Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-31
Five-year price · 20 complete calendar quarters · BTC-relative

Meme Crypto Coins

Is Meme outperforming Bitcoin, and is leadership broad?

Bottom line

BOOK OF MEME ranks first for research priority in Meme crypto at 66.4/100, and its native activity proof is incomplete. The theme's 13-week excess versus Bitcoin is +14.5% on 23% breadth, which is what decides whether that lead is isolated or broad. 0 of the 52 assets here carry enough native evidence to move past a tape-led label.

These Meme coins are part of the cryptocurrency universe this site tracks daily — 894 of the top 1,000 crypto currency assets by market cap, priced from exchange closes and matched to protocol fees and revenue where a protocol publishes them.

The theme itself · before any single company

How has Meme moved against Bitcoin?

The line below covers up to 5 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this theme is 52% behind Bitcoin. Quarterly protocol revenue is not reported often enough here to draw a lane underneath the price. It has been ahead of Bitcoin on a rolling three-month view for 32 weeks running.

LEADER · ahead 32w·Price down, no fundamental support28 of 69 coins ahead of Bitcoin by 5% or more over three months

RS ↑32w · 16/69 >200d (+6) · 28/69 lead (−6) · EPS —

10020050020262025202420232022 112258
10020050020262025202420232022 112258
Meme, equal-weighted, based at 200 Bitcoin, same base, same start trailing 12-month protocol revenue rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the theme line is an equal-weighted index of its 69 coins. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month protocol revenue, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the theme taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while protocol revenue grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

RISK OFF market context

Meme vs Bitcoin — Relative Strength & Breadth

Meme crypto has outperformed Bitcoin by 54.8% over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of current members. Over 13 weeks the figure is +14.5%. 9 of 40 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Utya leads Bitcoin-relative strength at +144.8%. Price readings are as of 2026-07-31.

+15%13w vs BTC
+55%52w vs BTC
9/40Above 200-DMA
UTYARS leader · +145%
Assets
52
canonical functional membership
Activity-covered
0/52
enough native evidence
Top score
66.4/100
BOOK OF MEME
Calendar quarters
20
complete; missing stays missing
Global asset selection · top 20 shown
Showing 20 of 52 assets
00 · exact additive research priority

4-Factor Crypto Evidence Score

A within-theme research-priority score for the 52 assets in Meme, out of 100. The four displayed point contributions add exactly to the total, and the market regime changes the action label, never the arithmetic. BOOK OF MEME is highest at 66.4/100 on 50% evidence. It ranks research attention, not portfolio action.

Market leadership · 35Network & economic traction · 30Value capture · 20Liquidity & downside risk · 15
BOOK OF MEME leads the current research queue at 66.4/100 with 50% evidence.
0/52 assets have enough native activity evidence to move beyond a tape-led label.

42 of the 94 Meme coins are not rated this week: 31 have no price within 7 days, 11 report no traded volume. They are listed in full below the ranking.

Missing native metrics are not scored as zero and are not silently reweighted. They pull only the affected factor toward neutral and lower its visible evidence percentage. An asset with nothing measurable at all is not scored at 50 either — it is listed as not rated.

1. BOOK OF MEME · BOME

66.4/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 30.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.8 = 66.4

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

30.6/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 27.9 pp · RS-sector 49.5 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

10.8/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $13,378,463 · vol 84.7%

100% evidence

2. Araracoin · ARARA

63.2/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 31.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.0 = 63.2

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

31.2/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 21.1 pp · RS-sector 7 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

7.0/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $14,748 · vol 1.6%

100% evidence

3. HUNDRED · HUNDRED

63.0/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 31.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.1 = 63.0

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

31.9/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 27.1 pp · RS-sector 8.3 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

6.1/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $1,286 · vol 25.7%

100% evidence

4. Utya · UTYA

62.7/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 34.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.2 = 62.7

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

34.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 144.8 pp · RS-sector 146.1 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

3.2/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $634,673 · vol 270.5%

100% evidence

5. Zerebro · ZEREBRO

61.9/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 28.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.6 = 61.9

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

28.3/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 50.1 pp · RS-sector -6.7 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

8.6/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $8,418,787 · vol 143.9%

100% evidence

6. would · WOULD

59.2/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 27.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.3 = 59.2

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

27.9/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 17.1 pp · RS-sector -0.3 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

6.3/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $11,016 · vol 35.6%

100% evidence

7. Manifesting · MANIFEST

58.4/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 31.2 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 2.2 = 58.4

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

31.2/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 54.6 pp · RS-sector 2.9 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

2.2/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $32 · vol 95.3%

100% evidence

8. Shiba Inu · SHIB

55.6/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 19.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.6 = 55.6

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

19.0/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 3.5 pp · RS-sector 32 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

11.6/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $58,699,093 · vol 77.8%

100% evidence

9. YZY · YZY

55.2/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 22.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.5 = 55.2

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

22.7/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 15.3 pp · RS-sector 6.8 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

7.5/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $121,523 · vol 3.7%

100% evidence

10. Pepe · PEPE

54.3/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 12% evidence

Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.8 = 54.3

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

17.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC — · RS-sector — · 200-DMA —

0% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

11.8/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $15,813,005 · vol —

80% evidence

11. ConstitutionDAO · PEOPLE

54.1/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 20.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.0 = 54.1

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

20.1/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 4.4 pp · RS-sector 40 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

9.0/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $5,581,024 · vol 68.3%

100% evidence

12. ORDI · ORDI

52.4/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 16.8 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.6 = 52.4

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

16.8/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -14 pp · RS-sector 13.1 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

10.6/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $18,261,496 · vol 83.9%

100% evidence

13. GEKKO · GEKKO

52.3/100 · Illiquid · research only · 42% evidence

Exact sum: 19.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.4 = 52.3

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

19.9/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 20.1 pp · RS-sector 7 pp · 200-DMA below

77% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

7.4/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $19,596 · vol 0%

100% evidence

14. Pump.fun · PUMP

52.1/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 12% evidence

Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.6 = 52.1

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

17.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC — · RS-sector — · 200-DMA —

0% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

9.6/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $8,310,725 · vol —

80% evidence

15. Unicorn Fart Dust · UFD

51.9/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 21.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.5 = 51.9

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

21.4/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 33.4 pp · RS-sector -19.8 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

5.5/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $2,010,378 · vol 78.4%

100% evidence

16. Official Trump · TRUMP

51.8/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 12% evidence

Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.3 = 51.8

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

17.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC — · RS-sector — · 200-DMA —

0% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

9.3/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $5,346,278 · vol —

80% evidence

17. The Black Bull · ANSEM

51.4/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 15% evidence

Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.9 = 51.4

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

17.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC — · RS-sector — · 200-DMA —

0% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

8.9/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $33,688,813 · vol 346.2%

100% evidence

18. 币安人生 (BinanceLife) · 币安人生

51.1/100 · Illiquid · research only · 12% evidence

Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.6 = 51.1

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

17.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC — · RS-sector — · 200-DMA —

0% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

8.6/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $4,122,792 · vol —

80% evidence

19. Pudgy Penguins · PENGU

51.0/100 · Illiquid · research only · 12% evidence

Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.5 = 51.0

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

17.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC — · RS-sector — · 200-DMA —

0% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

8.5/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $4,255,753 · vol —

80% evidence

20. Giggle Fund · GIGGLE

50.0/100 · Illiquid · research only · 12% evidence

Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.5 = 50.0

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

17.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC — · RS-sector — · 200-DMA —

0% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

7.5/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $1,529,002 · vol —

80% evidence

Showing 20 of 52 ranked assets
03 · complete calendar-quarter evidence

Where is capital actually committed on-chain?

FLOKI leads Meme crypto on Quarter-end TVL at $9M, 23% ahead of Dogecoin. 0 of 2 assets with comparable change data are growing. Coverage is 2 of the 52 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero.

LeaderFLOKI · $9M
Gap23% versus #2
Persistence0 assets have positive comparable growth
Coverage2/52 assets

Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.

This conclusion weakens if: TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.

Quarter-end TVL uses protocol TVL first for protocol assets and exact-ID chain TVL for chain assets or where protocol TVL is unavailable. A blank is unavailable, not zero. Growth compares with the same complete quarter one year earlier.
Quarter-end TVLtop five
1FLOKI FLOKI$9.0M
2Dogecoin DOGE$7.4M
TVL growthtop five
1Dogecoin DOGE-54%
2FLOKI FLOKI-62%
Total value locked · asset comparison
2/52 level · 2/52 change
Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first
AssetQuarter-end TVLTVL growth
book-of-meme——
araracoin——
hundred——
utya——
zerebro——
would——
manifesting——
shiba-inu——
yzy——
pepe——
constitutiondao——
ordinals——
gekko——
pump-fun——
unicorn-fart-dust——
official-trump——
the-black-bull——
bianrensheng——
pudgy-penguins——
giggle-fund——
Showing 20 of 52 assets
02 · let price answer last

Which assets lead on price and relative strength?

Utya leads the Meme tape on Bitcoin-relative strength at +145% over 90 days. 9 of 40 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Price shows what happened; BTC-relative strength shows whether the asset beat crypto’s opportunity-cost benchmark. Both lines run through 2026-07-31.

Complete set · no silent drops

Which assets are in Meme?

52 of the 94 coins assigned to Meme are rated and ranked below, and the other 42 are listed under it with the reason each one is not rated — tape-only names that publish no protocol activity included. Each asset has exactly one canonical functional theme, chosen by a specific-to-general first match on its categories.

RankAssetPrice90dRS-BTC200-DMA30d volMedian volumePrice qualityActivity sourceScoreEvidence
1BOOK OF MEME BOME$0.0006+7.7%+28%Above85%$13.4Musabletape only66.450%
2Araracoin ARARA$0.0004+0.9%+21%Above2%$14.7Kusabletape only63.250%
3HUNDRED HUNDRED$0.0002+7.0%+27%Above26%$1.3Kusabletape only63.050%
4Utya UTYA$0.0402+125%+145%Above270%$634.7Kusabletape only62.750%
5Zerebro ZEREBRO$0.0341+30%+50%Above144%$8.4Musabletape only61.950%
6would WOULD$0.0776-3.0%+17%Above36%$11.0Kusabletape only59.250%
7Manifesting MANIFEST$0.0002+34%+55%Above95%$32usabletape only58.450%
8Shiba Inu SHIB$0.0000-17%+3.5%Below78%$58.7Musabletape only55.650%
9YZY YZY$0.2941-4.8%+15%Below4%$121.5Kusabletape only55.250%
10Pepe PEPE$0.0000————$15.8Musabletape only54.312%
11ConstitutionDAO PEOPLE$0.0067-16%+4.4%Below68%$5.6Musabletape only54.150%
12ORDI ORDI$3.63-34%-14%Above84%$18.3Musabletape only52.450%
13GEKKO GEKKO$0.00000.0%+20%Below0%$19.6Kusabletape only52.342%
14Pump.fun PUMP$0.0019————$8.3Musabletape only52.112%
15Unicorn Fart Dust UFD$0.0093+13%+33%Below78%$2.0Musabletape only51.950%
16Official Trump TRUMP$1.43————$5.3Musabletape only51.812%
17The Black Bull ANSEM$0.1752———346%$33.7Mreturn withheld · discontinuitytape only51.415%
18币安人生 (BinanceLife) 币安人生$0.6312————$4.1Musabletape only51.112%
19Pudgy Penguins PENGU$0.0058————$4.3Musabletape only51.012%
20Giggle Fund GIGGLE$25.43————$1.5Musabletape only50.012%
Showing 20 of 52 assets

Not rated — and why

42 of the 94 Meme coins are not rated this week: 31 have no price within 7 days, 11 report no traded volume. Each one stays on this page with its reason instead of being scored at the midpoint of a range nothing measured.

CoinMarket capReasonDetail
MemeCore M$1.9BNo traded volume reportedNo traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
Peanut PEANUT$228.2MNo price this weekLast traded price is 2026-06-26, 35 days before this page's 2026-07-31 reading.
coco COCO$197.6MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-07-31.
Ape and Pepe APEPE$194.2MNo price this weekLast traded price is 2026-05-22, 70 days before this page's 2026-07-31 reading.
Ribbita by Virtuals TIBBIR$107.1MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-07-31.
Cheems Token CHEEMS$100.1MNo traded volume reportedNo traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
Useless Coin USELESS$88.9MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-07-31.
Melania Meme MELANIA$79.2MNo traded volume reportedNo traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
Comedian BAN$73.0MNo traded volume reportedNo traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
TROLL TROLL$71.1MNo traded volume reportedNo traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
Dog (Bitcoin) DOG$63.2MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-07-31.
Degen DEGEN$60.3MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-07-31.
Purr PURR$58.7MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-07-31.
Brett BRETT$55.0MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-07-31.
APES APES$53.9MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-07-31.
AgentFun.AI AGENTFUN$51.6MNo traded volume reportedNo traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
Toshi TOSHI$50.4MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-07-31.
Popcat POPCAT$49.8MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-07-31.
Loaded Lions LION$48.0MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-07-31.
OSK OSK$46.0MNo price this weekNo traded price in the 95 days to 2026-07-31.
Showing 20 of 42 not-rated coins
Methodology · boundaries make the answer useful

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Meme comparison names 5 ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. The largest is that crypto network activity is not company earnings: protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders. Coverage is also uneven — 0 of 52 assets carry enough native evidence to rank on more than price.

  • Crypto network activity is not company earnings. Protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders.
  • Market-cap values are a dated universe snapshot, not point-in-time historical supply data.
  • Current category labels are applied to historical prices; this creates survivorship and taxonomy hindsight.
  • Funding rates, open interest, liquidations, exchange flows, unlock schedules, historical circulating supply and developer activity are not held and are not inferred.
  • Equal weighting is used for sector history because true historical market-cap weights are unavailable.
Price and technicalsThrough 2026-07-31. Five-year weekly observations benchmarked to Bitcoin.
Protocol activityThrough 2026-07-31. Fees, revenue, protocol TVL and DEX volume.
Chain activityUsers and transactions through unavailable; separately sourced chain TVL through 2026-07-25.
Market capSnapshot dated 2026-07-04; no historical supply series is implied.
Questions the page should answer directly

Crypto analysis FAQs

These 17 answers cover the questions this page can settle from data it holds — what the category is, how the score is built, what the coverage gaps are, and what would change the read. Every answer below is also present in the page’s FAQ schema and in its plain-text rendition. None of them is a recommendation.

What is Meme crypto?

Meme crypto refers to cryptocurrency projects grouped by what they actually do rather than by market fashion. This page tracks 52 such coins by market cap, price and Bitcoin-relative strength, with protocol fees and revenue where a project publishes them. Readings are as of 2026-07-31.

What is the total market cap of Meme crypto coins?

The Meme coins on this page are tracked against a universe of 894 of the top 1,000 crypto currency assets by market cap. Market-cap metadata is dated 2026-07-04, separately from the price series, and each coin's own figure is in the table on this page.

Are Meme crypto coins outperforming Bitcoin?

Meme has returned +54.8% versus Bitcoin over 52 weeks and +14.5% over 13 weeks on an equal-weight current-member index. 9/40 covered assets are above their 200-day averages as of 2026-07-31.

Which Meme asset has the strongest research score?

BOOK OF MEME ranks first at 66.4/100: 30.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.8 = 66.4. It is labelled “Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete” with 50% overall evidence and 0% native-economics evidence.

Why are some Meme coins not rated?

42 of the 94 coins are not rated this week: 31 have no price within 7 days, 11 report no traded volume. They stay listed with the reason beside each one rather than being scored at a neutral midpoint, because a missing reading is not a middling reading.

How is the Meme 4-factor score calculated?

The exact sum is Market leadership /35 + Network and economic traction /30 + Value capture /20 + Liquidity and downside risk /15. Missing data pulls only the affected factor toward neutral and lowers evidence; it is never silently reweighted.

Why can a Meme asset be labelled tape-led?

Tape-led means price and relative-strength evidence exists but less than half of the native traction and value-capture evidence is available. Such assets remain visible but rank below fully evidenced assets.

Does protocol revenue accrue to the token?

Not necessarily. Protocol fees and revenue measure network economics; token-holder value depends on the protocol’s burn, buyback, staking, distribution and governance rules. This page never assumes accrual merely because revenue exists.

Does crypto have a P/E or PEG ratio?

No comparable company-style P/E or PEG is used. Where coverage permits, the page shows network fee yield and protocol-revenue yield against a dated market-cap snapshot, with an explicit token-accrual caveat.

How much history is shown for Meme?

The page shows five years of weekly price and relative-strength history and 20 complete calendar quarters of on-chain activity where available. Missing periods remain gaps.

Why do the crypto data dates differ?

Prices and technical metrics run through 2026-07-31; protocol activity through 2026-07-31; chain users and transactions through the latest available chain date; chain TVL through 2026-07-25; market capitalisation is a separate snapshot dated 2026-07-04.

Are stablecoins and wrapped tokens included in Meme?

No. Pegged, wrapped, liquid-staking receipt and tokenized-asset instruments are excluded because they do not have independent price discovery.

Can one token appear in multiple raw crypto categories?

Yes, but public MLA pages assign each asset to exactly one functional theme using a specific-to-general first-match taxonomy. Meme therefore has one canonical membership list.

What would invalidate the current Meme theme read?

The read weakens if the sector’s 13-week relative return versus Bitcoin falls below zero, fewer than one-third of covered assets remain above the 200-day average, and the leading asset’s native activity also contracts.

Does this page include funding rates, open interest or token unlocks?

No. Those datasets are not held in the current research store, so the page names them as unavailable rather than inferring them from price.

Where is capital actually committed on-chain?

FLOKI leads Meme crypto on Quarter-end TVL at $9M, 23% ahead of Dogecoin. 0 of 2 assets with comparable change data are growing. Coverage is 2 of the 52 ranked assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.

Which are the biggest Meme crypto coins by market cap?

Dogecoin is the largest Meme crypto coin by market capitalisation at $11.9B, ahead of Shiba Inu at $2.6B and Pepe at $1.1B. The 52 Meme coins on this page carry $20.6B between them, with a market-cap figure on file for 52 of them. Market-cap metadata is dated 2026-07-04.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI