd SIS₹138 Cr
3Updater Services Ltd UDS⚠ unverified₹84 Cr
4Krystal Integrated Services Ltd KRYSTAL⚠ unverified₹64 Cr
Profit growthfastest growers
1Quess Corp Ltd QUESS100%
2Krystal Integrated Services Ltd KRYSTAL⚠ unverified3.2%
3Updater Services Ltd UDS⚠ unverified-31%
Net profit · company comparison
4/4 level · 3/4 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
SIS Ltd SIS₹102 Cr-235%Mar 2026
Quess Corp Ltd QUESS₹82 Cr61%Jun 2026
Updater Services Ltd UDS⚠ unverified₹30 Cr3.5%Jun 2026
Krystal Integrated Services Ltd KRYSTAL⚠ unverified₹19 Cr12%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Krystal Integrated Services Ltd · KRYSTAL⚠ unverified

₹9 Cr
₹9 Cr
₹9 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹19 Cr

Quess Corp Ltd · QUESS

₹85 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹48 Cr
₹71 Cr
₹64 Cr
₹98 Cr
₹49 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹42 Cr
₹-95 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹52 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹64 Cr
₹82 Cr

SIS Ltd · SIS

₹68 Cr
₹101 Cr
₹97 Cr
₹83 Cr
₹67 Cr
₹103 Cr
₹93 Cr
₹90 Cr
₹75 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹-12 Cr
₹64 Cr
₹69 Cr
₹102 Cr
₹-223 Cr
₹93 Cr
₹81 Cr
₹-138 Cr
₹102 Cr

Updater Services Ltd · UDS⚠ unverified

₹5 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹9 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹26 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹34 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹7 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹30 Cr

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Krystal Integrated Services Ltd · KRYSTAL⚠ unverified

44%
78%
67%
25%
15%
6.3%
6.7%
-13%
6.7%
12%

Quess Corp Ltd · QUESS

-25%
227%
2.1%
-28%
-34%
-197%
4.1%
2.0%
31%
61%

SIS Ltd · SIS

41%
-1.5%
2.0%
-4.1%
8.4%
12%
-64%
-113%
-29%
-8.0%
176%
45%
17%
-235%

Updater Services Ltd · UDS⚠ unverified

342%
140%
117%
211%
48%
42%
12%
-29%
-77%
-21%
3.5%
09 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Quess Corp Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 4 Facility Management companies compared here, at 23%. Krystal Integrated Services Ltd is next at 15.9%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +13 percentage points. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Quess Corp Ltd leads ROCE at 23%, 7.1 percentage points above Krystal Integrated Services Ltd. Quess Corp Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +13 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderQuess Corp Ltd · 23%
Gap44.7% versus #2 · Krystal Integrated Services Ltd
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage4/4 companies · 40 observations

Investor read: Quess Corp Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Quess Corp Ltd QUESS23%
2Krystal Integrated Services Ltd KRYSTAL⚠ unverified16%
3SIS Ltd SIS14%
4Updater Services Ltd UDS⚠ unverified10.0%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Quess Corp Ltd QUESS+13.0 pp
2SIS Ltd SIS−0.6 pp
3Updater Services Ltd UDS⚠ unverified−1.3 pp
4Krystal Integrated Services Ltd KRYSTAL⚠ unverified−1.5 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change

Withheld from this chart: Quess Corp Ltd (QUESS) — its two data sources disagree by up to 143% on reported income across 13 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Krystal Integrated Services Ltd KRYSTAL⚠ unverified14%−1.5 ppMar 2026
SIS Ltd SIS12%−0.6 ppMar 2026
Updater Services Ltd UDS⚠ unverified10%−1.3 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Krystal Integrated Services Ltd · KRYSTAL⚠ unverified

16%
29%
31%
16%
26%
15%
24%
15%
21%
15%
21%
14%

SIS Ltd · SIS

17%
13%
12%
10%
11%
15%
14%
13%
13%
13%
12%
7.6%
12%
-0.6%
12%

Updater Services Ltd · UDS⚠ unverified

12%
18%
9.8%
12%
10%
15%
11%
14%
11%
15%
9.9%
9.8%
10%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Krystal Integrated Services Ltd · KRYSTAL⚠ unverified

0.0 pp
−13.6 pp
−6.4 pp
−0.5 pp
−5.1 pp
0.0 pp
−3.6 pp
−1.5 pp

SIS Ltd · SIS

−5.3 pp
−2.7 pp
−0.7 pp
+3.7 pp
+1.6 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.8 pp
−5.3 pp
−0.4 pp
−13.8 pp
−0.6 pp

Updater Services Ltd · UDS⚠ unverified

−2.1 pp
−7.7 pp
+0.9 pp
+2.6 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.8 pp
−4.6 pp
−1.3 pp
10 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

SIS Ltd has the lowest PEG among the 4 Facility Management companies compared here, at 0.21×. Krystal Integrated Services Ltd has the lowest P/E at 13×, so level and change sit with different companies. 1 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: SIS Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.21×. Only 1 of 4 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderSIS Ltd · 0.21×
GapNot enough peers
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage1/4 companies · 2 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
1SIS Ltd SIS0.2
P/Elowest P/E
1Krystal Integrated Services Ltd KRYSTAL⚠ unverified13.0
2Updater Services Ltd UDS⚠ unverified14.9
3SIS Ltd SIS17.3
4Quess Corp Ltd QUESS19.2
Valuation · company comparison
1/4 level · 4/4 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
SIS Ltd SIS0.211.9Mar 2026
Quess Corp Ltd QUESS16.4Jun 2026
Updater Services Ltd UDS⚠ unverified10.2Jun 2026
Krystal Integrated Services Ltd KRYSTAL⚠ unverified13.1Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

SIS Ltd · SIS

2.8
0.2

P/E · reported quarter history

Krystal Integrated Services Ltd · KRYSTAL⚠ unverified

11.4
12.1
24.1
23.4
12.8
16.2
15.9
12.6
13.1

Quess Corp Ltd · QUESS

99.1
107.7
42.6
18.6
18.1
11.2
11.6
17.3
17.9
18.9
15.9
17.9
23.2
21.4
25.2
21.8
17.8
14.9
11.5
16.4

SIS Ltd · SIS

12.1
12.9
13.9
20.3
17.6
16.6
13.5
17.9
17.8
18.4
20.2
34.7
37.1
33.8
21.0
18.5
15.6
14.7
11.9

Updater Services Ltd · UDS⚠ unverified

42.1
31.8
29.4
30.3
25.8
16.9
16.4
13.8
11.1
7.5
10.2
11 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Facility Management comparison names 7 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 4 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 2 draw at least one figure from a second feed with too little overlap to cross-check. 1 has second-feed figures withheld because the two sources disagree.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 2 companies draw at least one figure from a second data feed with too little overlapping history to cross-check against the primary source; they are marked unverified wherever those figures appear.
  • 1 company is missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
  • Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
12 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 4 Facility Management companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-31. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-31 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing1 cross-checked · 2 unverified · 1 withheld, of 4 graded companies.
How a second data feed is admitted, and what happens when it disagrees

A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from.

13 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Facility Management company comparison FAQs

These 23 answers restate the Facility Management comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 4 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-31. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Facility Management sector outperforming NIFTY 500?

Facility Management has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 5.1% over 52 weeks and 25.5% over 13 weeks. 3 of 4 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 3 of 4 beat the sector itself.

Which Facility Management company is largest by revenue?

SIS Ltd leads with revenue of ₹15,981 crore, based on 4 of 4 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Which Facility Management company is growing fastest?

SIS Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 21.2%, across 4 of 4 comparable companies.

Which Facility Management company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Quess Corp Ltd ranks first at 73.1/100 with 79.3% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Facility Management company has the lowest comparable PEG?

SIS Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.21, among 1 of 4 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Facility Management comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

What is the Nifty Facility Management index?

The Nifty Facility Management index tracks India's listed Facility Management companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 4 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Facility Management sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Jun 2026.

Which are the best Facility Management stocks in India?

Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Quess Corp Ltd places first among 4 listed Facility Management companies, followed by SIS Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.

How many Facility Management stocks are listed in India?

This comparison covers 4 listed Facility Management companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.

Which Facility Management company is the biggest?

SIS Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹15,981 crore, ahead of Quess Corp Ltd at ₹15,836 crore. That covers 4 of 4 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.

Which Facility Management company has the best profit margins?

Krystal Integrated Services Ltd has the highest operating margin at 7%, from 4 of 4 comparable companies. Krystal Integrated Services Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +1 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Facility Management company makes the most profit?

Quess Corp Ltd earns the most, at ₹253 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 4 of 4 comparable companies. Quess Corp Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Facility Management company earns the highest return on capital?

Quess Corp Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 23%, across 4 of 4 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Facility Management stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — SIS Ltd screens cheapest at 0.21×. Only 1 of 4 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Facility Management sector beating the market?

Facility Management has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 5.1% over the last 52 weeks and 25.5% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 3 of 4 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Facility Management stock has the strongest price momentum?

Quess Corp Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Facility Management company scores highest for research priority?

Quess Corp Ltd scores 73.1 out of 100 with 79.3% evidence confidence, from 25 points on growth and earnings, 17.7 on capital efficiency, 10.4 on valuation and 20 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Facility Management companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 4 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Facility Management sector?

The 4 Facility Management companies on this page carry ₹13,135 crore of combined market value. SIS Ltd is the largest at ₹5,969 crore, about 45% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-05.

How is the Facility Management sector performing?

3 of the 4 covered Facility Management companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 5.1% behind NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-05.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI