Market cap is price times coins in circulation, from CoinGecko. The small words beside each coin are CoinGecko's own tags. A size ranking, not a pick.
What is SocialFi crypto?
SocialFi crypto coins are the coins CoinGecko tags as SocialFi. Each coin sits in one theme only: the first, most specific one its tags match. We track 4 SocialFi coins.
Bottom line
Steem ranks first for research priority in SocialFi crypto at 61.7/100, and its native activity proof is incomplete. The theme's 13-week excess versus Bitcoin is -21% on 0% breadth, which is what decides whether that lead is isolated or broad. 0 of the 4 assets here carry enough native evidence to move past a price-led label.
These SocialFi coins are part of the cryptocurrency universe this site tracks daily: the top 1,000 coins by market cap when the list was built, priced from exchange closes where we have a price we trust, and matched to protocol fees and revenue where a protocol publishes them.
BTC LED market context
SocialFi vs Bitcoin: Relative Strength & Breadth
SocialFi crypto has underperformed Bitcoin by 45.3% over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of current members. Over 13 weeks the figure is -21%. 0 of 4 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Steem leads Bitcoin-relative strength at +14.2%. Price readings are as of 2026-11-06.
-21%13 weeks vs Bitcoin
-45%52 weeks vs Bitcoin
0 of 4above their 200-day average
STEEMfurthest ahead of Bitcoin · +14%
SocialFi · equal weightBitcoin
Current-member equal-weight sector index versus Bitcoin, both rebased to 100. Historical market-cap weights are not invented.
Assets
4
canonical functional membership
Activity-covered
0/4
enough native evidence
Top score
61.7/100
Steem
Calendar quarters
20
complete; missing stays missing
Global asset selection · top 20 shown
00 · exact additive research priority
4-Factor Crypto Evidence Score
A within-theme research-priority score for the 4 assets in SocialFi, out of 100. The four displayed point contributions add exactly to the total, and the market regime changes the action label, never the arithmetic. Steem is highest at 61.7/100 on 50% evidence. It ranks research attention, not portfolio action.
Steem leads the current research queue at 61.7/100 with 50% evidence.
0 of 4 assets have enough native activity evidence to move beyond a price-led label.
Missing native metrics are not scored as zero and are not silently reweighted. They pull only the affected factor toward neutral and lower its visible evidence percentage. An asset with nothing measurable at all is not scored at 50 either: it is listed as not rated.
1. Steem · STEEM
61.7/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 25.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.6 = 61.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +14.2 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +11.5 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
11.6/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $2.2M · price swings: 63.9% a year
100% evidence
2. A Hunters Dream · CAW
40.6/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 7.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.5 = 40.6
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −44.1 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +4.7 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
8.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $325.8K · price swings: 55.3% a year
100% evidence
3. Atoshi · ATOS
39.7/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 8.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.5 = 39.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −34 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −4.7 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $30.3K · price swings: 43.2% a year
100% evidence
4. Decentralized Social · DESO
29.5/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 4.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 0.5 = 29.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −46 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −6.8 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
0.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $612 · price swings: 113.9% a year
100% evidence
01 · let price answer last
Which assets lead on price and relative strength?
Steem leads the SocialFi tape on Bitcoin-relative strength at +14% over 90 days. 0 of 4 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Price shows what happened; BTC-relative strength shows whether the asset beat crypto’s opportunity-cost benchmark. Both lines run through 2026-11-06.
Complete set · no silent drops
Which assets are in SocialFi?
4 of the 4 coins assigned to SocialFi are rated and ranked below, with every one visible: price-only names that publish no protocol activity included. Each asset has exactly one canonical functional theme, chosen by a specific-to-general first match on its categories. Pegged, wrapped, liquid-staking receipt and tokenized-asset instruments are excluded because they have no independent price discovery.
This SocialFi comparison names 5 ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. The largest is that crypto network activity is not company earnings: protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders. Coverage is also uneven: 0 of 4 assets carry enough native evidence to rank on more than price.
Crypto network activity is not company earnings. Protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders.
Market-cap values are a dated universe snapshot, not point-in-time historical supply data.
Current category labels are applied to historical prices; this creates survivorship and taxonomy hindsight.
Funding rates, open interest, liquidations, exchange flows, unlock schedules, historical circulating supply and developer activity are not held and are not inferred.
Equal weighting is used for sector history because true historical market-cap weights are unavailable.
Price and technicalsThrough 2026-11-06. Five-year weekly observations benchmarked to Bitcoin.
Protocol activityNot published for these coins. Fees, revenue, protocol TVL and DEX volume.
Chain activityUsers and transactions: not published for these coins; chain TVL: not published for these coins.
Market capSnapshot dated 2026-11-07; no historical supply series is implied.
Questions the page should answer directly
Crypto analysis FAQs
These 16 answers cover the questions this page can settle from data it holds: what the category is, how the score is built, what the coverage gaps are, and what would change the read. Every answer below is also present in the page’s FAQ schema and in its plain-text rendition. None of them is a recommendation.
What is SocialFi crypto?
SocialFi crypto coins are the coins CoinGecko tags as SocialFi. Each coin sits in one theme only: the first, most specific one its tags match. We track 4 SocialFi coins.
What is the total market cap of SocialFi crypto coins?
The 4 SocialFi coins on this page with a current market cap were worth about $77M together, by CoinGecko's reading of 7 November 2026. Individual figures are in the table.
Are SocialFi crypto coins outperforming Bitcoin?
SocialFi has returned -45.3% versus Bitcoin over 52 weeks and -21% over 13 weeks on an equal-weight current-member index. 0/4 covered assets are above their 200-day averages as of 2026-11-06.
Which SocialFi asset has the strongest research score?
Steem ranks first at 61.7/100: 25.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.6 = 61.7. It is labelled “Thinly traded” with 50% overall evidence and 0% native-economics evidence.
Why are some SocialFi coins not rated?
Every SocialFi coin on this page clears the data screen: a traded price within 7 days of 2026-11-06, no gap longer than 30 days inside the 95-day window the readings are measured over, and some traded volume over the last 30 days.
How is the SocialFi 4-factor score calculated?
The exact sum is Market leadership /35 + Network and economic traction /30 + Value capture /20 + Liquidity and downside risk /15. Missing data pulls only the affected factor toward neutral and lowers evidence; it is never silently reweighted.
Why can a SocialFi asset be labelled price-led?
Price-led means price and relative-strength evidence exists but less than half of the native traction and value-capture evidence is available. Such assets remain visible but rank below fully evidenced assets.
Does protocol revenue accrue to the token?
Not necessarily. Protocol fees and revenue measure network economics; token-holder value depends on the protocol’s burn, buyback, staking, distribution and governance rules. This page never assumes accrual merely because revenue exists.
Does crypto have a P/E or PEG ratio?
No comparable company-style P/E or PEG is used. Where coverage permits, the page shows network fee yield and protocol-revenue yield against a dated market-cap snapshot, with an explicit token-accrual caveat.
How much history is shown for SocialFi?
The page shows five years of weekly price and relative-strength history and 20 complete calendar quarters of on-chain activity where available. Missing periods remain gaps.
Why do the crypto data dates differ?
Prices and technical metrics run through 2026-11-06; protocol activity through the latest available protocol date; chain users and transactions through the latest available chain date; chain TVL through the latest available chain-TVL date; market capitalisation is a separate snapshot dated 2026-11-07.
Are stablecoins and wrapped tokens included in SocialFi?
No. Pegged, wrapped, liquid-staking receipt and tokenized-asset instruments are excluded because they do not have independent price discovery.
Can one token appear in multiple raw crypto categories?
Yes, but pages on this site assign each asset to exactly one functional theme using a specific-to-general first-match taxonomy. SocialFi therefore has one canonical membership list.
What would invalidate the current SocialFi theme read?
Two of the three weakening conditions are already in place as of 2026-11-06: the 13-week return versus Bitcoin is -21% (below zero) and 0 of 4 covered assets are above the 200-day average (below one-third). The read depends on native protocol activity remaining supportive, a contraction there would complete the invalidation.
Does this page include funding rates, open interest or token unlocks?
No. Those datasets are not held in the current research store, so the page names them as unavailable rather than inferring them from price.
Which are the biggest SocialFi crypto coins by market cap?
Steem is the largest SocialFi crypto coin by market capitalisation at $27M, ahead of Atoshi at $26.9M and A Hunters Dream at $12.9M. The 4 SocialFi coins on this page carry $76.7M between them, with a market-cap figure on file for 4 of them. Market-cap metadata is dated 2026-11-07.