Hercules Investments Ltd
HERCULESHercules Investments Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −31.6% in a year while annual EPS moved −84.5% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is in a downtrend (15 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 1st percentile of its own 10-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read mixed — profit +96.2% year on year, and 33% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Hercules Investments Ltd trades at ₹99.2, in a downtrend and 15 weeks into that stage. That is −35.1% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 0% of a 52-week range of ₹99 to ₹207. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (16 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 15 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹99.2 it trades −35.1% versus its 200-day average and sits at 0% of its 52-week range (₹99–₹207).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.0 years the stock moved +159% while the NIFTY 500 moved +236% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (16 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2025-12-05) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Hercules Investments Ltd trades at 8.6× P/E, about the cheapest it has ever traded. Its long-run median P/E is 14.2×, measured across 10.1 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 8.6× is about the cheapest it has ever traded, against a long-run median of 14.2× measured over 10.1 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −84.5% against a −31.6% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +22.7%/yr price move, ~+11.5%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+11.2 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
What the price assumes This reading works the multiple backwards. It asks one question: what yearly rate of profit growth is a buyer at the market price already paying for? The number is the growth rate that makes eleven years of profit — six years growing, then five fading — add up to that day's market price, once each year is discounted at 11% a year.
At its price on 13 June 2026, Hercules Investments Ltd was priced for profit growth of about 25.9% a year. Profit itself has compounded −7.9% a year over the past 10 years. The market pays that at 8.6× P/E, the 1st percentile of its own 10-year range.
What the two numbers say together. The multiple is low against its own past, and the growth the price is paying for is above what this company has actually delivered. Both readings sit on the same earnings, so they are one reading rather than two. A multiple that looks low because earnings fell is not the same thing as a low bar to clear.
How to hold this number: it is a reading of one day's price, taken on 13 June 2026, not a running figure. A higher price is paying for more growth and a lower price for less, so it moves whenever the price does, and this page does not restate it between measurements. Every other number on this page is read off the live quote.
Stage: Turning around Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Hercules Investments Ltd reads as turning around on its fundamental arc. Turning around — profit growth swung from −100.0% at the trough to +96.2% off a 1-quarter-old trough (single-quarter readings), ROCE slipping at 0.7%. The read is built from 9 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: growth inflections are where re-ratings start — the curves say a turn is forming, so the question becomes whether the next quarters confirm it.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profit | −84.5% | −28.0% | −15.5% | −7.9% |
| EPS | −84.5% | −28.0% | −15.6% | −7.9% |
| Share price | −31.6% | +22.7% | +25.7% | +8.8% |
4-Factor Sector Score
38.8/100 — rank 11 of 16 in Capital Goods - Engineering Heavy · 55% evidence confidence
Hercules Investments Ltd scores 38.8 out of 100 against the 16 companies it is compared with in Capital Goods - Engineering Heavy, ranking 11. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 13.8 + 8.7 + 12.7 + 3.6 = 38.8. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Hercules Investments Ltd reported ₹0.0 Cr of revenue in the Sep 25 quarter. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹0.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹0.0 Cr. A multi-year compound rate is not shown because the annual history behind it is too short to compute one honestly.
FY25 revenue came in at ₹0.0 Cr (−100.0% on the year). The latest quarter (Sep 25) printed ₹0.0 Cr, null year on year.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −100.0% over the last 4 quarters against −100.0%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit −74.3% vs −72.9%/yr — stabilising.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
A clean operating margin is not in our numbers for Hercules Investments Ltd — its accounts do not report the operating-profit line this section reads, which is common for lenders and holding companies. The sections above and below carry the readings this company's filings do support.
This company's accounts do not report the operating-profit line this section reads — common for lenders and holding companies classified outside the financial bucket. The revenue and net-profit sections are the cleaner reads for Hercules Investments Ltd.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +3.7 pp year on year while gross margin went +3.9 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Hercules Investments Ltd earned ₹5.2 Cr of net profit in the Sep 25 quarter, +96.2% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹5.6 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is −7.9%. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹2.6 Cr. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Sep 25 profit was ₹5.2 Cr, +96.2% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed ₹5.6 Cr (−84.5%), and the 10-year compound rate is −7.9%.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −44.4% vs revenue −100.0%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 33% of Hercules Investments Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY25 that was ₹7.6 Cr of operating cash against ₹5.6 Cr of profit. After ₹−34.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹42.0 Cr was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of ₹7.6 Cr against reported profit of ₹5.6 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹42.0 Cr after ₹−34.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 33% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
🚨 Why conversion sits at 33%: the cash cycle tightened 174 days between FY19 and FY24 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Hercules Investments Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 39 days in FY24, down from 213 days in FY19. Capital spending ran ₹−21.0 Cr over the last 3 years. Customers take 40 days to pay and stock waits 83 days to sell.
FY24: debtors at 40 days, inventory at 83 days — roughly 2.7 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 39 days, tighter than FY19's 213.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 83 days to sell; customers pay about 40 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 84 days — netting out to the 39-day cycle.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹−21.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹8.0 Cr of depreciation — spending at or below maintenance level. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY25) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Hercules Investments Ltd earns a ROCE of 1% in FY25. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −11.0 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 20.0% net margin on 0.17× asset turns.
FY25 ROCE is 1%.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY24): 20.0% net margin × 0.17× asset turns × 1.11× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 3.8% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 1.0% − 12.0% = a −11.0 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Hercules Investments Ltd carries ₹0.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹846 Cr of equity in FY25, a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹0.0 Cr to ₹0.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹−21.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY25: borrowings of ₹0.0 Cr against equity of ₹846 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹0.0 Cr to ₹0.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹−21.0 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
No holder of Hercules Investments Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. Domestic institutions moved −0.1 points over the same window, to 0.0%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: −0.1 points over 8 quarters to 0.0%; Domestic institutions: −0.1 points over 8 quarters to 0.0%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 69.6%.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Hercules Investments Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1JNK India LtdJNKINDIA | 75.9/100Favorable setup83% evidence | LEADER | 32.2/35 Revenue 84.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5.5 pp 100% evidence | 14.5/25 ROCE 17.4% · OPM 8.8% 100% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 33.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.8/20 RS sector 26.6% · RS bench 42.1% · 1Y 58.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 32.2 + 14.5 + 10.4 + 18.8 = 75.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Concord Control Systems LtdCNCRD | 67.3/100Thin evidence · provisional60% evidence | 21.5/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 10 pp 48% evidence | 21.2/25 ROCE 30.6% · OPM 30% 76% evidence | 7.8/20 P/E 58.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 16.8/20 RS sector 66.1% · RS bench 50.8% · 1Y 122.8%11 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 21.5 + 21.2 + 7.8 + 16.8 = 67.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3Suzlon Energy LtdSUZLON | 64.9/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.6/35 Revenue 45.2% · PAT 50.1% · OPM change -3 pp 100% evidence | 18.2/25 ROCE 35.1% · OPM 16% 100% evidence | 19.3/20 P/E 20.4× · PEG 0.47 100% evidence | 3.8/20 RS sector -22.2% · RS bench -11% · 1Y -25.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.6 + 18.2 + 19.3 + 3.8 = 64.9 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -22.2% and the one-year return is -25.5%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 4Disa India LtdDISAQ | 61.7/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BASING | 17.0/35 Revenue 3.8% · PAT 6.3% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 20.9/25 ROCE 26.6% · OPM 14% 95% evidence | 12.7/20 P/E 31.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 11.1/20 RS sector 3% · RS bench -7.9% · 1Y -16.4%0 of 7 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 20.9 + 12.7 + 11.1 = 61.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5John Cockerill India LtdCOCKERILL | 55.2/100Mixed-positive evidence68% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.0/35 Revenue 55.7% · PAT 10.7% · OPM change 1 pp 74% evidence | 6.3/25 ROCE 6.5% · OPM -9% 100% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 931.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.0/20 RS sector 28.1% · RS bench 40.9% · 1Y 102%8 of 8 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24 + 6.3 + 8.9 + 16 = 55.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Bharat Heavy Electricals LtdBHEL | 55.1/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence | FADING | 25.1/35 Revenue 27% · PAT 100% · OPM change 17 pp 71% evidence | 8.6/25 ROCE 9.1% · OPM 7% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 60.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.0/20 RS sector 20% · RS bench 35.9% · 1Y 89.3%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.1 + 8.6 + 9.4 + 12 = 55.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Walchandnagar Industries LtdWALCHANNAG | 47.3/100Mixed-negative evidence69% evidence | FADING | 25.3/35 Revenue 38% · PAT 96.7% · OPM change 12.9 pp 71% evidence | 3.4/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 8.1% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 8.6/20 RS sector -1.7% · RS bench 11.3% · 1Y 23.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.3 + 3.4 + 10 + 8.6 = 47.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Eimco Elecon (India) LtdEIMCOELECO | 47.2/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 12.0/35 Revenue -1.6% · PAT -18.8% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 13.3/25 ROCE 10.3% · OPM 18% 95% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 29.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 11.6/20 RS sector -1.4% · RS bench 14.9% · 1Y -13.7%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12 + 13.3 + 10.3 + 11.6 = 47.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Integra Engineering India LtdINTEGRAEN | 41.7/100Mixed-negative evidence69% evidence | 8.4/35 Revenue -5.1% · PAT -28% · OPM change -3.5 pp 95% evidence | 17.9/25 ROCE 18.5% · OPM 16.4% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 38× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.4/20 RS sector -15.1% · RS bench -25.1% · 1Y -33.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 8.4 + 17.9 + 10 + 5.4 = 41.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Kabra Extrusion Technik LtdKABRAEXTRU | 39.7/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 15.0/35 Revenue 3.1% · PAT -80% · OPM change 8.4 pp 71% evidence | 5.5/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM 5% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 2585× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.7/20 RS sector -8% · RS bench 98.8% · 1Y 103.9%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15 + 5.5 + 8.5 + 10.7 = 39.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Hercules Investments Ltdthis pageHERCULES | 38.8/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | 13.8/35 Revenue -80% · PAT -74.3% · OPM change 3.7 pp 45% evidence | 8.7/25 ROCE 5.7% · OPM — 60% evidence | 12.7/20 P/E 8.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 3.6/20 RS sector -25% · RS bench -33% · 1Y -41.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-29 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 13.8 + 8.7 + 12.7 + 3.6 = 38.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Inox Wind LtdINOXWIND | 37.8/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.3/35 Revenue 17.1% · PAT -13.1% · OPM change -3 pp 100% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 10.5% · OPM 19% 100% evidence | 12.6/20 P/E 37× · PEG 1.22 65% evidence | 2.3/20 RS sector -43.3% · RS bench -34.5% · 1Y -47.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.3 + 9.6 + 12.6 + 2.3 = 37.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Windsor Machines LtdWINDMACHIN | 36.8/100Mixed-negative evidence68% evidence | TURNING | 18.0/35 Revenue 51% · PAT 100% · OPM change -2.8 pp 74% evidence | 1.3/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 4.2% 100% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 1050× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.8/20 RS sector -11.7% · RS bench 5.3% · 1Y -2.3%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 1.3 + 8.7 + 8.8 = 36.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14The Anup Engineering LtdANUP | 35.2/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence | ASLEEP | 8.8/35 Revenue 1.4% · PAT -29.7% · OPM change -15.5 pp 100% evidence | 16.8/25 ROCE 21% · OPM 7.6% 100% evidence | 4.8/20 P/E 43.2× · PEG 5.03 65% evidence | 4.8/20 RS sector -23.6% · RS bench -12.4% · 1Y -19.1%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.8 + 16.8 + 4.8 + 4.8 = 35.2 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 15Bajaj Steel Industries LtdBAJAJST | 31.9/100Adverse evidence81% evidence | BASING | 5.1/35 Revenue -2.6% · PAT -48.3% · OPM change -7.7 pp 95% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 11.7% · OPM 4.9% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 25.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -20% · RS bench -22.7% · 1Y -28.6%0 of 7 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 5.1 + 13.1 + 8.5 + 5.2 = 31.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Praj Industries LtdPRAJIND | 24.4/100Adverse evidence94% evidence | ASLEEP | 6.8/35 Revenue 2.4% · PAT -77.9% · OPM change -0.7 pp 100% evidence | 6.8/25 ROCE 6.1% · OPM 4.2% 100% evidence | 0.7/20 P/E 122× · PEG 4.5 100% evidence | 10.1/20 RS sector -0.5% · RS bench -3.7% · 1Y -25.1%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.8 + 6.8 + 0.7 + 10.1 = 24.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Hercules Investments Ltd's share price today?
Hercules Investments Ltd trades at ₹99.2, −31.6% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹317 Cr. The stock sits at the very bottom of its 52-week range (₹99–₹207), −35.1% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 15 weeks in. — as of 14 August 2026.
What were Hercules Investments Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Hercules Investments Ltd reported revenue of ₹0.0 Cr and net profit of ₹5.2 Cr for the Sep 25 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹1.62. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Hercules Investments Ltd's revenue?
Hercules Investments Ltd reported revenue of ₹0.0 Cr in the Sep 25 quarter. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was ₹0.0 Cr (−100.0%). — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Hercules Investments Ltd's profit?
Hercules Investments Ltd earned ₹5.2 Cr of net profit in the Sep 25 quarter, +96.2% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹5.6 Cr. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Hercules Investments Ltd's market cap?
Hercules Investments Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹317 Cr at a share price of ₹99.2. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Hercules Investments Ltd's P/E ratio?
Hercules Investments Ltd trades at a P/E of 8.6×, at the 1st percentile of its own 10-year range, against a long-run median of 14.2×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Hercules Investments Ltd pay a dividend?
Not in its latest year — Hercules Investments Ltd's dividend payout was 0% of profit in FY25. It did record a payout in 11 of its last 12 reported fiscal years, so there is a history but no current dividend. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Hercules Investments Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Hercules Investments Ltd looks cheap: its P/E of 8.6× has been cheaper only 1% of the time in 10 years (long-run median 14.2×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 14 August 2026.
How is Hercules Investments Ltd performing?
Hercules Investments Ltd is in a downtrend, 15 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 16 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 14 August 2026.
What stage is Hercules Investments Ltd in?
Turning around — profit growth swung from −100.0% at the trough to +96.2% off a 1-quarter-old trough (single-quarter readings), ROCE slipping at 0.7%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −100.0% latest, profit growth +96.2% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Hercules Investments Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 15 of stage 4), trading −35.1% versus its 200-day average and at the very bottom of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Hercules Investments Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Hercules Investments Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (16 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2025-12-05), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.0 years the stock moved +159% against the NIFTY 500's +236% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 14 August 2026.
Will Hercules Investments Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Hercules Investments Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹99.2, the price is in a downtrend 15 weeks in. Its P/E of 8.6× sits at the 1st percentile of its own 10-year range. — as of 14 August 2026.
Who owns Hercules Investments Ltd?
Promoters hold 69.6% of Hercules Investments Ltd, foreign institutions 0.0%, domestic institutions null% and the public 30.4% (latest quarter). No holder moved a full point over the last two years — the register is quiet. — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Hercules Investments Ltd have too much debt?
No — Hercules Investments Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.00, and operating profit covers the interest bill 29×. FY25 borrowings were ₹0.0 Cr against equity of ₹846 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Hercules Investments Ltd's capex?
Hercules Investments Ltd spent ₹−21.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was ₹−34.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Hercules Investments Ltd's cash flow?
Hercules Investments Ltd generated ₹7.6 Cr of operating cash flow in FY25 and ₹42.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹−34.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹5.6 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Hercules Investments Ltd's profit real cash?
Not fully — over the last 3 fiscal years, 33% of Hercules Investments Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was ₹7.6 Cr against reported profit of ₹5.6 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 14 August 2026.
Where is Hercules Investments Ltd in its business cycle?
Hercules Investments Ltd's FY24 operating margin was 16.0%, against a 11-year band of 1.4%–18.8%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 14 August 2026.
What growth does Hercules Investments Ltd's price assume?
At its price on 13 June 2026, Hercules Investments Ltd was priced for profit growth of about 25.9% a year. Profit itself has compounded −7.9% a year over the past 10 years. The figure reads the multiple backwards: the growth a buyer at that price was already paying for. — as of 14 August 2026.
What could break the Hercules Investments Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −31.6% in a year while annual EPS moved −84.5% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Hercules Investments Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Hercules Investments Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 14 August 2026.