Concord Control Systems Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Concord Control Systems Ltd trades at ₹2,397, in a confirmed uptrend and 63 weeks into that stage. That is +1.9% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 78% of a 52-week range of ₹729 to ₹2,859. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (3 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 63 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹2,397 it trades +1.9% versus its 200-day average and sits at 78% of its 52-week range (₹729–₹2,859).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 3.8 years the stock moved +2,635% while the NIFTY 500 moved +56% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (3 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-31) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Concord Control Systems Ltd trades at 58.7× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (59th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 51.2×, measured across 3.8 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 58.7× is mid-range by its own standards (59th percentile), against a long-run median of 51.2× measured over 3.8 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +82.0% against a +109.1% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +122.0%/yr price move, ~+83.6%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+38.4 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

What the price assumes This reading works the multiple backwards. It asks one question: what yearly rate of profit growth is a buyer at the market price already paying for? The number is the growth rate that makes eleven years of profit — six years growing, then five fading — add up to that day's market price, once each year is discounted at 11% a year.

Solved at its 13 June 2026 price, Concord Control Systems Ltd was paying for profit growth of about 26.9% a year. Profit itself has compounded 85.7% a year over the past 6 years. Today the market pays 58.7× P/E, the 59th percentile of its own 4-year range.

What the two numbers say together. The multiple is unremarkable against its own past, and the growth the price is paying for is below what this company has actually delivered.

How to hold this number: it is a reading of one day's price, taken on 13 June 2026, not a running figure — every other number on this page, the multiple included, is read off the live quote as of 18 September 2026. A higher price is paying for more growth and a lower price for less, so it moves whenever the price does, and this page does not restate it between measurements.

Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Concord Control Systems Ltd reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — no clean majority across the growth curves, ROCE slipping at 31.0% — the per-curve reads carry the story. The read is built from 8 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.

Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.

4-Factor Sector Score

No sector-relative score — Concord Control Systems Ltd is not present in the sector comparison for Capital Goods - Engineering Heavy.

The score is a rank WITHIN a peer set: every metric is scored by percentile against the other members. Without the peer set there is no score to state, so none is invented here.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Concord Control Systems Ltd reported ₹129 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +72.0% year on year. That is the 8th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 6 years it has compounded at 53.6% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹210 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹336 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹210 Cr (+69.4% on the year), capping 6 years at 53.6% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹129 Cr, +72.0% year on year — the 8th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +79.3% growth against the decade's 53.6% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Concord Control Systems Ltd's operating margin is 30.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, +10.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved +4.0 percentage points.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 30.0%, +10.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 7 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 11.0%–28.0%, and FY26's 28.0% is the top of that band — a record year.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +4.0 pp year on year while gross margin went +4.4 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Concord Control Systems Ltd earned ₹25.0 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +78.6% year on year. It is the 8th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹41.0 Cr. The 6-year compound rate is 85.7%. That is 19.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹7.0 Cr.

Mar 26 profit was ₹25.0 Cr, +78.6% year on year — the 8th consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹41.0 Cr (+78.3%), and the 6-year compound rate is 85.7%.

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +72.0% and the margin +10.0 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +78.0% vs revenue +79.3%. Profit and revenue are moving roughly in step.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years −71% of Concord Control Systems Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹−55.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹41.0 Cr of profit. After ₹25.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−80.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹−55.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹41.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−80.0 Cr after ₹25.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is −71% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

🚨 Why conversion sits at −71%: the cash cycle stretched 254 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: conversion is below par and the cash cycle has stretched 254 days — the next section's job is to find where the cash is stuck.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Concord Control Systems Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 374 days in FY26, up from 120 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹50.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹210 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.6 Cr, so roughly ₹215 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 210 days, inventory at 313 days — roughly 10.3 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 374 days, looser than FY21's 120.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 313 days to sell; customers pay about 210 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 148 days — netting out to the 374-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹210 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.6 Cr — so the 374-day loop keeps roughly ₹215 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹50.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹7.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹1.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: the working-capital loop is the cash sink the router flagged — watch the cycle, not the P&L.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Concord Control Systems Ltd earns a ROCE of 31% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 30% in FY21. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 19.5% net margin on 0.67× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 31%, recovered from a FY21 trough of 30% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 19.5% net margin × 0.67× asset turns × 1.51× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 19.7% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Concord Control Systems Ltd carries ₹54.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹209 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.26. Operating profit covers the interest bill 30×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹3.0 Cr to ₹54.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹50.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY26: borrowings of ₹54.0 Cr against equity of ₹209 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.26. Operating profit covers the interest bill 30×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹3.0 Cr to ₹54.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹50.0 Cr in just the last 3 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Promoters cut 8.0 points of Concord Control Systems Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 65.6% of the company. Domestic institutions moved −1.6 points over the same window, to 0.6%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Promoters: −8.0 points over 8 quarters to 65.6%; Domestic institutions: −1.6 points over 8 quarters to 0.6%; Foreign institutions: +0.1 points over 8 quarters to 0.1%.

🚨 Why the register moved: promoters drove it (−8.0 points), alongside domestic institutions (−1.6 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Concord Control Systems Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Frequently asked questions