Market cap is price times coins in circulation, from CoinGecko. The small words beside each coin are CoinGecko's own tags. A size ranking, not a pick.
What is Meme crypto?
Meme crypto coins are the coins CoinGecko tags as Meme, Solana Meme, AI Meme, Dog-Themed or 4chan-Themed. Each coin sits in one theme only: the first, most specific one its tags match. We track 76 Meme coins, 46 of them rated below.
Bottom line
Pepe ranks first for research priority in Meme crypto at 68.1/100, and its native activity proof is incomplete. The theme's 13-week excess versus Bitcoin is -23.5% on 23% breadth, which is what decides whether that lead is isolated or broad. 0 of the 46 assets here carry enough native evidence to move past a price-led label.
These Meme coins are part of the cryptocurrency universe this site tracks daily: the top 1,000 coins by market cap when the list was built, priced from exchange closes where we have a price we trust, and matched to protocol fees and revenue where a protocol publishes them.
The theme itself · before any single company
How has Meme moved against Bitcoin?
The line below covers up to 5 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this theme is 42% behind Bitcoin. Quarterly protocol revenue is not reported often enough here to draw a lane underneath the price.
ASLEEP · 1y −8.0%·Price down, no fundamental support10 of 57 coins ahead of Bitcoin by 5% or more over three months
Not ahead of Bitcoin right now; 20/57 >200d (+1); 10 of 57 ahead of Bitcoin by 5% or more over three months (6 fewer than four weeks earlier).
Meme, equal-weighted, based at 200Bitcoin, same base, same starttrailing 12-month protocol revenue risingfalling
Meme, equal-weighted, based at 200Bitcoin, same base, same starttrailing 12-month protocol revenue risingfalling
Meme, equal-weighted, based at 200Bitcoin, same base, same starttrailing 12-month protocol revenue risingfalling
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the gap between them tells the story: the theme line is an equal-weighted index of its 57 coins. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month protocol revenue, one bar per reported quarter, each member set to 100 at the start and the theme taking the middle value, so a price line pulling away from flat bars means the market is paying more for the same earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. The rules are fixed and the same everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while protocol revenue grew 20% or more. Hover or tap any point to read both values and the gap.
BTC LED market context
Meme vs Bitcoin: Relative Strength & Breadth
Meme crypto has outperformed Bitcoin by 38.3% over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of current members. Over 13 weeks the figure is -23.5%. 10 of 44 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Pump.fun leads Bitcoin-relative strength at +74%. Price readings are as of 2026-10-30.
-24%13 weeks vs Bitcoin
+38%52 weeks vs Bitcoin
10 of 44above their 200-day average
PUMPfurthest ahead of Bitcoin · +74%
Assets
46
canonical functional membership
Activity-covered
0/46
enough native evidence
Top score
68.1/100
Pepe
Calendar quarters
20
complete; missing stays missing
Global asset selection · top 20 shown
Showing 20 of 46 assets
00 · exact additive research priority
4-Factor Crypto Evidence Score
A within-theme research-priority score for the 46 assets in Meme, out of 100. The four displayed point contributions add exactly to the total, and the market regime changes the action label, never the arithmetic. Pepe is highest at 68.1/100 on 43% evidence. It ranks research attention, not portfolio action.
Pepe leads the current research queue at 68.1/100 with 43% evidence.
0 of 46 assets have enough native activity evidence to move beyond a price-led label.
30 of the 76 Meme coins are not rated this week: 7 have no price within 7 days, 23 report no traded volume. They are listed in full below the ranking.
Missing native metrics are not scored as zero and are not silently reweighted. They pull only the affected factor toward neutral and lower its visible evidence percentage. An asset with nothing measurable at all is not scored at 50 either: it is listed as not rated.
1. Pepe · PEPE
68.1/100 · Price-led, little network data · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 31.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.7 = 68.1
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +55.1 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +39.2 pts · above its 200-day average
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
11.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $28.4M · price swings: 92.8% a year
100% evidence
2. Pump.fun · PUMP
64.3/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 29.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.9 = 64.3
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +74 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −5.8 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
9.9/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $23.1M · price swings: 133.3% a year
100% evidence
3. Mog Coin · MOG
58.3/100 · Price-led, little network data · 19% evidence
Exact sum: 21.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 12.3 = 58.3
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): — · vs its theme (30 days): — · above its 200-day average
20% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
12.3/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $13.7M · price swings: —
80% evidence
4. Pudgy Penguins · PENGU
58.1/100 · Price-led, little network data · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 23.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.0 = 58.1
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +3.9 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +2 pts · above its 200-day average
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
10.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $7.0M · price swings: 80.3% a year
100% evidence
5. dogwifhat · WIF
56.7/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 21.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.6 = 56.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +8.2 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −4.6 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
10.6/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $47.2M · price swings: 82.1% a year
100% evidence
6. Animecoin · ANIME
55.3/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 25.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 4.9 = 55.3
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −6.7 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +8 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
4.9/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $195.5K · price swings: 150.1% a year
100% evidence
7. Baby Doge Coin · BABYDOGE
54.1/100 · Thinly traded · 19% evidence
Exact sum: 21.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.1 = 54.1
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): — · vs its theme (30 days): — · above its 200-day average
20% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
8.1/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $3.7M · price swings: —
80% evidence
8. Official Trump · TRUMP
53.5/100 · Price-led, little network data · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 18.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.0 = 53.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −12 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +1.7 pts · below its 200-day average
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
10.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $9.2M · price swings: 69.2% a year
100% evidence
9. FLOKI · FLOKI
53.0/100 · Price-led, little network data · 55% evidence
Exact sum: 19.8 + 12.5 + 10.0 + 10.7 = 53.0
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −1.5 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +10.7 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
12.5/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
17% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
10.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $25.5M · price swings: 86% a year
100% evidence
10. Dogecoin · DOGE
52.6/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 13.8 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 13.8 = 52.6
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −13.3 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +4.2 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
13.8/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $570.4M · price swings: 46.9% a year
100% evidence
11. Not in Employment, Education, or Training · NEET
52.2/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 23.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.8 = 52.2
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): +36.6 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −14.3 pts · below its 200-day average
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
3.8/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.2M · price swings: 143% a year
100% evidence
12. ConstitutionDAO · PEOPLE
50.9/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 16.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.3 = 50.9
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −12.1 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +0.4 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
9.3/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $5.8M · price swings: 60% a year
100% evidence
13. Araracoin · ARARA
50.6/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 18.8 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.8 = 50.6
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −21.1 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +24.5 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.8/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $14.0K · price swings: 4.4% a year
100% evidence
14. HUNDRED · HUNDRED
50.3/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 19.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.9 = 50.3
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −20.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +28.4 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
5.9/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.2K · price swings: 8.3% a year
100% evidence
15. Peanut the Squirrel · PNUT
49.0/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 15.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.0 = 49.0
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −16.3 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +0.4 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
9.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $5.8M · price swings: 69.7% a year
100% evidence
16. GEKKO · GEKKO
48.4/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 19.8 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.6 = 48.4
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −23.3 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +23.8 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
3.6/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $43.1K · price swings: 189.6% a year
100% evidence
17. BOOK OF MEME · BOME
48.1/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 15.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.8 = 48.1
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −10.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −13.1 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
7.8/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $9.3M · price swings: 139.6% a year
100% evidence
18. Notcoin · NOT
48.1/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 16.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.0 = 48.1
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −12.2 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −1.3 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
7.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $2.8M · price swings: 74.1% a year
100% evidence
19. FART COIN · FRTC
47.5/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 15.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.1 = 47.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −23 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +23.5 pts · above its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
7.1/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $21.9K · price swings: 3% a year
100% evidence
20. Theros · THEROS
47.5/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 16.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.5 = 47.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −12.2 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +2.7 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $40.4K · price swings: 40.8% a year
100% evidence
21. ORDI · ORDI
46.8/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 10.8 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.0 = 46.8
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −25.7 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −0.1 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
11.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $11.3M · price swings: 65.1% a year
100% evidence
22. Shiba Inu · SHIB
46.7/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 9.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 12.4 = 46.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −27.1 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +3.9 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
12.4/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $45.9M · price swings: 71.3% a year
100% evidence
23. GOHOME · GOHOME
45.8/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 13.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.7 = 45.8
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −14.3 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +18.8 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
7.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $316.2K · price swings: 16.8% a year
100% evidence
24. Zerebro · ZEREBRO
45.2/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 13.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.0 = 45.2
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −47.5 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +6.3 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
7.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $6.3M · price swings: 278.6% a year
100% evidence
25. Neiro · NEIRO
45.1/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 14.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.7 = 45.1
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −15.9 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −5.2 pts · below its 200-day average
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
5.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.0M · price swings: 66.8% a year
100% evidence
26. Bonk · BONK
45.0/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 9.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.1 = 45.0
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −23.6 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −1.5 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
10.1/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $32.2M · price swings: 114.8% a year
100% evidence
27. Turbo · TURBO
44.7/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 8.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.0 = 44.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −23.6 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +0.1 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
11.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $8.0M · price swings: 57.8% a year
100% evidence
28. 币安人生 (BinanceLife) · 币安人生
44.2/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 13.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.1 = 44.2
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −38.6 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +26.9 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.1/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.4M · price swings: 84.4% a year
100% evidence
29. YZY · YZY
43.1/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 11.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.2 = 43.1
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −23 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +25.6 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.2/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.4K · price swings: 29.3% a year
100% evidence
30. Siren · SIREN
42.4/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 12.8 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 4.6 = 42.4
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −40.2 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +16.1 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
4.6/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $2.3M · price swings: 410.7% a year
100% evidence
31. Fartcoin · FARTCOIN
41.8/100 · Price-led, little network data · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 6.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.2 = 41.8
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −25.9 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −7 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
10.2/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $12.1M · price swings: 73% a year
100% evidence
32. aixbt · AIXBT
41.2/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 9.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.6 = 41.2
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −21.8 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −1.2 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.6/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $2.7M · price swings: 68% a year
100% evidence
33. Giggle Fund · GIGGLE
40.1/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 8.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.2 = 40.1
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −55.1 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +0.4 pts · below its 200-day average
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.2/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $1.4M · price swings: 60.4% a year
100% evidence
34. Banana For Scale · BANANAS31
39.5/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 6.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.8 = 39.5
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −37.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): +1.1 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
7.8/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $3.3M · price swings: 47.7% a year
100% evidence
35. Dogs · DOGS
39.4/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 9.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 4.5 = 39.4
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −26.6 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −8.1 pts · below its 200-day average
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
4.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $316.4K · price swings: 77.3% a year
100% evidence
36. MarsMi · MARSMI
38.2/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 6.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.7 = 38.2
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −28.8 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −0.9 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.7/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $357.8K · price swings: 42.9% a year
100% evidence
37. pippin · PIPPIN
38.0/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 5.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.1 = 38.0
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −35.4 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −1.6 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
7.1/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $2.2M · price swings: 64.5% a year
100% evidence
38. AgentFun.AI · AGENTFUN
36.7/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 7.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 4.3 = 36.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −31 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −0.2 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
4.3/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $8 · price swings: 69.7% a year
100% evidence
39. Memecoin · MEME
36.2/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 6.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 4.3 = 36.2
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −34.6 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −0.4 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
4.3/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $19.8K · price swings: 72.1% a year
100% evidence
40. The Black Bull · ANSEM
35.9/100 · Price-led, little network data · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 4.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.0 = 35.9
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −98.6 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −42.3 pts · 200-day average: —
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.0/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $5.3M · price swings: 170.7% a year
100% evidence
41. BUILDon · B
35.7/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 4.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.5 = 35.7
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −49.2 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −6.4 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
6.5/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $3.6M · price swings: 77.1% a year
100% evidence
42. wojak · WOJAK
34.8/100 · Thinly traded · 43% evidence
Exact sum: 6.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.1 = 34.8
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −59.8 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −13 pts · 200-day average: —
80% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
3.1/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $183.2K · price swings: 112.2% a year
100% evidence
43. Utya · UTYA
33.1/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 4.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.2 = 33.1
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −72.6 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −15.3 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
3.2/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $367.6K · price swings: 142.1% a year
100% evidence
44. Unicorn Fart Dust · UFD
30.9/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 2.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.3 = 30.9
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −69.2 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −11.2 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
3.3/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $276.6K · price swings: 82.7% a year
100% evidence
45. PYTHIA · PYTHIA
28.9/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 2.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 1.4 = 28.9
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −122 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −70.7 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
1.4/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $38.9K · price swings: 406.1% a year
100% evidence
46. would · WOULD
27.3/100 · Thinly traded · 50% evidence
Exact sum: 1.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 1.2 = 27.3
What it means: Mostly a price reading: less than half of this score rests on the network's own use (fees, users, deposits), so it says little about the project itself yet.
vs Bitcoin (90 days): −110 pts · vs its theme (30 days): −41.4 pts · below its 200-day average
100% evidence
15.0/30Usage growth
Fees — · revenue — · users —
0% evidence
10.0/20Value capture
Fee yield — · revenue yield —
0% evidence
1.2/15Liquidity & risk
Typical daily trading: $12.0K · price swings: 144.3% a year
100% evidence
Showing 5 of 46 ranked assets
03 · complete calendar-quarter evidence
Where is capital actually committed on-chain?
FLOKI leads Meme crypto on Quarter-end TVL at $13.4M. The one asset with comparable change data is not growing. Coverage is 1 of the 46 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q3 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero.
LeaderFLOKI · $13.4M
GapNot comparable
Persistence0 assets have positive comparable growth
Coverage1 of 46 assets
Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.
This conclusion weakens if: TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.
Quarter-end TVL uses protocol TVL first for protocol assets and exact-ID chain TVL for chain assets or where protocol TVL is unavailable. A blank is unavailable, not zero. Growth compares with the same complete quarter one year earlier.
Quarter-end TVLonly one with data
1FLOKI FLOKI$13.4M
TVL growthonly one with data
1FLOKI FLOKI-52%
Total value locked · asset comparison
1 of 46 coins report it · 1 with a comparable change
Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first
Asset
Quarter-end TVL
TVL growth
Pepe PEPE
—
—
Pump.fun PUMP
—
—
Mog Coin MOG
—
—
Pudgy Penguins PENGU
—
—
dogwifhat WIF
—
—
Animecoin ANIME
—
—
Baby Doge Coin BABYDOGE
—
—
Official Trump TRUMP
—
—
FLOKI FLOKI
$13.4M
-52%
Dogecoin DOGE
—
—
Not in Employment, Education, or Training NEET
—
—
ConstitutionDAO PEOPLE
—
—
Araracoin ARARA
—
—
HUNDRED HUNDRED
—
—
Peanut the Squirrel PNUT
—
—
GEKKO GEKKO
—
—
BOOK OF MEME BOME
—
—
Notcoin NOT
—
—
FART COIN FRTC
—
—
Theros THEROS
—
—
ORDI ORDI
—
—
Shiba Inu SHIB
—
—
GOHOME GOHOME
—
—
Zerebro ZEREBRO
—
—
Neiro NEIRO
—
—
Bonk BONK
—
—
Turbo TURBO
—
—
币安人生 (BinanceLife) 币安人生
—
—
YZY YZY
—
—
Siren SIREN
—
—
Fartcoin FARTCOIN
—
—
aixbt AIXBT
—
—
Giggle Fund GIGGLE
—
—
Banana For Scale BANANAS31
—
—
Dogs DOGS
—
—
MarsMi MARSMI
—
—
pippin PIPPIN
—
—
AgentFun.AI AGENTFUN
—
—
Memecoin MEME
—
—
The Black Bull ANSEM
—
—
BUILDon B
—
—
wojak WOJAK
—
—
Utya UTYA
—
—
Unicorn Fart Dust UFD
—
—
PYTHIA PYTHIA
—
—
would WOULD
—
—
Showing 20 of 46 assets
02 · let price answer last
Which assets lead on price and relative strength?
Pump.fun leads the Meme tape on Bitcoin-relative strength at +74% over 90 days. 10 of 44 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Price shows what happened; BTC-relative strength shows whether the asset beat crypto’s opportunity-cost benchmark. Both lines run through 2026-10-30.
Complete set · no silent drops
Which assets are in Meme?
46 of the 76 coins assigned to Meme are rated and ranked below, and the other 30 are listed under it with the reason each one is not rated: price-only names that publish no protocol activity included. Each asset has exactly one canonical functional theme, chosen by a specific-to-general first match on its categories.
30 of the 76 Meme coins are not rated this week: 7 have no price within 7 days, 23 report no traded volume. Each one stays on this page with its reason instead of being scored at the midpoint of a range nothing measured.
No traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
Showing 20 of 30 not-rated coins
Methodology · boundaries make the answer useful
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Meme comparison names 5 ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. The largest is that crypto network activity is not company earnings: protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders. Coverage is also uneven: 0 of 46 assets carry enough native evidence to rank on more than price.
Crypto network activity is not company earnings. Protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders.
Market-cap values are a dated universe snapshot, not point-in-time historical supply data.
Current category labels are applied to historical prices; this creates survivorship and taxonomy hindsight.
Funding rates, open interest, liquidations, exchange flows, unlock schedules, historical circulating supply and developer activity are not held and are not inferred.
Equal weighting is used for sector history because true historical market-cap weights are unavailable.
Price and technicalsThrough 2026-10-30. Five-year weekly observations benchmarked to Bitcoin.
Protocol activityThrough 2026-10-30. Fees, revenue, protocol TVL and DEX volume.
Chain activityUsers and transactions: not published for these coins; chain TVL: not published for these coins.
Market capSnapshot dated 2026-11-05; no historical supply series is implied.
Questions the page should answer directly
Crypto analysis FAQs
These 17 answers cover the questions this page can settle from data it holds: what the category is, how the score is built, what the coverage gaps are, and what would change the read. Every answer below is also present in the page’s FAQ schema and in its plain-text rendition. None of them is a recommendation.
What is Meme crypto?
Meme crypto coins are the coins CoinGecko tags as Meme, Solana Meme, AI Meme, Dog-Themed or 4chan-Themed. Each coin sits in one theme only: the first, most specific one its tags match. We track 76 Meme coins, 46 of them rated below.
What is the total market cap of Meme crypto coins?
The 45 Meme coins on this page with a current market cap were worth about $21.7 billion together, by CoinGecko's reading of 5 November 2026. 1 more have only an older reading, so they are not counted. Individual figures are in the table.
Are Meme crypto coins outperforming Bitcoin?
Meme has returned +38.3% versus Bitcoin over 52 weeks and -23.5% over 13 weeks on an equal-weight current-member index. 10/44 covered assets are above their 200-day averages as of 2026-10-30.
Which Meme asset has the strongest research score?
Pepe ranks first at 68.1/100: 31.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.7 = 68.1. It is labelled “Price-led, little network data” with 43% overall evidence and 0% native-economics evidence.
Why are some Meme coins not rated?
30 of the 76 coins are not rated this week: 7 have no price within 7 days, 23 report no traded volume. They stay listed with the reason beside each one rather than being scored at a neutral midpoint, because a missing reading is not a middling reading.
How is the Meme 4-factor score calculated?
The exact sum is Market leadership /35 + Network and economic traction /30 + Value capture /20 + Liquidity and downside risk /15. Missing data pulls only the affected factor toward neutral and lowers evidence; it is never silently reweighted.
Why can a Meme asset be labelled price-led?
Price-led means price and relative-strength evidence exists but less than half of the native traction and value-capture evidence is available. Such assets remain visible but rank below fully evidenced assets.
Does protocol revenue accrue to the token?
Not necessarily. Protocol fees and revenue measure network economics; token-holder value depends on the protocol’s burn, buyback, staking, distribution and governance rules. This page never assumes accrual merely because revenue exists.
Does crypto have a P/E or PEG ratio?
No comparable company-style P/E or PEG is used. Where coverage permits, the page shows network fee yield and protocol-revenue yield against a dated market-cap snapshot, with an explicit token-accrual caveat.
How much history is shown for Meme?
The page shows five years of weekly price and relative-strength history and 20 complete calendar quarters of on-chain activity where available. Missing periods remain gaps.
Why do the crypto data dates differ?
Prices and technical metrics run through 2026-10-30; protocol activity through 2026-10-30; chain users and transactions through the latest available chain date; chain TVL through the latest available chain-TVL date; market capitalisation is a separate snapshot dated 2026-11-05.
Are stablecoins and wrapped tokens included in Meme?
No. Pegged, wrapped, liquid-staking receipt and tokenized-asset instruments are excluded because they do not have independent price discovery.
Can one token appear in multiple raw crypto categories?
Yes, but pages on this site assign each asset to exactly one functional theme using a specific-to-general first-match taxonomy. Meme therefore has one canonical membership list.
What would invalidate the current Meme theme read?
Two of the three weakening conditions are already in place as of 2026-10-30: the 13-week return versus Bitcoin is -23.5% (below zero) and 10 of 44 covered assets are above the 200-day average (below one-third). The read depends on native protocol activity remaining supportive, a contraction there would complete the invalidation.
Does this page include funding rates, open interest or token unlocks?
No. Those datasets are not held in the current research store, so the page names them as unavailable rather than inferring them from price.
Where is capital actually committed on-chain?
FLOKI leads Meme crypto on Quarter-end TVL at $13.4M. The one asset with comparable change data is not growing. Coverage is 1 of the 46 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q3 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.
Which are the biggest Meme crypto coins by market cap?
Dogecoin is the largest Meme crypto coin by market capitalisation at $11.7B, ahead of Shiba Inu at $2.8B and Pepe at $2.1B. The 46 Meme coins on this page carry $21.7B between them, with a market-cap figure on file for 45 of them. Market-cap metadata is dated 2026-11-05.