Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd
BAFNAPHBafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
Biggest watch item: the price is already 13 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (13 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read mixed, and 455% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd trades at ₹285, in a confirmed uptrend and 13 weeks into that stage. That is +79.8% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 100% of a 52-week range of ₹132 to ₹285. On relative strength it has no relative-strength read yet.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 13 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹285 it trades +79.8% versus its 200-day average and sits at 100% of its 52-week range (₹132–₹285).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 2 months the stock moved +116% while the NIFTY 500 moved +5% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: no trailing-13-week read yet — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
P/E does not price Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd — earnings are negative, so there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where a turn, when it comes, would show first. On sales the market values Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd at 16.0× its FY20 revenue of ₹42.0 Cr.
With earnings negative, P/E does not price — there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where the turn, when it comes, will show first.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 4 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −4.5% | −13.5% | −15.4% | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
48.5/100 — rank 43 of 44 in Pharma - Formulators · 20% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd scores 48.5 out of 100 against the 44 companies it is compared with in Pharma - Formulators, ranking 43. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 19 + 7.1 + 10 + 12.4 = 48.5. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd reported ₹11.6 Cr of revenue in the Sep 19 quarter, +30.9% year on year. Over 8 years it has compounded at −13.1% a year. The last full year, FY20, came in at ₹42.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹39.2 Cr.
FY20 revenue came in at ₹42.0 Cr (−4.5% on the year), capping 8 years at −13.1% compound. The latest quarter (Sep 19) printed ₹11.6 Cr, +30.9% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −5.9% growth against the decade's −13.1% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's operating margin is −3.3% in the Sep 19 quarter, −5.3 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 9 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −77.0% to 15.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is −3.3%, −5.3 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 9 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −77.0%–15.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +195.5 pp year on year while gross margin went +35.2 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd posted a net loss of ₹0.6 Cr in the Sep 19 quarter. The full FY20 year was a loss of ₹24.0 Cr. That loss is 5.1% of the quarter's revenue.
Sep 19 profit was ₹−0.6 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY20 printed ₹−24.0 Cr (null).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 455% of Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY20 that was ₹−34.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹−24.0 Cr of profit. After ₹1.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−35.0 Cr was left as free cash.
FY20: operating cash of ₹−34.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−24.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−35.0 Cr after ₹1.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 455% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 455%: the cash cycle tightened 187 days between FY15 and FY20 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 31 days in FY20, down from 218 days in FY15. Capital spending ran ₹−4.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY20 sales of ₹42.0 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.1 Cr, so roughly ₹4.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY20: debtors at 52 days, inventory at 208 days — roughly 6.8 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 31 days, tighter than FY15's 218.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 208 days to sell; customers pay about 52 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 229 days — netting out to the 31-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY20 sales of ₹42.0 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.1 Cr — so the 31-day loop keeps roughly ₹4.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹−4.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹10.0 Cr of depreciation — spending at or below maintenance level. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY20) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd earns a ROCE of −3% in FY20. That is up from a trough of −36% in FY18. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is −57.1% net margin on 0.59× asset turns.
FY20 ROCE is −3%, recovered from a FY18 trough of −36% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY20): −57.1% net margin × 0.59× asset turns × 1.39× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −46.8% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd carries ₹3.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹51.0 Cr of equity in FY20, a debt-to-equity of 0.06. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹69.0 Cr to ₹3.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹−4.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY20: borrowings of ₹3.0 Cr against equity of ₹51.0 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.06. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹69.0 Cr to ₹3.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹−4.0 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Promoters cut 13.3 points of Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 75.0% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +9.3 points over the same window, to 9.3%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Promoters: −13.3 points over 8 quarters to 75.0%; Foreign institutions: +9.3 points over 8 quarters to 9.3%.
🚨 Why the register moved: promoters drove it (−13.3 points), absorbed on the other side by foreign institutions (+9.3 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Kwality Pharmaceuticals Ltd539997 | 72.5/100Favorable setup78% evidence | LEADER | 29.3/35 Revenue 35.7% · PAT 71.8% · OPM change 3 pp 83% evidence | 17.9/25 ROCE 24.2% · OPM 25% 76% evidence | 6.4/20 P/E 39.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 18.9/20 RS sector 46.7% · RS bench 69.8% · 1Y 132%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.3 + 17.9 + 6.4 + 18.9 = 72.5 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Emcure Pharmaceuticals LtdEMCURE | 70.6/100Favorable setup75% evidence | LEADER | 26.7/35 Revenue 18.4% · PAT 32.2% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 18.3/25 ROCE 24% · OPM 21% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 36.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.8/20 RS sector 4.8% · RS bench 24.6% · 1Y 45%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.7 + 18.3 + 9.8 + 15.8 = 70.6 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 3Lupin LtdLUPIN | 70.5/100Favorable setup93% evidence | ASLEEP | 29.5/35 Revenue 28.2% · PAT 49.2% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 18.4/25 ROCE 29.9% · OPM 30% 100% evidence | 16.3/20 P/E 18.2× · PEG 0.54 65% evidence | 6.3/20 RS sector -11.9% · RS bench 5.2% · 1Y 26.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.5 + 18.4 + 16.3 + 6.3 = 70.5 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -11.9% and the one-year return is 26.6%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 4Caplin Point Laboratories LtdCAPLIPOINT | 68.6/100Favorable setup96% evidence | LEADER | 19.3/35 Revenue 12.9% · PAT 20.1% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence | 19.3/25 ROCE 24.6% · OPM 34% 100% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 30.5× · PEG 0.99 100% evidence | 17.7/20 RS sector 5.1% · RS bench 25.2% · 1Y 29.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.3 + 19.3 + 12.3 + 17.7 = 68.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Glenmark Pharmaceuticals LtdGLENMARK | 66.9/100Favorable setup100% evidence | ASLEEP | 30.7/35 Revenue 32.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 17.7/25 ROCE 39.8% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 12.2/20 P/E 20.6× · PEG 1.43 100% evidence | 6.3/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench 6.4% · 1Y 10.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 30.7 + 17.7 + 12.2 + 6.3 = 66.9 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -11% and the one-year return is 10.2%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 6Bliss GVS Pharma LtdBLISSGVS | 66.8/100Favorable setup78% evidence | LEADER | 27.2/35 Revenue 14.3% · PAT 48.4% · OPM change 6 pp 83% evidence | 13.3/25 ROCE 16.9% · OPM 17% 76% evidence | 6.5/20 P/E 38.5× · PEG — 50% evidence | 19.8/20 RS sector 61.4% · RS bench 85.8% · 1Y 174.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.2 + 13.3 + 6.5 + 19.8 = 66.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Corona Remedies LtdCORONA | 65.1/100Favorable setup73% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.7/35 Revenue 18% · PAT 19.3% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 19.8/25 ROCE 33.3% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 11.6/20 P/E 59.3× · PEG 1.18 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —9 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.7 + 19.8 + 11.6 + 10 = 65.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Rubicon Research LtdRUBICON | 61.0/100Mixed-positive evidence69% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.3/35 Revenue 36.6% · PAT 84.3% · OPM change 3 pp 88% evidence | 21.7/25 ROCE 28.4% · OPM 23% 100% evidence | 5.0/20 P/E 104× · PEG 2.76 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —12 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.3 + 21.7 + 5 + 10 = 61 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 9Zydus Lifesciences LtdZYDUSLIFE | 60.8/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence | LEADER | 16.9/35 Revenue 16.8% · PAT 9.7% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence | 18.1/25 ROCE 21.1% · OPM 34% 100% evidence | 14.1/20 P/E 20.5× · PEG 1.4 100% evidence | 11.7/20 RS sector -7% · RS bench 11% · 1Y 17.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.9 + 18.1 + 14.1 + 11.7 = 60.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Marksans Pharma LtdMARKSANS | 59.1/100Mixed-positive evidence83% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.8/35 Revenue 12.5% · PAT 9.7% · OPM change 5 pp 88% evidence | 18.6/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 23% 100% evidence | 11.6/20 P/E 29.8× · PEG 1.41 65% evidence | 9.1/20 RS sector -18.1% · RS bench 36.3% · 1Y 21.8%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 18.6 + 11.6 + 9.1 = 59.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Ajanta Pharma LtdAJANTPHARM | 59.0/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.6/35 Revenue 20.2% · PAT 22.2% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 19.0/25 ROCE 34.5% · OPM 26% 100% evidence | 5.5/20 P/E 38.4× · PEG 2.31 100% evidence | 12.9/20 RS sector 0.7% · RS bench 20% · 1Y 29.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.6 + 19 + 5.5 + 12.9 = 59 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 12Wockhardt LtdWOCKPHARMA | 58.3/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | LEADER | 22.4/35 Revenue 12% · PAT 100% · OPM change 14 pp 65% evidence | 9.4/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 23% 100% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 116× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.8/20 RS sector 10.5% · RS bench 31.1% · 1Y 25.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.4 + 9.4 + 8.7 + 17.8 = 58.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Accent Microcell LtdACCENTMIC | 58.1/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | LEADER | 17.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 26% evidence | 17.2/25 ROCE 24.9% · OPM 16% 95% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 29.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 14.0/20 RS sector 22.4% · RS bench 44.3% · 1Y 74.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.4 + 17.2 + 9.5 + 14 = 58.1 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 44.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 14Ipca Laboratories LtdIPCALAB | 58.0/100Mixed-positive evidence78% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 22.1/35 Revenue 7.9% · PAT 51% · OPM change 1 pp 83% evidence | 15.3/25 ROCE 17% · OPM 20% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 37.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 9.8/20 RS sector -5.4% · RS bench 12.7% · 1Y 19.7%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 15.3 + 10.8 + 9.8 = 58 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Amrutanjan Health Care LtdAMRUTANJAN | 56.4/100Mixed-positive evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.9/35 Revenue 11.3% · PAT 11.8% · OPM change 4 pp 83% evidence | 17.3/25 ROCE 24.8% · OPM 17% 95% evidence | 14.3/20 P/E 23.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 3.9/20 RS sector -24.6% · RS bench -17.9% · 1Y -23.3%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.9 + 17.3 + 14.3 + 3.9 = 56.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Kilitch Drugs (India) LtdKILITCH | 54.3/100Mixed-positive evidence83% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.1/35 Revenue 19.8% · PAT 16% · OPM change 1 pp 83% evidence | 10.2/25 ROCE 13.4% · OPM 25% 95% evidence | 13.8/20 P/E 26.5× · PEG — 50% evidence | 12.2/20 RS sector -8.8% · RS bench 9.4% · 1Y -13%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 10.2 + 13.8 + 12.2 = 54.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals LtdAKUMS | 52.6/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | LEADER | 13.5/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT -15.8% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE 14.9% · OPM 15% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 36× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.3/20 RS sector 14.1% · RS bench 35.2% · 1Y 35.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.5 + 10.9 + 9.9 + 18.3 = 52.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 35.2%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 18Alkem Laboratories LtdALKEM | 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence78% evidence | FADING | 19.7/35 Revenue 13.5% · PAT 6.1% · OPM change 2 pp 83% evidence | 16.2/25 ROCE 21.2% · OPM 14% 76% evidence | 12.1/20 P/E 27.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.3/20 RS sector -17.3% · RS bench -0.7% · 1Y 14.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 16.2 + 12.1 + 4.3 = 52.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19ERIS Lifesciences LtdERIS | 51.9/100Mixed-positive evidence76% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.8/35 Revenue 9.6% · PAT 62.2% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence | 14.4/25 ROCE 14.1% · OPM 34% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 29.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.4/20 RS sector -13.9% · RS bench -9% · 1Y -23.6%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.8 + 14.4 + 11.3 + 5.4 = 51.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20RPG Life Sciences LtdRPGLIFE | 49.5/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence | FADING | 11.6/35 Revenue 11.9% · PAT -34.1% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 17.4/25 ROCE 25.7% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 37.7× · PEG 1.43 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector -4.1% · RS bench 14.7% · 1Y 13.2%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.6 + 17.4 + 10.5 + 10 = 49.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21J B Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals LtdJBCHEPHARM | 46.8/100Mixed-negative evidence96% evidence | 10.5/35 Revenue 5.9% · PAT 7.4% · OPM change -2 pp 88% evidence | 20.4/25 ROCE 25.4% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 3.7/20 P/E 53.8× · PEG 2.34 100% evidence | 12.2/20 RS sector 1.8% · RS bench 23.5% · 1Y 38.6%5 of 9 weeks ahead 100% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 10.5 + 20.4 + 3.7 + 12.2 = 46.8 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 22Aurobindo Pharma LtdAUROPHARMA | 46.0/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 16.2/35 Revenue 9.1% · PAT 9.5% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 12.9% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 4.4/20 P/E 25.5× · PEG 2.67 100% evidence | 13.6/20 RS sector 6% · RS bench 25.9% · 1Y 53.5%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.2 + 11.8 + 4.4 + 13.6 = 46 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 25.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 23Fredun Pharmaceuticals Ltd539730 | 45.9/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0 pp 24% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 21.3% · OPM 14% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 47× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -33.3% · RS bench 93.6% · 1Y 23.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 14.9 + 9.3 + 5 = 45.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Sun Pharmaceutical Industries LtdSUNPHARMA | 45.6/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 17.4/35 Revenue 11.4% · PAT 16.5% · OPM change -2 pp 100% evidence | 16.6/25 ROCE 20.5% · OPM 29% 100% evidence | 4.0/20 P/E 36.9× · PEG 3.8 100% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -9.5% · RS bench 8.3% · 1Y 19.3%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.4 + 16.6 + 4 + 7.6 = 45.6 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 25Strides Pharma Science LtdSTAR | 44.4/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence | FADING | 15.8/35 Revenue 8.1% · PAT 79.1% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 12.4/25 ROCE 18.3% · OPM 18% 95% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 16× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.9/20 RS sector -13.6% · RS bench 2.9% · 1Y 20%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.8 + 12.4 + 11.3 + 4.9 = 44.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26Gufic BioSciences LtdGUFICBIO | 42.6/100Mixed-negative evidence90% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.5/35 Revenue 15.1% · PAT -8.6% · OPM change 6 pp 88% evidence | 12.9/25 ROCE 12.3% · OPM 19% 100% evidence | 2.0/20 P/E 65.8× · PEG 4.78 100% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector -18.5% · RS bench 22.5% · 1Y 9.6%10 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.5 + 12.9 + 2 + 8.2 = 42.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 27Alembic Pharmaceuticals LtdAPLLTD | 42.1/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | FADING | 16.7/35 Revenue 14.1% · PAT 14.6% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 7.8/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 12.4/20 P/E 21.9× · PEG 1.74 100% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -24.1% · RS bench -1.5% · 1Y -13.4%1 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 7.8 + 12.4 + 5.2 = 42.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28Torrent Pharmaceuticals LtdTORNTPHARM | 41.6/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.7/35 Revenue 32.9% · PAT 7.7% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 13.6/25 ROCE 15.2% · OPM 34% 100% evidence | 0.9/20 P/E 83.9× · PEG 5.11 100% evidence | 10.4/20 RS sector -0.9% · RS bench 18.1% · 1Y 34.8%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 13.6 + 0.9 + 10.4 = 41.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 29Mankind Pharma LtdMANKIND | 41.0/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.1/35 Revenue 14.2% · PAT 8% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 13.5% · OPM 26% 100% evidence | 4.9/20 P/E 47.6× · PEG 2.81 100% evidence | 5.9/20 RS sector -13.7% · RS bench 3.4% · 1Y -4.3%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 13.1 + 4.9 + 5.9 = 41 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 30Lincoln Pharmaceuticals LtdLINCOLN | 40.4/100Mixed-negative evidence83% evidence | ASLEEP | 10.9/35 Revenue 7.5% · PAT 7.2% · OPM change -3 pp 83% evidence | 14.4/25 ROCE 16.3% · OPM 13% 95% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 13.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -13.6% · RS bench 3.1% · 1Y 12.4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.9 + 14.4 + 9.8 + 5.3 = 40.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 31Suven Life Sciences LtdSUVEN | 40.0/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.9/35 Revenue 25% · PAT -80% · OPM change -997 pp 74% evidence | 2.1/25 ROCE -79.5% · OPM — 84% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 8.0/20 RS sector -30.9% · RS bench 49.5% · 1Y 19.3%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.9 + 2.1 + 10 + 8 = 40 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 32Biocon LtdBIOCON | 39.9/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.3/35 Revenue 9.8% · PAT -36.4% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 7.4/25 ROCE 3.6% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 95.5× · PEG 0.82 100% evidence | 9.0/20 RS sector -9.9% · RS bench 7.7% · 1Y 11.3%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.3 + 7.4 + 10.2 + 9 = 39.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 33Natco Pharma LtdNATCOPHARM | 39.4/100Mixed-negative evidence96% evidence | ASLEEP | 4.9/35 Revenue -8% · PAT -24.6% · OPM change -28 pp 88% evidence | 13.2/25 ROCE 17.1% · OPM 17% 100% evidence | 19.1/20 P/E 11.6× · PEG 0.76 100% evidence | 2.2/20 RS sector -19.4% · RS bench -3.6% · 1Y -1.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.9 + 13.2 + 19.1 + 2.2 = 39.4 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 34FDC LtdFDC | 39.1/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.1/35 Revenue 3% · PAT 4.9% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 16.7% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 19.6× · PEG 1.98 100% evidence | 3.8/20 RS sector -25.2% · RS bench -10.6% · 1Y -22.2%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.1 + 13.1 + 11.1 + 3.8 = 39.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 35Zim Laboratories LtdZIMLAB | 38.9/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence | FADING | 9.5/35 Revenue 7.5% · PAT -60.6% · OPM change -3.3 pp 71% evidence | 6.0/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 2.6% 95% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 162× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.8/20 RS sector 11.2% · RS bench 31.1% · 1Y 3.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.5 + 6 + 8.6 + 14.8 = 38.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 31.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 36Indoco Remedies LtdINDOCO | 38.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.4/35 Revenue 11.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5 pp 71% evidence | 4.5/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.6/20 RS sector -32.2% · RS bench -8.7% · 1Y -28.3%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.4 + 4.5 + 10 + 3.6 = 38.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 37Cipla LtdCIPLA | 35.5/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 4.5/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT -37.7% · OPM change -9 pp 100% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 15.5% · OPM 17% 100% evidence | 12.2/20 P/E 33× · PEG 1.25 100% evidence | 7.3/20 RS sector -17.1% · RS bench -0.3% · 1Y -2.6%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.5 + 11.5 + 12.2 + 7.3 = 35.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 38Bajaj Healthcare LtdBAJAJHCARE | 35.2/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.6/35 Revenue 12.3% · PAT -59.1% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 10.6/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 17% 95% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 19.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.2/20 RS sector -29.4% · RS bench -14.3% · 1Y -29.7%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.6 + 10.6 + 10.8 + 4.2 = 35.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 39Bharat Parenterals Ltd541096 | 33.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 12.3/35 Revenue -11.2% · PAT 16% · OPM change -2.8 pp 71% evidence | 4.2/25 ROCE -1.8% · OPM 9.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 7.3/20 RS sector -20.9% · RS bench 9.2% · 1Y -9.5%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.3 + 4.2 + 10 + 7.3 = 33.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 40Dr Reddys Laboratories LtdDRREDDY | 30.3/100Adverse evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 3.7/35 Revenue -0.9% · PAT -44.6% · OPM change -14 pp 100% evidence | 11.2/25 ROCE 13% · OPM 11% 100% evidence | 13.7/20 P/E 30.4× · PEG 1.15 100% evidence | 1.7/20 RS sector -24.7% · RS bench -9.6% · 1Y -4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 3.7 + 11.2 + 13.7 + 1.7 = 30.3 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 41Influx Healthtech LtdINFLUX | 63.5/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | FADING | 19.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 26% evidence | 20.6/25 ROCE 40% · OPM 19% 95% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 32× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.8/20 RS sector 3.4% · RS bench 22.7% · 1Y 82.7%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 20.6 + 10.1 + 13.8 = 63.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 42Syncom Healthcare LtdSYNCOM | 50.3/100Thin evidence · provisional31% evidence | 17.1/35 Revenue -69.4% · PAT 63.5% · OPM change — 16% evidence | 6.9/25 ROCE -20.2% · OPM -225.7% 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 16.3/20 RS sector 29.1% · RS bench 45.7% · 1Y —9 of 12 weeks ahead to 2021-06-30 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 6.9 + 10 + 16.3 = 50.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 43Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltdthis pageBAFNAPH | 48.5/100Thin evidence · provisional20% evidence | 19.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence | 7.1/25 ROCE -3% · OPM -3.3% 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 12.4/20 RS sector — · RS bench 86.6% · 1Y — 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 19 + 7.1 + 10 + 12.4 = 48.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 44Sai Parenterals LtdSAIPARENT | 39.4/100Thin evidence · provisional33% evidence | TURNING | 15.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 16% evidence | 5.7/25 ROCE 6% · OPM 13% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 176× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —4 of 4 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.2 + 5.7 + 8.5 + 10 = 39.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's share price today?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd trades at ₹285. The company is valued at ₹674 Cr. The stock sits at 100% of its 52-week range of ₹132–₹285, +79.8% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 13 weeks in. — as of 7 August 2026.
What were Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd reported revenue of ₹11.6 Cr and a net loss of ₹0.6 Cr for the Sep 19 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹−2.49. The operating margin was −3.3%, 5.3 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 7 August 2026.
What is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's revenue?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd reported revenue of ₹11.6 Cr in the Sep 19 quarter, +30.9% year on year. For the full FY20 fiscal year, revenue was ₹42.0 Cr (−4.5%). Over the last 8 years revenue compounded at −13.1% a year. — as of 7 August 2026.
What is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's profit?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd earned ₹−0.6 Cr of net profit in the Sep 19 quarter. Full-year FY20 profit was ₹−24.0 Cr. The operating margin ran −3.3% in the latest quarter. — as of 7 August 2026.
What is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's market cap?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹674 Cr at a share price of ₹285. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 7 August 2026.
Does Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd pay a dividend?
Not in its latest year — Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's dividend payout was 0% of profit in FY20. It did record a payout in 1 of its last 9 reported fiscal years, so there is a history but no current dividend. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 7 August 2026.
How is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd performing?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 13 weeks in. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 7 August 2026.
Is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 13 of stage 2), trading +79.8% versus its 200-day average and at 100% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 7 August 2026.
Will Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹285, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 13 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 7 August 2026.
Who owns Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd?
Promoters hold 75.0% of Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd, foreign institutions 9.3%, domestic institutions null% and the public 15.7% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Promoters cut 13.3 points over 8 quarters. — as of 7 August 2026.
Does Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd have too much debt?
No — Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.06, and operating profit covers the interest bill −7×. FY20 borrowings were ₹3.0 Cr against equity of ₹51.0 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 7 August 2026.
What is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's capex?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd spent ₹−4.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY20 alone that was ₹1.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 7 August 2026.
What is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's cash flow?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd generated ₹−34.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY20 and ₹−35.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹1.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹−24.0 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 7 August 2026.
Is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 455% of Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY20, operating cash was ₹−34.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−24.0 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 7 August 2026.
Where is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd in its business cycle?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's FY20 operating margin was 2.9%, against a 9-year band of −77.0%–15.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran −3.3%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 7 August 2026.
What could break the Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd story?
Biggest watch item: the price is already 13 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 7 August 2026.
Is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 7 August 2026.