Eternal Ltd · ETERNAL
₹1.0K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.9K Cr
₹2.1K Cr
₹2.4K Cr
₹2.8K Cr
₹3.3K Cr
₹3.6K Cr
₹4.2K Cr
₹4.8K Cr
₹5.4K Cr
₹5.8K Cr
₹7.2K Cr
₹13.6K Cr
₹16.3K Cr
₹17.3K Cr
₹20.2K Cr
20-quarter listed-company comparison
E-Commerce - Platform - Food Stocks in India
E-Commerce - Platform - Food: Eternal Ltd owns the largest revenue base AND the fastest current growth.
01 · the index people search for
Nifty E-Commerce - Platform - Food Index — Constituents & Performance
All 2 listed Indian E-Commerce - Platform - Food companies are named here, largest first — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty E-Commerce - Platform - Food index. Every figure on this page is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.
- Eternal Ltd₹3.1 L Cr
- Swiggy Ltd₹76.3K Cr
02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks
Is E-Commerce - Platform - Food outperforming NIFTY 500?
E-Commerce - Platform - Food has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 19.5% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 15.1%. 1 of 2 covered companies currently beats NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Eternal Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +6.6%.
+15.1%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
-19.5%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
1/2Stocks leading NIFTY 500
1/2Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: 20.2 as of 2026-08-09 · LEADERS · rising.
The central tension: current leadership is concentrated, so durability matters more than rank.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
E-Commerce - Platform - Food has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 19.5% over 52 weeks and 15.1% over 13 weeks. 1 of 2 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 2 beat the sector itself. Eternal Ltd leads with revenue of ₹67,408 crore, based on 2 of 2 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Companies
2
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹3.8 L Cr
Eternal Ltd
Revenue growing
2/2
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
1/2
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 2 of 2
03 · research priority, made explicit
Best E-Commerce - Platform - Food Stocks in India (Aug 2026), Ranked by Data
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Eternal Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 84% evidence confidence.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Top 10 E-Commerce - Platform - Food Stocks in India
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Eternal LtdETERNAL | 49.9/100Mixed-negative evidence84% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 26.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 44.8% · OPM change 1.3 pp 100% evidence | 1.2/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 2.9% 100% evidence | 5.0/20 P/E 710× · PEG 9.35 50% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 6.6% · RS bench 10.6% · 1Y 5.7%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.7 + 1.2 + 5 + 17 = 49.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Swiggy LtdSWIGGY | 37.5/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | TURNING | 27.5/35 Revenue 46.8% · PAT -1.2% · OPM change 9 pp 74% evidence | 0.0/25 ROCE -24.1% · OPM -10% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 0.0/20 RS sector -12.9% · RS bench -18.5% · 1Y -28.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.5 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 37.5 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -12.9% and the one-year return is -28.2%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
04 · what price has already done
Market action
Eternal Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in E-Commerce - Platform - Food at +5.7%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +10.6%. 1 of 2 covered companies is above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-08-14.
Price and relative strength
Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind NIFTY 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS NIFTY 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against E-Commerce - Platform - Food itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
05 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Eternal Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 2 E-Commerce - Platform - Food companies compared here, at ₹67,408 crore. Swiggy Ltd is next at ₹24,904 crore. The same company also holds the highest Revenue growth, at the 100% top of the scoring scale. 2 of 2 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Eternal Ltd is the scale leader at ₹67,408 crore, 170.7% ahead of Swiggy Ltd. Eternal Ltd's growth is stored at the ≥100% scoring cap; the uncapped TTM change is 190.5% from a ₹67,408 crore base, with 20 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderEternal Ltd · ₹67,408 crore
Gap170.7% versus #2 · Swiggy Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/2 companies · 33 observations
Investor read: Eternal Ltd is the scale benchmark; Eternal Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Eternal Ltd's growth falls below Eternal Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenue · company comparison
2/2 level · 2/2 change
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eternal Ltd ETERNAL | ₹20.2K Cr | 182% | Jun 2026 |
| Swiggy Ltd SWIGGY | ₹6.8K Cr | 37% | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Swiggy Ltd · SWIGGY
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹2.4K Cr
₹2.8K Cr
₹3.0K Cr
₹3.0K Cr
₹3.2K Cr
₹3.6K Cr
₹4.0K Cr
₹4.4K Cr
₹5.0K Cr
₹5.6K Cr
₹6.1K Cr
₹6.4K Cr
₹6.8K Cr
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Eternal Ltd · ETERNAL
—
—
—
68%
62%
75%
70%
71%
71%
69%
73%
74%
69%
64%
64%
70%
183%
202%
196%
182%
Swiggy Ltd · SWIGGY
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
35%
30%
31%
45%
54%
54%
54%
45%
37%
06 · compare level, then change
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
Eternal Ltd has the highest OPM among the 2 E-Commerce - Platform - Food companies compared here, at 2.9%. Swiggy Ltd is next at -10%. Swiggy Ltd has the highest Margin change at +9 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 2 of 2 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Eternal Ltd leads opm at 2.9%; Swiggy Ltd leads margin change at +9 percentage points.
LeaderEternal Ltd · 2.9%
Gap129% versus #2 · Swiggy Ltd
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/2 companies · 33 observations
Investor read: Eternal Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Operating margin · company comparison
2/2 level · 2/2 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eternal Ltd ETERNAL | 2.9% | +1.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Swiggy Ltd SWIGGY | -10% | +9.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Eternal Ltd · ETERNAL
-52%
-44%
-37%
-22%
-19%
-19%
-11%
-2.0%
-1.6%
1.6%
2.4%
4.2%
4.7%
3.0%
1.2%
1.6%
1.8%
2.3%
2.8%
2.9%
Swiggy Ltd · SWIGGY
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-24%
-23%
-17%
-16%
-17%
-15%
-18%
-22%
-19%
-14%
-13%
-11%
-10%
Margin change · reported quarter history
Eternal Ltd · ETERNAL
−23.7 pp
−25.8 pp
−14.9 pp
+22.9 pp
+33.5 pp
+25.0 pp
+26.1 pp
+19.7 pp
+17.2 pp
+20.6 pp
+13.4 pp
+6.2 pp
+6.3 pp
+1.4 pp
−1.2 pp
−2.6 pp
−2.9 pp
−0.7 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.3 pp
Swiggy Ltd · SWIGGY
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+7.0 pp
+8.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−6.0 pp
−2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+5.0 pp
+11.0 pp
+9.0 pp
07 · compare level, then change
Profit Scale & Acceleration
Eternal Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 2 E-Commerce - Platform - Food companies compared here, at ₹433 crore. Swiggy Ltd is next at ₹3,748 crore net cash. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at 44.8%. 2 of 2 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Eternal Ltd leads with ₹433 crore of TTM profit, 111.6% above Swiggy Ltd. Eternal Ltd shows 44.8% growth from a ₹433 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderEternal Ltd · ₹433 crore
Gap111.6% versus #2 · Swiggy Ltd
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/2 companies · 33 observations
Investor read: Eternal Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Profit growthfastest growers
Net profit · company comparison
2/2 level · 1/2 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eternal Ltd ETERNAL | ₹92 Cr | 268% | Jun 2026 |
| Swiggy Ltd SWIGGY | ₹-791 Cr | — | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Eternal Ltd · ETERNAL
₹-430 Cr
₹-63 Cr
₹-360 Cr
₹-186 Cr
₹-251 Cr
₹-347 Cr
₹-188 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹138 Cr
₹175 Cr
₹253 Cr
₹176 Cr
₹59 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹65 Cr
₹102 Cr
₹174 Cr
₹92 Cr
Swiggy Ltd · SWIGGY
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹-564 Cr
₹-657 Cr
₹-574 Cr
₹-555 Cr
₹-611 Cr
₹-626 Cr
₹-799 Cr
₹-1.1K Cr
₹-1.2K Cr
₹-1.1K Cr
₹-1.1K Cr
₹-800 Cr
₹-791 Cr
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Eternal Ltd · ETERNAL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
12,550%
389%
-57%
-78%
-90%
-63%
73%
346%
268%
08 · compare level, then change
Return On Capital Employed
Eternal Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 2 E-Commerce - Platform - Food companies compared here, at 2.5%. Swiggy Ltd is next at -24.1%. Swiggy Ltd has the highest ROCE change at +7.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 2 of 2 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Eternal Ltd leads ROCE at 2.5%, 26.6 percentage points above Swiggy Ltd. Swiggy Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +7.5 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderEternal Ltd · 2.5%
Gap110.3% versus #2 · Swiggy Ltd
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/2 companies · 26 observations
Investor read: Eternal Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
Return on capital · company comparison
2/2 level · 2/2 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eternal Ltd ETERNAL | 3.8% | +1.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Swiggy Ltd SWIGGY | -22% | +7.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Eternal Ltd · ETERNAL
-7.9%
—
-12%
—
-8.6%
-8.7%
-8.2%
—
-6.0%
0.0%
-2.3%
3.0%
-0.2%
4.1%
-0.7%
2.8%
-1.8%
2.8%
-1.1%
3.8%
Swiggy Ltd · SWIGGY
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-22%
-32%
-33%
-32%
-29%
-36%
-37%
-43%
-22%
—
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Eternal Ltd · ETERNAL
—
—
—
—
−0.7 pp
—
+3.8 pp
—
+2.6 pp
+8.7 pp
+5.9 pp
—
+5.8 pp
+4.1 pp
+1.6 pp
−0.2 pp
−1.6 pp
−1.3 pp
−0.4 pp
+1.0 pp
Swiggy Ltd · SWIGGY
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
−7.1 pp
−4.1 pp
−4.7 pp
−11.6 pp
+7.5 pp
—
09 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
Eternal Ltd has the lowest PEG among the 2 E-Commerce - Platform - Food companies compared here, at 9.35×. The same company also holds the lowest P/E, at 710×. 1 of 2 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Eternal Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 9.35×. Only 1 of 2 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderEternal Ltd · 9.35×
GapNot enough peers
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage1/2 companies · 1 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
P/Elowest P/E
Valuation · company comparison
1/2 level · 1/2 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eternal Ltd ETERNAL | 9.4 | 671.7 | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
Eternal Ltd · ETERNAL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9.4
—
—
—
—
P/E · reported quarter history
Eternal Ltd · ETERNAL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-80.0
-172.0
-8,857.9
447.7
500.9
403.3
322.8
268.7
444.3
972.9
1,482.1
971.2
671.7
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This E-Commerce - Platform - Food comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 2 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
11 · evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 2 E-Commerce - Platform - Food companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-14.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-14 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing2 cross-checked · 0 unverified · 0 withheld, of 2 graded companies.
How a second data feed is admitted, and what happens when it disagrees
A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers
E-Commerce - Platform - Food company comparison FAQs
These 23 answers restate the E-Commerce - Platform - Food comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 2 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-14. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the E-Commerce - Platform - Food sector outperforming NIFTY 500?
E-Commerce - Platform - Food has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 19.5% over 52 weeks and 15.1% over 13 weeks. 1 of 2 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 2 beat the sector itself.
Which E-Commerce - Platform - Food company is largest by revenue?
Eternal Ltd leads with revenue of ₹67,408 crore, based on 2 of 2 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Which E-Commerce - Platform - Food company is growing fastest?
Eternal Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 100%, across 2 of 2 comparable companies.
Which E-Commerce - Platform - Food company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Eternal Ltd ranks first at 49.9/100 with 84% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which E-Commerce - Platform - Food company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Eternal Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 9.35, among 1 of 2 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this E-Commerce - Platform - Food comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Is there a Nifty E-Commerce - Platform - Food index?
NSE India maintains Nifty indices for several broad sector categories — Nifty Bank, Nifty IT, Nifty Pharma and others — but not for every sub-sector grouping on this site. Whether or not an official Nifty index covers E-Commerce - Platform - Food, this page builds its own equal-weight basket of 2 listed E-Commerce - Platform - Food companies — one company, one vote, regardless of market value — so no single large company dominates the reading. Figures are as of Jun 2026.
Which are the best E-Commerce - Platform - Food stocks in India?
Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Eternal Ltd places first among 2 listed E-Commerce - Platform - Food companies, followed by Swiggy Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.
How many E-Commerce - Platform - Food stocks are listed in India?
This comparison covers 2 listed E-Commerce - Platform - Food companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.
Which E-Commerce - Platform - Food company is the biggest?
Eternal Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹67,408 crore, ahead of Swiggy Ltd at ₹24,904 crore. That covers 2 of 2 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.
Which E-Commerce - Platform - Food company has the best profit margins?
Eternal Ltd has the highest operating margin at 2.9%, from 2 of 2 comparable companies. Swiggy Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +9 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which E-Commerce - Platform - Food company makes the most profit?
Eternal Ltd earns the most, at ₹433 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 2 of 2 comparable companies. Eternal Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 44.8%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which E-Commerce - Platform - Food company earns the highest return on capital?
Eternal Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 2.5%, across 2 of 2 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which E-Commerce - Platform - Food stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Eternal Ltd screens cheapest at 9.35×. Only 1 of 2 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the E-Commerce - Platform - Food sector beating the market?
E-Commerce - Platform - Food has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 19.5% over the last 52 weeks and 15.1% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 1 of 2 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which E-Commerce - Platform - Food stock has the strongest price momentum?
Eternal Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which E-Commerce - Platform - Food company scores highest for research priority?
Eternal Ltd scores 49.9 out of 100 with 84% evidence confidence, from 26.7 points on growth and earnings, 1.2 on capital efficiency, 5 on valuation and 17 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many E-Commerce - Platform - Food companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 2 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the E-Commerce - Platform - Food sector?
The 2 E-Commerce - Platform - Food companies on this page carry ₹3,83,631 crore of combined market value. Eternal Ltd is the largest at ₹3,07,364 crore, about 80% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-20.
How is the E-Commerce - Platform - Food sector performing?
1 of the 2 covered E-Commerce - Platform - Food companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 19.5% behind NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-20.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.