Market cap is price times coins in circulation, from CoinGecko. The small words beside each coin are CoinGecko's own tags. A size ranking, not a pick.
What is NFT crypto?
NFT crypto coins are the coins CoinGecko tags as NFT. Each coin sits in one theme only: the first, most specific one its tags match. We track 7 NFT coins, 6 of them rated below.
Bottom line
Audius ranks first for research priority in NFT crypto at 49.7/100, and its native activity proof is incomplete. The theme's 13-week excess versus Bitcoin is -13.4% on 0% breadth, which is what decides whether that lead is isolated or broad. 0 of the 6 assets here carry enough native evidence to move past a price-led label.
These NFT coins are part of the cryptocurrency universe this site tracks daily: the top 1,000 coins by market cap when the list was built, priced from exchange closes where we have a price we trust, and matched to protocol fees and revenue where a protocol publishes them.
The theme itself · before any single company
How has NFT moved against Bitcoin?
The line below covers up to 5 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this theme is 30% behind Bitcoin. Protocol revenue across its protocols fell 11% on average over the last four reported quarters.
FADING · −1 in 4w·Price down, no fundamental support1 of 7 coins ahead of Bitcoin by 5% or more over three months
Not ahead of Bitcoin right now; 2/7 >200d (−1); 1 of 7 ahead of Bitcoin by 5% or more over three months (1 fewer than four weeks earlier).
NFT, equal-weighted, based at 200Bitcoin, same base, same starttrailing 12-month protocol revenue risingfalling
NFT, equal-weighted, based at 200Bitcoin, same base, same starttrailing 12-month protocol revenue risingfalling
NFT, equal-weighted, based at 200Bitcoin, same base, same starttrailing 12-month protocol revenue risingfalling
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the gap between them tells the story: the theme line is an equal-weighted index of its 7 coins. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month protocol revenue, one bar per reported quarter, each member set to 100 at the start and the theme taking the middle value, so a price line pulling away from flat bars means the market is paying more for the same earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. The rules are fixed and the same everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while protocol revenue grew 20% or more. Hover or tap any point to read both values and the gap.
BTC LED market context
NFT vs Bitcoin: Relative Strength & Breadth
NFT crypto has underperformed Bitcoin by 31% over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of current members. Over 13 weeks the figure is -13.4%. 0 of 6 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Ethereum Name Service leads Bitcoin-relative strength at -5%. Price readings are as of 2026-10-30.
-13%13 weeks vs Bitcoin
-31%52 weeks vs Bitcoin
0 of 6above their 200-day average
ENSfurthest ahead of Bitcoin · -5.0%
Assets
6
canonical functional membership
Activity-covered
0/6
enough native evidence
Top score
49.7/100
Audius
Calendar quarters
20
complete; missing stays missing
Global asset selection · top 20 shown
00 · exact additive research priority
4-Factor Crypto Evidence Score
A within-theme research-priority score for the 6 assets in NFT, out of 100. The four displayed point contributions add exactly to the total, and the market regime changes the action label, never the arithmetic. Audius is highest at 49.7/100 on 50% evidence. It ranks research attention, not portfolio action.
Audius leads the current research queue at 49.7/100 with 50% evidence.
0 of 6 assets have enough native activity evidence to move beyond a price-led label.
1 of the 7 NFT coins is not rated this week: 1 reports no traded volume. They are listed in full below the ranking.
Missing native metrics are not scored as zero and are not silently reweighted. They pull only the affected factor toward neutral and lower its visible evidence percentage. An asset with nothing measurable at all is not scored at 50 either: it is listed as not rated.
1. Audius · AUDIO
49.7/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 15.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.5 = 49.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −10.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +1.7 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
9.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $5.7M · price swings: 54.1% a year
100% evidence
2. Ethereum Name Service · ENS
43.9/100 · Price-led, little network data · 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.1 + 8.6 + 10.0 + 10.2 = 43.9
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −5 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −7.8 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
8.6/30Usage growth
Fees -37.8% · revenue -37.8% · users —
53% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield 1.93% · revenue yield 1.93%
19% evidence
10.2/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $11.2M · price swings: 51.9% a year
100% evidence
3. Chiliz · CHZ
43.4/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 7.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.8 = 43.4
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −23.6 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −1.7 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
10.8/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $15.5M · price swings: 61.7% a year
100% evidence
4. SWFTCOIN · SWFTC
41.5/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 9.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.5 = 41.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −17.8 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +1.7 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
7.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $532.2K · price swings: 29.5% a year
100% evidence
5. GAL (migrated to Gravity - G) · GAL
39.8/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 12.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 2.7 = 39.8
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −38.3 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +15.9 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
2.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.6M · price swings: 302.3% a year
100% evidence
6. Magic Eden · ME
35.7/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 8.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 2.7 = 35.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −26.7 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −3.2 pts · below its 200-day average
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
2.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $327.8K · price swings: 62.5% a year
100% evidence
Showing 5 of 6 ranked assets
01 · complete calendar-quarter evidence
Which projects are generating the most network fees?
Ethereum Name Service leads NFT crypto on Trailing 12-month fees at $3.9M. The one asset with comparable change data is not growing. Coverage is 1 of the 6 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q3 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero.
LeaderEthereum Name Service · $3.9M
GapNot comparable
Persistence0 assets have positive comparable growth
Coverage1 of 6 assets
Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.
This conclusion weakens if: fee growth turns negative across two complete calendar quarters or fee coverage falls below the stated threshold.
Trailing 12-month fees is the sum of the latest four complete calendar quarters. Growth compares that sum with the prior four-quarter sum.
Trailing 12-month feesonly one with data
1Ethereum Name Service ENS$3.9M
Fee growthonly one with data
1Ethereum Name Service ENS-38%
Network fees · asset comparison
1 of 6 coins report it · 1 with a comparable change
Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first
Asset
Trailing 12-month fees
Fee growth
Audius AUDIO
—
—
Ethereum Name Service ENS
$803.1K
-38%
Chiliz CHZ
—
—
SWFTCOIN SWFTC
—
—
GAL (migrated to Gravity - G) GAL
—
—
Magic Eden ME
—
—
02 · complete calendar-quarter evidence
Which projects convert activity into protocol revenue?
Ethereum Name Service leads NFT crypto on Trailing 12-month revenue at $3.9M. The one asset with comparable change data is not growing. Coverage is 1 of the 6 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q3 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero.
LeaderEthereum Name Service · $3.9M
GapNot comparable
Persistence0 assets have positive comparable growth
Coverage1 of 6 assets
Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.
This conclusion weakens if: revenue growth turns negative or the revenue-to-fees take rate falls for two complete calendar quarters.
Trailing 12-month revenue is the sum of the latest four complete calendar quarters. Growth compares that sum with the prior four-quarter sum.
Trailing 12-month revenueonly one with data
1Ethereum Name Service ENS$3.9M
Revenue growthonly one with data
1Ethereum Name Service ENS-38%
Protocol revenue · asset comparison
1 of 6 coins report it · 1 with a comparable change
Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first
Asset
Trailing 12-month revenue
Revenue growth
Audius AUDIO
—
—
Ethereum Name Service ENS
$803.1K
-38%
Chiliz CHZ
—
—
SWFTCOIN SWFTC
—
—
GAL (migrated to Gravity - G) GAL
—
—
Magic Eden ME
—
—
03 · complete calendar-quarter evidence
Where is capital actually committed on-chain?
Magic Eden leads NFT crypto on Quarter-end TVL at $152.5K. Coverage is 1 of the 6 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q3 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero.
LeaderMagic Eden · $152.5K
GapNot comparable
Persistence0 assets have positive comparable growth
Coverage1 of 6 assets
Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.
This conclusion weakens if: TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.
Quarter-end TVL uses protocol TVL first for protocol assets and exact-ID chain TVL for chain assets or where protocol TVL is unavailable. A blank is unavailable, not zero. Growth compares with the same complete quarter one year earlier.
Quarter-end TVLonly one with data
1Magic Eden ME$152.5K
TVL growth
—Not enough comparable data—
Total value locked · asset comparison
1 of 6 coins report it · 0 with a comparable change
Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first
Asset
Quarter-end TVL
TVL growth
Audius AUDIO
—
—
Ethereum Name Service ENS
—
—
Chiliz CHZ
—
—
SWFTCOIN SWFTC
—
—
GAL (migrated to Gravity - G) GAL
—
—
Magic Eden ME
$152.5K
—
04 · let price answer last
Which assets lead on price and relative strength?
Ethereum Name Service leads the NFT tape on Bitcoin-relative strength at -5.0% over 90 days. 0 of 6 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Price shows what happened; BTC-relative strength shows whether the asset beat crypto’s opportunity-cost benchmark. Both lines run through 2026-10-30.
Complete set · no silent drops
Which assets are in NFT?
6 of the 7 coins assigned to NFT are rated and ranked below, and the other 1 is listed under it with the reason it is not rated: price-only names that publish no protocol activity included. Each asset has exactly one canonical functional theme, chosen by a specific-to-general first match on its categories.
1 of the 7 NFT coins is not rated this week: 1 reports no traded volume. Each one stays on this page with its reason instead of being scored at the midpoint of a range nothing measured.
No traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
Methodology · boundaries make the answer useful
What can make this comparison misleading?
This NFT comparison names 5 ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. The largest is that crypto network activity is not company earnings: protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders. Coverage is also uneven: 0 of 6 assets carry enough native evidence to rank on more than price.
Crypto network activity is not company earnings. Protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders.
Market-cap values are a dated universe snapshot, not point-in-time historical supply data.
Current category labels are applied to historical prices; this creates survivorship and taxonomy hindsight.
Funding rates, open interest, liquidations, exchange flows, unlock schedules, historical circulating supply and developer activity are not held and are not inferred.
Equal weighting is used for sector history because true historical market-cap weights are unavailable.
Price and technicalsThrough 2026-10-30. Five-year weekly observations benchmarked to Bitcoin.
Protocol activityThrough 2026-10-30. Fees, revenue, protocol TVL and DEX volume.
Chain activityUsers and transactions: not published for these coins; chain TVL: not published for these coins.
Market capSnapshot dated 2026-11-05; no historical supply series is implied.
Questions the page should answer directly
Crypto analysis FAQs
These 20 answers cover the questions this page can settle from data it holds: what the category is, how the score is built, what the coverage gaps are, and what would change the read. Every answer below is also present in the page’s FAQ schema and in its plain-text rendition. None of them is a recommendation.
What is NFT crypto?
NFT crypto coins are the coins CoinGecko tags as NFT. Each coin sits in one theme only: the first, most specific one its tags match. We track 7 NFT coins, 6 of them rated below.
What is the total market cap of NFT crypto coins?
The 6 NFT coins on this page with a current market cap were worth about $467M together, by CoinGecko's reading of 5 November 2026. Individual figures are in the table.
Are NFT crypto coins outperforming Bitcoin?
NFT has returned -31% versus Bitcoin over 52 weeks and -13.4% over 13 weeks on an equal-weight current-member index. 0/6 covered assets are above their 200-day averages as of 2026-10-30.
Which NFT asset has the strongest research score?
Audius ranks first at 49.7/100: 15.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.5 = 49.7. It is labelled “Price-led, little network data” with 50% overall evidence and 0% native-economics evidence.
Why are some NFT coins not rated?
1 of the 7 coins is not rated this week: 1 reports no traded volume. They stay listed with the reason beside each one rather than being scored at a neutral midpoint, because a missing reading is not a middling reading.
How is the NFT 4-factor score calculated?
The exact sum is Market leadership /35 + Network and economic traction /30 + Value capture /20 + Liquidity and downside risk /15. Missing data pulls only the affected factor toward neutral and lowers evidence; it is never silently reweighted.
Why can a NFT asset be labelled price-led?
Price-led means price and relative-strength evidence exists but less than half of the native traction and value-capture evidence is available. Such assets remain visible but rank below fully evidenced assets.
Does protocol revenue accrue to the token?
Not necessarily. Protocol fees and revenue measure network economics; token-holder value depends on the protocol’s burn, buyback, staking, distribution and governance rules. This page never assumes accrual merely because revenue exists.
Does crypto have a P/E or PEG ratio?
No comparable company-style P/E or PEG is used. Where coverage permits, the page shows network fee yield and protocol-revenue yield against a dated market-cap snapshot, with an explicit token-accrual caveat.
How much history is shown for NFT?
The page shows five years of weekly price and relative-strength history and 20 complete calendar quarters of on-chain activity where available. Missing periods remain gaps.
Why do the crypto data dates differ?
Prices and technical metrics run through 2026-10-30; protocol activity through 2026-10-30; chain users and transactions through the latest available chain date; chain TVL through the latest available chain-TVL date; market capitalisation is a separate snapshot dated 2026-11-05.
Are stablecoins and wrapped tokens included in NFT?
No. Pegged, wrapped, liquid-staking receipt and tokenized-asset instruments are excluded because they do not have independent price discovery.
Can one token appear in multiple raw crypto categories?
Yes, but pages on this site assign each asset to exactly one functional theme using a specific-to-general first-match taxonomy. NFT therefore has one canonical membership list.
What would invalidate the current NFT theme read?
Two of the three weakening conditions are already in place as of 2026-10-30: the 13-week return versus Bitcoin is -13.4% (below zero) and 0 of 6 covered assets are above the 200-day average (below one-third). The read depends on native protocol activity remaining supportive, a contraction there would complete the invalidation.
Does this page include funding rates, open interest or token unlocks?
No. Those datasets are not held in the current research store, so the page names them as unavailable rather than inferring them from price.
Which projects are generating the most network fees?
Ethereum Name Service leads NFT crypto on Trailing 12-month fees at $3.9M. The one asset with comparable change data is not growing. Coverage is 1 of the 6 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q3 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if fee growth turns negative across two complete calendar quarters or fee coverage falls below the stated threshold.
Which projects convert activity into protocol revenue?
Ethereum Name Service leads NFT crypto on Trailing 12-month revenue at $3.9M. The one asset with comparable change data is not growing. Coverage is 1 of the 6 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q3 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if revenue growth turns negative or the revenue-to-fees take rate falls for two complete calendar quarters.
Where is capital actually committed on-chain?
Magic Eden leads NFT crypto on Quarter-end TVL at $152.5K. Coverage is 1 of the 6 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q3 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.
Which NFT project has the largest fee base?
Ethereum Name Service leads covered trailing-12-month fees at $3.9M. Coverage is 1/6; this is network activity, not automatically token-holder income.
Which are the biggest NFT crypto coins by market cap?
Ethereum Name Service is the largest NFT crypto coin by market capitalisation at $203.5M, ahead of Chiliz at $124M and GAL (migrated to Gravity - G) at $61.3M. The 6 NFT coins on this page carry $466.6M between them, with a market-cap figure on file for 6 of them. Market-cap metadata is dated 2026-11-05.