Syncom Healthcare Ltd
SYNCOMSyncom Healthcare Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: Promoters moved −24.9 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (28 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read improving, and 760% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Syncom Healthcare Ltd trades at ₹4.2, in a confirmed uptrend and 28 weeks into that stage. That is +51.6% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 73% of a 52-week range of ₹1 to ₹5. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 8 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 28 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹4.2 it trades +51.6% versus its 200-day average and sits at 73% of its 52-week range (₹1–₹5).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 5.2 years the stock moved −38% while the NIFTY 500 moved +114% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 8 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
P/E does not price Syncom Healthcare Ltd — earnings are negative, so there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where a turn, when it comes, would show first. On sales the market values Syncom Healthcare Ltd at 5.6× its FY23 revenue of ₹3.0 Cr.
With earnings negative, P/E does not price — there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where the turn, when it comes, will show first.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Syncom Healthcare Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 9 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
The latest quarter’s profit carries a one-off item larger than the operating base, so the profit curve is shown but does not vote in the stage call.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +172.1% | −46.7% | −40.8% | −29.1% |
| Share price | +50.0% | −1.5% | −13.0% | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
50.1/100 — rank 43 of 44 in Pharma - Formulators · 31% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers
Syncom Healthcare Ltd scores 50.1 out of 100 against the 44 companies it is compared with in Pharma - Formulators, ranking 43. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 17.1 + 6.9 + 10 + 16.1 = 50.1. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Syncom Healthcare Ltd reported ₹0.3 Cr of revenue in the Jun 21 quarter, +9.4% year on year. That is the 2nd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at −29.1% a year. The last full year, FY23, came in at ₹3.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1.9 Cr.
FY23 revenue came in at ₹3.0 Cr (+172.1% on the year), capping 10 years at −29.1% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 21) printed ₹0.3 Cr, +9.4% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +17.3% growth against the decade's −29.1% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −69.4% over the last 4 quarters against −82.2%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Syncom Healthcare Ltd's operating margin is −225.7% in the Jun 21 quarter, +86.8 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −179.8% to 4.0%. The current quarter is running below every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is −225.7%, +86.8 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −179.8%–4.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +86.8 pp year on year while gross margin went +124.7 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Syncom Healthcare Ltd posted a net loss of ₹1.1 Cr in the Jun 21 quarter. That quarter carries a one-off item larger than its own revenue, so the year-on-year figure is an artefact rather than a trading result. The full FY23 year was a loss of ₹5.4 Cr. That loss is 317.1% of the quarter's revenue.
Jun 21 profit was ₹−1.1 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY23 printed ₹−5.4 Cr (null).
🚨 Read this profit with care: at ₹−1.1 Cr it is larger than the whole quarter's revenue of ₹0.3 Cr — no operating business earns more than it sells, so this is a one-off item (a debt-to-equity conversion, a tax write-back or an asset sale), not money the business earned. The underlying operations are running at −225.7% operating margin; the year-on-year jump and any P/E built on this number are artefacts of the one-off, not a real earnings turn.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 2 fiscal years 760% of Syncom Healthcare Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY23 that was ₹−2.1 Cr of operating cash against ₹−5.4 Cr of profit. After ₹2.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−4.0 Cr was left as free cash.
FY23: operating cash of ₹−2.1 Cr against reported profit of ₹−5.4 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−4.0 Cr after ₹2.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 2 fiscal years the conversion rate is 760% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 760%: the cash cycle held roughly steady between FY18 and FY23 — so conversion tracks profitability rather than the cycle.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Syncom Healthcare Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs −23 days in FY23, up from −30 days in FY18. Capital spending ran ₹7.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY23 sales of ₹3.0 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.0 Cr, so roughly ₹0.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY23: debtors at 204 days, inventory at 252 days — roughly 8.3 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of −23 days, looser than FY18's −30.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 252 days to sell; customers pay about 204 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 479 days — netting out to the −23-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY23 sales of ₹3.0 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.0 Cr — so the −23-day loop keeps roughly ₹0.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹7.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹5.0 Cr of depreciation — building somewhat ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY23) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Syncom Healthcare Ltd earns a ROCE of −20% in FY23. That is up from a trough of −54% in FY21. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is −178.5% net margin on 0.11× asset turns.
FY23 ROCE is −20%, recovered from a FY21 trough of −54% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY23): −178.5% net margin × 0.11× asset turns × 7.85× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −154.1% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Syncom Healthcare Ltd carries ₹19.2 Cr of borrowings against ₹3.5 Cr of equity in FY23, a debt-to-equity of 5.41. Operating profit covers the interest bill −2×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹24.9 Cr to ₹19.2 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹7.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY23: borrowings of ₹19.2 Cr against equity of ₹3.5 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 5.41. Operating profit covers the interest bill −2×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹24.9 Cr to ₹19.2 Cr while capital spending ran ₹7.0 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Promoters cut 24.9 points of Syncom Healthcare Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 0.1% of the company. Domestic institutions moved +0.0 points over the same window, to 0.0%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Promoters: −24.9 points over 8 quarters to 0.1%; Domestic institutions: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 0.0%. Note the structure: promoters hold under 20% — this is a widely-held company where institutions, not a family, set the direction.
🚨 Why the register moved: promoters drove it (−24.9 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Syncom Healthcare Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Kwality Pharmaceuticals LtdKPL | 75.7/100Favorable setup94% evidence | 31.7/35 Revenue 37.9% · PAT 88.4% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 15.9/25 ROCE 24.1% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 45× · PEG 0.54 100% evidence | 16.8/20 RS sector 41.5% · RS bench 98.1% · 1Y 111.3%2 of 2 weeks ahead to 2026-06-07 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 31.7 + 15.9 + 11.3 + 16.8 = 75.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Bliss GVS Pharma LtdBLISSGVS | 70.3/100Favorable setup82% evidence | LEADER | 29.1/35 Revenue 20.6% · PAT 25.7% · OPM change 7 pp 95% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 16.9% · OPM 27% 76% evidence | 6.6/20 P/E 40.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 19.8/20 RS sector 70.9% · RS bench 97.8% · 1Y 192.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.1 + 14.8 + 6.6 + 19.8 = 70.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Lupin LtdLUPIN | 69.2/100Favorable setup93% evidence | ASLEEP | 29.6/35 Revenue 28.2% · PAT 49.2% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 19.2/25 ROCE 29.9% · OPM 30% 100% evidence | 16.2/20 P/E 17.2× · PEG 0.54 65% evidence | 4.2/20 RS sector -17.4% · RS bench -0.2% · 1Y 16.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.6 + 19.2 + 16.2 + 4.2 = 69.2 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -17.4% and the one-year return is 16.5%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 4Fredun Pharmaceuticals LtdFREDUN | 68.8/100Favorable setup76% evidence | 26.8/35 Revenue 91.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 15.2/25 ROCE 21.3% · OPM 14% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 55× · PEG — 50% evidence | 15.6/20 RS sector 24.1% · RS bench 30.6% · 1Y 44.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 26.8 + 15.2 + 11.2 + 15.6 = 68.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Glenmark Pharmaceuticals LtdGLENMARK | 68.6/100Favorable setup100% evidence | ASLEEP | 30.8/35 Revenue 32.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 18.1/25 ROCE 39.8% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 12.7/20 P/E 21× · PEG 1.43 100% evidence | 7.0/20 RS sector -10.2% · RS bench 8.5% · 1Y 14.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 30.8 + 18.1 + 12.7 + 7 = 68.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Emcure Pharmaceuticals LtdEMCURE | 66.5/100Favorable setup75% evidence | LEADER | 26.6/35 Revenue 18.4% · PAT 32.2% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 18.2/25 ROCE 24% · OPM 21% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 35.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.8/20 RS sector 1.2% · RS bench 21.7% · 1Y 39.4%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.6 + 18.2 + 9.9 + 11.8 = 66.5 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 7Corona Remedies LtdCORONA | 65.1/100Favorable setup73% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.1/35 Revenue 18% · PAT 19.3% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 20.3/25 ROCE 33.3% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 11.7/20 P/E 61.6× · PEG 1.18 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —9 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.1 + 20.3 + 11.7 + 10 = 65.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Rubicon Research LtdRUBICON | 62.4/100Mixed-positive evidence73% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.1/35 Revenue 46.8% · PAT 91.4% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 21.8/25 ROCE 28.4% · OPM 24% 100% evidence | 6.5/20 P/E 93× · PEG 2.33 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —12 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.1 + 21.8 + 6.5 + 10 = 62.4 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 9Accent Microcell LtdACCENTMIC | 62.1/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | LEADER | 17.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 26% evidence | 17.9/25 ROCE 24.9% · OPM 16% 95% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 31.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 17.4/20 RS sector 28.8% · RS bench 53.2% · 1Y 94.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 17.9 + 9.2 + 17.4 = 62.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Ajanta Pharma LtdAJANTPHARM | 61.9/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.4/35 Revenue 20.2% · PAT 22.2% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 19.5/25 ROCE 34.5% · OPM 26% 100% evidence | 5.5/20 P/E 40.4× · PEG 2.31 100% evidence | 15.5/20 RS sector 4.8% · RS bench 26.1% · 1Y 41%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 19.5 + 5.5 + 15.5 = 61.9 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 11Ipca Laboratories LtdIPCALAB | 61.6/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | FADING | 26.4/35 Revenue 10.6% · PAT 68% · OPM change 6 pp 95% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 17% · OPM 24% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 32× · PEG — 50% evidence | 8.4/20 RS sector -6.5% · RS bench 12.7% · 1Y 25.1%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.4 + 15.8 + 11 + 8.4 = 61.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Caplin Point Laboratories LtdCAPLIPOINT | 60.7/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 19.1/35 Revenue 15% · PAT 19.6% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 17.6/25 ROCE 24.6% · OPM 35% 100% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 28.3× · PEG 1.52 100% evidence | 14.4/20 RS sector 0.4% · RS bench 20.9% · 1Y 17.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.1 + 17.6 + 9.6 + 14.4 = 60.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Marksans Pharma LtdMARKSANS | 57.2/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 26.0/35 Revenue 19.6% · PAT 48% · OPM change 9 pp 100% evidence | 15.7/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 6.2/20 P/E 29.2× · PEG 2.85 65% evidence | 9.3/20 RS sector -18.1% · RS bench 64.2% · 1Y 57.9%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26 + 15.7 + 6.2 + 9.3 = 57.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Wockhardt LtdWOCKPHARMA | 56.1/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | LEADER | 25.0/35 Revenue 18.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 11 pp 74% evidence | 5.2/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 78.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 4.7% · RS bench 25.4% · 1Y 31.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25 + 5.2 + 8.9 + 17 = 56.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15RPG Life Sciences LtdRPGLIFE | 53.6/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence | LEADER | 11.9/35 Revenue 11.9% · PAT -34.1% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 17.4/25 ROCE 25.7% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 39.4× · PEG 1.43 65% evidence | 13.5/20 RS sector -0.7% · RS bench 20% · 1Y 18.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.9 + 17.4 + 10.8 + 13.5 = 53.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 20%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 16Zydus Lifesciences LtdZYDUSLIFE | 52.6/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 11.9/35 Revenue 21.1% · PAT -2.5% · OPM change -8 pp 100% evidence | 16.6/25 ROCE 21.1% · OPM 24% 100% evidence | 14.2/20 P/E 23.3× · PEG 1.23 100% evidence | 9.9/20 RS sector -6% · RS bench 13.4% · 1Y 21.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.9 + 16.6 + 14.2 + 9.9 = 52.6 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 17Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals LtdAKUMS | 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | LEADER | 13.4/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT -15.8% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE 14.9% · OPM 15% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 37.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.3/20 RS sector 17.2% · RS bench 40.3% · 1Y 51.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.4 + 10.9 + 9.7 + 18.3 = 52.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 40.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 18ERIS Lifesciences LtdERIS | 51.4/100Mixed-positive evidence76% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.5/35 Revenue 9.6% · PAT 62.2% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 14.1% · OPM 34% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 28.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.5/20 RS sector -13.8% · RS bench -9.8% · 1Y -21.3%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 14.3 + 11.1 + 5.5 = 51.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Suven Life Sciences LtdSUVEN | 51.3/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence | LEADER | 19.8/35 Revenue 25% · PAT -80% · OPM change -997 pp 74% evidence | 2.1/25 ROCE -79.5% · OPM — 84% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 19.4/20 RS sector 34.8% · RS bench 60% · 1Y 36.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 2.1 + 10 + 19.4 = 51.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Kilitch Drugs (India) LtdKILITCH | 47.2/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.9/35 Revenue 14% · PAT 9.3% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 9.0/25 ROCE 13.4% · OPM 6.5% 95% evidence | 14.1/20 P/E 21.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 10.2/20 RS sector -14.6% · RS bench 3.6% · 1Y -19%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.9 + 9 + 14.1 + 10.2 = 47.2 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 21J B Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals LtdJBCHEPHARM | 46.8/100Mixed-negative evidence96% evidence | 10.6/35 Revenue 5.9% · PAT 7.4% · OPM change -2 pp 88% evidence | 20.6/25 ROCE 25.4% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 3.8/20 P/E 53.8× · PEG 2.34 100% evidence | 11.8/20 RS sector 0.3% · RS bench 23.5% · 1Y 42.5%4 of 8 weeks ahead to 2026-07-19 100% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 10.6 + 20.6 + 3.8 + 11.8 = 46.8 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 22Lincoln Pharmaceuticals LtdLINCOLN | 46.4/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.1/35 Revenue 10% · PAT 11.5% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 15.1/25 ROCE 16.3% · OPM 15% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 12.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -12.4% · RS bench 5.6% · 1Y 9.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 15.1 + 10 + 6.2 = 46.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Alkem Laboratories LtdALKEM | 46.4/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.7/35 Revenue 13.4% · PAT -5.5% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence | 17.4/25 ROCE 21.2% · OPM 20% 76% evidence | 11.8/20 P/E 28.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 2.5/20 RS sector -21.5% · RS bench -4.6% · 1Y 12.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.7 + 17.4 + 11.8 + 2.5 = 46.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Sun Pharmaceutical Industries LtdSUNPHARMA | 45.6/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 17.0/35 Revenue 11.4% · PAT 16.5% · OPM change -2 pp 100% evidence | 17.1/25 ROCE 20.5% · OPM 29% 100% evidence | 4.0/20 P/E 36.7× · PEG 3.8 100% evidence | 7.5/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench 7.7% · 1Y 21.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 17.1 + 4 + 7.5 = 45.6 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 25Aurobindo Pharma LtdAUROPHARMA | 44.8/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 16.6/35 Revenue 9.1% · PAT 9.5% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 12.9% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 4.3/20 P/E 24.9× · PEG 2.67 100% evidence | 11.6/20 RS sector 2.4% · RS bench 22.8% · 1Y 55.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 12.3 + 4.3 + 11.6 = 44.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26Amrutanjan Health Care LtdAMRUTANJAN | 43.8/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.3/35 Revenue 10.7% · PAT -1.1% · OPM change -2.9 pp 95% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 24.8% · OPM 6.1% 95% evidence | 14.3/20 P/E 23× · PEG — 50% evidence | 1.4/20 RS sector -35.6% · RS bench -21% · 1Y -24.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.3 + 14.8 + 14.3 + 1.4 = 43.8 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 27Strides Pharma Science LtdSTAR | 43.5/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence | FADING | 15.7/35 Revenue 8.1% · PAT 79.1% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 12.9/25 ROCE 18.3% · OPM 18% 95% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 15.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.6/20 RS sector -17.3% · RS bench -0.4% · 1Y 20.3%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.7 + 12.9 + 11.3 + 3.6 = 43.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28Gufic BioSciences LtdGUFICBIO | 43.0/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.2/35 Revenue 16.6% · PAT 17.7% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 12.3% · OPM 18% 100% evidence | 2.1/20 P/E 57.6× · PEG 4.78 100% evidence | 8.1/20 RS sector -18.4% · RS bench 23% · 1Y 16.9%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.2 + 9.6 + 2.1 + 8.1 = 43 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 29Alembic Pharmaceuticals LtdAPLLTD | 42.3/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.6/35 Revenue 14.1% · PAT 14.6% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 21.9× · PEG 1.74 100% evidence | 5.1/20 RS sector -24.1% · RS bench -0.6% · 1Y -11.2%1 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 8.3 + 12.3 + 5.1 = 42.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 30FDC LtdFDC | 41.7/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.9/35 Revenue 3.5% · PAT 8.2% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 13.6/25 ROCE 16.7% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 11.7/20 P/E 18.7× · PEG 1.98 100% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -25.2% · RS bench -13.4% · 1Y -25.4%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.9 + 13.6 + 11.7 + 3.5 = 41.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 31Mankind Pharma LtdMANKIND | 41.3/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.8/35 Revenue 14.2% · PAT 8% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 13.7/25 ROCE 13.5% · OPM 26% 100% evidence | 5.3/20 P/E 47× · PEG 2.81 100% evidence | 5.5/20 RS sector -15.3% · RS bench 2.7% · 1Y -1.7%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 13.7 + 5.3 + 5.5 = 41.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 32Torrent Pharmaceuticals LtdTORNTPHARM | 40.3/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.6/35 Revenue 32.9% · PAT 7.7% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 15.2% · OPM 34% 100% evidence | 0.8/20 P/E 82.4× · PEG 5.11 100% evidence | 8.8/20 RS sector -4.1% · RS bench 15.4% · 1Y 35.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 14.1 + 0.8 + 8.8 = 40.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 33Bafna Pharmaceuticals LtdBAFNAPH | 40.2/100Mixed-negative evidence60% evidence | 11.6/35 Revenue -3.1% · PAT -5.8% · OPM change -11.3 pp 95% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE 11.9% · OPM 3.4% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 78.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 66.4% · 1Y — 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 11.6 + 7.3 + 9 + 12.3 = 40.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 34Zim Laboratories LtdZIMLAB | 39.4/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence | LEADER | 9.6/35 Revenue 7.5% · PAT -60.6% · OPM change -3.3 pp 71% evidence | 6.1/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 2.6% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 156× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.2/20 RS sector 7.4% · RS bench 27.8% · 1Y 41.7%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.6 + 6.1 + 8.5 + 15.2 = 39.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 27.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 35Indoco Remedies LtdINDOCO | 38.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.3/35 Revenue 11.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5 pp 71% evidence | 4.4/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -32.2% · RS bench -8.6% · 1Y -24.8%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.3 + 4.4 + 10 + 3.5 = 38.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 36Natco Pharma LtdNATCOPHARM | 37.4/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 2.9/35 Revenue -20.8% · PAT -32.5% · OPM change -18 pp 100% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 17.1% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 18.9/20 P/E 14.1× · PEG 0.76 100% evidence | 1.8/20 RS sector -21.1% · RS bench -4.6% · 1Y -0.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 2.9 + 13.8 + 18.9 + 1.8 = 37.4 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 37Bajaj Healthcare LtdBAJAJHCARE | 37.2/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | TURNING | 9.9/35 Revenue 12.3% · PAT -59.1% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 10.4/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 17% 95% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 19.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.0/20 RS sector -29.4% · RS bench -13.3% · 1Y -26.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.9 + 10.4 + 10.9 + 6 = 37.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 38Biocon LtdBIOCON | 37.0/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 13.4/35 Revenue 9.8% · PAT -36.4% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 3.6% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 93.4× · PEG 0.82 100% evidence | 6.1/20 RS sector -12.6% · RS bench 5.6% · 1Y 21.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.4 + 7.7 + 9.8 + 6.1 = 37 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 39Cipla LtdCIPLA | 32.8/100Adverse evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 4.6/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT -37.7% · OPM change -9 pp 100% evidence | 12.0/25 ROCE 15.5% · OPM 17% 100% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 32.7× · PEG 1.25 100% evidence | 4.8/20 RS sector -18.3% · RS bench -0.5% · 1Y -2.4%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.6 + 12 + 11.4 + 4.8 = 32.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 40Bharat Parenterals LtdBPLPHARMA | 32.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | 12.4/35 Revenue -11.2% · PAT 16% · OPM change -2.8 pp 71% evidence | 4.1/25 ROCE -1.8% · OPM 9.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.8/20 RS sector -12.8% · RS bench -8.3% · 1Y -23.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 12.4 + 4.1 + 10 + 5.8 = 32.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 41Dr Reddys Laboratories LtdDRREDDY | 30.2/100Adverse evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 3.7/35 Revenue -0.9% · PAT -44.6% · OPM change -14 pp 100% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 13% · OPM 11% 100% evidence | 13.3/20 P/E 31.1× · PEG 1.15 100% evidence | 1.5/20 RS sector -23.3% · RS bench -6.8% · 1Y -0.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 3.7 + 11.7 + 13.3 + 1.5 = 30.2 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 42Influx Healthtech LtdINFLUX | 63.9/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | FADING | 19.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 26% evidence | 20.8/25 ROCE 40% · OPM 19% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 32.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.7/20 RS sector 2.7% · RS bench 23.1% · 1Y 98.2%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.4 + 20.8 + 10 + 13.7 = 63.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 43Syncom Healthcare Ltdthis pageSYNCOM | 50.1/100Thin evidence · provisional31% evidence | 17.1/35 Revenue -69.4% · PAT 63.5% · OPM change — 16% evidence | 6.9/25 ROCE -20.2% · OPM -225.7% 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 16.1/20 RS sector 29.1% · RS bench 45.7% · 1Y —9 of 12 weeks ahead to 2021-06-30 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 6.9 + 10 + 16.1 = 50.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 44Sai Parenterals LtdSAIPARENT | 37.3/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 32% evidence | 5.0/25 ROCE 6% · OPM 13.2% 95% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 117× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —5 of 5 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.7 + 5 + 8.6 + 10 = 37.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Syncom Healthcare Ltd's share price today?
Syncom Healthcare Ltd trades at ₹4.2, +50.0% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹16.8 Cr. The stock sits at 73% of its 52-week range of ₹1–₹5, +51.6% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 28 weeks in. — as of 14 August 2026.
What were Syncom Healthcare Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Syncom Healthcare Ltd reported revenue of ₹0.3 Cr and a net loss of ₹1.1 Cr for the Jun 21 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹−0.28. The operating margin was −225.7%, 86.8 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Syncom Healthcare Ltd's revenue?
Syncom Healthcare Ltd reported revenue of ₹0.3 Cr in the Jun 21 quarter, +9.4% year on year. For the full FY23 fiscal year, revenue was ₹3.0 Cr (+172.1%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at −29.1% a year. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Syncom Healthcare Ltd's profit?
Syncom Healthcare Ltd earned ₹−1.1 Cr of net profit in the Jun 21 quarter. Full-year FY23 profit was ₹−5.4 Cr. The operating margin ran −225.7% in the latest quarter. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Syncom Healthcare Ltd's market cap?
Syncom Healthcare Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹16.8 Cr at a share price of ₹4.2. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Syncom Healthcare Ltd pay a dividend?
No — Syncom Healthcare Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 12 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 14 August 2026.
How is Syncom Healthcare Ltd performing?
Syncom Healthcare Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 28 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 8 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Syncom Healthcare Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 28 of stage 2), trading +51.6% versus its 200-day average and at 73% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Syncom Healthcare Ltd beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Syncom Healthcare Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 8 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 5.2 years the stock moved −38% against the NIFTY 500's +114% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 14 August 2026.
Will Syncom Healthcare Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Syncom Healthcare Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹4.2, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 28 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 14 August 2026.
Who owns Syncom Healthcare Ltd?
Promoters hold 0.1% of Syncom Healthcare Ltd, foreign institutions null%, domestic institutions 0.0% and the public 99.9% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Promoters cut 24.9 points over 8 quarters. — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Syncom Healthcare Ltd have too much debt?
It carries real leverage — Syncom Healthcare Ltd's debt-to-equity is 5.41, and operating profit covers the interest bill −2×. FY23 borrowings were ₹19.2 Cr against equity of ₹3.5 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Syncom Healthcare Ltd's capex?
Syncom Healthcare Ltd spent ₹7.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY23 alone that was ₹2.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Syncom Healthcare Ltd's cash flow?
Syncom Healthcare Ltd consumed ₹2.1 Cr of operating cash in FY23 — cash flowed out rather than in (free cash flow: ₹−4.0 Cr). Reported profit that year was ₹−5.4 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Syncom Healthcare Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 2 fiscal years, 760% of Syncom Healthcare Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. Though the latest year ran at 39% — the trend is the thing to watch. In FY23, operating cash was ₹−2.1 Cr against reported profit of ₹−5.4 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 14 August 2026.
Where is Syncom Healthcare Ltd in its business cycle?
Syncom Healthcare Ltd's FY23 operating margin was −67.2%, against a 12-year band of −179.8%–4.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran −225.7%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 14 August 2026.
What could break the Syncom Healthcare Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: Promoters moved −24.9 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Syncom Healthcare Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Syncom Healthcare Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 14 August 2026.