Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-11
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
Five-year price · 20 complete calendar quarters · BTC-relative

Meme Crypto Coins

Is Meme outperforming Bitcoin, and is leadership broad?

Bottom line

Pump.fun ranks first for research priority in Meme crypto at 69.4/100, and its native activity proof is incomplete. The theme's 13-week excess versus Bitcoin is -12.2% on 32% breadth, which is what decides whether that lead is isolated or broad. 0 of the 52 assets here carry enough native evidence to move past a tape-led label.

These Meme coins are part of the cryptocurrency universe this site tracks daily — 894 of the top 1,000 crypto currency assets by market cap, priced from exchange closes and matched to protocol fees and revenue where a protocol publishes them.

The theme itself · before any single company

How has Meme moved against Bitcoin?

The line below covers up to 5 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this theme is 60% behind Bitcoin. Quarterly protocol revenue is not reported often enough here to draw a lane underneath the price.

FADING · −5 in 4w·Price down, no fundamental support8 of 69 coins ahead of Bitcoin by 5% or more over three months

RS — · 19/69 >200d (+3) · 8/69 lead (−5) · EPS —

10020050020262025202420232022 105315
10020050020262025202420232022 105315
Meme, equal-weighted, based at 200 Bitcoin, same base, same start trailing 12-month protocol revenue rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the theme line is an equal-weighted index of its 69 coins. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month protocol revenue, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the theme taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while protocol revenue grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

BTC LED market context

Meme vs Bitcoin — Relative Strength & Breadth

Meme crypto has outperformed Bitcoin by 4.4% over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of current members. Over 13 weeks the figure is -12.2%. 14 of 44 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Pump.fun leads Bitcoin-relative strength at +113.2%. Price readings are as of 2026-09-11.

-12%13w vs BTC
+4.4%52w vs BTC
14/44Above 200-DMA
PUMPRS leader · +113%
Assets
52
canonical functional membership
Activity-covered
0/52
enough native evidence
Top score
69.4/100
Pump.fun
Calendar quarters
20
complete; missing stays missing
Global asset selection · top 20 shown
Showing 20 of 52 assets
00 · exact additive research priority

4-Factor Crypto Evidence Score

A within-theme research-priority score for the 52 assets in Meme, out of 100. The four displayed point contributions add exactly to the total, and the market regime changes the action label, never the arithmetic. Pump.fun is highest at 69.4/100 on 50% evidence. It ranks research attention, not portfolio action.

Market leadership · 35Network & economic traction · 30Value capture · 20Liquidity & downside risk · 15
Pump.fun leads the current research queue at 69.4/100 with 50% evidence.
0/52 assets have enough native activity evidence to move beyond a tape-led label.

42 of the 94 Meme coins are not rated this week: 33 have no price within 7 days, 9 report no traded volume. They are listed in full below the ranking.

Missing native metrics are not scored as zero and are not silently reweighted. They pull only the affected factor toward neutral and lower its visible evidence percentage. An asset with nothing measurable at all is not scored at 50 either — it is listed as not rated.

1. Pump.fun · PUMP

69.4/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 34.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.2 = 69.4

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

34.2/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 113.2 pp · RS-sector 16.8 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

10.2/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $35,077,182 · vol 163.9%

100% evidence

2. BOOK OF MEME · BOME

65.3/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 30.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.3 = 65.3

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

30.0/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 77 pp · RS-sector -5.7 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

10.3/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $46,227,908 · vol 147.4%

100% evidence

3. dogwifhat · WIF

62.3/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 25.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.8 = 62.3

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

25.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -0.2 pp · RS-sector 27.9 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

11.8/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $52,439,203 · vol 107%

100% evidence

4. ORDI · ORDI

61.0/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 24.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 12.0 = 61.0

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

24.0/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -0.5 pp · RS-sector 1.4 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

12.0/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $15,748,895 · vol 92.1%

100% evidence

5. ConstitutionDAO · PEOPLE

60.4/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 26.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.0 = 60.4

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

26.4/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 22.4 pp · RS-sector -15.5 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

9.0/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $9,270,878 · vol 146.2%

100% evidence

6. Zerebro · ZEREBRO

59.0/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 24.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.0 = 59.0

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

24.0/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 12.5 pp · RS-sector -21.4 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

10.0/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $5,589,903 · vol 89.7%

100% evidence

7. Manifesting · MANIFEST

57.4/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 29.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.4 = 57.4

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

29.0/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 6.8 pp · RS-sector 16.1 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

3.4/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $1,135 · vol 121.7%

100% evidence

8. Pepe · PEPE

56.9/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 43% evidence

Exact sum: 20.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.4 = 56.9

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

20.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -4.1 pp · RS-sector 10.1 pp · 200-DMA —

80% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

11.4/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $27,816,359 · vol 121.7%

100% evidence

9. Dogs · DOGS

55.6/100 · Illiquid · research only · 43% evidence

Exact sum: 23.8 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.8 = 55.6

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

23.8/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -0.7 pp · RS-sector 35 pp · 200-DMA —

80% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

6.8/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $494,402 · vol 89.5%

100% evidence

10. Neiro · NEIRO

53.3/100 · Illiquid · research only · 43% evidence

Exact sum: 21.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.7 = 53.3

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

21.6/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -1.2 pp · RS-sector 11 pp · 200-DMA —

80% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

6.7/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $1,308,902 · vol 134.6%

100% evidence

11. Buttcoin · BUTTCOIN

52.7/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 22.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 4.8 = 52.7

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

22.9/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -4.1 pp · RS-sector 21.7 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

4.8/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $29,121 · vol 84.7%

100% evidence

12. Giggle Fund · GIGGLE

52.1/100 · Illiquid · research only · 43% evidence

Exact sum: 19.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.6 = 52.1

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

19.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 6.2 pp · RS-sector -16.2 pp · 200-DMA —

80% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

7.6/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $4,486,733 · vol 94.3%

100% evidence

13. MarsMi · MARSMI

51.9/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 19.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.5 = 51.9

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

19.4/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 5.7 pp · RS-sector 2.2 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

7.5/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $360,371 · vol 66%

100% evidence

14. Pudgy Penguins · PENGU

51.9/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 43% evidence

Exact sum: 17.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.7 = 51.9

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

17.2/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -12.7 pp · RS-sector 3.5 pp · 200-DMA —

80% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

9.7/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $9,564,039 · vol 121.9%

100% evidence

15. Fartcoin · FARTCOIN

50.6/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 15.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.7 = 50.6

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

15.9/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -0.9 pp · RS-sector -3 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

9.7/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $20,224,968 · vol 135.1%

100% evidence

16. The Black Bull · ANSEM

50.4/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 15% evidence

Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.9 = 50.4

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

17.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC — · RS-sector — · 200-DMA —

0% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

7.9/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $17,946,447 · vol 219.1%

100% evidence

17. Shiba Inu · SHIB

49.7/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 13.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.2 = 49.7

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

13.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -19.8 pp · RS-sector 11.6 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

11.2/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $70,750,873 · vol 209%

100% evidence

18. Utya · UTYA

49.3/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 20.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.6 = 49.3

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

20.7/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 1.1 pp · RS-sector -39 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

3.6/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $436,778 · vol 168.2%

100% evidence

19. Official Trump · TRUMP

49.3/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 43% evidence

Exact sum: 15.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.9 = 49.3

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

15.4/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -29.1 pp · RS-sector 27.4 pp · 200-DMA —

80% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

8.9/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $28,537,601 · vol 169.2%

100% evidence

20. Mog Coin · MOG

49.1/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 16% evidence

Exact sum: 14.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.1 = 49.1

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

14.0/35Market leadership

RS-BTC — · RS-sector — · 200-DMA below

20% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

10.1/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $8,356,629 · vol —

60% evidence

Showing 20 of 52 ranked assets
03 · complete calendar-quarter evidence

Where is capital actually committed on-chain?

FLOKI leads Meme crypto on Quarter-end TVL at $9M. 0 of 1 asset with comparable change data are growing. Coverage is 1 of the 52 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero.

LeaderFLOKI · $9M
GapNot comparable
Persistence0 assets have positive comparable growth
Coverage1/52 assets

Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.

This conclusion weakens if: TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.

Quarter-end TVL uses protocol TVL first for protocol assets and exact-ID chain TVL for chain assets or where protocol TVL is unavailable. A blank is unavailable, not zero. Growth compares with the same complete quarter one year earlier.
Quarter-end TVLtop five
1FLOKI FLOKI$9.0M
TVL growthtop five
1FLOKI FLOKI-62%
Total value locked · asset comparison
1/52 level · 1/52 change
Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first
AssetQuarter-end TVLTVL growth
pump-fun
book-of-meme
dogwifcoin
ordinals
constitutiondao
zerebro
manifesting
pepe
dogs-2
neiro-3
buttcoin-7
giggle-fund
marsmi
pudgy-penguins
fartcoin
the-black-bull
shiba-inu
utya
official-trump
mog-coin
Showing 20 of 52 assets
02 · let price answer last

Which assets lead on price and relative strength?

Pump.fun leads the Meme tape on Bitcoin-relative strength at +113% over 90 days. 14 of 44 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Price shows what happened; BTC-relative strength shows whether the asset beat crypto’s opportunity-cost benchmark. Both lines run through 2026-09-11.

Complete set · no silent drops

Which assets are in Meme?

52 of the 94 coins assigned to Meme are rated and ranked below, and the other 42 are listed under it with the reason each one is not rated — tape-only names that publish no protocol activity included. Each asset has exactly one canonical functional theme, chosen by a specific-to-general first match on its categories.

RankAssetPrice90dRS-BTC200-DMA30d volMedian volumePrice qualityActivity sourceScoreEvidence
1Pump.fun PUMP$0.0036+133%+113%Above164%$35.1Musabletape only69.450%
2BOOK OF MEME BOME$0.0009+97%+77%Above147%$46.2Musabletape only65.350%
3dogwifhat WIF$0.1917+20%-0.2%Above107%$52.4Musabletape only62.350%
4ORDI ORDI$4.00+19%-0.5%Above92%$15.7Musabletape only61.050%
5ConstitutionDAO PEOPLE$0.0078+42%+22%Above146%$9.3Musabletape only60.450%
6Zerebro ZEREBRO$0.0344+32%+12%Above90%$5.6Musabletape only59.050%
7Manifesting MANIFEST$0.0002+27%+6.8%Above122%$1.1Kusabletape only57.450%
8Pepe PEPE$0.0000+16%-4.1%122%$27.8Musabletape only56.943%
9Dogs DOGS$0.0001+19%-0.7%89%$494.4Kusabletape only55.643%
10Neiro NEIRO$0.0001+19%-1.2%135%$1.3Musabletape only53.343%
11Buttcoin BUTTCOIN$0.0002+16%-4.1%Above85%$29.1Kusabletape only52.750%
12Giggle Fund GIGGLE$34.65+26%+6.2%94%$4.5Musabletape only52.143%
13MarsMi MARSMI$0.0164+25%+5.7%Below66%$360.4Kusabletape only51.950%
14Pudgy Penguins PENGU$0.0073+7.1%-13%122%$9.6Musabletape only51.943%
15Fartcoin FARTCOIN$0.1437+19%-0.9%Below135%$20.2Musabletape only50.650%
16The Black Bull ANSEM$0.1377219%$17.9Mreturn withheld · discontinuitytape only50.415%
17Shiba Inu SHIB$0.00000.0%-20%Below209%$70.8Musabletape only49.750%
18Utya UTYA$0.0249+21%+1.1%Above168%$436.8Kusabletape only49.350%
19Official Trump TRUMP$1.98-9.3%-29%169%$28.5Musabletape only49.343%
20Mog Coin MOG$0.0000Below$8.4Musabletape only49.116%
Showing 20 of 52 assets

Not rated — and why

42 of the 94 Meme coins are not rated this week: 33 have no price within 7 days, 9 report no traded volume. Each one stays on this page with its reason instead of being scored at the midpoint of a range nothing measured.

CoinMarket capReasonDetail
MemeCore M$1.9BNo traded volume reportedNo traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
Peanut PEANUT$228.2MNo price this weekLast traded price is 2026-06-26, 77 days before this page's 2026-09-11 reading.
coco COCO$197.6MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Ape and Pepe APEPE$194.2MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Ribbita by Virtuals TIBBIR$107.1MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Cheems Token CHEEMS$100.1MNo traded volume reportedNo traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
Useless Coin USELESS$88.9MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Smilek to the Bank SMILEK$87.4MNo traded volume reportedNo traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
Melania Meme MELANIA$79.2MNo price this weekLast traded price is 2026-08-17, 25 days before this page's 2026-09-11 reading.
Comedian BAN$73.0MNo traded volume reportedNo traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
TROLL TROLL$71.1MNo traded volume reportedNo traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
Dog (Bitcoin) DOG$63.2MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Degen DEGEN$60.3MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Purr PURR$58.7MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Brett BRETT$55.0MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
APES APES$53.9MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Toshi TOSHI$50.4MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Popcat POPCAT$49.8MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Loaded Lions LION$48.0MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
OSK OSK$46.0MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-09-11.
Showing 20 of 42 not-rated coins
Methodology · boundaries make the answer useful

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Meme comparison names 5 ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. The largest is that crypto network activity is not company earnings: protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders. Coverage is also uneven — 0 of 52 assets carry enough native evidence to rank on more than price.

  • Crypto network activity is not company earnings. Protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders.
  • Market-cap values are a dated universe snapshot, not point-in-time historical supply data.
  • Current category labels are applied to historical prices; this creates survivorship and taxonomy hindsight.
  • Funding rates, open interest, liquidations, exchange flows, unlock schedules, historical circulating supply and developer activity are not held and are not inferred.
  • Equal weighting is used for sector history because true historical market-cap weights are unavailable.
Price and technicalsThrough 2026-09-11. Five-year weekly observations benchmarked to Bitcoin.
Protocol activityThrough 2026-09-11. Fees, revenue, protocol TVL and DEX volume.
Chain activityUsers and transactions through unavailable; separately sourced chain TVL through unavailable.
Market capSnapshot dated 2026-07-04; no historical supply series is implied.
Questions the page should answer directly

Crypto analysis FAQs

These 17 answers cover the questions this page can settle from data it holds — what the category is, how the score is built, what the coverage gaps are, and what would change the read. Every answer below is also present in the page’s FAQ schema and in its plain-text rendition. None of them is a recommendation.

What is Meme crypto?

Meme crypto refers to cryptocurrency projects grouped by what they actually do rather than by market fashion. This page tracks 52 such coins by market cap, price and Bitcoin-relative strength, with protocol fees and revenue where a project publishes them. Readings are as of 2026-09-11.

What is the total market cap of Meme crypto coins?

The 52 Meme coins on this page have a combined market cap of about $20.6B as of 2026-07-04. Individual figures are in the table. Market-cap metadata is a dated snapshot, separately from the price series.

Are Meme crypto coins outperforming Bitcoin?

Meme has returned +4.4% versus Bitcoin over 52 weeks and -12.2% over 13 weeks on an equal-weight current-member index. 14/44 covered assets are above their 200-day averages as of 2026-09-11.

Which Meme asset has the strongest research score?

Pump.fun ranks first at 69.4/100: 34.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.2 = 69.4. It is labelled “Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete” with 50% overall evidence and 0% native-economics evidence.

Why are some Meme coins not rated?

42 of the 94 coins are not rated this week: 33 have no price within 7 days, 9 report no traded volume. They stay listed with the reason beside each one rather than being scored at a neutral midpoint, because a missing reading is not a middling reading.

How is the Meme 4-factor score calculated?

The exact sum is Market leadership /35 + Network and economic traction /30 + Value capture /20 + Liquidity and downside risk /15. Missing data pulls only the affected factor toward neutral and lowers evidence; it is never silently reweighted.

Why can a Meme asset be labelled tape-led?

Tape-led means price and relative-strength evidence exists but less than half of the native traction and value-capture evidence is available. Such assets remain visible but rank below fully evidenced assets.

Does protocol revenue accrue to the token?

Not necessarily. Protocol fees and revenue measure network economics; token-holder value depends on the protocol’s burn, buyback, staking, distribution and governance rules. This page never assumes accrual merely because revenue exists.

Does crypto have a P/E or PEG ratio?

No comparable company-style P/E or PEG is used. Where coverage permits, the page shows network fee yield and protocol-revenue yield against a dated market-cap snapshot, with an explicit token-accrual caveat.

How much history is shown for Meme?

The page shows five years of weekly price and relative-strength history and 20 complete calendar quarters of on-chain activity where available. Missing periods remain gaps.

Why do the crypto data dates differ?

Prices and technical metrics run through 2026-09-11; protocol activity through 2026-09-11; chain users and transactions through the latest available chain date; chain TVL through the latest available chain-TVL date; market capitalisation is a separate snapshot dated 2026-07-04.

Are stablecoins and wrapped tokens included in Meme?

No. Pegged, wrapped, liquid-staking receipt and tokenized-asset instruments are excluded because they do not have independent price discovery.

Can one token appear in multiple raw crypto categories?

Yes, but pages on this site assign each asset to exactly one functional theme using a specific-to-general first-match taxonomy. Meme therefore has one canonical membership list.

What would invalidate the current Meme theme read?

Two of the three weakening conditions are already in place as of 2026-09-11: the 13-week return versus Bitcoin is -12.2% (below zero) and 14 of 44 covered assets are above the 200-day average (below one-third). The read depends on native protocol activity remaining supportive — a contraction there would complete the invalidation.

Does this page include funding rates, open interest or token unlocks?

No. Those datasets are not held in the current research store, so the page names them as unavailable rather than inferring them from price.

Where is capital actually committed on-chain?

FLOKI leads Meme crypto on Quarter-end TVL at $9M. 0 of 1 asset with comparable change data are growing. Coverage is 1 of the 52 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.

Which are the biggest Meme crypto coins by market cap?

Dogecoin is the largest Meme crypto coin by market capitalisation at $11.9B, ahead of Shiba Inu at $2.6B and Pepe at $1.1B. The 52 Meme coins on this page carry $20.6B between them, with a market-cap figure on file for 52 of them. Market-cap metadata is dated 2026-07-04.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI