RBZ Jewellers share price today

RBZ Jewellers Ltd's share price was ₹171.38 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been rising for 13 weeks. That is 10.9% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹110 and ₹201, and at that close it sat 68% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today RBZ Jewellers Ltd is in stage 2. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the NIFTY 500, and it has stayed ahead for 12 weeks in a row.

Over the last 2.8 years the share price moved +48% while the NIFTY 500 moved +13%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

2. Revenue up on a year earlier for 4 quarters in a row

   In the June 2026 quarter revenue was ₹121 crore, +59.8% on a year earlier.

3. Profit up on a year earlier for 4 quarters in a row

   In the June 2026 quarter profit was ₹9 crore, +27.7% on a year earlier.

For April to June 2026 (the quarter ended 30 June 2026), RBZ Jewellers reported revenue of ₹121 crore, up 59.8% from ₹75.6 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹9.09 crore, up 27.7% from ₹7.12 crore.

RBZ Jewellers results: April to June 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for July to September 2026, are due by 14 November 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

RBZ Jewellers' management discussed these results on a call held on 30 September 2026; what it said is further down this page.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 June 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

RBZ Jewellers closed at ₹171.38 on 4 November 2026, up 9.6% from ₹156.35 a year earlier (7 November 2025). Its highest weekly close since December 2023 was ₹232.15 on 12 January 2024.

RBZ Jewellers share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 4 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

156 weekly closes from 29 December 2023 to 4 November 2026.

4 Nov 2026: RBZ Jewellers closed at ₹171.38, down 0.7% on the week and down 12.9% on the month. Our read, 10 Oct 2026: RBZ's retail rollout provides a dated earnings opportunity, but borrowed inventory, undisclosed gold gains and launch costs prevent treating reported profit as distributable cash.

Earlier

• 30 Sep 2026: RBZ Jewellers held its results call for April to June 2026. Management guided: Rajkot showroom to open before Diwali, with dates finalized within the week.
• Results for April to June 2026: Revenue up 59.8% and profit up 27.7% on a year earlier.

Our read of the business

April to June 2026: Surat is operating; profit conversion and inventory funding remain the tests.

Our read after the April to June 2026 results, written 10 October 2026.

RBZ Jewellers has paid no dividend on the NSE since its first NSE close in our records (29 December 2023), the start of the period we checked.

No. RBZ Jewellers Ltd paid out 0% of its profit as dividends in each of its last 7 reported years, so there is no payout history to show. That comes from the filed annual statements, not an estimate.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

On the call for April to June 2026, held on 30 September 2026, RBZ Jewellers' management guided: Rajkot showroom to open before Diwali, with dates finalized within the week.

“Going forward, you can see that within approximately 3 years, this company will be a 100% inventory-hedged company.”Harit Zaveri, on the call for April to June 2026

What management guided

• Maninagar and Gandhinagar showrooms planned for Q3 readiness; locations signed and interior work started.
• New stores expected to remain in growth phase for 2-3 years, mature in 3-5 years, and reach capital spending break-even within 1 year.
• Company aims to become 100% inventory-hedged within approximately 3 years, with hedging rising quarter-on-quarter.
• GML planned to maximize inventory funding; cited cost of 3.5%-4% or lower versus 8%-9% normal interest, with debt-to-equity moving from 1.0:1.0 toward 2.0:1.0 and equity dilution last resort.

Management’s own plans and goals, from our notes of the call. A plan is not a result.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for April to June 2026, 30 September 2026.

What is changing at RBZ Jewellers, from the latest results and calls: retail rollout and customer ownership, inventory hedging and funding redesign and customer-supplied gold in job work.

• Retail rollout and customer ownership. Surat converts the retail expansion plan into an operating test; the remaining Gujarat launches extend the same mechanism. ✓ fact
• Inventory hedging and funding redesign. Gold metal loans can reduce interest cost and metal-price exposure, conditional on bank limits and actual adoption. ⚠ estimate
• Manufacturing capacity headroom. Existing factory headroom can serve demand without an immediate manufacturing expansion. ✓ fact

We check 16 kinds of change in every company, such as costs spread over more sales, higher-value products, new orders, new regions or falling debt, against its reported numbers and what management said on its calls. Only changes the numbers back are shown.

Our read after the April to June 2026 results, written 10 October 2026.

Launches slip again or operating stores fail to cover incremental costs while company-funded inventory continues to grow.

Each change stops working if

• Retail rollout and customer ownership: Launches slip again or operating stores fail to cover incremental costs while company-funded inventory continues to grow.
• Inventory hedging and funding redesign: Bank sub-limits fail to activate or borrowing grows faster than the funding savings and inventory turnover.
• Customer-supplied gold in job work: Customers reject advance-gold arrangements and the wholesale alternative requires more inventory financing.
• Manufacturing capacity headroom: Utilization remains near its current level or incremental demand requires costs that offset factory absorption.

The main risks

• Debt-funded cash gap: Reported earnings have not funded operating cash needs, and new borrowing supports the expansion. ⚠ estimate
• Gold-gain and margin normalization: Reported margins include metal-price effects that cannot yet be separated reliably from store profitability. ⚠ estimate
• New-store execution and customer response: Store openings and customer adoption may arrive later than the inventory and launch expenses. ⚠ estimate
• Guidance continuity: Withdrawn forecasts and revised launch dates limit the reliability of long-range extrapolation. ⚠ estimate

Our read after the April to June 2026 results, written 10 October 2026.

When RBZ Jewellers reports July to September 2026, these are the 4 checks that show whether the story is still on course. First: Rajkot opening before Diwali - check whether the next launch meets the stated timing.

RBZ Jewellers is on 3 of our India lists: Multibagger study list, Momentum stocks and Gold & silver stocks.

RBZ Jewellers Ltd earned ₹9.1 Cr of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +27.7% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 4th quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹55.0 Cr. Over 6 years profit has grown 62.4% a year on average. That is 7.5% of the quarter's revenue.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹7.1 Cr.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹55.0 Cr (+41.0% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +59.8% on a year earlier and the margin moved −2.3 percentage points. Sales did the work while the margin got thinner.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +56.8% and revenue +34.8%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra rupee of revenue adds more to profit.

FY27-Q1. Surat is operating; profit conversion and inventory funding remain the tests

Why-sources: our stock research file (10 October 2026) and the company’s own results for those quarters.

RBZ Jewellers Ltd reported ₹121 Cr of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +59.8% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 4th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 6 years it has grown 23.2% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹636 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹682 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹636 Cr, +20.0% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +34.8% on average, against 23.2% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +30.3%, against +37.9% a year over the last 8 quarters (rolling over); profit over the last 12 months grew +54.0%, against +44.9% a year (accelerating).

FY27-Q1. Surat is operating; profit conversion and inventory funding remain the tests

Why-sources: our stock research file (10 October 2026) and the company’s own results for those quarters.

RBZ Jewellers Ltd's operating margin was 14.8% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 2.3 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 7 years it has been between 6.0% and 19.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why this happened. Commodity Escape Velocity remains incomplete. Management describes lower inventory funding and a gradual hedge rollout, but the benefit is offset by foregone gold appreciation and the possibility of higher leverage. The first measurable contribution is disclosed funded inventory and hedging progression; the eventual profit benefit requires the funding saving to exceed lost inventory gains and the cost of additional debt.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −2.3 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −5.1 points. So the drop came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

FY27-Q1. Surat is operating; profit conversion and inventory funding remain the tests

Why-sources: our stock research file (10 October 2026) and the company’s own results for those quarters.

Over the last 3 years RBZ Jewellers Ltd's operations used more cash than they brought in, so cash conversion was −61%, a gap worth watching. In FY26 its operations used ₹7.0 Cr of cash, against ₹55.0 Cr of profit. After ₹55.0 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹62.0 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why −61% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 178 days shorter between FY21 and FY26, so cash that used to wait in the business now arrives sooner. When less than 70% of profit comes in as cash, it is the thing to watch on this page.

What to look at next: the bigger use of cash is spending on new assets, at 8.6× depreciation over three years. The next section checks what that spending is building.

RBZ Jewellers Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 279 days in FY26, down from 457 days in FY21. It spent ₹69.0 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 32 days to pay, and stock sits for 251 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

Why this happened. The Value Chain Climb applies because RBZ keeps the retail customer relationship and making-charge economics. Surat is operating, and additional locations have dated readiness commitments. Earnings contribution depends on sales after opening exceeding incremental staff, advertising, lease and financing costs. Early customer response is qualitative; a repeatable store return has not yet been demonstrated. Rival pricing responses are unknown.

At FY26 sales of ₹636 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹1.7 Cr, so roughly ₹486 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 32 days to pay and stock sat for 251 days, about 8.3 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of 279 days, shorter than FY21's 457.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 251 days. Customers pay about 32 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 5 days. Together that makes the 279-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹69.0 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹8.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹25.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

RBZ Jewellers Ltd's P/E is 12.1×, near the low end of its own history: it has been lower only 29% of the time. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 15.3×, over 2.8 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +41.2% while the price moved +9.6%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Worked out from its price on 11 October 2026, RBZ Jewellers Ltd's share price assumed profit growth of about 4.8% a year. Over the past 6 years its profit actually grew 62.4% a year. Today its P/E is 12.1×, lower than 71% of its own last 2.8 years.

This works the share price backwards. It asks one question: what yearly profit growth does the price already assume? The answer is the growth rate at which eleven years of profit (six years of growth, then five years of slowing) add up to that day's market value, after each year is discounted at 11%.

This is a one-day reading, taken on 11 October 2026. Every other number on this page, the multiple included, uses the latest price as of 4 November 2026. A higher price assumes more growth and a lower price less, so it changes whenever the price changes, and this page does not update it between measurements.

RBZ Jewellers Ltd's business is giving mixed signals. There is no clear direction across the growth lines, with ROCE rising at 30.5%; each line tells part of the story. This is based on 11 quarters of 3 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: when the lines disagree, each line above matters more than any single label.

One or more growth lines have an extreme jump caused by comparing with a near-zero or loss-making quarter. Those jumps are capped before reading and drawn at the edge of the chart, so one odd quarter does not decide the result.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

RBZ Jewellers Ltd's story is not scored yet against the checks our research set on 10 October 2026. Where it sits in its own cycle: MID EXPANSION.

NOT YET CHECKED

Our read, 10 October 2026. RBZ's retail rollout provides a dated earnings opportunity, but borrowed inventory, undisclosed gold gains and launch costs prevent treating reported profit as distributable cash.

From the price. Price stage 2, week 13, above its 200-day line, relative strength falling.

From the research. RBZ's retail rollout provides a dated earnings opportunity, but borrowed inventory, undisclosed gold gains and launch costs prevent treating reported profit as distributable cash.

Where they disagree. There is no evidence-backed basis to call this a trough-margin recovery or to extrapolate peak quarterly margins.

What is proven. RBZ's retail rollout provides a dated earnings opportunity, but borrowed inventory, undisclosed gold gains and launch costs prevent treating reported profit as distributable cash.

The test written in advance. Debt-funded cash gap. Measured by: Debt-funded cash gap Operating cash remains negative after the new-store festive ramp while borrowings and receivable days increase. by the next result.

The test written in advance. Gold-gain and margin normalization. Measured by: Gold-gain and margin normalization Operating margins decline after openings even when sales rise, or inventory gains continue to be undisclosed. by the next result.

What the company does. Surat is operating, while Rajkot and the smaller Gujarat stores provide the next execution tests. Retail can capture more of the jewellery value chain, but the company also retains the inventory and finances the customer-acquisition period.

The key numbers to watch, and the level that would change the picture

Everything further down this page is evidence for or against these.

What the surface reading misses. The surface reading is: Higher sales and profit suggest successful expansion. The research reads it further: Operating margin fell against the comparable quarter while interest and depreciation increased; revenue therefore converted into profit less efficiently. Surat's September operating status cannot explain June sales.

What the surface reading misses. The surface reading is: The latest annual-end quarter delivered higher earnings. The research reads it further: Revenue and operating profit both rose against the prior-year quarter, but the annual margin explanation includes inventory appreciation as well as fixed-cost absorption.

• 1 · Operating leveragequiet
• 2 · Value-added mixquiet
• 3 · Management changequiet
• 4 · Paying down debtbuilding
• 5 · Regulatory approvalquiet
• 6 · Order-book winsquiet
• 7 · Consolidationquiet
• 8 · Demerger or value unlockquiet
• 9 · Buybackquiet
• 10 · New geographiesquiet
• 11 · More business from existing customersquiet
• 12 · New product launchquiet
• 13 · Mandatory normsquiet
• 14 · A bigger market to servequiet
• 15 · Market-share gainsquiet
• 16 · Asset qualityquiet

Lever 4 · Paying down debt: building. Gold metal loans can reduce interest cost and metal-price exposure, conditional on bank limits and actual adoption. What proves it keeps working: Inventory hedging and funding redesign. It stops working if Bank sub-limits fail to activate or borrowing grows faster than the funding savings and inventory turnover.

Sources: our stock research file (10 October 2026) · quarterly results through Jun 2026 · the company’s own earnings calls. The story check is re-scored every results season; the record below never changes.

The whole page in one table. Each row links to its section.

What RBZ Jewellers Ltd's management promised, against what actually happened: 4 promises on the record. Read straight from the company’s own earnings calls. A promise that slipped stays on this page after it is met.

Prior-Quarter Guidance Claim Conflicts with the May Call · 12 August 2026. In Aug 2026, management said Q1 FY27 revenue growth was in line with guidance shared in the previous quarter. However, the May 2026 call explicitly said management was not giving guidance for the year; the latest call did not identify the supposed guidance period or amount, leaving an unresolved inconsistency in the basis for tracking performance.

Store-Level Revenue Forecast Withdrawn · 12 August 2026. In Feb 2026, management provided explicit revenue projections for the Surat and Rajkot stores. In Aug 2026, despite the stores nearing launch, management declined to disclose any forecast and deferred visibility to Q3 without stating whether the earlier projections had been revised or retained.

FY27 Revenue and PAT Guidance Withdrawn Without Acknowledgment · 15 May 2026. In the Feb 2026 call, management provided explicit FY27 guidance of INR 800-900 crores in revenue and INR 55-60 crores in PAT, giving analysts concrete numbers to anchor forward-looking models. In the May 2026 call, when directly asked the same question, management completely withdrew this guidance without acknowledging the prior figures or providing revised estimates, citing near-term macro uncertainty - a material credibility concern for any analyst who had built a model on the Feb 2026 numbers.

New Store Revenue Projections Abandoned · 15 May 2026. Management gave specific long-term maturity goals for the Surat and Rajkot stores in the Nov 2025 call (INR 500 crores and INR 400 crores by year 4-5) and first-year revenue guidance in the Feb 2026 call (INR 150 crores for Surat and INR 125 crores for Rajkot). In the May 2026 call, when directly asked how long these stores would take to reach Ahmedabad-level sales, management declined to provide any figure or timeline, stating it was too nascent to comment - a complete retreat from two successive quarters of store-level guidance with no formal revision or acknowledgment of the change.

Every quote above is taken word for word from the company’s own earnings calls.

Manufacturing expansion was deferred while retail inventory is debt-funded; restraint is sensible but does not prove profitable allocation through a complete downturn.

Regulatory and governance record

Employee theft was disclosed, insured and followed by a reported insurance receipt; this is a control lapse, not evidence of fraud by the company’s management. No named company/promoter/key-officer conduct finding, live material case, lie or huge unowned miss is established.

Checked 14 October 2026.

RBZ Jewellers Ltd earned a ROCE of 22% in FY26. That is up from a low of 16% in FY24. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 0.7 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 8.6% net margin and 1.31× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 8.6% net margin × 1.31× asset turnover × 1.62× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 18.3% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 12.7% − 12.0% = +0.7 percentage points. The 12.0% is a standard assumption for the cost of capital in India, not an estimate for this company. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Positive but thin: it creates value with little room for error.

The 12.7% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY26 at 16.2%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method.

RBZ Jewellers Ltd has total debt of ₹170 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹300 Cr as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 0.57× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from 1.04 in FY23 to 0.57 in FY26. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

Domestic institutions cut their stake in RBZ Jewellers Ltd by 1.7 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Domestic institutions now own 0.0% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −0.7 points over the same period, to 0.3%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Domestic institutions: −1.7 points over 8 quarters, to 0.0%; Foreign institutions: −0.7 points over 8 quarters, to 0.3%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters, to 75.0%.

Why the owners changed: domestic institutions drove it (−1.7 points), together with foreign institutions (−0.7 points). They reduced their stake.

For RBZ Jewellers Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

61.7 out of 100, rank 8 of 28 in Diamond, Gems & Jewellery, with 96% of the evidence available.

RBZ Jewellers Ltd scores 61.7 out of 100 against the 28 companies it is compared with in Diamond, Gems & Jewellery, ranking 8. The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 18.7 + 14.6 + 16.4 + 12 = 61.7. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

RBZ Jewellers ranks 8 of 28 Diamond, Gems & Jewellery companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 61.7 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Diamond, Gems & Jewellery, all 28 compared on one page.

RBZ Jewellers is the 23rd largest of 27 Diamond, Gems & Jewellery companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Asian Star Company, SJ Corporation and Manoj Vaibhav Gems N Jewellers. Just below it: Radhika Jeweltech, Grover Jewells and PNGS Gargi Fashion Jewellery.

Diamond, Gems & Jewellery companies close in size

20. Asian Star Company Ltd ₹1,042 crore
21. SJ Corporation Ltd ₹845 crore
22. Manoj Vaibhav Gems N Jewellers Ltd ₹799 crore
23. RBZ Jewellers Ltd ₹690 crore
24. Radhika Jeweltech Ltd ₹686 crore
25. Grover Jewells Ltd ₹540 crore
26. PNGS Gargi Fashion Jewellery Ltd ₹527 crore

All 27 Diamond, Gems & Jewellery companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

1821. SRIT India Ltd ₹692 crore
1822. Kronox Lab Sciences Ltd ₹691 crore · Speciality Chemicals
1823. RBZ Jewellers Ltd ₹690 crore
1824. Vascon Engineers Ltd ₹690 crore · Construction & Contracting
1825. Merritronix Ltd ₹689 crore · Electronics - Others

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.