Nurture Well Industries share price today

Nurture Well Industries Ltd's share price was ₹18.66 at the close on 30 October 2026. It has been falling for 22 weeks. That is 27.1% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹19 and ₹45, and at that close it sat 1% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Nurture Well Industries Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the NIFTY 500, and it has been behind for 8 weeks running.

Over the last 11 years the share price moved +20,633% while the NIFTY 500 moved +240%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 4 September 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

For April to June 2026 (the quarter ended 30 June 2026), Nurture Well Industries reported revenue of ₹153 crore, down 38.8% from ₹250 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹13.0 crore, down 48.0% from ₹25.0 crore.

Nurture Well Industries results: April to June 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for July to September 2026, are due by 14 November 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 June 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Nurture Well Industries closed at ₹18.66 on 30 October 2026, down 24.8% from ₹24.81 a year earlier (31 October 2025) and up 10,266.7% over five years. Its highest weekly close since March 2016 was ₹44.06 on 20 February 2026.

Nurture Well Industries share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 30 Oct 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

339 weekly closes from 22 March 2016 to 30 October 2026.

30 Oct 2026: Nurture Well Industries closed at ₹18.66, up 0.8% on the week and down 6.8% on the month. Results for April to June 2026: Revenue down 38.8% and profit down 48.0% on a year earlier.

No. Nurture Well Industries Ltd paid out 0% of its profit as dividends in each of its last 13 reported years, so there is no payout history to show. That comes from the filed annual statements, not an estimate (as of 30 October 2026).

Nurture Well Industries is not on any of our India lists this week.

Nurture Well Industries Ltd earned ₹13.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, −48.0% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹85.0 Cr. That is 8.5% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹25.0 Cr. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹85.0 Cr (+26.9% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed −38.8% on a year earlier and the margin moved +1.0 percentage points. Sales did the work, and the margin was about flat.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +13.9% and revenue +10.9%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra rupee of revenue adds more to profit.

Nurture Well Industries Ltd reported ₹153 Cr of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, −38.8% on the same quarter a year earlier. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,026 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹930 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

A growth rate over several years is not shown, because there are too few years of figures to work one out properly.

FY26 revenue was ₹1,026 Cr, +33.9% on the year before.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +6.2%, against +43.4% a year over the last 8 quarters (rolling over); profit over the last 12 months grew −6.4%, against +42.4% a year (rolling over).

Nurture Well Industries Ltd's operating margin was 11.0% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 1.0 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 years it has been between −33.3% and 1,788.2%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +0.6 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +2.9 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years Nurture Well Industries Ltd's operations used more cash than they brought in, so cash conversion was −8%, a gap worth watching. In FY26 its operations used ₹22.0 Cr of cash, against ₹85.0 Cr of profit. After ₹34.0 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹56.0 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason.

What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Nurture Well Industries Ltd's customer, stock and supplier day counts come out in the thousands of days on sales this small (₹1,026 Cr in FY26), so no cash-cycle chart is drawn and this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent ₹112 Cr on assets over the last 3 years.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

Averaged over those years that is 3.6% of FY26 revenue a year.

Spending on assets: ₹112 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹8.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹4.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Nurture Well Industries Ltd's P/E is 7.5×, near the low end of its own history: it has been lower only 4% of the time. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 12.9×, over 3.5 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +18.5% while the price moved −24.8%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

Where the price move came from: over 3 years the price moved +2.9% a year; about +214.6% a year came from earnings growth and about −211.7 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Nurture Well Industries Ltd's business is slowing from a peak. Revenue and profit growth have slowed sharply (revenue growth from +2273.9% at its peak to +6.2% now), while ROCE is still 23.0%. This is based on 10 quarters of 3 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: slowing from a peak is where good stories often end quietly.

One or more growth lines have an extreme jump caused by comparing with a near-zero or loss-making quarter. Those jumps are capped before reading and drawn at the edge of the chart, so one odd quarter does not decide the result.

The return figures here are yearly, not quarterly. They show level and direction only; they can support the growth lines but never decide the reading alone.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Nurture Well Industries Ltd earned a ROCE of 23% in FY26. That is up from a low of −11% in FY14. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 4.2 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 8.3% net margin and 1.82× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 8.3% net margin × 1.82× asset turnover × 1.52× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 23.0% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 16.2% − 12.0% = +4.2 percentage points. The 12.0% is a standard assumption for the cost of capital in India, not an estimate for this company. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Positive but thin: it creates value with little room for error.

Nurture Well Industries Ltd had ₹35.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹370 Cr of equity in FY26, so its debt is 0.09× its equity. Its operating profit is 90 times its interest bill. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹4.9 Cr to ₹35.0 Cr. Over the last 3 of those years it spent ₹112 Cr on assets.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Interest cover shows how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low debt and high cover are the safe combination.

Part of the spending on assets is being paid for with borrowed money.

Foreign institutions cut their stake in Nurture Well Industries Ltd by 5.0 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Foreign institutions now own 0.1% of the company. Promoters moved +4.9 points over the same period, to 53.8%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Foreign institutions: −5.0 points over 8 quarters, to 0.1%; Promoters: +4.9 points over 8 quarters, to 53.8%; Domestic institutions: +0.0 points over 8 quarters, to 0.1%.

Why the owners changed: foreign institutions drove it (−5.0 points), with the other side taken by promoters (+4.9 points). They reduced their stake.