Facility Management Stocks and Companies in India

The largest Facility Management stocks in India by market value are SIS (₹5,374 crore), Quess Corp (₹4,882 crore) and Updater Services (₹1,360 crore), at prices of 4 Nov 2026.

• SIS: ₹387.05 | market value ₹5,374 crore | P/E 13.4
• Quess Corp: ₹326.85 | market value ₹4,882 crore | P/E 17.3
• Updater Services: ₹203.03 | market value ₹1,360 crore | P/E 13.1
• Krystal Integrated Services: ₹579.85 | market value ₹810 crore | P/E 12.4

Share price | market value | P/E, biggest first. Prices, market values and ratios at the official close of 4 Nov 2026; the score list below uses the weekly figures.

All 4 listed Indian Facility Management companies are named here, largest first. This is the set of companies people mean when they search for a Nifty Facility Management index; NSE publishes its own indices only for the largest sectors, so this equal-weighted set stands in for one. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies and carries its own as-of date.

1. SIS Ltd₹5,130 cr
2. Quess Corp Ltd₹4,570 cr
3. Updater Services Ltd₹1,360 cr
4. Krystal Integrated Services Ltd₹791 cr

4 Facility Management companies in the Facility Management industry group have a page on Sector Alpha, by market value as of 30 October 2026, and all 4 are listed below, largest first. The largest is SIS (₹5,126 crore) and the smallest with a market value is Krystal Integrated Services.

Download all 4 Facility Management companies (CSV)

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the last two years (104 weeks) this sector is 16% behind NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 36% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of NIFTY 500 on a rolling three-month view for 28 weeks running.

1 of 4 companies pass the momentum test (5+ points ahead of the Nifty 500 over 3 months, within 20% of the 52-week high).

Ahead of NIFTY 500 on the three-month view for 28 weeks running; 2 of the 4 companies in the industry index above their 200-day average (2 fewer than four weeks earlier); 1 of those 4 pass the momentum test (1 fewer than four weeks earlier); earnings rising at 3 of the 4 that report earnings.

Participation is shrinking, 2 → 1 of 4 over four weeks, after being ahead of NIFTY 500. Price-only fade, 3 of 4 members have higher trailing twelve-month earnings than a year ago, so the fade is in the price, not in the earnings.

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the gap between them tells the story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 4 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member set to 100 at the start and the sector taking the middle value, so a price line pulling away from flat bars means the market is paying more for the same earnings. A bar turns grey when that figure is lower than the quarter before. The rules are fixed and the same everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover or tap any point to read both values and the gap.

Facility Management has done better than the NIFTY 500 by 14.8% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 2.1%. Quess Corp Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +14.6%. Readings are as of 30 October 2026.

Relative-strength score for the industry: 9.6 as of 30 October 2026 (narrowing, rising).

Facility Management has done better than the NIFTY 500 by 14.8% over 52 weeks and by 2.1% over 13 weeks. 1 of 4 companies we track is beating the NIFTY on relative strength (how a share price has done against the index over recent months), and 1 of the 2 with a long enough price history is ahead of the industry itself.

A score that ranks each company against the others in its industry. The four parts shown always add up to the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or old evidence affects only its own part, never as a hidden adjustment.

Quess Corp Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 79.3% evidence confidence.

Updater Services Ltd scores well on valuation against its peers or its own history, but its earnings have not yet improved enough to back that up.

Quess Corp Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Facility Management at +27.6%. It also leads on relative strength against the NIFTY, at +29.2%. 4 of 4 companies we track are ahead of the index on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 30 October 2026.

Price and relative strength

Price · same starting point: Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts: the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

RS vs NIFTY 500: How far ahead of or behind NIFTY 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS NIFTY 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.

RS vs sector: The same measure taken against Facility Management itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.

Biggest one-year moves

Strongest against NIFTY 500

Strongest against the sector itself

3 of 4 Facility Management companies held a results call for April to June 2026. SIS guided: Business growth 18-20% this year; security around 15%, FM 11-12% and international above 20%.

From the results calls for April to June 2026.

Big funds, foreign and Indian, cut their stake by 1.8 points over the last two quarters. Founders and promoters kept theirs about the same.

• Spending on new plants and equipment was ₹142 crore in the last 12 months, 84% less than a year before.
• Projects still being built grew 78% in a year.

Big funds = foreign and Indian institutions, change in their share of ownership across 4 Facility Management companies, in percentage points.

Ownership and spending as of 10 October 2026.

This is the written read behind the Facility Management figures above: what is actually happening in the industry, in words, with the evidence each claim rests on. It is dated 17 Apr 2026, so the words are older than the numbers. 3 themes are live here.

The sector demonstrates clear margin expansion capabilities driven by a deliberate shift toward value-added services. However, near-term volume growth is constrained by regulatory adjustments and seasonal labor churn. The ability to maintain EBITDA margins above 2% while re-accelerating headcount additions will dictate the trajectory for the next fiscal year.

The Facility Management sector, represented by a single constituent (QUESS) in this reporting cycle, is currently navigating a MIXED demand environment. Financial performance reflects a divergence between profitability and volume metrics. QUESS reported a 3% quarter-on-quarter revenue growth, reaching INR 3,930 crores.

How old this read is: OLD: this read comes from our Facility Management sector brief dated 17 Apr 2026, about 7 months ago. The page says so rather than dressing it up, and a fresh sector dive replaces it the day it runs.

What is live in this sector right now

Sources: our Facility Management sector brief, 17 Apr 2026 · company earnings-call transcripts.

SIS Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 4 Facility Management companies compared here, at ₹17,037 crore. Quess Corp Ltd is next at ₹16,400 crore. The same company also has the highest Revenue growth, at 25.2%. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026. Its Revenue series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: SIS Ltd is the largest at ₹17,037 crore, 3.9% ahead of Quess Corp Ltd. Fast growth from a smaller base is not yet the same as proven size.

What this means: SIS Ltd is both the largest and the fastest-growing company here; the growth has to turn into margin and returns before it counts as more than a fast start.

This conclusion weakens if: SIS Ltd's revenue growth slows for two consecutive comparable reports while its operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.

Revenue · company comparison

Revenue · largest

Revenue growth · fastest growers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

Revenue shows both size and speed. A large company can absorb shocks and pay for wide distribution; faster growth can mean market-share gains, new capacity or stronger demand. The best sign is usually growth that lasts without hurting margins and returns.

Krystal Integrated Services Ltd has the highest OPM among the 4 Facility Management companies compared here, at 6%. Updater Services Ltd is next at 5%. Updater Services Ltd has the highest Margin change at +0.7 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Krystal Integrated Services Ltd leads opm at 6%; Updater Services Ltd leads margin change at +0.7 percentage points.

What this means: Krystal Integrated Services Ltd sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.

Operating margin · company comparison

OPM · highest

Margin change · fastest expanders

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Quess Corp Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 4 Facility Management companies compared here, at ₹276 crore. SIS Ltd is next at ₹147 crore. The same company also has the highest Profit growth, at the 100% top of the scoring scale. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.

What the numbers say: Quess Corp Ltd earns the most, ₹276 crore of profit over the last 12 months, 87.8% above SIS Ltd. Quess Corp Ltd shows at least 100% on the scoring scale (452% in full) growth from a profit base of ₹276 crore. A fast rate from a small base matters less than a large profit that keeps coming.

What this means: Quess Corp Ltd sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.

Net profit · company comparison

Net profit · largest

Profit growth · fastest growers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Quess Corp Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 4 Facility Management companies compared here, at 24%. Krystal Integrated Services Ltd is next at 16.2%. The same company also has the highest ROCE change, at +12 percentage points. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.

What the numbers say: Quess Corp Ltd leads ROCE at 24%, 7.8 percentage points above Krystal Integrated Services Ltd. A high return reported once may be one good year; a high return reported year after year shows a lasting business.

What this means: Quess Corp Ltd sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.

Return on capital · company comparison

Withheld from this chart: Quess Corp Ltd (QUESS): its two data sources disagree by up to 143% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Krystal Integrated Services Ltd (KRYSTAL): its two data sources disagree by up to 77% on reported income across 15 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn, the gap is a decision, not missing data.

ROCE · highest

ROCE change · fastest improvers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Updater Services Ltd has the lowest PEG among the 4 Facility Management companies compared here, at 1.04×. SIS Ltd is next at 2.79×. Krystal Integrated Services Ltd has the lowest P/E at 12.1×, so level and change sit with different companies. 2 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.

What the numbers say: Updater Services Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 1.04×, 62.7% below SIS Ltd. That would need today's multiple, the company's own history and steady growth to agree.

What this means: A low valuation is a reason to look closer at the business, not a conclusion on its own.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is worked out the same way every time, as the P/E on the last 12 months of reported earnings divided by that growth rate, never on expected earnings. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.

Valuation · company comparison

PEG · lowest PEG

P/E · lowest P/E

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Facility Management companies show up on 3 of our India lists. The most are on the dividend stocks list (2 companies).

This Facility Management comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 4 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 2 have second-source figures left out because the two sources disagree. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings.

Keep these limits visible

• A high growth rate can come from a very small starting figure. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
• A high ROCE can be temporary, or look high because the capital base is small. It is best read beside margin, cash flow and how much is spent back on the business.
• The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks published data only. Management quality, upcoming events and risks are not part of it.
• An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
• 2 companies are missing from the second-source figures on purpose: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Those rows have less evidence; that does not make the business weaker.
• Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 4 Facility Management companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Sep 2026 and market data through 30 October 2026.

2 of 4 companies have a second data feed that is known to disagree with the primary source, so nothing from it is drawn: Quess Corp Ltd (QUESS): its two data sources disagree by up to 143% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Krystal Integrated Services Ltd (KRYSTAL): its two data sources disagree by up to 77% on reported income across 15 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld.

These 23 answers restate the Facility Management comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 4 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Sep 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 30 October 2026. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.