Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd
EMCUREEmcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +35.6% in a year against a +32.8% price move.
Biggest watch item: the price is already 58 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (58 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 55th percentile of its own 2-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +35.8% year on year, and 133% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd trades at ₹1,932, in a confirmed uptrend and 58 weeks into that stage. That is +17.7% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 93% of a 52-week range of ₹1,319 to ₹1,978. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 13 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 58 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹1,932 it trades +17.7% versus its 200-day average and sits at 93% of its 52-week range (₹1,319–₹1,978).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 2.1 years the stock moved +42% while the NIFTY 500 moved +2% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 13 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Story check
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's story is not scored yet against the markers our research file set on 17 May 2026. Where it sits in its own cycle: STEADY_COMPOUNDER_WITH_INFLECTION. Our fortnightly research layers last read it on 19 July 2026.
Our read, 17 May 2026. Transition from generic-heavy to innovator-partnered chronic specialist — FY26 crossed the $1 billion revenue milestone with adjusted PAT up 41%; now leveraging Novo Nordisk GLP-1 exclusivity and a multi-geography biosimilar platform to compound at mid-teens growth with 75-100 bps annual margin expansion.
From the numbers. PE at 34.2x, ratio-to-median 1.007 (50th percentile of 10Y range), matrix label STRONG_OPPORTUNITY. EPS cycle labeled GOLDEN_SETUP per pe_pb_cycle data. DII buying materially: 3.87%→6.10% (Dec 2024→Dec 2025, +223 bps).…
From the price. Price stage 2, week 58 — above its 200-day line, relative strength rising.
From the research. Transition from generic-heavy to innovator-partnered chronic specialist — FY26 crossed the $1 billion revenue milestone with adjusted PAT up 41%; now leveraging Novo Nordisk GLP-1 exclusivity and a multi-geography…
🚨 Where they disagree. PE at 34.2x, ratio-to-median 1.007 (50th percentile of 10Y range), matrix label STRONG_OPPORTUNITY. EPS cycle labeled GOLDEN_SETUP per pe_pb_cycle data. DII buying materially: 3.87%→6.10% (Dec 2024→Dec 2025, +223 bps). FII also increasing: 3.05%→3.59% (+54 bps). The stock is not in a classic depressed setup (PE at median, not trough) but EPS is compounding at 33%+ annually — GOLDEN_SETUP means the EPS trajectory justifies re-rating if execution continues. Smoothed YoY PE delta is −16.44%, consistent with INFLECTION_UP.
What is proven. Transition from generic-heavy to innovator-partnered chronic specialist — FY26 crossed the $1 billion revenue milestone with adjusted PAT up 41%; now leveraging Novo Nordisk GLP-1 exclusivity and a multi-geography biosimilar platform to compound at mid-teens growth with 75-100 bps annual margin expansion.
What is not proven yet. 5 documented consistency failures across 4 concalls: debt-free timeline slipped 3x (FY26→FY27→FY28+), Amphotericin B pan-EU missed 2x, US market pivot, Canada semaglutide pivot — pattern of optimistic forward guidance walked back without explanation.
Layer 1 read, 19 July 2026 — KEEP. De-rating compounder: EPS grew ~36% to ~49 while the PE fell to the 39th percentile of its own history. Emcure crossed $1bn revenue with FY26 PAT +33% (adjusted +41%) and compounded PAT above 24% YoY in every FY26 quarter, yet its multiple compressed -33% over eight quarters to the 39th percentile with MoS +33.6% depressed — the market has under-priced the earnings. The only meaningful blemish is a track record of over-promising on deleveraging and launch timing, but those are timing slips, not an earnings break.
What would change Layer 1’s mind. Two consecutive quarters of domestic revenue growth stalling (M1 Zuventus-recovery proof failing) OR EBITDA margin dropping below 19.5% (M4) — that would show the chronic-mix operating leverage has stopped compounding and the compressing multiple was warning, not opportunity.
Layer 2 read, 19 July 2026 — ADVANCE. Sector IN_FOCUS + defensive-hedge tailwind confirm a genuine de-rating compounder — earnings up, multiple compressed, no external negative. EPS ran FY25 35.96 -> FY26 48.76 with PAT compounding above 24% YoY in every FY26 quarter while the PE COMPRESSED to the 39th percentile (MONOTONIC_COMPRESSION, slope -23.9%/yr) — a de-rating compounder, MoS +33.6% depressed. Externally the sector is IN_FOCUS with a TAILWIND, its schema-2.0 timeline calls it 'a durable earnings-led compounder', and chain-11 makes Pharma a defensive BENEFICIARY if the FPI flow thesis reverses. The one caveat — R1 management optimism bias, 5-6 MISS on deleveraging and launch timing — is a timing slip on secondary promises, not the core trajectory.
What would change Layer 2’s mind. An FDA/regulatory action or Import Alert on an Emcure facility (the sector second-order theses flag this class as a live pharma risk) that hits the earnings base, OR sector aggregate profit stalling while the multiple stays full, would flip ADVANCE toward DROP. A further deleveraging-timeline slip alone would not.
Layer 3 read, 19 July 2026 — DEPLOY. Guidance-optimism is a credibility flag, not a governance fail — Emcure keeps DELIVERING while the multiple compressed. The Timeline's HIGH management-risk is entirely on forward timelines (debt-free date slipped three times, launch dates deferred) — but every DELIVERY promise beat: FY26 revenue Rs9,204 Cr +16.6% with margin +80bps and Q1 PAT +40.5%. PAT rose 23.9% led by revenue +16.7%, promoters held 77.87% and DII accumulated to 6.1%, and the red-flags sweep surfaced no SEBI/RPT/auditor action. Overall risk is MEDIUM: FX drag on Europe (~1,000bps of reported growth) and GLP-1 generic competition.
What would change Layer 3’s mind. A DELIVERY miss (a quarter where reported revenue/PAT falls short of guidance, not just a walked-back timeline) OR a fresh SEBI/RPT/auditor governance action — either would escalate management from WATCHLIST to FAIL and flip DEPLOY->DROP.
The test written in advance. Management Guidance Credibility — Systematic Optimism Bias — Management Guidance Credibility — Systematic Optimism Bias Q1 FY27 domestic revenue growth (must show ex-Zuventus recovery to 10%+) and Bevacizumab launch status by the next result.
The test written in advance. Generic Competition in GLP-1 (Povista Market Share Erosion) — Generic Competition in GLP-1 (Povista Market Share Erosion) Povista volume trajectory in Q1 FY27 concall; price differential vs generic semaglutide by the next result.
The test written in advance. Zuventus Restructuring Drag Extends into H1 FY27 — Zuventus Restructuring Drag Extends into H1 FY27 Q1 FY27 domestic revenue vs Q4 FY26 exit rate; management comment on Zuventus field force size and attrition by the next result.
What the company does. FY26 delivered Rs 9,204 Cr revenue (+16.6% YoY) and adjusted PAT Rs 1,008 Cr (+41%), with EBITDA margin expanding 80 bps to 19.4% — the operating leverage story is live. Chronic therapy now 50% of domestic mix; Novo Nordisk Semaglutide (Povista) exclusivity in India + Europe biosimilar ramp (Amphotericin B, Bevacizumab) opens two separate PAT acceleration channels. PE sits at median (50th percentile of 10Y range) at 34.2x while EPS is compounding at 33%+ annually — a coiled spring if management executes on FY27 low-to-mid teen guidance.
| Dial | Now | Was | Why it matters | Watch line |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product Mix Shift — Chronic Therapy… | HIGH | — | Chronic mix 50% of domestic and climbing; Sanofi OAD partnership + Novo Nordisk GLP-1 + Women's Health compounding toward… | Q1 FY27 domestic revenue growth (must show ex-Zuventus recovery to 10%+) and Bevacizumab launch status |
| Geographical Expansion — Europe + Canada… | HIGH | — | International revenue Rs 5,177 Cr FY26 (+22.2% YoY, 56% of consolidated) led by Europe +25.5% (Mayne integration + Amphotericin… | Q1 FY27 domestic revenue growth (must show ex-Zuventus recovery to 10%+) and Bevacizumab launch status |
| Operating Leverage — EBITDA Margin… | HIGH | — | FY26 EBITDA Rs 1,789 Cr (+21.8%) on 19.4% margin (+80 bps); FY27 guided 75-100 bps further expansion via operating leverage and… | Q1 FY27 domestic revenue growth (must show ex-Zuventus recovery to 10%+) and Bevacizumab launch status |
| New Product Launch — Biosimilar Pipeline… | MEDIUM_HIGH | — | 3 filing-ready biosimilar assets with multi-market unlocks in FY27: Amphotericin B pan-European + ROW expansion, Bevacizumab… | Q1 FY27 domestic revenue growth (must show ex-Zuventus recovery to 10%+) and Bevacizumab launch status |
| Povista Semaglutide — GLP-1 Ramp… | MEDIUM_HIGH | — | Exclusive rDNA Semaglutide in India via Novo Nordisk; post-price-cut April 2026 adoption ramping with 1,000 reps deployed and… | Q1 FY27 domestic revenue growth (must show ex-Zuventus recovery to 10%+) and Bevacizumab launch status |
| Zuventus Integration Recovery (Base… | MEDIUM | — | Rs 80-90 Cr Q4 FY26 revenue loss from Zuventus restructuring; management claims April on track — Q1 FY27 is the first… | Q1 FY27 domestic revenue growth (must show ex-Zuventus recovery to 10%+) and Bevacizumab launch status |
Lever 3 · Management change — BUILDING. Chronic mix 50% of domestic and climbing; Sanofi OAD partnership + Novo Nordisk GLP-1 + Women's Health compounding toward double-digit domestic outperformance vs 8-9% industry growth. What proves it keeps working: Product Mix Shift — Chronic Therapy Reaching 50% of Domestic. It stops working if Q1 FY27 domestic revenue growth (must show ex-Zuventus recovery to 10%+) and Bevacizumab launch status.
Lever 10 · New geographies — BUILDING. International revenue Rs 5,177 Cr FY26 (+22.2% YoY, 56% of consolidated) led by Europe +25.5% (Mayne integration + Amphotericin B) and Canada +18.7% (market share + new launches). What proves it keeps working: Geographical Expansion — Europe + Canada Multi-Leg Growth. It stops working if Q1 FY27 domestic revenue growth (must show ex-Zuventus recovery to 10%+) and Bevacizumab launch status.
Lever 5 · Regulatory approval — BUILDING. FY26 EBITDA Rs 1,789 Cr (+21.8%) on 19.4% margin (+80 bps); FY27 guided 75-100 bps further expansion via operating leverage and productivity gains. What proves it keeps working: Operating Leverage — EBITDA Margin Expansion on Rs 9,000+ Cr Base. It stops working if Q1 FY27 domestic revenue growth (must show ex-Zuventus recovery to 10%+) and Bevacizumab launch status.
Lever 1 · Operating leverage — BUILDING. 3 filing-ready biosimilar assets with multi-market unlocks in FY27: Amphotericin B pan-European + ROW expansion, Bevacizumab (CDSCO SEC endorsed, H1 FY27 launch), Lenacapavir DMF filed (FY27 registration). What proves it keeps working: New Product Launch — Biosimilar Pipeline (Amphotericin B Europe, Bevacizumab, Lenacapavir). It stops working if Q1 FY27 domestic revenue growth (must show ex-Zuventus recovery to 10%+) and Bevacizumab launch status.
Sources: our stock research file (17 May 2026) · quarterly results through Jun 26 · the company’s own earnings calls. The story check is re-scored every results season; the record below never changes.
| Section | Where it is now | Vs a year ago | The one thing to watch next | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | see the section | — | Product Mix Shift — Chronic Therapy Reaching 50% of Domestic | |
| Revenue | ₹2,470 Cr | — | Geographical Expansion — Europe + Canada Multi-Leg Growth | |
| Safety | see the section | — | Operating Leverage — EBITDA Margin Expansion on Rs 9,000+… | |
| Margin | 19% | — | New Product Launch — Biosimilar Pipeline (Amphotericin B… | |
| Debt | see the section | — | Zuventus Integration Recovery (Base Business Normalization) |
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd reported ₹2,580 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +22.8% year on year. That is the 9th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 7 years it has compounded at 10.0% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹9,204 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹9,683 Cr.
Why this happened. International crossed domestic for the first time in FY26 — Rs 5,177 Cr vs Rs 4,027 Cr domestic. Europe at Rs 1,850 Cr (+25.5%) is now a structural growth engine: Mayne acquisition integrated, Amphotericin B launched in select European markets H2 FY26 with pan-European + ROW expansion in FY27. Canada Rs 1,487 Cr (+18.7%) through market share gains. ROW Rs 1,840 Cr (+21.8%) with ARV order book strength plus non-ARV diversification push. Currency headwind at 7-8% (Europe 11-12%) is the ongoing drag; FY27 guided on 92 USD-INR assumption.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹9,204 Cr (+16.6% on the year), capping 7 years at 10.0% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹2,580 Cr, +22.8% year on year — the 9th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +18.3% growth against the decade's 10.0% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +18.3% over the last 4 quarters against +18.3%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit +32.2% vs +37.3%/yr — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's operating margin is 21.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +1.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 8 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 14.0% to 24.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
Why this happened. Amphotericin B launched select European markets H2 FY26 (slipped from committed pan-European scope); FY27 is the full expansion year. Bevacizumab for wet AMD received CDSCO SEC endorsement — H1 FY27 launch targeted pending final approval. Lenacapavir (HIV long-acting, Gilead voluntary licensee — one of only 6 globally) filed DMF, registration sought FY27. Each of these is a differentiated, high-complexity product with limited competition. European gross margin expected to improve as Amphotericin B and complex injectables scale.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 21.0%, +1.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 8 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 14.0%–24.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +0.8 pp year on year while gross margin went −3.4 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd earned ₹292 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +35.8% year on year. It is the 9th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹941 Cr. The 7-year compound rate is 24.0%. That is 11.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹215 Cr.
Jun 26 profit was ₹292 Cr, +35.8% year on year — the 9th consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹941 Cr (+33.1%), and the 7-year compound rate is 24.0%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +22.8% and the margin +1.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +33.0% vs revenue +18.3%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 133% of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹944 Cr of operating cash against ₹941 Cr of profit. After ₹633 Cr of capital spending, ₹311 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹944 Cr against reported profit of ₹941 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹311 Cr after ₹633 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 133% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 133%: the cash cycle tightened 48 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.
Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 1.9× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 164 days in FY26, down from 212 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹2,145 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹9,204 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹25.2 Cr, so roughly ₹4,135 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 102 days, inventory at 239 days — roughly 7.9 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 164 days, tighter than FY21's 212.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 239 days to sell; customers pay about 102 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 177 days — netting out to the 164-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹9,204 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹25.2 Cr — so the 164-day loop keeps roughly ₹4,135 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹2,145 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹1,111 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹172 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd earns a ROCE of 24% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 11% in FY20. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 10.2% net margin on 0.96× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 24%, recovered from a FY20 trough of 11% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 10.2% net margin × 0.96× asset turns × 1.94× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 19.0% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The quarterly return curves and the return-on-invested-capital overlay, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 7.2% on reported income across 12 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd carries ₹1,558 Cr of borrowings against ₹4,950 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.31. Operating profit covers the interest bill 13×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹2,310 Cr to ₹1,558 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹2,145 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
Why this happened. Zuventus comprises 40% of Emcure's ~4,000-person total field force. Q4 FY26 took a Rs 80-90 Cr revenue loss as the acute care segment restructured under new management post-Mr. Goel's departure. Attrition ran above-normal (vs 20-30% baseline). Management reports April recovery visible per internal targets. The Q1 FY27 concall result is the critical validation point — if Zuventus returns to normalized growth, Q4 FY26 was a one-time drag and domestic recovers to guided low double-digit.
FY26: borrowings of ₹1,558 Cr against equity of ₹4,950 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.31. Operating profit covers the interest bill 13×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹2,310 Cr to ₹1,558 Cr while capital spending ran ₹2,145 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.
The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 7.2% on reported income across 12 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Domestic institutions added 4.5 points of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd over 7 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 8.5% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +2.0 points over the same window, to 4.9%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
Why this happened. This is the structural re-rating driver. Emcure spent 2 years integrating the Sanofi cardiac portfolio, acquiring Zuventus, and building out diabetes + GLP-1 + CNS + Oncology franchise. In-licensing now contributes 15% of domestic sales. The payoff in FY26: chronic grew faster than acute, Women's Health and Cardiac both outperformed. The Q4 FY26 domestic disappointment (Rs 977 Cr, +5.2%) was Zuventus-specific (Rs 80-90 Cr revenue loss); base business ex-Zuventus grew 9-10%. Management's field force productivity has expanded from Rs 5.4 lakh to Rs 7 lakh/rep over 2 years. If chronic mix continues to rise and Zuventus integration normalizes, domestic EBITDA margin expands structurally.
The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: +4.5 points over 7 quarters to 8.5%; Foreign institutions: +2.0 points over 7 quarters to 4.9%; Promoters: −0.3 points over 7 quarters to 77.8%.
Why the register moved: domestic institutions drove it (+4.5 points), alongside foreign institutions (+2.0 points) — steady accumulation by institutions reading the same numbers this page reads.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
Why this happened. EBITDA margin expanded for 3 of 4 quarters in FY26 (dipped in Q4 on Zuventus drag). The management's 5-year roadmap targets 300-400 bps expansion to ~23-24%, with 100 bps annually for next 2-3 years. The levers are concrete: field force productivity improvement (Rs 5.4→7 lakh/rep), operating leverage on the Rs 9,200 Cr revenue base, and in-licensing at mid-teens EBITDA margins. Q4 FY26 EBITDA margin 19.7% (+130 bps YoY) on Rs 485 Cr suggests the underlying trajectory is intact despite Zuventus noise.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd trades at 35.6× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (55th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 35.2×, measured across 2.1 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 35.6× is mid-range by its own standards (55th percentile), against a long-run median of 35.2× measured over 2.1 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +35.6% against a +32.8% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
The PEG ratio and its quarterly curve, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 7.2% on reported income across 12 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Stage: Consistent Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd reads as consistent on its fundamental arc. Consistent — revenue and profit growth have stayed positive through the window, with ROCE at 24.0% and holding. The read is built from 9 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: steady curves with healthy returns are the compounding setup — the risk is the price, not the business.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +16.6% | +15.4% | +12.8% | — |
| Profit | +33.1% | +18.7% | +17.6% | — |
| EPS | +35.6% | +18.3% | +16.1% | — |
| Share price | +32.8% | — | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
66.3/100 — rank 5 of 44 in Pharma - Formulators · 75% evidence confidence
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd scores 66.3 out of 100 against the 44 companies it is compared with in Pharma - Formulators, ranking 5. Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 26.8 + 18.2 + 9.9 + 11.4 = 66.3. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Said versus delivered
What Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's management promised, set against what actually arrived — 4 tracked promises on the record. Read straight from the company’s own earnings calls. A promise that slipped stays on this page after it is met.
🚨 Amphotericin B Pan-European Launch Scope Fell Short of Prior Commitments · 5 May 2026. In both the Nov 2025 and Feb 2026 calls, management explicitly committed to Amphotericin B launches across Europe by year-end FY26. The latest call (May 2026) confirms that only select European markets were covered in H2 FY26, with broader European and ROW expansion now deferred to FY27. No clear explanation was provided in the latest call for why the pan-European scope was not achieved as consistently promised across two prior calls.
Canada Semaglutide Strategy Pivots from Own Filing to Third-Party Partnership · 5 May 2026. The Nov 2025 call included an explicit on-record confirmation that plans to file Emcure's own semaglutide product in Canada by end of FY26 would proceed as planned. The latest call (May 2026) instead describes a near-term Canadian launch via a Dr. Reddy's distribution partnership for Quebec, while own-product commercialization is repositioned as a mid-term opportunity. The present-tense phrasing 'we are also filing' implies the end-of-FY26 filing commitment was not completed on schedule, and the near-term Canadian GLP-1 strategy has materially shifted from own-product to third-party without explanation.
🚨 Debt Reduction Timeline Extended · 4 February 2026. In the November 2025 call, management explicitly guided that the company would be debt-free within 18 to 24 months (by the end of FY27). However, in the February 2026 call, just one quarter later, this timeline was significantly pushed out to 24 to 36 months without clear justification for the additional year-long delay. Earlier call (Nov 2025): “We expect now to be debt-free by end of next year. So it”. Later call (Feb 2026): “We expect the debt to go off the balance sheet probably in the next 24 to 36 months.”
US Market Entry Reversal · 4 February 2026. During the August 2025 call, management stated that the uptake for Liposomal Amphotericin B in the US market would be 'near term' within the next 4 to 6 months. Contradicting this near-term growth narrative, the February 2026 call dismisses the region entirely, claiming the company has no significant presence there to insulate themselves from geopolitical risks. Earlier call (Aug 2025): “UK and U.S. will be more near term in the next 4 to 6 months. ... The full effect of all the approvals and the max volumes will probably materialize in the next 12 months... U.S. will be more near term”. Later call (Feb 2026): “In a lighter vein, what really happens with us is that we do not have any significant presence in the US. To that extent, we do not have to worry about which side of the bed President Trump gets up on.”
Every quote above is taken word for word from the company’s own earnings calls.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Kwality Pharmaceuticals Ltd539997 | 75.3/100Favorable setup82% evidence | LEADER | 31.2/35 Revenue 35.7% · PAT 71.8% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence | 17.8/25 ROCE 24.1% · OPM 25% 76% evidence | 6.4/20 P/E 43.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 19.9/20 RS sector 85.6% · RS bench 118.9% · 1Y 204.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 31.2 + 17.8 + 6.4 + 19.9 = 75.3 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Bliss GVS Pharma LtdBLISSGVS | 70.0/100Favorable setup82% evidence | LEADER | 29.2/35 Revenue 20.6% · PAT 25.7% · OPM change 7 pp 95% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 16.9% · OPM 27% 76% evidence | 6.6/20 P/E 40.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 19.4/20 RS sector 68.7% · RS bench 97.8% · 1Y 192.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.2 + 14.8 + 6.6 + 19.4 = 70 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Lupin LtdLUPIN | 69.6/100Favorable setup93% evidence | ASLEEP | 29.9/35 Revenue 28.2% · PAT 49.2% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 19.1/25 ROCE 29.9% · OPM 30% 100% evidence | 16.3/20 P/E 17.2× · PEG 0.54 65% evidence | 4.3/20 RS sector -18.4% · RS bench -0.2% · 1Y 16.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.9 + 19.1 + 16.3 + 4.3 = 69.6 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -18.4% and the one-year return is 16.5%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 4Glenmark Pharmaceuticals LtdGLENMARK | 69.3/100Favorable setup100% evidence | ASLEEP | 31.0/35 Revenue 32.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 18.1/25 ROCE 39.8% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 12.9/20 P/E 21× · PEG 1.43 100% evidence | 7.3/20 RS sector -11.2% · RS bench 8.5% · 1Y 14.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 31 + 18.1 + 12.9 + 7.3 = 69.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltdthis pageEMCURE | 66.3/100Favorable setup75% evidence | LEADER | 26.8/35 Revenue 18.4% · PAT 32.2% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 18.2/25 ROCE 24% · OPM 21% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 35.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.4/20 RS sector 0% · RS bench 21.7% · 1Y 39.4%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.8 + 18.2 + 9.9 + 11.4 = 66.3 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 6Corona Remedies LtdCORONA | 65.4/100Favorable setup73% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.3/35 Revenue 18% · PAT 19.3% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 20.3/25 ROCE 33.3% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 11.8/20 P/E 61.6× · PEG 1.18 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —9 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.3 + 20.3 + 11.8 + 10 = 65.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Rubicon Research LtdRUBICON | 62.3/100Mixed-positive evidence73% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.4/35 Revenue 46.8% · PAT 91.4% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 21.8/25 ROCE 28.4% · OPM 24% 100% evidence | 6.1/20 P/E 93× · PEG 2.46 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —12 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.4 + 21.8 + 6.1 + 10 = 62.3 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 8Ipca Laboratories LtdIPCALAB | 62.0/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | FADING | 26.6/35 Revenue 10.6% · PAT 68% · OPM change 6 pp 95% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 17% · OPM 24% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 32× · PEG — 50% evidence | 8.5/20 RS sector -7.6% · RS bench 12.7% · 1Y 25.1%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.6 + 15.8 + 11.1 + 8.5 = 62 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Accent Microcell LtdACCENTMIC | 61.8/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | LEADER | 17.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 26% evidence | 17.8/25 ROCE 24.9% · OPM 16% 95% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 31.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 17.1/20 RS sector 27.2% · RS bench 53.2% · 1Y 94.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 17.8 + 9.3 + 17.1 = 61.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Ajanta Pharma LtdAJANTPHARM | 61.7/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.7/35 Revenue 20.2% · PAT 22.2% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 19.4/25 ROCE 34.5% · OPM 26% 100% evidence | 5.6/20 P/E 40.4× · PEG 2.31 100% evidence | 15.0/20 RS sector 3.5% · RS bench 26.1% · 1Y 41%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.7 + 19.4 + 5.6 + 15 = 61.7 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 11Caplin Point Laboratories LtdCAPLIPOINT | 60.7/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 19.4/35 Revenue 15% · PAT 19.6% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 17.6/25 ROCE 24.6% · OPM 35% 100% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 28.3× · PEG 1.52 100% evidence | 13.9/20 RS sector -0.8% · RS bench 20.9% · 1Y 17.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.4 + 17.6 + 9.8 + 13.9 = 60.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Marksans Pharma LtdMARKSANS | 58.0/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 26.3/35 Revenue 19.6% · PAT 48% · OPM change 9 pp 100% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 6.3/20 P/E 29.2× · PEG 2.85 65% evidence | 9.8/20 RS sector -18.1% · RS bench 64.2% · 1Y 57.9%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.3 + 15.6 + 6.3 + 9.8 = 58 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Wockhardt LtdWOCKPHARMA | 55.8/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | LEADER | 25.1/35 Revenue 18.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 11 pp 74% evidence | 5.2/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 78.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.6/20 RS sector 3.4% · RS bench 25.4% · 1Y 31.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.1 + 5.2 + 8.9 + 16.6 = 55.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14RPG Life Sciences LtdRPGLIFE | 53.6/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence | LEADER | 12.0/35 Revenue 11.9% · PAT -34.1% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 17.4/25 ROCE 25.7% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 39.4× · PEG 1.43 65% evidence | 13.2/20 RS sector -1.9% · RS bench 20% · 1Y 18.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12 + 17.4 + 11 + 13.2 = 53.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 20%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 15Zydus Lifesciences LtdZYDUSLIFE | 52.9/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 12.0/35 Revenue 21.1% · PAT -2.5% · OPM change -8 pp 100% evidence | 16.5/25 ROCE 21.1% · OPM 24% 100% evidence | 14.5/20 P/E 23.3× · PEG 1.23 100% evidence | 9.9/20 RS sector -7.2% · RS bench 13.4% · 1Y 21.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12 + 16.5 + 14.5 + 9.9 = 52.9 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 16Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals LtdAKUMS | 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | LEADER | 13.5/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT -15.8% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE 14.9% · OPM 15% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 37.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.2/20 RS sector 15.8% · RS bench 40.3% · 1Y 51.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.5 + 10.9 + 9.7 + 18.2 = 52.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 40.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 17ERIS Lifesciences LtdERIS | 52.0/100Mixed-positive evidence76% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.7/35 Revenue 9.6% · PAT 62.2% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 14.1% · OPM 34% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 28.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.8/20 RS sector -13.9% · RS bench -9.8% · 1Y -21.3%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.7 + 14.3 + 11.2 + 5.8 = 52 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18Suven Life Sciences LtdSUVEN | 51.2/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence | LEADER | 19.9/35 Revenue 25% · PAT -80% · OPM change -997 pp 74% evidence | 2.1/25 ROCE -79.5% · OPM — 84% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 19.2/20 RS sector 33.1% · RS bench 60% · 1Y 36.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.9 + 2.1 + 10 + 19.2 = 51.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19J B Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals LtdJBCHEPHARM | 48.2/100Mixed-negative evidence96% evidence | 10.8/35 Revenue 5.9% · PAT 7.4% · OPM change -2 pp 88% evidence | 20.6/25 ROCE 25.4% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 4.1/20 P/E 53.8× · PEG 2.34 100% evidence | 12.7/20 RS sector 1% · RS bench 23.5% · 1Y 42.5%4 of 8 weeks ahead to 2026-07-19 100% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 10.8 + 20.6 + 4.1 + 12.7 = 48.2 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 20Fredun Pharmaceuticals Ltd539730 | 47.7/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0 pp 24% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 21.3% · OPM 14% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 58.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.5/20 RS sector -19% · RS bench 133.6% · 1Y 46.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.2 + 14.9 + 9.1 + 6.5 = 47.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21Kilitch Drugs (India) LtdKILITCH | 47.4/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.1/35 Revenue 14% · PAT 9.3% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE 13.4% · OPM 6.5% 95% evidence | 14.1/20 P/E 21.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 10.3/20 RS sector -15.6% · RS bench 3.6% · 1Y -19%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.1 + 8.9 + 14.1 + 10.3 = 47.4 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 22Lincoln Pharmaceuticals LtdLINCOLN | 46.7/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.2/35 Revenue 10% · PAT 11.5% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 15.1/25 ROCE 16.3% · OPM 15% 95% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 12.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.3/20 RS sector -13.5% · RS bench 5.6% · 1Y 9.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.2 + 15.1 + 10.1 + 6.3 = 46.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Alkem Laboratories LtdALKEM | 46.7/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.9/35 Revenue 13.4% · PAT -5.5% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence | 17.4/25 ROCE 21.2% · OPM 20% 76% evidence | 11.9/20 P/E 28.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 2.5/20 RS sector -22.4% · RS bench -4.6% · 1Y 12.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.9 + 17.4 + 11.9 + 2.5 = 46.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Sun Pharmaceutical Industries LtdSUNPHARMA | 46.1/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 17.3/35 Revenue 11.4% · PAT 16.5% · OPM change -2 pp 100% evidence | 17.1/25 ROCE 20.5% · OPM 29% 100% evidence | 4.1/20 P/E 36.7× · PEG 3.8 100% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -12.1% · RS bench 7.7% · 1Y 21.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 17.1 + 4.1 + 7.6 = 46.1 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 25Aurobindo Pharma LtdAUROPHARMA | 44.8/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 16.8/35 Revenue 9.1% · PAT 9.5% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 12.2/25 ROCE 12.9% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 4.4/20 P/E 24.9× · PEG 2.67 100% evidence | 11.4/20 RS sector 1.1% · RS bench 22.8% · 1Y 55.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 12.2 + 4.4 + 11.4 = 44.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26Strides Pharma Science LtdSTAR | 44.1/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence | FADING | 16.1/35 Revenue 8.1% · PAT 79.1% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 12.9/25 ROCE 18.3% · OPM 18% 95% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 15.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.8/20 RS sector -18.3% · RS bench -0.4% · 1Y 20.3%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.1 + 12.9 + 11.3 + 3.8 = 44.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 27Amrutanjan Health Care LtdAMRUTANJAN | 44.0/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.5/35 Revenue 10.7% · PAT -1.1% · OPM change -2.9 pp 95% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 24.8% · OPM 6.1% 95% evidence | 14.3/20 P/E 23× · PEG — 50% evidence | 1.4/20 RS sector -36.4% · RS bench -21% · 1Y -24.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.5 + 14.8 + 14.3 + 1.4 = 44 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 28Gufic BioSciences LtdGUFICBIO | 43.8/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.5/35 Revenue 16.6% · PAT 17.7% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 12.3% · OPM 18% 100% evidence | 2.2/20 P/E 57.6× · PEG 4.78 100% evidence | 8.5/20 RS sector -18.5% · RS bench 23% · 1Y 16.9%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.5 + 9.6 + 2.2 + 8.5 = 43.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 29Alembic Pharmaceuticals LtdAPLLTD | 42.7/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.8/35 Revenue 14.1% · PAT 14.6% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 8.2/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 12.5/20 P/E 21.9× · PEG 1.74 100% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -24.1% · RS bench -0.6% · 1Y -11.2%1 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 8.2 + 12.5 + 5.2 = 42.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 30FDC LtdFDC | 42.0/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.1/35 Revenue 3.5% · PAT 8.2% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 13.5/25 ROCE 16.7% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 11.9/20 P/E 18.7× · PEG 1.98 100% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -25.2% · RS bench -13.4% · 1Y -25.4%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.1 + 13.5 + 11.9 + 3.5 = 42 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 31Mankind Pharma LtdMANKIND | 41.8/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.0/35 Revenue 14.2% · PAT 8% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 13.7/25 ROCE 13.5% · OPM 26% 100% evidence | 5.4/20 P/E 47× · PEG 2.81 100% evidence | 5.7/20 RS sector -16.3% · RS bench 2.7% · 1Y -1.7%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 13.7 + 5.4 + 5.7 = 41.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 32Torrent Pharmaceuticals LtdTORNTPHARM | 40.4/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.8/35 Revenue 32.9% · PAT 7.7% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 15.2% · OPM 34% 100% evidence | 0.8/20 P/E 82.4× · PEG 5.11 100% evidence | 8.7/20 RS sector -5.3% · RS bench 15.4% · 1Y 35.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 14.1 + 0.8 + 8.7 = 40.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 33Bafna Pharmaceuticals LtdBAFNAPH | 40.2/100Mixed-negative evidence60% evidence | 11.6/35 Revenue -3.1% · PAT -5.8% · OPM change -11.3 pp 95% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE 11.9% · OPM 3.4% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 78.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 66.4% · 1Y — 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 11.6 + 7.3 + 9 + 12.3 = 40.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 34Zim Laboratories LtdZIMLAB | 39.4/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence | LEADER | 9.6/35 Revenue 7.5% · PAT -60.6% · OPM change -3.3 pp 71% evidence | 6.1/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 2.6% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 156× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.2/20 RS sector 6.1% · RS bench 27.8% · 1Y 41.7%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.6 + 6.1 + 8.5 + 15.2 = 39.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 27.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 35Indoco Remedies LtdINDOCO | 38.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.4/35 Revenue 11.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5 pp 71% evidence | 4.4/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -32.2% · RS bench -8.6% · 1Y -24.8%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.4 + 4.4 + 10 + 3.5 = 38.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 36Natco Pharma LtdNATCOPHARM | 37.6/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 3.0/35 Revenue -20.8% · PAT -32.5% · OPM change -18 pp 100% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 17.1% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 19.0/20 P/E 14.1× · PEG 0.76 100% evidence | 1.8/20 RS sector -22.1% · RS bench -4.6% · 1Y -0.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 3 + 13.8 + 19 + 1.8 = 37.6 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 37Biocon LtdBIOCON | 37.5/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 13.6/35 Revenue 9.8% · PAT -36.4% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 3.6% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 93.4× · PEG 0.82 100% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -13.7% · RS bench 5.6% · 1Y 21.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.6 + 7.7 + 10 + 6.2 = 37.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 38Bajaj Healthcare LtdBAJAJHCARE | 37.2/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | TURNING | 9.9/35 Revenue 12.3% · PAT -59.1% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 10.4/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 17% 95% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 19.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.9/20 RS sector -30.3% · RS bench -13.3% · 1Y -26.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.9 + 10.4 + 11 + 5.9 = 37.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 39Bharat Parenterals Ltd541096 | 33.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 12.5/35 Revenue -11.2% · PAT 16% · OPM change -2.8 pp 71% evidence | 4.1/25 ROCE -1.8% · OPM 9.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 7.3/20 RS sector -20.9% · RS bench 7.8% · 1Y -2.7%10 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.5 + 4.1 + 10 + 7.3 = 33.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 40Cipla LtdCIPLA | 33.0/100Adverse evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 4.7/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT -37.7% · OPM change -9 pp 100% evidence | 11.9/25 ROCE 15.5% · OPM 17% 100% evidence | 11.7/20 P/E 32.7× · PEG 1.25 100% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -19.3% · RS bench -0.5% · 1Y -2.4%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.7 + 11.9 + 11.7 + 4.7 = 33 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 41Dr Reddys Laboratories LtdDRREDDY | 30.4/100Adverse evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 3.8/35 Revenue -0.9% · PAT -44.6% · OPM change -14 pp 100% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 13% · OPM 11% 100% evidence | 13.5/20 P/E 31.1× · PEG 1.15 100% evidence | 1.4/20 RS sector -24.2% · RS bench -6.8% · 1Y -0.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 3.8 + 11.7 + 13.5 + 1.4 = 30.4 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 42Influx Healthtech LtdINFLUX | 63.6/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | FADING | 19.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 26% evidence | 20.8/25 ROCE 40% · OPM 19% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 32.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.5/20 RS sector 1.4% · RS bench 23.1% · 1Y 98.2%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.3 + 20.8 + 10 + 13.5 = 63.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 43Syncom Healthcare LtdSYNCOM | 50.0/100Thin evidence · provisional31% evidence | 17.1/35 Revenue -69.4% · PAT 63.5% · OPM change — 16% evidence | 6.9/25 ROCE -20.2% · OPM -225.7% 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 16.0/20 RS sector 29.1% · RS bench 45.7% · 1Y —9 of 12 weeks ahead to 2021-06-30 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 6.9 + 10 + 16 = 50 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 44Sai Parenterals LtdSAIPARENT | 37.2/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 32% evidence | 4.9/25 ROCE 6% · OPM 13.2% 95% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 117× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —5 of 5 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.7 + 4.9 + 8.6 + 10 = 37.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's share price today?
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd trades at ₹1,932, +32.8% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹36,652 Cr. The stock sits at 93% of its 52-week range of ₹1,319–₹1,978, +17.7% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 58 weeks in. — as of 14 August 2026.
What were Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd reported revenue of ₹2,580 Cr and net profit of ₹292 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 22.8% and profit rose 35.8% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹15.50. The operating margin was 21.0%, 1.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's revenue?
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd reported revenue of ₹2,580 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +22.8% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹9,204 Cr (+16.6%). Over the last 7 years revenue compounded at 10.0% a year. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's profit?
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd earned ₹292 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +35.8% year on year — the 9th straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹941 Cr. The operating margin ran 21.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's market cap?
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹36,652 Cr at a share price of ₹1,932. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's P/E ratio?
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd trades at a P/E of 35.6×, at the 55th percentile of its own 2-year range, against a long-run median of 35.2×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd pay a dividend?
Yes — Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's dividend payout was 7% of profit in FY26, and it recorded a payout in each of its last 8 reported fiscal years. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd looks mid-range: its P/E of 35.6× sits at the 55th percentile of its 2-year range (long-run median 35.2×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd growing?
Yes — Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +22.8% year on year, profit +35.8%, and the margin +1.0 pp at 21.0%. The 7-year compound rates are 10.0% (revenue) and 24.0% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 14 August 2026.
How is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd performing?
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 58 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 22.8% and profit rose 35.8% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 13 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 14 August 2026.
What stage is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd in?
Consistent — revenue and profit growth have stayed positive through the window, with ROCE at 24.0% and holding. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +22.8% latest, profit growth +35.8% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 58 of stage 2), trading +17.7% versus its 200-day average and at 93% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 13 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 2.1 years the stock moved +42% against the NIFTY 500's +2% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 14 August 2026.
Will Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹1,932, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 58 weeks in. Its P/E of 35.6× sits at the 55th percentile of its own 2-year range. — as of 14 August 2026.
Who owns Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd?
Promoters hold 77.8% of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd, foreign institutions 4.9%, domestic institutions 8.5% and the public 8.8% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions added 4.5 points over 7 quarters. — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.31, and operating profit covers the interest bill 13×. FY26 borrowings were ₹1,558 Cr against equity of ₹4,950 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's capex?
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd spent ₹2,145 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹633 Cr, with ₹172 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's cash flow?
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd generated ₹944 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹311 Cr of free cash flow after ₹633 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹941 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 133% of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. Though the latest year ran at 100% — the trend is the thing to watch. In FY26, operating cash was ₹944 Cr against reported profit of ₹941 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 14 August 2026.
Where is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd in its business cycle?
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 20.0%, against a 8-year band of 14.0%–24.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 21.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 14 August 2026.
What could break the Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd story?
Biggest watch item: the price is already 58 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +35.6% in a year against a +32.8% price move. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 14 August 2026.