Raymond Lifestyle Ltd
RAYMONDLSLRaymond Lifestyle Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +20.9% in a year against a −39.3% price move.
The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only 36% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch.
The price is in a downtrend (100 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 4th percentile of its own 1-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving, and 36% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the cash starts following the profit.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd trades at ₹711, in a downtrend and 100 weeks into that stage. That is −21.9% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 1% of a 52-week range of ₹706 to ₹1,322. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (1 week and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 100 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹711 it trades −21.9% versus its 200-day average and sits at 1% of its 52-week range (₹706–₹1,322).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.9 years the stock moved −74% while the NIFTY 500 moved +0% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd trades at 29.0× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 4% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 72.5×, measured across 1.2 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 29.0× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 4% of the time, against a long-run median of 72.5× measured over 1.2 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +20.9% against a −39.3% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.
Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 9 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +11.5% | +275.6% | +75.7% | — |
| Profit | +21.1% | +8.5% | — | — |
| EPS | +20.9% | — | — | — |
| Share price | −39.3% | — | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
35.4/100 — rank 21 of 26 in Textiles - Readymade Apparel · 68% evidence confidence
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd scores 35.4 out of 100 against the 26 companies it is compared with in Textiles - Readymade Apparel, ranking 21. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 17.6 + 2 + 10.2 + 5.6 = 35.4. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd reported ₹1,516 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +6.0% year on year. That is the 5th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 5 years it has compounded at 75.7% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹6,888 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹6,973 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹6,888 Cr (+11.5% on the year), capping 5 years at 75.7% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹1,516 Cr, +6.0% year on year — the 5th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +9.4% growth against the decade's 75.7% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +9.2% over the last 4 quarters against +4.1%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit +4.9% vs −71.1%/yr — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's operating margin is 6.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +1.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 2.0% to 27.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 6.0%, +1.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 2.0%–27.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +0.5 pp year on year while gross margin went −1.3 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd posted a net loss of ₹23.0 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹46.0 Cr. That loss is 1.5% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹20.0 Cr. 5 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Jun 26 profit was ₹−23.0 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹46.0 Cr (+21.1%).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 36% of Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹546 Cr of operating cash against ₹46.0 Cr of profit. After ₹312 Cr of capital spending, ₹234 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹546 Cr against reported profit of ₹46.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹234 Cr after ₹312 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 36% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
🚨 Why conversion sits at 36%: the cash cycle stretched 70 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.
Router verdict: conversion is below par and the cash cycle has stretched 70 days — the next section's job is to find where the cash is stuck.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 102 days in FY26, up from 32 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹8,749 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹6,888 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹18.9 Cr, so roughly ₹1,925 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 50 days, inventory at 217 days — roughly 7.1 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 102 days, looser than FY21's 32.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 217 days to sell; customers pay about 50 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 165 days — netting out to the 102-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹6,888 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹18.9 Cr — so the 102-day loop keeps roughly ₹1,925 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹8,749 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹938 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹141 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the working-capital loop is the cash sink the router flagged — watch the cycle, not the P&L.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd earns a ROCE of 4% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 3% in FY25. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −10.0 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 0.7% net margin on 0.49× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 4%, recovered from a FY25 trough of 3% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 0.7% net margin × 0.49× asset turns × 1.45× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 0.5% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 2.0% − 12.0% = a −10.0 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd carries total debt of ₹2,186 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹9,636 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.23 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.16 in FY24 to 0.23 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Mar 26: total debt of ₹2,186 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹9,636 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.23. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.16 (FY24) to 0.23 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Foreign institutions cut 5.3 points of Raymond Lifestyle Ltd over 7 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 7.3% of the company. Promoters moved +4.9 points over the same window, to 59.6%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: −5.3 points over 7 quarters to 7.3%; Promoters: +4.9 points over 7 quarters to 59.6%; Domestic institutions: −2.2 points over 7 quarters to 5.7%.
🚨 Why the register moved: foreign institutions drove it (−5.3 points), absorbed on the other side by promoters (+4.9 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Cantabil Retail India LtdCANTABIL | 68.7/100Favorable setup77% evidence | TURNING | 23.6/35 Revenue 18% · PAT 28% · OPM change 4 pp 83% evidence | 19.6/25 ROCE 19.1% · OPM 31% 95% evidence | 12.6/20 P/E 21.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 12.9/20 RS sector 10.1% · RS bench -4.2% · 1Y -8.6%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.6 + 19.6 + 12.6 + 12.9 = 68.7 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2V2 Retail LtdV2RETAIL | 66.6/100Favorable setup79% evidence | LEADER | 28.6/35 Revenue 62.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2 pp 88% evidence | 15.3/25 ROCE 19.3% · OPM 14% 100% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 56× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.3/20 RS sector 5.4% · RS bench 2.5% · 1Y 13.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 28.6 + 15.3 + 9.4 + 13.3 = 66.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Kewal Kiran Clothing LtdKKCL | 66.3/100Favorable setup96% evidence | FADING | 19.7/35 Revenue 21.1% · PAT 2% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence | 18.5/25 ROCE 18.1% · OPM 19% 100% evidence | 16.4/20 P/E 21.6× · PEG 0.59 100% evidence | 11.7/20 RS sector 2.3% · RS bench -0.7% · 1Y -9.1%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 18.5 + 16.4 + 11.7 = 66.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Iris Clothings LtdIRISDOREME | 64.2/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | LEADER | 22.3/35 Revenue 31.8% · PAT 31.9% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 16% · OPM 17% 95% evidence | 7.6/20 P/E 57.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 53% · RS bench 48.9% · 1Y 73.8%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.3 + 14.3 + 7.6 + 20 = 64.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5SBC Exports LtdSBC | 58.7/100Mixed-positive evidence83% evidence | LEADER | 26.2/35 Revenue 34.4% · PAT 86.6% · OPM change -0.6 pp 83% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 18.2% · OPM 4.2% 95% evidence | 6.7/20 P/E 79.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 14.3/20 RS sector 39.5% · RS bench 36.9% · 1Y 141.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.2 + 11.5 + 6.7 + 14.3 = 58.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Pearl Global Industries LtdPGIL | 58.7/100Mixed-positive evidence78% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.0/35 Revenue 11.5% · PAT 17.3% · OPM change 0 pp 83% evidence | 16.9/25 ROCE 19.9% · OPM 10% 76% evidence | 7.2/20 P/E 34.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 18.6/20 RS sector 33% · RS bench 29.8% · 1Y 35.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16 + 16.9 + 7.2 + 18.6 = 58.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 29.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 7V-Mart Retail LtdVMART | 58.3/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 25.6/35 Revenue 19.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 7.2/25 ROCE 13.2% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 7.3/20 P/E 44.7× · PEG 2.5 65% evidence | 18.2/20 RS sector 13.8% · RS bench 10% · 1Y -3.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.6 + 7.2 + 7.3 + 18.2 = 58.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8S P Apparels LtdSPAL | 57.0/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence | LEADER | 14.9/35 Revenue 13.2% · PAT 8.5% · OPM change -2 pp 88% evidence | 12.5/25 ROCE 14% · OPM 12% 100% evidence | 11.7/20 P/E 24.7× · PEG 0.69 100% evidence | 17.9/20 RS sector 28.9% · RS bench 25.4% · 1Y 19.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.9 + 12.5 + 11.7 + 17.9 = 57 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 25.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 9Monte Carlo Fashions LtdMONTECARLO | 56.3/100Mixed-positive evidence69% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.6/35 Revenue 15.9% · PAT 38.1% · OPM change 6.5 pp 62% evidence | 9.5/25 ROCE 14% · OPM 9.2% 95% evidence | 14.5/20 P/E 9.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 9.7/20 RS sector 0% · RS bench -14.5% · 1Y -12.2%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.6 + 9.5 + 14.5 + 9.7 = 56.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Trent LtdTRENT | 54.8/100Mixed-positive evidence89% evidence | TURNING | 23.0/35 Revenue 17.1% · PAT 12.1% · OPM change 3 pp 88% evidence | 19.9/25 ROCE 28.3% · OPM 18% 100% evidence | 3.7/20 P/E 92.8× · PEG 6.56 65% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector -21.8% · RS bench 1.5% · 1Y -40.4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23 + 19.9 + 3.7 + 8.2 = 54.8 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 11Arvind Fashions LtdARVINDFASN | 53.7/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence | TURNING | 23.5/35 Revenue 14% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 19.6% · OPM 12% 100% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 45.9× · PEG 1.95 65% evidence | 6.4/20 RS sector -4.5% · RS bench -7.5% · 1Y -10%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.5 + 14.9 + 8.9 + 6.4 = 53.7 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -4.5% and the one-year return is -10%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 12Aditya Birla Lifestyle Brands LtdABLBL | 51.7/100Mixed-positive evidence78% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.0/35 Revenue 9.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 12.0/25 ROCE 15% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 54.1× · PEG 1.39 65% evidence | 8.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench -19% · 1Y -35.1%0 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20 + 12 + 11.4 + 8.3 = 51.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Thomas Scott India LtdTHOMASCOTT | 51.0/100Thin evidence · provisional54% evidence | 18.2/35 Revenue 61.5% · PAT 54.4% · OPM change -0.4 pp 53% evidence | 15.1/25 ROCE 20.4% · OPM 11.8% 71% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 21× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.7/20 RS sector -5.2% · RS bench -17.3% · 1Y -25.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-29 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 18.2 + 15.1 + 11 + 6.7 = 51 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14Credo Brands Marketing LtdMUFTI | 50.9/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | FADING | 13.5/35 Revenue 0% · PAT -3.4% · OPM change -2 pp 45% evidence | 17.0/25 ROCE 19.1% · OPM 29% 71% evidence | 12.6/20 P/E 7.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 7.8/20 RS sector -12.7% · RS bench -15.7% · 1Y -49.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.5 + 17 + 12.6 + 7.8 = 50.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Vishal Mega Mart LtdVMM | 50.5/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.8/35 Revenue 19.8% · PAT 29.6% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 14.8% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 4.7/20 P/E 56.2× · PEG 5.39 65% evidence | 10.2/20 RS sector 2.7% · RS bench -17.7% · 1Y -23.5%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.8 + 11.8 + 4.7 + 10.2 = 50.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Bella Casa Fashion & Retail LtdBELLACASA | 50.2/100Mixed-positive evidence61% evidence | 22.4/35 Revenue 21.8% · PAT 37% · OPM change -0.3 pp 53% evidence | 12.7/25 ROCE 17.2% · OPM 8.7% 71% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 3.9/20 RS sector -20.8% · RS bench -31.3% · 1Y -41.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-29 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 22.4 + 12.7 + 11.2 + 3.9 = 50.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Vedant Fashions LtdMANYAVAR | 47.5/100Mixed-negative evidence90% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.9/35 Revenue 2.4% · PAT 0.8% · OPM change -0.7 pp 88% evidence | 19.4/25 ROCE 30.7% · OPM 33.8% 100% evidence | 14.4/20 P/E 25× · PEG 1.61 100% evidence | 3.8/20 RS sector -32% · RS bench -22.2% · 1Y -47.4%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.9 + 19.4 + 14.4 + 3.8 = 47.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 18Sai Silks (Kalamandir) LtdKALAMANDIR | 47.1/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.3/35 Revenue 4.8% · PAT 20.2% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 15.4/25 ROCE 14.4% · OPM 14% 95% evidence | 14.4/20 P/E 10× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.0/20 RS sector -16.9% · RS bench -33.5% · 1Y -51.9%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.3 + 15.4 + 14.4 + 4 = 47.1 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 19Lux Industries LtdLUXIND | 38.6/100Mixed-negative evidence78% evidence | ASLEEP | 10.1/35 Revenue 13.4% · PAT -35.8% · OPM change -2 pp 83% evidence | 7.8/25 ROCE 8.1% · OPM 7% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 34.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 11.7/20 RS sector 5.9% · RS bench 2.6% · 1Y -11.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.1 + 7.8 + 9 + 11.7 = 38.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Baazar Style Retail LtdSTYLEBAAZA | 35.8/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.1/35 Revenue 37% · PAT 100% · OPM change -2 pp 65% evidence | 6.3/25 ROCE 7.4% · OPM 10% 100% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 93.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.8/20 RS sector -13.1% · RS bench -15.6% · 1Y 0.1%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 6.3 + 8.6 + 2.8 = 35.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21Raymond Lifestyle Ltdthis pageRAYMONDLSL | 35.4/100Mixed-negative evidence68% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.6/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT 4.9% · OPM change 1 pp 74% evidence | 2.0/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 6% 100% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 29× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.6/20 RS sector -8.1% · RS bench -26.6% · 1Y -35.3%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 2 + 10.2 + 5.6 = 35.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 22Go Fashion (India) LtdGOCOLORS | 30.5/100Adverse evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 4.7/35 Revenue -1.6% · PAT -39.1% · OPM change -4 pp 95% evidence | 10.2/25 ROCE 10.6% · OPM 27% 95% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 32.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 3.3/20 RS sector -47.6% · RS bench -28.4% · 1Y -61.9%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.7 + 10.2 + 12.3 + 3.3 = 30.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Aditya Birla Fashion & Retail LtdABFRL | 30.2/100Adverse evidence61% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.6/35 Revenue 11.2% · PAT -80% · OPM change -3 pp 62% evidence | 3.9/25 ROCE -3.1% · OPM 9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.7/20 RS sector -13% · RS bench -15.9% · 1Y -18.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.6 + 3.9 + 10 + 3.7 = 30.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Gokaldas Exports LtdGOKEX | 28.3/100Adverse evidence90% evidence | TURNING | 8.5/35 Revenue 3.2% · PAT -36.7% · OPM change -1 pp 88% evidence | 8.1/25 ROCE 8.4% · OPM 11% 100% evidence | 1.9/20 P/E 59.6× · PEG 4.98 100% evidence | 9.8/20 RS sector -6.8% · RS bench 7.5% · 1Y -9.6%8 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.5 + 8.1 + 1.9 + 9.8 = 28.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25Kitex Garments LtdKITEX | 22.5/100Adverse evidence65% evidence | ASLEEP | 3.9/35 Revenue -32.1% · PAT -80% · OPM change -16 pp 83% evidence | 4.5/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 1% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 290× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.6/20 RS sector -9.2% · RS bench -19.1% · 1Y -44%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 3.9 + 4.5 + 8.5 + 5.6 = 22.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26Karnika Industries LtdKARNIKA | 59.8/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.3 pp 19% evidence | 20.9/25 ROCE 51.2% · OPM 17.2% 95% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 26.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector -2.4% · RS bench -16.3% · 1Y -16.7%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.3 + 20.9 + 10.4 + 8.2 = 59.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's share price today?
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd trades at ₹711, −39.3% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹4,329 Cr. The stock sits at 1% of its 52-week range of ₹706–₹1,322, −21.9% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 100 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.
What were Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd reported revenue of ₹1,516 Cr and a net loss of ₹23.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹−3.71. The operating margin was 6.0%, 1.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's revenue?
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd reported revenue of ₹1,516 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +6.0% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹6,888 Cr (+11.5%). Over the last 5 years revenue compounded at 75.7% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's profit?
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd earned ₹−23.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹46.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 6.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's market cap?
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹4,329 Cr at a share price of ₹711. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's P/E ratio?
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd trades at a P/E of 29.0×, at the 4th percentile of its own 1-year range, against a long-run median of 72.5×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Raymond Lifestyle Ltd pay a dividend?
Yes — Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's dividend payout was 13% of profit in FY26, and it recorded a payout in 1 of its last 6 reported fiscal years. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Raymond Lifestyle Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Raymond Lifestyle Ltd looks cheap against its own history: its P/E of 29.0× has been cheaper only 4% of the time in 1 years (long-run median 72.5×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.
How is Raymond Lifestyle Ltd performing?
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd is in a downtrend, 100 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Raymond Lifestyle Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 100 of stage 4), trading −21.9% versus its 200-day average and at 1% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Raymond Lifestyle Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Raymond Lifestyle Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.9 years the stock moved −74% against the NIFTY 500's +0% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.
Will Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Raymond Lifestyle Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹711, the price is in a downtrend 100 weeks in. Its P/E of 29.0× sits at the 4th percentile of its own 1-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.
Who owns Raymond Lifestyle Ltd?
Promoters hold 59.6% of Raymond Lifestyle Ltd, foreign institutions 7.3%, domestic institutions 5.7% and the public 27.3% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Foreign institutions cut 5.3 points over 7 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Raymond Lifestyle Ltd have too much debt?
No — Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.23, and operating profit covers the interest bill 3×. FY26 borrowings were ₹2,186 Cr against equity of ₹9,636 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's capex?
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd spent ₹8,749 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹312 Cr, with ₹141 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's cash flow?
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd generated ₹546 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹234 Cr of free cash flow after ₹312 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹46.0 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's profit real cash?
Not fully — over the last 3 fiscal years, 36% of Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹546 Cr against reported profit of ₹46.0 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into the working-capital cycle. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.
Where is Raymond Lifestyle Ltd in its business cycle?
Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 10.0%, against a 6-year band of 2.0%–27.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 6.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.
What could break the Raymond Lifestyle Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only 36% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Raymond Lifestyle Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Raymond Lifestyle Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +20.9% in a year against a −39.3% price move. The sharpest open question: whether the cash starts following the profit. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.