Sai Parenterals Ltd
SAIPARENTSai Parenterals Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
Biggest watch item: the price is already 18 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (18 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 37th percentile of its own 0-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +457.7% year on year, and 267% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Sai Parenterals Ltd trades at ₹552, in a confirmed uptrend and 18 weeks into that stage. That is +13.8% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 52% of a 52-week range of ₹480 to ₹619. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (3 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 18 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹552 it trades +13.8% versus its 200-day average and sits at 52% of its 52-week range (₹480–₹619).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 4 months the stock moved +15% while the NIFTY 500 moved +3% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (3 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Sai Parenterals Ltd trades at 117.0× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (37th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 167.3×, measured across 0.4 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 117.0× is mid-range by its own standards (37th percentile), against a long-run median of 167.3× measured over 0.4 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Sai Parenterals Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +133.7% | +57.8% | — | — |
| Profit | +0.0% | +51.8% | — | — |
| EPS | −40.5% | −19.2% | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
37.3/100 — rank 44 of 44 in Pharma - Formulators · 38% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers
Sai Parenterals Ltd scores 37.3 out of 100 against the 44 companies it is compared with in Pharma - Formulators, ranking 44. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 13.7 + 5 + 8.6 + 10 = 37.3. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Sai Parenterals Ltd reported ₹179 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +435.1% year on year. Over 3 years it has compounded at 57.8% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹381 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹506 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹381 Cr (+133.7% on the year), capping 3 years at 57.8% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹179 Cr, +435.1% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +435.1% growth against the decade's 57.8% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Sai Parenterals Ltd's operating margin is 13.2% in the Jun 26 quarter, −1.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 4 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 10.0% to 24.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 13.2%, −1.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 4 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 10.0%–24.0%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −1.0 pp year on year while gross margin went +6.0 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Sai Parenterals Ltd earned ₹7.9 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +457.7% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹14.0 Cr. The 3-year compound rate is 51.8%. That is 4.4% of the quarter's revenue.
Jun 26 profit was ₹7.9 Cr, +457.7% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹14.0 Cr (+0.0%), and the 3-year compound rate is 51.8%.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 267% of Sai Parenterals Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹93.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹14.0 Cr of profit. After ₹540 Cr of capital spending, ₹−447 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹93.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹14.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−447 Cr after ₹540 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 267% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 267%: the cash cycle stretched 34 days between FY23 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving.
Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 16.6× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Sai Parenterals Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 208 days in FY26, up from 174 days in FY23. Capital spending ran ₹564 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹381 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹1.0 Cr, so roughly ₹217 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 173 days, inventory at 259 days — roughly 8.5 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 208 days, looser than FY23's 174.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 259 days to sell; customers pay about 173 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 224 days — netting out to the 208-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹381 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹1.0 Cr — so the 208-day loop keeps roughly ₹217 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹564 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹34.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹212 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified
Sai Parenterals Ltd earns a ROCE of 6% in FY26. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −1.4 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 3.7% net margin on 0.27× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 6%.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 3.7% net margin × 0.27× asset turns × 2.90× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 2.9% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 10.6% − 12.0% = a −1.4 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Sai Parenterals Ltd carries ₹333 Cr of borrowings against ₹491 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.68. Operating profit covers the interest bill 2×. Over 3 years borrowings went from ₹69.0 Cr to ₹333 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹564 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY26: borrowings of ₹333 Cr against equity of ₹491 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.68. Operating profit covers the interest bill 2×. Over 3 years borrowings went from ₹69.0 Cr to ₹333 Cr while capital spending ran ₹564 Cr in just the last 3 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
No holder of Sai Parenterals Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — .
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Sai Parenterals Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Kwality Pharmaceuticals LtdKPL | 75.7/100Favorable setup94% evidence | 31.7/35 Revenue 37.9% · PAT 88.4% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 15.9/25 ROCE 24.1% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 45× · PEG 0.54 100% evidence | 16.8/20 RS sector 41.5% · RS bench 98.1% · 1Y 111.3%2 of 2 weeks ahead to 2026-06-07 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 31.7 + 15.9 + 11.3 + 16.8 = 75.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Bliss GVS Pharma LtdBLISSGVS | 70.3/100Favorable setup82% evidence | LEADER | 29.1/35 Revenue 20.6% · PAT 25.7% · OPM change 7 pp 95% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 16.9% · OPM 27% 76% evidence | 6.6/20 P/E 40.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 19.8/20 RS sector 70.9% · RS bench 97.8% · 1Y 192.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.1 + 14.8 + 6.6 + 19.8 = 70.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Lupin LtdLUPIN | 69.2/100Favorable setup93% evidence | ASLEEP | 29.6/35 Revenue 28.2% · PAT 49.2% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 19.2/25 ROCE 29.9% · OPM 30% 100% evidence | 16.2/20 P/E 17.2× · PEG 0.54 65% evidence | 4.2/20 RS sector -17.4% · RS bench -0.2% · 1Y 16.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.6 + 19.2 + 16.2 + 4.2 = 69.2 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -17.4% and the one-year return is 16.5%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 4Fredun Pharmaceuticals LtdFREDUN | 68.8/100Favorable setup76% evidence | 26.8/35 Revenue 91.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 15.2/25 ROCE 21.3% · OPM 14% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 55× · PEG — 50% evidence | 15.6/20 RS sector 24.1% · RS bench 30.6% · 1Y 44.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 26.8 + 15.2 + 11.2 + 15.6 = 68.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Glenmark Pharmaceuticals LtdGLENMARK | 68.6/100Favorable setup100% evidence | ASLEEP | 30.8/35 Revenue 32.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 18.1/25 ROCE 39.8% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 12.7/20 P/E 21× · PEG 1.43 100% evidence | 7.0/20 RS sector -10.2% · RS bench 8.5% · 1Y 14.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 30.8 + 18.1 + 12.7 + 7 = 68.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Emcure Pharmaceuticals LtdEMCURE | 66.5/100Favorable setup75% evidence | LEADER | 26.6/35 Revenue 18.4% · PAT 32.2% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 18.2/25 ROCE 24% · OPM 21% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 35.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.8/20 RS sector 1.2% · RS bench 21.7% · 1Y 39.4%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.6 + 18.2 + 9.9 + 11.8 = 66.5 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 7Corona Remedies LtdCORONA | 65.1/100Favorable setup73% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.1/35 Revenue 18% · PAT 19.3% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 20.3/25 ROCE 33.3% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 11.7/20 P/E 61.6× · PEG 1.18 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —9 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.1 + 20.3 + 11.7 + 10 = 65.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Rubicon Research LtdRUBICON | 62.4/100Mixed-positive evidence73% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.1/35 Revenue 46.8% · PAT 91.4% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 21.8/25 ROCE 28.4% · OPM 24% 100% evidence | 6.5/20 P/E 93× · PEG 2.33 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —12 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.1 + 21.8 + 6.5 + 10 = 62.4 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 9Accent Microcell LtdACCENTMIC | 62.1/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | LEADER | 17.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 26% evidence | 17.9/25 ROCE 24.9% · OPM 16% 95% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 31.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 17.4/20 RS sector 28.8% · RS bench 53.2% · 1Y 94.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 17.9 + 9.2 + 17.4 = 62.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Ajanta Pharma LtdAJANTPHARM | 61.9/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.4/35 Revenue 20.2% · PAT 22.2% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 19.5/25 ROCE 34.5% · OPM 26% 100% evidence | 5.5/20 P/E 40.4× · PEG 2.31 100% evidence | 15.5/20 RS sector 4.8% · RS bench 26.1% · 1Y 41%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 19.5 + 5.5 + 15.5 = 61.9 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 11Ipca Laboratories LtdIPCALAB | 61.6/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | FADING | 26.4/35 Revenue 10.6% · PAT 68% · OPM change 6 pp 95% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 17% · OPM 24% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 32× · PEG — 50% evidence | 8.4/20 RS sector -6.5% · RS bench 12.7% · 1Y 25.1%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.4 + 15.8 + 11 + 8.4 = 61.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Caplin Point Laboratories LtdCAPLIPOINT | 60.7/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 19.1/35 Revenue 15% · PAT 19.6% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 17.6/25 ROCE 24.6% · OPM 35% 100% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 28.3× · PEG 1.52 100% evidence | 14.4/20 RS sector 0.4% · RS bench 20.9% · 1Y 17.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.1 + 17.6 + 9.6 + 14.4 = 60.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Marksans Pharma LtdMARKSANS | 57.2/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 26.0/35 Revenue 19.6% · PAT 48% · OPM change 9 pp 100% evidence | 15.7/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 6.2/20 P/E 29.2× · PEG 2.85 65% evidence | 9.3/20 RS sector -18.1% · RS bench 64.2% · 1Y 57.9%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26 + 15.7 + 6.2 + 9.3 = 57.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Wockhardt LtdWOCKPHARMA | 56.1/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | LEADER | 25.0/35 Revenue 18.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 11 pp 74% evidence | 5.2/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 78.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 4.7% · RS bench 25.4% · 1Y 31.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25 + 5.2 + 8.9 + 17 = 56.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15RPG Life Sciences LtdRPGLIFE | 53.6/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence | LEADER | 11.9/35 Revenue 11.9% · PAT -34.1% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 17.4/25 ROCE 25.7% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 39.4× · PEG 1.43 65% evidence | 13.5/20 RS sector -0.7% · RS bench 20% · 1Y 18.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.9 + 17.4 + 10.8 + 13.5 = 53.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 20%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 16Zydus Lifesciences LtdZYDUSLIFE | 52.6/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 11.9/35 Revenue 21.1% · PAT -2.5% · OPM change -8 pp 100% evidence | 16.6/25 ROCE 21.1% · OPM 24% 100% evidence | 14.2/20 P/E 23.3× · PEG 1.23 100% evidence | 9.9/20 RS sector -6% · RS bench 13.4% · 1Y 21.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.9 + 16.6 + 14.2 + 9.9 = 52.6 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 17Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals LtdAKUMS | 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | LEADER | 13.4/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT -15.8% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE 14.9% · OPM 15% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 37.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.3/20 RS sector 17.2% · RS bench 40.3% · 1Y 51.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.4 + 10.9 + 9.7 + 18.3 = 52.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 40.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 18ERIS Lifesciences LtdERIS | 51.4/100Mixed-positive evidence76% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.5/35 Revenue 9.6% · PAT 62.2% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 14.1% · OPM 34% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 28.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.5/20 RS sector -13.8% · RS bench -9.8% · 1Y -21.3%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 14.3 + 11.1 + 5.5 = 51.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Suven Life Sciences LtdSUVEN | 51.3/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence | LEADER | 19.8/35 Revenue 25% · PAT -80% · OPM change -997 pp 74% evidence | 2.1/25 ROCE -79.5% · OPM — 84% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 19.4/20 RS sector 34.8% · RS bench 60% · 1Y 36.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 2.1 + 10 + 19.4 = 51.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Kilitch Drugs (India) LtdKILITCH | 47.2/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.9/35 Revenue 14% · PAT 9.3% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 9.0/25 ROCE 13.4% · OPM 6.5% 95% evidence | 14.1/20 P/E 21.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 10.2/20 RS sector -14.6% · RS bench 3.6% · 1Y -19%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.9 + 9 + 14.1 + 10.2 = 47.2 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 21J B Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals LtdJBCHEPHARM | 46.8/100Mixed-negative evidence96% evidence | 10.6/35 Revenue 5.9% · PAT 7.4% · OPM change -2 pp 88% evidence | 20.6/25 ROCE 25.4% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 3.8/20 P/E 53.8× · PEG 2.34 100% evidence | 11.8/20 RS sector 0.3% · RS bench 23.5% · 1Y 42.5%4 of 8 weeks ahead to 2026-07-19 100% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 10.6 + 20.6 + 3.8 + 11.8 = 46.8 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 22Lincoln Pharmaceuticals LtdLINCOLN | 46.4/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.1/35 Revenue 10% · PAT 11.5% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 15.1/25 ROCE 16.3% · OPM 15% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 12.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -12.4% · RS bench 5.6% · 1Y 9.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 15.1 + 10 + 6.2 = 46.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Alkem Laboratories LtdALKEM | 46.4/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.7/35 Revenue 13.4% · PAT -5.5% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence | 17.4/25 ROCE 21.2% · OPM 20% 76% evidence | 11.8/20 P/E 28.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 2.5/20 RS sector -21.5% · RS bench -4.6% · 1Y 12.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.7 + 17.4 + 11.8 + 2.5 = 46.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Sun Pharmaceutical Industries LtdSUNPHARMA | 45.6/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 17.0/35 Revenue 11.4% · PAT 16.5% · OPM change -2 pp 100% evidence | 17.1/25 ROCE 20.5% · OPM 29% 100% evidence | 4.0/20 P/E 36.7× · PEG 3.8 100% evidence | 7.5/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench 7.7% · 1Y 21.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 17.1 + 4 + 7.5 = 45.6 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 25Aurobindo Pharma LtdAUROPHARMA | 44.8/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 16.6/35 Revenue 9.1% · PAT 9.5% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 12.9% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 4.3/20 P/E 24.9× · PEG 2.67 100% evidence | 11.6/20 RS sector 2.4% · RS bench 22.8% · 1Y 55.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 12.3 + 4.3 + 11.6 = 44.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26Amrutanjan Health Care LtdAMRUTANJAN | 43.8/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.3/35 Revenue 10.7% · PAT -1.1% · OPM change -2.9 pp 95% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 24.8% · OPM 6.1% 95% evidence | 14.3/20 P/E 23× · PEG — 50% evidence | 1.4/20 RS sector -35.6% · RS bench -21% · 1Y -24.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.3 + 14.8 + 14.3 + 1.4 = 43.8 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 27Strides Pharma Science LtdSTAR | 43.5/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence | FADING | 15.7/35 Revenue 8.1% · PAT 79.1% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 12.9/25 ROCE 18.3% · OPM 18% 95% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 15.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.6/20 RS sector -17.3% · RS bench -0.4% · 1Y 20.3%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.7 + 12.9 + 11.3 + 3.6 = 43.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28Gufic BioSciences LtdGUFICBIO | 43.0/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.2/35 Revenue 16.6% · PAT 17.7% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 12.3% · OPM 18% 100% evidence | 2.1/20 P/E 57.6× · PEG 4.78 100% evidence | 8.1/20 RS sector -18.4% · RS bench 23% · 1Y 16.9%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.2 + 9.6 + 2.1 + 8.1 = 43 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 29Alembic Pharmaceuticals LtdAPLLTD | 42.3/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.6/35 Revenue 14.1% · PAT 14.6% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 21.9× · PEG 1.74 100% evidence | 5.1/20 RS sector -24.1% · RS bench -0.6% · 1Y -11.2%1 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 8.3 + 12.3 + 5.1 = 42.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 30FDC LtdFDC | 41.7/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.9/35 Revenue 3.5% · PAT 8.2% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 13.6/25 ROCE 16.7% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 11.7/20 P/E 18.7× · PEG 1.98 100% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -25.2% · RS bench -13.4% · 1Y -25.4%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.9 + 13.6 + 11.7 + 3.5 = 41.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 31Mankind Pharma LtdMANKIND | 41.3/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.8/35 Revenue 14.2% · PAT 8% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 13.7/25 ROCE 13.5% · OPM 26% 100% evidence | 5.3/20 P/E 47× · PEG 2.81 100% evidence | 5.5/20 RS sector -15.3% · RS bench 2.7% · 1Y -1.7%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 13.7 + 5.3 + 5.5 = 41.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 32Torrent Pharmaceuticals LtdTORNTPHARM | 40.3/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.6/35 Revenue 32.9% · PAT 7.7% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 15.2% · OPM 34% 100% evidence | 0.8/20 P/E 82.4× · PEG 5.11 100% evidence | 8.8/20 RS sector -4.1% · RS bench 15.4% · 1Y 35.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 14.1 + 0.8 + 8.8 = 40.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 33Bafna Pharmaceuticals LtdBAFNAPH | 40.2/100Mixed-negative evidence60% evidence | 11.6/35 Revenue -3.1% · PAT -5.8% · OPM change -11.3 pp 95% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE 11.9% · OPM 3.4% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 78.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 66.4% · 1Y — 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 11.6 + 7.3 + 9 + 12.3 = 40.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 34Zim Laboratories LtdZIMLAB | 39.4/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence | LEADER | 9.6/35 Revenue 7.5% · PAT -60.6% · OPM change -3.3 pp 71% evidence | 6.1/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 2.6% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 156× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.2/20 RS sector 7.4% · RS bench 27.8% · 1Y 41.7%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.6 + 6.1 + 8.5 + 15.2 = 39.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 27.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 35Indoco Remedies LtdINDOCO | 38.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.3/35 Revenue 11.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5 pp 71% evidence | 4.4/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -32.2% · RS bench -8.6% · 1Y -24.8%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.3 + 4.4 + 10 + 3.5 = 38.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 36Natco Pharma LtdNATCOPHARM | 37.4/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 2.9/35 Revenue -20.8% · PAT -32.5% · OPM change -18 pp 100% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 17.1% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 18.9/20 P/E 14.1× · PEG 0.76 100% evidence | 1.8/20 RS sector -21.1% · RS bench -4.6% · 1Y -0.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 2.9 + 13.8 + 18.9 + 1.8 = 37.4 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 37Bajaj Healthcare LtdBAJAJHCARE | 37.2/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | TURNING | 9.9/35 Revenue 12.3% · PAT -59.1% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 10.4/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 17% 95% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 19.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.0/20 RS sector -29.4% · RS bench -13.3% · 1Y -26.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.9 + 10.4 + 10.9 + 6 = 37.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 38Biocon LtdBIOCON | 37.0/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 13.4/35 Revenue 9.8% · PAT -36.4% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 3.6% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 93.4× · PEG 0.82 100% evidence | 6.1/20 RS sector -12.6% · RS bench 5.6% · 1Y 21.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.4 + 7.7 + 9.8 + 6.1 = 37 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 39Cipla LtdCIPLA | 32.8/100Adverse evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 4.6/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT -37.7% · OPM change -9 pp 100% evidence | 12.0/25 ROCE 15.5% · OPM 17% 100% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 32.7× · PEG 1.25 100% evidence | 4.8/20 RS sector -18.3% · RS bench -0.5% · 1Y -2.4%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.6 + 12 + 11.4 + 4.8 = 32.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 40Bharat Parenterals LtdBPLPHARMA | 32.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | 12.4/35 Revenue -11.2% · PAT 16% · OPM change -2.8 pp 71% evidence | 4.1/25 ROCE -1.8% · OPM 9.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.8/20 RS sector -12.8% · RS bench -8.3% · 1Y -23.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 12.4 + 4.1 + 10 + 5.8 = 32.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 41Dr Reddys Laboratories LtdDRREDDY | 30.2/100Adverse evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 3.7/35 Revenue -0.9% · PAT -44.6% · OPM change -14 pp 100% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 13% · OPM 11% 100% evidence | 13.3/20 P/E 31.1× · PEG 1.15 100% evidence | 1.5/20 RS sector -23.3% · RS bench -6.8% · 1Y -0.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 3.7 + 11.7 + 13.3 + 1.5 = 30.2 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 42Influx Healthtech LtdINFLUX | 63.9/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | FADING | 19.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 26% evidence | 20.8/25 ROCE 40% · OPM 19% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 32.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.7/20 RS sector 2.7% · RS bench 23.1% · 1Y 98.2%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.4 + 20.8 + 10 + 13.7 = 63.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 43Syncom Healthcare LtdSYNCOM | 50.1/100Thin evidence · provisional31% evidence | 17.1/35 Revenue -69.4% · PAT 63.5% · OPM change — 16% evidence | 6.9/25 ROCE -20.2% · OPM -225.7% 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 16.1/20 RS sector 29.1% · RS bench 45.7% · 1Y —9 of 12 weeks ahead to 2021-06-30 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 6.9 + 10 + 16.1 = 50.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 44Sai Parenterals Ltdthis pageSAIPARENT | 37.3/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 32% evidence | 5.0/25 ROCE 6% · OPM 13.2% 95% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 117× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —5 of 5 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.7 + 5 + 8.6 + 10 = 37.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Sai Parenterals Ltd's share price today?
Sai Parenterals Ltd trades at ₹552. The company is valued at ₹2,437 Cr. The stock sits at 52% of its 52-week range of ₹480–₹619, +13.8% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 18 weeks in. — as of 14 August 2026.
What were Sai Parenterals Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Sai Parenterals Ltd reported revenue of ₹179 Cr and net profit of ₹7.9 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 435.1% and profit rose 457.7% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹1.79. The operating margin was 13.2%, 1.0 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Sai Parenterals Ltd's revenue?
Sai Parenterals Ltd reported revenue of ₹179 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +435.1% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹381 Cr (+133.7%). Over the last 3 years revenue compounded at 57.8% a year. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Sai Parenterals Ltd's profit?
Sai Parenterals Ltd earned ₹7.9 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +457.7% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹14.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 13.2% in the latest quarter. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Sai Parenterals Ltd's market cap?
Sai Parenterals Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹2,437 Cr at a share price of ₹552. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Sai Parenterals Ltd's P/E ratio?
Sai Parenterals Ltd trades at a P/E of 117.0×, at the 37th percentile of its own 0-year range, against a long-run median of 167.3×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Sai Parenterals Ltd pay a dividend?
No — Sai Parenterals Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 4 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Sai Parenterals Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Sai Parenterals Ltd looks mid-range: its P/E of 117.0× sits at the 37th percentile of its 0-year range (long-run median 167.3×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Sai Parenterals Ltd growing?
Yes — Sai Parenterals Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +435.1% year on year, profit +457.7%, and the margin −1.0 pp at 13.2%. The 3-year compound rates are 57.8% (revenue) and 51.8% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 14 August 2026.
How is Sai Parenterals Ltd performing?
Sai Parenterals Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 18 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 435.1% and profit rose 457.7% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 3 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Sai Parenterals Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 18 of stage 2), trading +13.8% versus its 200-day average and at 52% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Sai Parenterals Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Sai Parenterals Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (3 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 4 months the stock moved +15% against the NIFTY 500's +3% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 14 August 2026.
Will Sai Parenterals Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Sai Parenterals Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹552, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 18 weeks in. Its P/E of 117.0× sits at the 37th percentile of its own 0-year range. — as of 14 August 2026.
Who owns Sai Parenterals Ltd?
Promoters hold 51.2% of Sai Parenterals Ltd, foreign institutions 4.0%, domestic institutions 8.5% and the public 36.3% (latest quarter). No holder moved a full point over the last two years — the register is quiet. — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Sai Parenterals Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — Sai Parenterals Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.68, and operating profit covers the interest bill 2×. FY26 borrowings were ₹333 Cr against equity of ₹491 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Sai Parenterals Ltd's capex?
Sai Parenterals Ltd spent ₹564 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹540 Cr, with ₹212 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Sai Parenterals Ltd's cash flow?
Sai Parenterals Ltd generated ₹93.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−447 Cr of free cash flow after ₹540 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹14.0 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Sai Parenterals Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 267% of Sai Parenterals Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹93.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹14.0 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 14 August 2026.
Where is Sai Parenterals Ltd in its business cycle?
Sai Parenterals Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 10.0%, against a 4-year band of 10.0%–24.0%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 13.2%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 14 August 2026.
What could break the Sai Parenterals Ltd story?
Biggest watch item: the price is already 18 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Sai Parenterals Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Sai Parenterals Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 14 August 2026.