Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd
BAFNAPHBafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: Foreign institutions moved +9.3 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (19 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 95th percentile of its own 9-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating — profit −97.6% year on year, and 209% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd trades at ₹317, in a confirmed uptrend and 19 weeks into that stage. That is +66.6% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 100% of a 52-week range of ₹132 to ₹317. On relative strength it has no relative-strength read yet.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 19 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹317 it trades +66.6% versus its 200-day average and sits at 100% of its 52-week range (₹132–₹317).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 4 months the stock moved +140% while the NIFTY 500 moved +1% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: no trailing-13-week read yet — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd trades at 96.3× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (95th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 36.7×, measured across 8.6 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 96.3× is at the pricey end of its own range (95th percentile), against a long-run median of 36.7× measured over 8.6 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — no clean majority across the growth curves, ROCE holding at 12.0% — the per-curve reads carry the story. The read is built from 10 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +3.4% | +9.5% | +16.3% | +5.9% |
| Profit | +175.0% | +0.0% | +12.9% | — |
| EPS | +168.0% | −0.7% | +13.8% | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
39.8/100 — rank 34 of 44 in Pharma - Formulators · 60% evidence confidence
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd scores 39.8 out of 100 against the 44 companies it is compared with in Pharma - Formulators, ranking 34. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 11.5 + 7.3 + 8.7 + 12.3 = 39.8. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd reported ₹26.6 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, −23.2% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 5.9% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹151 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹143 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹151 Cr (+3.4% on the year), capping 10 years at 5.9% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹26.6 Cr, −23.2% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −2.9% growth against the decade's 5.9% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −3.1% over the last 4 quarters against −0.4%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit −5.8% vs +427.5%/yr — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's operating margin is 3.4% in the Jun 26 quarter, −11.3 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 15 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −77.0% to 15.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 3.4%, −11.3 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 15 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −77.0%–15.0%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −11.3 pp year on year while gross margin went +2.6 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd earned ₹0.1 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −97.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹11.0 Cr. That is 0.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹3.4 Cr. 2 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Jun 26 profit was ₹0.1 Cr, −97.6% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹11.0 Cr (+175.0%).
🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed −23.2% and the margin −11.3 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +31.3% vs revenue −2.9%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 209% of Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹15.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹11.0 Cr of profit. After ₹25.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−10.0 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹15.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹11.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−10.0 Cr after ₹25.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 209% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 209%: the cash cycle held roughly steady between FY21 and FY26 — so conversion tracks profitability rather than the cycle.
Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 3.7× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 96 days in FY26, down from 96 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹59.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹151 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.4 Cr, so roughly ₹40.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 106 days, inventory at 129 days — roughly 4.2 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 96 days, tighter than FY21's 96.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 129 days to sell; customers pay about 106 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 139 days — netting out to the 96-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹151 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.4 Cr — so the 96-day loop keeps roughly ₹40.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹59.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹16.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹3.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd earns a ROCE of 12% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −35% in FY18. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 7.3% net margin on 0.86× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 12%, recovered from a FY18 trough of −35% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 7.3% net margin × 0.86× asset turns × 1.83× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 11.5% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd carries ₹37.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹96.0 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.39. Operating profit covers the interest bill 4×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹15.0 Cr to ₹37.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹59.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY26: borrowings of ₹37.0 Cr against equity of ₹96.0 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.39. Operating profit covers the interest bill 4×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹15.0 Cr to ₹37.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹59.0 Cr in just the last 3 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Promoters cut 13.3 points of Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 75.0% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +9.3 points over the same window, to 9.3%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Promoters: −13.3 points over 8 quarters to 75.0%; Foreign institutions: +9.3 points over 8 quarters to 9.3%.
🚨 Why the register moved: promoters drove it (−13.3 points), absorbed on the other side by foreign institutions (+9.3 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Kwality Pharmaceuticals Ltd539997 | 72.3/100Favorable setup82% evidence | LEADER | 31.1/35 Revenue 37.9% · PAT 88.4% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence | 17.8/25 ROCE 24.1% · OPM 25% 76% evidence | 6.3/20 P/E 44.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 17.1/20 RS sector 62.1% · RS bench 98.1% · 1Y 251.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 31.1 + 17.8 + 6.3 + 17.1 = 72.3 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Glenmark Pharmaceuticals LtdGLENMARK | 71.7/100Favorable setup100% evidence | TURNING | 30.8/35 Revenue 32.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 18.2/25 ROCE 39.8% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 12.6/20 P/E 22.1× · PEG 1.43 100% evidence | 10.1/20 RS sector -9.5% · RS bench 16.3% · 1Y 14.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 30.8 + 18.2 + 12.6 + 10.1 = 71.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Ipca Laboratories LtdIPCALAB | 68.7/100Favorable setup82% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 26.3/35 Revenue 10.6% · PAT 68% · OPM change 6 pp 95% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 17% · OPM 24% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 37.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 15.8/20 RS sector 1.8% · RS bench 30.2% · 1Y 52.8%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.3 + 15.8 + 10.8 + 15.8 = 68.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Emcure Pharmaceuticals LtdEMCURE | 66.5/100Favorable setup75% evidence | LEADER | 27.3/35 Revenue 18.4% · PAT 32.2% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 18.2/25 ROCE 24% · OPM 21% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 36.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.0/20 RS sector -1.1% · RS bench 26.2% · 1Y 48.6%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.3 + 18.2 + 10 + 11 = 66.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Lupin LtdLUPIN | 66.4/100Favorable setup93% evidence | ASLEEP | 29.6/35 Revenue 28.2% · PAT 49.2% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 19.3/25 ROCE 29.9% · OPM 30% 100% evidence | 16.3/20 P/E 16× · PEG 0.54 65% evidence | 1.2/20 RS sector -26% · RS bench -4.5% · 1Y 1.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.6 + 19.3 + 16.3 + 1.2 = 66.4 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -26% and the one-year return is 1.9%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 6Corona Remedies LtdCORONA | 65.2/100Favorable setup73% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.0/35 Revenue 18% · PAT 19.3% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 20.4/25 ROCE 33.3% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 11.8/20 P/E 63.5× · PEG 1.18 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —12 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23 + 20.4 + 11.8 + 10 = 65.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Fredun Pharmaceuticals LtdFREDUN | 65.0/100Favorable setup74% evidence | 26.7/35 Revenue 91.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 13.0/25 ROCE 21.3% · OPM 14% 95% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 49.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.0/20 RS sector 24.1% · RS bench 77.2% · 1Y 7.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 26.7 + 13 + 9.3 + 16 = 65 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Accent Microcell LtdACCENTMIC | 64.7/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | LEADER | 17.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 26% evidence | 18.9/25 ROCE 24.9% · OPM 16% 95% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 37.3× · PEG — 50% evidence | 19.4/20 RS sector 34.8% · RS bench 69.1% · 1Y 157.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.5 + 18.9 + 8.9 + 19.4 = 64.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Bliss GVS Pharma LtdBLISSGVS | 64.2/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | LEADER | 29.0/35 Revenue 20.6% · PAT 25.7% · OPM change 7 pp 95% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 16.9% · OPM 27% 76% evidence | 6.1/20 P/E 52.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 14.3/20 RS sector 87.2% · RS bench 126.7% · 1Y 347.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29 + 14.8 + 6.1 + 14.3 = 64.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Caplin Point Laboratories LtdCAPLIPOINT | 60.5/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 19.0/35 Revenue 15% · PAT 19.6% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 17.7/25 ROCE 24.2% · OPM 35% 100% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 31.4× · PEG 1.52 100% evidence | 14.3/20 RS sector 6.2% · RS bench 35.3% · 1Y 22.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 17.7 + 9.5 + 14.3 = 60.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Ajanta Pharma LtdAJANTPHARM | 58.1/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 21.3/35 Revenue 20.2% · PAT 22.2% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 19.6/25 ROCE 34.5% · OPM 26% 100% evidence | 5.5/20 P/E 39.2× · PEG 2.31 100% evidence | 11.7/20 RS sector -4.2% · RS bench 22.5% · 1Y 38.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.3 + 19.6 + 5.5 + 11.7 = 58.1 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 12Influx Healthtech LtdINFLUX | 58.1/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 26% evidence | 20.8/25 ROCE 40% · OPM 19% 95% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 30.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.7/20 RS sector -8.6% · RS bench 16.5% · 1Y 45.5%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.3 + 20.8 + 10.3 + 7.7 = 58.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Rubicon Research LtdRUBICON | 57.9/100Mixed-positive evidence73% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.1/35 Revenue 46.8% · PAT 91.4% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 17.9/25 ROCE 28.4% · OPM 24% 100% evidence | 5.9/20 P/E 101× · PEG 2.53 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —12 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.1 + 17.9 + 5.9 + 10 = 57.9 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 14Marksans Pharma LtdMARKSANS | 57.5/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 25.8/35 Revenue 19.6% · PAT 48% · OPM change 9 pp 100% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 6.4/20 P/E 28.1× · PEG 2.85 65% evidence | 9.5/20 RS sector -18.1% · RS bench 52% · 1Y 85.1%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.8 + 15.8 + 6.4 + 9.5 = 57.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Strides Pharma Science LtdSTAR | 56.7/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | TURNING | 20.6/35 Revenue 8.1% · PAT 79.1% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 13.3/25 ROCE 18.3% · OPM 18% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 19.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.6/20 RS sector -0.9% · RS bench 27% · 1Y 34.1%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.6 + 13.3 + 11.2 + 11.6 = 56.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16RPG Life Sciences LtdRPGLIFE | 53.5/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence | LEADER | 11.9/35 Revenue 11.9% · PAT -34.1% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 17.5/25 ROCE 25.7% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 39.7× · PEG 1.43 65% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector -3.9% · RS bench 23.4% · 1Y 17.7%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.9 + 17.5 + 11 + 13.1 = 53.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 23.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 17ERIS Lifesciences LtdERIS | 52.6/100Mixed-positive evidence76% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.4/35 Revenue 9.6% · PAT 62.2% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 14.1% · OPM 34% 76% evidence | 12.2/20 P/E 27.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.7/20 RS sector -13.8% · RS bench -6.9% · 1Y -21.2%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.4 + 14.3 + 12.2 + 5.7 = 52.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals LtdAKUMS | 51.9/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | LEADER | 13.2/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT -15.8% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE 14.9% · OPM 15% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 40.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.2/20 RS sector 17% · RS bench 47.9% · 1Y 69.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.2 + 10.9 + 9.6 + 18.2 = 51.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 47.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 19Wockhardt LtdWOCKPHARMA | 51.9/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | FADING | 24.9/35 Revenue 18.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 11 pp 74% evidence | 5.3/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 85× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.8/20 RS sector 6.4% · RS bench 35.1% · 1Y 37.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.9 + 5.3 + 8.9 + 12.8 = 51.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Zydus Lifesciences LtdZYDUSLIFE | 51.7/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 11.9/35 Revenue 21.1% · PAT -2.5% · OPM change -8 pp 100% evidence | 16.7/25 ROCE 21.1% · OPM 24% 100% evidence | 13.7/20 P/E 23.8× · PEG 1.23 100% evidence | 9.4/20 RS sector -7.8% · RS bench 18.3% · 1Y 11%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.9 + 16.7 + 13.7 + 9.4 = 51.7 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 21Suven Life Sciences LtdSUVEN | 50.7/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence | LEADER | 19.8/35 Revenue 25% · PAT -80% · OPM change -997 pp 74% evidence | 2.2/25 ROCE -79.5% · OPM — 84% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 18.7/20 RS sector 24.3% · RS bench 55.1% · 1Y 52.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 2.2 + 10 + 18.7 = 50.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 22J B Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals LtdJBCHEPHARM | 48.5/100Mixed-negative evidence96% evidence | 10.6/35 Revenue 5.9% · PAT 7.4% · OPM change -2 pp 88% evidence | 20.6/25 ROCE 25.4% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 3.8/20 P/E 53.8× · PEG 2.34 100% evidence | 13.5/20 RS sector -0.3% · RS bench 23.5% · 1Y 41.7%3 of 3 weeks ahead to 2026-07-19 100% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 10.6 + 20.6 + 3.8 + 13.5 = 48.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 23.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 23Alkem Laboratories LtdALKEM | 47.8/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | TURNING | 14.6/35 Revenue 13.4% · PAT -5.5% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence | 17.4/25 ROCE 21.2% · OPM 20% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 28.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.8/20 RS sector -22.5% · RS bench 0.6% · 1Y 0.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.6 + 17.4 + 11 + 4.8 = 47.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Aurobindo Pharma LtdAUROPHARMA | 47.3/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 16.5/35 Revenue 9.1% · PAT 9.5% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 12.9% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 4.8/20 P/E 26.4× · PEG 2.67 100% evidence | 13.7/20 RS sector 2% · RS bench 29.9% · 1Y 58.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.5 + 12.3 + 4.8 + 13.7 = 47.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 29.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 25Lincoln Pharmaceuticals LtdLINCOLN | 46.9/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.1/35 Revenue 10% · PAT 11.5% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 15.3/25 ROCE 16.3% · OPM 15% 95% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 12.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.7/20 RS sector -17.1% · RS bench 6.5% · 1Y 9.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 15.3 + 10.8 + 5.7 = 46.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26Kilitch Drugs (India) LtdKILITCH | 46.7/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | TURNING | 13.9/35 Revenue 14% · PAT 9.3% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 9.2/25 ROCE 13.4% · OPM 6.5% 95% evidence | 14.2/20 P/E 22.3× · PEG — 50% evidence | 9.4/20 RS sector -12.4% · RS bench 13.2% · 1Y 6.3%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.9 + 9.2 + 14.2 + 9.4 = 46.7 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 27Gufic BioSciences LtdGUFICBIO | 44.0/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.1/35 Revenue 16.6% · PAT 17.7% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 12.3% · OPM 18% 100% evidence | 2.3/20 P/E 59.5× · PEG 4.78 100% evidence | 8.8/20 RS sector -18.4% · RS bench 28.9% · 1Y 18.1%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.1 + 9.8 + 2.3 + 8.8 = 44 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28Alembic Pharmaceuticals LtdAPLLTD | 43.8/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.4/35 Revenue 14.1% · PAT 14.6% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 8.4/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 12.2/20 P/E 22.3× · PEG 1.74 100% evidence | 6.8/20 RS sector -24.1% · RS bench 6.2% · 1Y -10.6%5 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.4 + 8.4 + 12.2 + 6.8 = 43.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 29Sun Pharmaceutical Industries LtdSUNPHARMA | 43.6/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | TURNING | 16.9/35 Revenue 11.4% · PAT 16.5% · OPM change -2 pp 100% evidence | 17.3/25 ROCE 20.5% · OPM 29% 100% evidence | 4.3/20 P/E 34.9× · PEG 3.8 100% evidence | 5.1/20 RS sector -19% · RS bench 4.5% · 1Y 13.7%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.9 + 17.3 + 4.3 + 5.1 = 43.6 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 30Amrutanjan Health Care LtdAMRUTANJAN | 43.6/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.2/35 Revenue 10.7% · PAT -1.1% · OPM change -2.9 pp 95% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 24.8% · OPM 6.1% 95% evidence | 14.3/20 P/E 23× · PEG — 50% evidence | 1.2/20 RS sector -35.8% · RS bench -15.7% · 1Y -34.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.2 + 14.9 + 14.3 + 1.2 = 43.6 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 31Mankind Pharma LtdMANKIND | 43.4/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | BASING | 16.8/35 Revenue 14.2% · PAT 8% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 13.5% · OPM 26% 100% evidence | 8.1/20 P/E 44.6× · PEG 2.81 100% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -21.2% · RS bench 1.7% · 1Y -10.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 13.8 + 8.1 + 4.7 = 43.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 32FDC LtdFDC | 41.9/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BASING | 12.8/35 Revenue 3.5% · PAT 8.2% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 12.9/25 ROCE 15.4% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 12.1/20 P/E 18.6× · PEG 2 100% evidence | 4.1/20 RS sector -25.1% · RS bench -8.2% · 1Y -23.9%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.8 + 12.9 + 12.1 + 4.1 = 41.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 33Indoco Remedies LtdINDOCO | 40.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.2/35 Revenue 11.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5 pp 71% evidence | 4.4/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 6.0/20 RS sector -32.2% · RS bench 8.7% · 1Y -16.7%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.2 + 4.4 + 10 + 6 = 40.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 34Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltdthis pageBAFNAPH | 39.8/100Mixed-negative evidence60% evidence | TURNING | 11.5/35 Revenue -3.1% · PAT -5.8% · OPM change -11.3 pp 95% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE 11.9% · OPM 3.4% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 96.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 90.2% · 1Y —4 of 4 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.5 + 7.3 + 8.7 + 12.3 = 39.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 35Torrent Pharmaceuticals LtdTORNTPHARM | 38.9/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.6/35 Revenue 32.9% · PAT 7.7% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 14.2/25 ROCE 15.2% · OPM 34% 100% evidence | 0.8/20 P/E 82.5× · PEG 5.11 100% evidence | 7.3/20 RS sector -10.3% · RS bench 14.8% · 1Y 34.7%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 14.2 + 0.8 + 7.3 = 38.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 36Bajaj Healthcare LtdBAJAJHCARE | 38.3/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 9.8/35 Revenue 12.3% · PAT -59.1% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 10.3/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 17% 95% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 19.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.9/20 RS sector -29.9% · RS bench -8% · 1Y -22.7%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.8 + 10.3 + 12.3 + 5.9 = 38.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 37Zim Laboratories LtdZIMLAB | 37.6/100Mixed-negative evidence79% evidence | LEADER | 9.6/35 Revenue 7.5% · PAT -60.6% · OPM change -3.3 pp 71% evidence | 6.1/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 2.6% 95% evidence | 5.8/20 P/E 197× · PEG — 50% evidence | 16.1/20 RS sector 22.1% · RS bench 53.5% · 1Y 78.2%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.6 + 6.1 + 5.8 + 16.1 = 37.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 53.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 38Natco Pharma LtdNATCOPHARM | 36.9/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | BASING | 3.0/35 Revenue -20.8% · PAT -32.5% · OPM change -18 pp 100% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 17.4% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 19.0/20 P/E 12.7× · PEG 0.76 100% evidence | 0.8/20 RS sector -31.1% · RS bench -10.9% · 1Y -5.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 3 + 14.1 + 19 + 0.8 = 36.9 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 39Bharat Parenterals LtdBPLPHARMA | 35.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | 12.3/35 Revenue -11.2% · PAT 16% · OPM change -2.8 pp 71% evidence | 4.1/25 ROCE -1.9% · OPM 9.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 9.0/20 RS sector -12.8% · RS bench 22.9% · 1Y 11.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 12.3 + 4.1 + 10 + 9 = 35.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 40Biocon LtdBIOCON | 35.3/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.3/35 Revenue 9.8% · PAT -36.4% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 3.6% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 86.3× · PEG 0.82 100% evidence | 2.9/20 RS sector -22.6% · RS bench -0.2% · 1Y 5.4%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.3 + 7.7 + 11.4 + 2.9 = 35.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 41Cipla LtdCIPLA | 34.5/100Adverse evidence100% evidence | TURNING | 4.6/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT -37.7% · OPM change -9 pp 100% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 15.5% · OPM 17% 100% evidence | 11.9/20 P/E 31.5× · PEG 1.25 100% evidence | 5.7/20 RS sector -22.9% · RS bench 0.1% · 1Y -11.4%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.6 + 12.3 + 11.9 + 5.7 = 34.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 42Dr Reddys Laboratories LtdDRREDDY | 30.5/100Adverse evidence100% evidence | BASING | 3.7/35 Revenue -0.9% · PAT -44.6% · OPM change -14 pp 100% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 13% · OPM 11% 100% evidence | 13.3/20 P/E 30.7× · PEG 1.15 100% evidence | 1.8/20 RS sector -26.1% · RS bench -4% · 1Y -10%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 3.7 + 11.7 + 13.3 + 1.8 = 30.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 43Syncom Healthcare LtdSYNCOM | 49.8/100Thin evidence · provisional31% evidence | 17.1/35 Revenue -69.4% · PAT 63.5% · OPM change — 16% evidence | 6.9/25 ROCE -20.2% · OPM -225.7% 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 15.8/20 RS sector 29.1% · RS bench 45.7% · 1Y —9 of 12 weeks ahead to 2021-06-30 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 6.9 + 10 + 15.8 = 49.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 44Sai Parenterals LtdSAIPARENT | 37.4/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 32% evidence | 5.1/25 ROCE 5.3% · OPM 13.2% 95% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 109× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —6 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.7 + 5.1 + 8.6 + 10 = 37.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's share price today?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd trades at ₹317. The company is valued at ₹750 Cr. The stock sits at the very top of its 52-week range (₹132–₹317), +66.6% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 19 weeks in. — as of 18 September 2026.
What were Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd reported revenue of ₹26.6 Cr and net profit of ₹0.1 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue fell 23.2% and profit fell 97.6% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹0.03. The operating margin was 3.4%, 11.3 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 18 September 2026.
What is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's revenue?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd reported revenue of ₹26.6 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, −23.2% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹151 Cr (+3.4%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 5.9% a year. — as of 18 September 2026.
What is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's profit?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd earned ₹0.1 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −97.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹11.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 3.4% in the latest quarter. — as of 18 September 2026.
What is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's market cap?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹750 Cr at a share price of ₹317. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 18 September 2026.
What is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's P/E ratio?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd trades at a P/E of 96.3×, at the 95th percentile of its own 9-year range, against a long-run median of 36.7×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 18 September 2026.
Does Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd pay a dividend?
Not in its latest year — Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's dividend payout was 0% of profit in FY26. It did record a payout in 1 of its last 15 reported fiscal years, so there is a history but no current dividend. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 18 September 2026.
Is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd looks expensive: its P/E of 96.3× sits at the 95th percentile of its 9-year range (long-run median 36.7×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 18 September 2026.
Is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd growing?
Not right now — Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's latest numbers are shrinking: latest-quarter revenue −23.2% year on year, profit −97.6%, and the margin −11.3 pp at 3.4%. The earnings engine currently reads: deteriorating — as of 18 September 2026.
How is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd performing?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 19 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue fell 23.2% and profit fell 97.6% year on year. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 18 September 2026.
What stage is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd in?
Mixed — no clean majority across the growth curves, ROCE holding at 12.0% — the per-curve reads carry the story. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −3.1% latest, profit growth −5.8% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 18 September 2026.
Is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 19 of stage 2), trading +66.6% versus its 200-day average and at the very top of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 18 September 2026.
Will Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹317, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 19 weeks in. Its P/E of 96.3× sits at the 95th percentile of its own 9-year range. — as of 18 September 2026.
Who owns Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd?
Promoters hold 75.0% of Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd, foreign institutions 9.3%, domestic institutions null% and the public 15.7% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Promoters cut 13.3 points over 8 quarters. — as of 18 September 2026.
Does Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.39, and operating profit covers the interest bill 4×. FY26 borrowings were ₹37.0 Cr against equity of ₹96.0 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 18 September 2026.
What is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's capex?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd spent ₹59.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹25.0 Cr, with ₹3.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 18 September 2026.
What is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's cash flow?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd generated ₹15.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−10.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹25.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹11.0 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 18 September 2026.
Is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 209% of Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. Though the latest year ran at 136% — the trend is the thing to watch. In FY26, operating cash was ₹15.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹11.0 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 18 September 2026.
Where is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd in its business cycle?
Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 11.0%, against a 15-year band of −77.0%–15.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 3.4%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 18 September 2026.
What could break the Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: Foreign institutions moved +9.3 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 18 September 2026.
Is Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Bafna Pharmaceuticals Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 18 September 2026.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!