Rubicon Research Ltd
RUBICONRubicon Research Ltd is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/E at the 88th percentile of its own range says the market knows.
The sharpest disagreement: the engine is strong, but at the 88th percentile of its own range you are paying full price for it.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (35 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 88th percentile of its own 1-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +97.7% year on year, and 82% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the earnings grow into the multiple.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Rubicon Research Ltd trades at ₹1,619, in a confirmed uptrend and 35 weeks into that stage. That is +54.9% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 100% of a 52-week range of ₹577 to ₹1,619. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 37 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 35 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹1,619 it trades +54.9% versus its 200-day average and sits at 100% of its 52-week range (₹577–₹1,619).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10 months the stock moved +162% while the NIFTY 500 moved −1% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 37 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Rubicon Research Ltd trades at 93.0× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (88th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 65.5×, measured across 0.8 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 93.0× is at the pricey end of its own range (88th percentile), against a long-run median of 65.5× measured over 0.8 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Rubicon Research Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 5 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +36.6% | +64.5% | +41.0% | — |
| Profit | +84.3% | — | +51.4% | — |
| EPS | +71.4% | — | −24.4% | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
62.3/100 — rank 7 of 44 in Pharma - Formulators · 73% evidence confidence
Rubicon Research Ltd scores 62.3 out of 100 against the 44 companies it is compared with in Pharma - Formulators, ranking 7. Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 24.4 + 21.8 + 6.1 + 10 = 62.3. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Rubicon Research Ltd reported ₹534 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +51.7% year on year. That is the 5th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 6 years it has compounded at 37.2% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,754 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,936 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹1,754 Cr (+36.6% on the year), capping 6 years at 37.2% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹534 Cr, +51.7% year on year — the 5th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +46.7% growth against the decade's 37.2% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Rubicon Research Ltd's operating margin is 24.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +2.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 7 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −12.0% to 31.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 24.0%, +2.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 7 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −12.0%–31.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +1.7 pp year on year while gross margin went −2.4 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Rubicon Research Ltd earned ₹85.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +97.7% year on year. It is the 5th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹247 Cr. The 6-year compound rate is 30.9%. That is 15.9% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹43.0 Cr.
Jun 26 profit was ₹85.0 Cr, +97.7% year on year — the 5th consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹247 Cr (+84.3%), and the 6-year compound rate is 30.9%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +51.7% and the margin +2.0 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +90.6% vs revenue +46.7%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 82% of Rubicon Research Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹205 Cr of operating cash against ₹247 Cr of profit. After ₹284 Cr of capital spending, ₹−79.0 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹205 Cr against reported profit of ₹247 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−79.0 Cr after ₹284 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 82% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 82%: the cash cycle tightened 24 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.
Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 3.9× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Rubicon Research Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 371 days in FY26, down from 395 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹470 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹1,754 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹4.8 Cr, so roughly ₹1,783 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 106 days, inventory at 550 days — roughly 18.1 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 371 days, tighter than FY21's 395.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 550 days to sell; customers pay about 106 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 285 days — netting out to the 371-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹1,754 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹4.8 Cr — so the 371-day loop keeps roughly ₹1,783 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹470 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹121 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹41.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Rubicon Research Ltd earns a ROCE of 28% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −12% in FY22. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +11.5 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 14.1% net margin on 0.75× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 28%, recovered from a FY22 trough of −12% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 14.1% net margin × 0.75× asset turns × 1.81× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 19.1% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 23.5% − 12.0% = a +11.5 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every rupee reinvested creates more than a rupee of value — the engine compounds.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Rubicon Research Ltd carries total debt of ₹311 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,289 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.24 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.80 in FY25 to 0.24 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Mar 26: total debt of ₹311 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,289 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.24. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.80 (FY25) to 0.24 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
No holder of Rubicon Research Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — .
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Rubicon Research Ltd: the Z-score reads 8.61. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
Why it matters: a Z-score of 8.61 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 8.61.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Kwality Pharmaceuticals Ltd539997 | 75.3/100Favorable setup82% evidence | LEADER | 31.2/35 Revenue 35.7% · PAT 71.8% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence | 17.8/25 ROCE 24.1% · OPM 25% 76% evidence | 6.4/20 P/E 43.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 19.9/20 RS sector 85.6% · RS bench 118.9% · 1Y 204.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 31.2 + 17.8 + 6.4 + 19.9 = 75.3 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Bliss GVS Pharma LtdBLISSGVS | 70.0/100Favorable setup82% evidence | LEADER | 29.2/35 Revenue 20.6% · PAT 25.7% · OPM change 7 pp 95% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 16.9% · OPM 27% 76% evidence | 6.6/20 P/E 40.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 19.4/20 RS sector 68.7% · RS bench 97.8% · 1Y 192.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.2 + 14.8 + 6.6 + 19.4 = 70 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Lupin LtdLUPIN | 69.6/100Favorable setup93% evidence | ASLEEP | 29.9/35 Revenue 28.2% · PAT 49.2% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 19.1/25 ROCE 29.9% · OPM 30% 100% evidence | 16.3/20 P/E 17.2× · PEG 0.54 65% evidence | 4.3/20 RS sector -18.4% · RS bench -0.2% · 1Y 16.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.9 + 19.1 + 16.3 + 4.3 = 69.6 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -18.4% and the one-year return is 16.5%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 4Glenmark Pharmaceuticals LtdGLENMARK | 69.3/100Favorable setup100% evidence | ASLEEP | 31.0/35 Revenue 32.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 18.1/25 ROCE 39.8% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 12.9/20 P/E 21× · PEG 1.43 100% evidence | 7.3/20 RS sector -11.2% · RS bench 8.5% · 1Y 14.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 31 + 18.1 + 12.9 + 7.3 = 69.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Emcure Pharmaceuticals LtdEMCURE | 66.3/100Favorable setup75% evidence | LEADER | 26.8/35 Revenue 18.4% · PAT 32.2% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 18.2/25 ROCE 24% · OPM 21% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 35.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.4/20 RS sector 0% · RS bench 21.7% · 1Y 39.4%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.8 + 18.2 + 9.9 + 11.4 = 66.3 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 6Corona Remedies LtdCORONA | 65.4/100Favorable setup73% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.3/35 Revenue 18% · PAT 19.3% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 20.3/25 ROCE 33.3% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 11.8/20 P/E 61.6× · PEG 1.18 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —9 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.3 + 20.3 + 11.8 + 10 = 65.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Rubicon Research Ltdthis pageRUBICON | 62.3/100Mixed-positive evidence73% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.4/35 Revenue 46.8% · PAT 91.4% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 21.8/25 ROCE 28.4% · OPM 24% 100% evidence | 6.1/20 P/E 93× · PEG 2.46 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —12 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.4 + 21.8 + 6.1 + 10 = 62.3 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 8Ipca Laboratories LtdIPCALAB | 62.0/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | FADING | 26.6/35 Revenue 10.6% · PAT 68% · OPM change 6 pp 95% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 17% · OPM 24% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 32× · PEG — 50% evidence | 8.5/20 RS sector -7.6% · RS bench 12.7% · 1Y 25.1%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.6 + 15.8 + 11.1 + 8.5 = 62 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Accent Microcell LtdACCENTMIC | 61.8/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | LEADER | 17.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 26% evidence | 17.8/25 ROCE 24.9% · OPM 16% 95% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 31.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 17.1/20 RS sector 27.2% · RS bench 53.2% · 1Y 94.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 17.8 + 9.3 + 17.1 = 61.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Ajanta Pharma LtdAJANTPHARM | 61.7/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.7/35 Revenue 20.2% · PAT 22.2% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 19.4/25 ROCE 34.5% · OPM 26% 100% evidence | 5.6/20 P/E 40.4× · PEG 2.31 100% evidence | 15.0/20 RS sector 3.5% · RS bench 26.1% · 1Y 41%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.7 + 19.4 + 5.6 + 15 = 61.7 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 11Caplin Point Laboratories LtdCAPLIPOINT | 60.7/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 19.4/35 Revenue 15% · PAT 19.6% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 17.6/25 ROCE 24.6% · OPM 35% 100% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 28.3× · PEG 1.52 100% evidence | 13.9/20 RS sector -0.8% · RS bench 20.9% · 1Y 17.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.4 + 17.6 + 9.8 + 13.9 = 60.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Marksans Pharma LtdMARKSANS | 58.0/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 26.3/35 Revenue 19.6% · PAT 48% · OPM change 9 pp 100% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 6.3/20 P/E 29.2× · PEG 2.85 65% evidence | 9.8/20 RS sector -18.1% · RS bench 64.2% · 1Y 57.9%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.3 + 15.6 + 6.3 + 9.8 = 58 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Wockhardt LtdWOCKPHARMA | 55.8/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | LEADER | 25.1/35 Revenue 18.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 11 pp 74% evidence | 5.2/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 78.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.6/20 RS sector 3.4% · RS bench 25.4% · 1Y 31.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.1 + 5.2 + 8.9 + 16.6 = 55.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14RPG Life Sciences LtdRPGLIFE | 53.6/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence | LEADER | 12.0/35 Revenue 11.9% · PAT -34.1% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 17.4/25 ROCE 25.7% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 39.4× · PEG 1.43 65% evidence | 13.2/20 RS sector -1.9% · RS bench 20% · 1Y 18.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12 + 17.4 + 11 + 13.2 = 53.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 20%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 15Zydus Lifesciences LtdZYDUSLIFE | 52.9/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 12.0/35 Revenue 21.1% · PAT -2.5% · OPM change -8 pp 100% evidence | 16.5/25 ROCE 21.1% · OPM 24% 100% evidence | 14.5/20 P/E 23.3× · PEG 1.23 100% evidence | 9.9/20 RS sector -7.2% · RS bench 13.4% · 1Y 21.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12 + 16.5 + 14.5 + 9.9 = 52.9 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 16Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals LtdAKUMS | 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | LEADER | 13.5/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT -15.8% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE 14.9% · OPM 15% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 37.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.2/20 RS sector 15.8% · RS bench 40.3% · 1Y 51.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.5 + 10.9 + 9.7 + 18.2 = 52.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 40.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 17ERIS Lifesciences LtdERIS | 52.0/100Mixed-positive evidence76% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.7/35 Revenue 9.6% · PAT 62.2% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 14.1% · OPM 34% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 28.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.8/20 RS sector -13.9% · RS bench -9.8% · 1Y -21.3%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.7 + 14.3 + 11.2 + 5.8 = 52 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18Suven Life Sciences LtdSUVEN | 51.2/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence | LEADER | 19.9/35 Revenue 25% · PAT -80% · OPM change -997 pp 74% evidence | 2.1/25 ROCE -79.5% · OPM — 84% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 19.2/20 RS sector 33.1% · RS bench 60% · 1Y 36.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.9 + 2.1 + 10 + 19.2 = 51.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19J B Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals LtdJBCHEPHARM | 48.2/100Mixed-negative evidence96% evidence | 10.8/35 Revenue 5.9% · PAT 7.4% · OPM change -2 pp 88% evidence | 20.6/25 ROCE 25.4% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 4.1/20 P/E 53.8× · PEG 2.34 100% evidence | 12.7/20 RS sector 1% · RS bench 23.5% · 1Y 42.5%4 of 8 weeks ahead to 2026-07-19 100% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 10.8 + 20.6 + 4.1 + 12.7 = 48.2 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 20Fredun Pharmaceuticals Ltd539730 | 47.7/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0 pp 24% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 21.3% · OPM 14% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 58.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.5/20 RS sector -19% · RS bench 133.6% · 1Y 46.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.2 + 14.9 + 9.1 + 6.5 = 47.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21Kilitch Drugs (India) LtdKILITCH | 47.4/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.1/35 Revenue 14% · PAT 9.3% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE 13.4% · OPM 6.5% 95% evidence | 14.1/20 P/E 21.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 10.3/20 RS sector -15.6% · RS bench 3.6% · 1Y -19%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.1 + 8.9 + 14.1 + 10.3 = 47.4 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 22Lincoln Pharmaceuticals LtdLINCOLN | 46.7/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.2/35 Revenue 10% · PAT 11.5% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 15.1/25 ROCE 16.3% · OPM 15% 95% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 12.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.3/20 RS sector -13.5% · RS bench 5.6% · 1Y 9.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.2 + 15.1 + 10.1 + 6.3 = 46.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Alkem Laboratories LtdALKEM | 46.7/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.9/35 Revenue 13.4% · PAT -5.5% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence | 17.4/25 ROCE 21.2% · OPM 20% 76% evidence | 11.9/20 P/E 28.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 2.5/20 RS sector -22.4% · RS bench -4.6% · 1Y 12.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.9 + 17.4 + 11.9 + 2.5 = 46.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Sun Pharmaceutical Industries LtdSUNPHARMA | 46.1/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 17.3/35 Revenue 11.4% · PAT 16.5% · OPM change -2 pp 100% evidence | 17.1/25 ROCE 20.5% · OPM 29% 100% evidence | 4.1/20 P/E 36.7× · PEG 3.8 100% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -12.1% · RS bench 7.7% · 1Y 21.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 17.1 + 4.1 + 7.6 = 46.1 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 25Aurobindo Pharma LtdAUROPHARMA | 44.8/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 16.8/35 Revenue 9.1% · PAT 9.5% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 12.2/25 ROCE 12.9% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 4.4/20 P/E 24.9× · PEG 2.67 100% evidence | 11.4/20 RS sector 1.1% · RS bench 22.8% · 1Y 55.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 12.2 + 4.4 + 11.4 = 44.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26Strides Pharma Science LtdSTAR | 44.1/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence | FADING | 16.1/35 Revenue 8.1% · PAT 79.1% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 12.9/25 ROCE 18.3% · OPM 18% 95% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 15.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.8/20 RS sector -18.3% · RS bench -0.4% · 1Y 20.3%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.1 + 12.9 + 11.3 + 3.8 = 44.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 27Amrutanjan Health Care LtdAMRUTANJAN | 44.0/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.5/35 Revenue 10.7% · PAT -1.1% · OPM change -2.9 pp 95% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 24.8% · OPM 6.1% 95% evidence | 14.3/20 P/E 23× · PEG — 50% evidence | 1.4/20 RS sector -36.4% · RS bench -21% · 1Y -24.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.5 + 14.8 + 14.3 + 1.4 = 44 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 28Gufic BioSciences LtdGUFICBIO | 43.8/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.5/35 Revenue 16.6% · PAT 17.7% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 12.3% · OPM 18% 100% evidence | 2.2/20 P/E 57.6× · PEG 4.78 100% evidence | 8.5/20 RS sector -18.5% · RS bench 23% · 1Y 16.9%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.5 + 9.6 + 2.2 + 8.5 = 43.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 29Alembic Pharmaceuticals LtdAPLLTD | 42.7/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.8/35 Revenue 14.1% · PAT 14.6% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 8.2/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 12.5/20 P/E 21.9× · PEG 1.74 100% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -24.1% · RS bench -0.6% · 1Y -11.2%1 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 8.2 + 12.5 + 5.2 = 42.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 30FDC LtdFDC | 42.0/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.1/35 Revenue 3.5% · PAT 8.2% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 13.5/25 ROCE 16.7% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 11.9/20 P/E 18.7× · PEG 1.98 100% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -25.2% · RS bench -13.4% · 1Y -25.4%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.1 + 13.5 + 11.9 + 3.5 = 42 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 31Mankind Pharma LtdMANKIND | 41.8/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.0/35 Revenue 14.2% · PAT 8% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 13.7/25 ROCE 13.5% · OPM 26% 100% evidence | 5.4/20 P/E 47× · PEG 2.81 100% evidence | 5.7/20 RS sector -16.3% · RS bench 2.7% · 1Y -1.7%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 13.7 + 5.4 + 5.7 = 41.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 32Torrent Pharmaceuticals LtdTORNTPHARM | 40.4/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.8/35 Revenue 32.9% · PAT 7.7% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 15.2% · OPM 34% 100% evidence | 0.8/20 P/E 82.4× · PEG 5.11 100% evidence | 8.7/20 RS sector -5.3% · RS bench 15.4% · 1Y 35.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 14.1 + 0.8 + 8.7 = 40.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 33Bafna Pharmaceuticals LtdBAFNAPH | 40.2/100Mixed-negative evidence60% evidence | 11.6/35 Revenue -3.1% · PAT -5.8% · OPM change -11.3 pp 95% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE 11.9% · OPM 3.4% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 78.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 66.4% · 1Y — 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 11.6 + 7.3 + 9 + 12.3 = 40.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 34Zim Laboratories LtdZIMLAB | 39.4/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence | LEADER | 9.6/35 Revenue 7.5% · PAT -60.6% · OPM change -3.3 pp 71% evidence | 6.1/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 2.6% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 156× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.2/20 RS sector 6.1% · RS bench 27.8% · 1Y 41.7%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.6 + 6.1 + 8.5 + 15.2 = 39.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 27.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 35Indoco Remedies LtdINDOCO | 38.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.4/35 Revenue 11.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5 pp 71% evidence | 4.4/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -32.2% · RS bench -8.6% · 1Y -24.8%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.4 + 4.4 + 10 + 3.5 = 38.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 36Natco Pharma LtdNATCOPHARM | 37.6/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 3.0/35 Revenue -20.8% · PAT -32.5% · OPM change -18 pp 100% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 17.1% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 19.0/20 P/E 14.1× · PEG 0.76 100% evidence | 1.8/20 RS sector -22.1% · RS bench -4.6% · 1Y -0.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 3 + 13.8 + 19 + 1.8 = 37.6 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 37Biocon LtdBIOCON | 37.5/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 13.6/35 Revenue 9.8% · PAT -36.4% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 3.6% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 93.4× · PEG 0.82 100% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -13.7% · RS bench 5.6% · 1Y 21.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.6 + 7.7 + 10 + 6.2 = 37.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 38Bajaj Healthcare LtdBAJAJHCARE | 37.2/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | TURNING | 9.9/35 Revenue 12.3% · PAT -59.1% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 10.4/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 17% 95% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 19.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.9/20 RS sector -30.3% · RS bench -13.3% · 1Y -26.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.9 + 10.4 + 11 + 5.9 = 37.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 39Bharat Parenterals Ltd541096 | 33.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 12.5/35 Revenue -11.2% · PAT 16% · OPM change -2.8 pp 71% evidence | 4.1/25 ROCE -1.8% · OPM 9.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 7.3/20 RS sector -20.9% · RS bench 7.8% · 1Y -2.7%10 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.5 + 4.1 + 10 + 7.3 = 33.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 40Cipla LtdCIPLA | 33.0/100Adverse evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 4.7/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT -37.7% · OPM change -9 pp 100% evidence | 11.9/25 ROCE 15.5% · OPM 17% 100% evidence | 11.7/20 P/E 32.7× · PEG 1.25 100% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -19.3% · RS bench -0.5% · 1Y -2.4%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.7 + 11.9 + 11.7 + 4.7 = 33 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 41Dr Reddys Laboratories LtdDRREDDY | 30.4/100Adverse evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 3.8/35 Revenue -0.9% · PAT -44.6% · OPM change -14 pp 100% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 13% · OPM 11% 100% evidence | 13.5/20 P/E 31.1× · PEG 1.15 100% evidence | 1.4/20 RS sector -24.2% · RS bench -6.8% · 1Y -0.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 3.8 + 11.7 + 13.5 + 1.4 = 30.4 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 42Influx Healthtech LtdINFLUX | 63.6/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | FADING | 19.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 26% evidence | 20.8/25 ROCE 40% · OPM 19% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 32.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.5/20 RS sector 1.4% · RS bench 23.1% · 1Y 98.2%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.3 + 20.8 + 10 + 13.5 = 63.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 43Syncom Healthcare LtdSYNCOM | 50.0/100Thin evidence · provisional31% evidence | 17.1/35 Revenue -69.4% · PAT 63.5% · OPM change — 16% evidence | 6.9/25 ROCE -20.2% · OPM -225.7% 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 16.0/20 RS sector 29.1% · RS bench 45.7% · 1Y —9 of 12 weeks ahead to 2021-06-30 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 6.9 + 10 + 16 = 50 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 44Sai Parenterals LtdSAIPARENT | 37.2/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 32% evidence | 4.9/25 ROCE 6% · OPM 13.2% 95% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 117× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —5 of 5 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.7 + 4.9 + 8.6 + 10 = 37.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Rubicon Research Ltd's share price today?
Rubicon Research Ltd trades at ₹1,619. The company is valued at ₹26,801 Cr. The stock sits at the very top of its 52-week range (₹577–₹1,619), +54.9% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 35 weeks in. — as of 14 August 2026.
What were Rubicon Research Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Rubicon Research Ltd reported revenue of ₹534 Cr and net profit of ₹85.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 51.7% and profit rose 97.7% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹5.13. The operating margin was 24.0%, 2.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Rubicon Research Ltd's revenue?
Rubicon Research Ltd reported revenue of ₹534 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +51.7% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹1,754 Cr (+36.6%). Over the last 6 years revenue compounded at 37.2% a year. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Rubicon Research Ltd's profit?
Rubicon Research Ltd earned ₹85.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +97.7% year on year — the 5th straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹247 Cr. The operating margin ran 24.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Rubicon Research Ltd's market cap?
Rubicon Research Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹26,801 Cr at a share price of ₹1,619. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Rubicon Research Ltd's P/E ratio?
Rubicon Research Ltd trades at a P/E of 93.0×, at the 88th percentile of its own 1-year range, against a long-run median of 65.5×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Rubicon Research Ltd pay a dividend?
Yes — Rubicon Research Ltd's dividend payout was 10% of profit in FY26, and it recorded a payout in 3 of its last 7 reported fiscal years. One of those years shows a negative ratio because profit itself was negative. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Rubicon Research Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Rubicon Research Ltd looks expensive: its P/E of 93.0× sits at the 88th percentile of its 1-year range (long-run median 65.5×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Rubicon Research Ltd growing?
Yes — Rubicon Research Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +51.7% year on year, profit +97.7%, and the margin +2.0 pp at 24.0%. The 6-year compound rates are 37.2% (revenue) and 30.9% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 14 August 2026.
How is Rubicon Research Ltd performing?
Rubicon Research Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 35 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 51.7% and profit rose 97.7% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 37 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Rubicon Research Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 35 of stage 2), trading +54.9% versus its 200-day average and at the very top of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Rubicon Research Ltd beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Rubicon Research Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 37 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10 months the stock moved +162% against the NIFTY 500's −1% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 14 August 2026.
Will Rubicon Research Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Rubicon Research Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹1,619, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 35 weeks in. Its P/E of 93.0× sits at the 88th percentile of its own 1-year range. — as of 14 August 2026.
Who owns Rubicon Research Ltd?
Promoters hold 59.8% of Rubicon Research Ltd, foreign institutions 7.5%, domestic institutions 9.4% and the public 23.3% (latest quarter). No holder moved a full point over the last two years — the register is quiet. — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Rubicon Research Ltd have too much debt?
No — Rubicon Research Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.24, and operating profit covers the interest bill 10×. FY26 borrowings were ₹311 Cr against equity of ₹1,289 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Rubicon Research Ltd's capex?
Rubicon Research Ltd spent ₹470 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹284 Cr, with ₹41.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Rubicon Research Ltd's cash flow?
Rubicon Research Ltd generated ₹205 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−79.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹284 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹247 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Rubicon Research Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 82% of Rubicon Research Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹205 Cr against reported profit of ₹247 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 14 August 2026.
How financially safe is Rubicon Research Ltd?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 8.61 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 14 August 2026.
Where is Rubicon Research Ltd in its business cycle?
Rubicon Research Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 23.0%, against a 7-year band of −12.0%–31.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 24.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 14 August 2026.
What could break the Rubicon Research Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: the engine is strong, but at the 88th percentile of its own range you are paying full price for it. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Rubicon Research Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Rubicon Research Ltd is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/E at the 88th percentile of its own range says the market knows. The sharpest open question: whether the earnings grow into the multiple. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 14 August 2026.