TransIndia Real Estate share price today

TransIndia Real Estate Ltd's share price was ₹24.60 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been falling for 1 week. That is 7.6% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹23 and ₹30, and at that close it sat 22% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today TransIndia Real Estate Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the NIFTY 500, and it has stayed ahead for 13 weeks in a row.

Over the last 3.2 years the share price moved −28% while the NIFTY 500 moved +30%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

1. Promoters raised their stake for 4 quarters in a row

   From 70.3% to 71.8% of the company by the September 2026 quarter.

2. Operating margin down 11 points on a year earlier

   55% in the June 2026 quarter, from 66%.

For April to June 2026 (the quarter ended 30 June 2026), TransIndia Real Estate reported revenue of ₹22.0 crore, up 4.8% from ₹21.0 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹11.0 crore, up 57.1% from ₹7.00 crore.

TransIndia Real Estate results: April to June 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for July to September 2026, are due by 14 November 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 June 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

TransIndia Real Estate closed at ₹24.60 on 4 November 2026, down 15.3% from ₹29.04 a year earlier (7 November 2025) and down 41.7% over three years. Its highest weekly close since August 2023 was ₹56.84 on 23 February 2024.

TransIndia Real Estate share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 4 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

176 weekly closes from 11 August 2023 to 4 November 2026.

4 Nov 2026: TransIndia Real Estate closed at ₹24.60, up 2.8% on the week and down 10.0% on the month. Results for April to June 2026: Revenue up 4.8% and profit up 57.1% on a year earlier.

TransIndia Real Estate paid no dividend in the 12 months to 5 November 2026. The last was an interim dividend of ₹0.50 a share, ex-date 16 August 2024.

TransIndia Real Estate dividends since 1 April 2021

Amounts as the company declared them on the NSE. A dividend goes to whoever owns the shares before the ex-date. The record date is the same day as the ex-date for every payment here.

Not in its latest year. TransIndia Real Estate Ltd paid out 0% of its profit as dividends in FY26. It did pay a dividend in 1 of its last 5 reported years, so there is a history but no current dividend.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

TransIndia Real Estate is on one of our India lists: Penny stocks.

TransIndia Real Estate Ltd earned ₹11.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +57.1% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹37.0 Cr. That is 50.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹7.0 Cr.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹37.0 Cr (−30.2% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +4.8% on a year earlier and the margin moved −11.0 percentage points. Sales did the work while the margin got thinner.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +9.5% and revenue +1.5%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra rupee of revenue adds more to profit.

TransIndia Real Estate Ltd reported ₹22.0 Cr of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +4.8% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 2nd quarter in a row with growth on the year before. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹84.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹85.0 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

A growth rate over several years is not shown, because there are too few years of figures to work one out properly.

FY26 revenue was ₹84.0 Cr, +2.4% on the year before.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +1.2%, against −2.8% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating); profit over the last 12 months grew −26.8%, against −59.5% a year (accelerating).

TransIndia Real Estate Ltd's operating margin was 55.0% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 11.0 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 4 years it has been between 43.0% and 56.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −11.5 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +0.0 points. So the drop came mostly from costs below the gross margin, such as staff and overheads, measured against sales.

Over the last 3 years, 60% of TransIndia Real Estate Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so most of the profit is real cash. In FY26 it brought in ₹43.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹37.0 Cr of profit.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

After ₹64.0 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹21.0 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 60% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 40 days shorter between FY23 and FY26, so cash that used to wait in the business now arrives sooner. When less than 70% of profit comes in as cash, it is the thing to watch on this page.

What to look at next: the bigger use of cash is spending on new assets, at 8.6× depreciation over three years. The next section checks what that spending is building.

TransIndia Real Estate Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 14 days in FY26, down from 54 days in FY23. It spent ₹428 Cr on assets over the last 3 years.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹84.0 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹0.2 Cr, so roughly ₹3.0 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

Spending on assets: ₹428 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹50.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹0.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

TransIndia Real Estate Ltd's P/E is 15.8×, about the lowest it has ever been. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 25.7×, over 3.2 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

The P/E here, and its history, use a profit figure that can leave out one-off items, so it can differ from a P/E worked out on the quarterly results. Those results' earnings per share for the four quarters to Jun 2026 add up to ₹1.67.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved −29.9% while the price moved −15.3%. The price did better than earnings, which pushed the multiple up within its own range.

Where the price move came from: over 3 years the price moved −16.5% a year; about +3.2% a year came from earnings growth and about −19.7 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source has, is not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 47% on reported income across 15 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

TransIndia Real Estate Ltd's business is turning around. Profit growth has swung from −77.6% at its low to −26.8%, improving for 4 quarters in a row, with ROCE steady at 3.0%. This is based on 8 quarters of 3 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: a turn in growth is often where a bigger change starts. The lines say a turn is forming, so the question is whether the next quarters confirm it.

The return figures here are yearly, not quarterly. They show level and direction only; they can support the growth lines but never decide the reading alone.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

TransIndia Real Estate Ltd earned a ROCE of 3% in FY26. That is up from a low of 2% in FY25. We cannot compare its return on capital used with its cost of capital from the data we have. It comes from a 44.0% net margin and 0.06× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 44.0% net margin × 0.06× asset turnover × 1.07× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 2.8% on equity. The margin does most of the work; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed.

The quarterly return lines and the return-on-capital-used (ROIC) line, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 47% on reported income across 15 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

TransIndia Real Estate Ltd had ₹0.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹1,279 Cr of equity in FY26, so its debt is 0.00× its equity. Its operating profit is 23 times its interest bill. Over 4 years borrowings went from ₹0.0 Cr to ₹0.0 Cr. Over the last 3 of those years it spent ₹428 Cr on assets.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Interest cover shows how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low debt and high cover are the safe combination.

The spending on assets is being paid for from cash, not new debt.

The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 47% on reported income across 15 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Promoters raised their stake in TransIndia Real Estate Ltd by 2.7 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Promoters now own 71.8% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −1.2 points over the same period, to 5.9%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Promoters: +2.7 points over 8 quarters, to 71.8%; Foreign institutions: −1.2 points over 8 quarters, to 5.9%; Domestic institutions: +0.1 points over 8 quarters, to 1.3%.

Why the owners changed: promoters drove it (+2.7 points), with the other side taken by foreign institutions (−1.2 points). They raised their stake step by step.

For TransIndia Real Estate Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

44.5 out of 100, rank 8 of 18 in Logistics, with 78% of the evidence available.

TransIndia Real Estate Ltd scores 44.5 out of 100 against the 18 companies it is compared with in Logistics, ranking 8. The valuation scores well, but earnings are not improving yet, so the business does not back up the low multiple so far.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 12.1 + 9.3 + 13.7 + 9.4 = 44.5. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

TransIndia Real Estate ranks 8 of 18 Logistics companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 44.5 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Logistics, all 18 compared on one page.

TransIndia Real Estate is the 17th largest of 18 Logistics companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Tejas Cargo India, Ritco Logistics, Allcargo Terminals, JITF Infra Logistics and Sical Logistics. Just below it: S J Logistics (India).

Logistics companies close in size

12. Tejas Cargo India Ltd ₹946 crore
13. Ritco Logistics Ltd ₹759 crore
14. Allcargo Terminals Ltd ₹695 crore
15. JITF Infra Logistics Ltd ₹678 crore
16. Sical Logistics Ltd ₹609 crore
17. TransIndia Real Estate Ltd ₹583 crore
18. S J Logistics (India) Ltd ₹493 crore

All 18 Logistics companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

1922. Sreeleathers Ltd ₹586 crore · Footwear
1923. T.V. Today Network Ltd ₹583 crore · Entertainment & Media
1924. TransIndia Real Estate Ltd ₹583 crore
1925. Jagatjit Industries Ltd ₹582 crore · Alcoholic Beverages
1926. Satani Bearings Ltd ₹582 crore · Trading

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.