Synergy Green Industries Ltd
SGILSynergy Green Industries Ltd's price has outrun its earnings. +13.9% in a year against EPS −72.4% — the market is paying now for delivery later.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +13.9% in a year while annual EPS moved −72.4% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (12 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 100th percentile of its own 1-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating — profit −89.3% year on year, and 121% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Synergy Green Industries Ltd trades at ₹600, in a confirmed uptrend and 12 weeks into that stage. That is +11.0% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 93% of a 52-week range of ₹482 to ₹609. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 1 straight week.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 12 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹600 it trades +11.0% versus its 200-day average and sits at 93% of its 52-week range (₹482–₹609).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 7.9 years the stock moved +651% while the NIFTY 500 moved +152% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 1 straight week — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Synergy Green Industries Ltd trades at 188.0× P/E, about the priciest it has ever traded. Its long-run median P/E is 48.8×, measured across 1.0 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 188.0× is about the priciest it has ever traded, against a long-run median of 48.8× measured over 1.0 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −72.4% against a +13.9% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Synergy Green Industries Ltd reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — revenue growth is rising at +22.1% (single-quarter readings) while profit growth is falling at −89.3% (single-quarter readings) — the curves disagree, so the per-curve reads carry the story. The read is built from 10 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +1.1% | +8.1% | +13.0% | — |
| Profit | −70.6% | +71.0% | +10.8% | — |
| EPS | −72.4% | +75.0% | +7.9% | — |
| Share price | +13.9% | +45.3% | +26.1% | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
27.1/100 — rank 17 of 19 in Castings, Forgings & Fastners · 76% evidence confidence
Synergy Green Industries Ltd scores 27.1 out of 100 against the 19 companies it is compared with in Castings, Forgings & Fastners, ranking 17. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 4.2 + 7.4 + 8.5 + 7 = 27.1. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Synergy Green Industries Ltd reported ₹119 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +22.1% year on year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹366 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹366 Cr. A multi-year compound rate is not shown because the annual history behind it is too short to compute one honestly.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹366 Cr (+1.1% on the year). The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹119 Cr, +22.1% year on year.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +1.1% over the last 4 quarters against +6.0%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over; TTM profit −72.4% vs −36.5%/yr — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Synergy Green Industries Ltd's operating margin is 8.8% in the Mar 26 quarter, −6.5 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 9 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 8.0% to 16.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 8.8%, −6.5 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 9 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 8.0%–16.0%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −6.5 pp year on year while gross margin went −3.3 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Synergy Green Industries Ltd earned ₹0.4 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, −89.3% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹5.0 Cr. That is 0.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹3.8 Cr. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was ₹0.4 Cr, −89.3% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹5.0 Cr (−70.6%).
🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed +22.1% and the margin −6.5 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −60.8% vs revenue +0.9%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 121% of Synergy Green Industries Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹19.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹5.0 Cr of profit. After ₹183 Cr of capital spending, ₹−164 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹19.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹5.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−164 Cr after ₹183 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 121% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 121%: the cash cycle held roughly steady between FY21 and FY26 — so conversion tracks profitability rather than the cycle.
Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 5.8× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Synergy Green Industries Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 43 days in FY26, up from 35 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹262 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹366 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹1.0 Cr, so roughly ₹43.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 65 days, inventory at 164 days — roughly 5.4 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 43 days, looser than FY21's 35.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 164 days to sell; customers pay about 65 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 186 days — netting out to the 43-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹366 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹1.0 Cr — so the 43-day loop keeps roughly ₹43.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹262 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹45.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹47.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified
Synergy Green Industries Ltd earns a ROCE of 9% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 0% in FY12. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −7.8 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 1.4% net margin on 0.77× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 9%, recovered from a FY12 trough of 0% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 1.4% net margin × 0.77× asset turns × 4.22× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 4.5% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 4.2% − 12.0% = a −7.8 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified
Synergy Green Industries Ltd carries total debt of ₹250 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹111 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 2.25. On the annual view that ratio went from 2.41 in FY22 to 2.25 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of ₹250 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹111 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 2.25. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 2.41 (FY22) to 2.25 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Promoters cut 4.5 points of Synergy Green Industries Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 69.5% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −2.6 points over the same window, to 0.2%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Promoters: −4.5 points over 8 quarters to 69.5%; Foreign institutions: −2.6 points over 8 quarters to 0.2%; Domestic institutions: +1.0 points over 8 quarters to 1.7%.
🚨 Why the register moved: promoters drove it (−4.5 points), alongside foreign institutions (−2.6 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Synergy Green Industries Ltd: the Z-score reads 2.27. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits in the grey band between the two. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
Why it matters: a Z-score of 2.27 sits in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 2.27.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Uniparts India LtdUNIPARTS | 80.2/100Sector-leading setup96% evidence | LEADER | 31.1/35 Revenue 21.6% · PAT 78.4% · OPM change 10 pp 88% evidence | 17.5/25 ROCE 21.6% · OPM 24% 100% evidence | 13.4/20 P/E 20.4× · PEG 0.38 100% evidence | 18.2/20 RS sector 19.9% · RS bench 41.7% · 1Y 96.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 31.1 + 17.5 + 13.4 + 18.2 = 80.2 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Uni Abex Alloy Products Ltd504605 | 67.3/100Favorable setup78% evidence | LEADER | 22.1/35 Revenue 13.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5 pp 83% evidence | 18.0/25 ROCE 19.2% · OPM 31% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 19.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 17.1/20 RS sector 13.8% · RS bench 34.4% · 1Y 36.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 18 + 10.1 + 17.1 = 67.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Gala Precision Engineering LtdGALAPREC | 67.3/100Favorable setup76% evidence | LEADER | 27.1/35 Revenue 32.5% · PAT 34.6% · OPM change 1 pp 83% evidence | 14.2/25 ROCE 15.6% · OPM 18% 95% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 38.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.2/20 RS sector 9.3% · RS bench 29.4% · 1Y 27.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.1 + 14.2 + 9.8 + 16.2 = 67.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Sona BLW Precision Forgings LtdSONACOMS | 60.4/100Mixed-positive evidence97% evidence | LEADER | 22.8/35 Revenue 39.6% · PAT 18.1% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 14.2% · OPM 23% 95% evidence | 6.8/20 P/E 65.9× · PEG 3.04 100% evidence | 18.5/20 RS sector 21.8% · RS bench 44.1% · 1Y 63.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.8 + 12.3 + 6.8 + 18.5 = 60.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Happy Forgings LtdHAPPYFORGE | 58.4/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence | LEADER | 20.0/35 Revenue 9.8% · PAT 12.7% · OPM change 2 pp 88% evidence | 16.6/25 ROCE 18% · OPM 31% 100% evidence | 6.1/20 P/E 52.2× · PEG 1.69 100% evidence | 15.7/20 RS sector 15.6% · RS bench 36.4% · 1Y 72%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20 + 16.6 + 6.1 + 15.7 = 58.4 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 6Amic Forging Ltd544037 | 56.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | LEADER | 17.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5 pp 26% evidence | 20.2/25 ROCE 23.5% · OPM 33% 76% evidence | 7.6/20 P/E 72.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 11.3/20 RS sector -2.1% · RS bench 16.4% · 1Y 18.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.8 + 20.2 + 7.6 + 11.3 = 56.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7Balu Forge Industries LtdBALUFORGE | 56.6/100Mixed-positive evidence90% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.3/35 Revenue 19.9% · PAT 27% · OPM change -5 pp 88% evidence | 20.6/25 ROCE 22.7% · OPM 23% 100% evidence | 15.4/20 P/E 20.6× · PEG 1.46 100% evidence | 3.3/20 RS sector -27.9% · RS bench -18.5% · 1Y -29.5%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 20.6 + 15.4 + 3.3 = 56.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Bharat Forge LtdBHARATFORG | 56.1/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.1/35 Revenue 11.2% · PAT 19.1% · OPM change -1 pp 83% evidence | 12.6/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 17% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 93.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.4/20 RS sector 13.8% · RS bench 34.1% · 1Y 82.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.1 + 12.6 + 9 + 13.4 = 56.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Steelcast LtdSTEELCAS | 55.0/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 16.8/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT 15.2% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 18.9/25 ROCE 32.3% · OPM 26% 100% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 34.6× · PEG 1.7 100% evidence | 10.7/20 RS sector 6.5% · RS bench 25.9% · 1Y 32.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 18.9 + 8.6 + 10.7 = 55 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Kennametal India LtdKENNAMET | 54.7/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence | FADING | 19.5/35 Revenue 10.2% · PAT -4.3% · OPM change 2.1 pp 88% evidence | 16.9/25 ROCE 24.6% · OPM 16.1% 100% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 53× · PEG 1.53 100% evidence | 8.0/20 RS sector -1.3% · RS bench 16.8% · 1Y 23%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.5 + 16.9 + 10.3 + 8 = 54.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Tirupati Forge LtdTIRUPATIFL | 50.9/100Mixed-positive evidence76% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.0/35 Revenue 41.3% · PAT -19.9% · OPM change -2.1 pp 83% evidence | 8.2/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 9.2% 95% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 144× · PEG — 15% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 38.5% · RS bench 63% · 1Y 75.8%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14 + 8.2 + 8.7 + 20 = 50.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 63%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 12M M Forgings LtdMMFL | 47.9/100Mixed-negative evidence96% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 12.1/35 Revenue 4.3% · PAT -18.9% · OPM change -1 pp 88% evidence | 10.6/25 ROCE 9% · OPM 19% 100% evidence | 12.9/20 P/E 26.9× · PEG 0.66 100% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector 13.1% · RS bench 33.7% · 1Y 51.7%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.1 + 10.6 + 12.9 + 12.3 = 47.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13CIE Automotive India LtdCIEINDIA | 45.4/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.2/35 Revenue 12.5% · PAT 14.3% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 14.7% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 17.3× · PEG 2.4 100% evidence | 1.8/20 RS sector -22.6% · RS bench -7.6% · 1Y -1.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.2 + 14.3 + 10.1 + 1.8 = 45.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Nelcast LtdNELCAST | 41.7/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.3/35 Revenue 4.2% · PAT -1.8% · OPM change -3.9 pp 95% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 11.4% · OPM 4.6% 95% evidence | 11.8/20 P/E 25.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 2.3/20 RS sector -20.7% · RS bench -5.6% · 1Y -23.2%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.3 + 12.3 + 11.8 + 2.3 = 41.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Ramkrishna Forgings LtdRKFORGE | 40.7/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.8/35 Revenue 8.6% · PAT -71.3% · OPM change 4 pp 95% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE 5.6% · OPM 18% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 103× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.8/20 RS sector -2.6% · RS bench 16.3% · 1Y 4.2%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.8 + 7.3 + 8.8 + 9.8 = 40.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Alicon Castalloy LtdALICON | 35.2/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.7/35 Revenue 3% · PAT -25.2% · OPM change -1.8 pp 83% evidence | 10.1/25 ROCE 10% · OPM 9.2% 95% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 28.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -20.7% · RS bench -12.7% · 1Y -27%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.7 + 10.1 + 10.9 + 4.5 = 35.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Synergy Green Industries Ltdthis pageSGIL | 27.1/100Adverse evidence76% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 4.2/35 Revenue 1.1% · PAT -72.4% · OPM change -6.5 pp 83% evidence | 7.4/25 ROCE 9.2% · OPM 8.8% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 188× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.0/20 RS sector -8.2% · RS bench 9.6% · 1Y 8.6%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.2 + 7.4 + 8.5 + 7 = 27.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18Sterling Tools LtdSTERTOOLS | 25.6/100Adverse evidence77% evidence | TURNING | 6.2/35 Revenue -19.3% · PAT -49.7% · OPM change -5.7 pp 83% evidence | 8.0/25 ROCE 7.2% · OPM 3.6% 95% evidence | 7.4/20 P/E 38.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.0/20 RS sector -42.6% · RS bench -4.5% · 1Y -29.5%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.2 + 8 + 7.4 + 4 = 25.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Sundaram Clayton LtdSUNCLAY | 24.3/100Adverse evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 10.4/35 Revenue -3.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change -1.2 pp 74% evidence | 0.3/25 ROCE -3.3% · OPM 2% 100% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 11× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.1/20 RS sector -26.6% · RS bench -12% · 1Y -35.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.4 + 0.3 + 11.5 + 2.1 = 24.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Synergy Green Industries Ltd's share price today?
Synergy Green Industries Ltd trades at ₹600, +13.9% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹936 Cr. The stock sits at 93% of its 52-week range of ₹482–₹609, +11.0% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 12 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.
What were Synergy Green Industries Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Synergy Green Industries Ltd reported revenue of ₹119 Cr and net profit of ₹0.4 Cr for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 22.1% and profit fell 89.3% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹0.26. The operating margin was 8.8%, 6.5 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Synergy Green Industries Ltd's revenue?
Synergy Green Industries Ltd reported revenue of ₹119 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter, +22.1% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹366 Cr (+1.1%). — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Synergy Green Industries Ltd's profit?
Synergy Green Industries Ltd earned ₹0.4 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, −89.3% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹5.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 8.8% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Synergy Green Industries Ltd's market cap?
Synergy Green Industries Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹936 Cr at a share price of ₹600. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Synergy Green Industries Ltd's P/E ratio?
Synergy Green Industries Ltd trades at a P/E of 188.0×, at the 100th percentile of its own 1-year range, against a long-run median of 48.8×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Synergy Green Industries Ltd pay a dividend?
Yes — Synergy Green Industries Ltd's dividend payout was 33% of profit in FY26, and it recorded a payout in 2 of its last 9 reported fiscal years. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Synergy Green Industries Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Synergy Green Industries Ltd looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 188.0× sits at the 100th percentile of its 1-year range (long-run median 48.8×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Synergy Green Industries Ltd growing?
Not right now — Synergy Green Industries Ltd's latest numbers are shrinking: latest-quarter revenue +22.1% year on year, profit −89.3%, and the margin −6.5 pp at 8.8%. The earnings engine currently reads: deteriorating — as of 31 July 2026.
How is Synergy Green Industries Ltd performing?
Synergy Green Industries Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 12 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 22.1% and profit fell 89.3% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.
What stage is Synergy Green Industries Ltd in?
Mixed — revenue growth is rising at +22.1% (single-quarter readings) while profit growth is falling at −89.3% (single-quarter readings) — the curves disagree, so the per-curve reads carry the story. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +22.1% latest, profit growth −89.3% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Synergy Green Industries Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 12 of stage 2), trading +11.0% versus its 200-day average and at 93% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Synergy Green Industries Ltd beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Synergy Green Industries Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 1 straight week, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 7.9 years the stock moved +651% against the NIFTY 500's +152% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.
Will Synergy Green Industries Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Synergy Green Industries Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹600, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 12 weeks in. Its P/E of 188.0× sits at the 100th percentile of its own 1-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.
Who owns Synergy Green Industries Ltd?
Promoters hold 69.5% of Synergy Green Industries Ltd, foreign institutions 0.2%, domestic institutions 1.7% and the public 28.5% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Promoters cut 4.5 points over 8 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Synergy Green Industries Ltd have too much debt?
It carries real leverage — Synergy Green Industries Ltd's debt-to-equity is 2.23, and operating profit covers the interest bill 2×. FY26 borrowings were ₹250 Cr against equity of ₹112 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Synergy Green Industries Ltd's capex?
Synergy Green Industries Ltd spent ₹262 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹183 Cr, with ₹47.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Synergy Green Industries Ltd's cash flow?
Synergy Green Industries Ltd generated ₹19.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−164 Cr of free cash flow after ₹183 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹5.0 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Synergy Green Industries Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 121% of Synergy Green Industries Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹19.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹5.0 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.
How financially safe is Synergy Green Industries Ltd?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 2.27 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed. — as of 31 July 2026.
Where is Synergy Green Industries Ltd in its business cycle?
Synergy Green Industries Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 11.0%, against a 9-year band of 8.0%–16.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 8.8%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.
What could break the Synergy Green Industries Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +13.9% in a year while annual EPS moved −72.4% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Synergy Green Industries Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Synergy Green Industries Ltd's price has outrun its earnings. +13.9% in a year against EPS −72.4% — the market is paying now for delivery later. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.