Kesar Enterprises Ltd
KESARKesar Enterprises Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.
The price is in a downtrend (17 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 34th percentile of its own 7-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving, and 113% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Kesar Enterprises Ltd trades at ₹4.7, in a downtrend and 17 weeks into that stage. That is −39.7% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 0% of a 52-week range of ₹5 to ₹14. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (20 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 17 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹4.7 it trades −39.7% versus its 200-day average and sits at 0% of its 52-week range (₹5–₹14).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.0 years the stock moved +76% while the NIFTY 500 moved +260% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (20 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2025-10-17) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Kesar Enterprises Ltd trades at 1.9× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 34% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 8.4×, measured across 7.4 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 1.9× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 34% of the time, against a long-run median of 8.4× measured over 7.4 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the −8.4%/yr price move, ~−2.9%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−5.5 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Kesar Enterprises Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 10 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −9.0% | −18.1% | −11.1% | −0.4% |
| Share price | −40.6% | −8.4% | −1.2% | +5.8% |
4-Factor Sector Score
32.8/100 — rank 16 of 20 in Diversified · 51% evidence confidence
Kesar Enterprises Ltd scores 32.8 out of 100 against the 20 companies it is compared with in Diversified, ranking 16. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 14.4 + 4.9 + 10 + 3.5 = 32.8. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Kesar Enterprises Ltd reported ₹166 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +163.5% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at −0.4% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹304 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹304 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹304 Cr (−9.0% on the year), capping 10 years at −0.4% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹166 Cr, +163.5% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −1.8% growth against the decade's −0.4% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −9.0% over the last 4 quarters against −24.3%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Kesar Enterprises Ltd's operating margin is −3.7% in the Mar 26 quarter, +9.3 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −12.0% to 17.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is −3.7%, +9.3 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −12.0%–17.0%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −22,132.2 pp year on year while gross margin went −1,441.8 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Kesar Enterprises Ltd posted a net loss of ₹7.0 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹48.0 Cr. That loss is 4.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹16.0 Cr. 11 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was ₹−7.0 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹−48.0 Cr (null).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 113% of Kesar Enterprises Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹−25.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹−48.0 Cr of profit. After ₹0.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−25.0 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹−25.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−48.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−25.0 Cr after ₹0.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 113% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 113%: the cash cycle tightened 166 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Kesar Enterprises Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs −233 days in FY26, down from −67 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹45.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹304 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.8 Cr, so roughly ₹−194 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 6 days, inventory at 6 days — roughly 0.2 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of −233 days, tighter than FY21's −67.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 6 days to sell; customers pay about 6 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 245 days — netting out to the −233-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹304 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.8 Cr — so the −233-day loop keeps roughly ₹−194 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹45.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹62.0 Cr of depreciation — spending at or below maintenance level. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Kesar Enterprises Ltd earns a ROCE of −20% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −26% in FY25. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is −15.8% net margin on 0.67× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is −20%, recovered from a FY25 trough of −26% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): −15.8% net margin × 0.67× asset turns × 6.29× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −66.6% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Kesar Enterprises Ltd carries ₹93.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹72.0 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 1.29. Operating profit covers the interest bill −2×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹113 Cr to ₹93.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹45.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY26: borrowings of ₹93.0 Cr against equity of ₹72.0 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 1.29. Operating profit covers the interest bill −2×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹113 Cr to ₹93.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹45.0 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
No holder of Kesar Enterprises Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. Domestic institutions moved −0.2 points over the same window, to 1.5%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Promoters: −0.4 points over 8 quarters to 70.5%; Domestic institutions: −0.2 points over 8 quarters to 1.5%.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Kesar Enterprises Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1BCL Industries LtdBCLIND | 62.6/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | FADING | 19.5/35 Revenue -13.1% · PAT 15.2% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 13.9% · OPM 10% 95% evidence | 13.3/20 P/E 9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 14.9/20 RS sector 3.3% · RS bench 1.7% · 1Y -17.2%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.5 + 14.9 + 13.3 + 14.9 = 62.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Indiabulls LimitedIBULLSLTD | 61.8/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence | LEADER | 18.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 28 pp 71% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 16.2% · OPM 43% 76% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 13× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.7/20 RS sector 48.8% · RS bench 45% · 1Y 67.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 14.1 + 10.6 + 18.7 = 61.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Grasim Industries LtdGRASIM | 60.7/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | LEADER | 24.2/35 Revenue 19.5% · PAT 33.1% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 23% 76% evidence | 6.8/20 P/E 38.5× · PEG — 50% evidence | 16.6/20 RS sector 12.6% · RS bench 10.7% · 1Y 20.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.2 + 13.1 + 6.8 + 16.6 = 60.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Kalind Ltd526935 | 59.8/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 30.6/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 21 pp 95% evidence | 18.2/25 ROCE 32% · OPM 63% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 13.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 0.3/20 RS sector -89.2% · RS bench -36.7% · 1Y -67.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 30.6 + 18.2 + 10.7 + 0.3 = 59.8 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -89.2% and the one-year return is -67.4%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 5Sobhagya Mercantile LtdSOBME | 57.6/100Mixed-positive evidence69% evidence | 15.9/35 Revenue 21.9% · PAT 8.1% · OPM change -0.5 pp 95% evidence | 19.1/25 ROCE 23.4% · OPM 14.4% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 60.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.0/20 RS sector 2.3% · RS bench 8.3% · 1Y -1.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 15.9 + 19.1 + 9.6 + 13 = 57.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 8.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 63M India Ltd3MINDIA | 55.4/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.9/35 Revenue 15.7% · PAT 16.1% · OPM change -3 pp 100% evidence | 18.7/25 ROCE 50% · OPM 17% 100% evidence | 4.2/20 P/E 90.3× · PEG 3.29 100% evidence | 10.6/20 RS sector -2.5% · RS bench 4.5% · 1Y 11.8%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.9 + 18.7 + 4.2 + 10.6 = 55.4 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 7Balmer Lawrie & Company LtdBALMLAWRIE | 53.5/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.0/35 Revenue 8.9% · PAT 3.8% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 15.1/25 ROCE 14.6% · OPM 13% 76% evidence | 14.5/20 P/E 10.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.9/20 RS sector -7.2% · RS bench -8.5% · 1Y -16.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 15.1 + 14.5 + 6.9 = 53.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Texmaco Infrastructure & Holdings LtdTEXINFRA | 50.6/100Mixed-positive evidence80% evidence | LEADER | 18.9/35 Revenue 5.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -37.9 pp 95% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM -48.8% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 151× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.2/20 RS sector 7.6% · RS bench 5.7% · 1Y 10.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.9 + 7 + 8.5 + 16.2 = 50.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Nurture Well Industries Ltd531889 | 50.2/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.8/35 Revenue 34% · PAT 27% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 16.5/25 ROCE 22.9% · OPM 11% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 9.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.6/20 RS sector -24.3% · RS bench -25.5% · 1Y 13.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 16.5 + 11.3 + 2.6 = 50.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Bluspring Enterprises LtdBLUSPRING | 43.4/100Thin evidence · provisional57% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.5/35 Revenue 11.8% · PAT 90.6% · OPM change 0.7 pp 71% evidence | 4.2/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 2.2% 95% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 109× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench 42.5% · 1Y 37.6%10 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.5 + 4.2 + 8.7 + 12 = 43.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Nava LtdNAVA | 42.2/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence | ASLEEP | 10.0/35 Revenue 9% · PAT -29.9% · OPM change -6 pp 100% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 12.8% · OPM 43% 100% evidence | 12.9/20 P/E 21.4× · PEG 1.16 65% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -4.9% · RS bench -6.4% · 1Y -5.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10 + 13.1 + 12.9 + 6.2 = 42.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Tube Investments of India LtdTIINDIA | 41.9/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.6/35 Revenue 17.6% · PAT 6.6% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 15.4/25 ROCE 17.1% · OPM 9% 100% evidence | 2.1/20 P/E 84.4× · PEG 9.63 100% evidence | 8.8/20 RS sector -3.7% · RS bench -5.3% · 1Y -4.9%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.6 + 15.4 + 2.1 + 8.8 = 41.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Bharat Global Developers LtdBGDL | 37.0/100Mixed-negative evidence63% evidence | 8.2/35 Revenue -80% · PAT -80% · OPM change 4.2 pp 95% evidence | 6.8/25 ROCE 0% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 12.0/20 RS sector 165.8% · RS bench -70.1% · 1Y 22%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 8.2 + 6.8 + 10 + 12 = 37 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Andrew Yule & Company LtdANDREWYU | 35.9/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.6/35 Revenue -4.8% · PAT -80% · OPM change 25.9 pp 95% evidence | 3.7/25 ROCE -6.3% · OPM -23.4% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -36.2% · RS bench 6.3% · 1Y -2.1%7 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.6 + 3.7 + 10 + 7.6 = 35.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Swan Corp LtdSWANCORP | 33.0/100Adverse evidence69% evidence | BASING | 12.0/35 Revenue -16.7% · PAT -67.2% · OPM change -2.6 pp 95% evidence | 6.5/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM -0.4% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 42.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -28.5% · RS bench -23.1% · 1Y -26.6%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12 + 6.5 + 9.8 + 4.7 = 33 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Kesar Enterprises Ltdthis pageKESAR | 32.8/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence | 14.4/35 Revenue -9% · PAT 34.7% · OPM change -22132 pp 62% evidence | 4.9/25 ROCE -19.5% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -44.4% · RS bench -39.4% · 1Y -54.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 14.4 + 4.9 + 10 + 3.5 = 32.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Integrated Industries LtdIIL | 64.0/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | 20.5/35 Revenue 60.5% · PAT 94.6% · OPM change 2 pp 53% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 30.5% · OPM 11% 57% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 11.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.2/20 RS sector 51.9% · RS bench 63.7% · 1Y 114.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 16.4 + 10.9 + 16.2 = 64 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18Arunis Abode LtdARUNIS | 50.7/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence | 15.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -17.7 pp 40% evidence | 9.5/25 ROCE -5.3% · OPM 28.5% 57% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 62.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.7/20 RS sector 131.3% · RS bench 136.7% · 1Y 358.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 15.2 + 9.5 + 9.3 + 16.7 = 50.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19Piramal Enterprises Ltd(Merged)PEL | 44.8/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence | 16.7/35 Revenue -35.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -9.8 pp 27% evidence | 11.1/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 77.4% 57% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 61.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -20.3% · RS bench 1% · 1Y -1.1%6 of 12 weeks ahead to 2025-09-24 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 11.1 + 9.4 + 7.6 = 44.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 20Rossell India LtdROSSELLIND | 42.5/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | 14.8/35 Revenue 4.8% · PAT -41.1% · OPM change 0.1 pp 36% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 10.7% 71% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 11.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -27.9% · RS bench -19.6% · 1Y -34.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-29 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 14.8 + 11.7 + 10.8 + 5.2 = 42.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Kesar Enterprises Ltd's share price today?
Kesar Enterprises Ltd trades at ₹4.7, −40.6% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹71.5 Cr. The stock sits at the very bottom of its 52-week range (₹5–₹14), −39.7% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 17 weeks in. — as of 14 August 2026.
What were Kesar Enterprises Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Kesar Enterprises Ltd reported revenue of ₹166 Cr and a net loss of ₹7.0 Cr for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹−0.73. The operating margin was −3.7%, 9.3 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Kesar Enterprises Ltd's revenue?
Kesar Enterprises Ltd reported revenue of ₹166 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter, +163.5% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹304 Cr (−9.0%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at −0.4% a year. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Kesar Enterprises Ltd's profit?
Kesar Enterprises Ltd earned ₹−7.0 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹−48.0 Cr. The operating margin ran −3.7% in the latest quarter. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Kesar Enterprises Ltd's market cap?
Kesar Enterprises Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹71.5 Cr at a share price of ₹4.7. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Kesar Enterprises Ltd's P/E ratio?
Kesar Enterprises Ltd trades at a P/E of 1.9×, at the 34th percentile of its own 7-year range, against a long-run median of 8.4×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Kesar Enterprises Ltd pay a dividend?
No — Kesar Enterprises Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Kesar Enterprises Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Kesar Enterprises Ltd looks cheap: its P/E of 1.9× has been cheaper only 34% of the time in 7 years (long-run median 8.4×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 14 August 2026.
How is Kesar Enterprises Ltd performing?
Kesar Enterprises Ltd is in a downtrend, 17 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 20 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Kesar Enterprises Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 17 of stage 4), trading −39.7% versus its 200-day average and at the very bottom of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Kesar Enterprises Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Kesar Enterprises Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (20 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2025-10-17), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.0 years the stock moved +76% against the NIFTY 500's +260% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 14 August 2026.
Will Kesar Enterprises Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Kesar Enterprises Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹4.7, the price is in a downtrend 17 weeks in. Its P/E of 1.9× sits at the 34th percentile of its own 7-year range. — as of 14 August 2026.
Who owns Kesar Enterprises Ltd?
Promoters hold 70.5% of Kesar Enterprises Ltd, foreign institutions null%, domestic institutions 1.5% and the public 27.9% (latest quarter). No holder moved a full point over the last two years — the register is quiet. — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Kesar Enterprises Ltd have too much debt?
It carries real leverage — Kesar Enterprises Ltd's debt-to-equity is 1.29, and operating profit covers the interest bill −2×. FY26 borrowings were ₹93.0 Cr against equity of ₹72.0 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Kesar Enterprises Ltd's capex?
Kesar Enterprises Ltd spent ₹45.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹0.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Kesar Enterprises Ltd's cash flow?
Kesar Enterprises Ltd consumed ₹25.0 Cr of operating cash in FY26 — cash flowed out rather than in (free cash flow: ₹−25.0 Cr). Reported profit that year was ₹−48.0 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Kesar Enterprises Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 113% of Kesar Enterprises Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. Though the latest year ran at 52% — the trend is the thing to watch. In FY26, operating cash was ₹−25.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−48.0 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 14 August 2026.
Where is Kesar Enterprises Ltd in its business cycle?
Kesar Enterprises Ltd's FY26 operating margin was −8.0%, against a 13-year band of −12.0%–17.0%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran −3.7%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 14 August 2026.
What could break the Kesar Enterprises Ltd story?
Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Kesar Enterprises Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Kesar Enterprises Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 14 August 2026.